SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 40
Download to read offline
C I T Y O F N E W T O N P L A N N I N G D E P A R T M E N T
S A F E R O U T E S T O S C H O O L
S P R I N G 2 0 1 4
Newton Student
Transportation Survey
Survey Background
 Purpose of Survey
 To determine how and why children get to and from school
 How it was administered
 Survey Monkey link sent via PTO newsletters and Principal emails
 Response rate
 High response rate, averaging just over 30% of families responded
 While range of elementary school responses were 7% - 50% ,12 of the
15 elementary exceeding 20%
 Middle school and high school responses were clustered near the
25% average response rate for secondary schools
 Mostly positive follow up emails sent by many
respondents
2
Completed Surveys
Elementary
1394
Middle School
773
High School
913
3
Completed Surveys
Elementary
1394
Middle School
773
High School
913
School
completed
Surveys
% of
families
Mason-Rice 164 50%
Cabot 179 46%
Zervas 104 43%
Pierce 85 35%
Bowen 132 35%
Countryside 115 33%
Lincoln Eliot 89 32%
Underwood 80 32%
Burr 97 27%
Average 92.9 30.6%
Horace Mann 95 29%
Franklin 78 26%
Angier 77 24%
Williams 45 18%
Ward 31 16%
Memorial
Spaulding 23 7%
Total 1,394 31%
School
completed
surveys
% of
families
Bigelow 104 23%
Brown 284 45%
Day 252 31%
Oak Hill 133 24%
Total 773 32%
School
completed
surveys
% of
families
Newton North 472 28%
Newton South 441 29%
Total 913 29%
4
Comments on Survey Data
 Underrepresented populations
 Schools
 MBTA riders
 High school drivers
 High school bicycle riders
 Winter effect
 Responses likely slightly over weighted to driving due to timing of
survey doesn’t include fair weather walkers/bikers
 Distance to school data
 Obtained outside of survey process
 Limits ability to mine data using Survey Monkey tools
 Captures a great deal of additional comments
 Highlight specific problems
 These deserve further review
5
Transportation Mode
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
ReportedDailyTrips
Survey Responses
To School
From School
6
Estimating Daily Trips
 GIS data used to determine walking distance for each
family from home to school based on main
intersections given
 Developed transportation mode profile for distance
segments based on average survey responses from
families that live within that distance segment
 Estimated number of trips by mode by applying
mode profile to the estimated # of families within
that distance segment
7
How do students get to and from school?
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
EstimatedDailyTrips
All Students *
To School
From School
* Excludes Memorial Spaulding due to low response rate and out-of-district students
8
How do students get to and from school?
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
EstimatedDailyTrips
Elementary Students*
To School
From School
The family vehicle is the primary way students get to and from school.
Average distance walked: 0.49 miles
Average distance biked: 0.66 miles
* Excludes Memorial Spaulding due to low response rate and out-of-district students
9
45% of elementary parents
responding drive every day
35% of elementary parents
responding walk every day
What did we hear about why choices are made?
Elementary
• Why we walk?
• We want to walk not drive – 566 families
• We have no choice – 89 families
• Parents leave for work before school starts
• No driver available or no car available to drive
• Why we drive?
• 427 families responded snowy, icy sidewalks is the #1 reason
they drive, another 270 listed it as key reason
• 300+ responded they are on their way to/from somewhere
• 250 responded unsafe crossings as #1 reason they drive
10
How do students get to and from school?
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
EstimatedDailyTrips
Middle School Students
To School
From School
Average distance of car trip: 1.23 miles
35% of car trips under 1 mile
Average distance walked: 0.83 miles
Average distance biked:
1.0 mile
Nearly 50% of children driven in the morning walk or take the bus after school.
11
How do students get to and from school?
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
EstimatedDailyTrips
High School Students
To School
From School
Trips by vehicle is again the primary way students get to and from school.
Average distance of car trip: 1.62 miles
18% of car trips under 1 mile
Average distance
walked: 0.94 miles
Average distance
biked: 1.49 miles
12
What did we hear about why choices are made?
Middle School & High School
 Responses were similar at both levels
• Why we don’t drive?
• Primary reason is kids like to walk
• Inconvenient to drive
• Live very close
• Bus is very convenient
• 10% of students walk, bike or take the bus as parents leave for work
before kids leave for school
• 20%+ must walk, bike or take the bus home because of parents’ work
schedule
• Why we drive?
• 24% families stated that snowy, icy sidewalks is the #1 reason they drive
their kids TO school
• 23% of families think the walk takes too long
13
Transportation modes by distance – to school
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
< 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2
mile
1/2 - 1 mile > 1 mile
DailyTripstoSchool
Distance from home to school
Elementary Students
Car Pool
Family
vehicle
Riding the
bus
Biking/
Scootering
Walking
14
Transportation modes by distance – from school
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
< 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2
mile
1/2 - 1 mile > 1 mile
DailyTripsfromSchool
Distance from to school to home
Elementary Students
Car Pool
Family
vehicle
Riding the
bus
Biking/
Scootering
Walking
15
Transportation modes by distance – to school
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
< 1/4
mile
1/4 to
1/2 mile
1/2 - 1
mile
1 -1 1/2
miles
1 1/2 - 2
miles
> 2
miles
Dailytripstoschool
Distance from home to school
Middle School Students
Car Pool
Family
vehicle
MBTA
School Bus
Biking/
Scootering
Walking
16
Transportation modes by distance – from school
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
< 1/4
mile
1/4 to
1/2 mile
1/2 - 1
mile
1 -1 1/2
miles
1 1/2 - 2
miles
> 2
miles
Dailytripstoschool
Distance from to school to home
Middle School Students
Car Pool
Family
vehicle
MBTA
School Bus
Biking/
Scootering
Walking
Nearly 50% of children driven in the morning walk or take the bus after school.
17
Transportation modes by distance – to school
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
< 1/4
mile
1/4 to
1/2 mile
1/2 - 1
mile
1 -1 1/2
miles
1 1/2 - 2
miles
> 2
miles
Dailytripsfromschool
Distance from home to school
High School Students Car Pool
Drives with
other student
Drives
themselves
Family vehicle
MBTA
School Bus
Biking/
Scootering
Walking
18
Transportation modes by distance – from school
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
< 1/4
mile
1/4 to
1/2 mile
1/2 - 1
mile
1 -1 1/2
miles
1 1/2 - 2
miles
> 2
miles
Dailytripsfromschool
Distance from school to home
High School Students Car Pool
Drives with
other student
Drives
themselves
Family vehicle
MBTA
School Bus
Biking/
Scootering
Walking
19
Impacts of current school transportation model
 Increased stress on crowded streets and neighborhoods
 Decreased air quality
 Negative environmental impact
 Missed opportunity for active transportation
 Exercise
 Social time
 Improved feeling of
well being
 Time to think
 Better prepared to
learn
 Sense of
accomplishment
 Independence
20
Assessing sentiment for walkable schools
 Parents were asked to rate their feelings on the
following statements:
 I want to live in a community where most kids walk or bike to
school 67% AGREE
 I think the City should quickly address structural issues
(crosswalks, lights, crossing guards) to make it safer for
children to walk to school 84% AGREE
 I think the city should enforce the sidewalk snow removal
ordinance 84% AGREE
 I want the School Committee to make walking to school a
priority in establishing school districts 58% AGREE
21
What is the mode shift opportunity?
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
< 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2
mile
1/2 - 1 mile > 1 mile
TotalDailyTrips
Distance from home to school
Elementary Students
Car Pool
Family
vehicle
Riding the
bus
Biking/Scoo
tering
Walking
22
Mode shift opportunity at the elementary schools
 Make walking and biking for students living within ½ mile of
school the primary mode of transportation
 increase from 55% to 70% 820 less daily car trips
 Increase biking for students living between ½ mile and 1 mile
and some increase in walking
 increase from 30% to 43%  525 less daily car trips
 Increase bus ridership for students who qualify
 Increase from 40% to 50%  140 less daily car trips
 Encourage carpooling and driving part way for those that do
drive
 Increase carpools to 10%  360 less daily car trips
 Encourage 20% of car trips drive part way  200 less daily car
trips
23
What is the mode shift opportunity?
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
< 1/4
mile
1/4 to
1/2 mile
1/2 - 1
mile
1 -1 1/2
miles
1 1/2 - 2
miles
> 2
miles
TotalDailyTrips
Distance from home to school
Middle School Students
Car Pool
Family
vehicle
MBTA
School Bus
Biking/Sco
otering
Walking
24
Mode shift opportunity at the middle schools
 Make walking and biking for students living within 1 mile of
school the primary mode of transportation
 increase from 55% to 70% 200 less daily car trips
 Increase biking for students living less than 2 miles from
school
 increase from 2% to 8%  130 less daily car trips
 Increase bus ridership for students who qualify
 Increase from 67% to 72%  120 less daily car trips
 Encourage carpooling and driving part way for those that do
drive
 Increase carpools to 6%  120 less daily car trips
 Encourage 20% of car trips drive part way  115 less daily car
trips
25
What is the mode shift opportunity?
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
< 1/4
mile
1/4 to
1/2
mile
1/2 - 1
mile
1 -1 1/2
miles
1 1/2 - 2
miles
> 2
miles
TotalDailyTrips
Distance from home to school
High School Students Car Pool
Drives with
other student
Drives
themselves
Family vehicle
MBTA
School Bus
Biking/Scoote
ring
Walking
26
Mode shift opportunity at the high schools
 Make walking and biking for students living within 1 mile of
school the primary mode of transportation
 increase from 54% to 78% 360 less daily car trips
 Increase biking for students living less than 2 miles from
school
 increase from 3% to 12%  300 less daily car trips
 Increase bus ridership for students who qualify
 Increase from 39% to 44%  200 less daily car trips
 Encourage carpooling and driving part-way for those that do
drive
 Increase carpools to 7%  230 less daily car trips
 Encourage 20% of car trips drive part way  150 less daily car
trips
27
Summarizing Mode Shift
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Current After Mode Shift
Car Pool
Drives with other
student
Drives themselves
Family vehicle
MBTA
School Bus
Biking/Scootering
Walking
1,500
1,200
450
3,800
28
Mode shift goals by school
School goals
Walking Biking School Bus Vehicle
Elementary
Schools
35 families at
each school
15 families 5 families 10 families to
carpool, 20
families to
drive part way
Middle
Schools
25 families 30 families 15 families 15 families to
carpool, 20
families to
drive part way
High Schools 75 families 100 families 50 families 25 families to
carpool, 65
families to
drive part way
29
Estimated Annual Reduction in car trips
 Almost 2,000 less car trips per day
 Estimated 3,700+ miles per day
 180 school days
 670,000 miles per year
 Achieving this type of mode shift will require
motivation for change and the removal of barriers to
walking, biking & the bus
30
Are parents encouraged to walk & bike?
 % that feel their child’s school encourages or strongly
encourages walking and biking to school
 64% Elementary school
 15% Middle School
 10% High School
 Elementary schools with highest results
 Burr, Peirce, Angier, Mason-Rice at 80%
31
What did we hear about conditions along routes
to school from families that walk/bike/bus?
 Top 5 issues from elementary families whose
children walk least some of the time
 59% observe unsafe driver behavior
 40% have issues with broken or cracked sidewalks
 40% observe cars that fail to yield to crossing pedestrians
 27% have missing sidewalk sections along the route
 25% have faded crosswalks
 Issues for middle school and high school families are
similar
 72% of middle school parents observe unsafe driver behavior
 Ranking for other issues is very similar
32
Impact of weather on walking and biking
 Elementary
 25% of the regular walkers will still walk in the rain, snow or
very cold temperatures
 Cold temperatures have the biggest impact driving 55% of
regular walkers to likely be driven
 Middle School+ High School
 Only 15% of the regular walkers will still walk in the rain, snow
or very cold temperatures
 Again cold temperatures have the biggest impact causing over
60% of regular walkers to likely be driven; snow is a close
second at 58% likely to be driven
33
What did we hear specifically about snow?
 Elementary
 89% indicated uncleared sidewalks are an issue
 50% of parents responded that uncleared sidewalks along the
route cause them to drive to school
 Another 39% noted that uncleared sidewalks were an issue but still
preferred to walk to school
 70% of walking families had issues with snow piles on corners
and crosswalks
 Middle School & High School
 Similiar
34
Bus Ridership
 Elementary School
 1394 respondents
 240 eligible, 125 yes take the bus, 115 do not take the bus
 283 do not know if student is eligible
 Middle School
 398 eligible, 342 yes take the bus, 57 do not take the bus
 83 do not know if student is eligible
 High School
 406 eligible, 273 yes take the bus, 133 do not take the bus
 108 do not know if student is eligible
35
Why elementary school students don’t take bus
Before-
school or
after school
activities,
34%
Bus fee too
high, 34%
Do not want
children on the
bus, 31%
Concerns about
the safety of
walk to bus
stop, 13%
Bus ride is too
long, 13%
Bus stop is
too far, 11%
Bus comes too
early, 8%
36
Why middle school students don’t take bus
Bus fee too
high, 41%
Bus comes too
early, 30%
Do not want
children on the
bus, 27%
Bus ride is too
long, 25%
Bus stop is
too far, 20%
Before-school
or after school
activities, 11%
Concerns about
the safety of
walk to bus
stop, 11%
37
Why high school students don’t take the bus
My children do not
want to be on the
bus, 40%
Before-school or
after school
activities, 33%
Bus fee too high,
32%
Bus comes too
early, 28%
Bus ride is too
long, 18%
Bus stop
is too far,
17%
Student parking
fee more
reasonable than
bus fee, 13%
Do not want children
on the bus, 6%
Bus leaves school
too late, 6% Concerns about the
safety of walk to bus
stop, 2%
%
38
Evaluation of MBTA usage
 Repeat estimated daily ridership numbers
 Middle School
 94 have access to MBTA route
 513 no access
 168 do not know
 52 bus (Parker/Centre St.) is 83% of ridership
 59 bus (Walnut St.) is 15%
 High School
 161 have access to MBTA route
 557 no access
 133 do not know
 59 bus (Walnut St.) is 60%
 52 bus (Parker/Centre St.) is 30% of ridership
 Green line is 13%
 Look at key issues faced and any praise
39
Summary
 High vehicle usage has impact on everyone
 Quality of life
 Environmental
 Cost to city of additional vehicle traffic?
 Significant opportunity for mode shift
 Next steps?
 Encouragement and information on benefits of more walking
and biking
 Infrastructure improvements and better snow clearing
necessary to help aid mode shift
 Review of bus policies and schedule
 Engage key stakeholders in adopting mode shift goals
40

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (15)

Florida’s Religious Syncretism Most Recent-1
Florida’s Religious Syncretism Most Recent-1Florida’s Religious Syncretism Most Recent-1
Florida’s Religious Syncretism Most Recent-1
 
Know
KnowKnow
Know
 
skydrive_word_doc
skydrive_word_docskydrive_word_doc
skydrive_word_doc
 
Facil
FacilFacil
Facil
 
TCE
TCETCE
TCE
 
Presentacion Curso computacion
Presentacion Curso computacionPresentacion Curso computacion
Presentacion Curso computacion
 
Eng copy (2)
Eng   copy (2)Eng   copy (2)
Eng copy (2)
 
JB Certificates
JB CertificatesJB Certificates
JB Certificates
 
09 tabgha bienaventuranzas
09 tabgha bienaventuranzas09 tabgha bienaventuranzas
09 tabgha bienaventuranzas
 
Invetario
InvetarioInvetario
Invetario
 
Silabo evaluacion educativa pato tobar
Silabo evaluacion educativa pato tobarSilabo evaluacion educativa pato tobar
Silabo evaluacion educativa pato tobar
 
Diapositiva de las eras geológicas.
Diapositiva de las eras geológicas.Diapositiva de las eras geológicas.
Diapositiva de las eras geológicas.
 
iva en colombia
iva en colombiaiva en colombia
iva en colombia
 
File 1
File 1File 1
File 1
 
05 templo jerusalem nv
05 templo jerusalem nv05 templo jerusalem nv
05 templo jerusalem nv
 

Similar to SRTS Parent Survey Presentation published

Newton SRTS Conference on survey
Newton SRTS Conference on surveyNewton SRTS Conference on survey
Newton SRTS Conference on surveyAlicia G. Bowman
 
STEP Conference 2015 - Stuart Hay, Living Streets - Walking: Can Simple Steps...
STEP Conference 2015 - Stuart Hay, Living Streets - Walking: Can Simple Steps...STEP Conference 2015 - Stuart Hay, Living Streets - Walking: Can Simple Steps...
STEP Conference 2015 - Stuart Hay, Living Streets - Walking: Can Simple Steps...STEP_scotland
 
Student Free Fare Program Update: April 19, 2016
Student Free Fare Program Update: April 19, 2016Student Free Fare Program Update: April 19, 2016
Student Free Fare Program Update: April 19, 2016Fairfax County
 
Transitions.Schick.Laketran
Transitions.Schick.LaketranTransitions.Schick.Laketran
Transitions.Schick.LaketranJulia Schick
 
Transitions.Schick.Laketran
Transitions.Schick.LaketranTransitions.Schick.Laketran
Transitions.Schick.LaketranJulia Schick
 
Active Commuting and School Choice Policy
Active Commuting and School Choice PolicyActive Commuting and School Choice Policy
Active Commuting and School Choice PolicyChris Pulley, MPH, CPH
 
Complete Streets & Safe Routes to School
Complete Streets & Safe Routes to SchoolComplete Streets & Safe Routes to School
Complete Streets & Safe Routes to SchoolKarianne Schlosshauer
 
Attitudinal Barriers to the Developm,ent of Safe Routes to School Programs
Attitudinal Barriers to the Developm,ent of Safe Routes to School ProgramsAttitudinal Barriers to the Developm,ent of Safe Routes to School Programs
Attitudinal Barriers to the Developm,ent of Safe Routes to School Programsdmmccants
 
Home school groupfeedback2011
Home school groupfeedback2011Home school groupfeedback2011
Home school groupfeedback2011hawesside
 
1/28/2016 - Active Routes to School
1/28/2016 - Active Routes to School1/28/2016 - Active Routes to School
1/28/2016 - Active Routes to Schoolprofcyclist
 
Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area School Travel Household Attitudinal Study
Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area School Travel Household Attitudinal StudyGreater Toronto and Hamilton Area School Travel Household Attitudinal Study
Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area School Travel Household Attitudinal StudySmart Commute
 
Urban mobility, livelihoods and transport in Dar Es Salaam City: exploring ch...
Urban mobility, livelihoods and transport in Dar Es Salaam City: exploring ch...Urban mobility, livelihoods and transport in Dar Es Salaam City: exploring ch...
Urban mobility, livelihoods and transport in Dar Es Salaam City: exploring ch...Institute for Transport Studies (ITS)
 
Surveying Florida Scholarship Families
Surveying Florida Scholarship FamiliesSurveying Florida Scholarship Families
Surveying Florida Scholarship FamiliesEdChoice
 
Education system
Education systemEducation system
Education systemAlicia Poe
 
Transportation Fee For Busing Follow Up Report July 18, 2013
Transportation Fee For Busing Follow Up Report July 18, 2013Transportation Fee For Busing Follow Up Report July 18, 2013
Transportation Fee For Busing Follow Up Report July 18, 2013ECarverCoSchools
 
Golden Boot Challenge Launch 2011
Golden Boot Challenge Launch 2011Golden Boot Challenge Launch 2011
Golden Boot Challenge Launch 2011hawesside
 
Rancho Running Program 2009
Rancho Running Program 2009Rancho Running Program 2009
Rancho Running Program 2009guestc5db00
 

Similar to SRTS Parent Survey Presentation published (20)

Newton SRTS Conference on survey
Newton SRTS Conference on surveyNewton SRTS Conference on survey
Newton SRTS Conference on survey
 
ACT 2014 San Francisco Safe Routes to School Program
ACT 2014 San Francisco Safe Routes to School ProgramACT 2014 San Francisco Safe Routes to School Program
ACT 2014 San Francisco Safe Routes to School Program
 
STEP Conference 2015 - Stuart Hay, Living Streets - Walking: Can Simple Steps...
STEP Conference 2015 - Stuart Hay, Living Streets - Walking: Can Simple Steps...STEP Conference 2015 - Stuart Hay, Living Streets - Walking: Can Simple Steps...
STEP Conference 2015 - Stuart Hay, Living Streets - Walking: Can Simple Steps...
 
Student Free Fare Program Update: April 19, 2016
Student Free Fare Program Update: April 19, 2016Student Free Fare Program Update: April 19, 2016
Student Free Fare Program Update: April 19, 2016
 
Transitions.Schick.Laketran
Transitions.Schick.LaketranTransitions.Schick.Laketran
Transitions.Schick.Laketran
 
Transitions.Schick.Laketran
Transitions.Schick.LaketranTransitions.Schick.Laketran
Transitions.Schick.Laketran
 
Active Commuting and School Choice Policy
Active Commuting and School Choice PolicyActive Commuting and School Choice Policy
Active Commuting and School Choice Policy
 
Complete Streets & Safe Routes to School
Complete Streets & Safe Routes to SchoolComplete Streets & Safe Routes to School
Complete Streets & Safe Routes to School
 
Attitudinal Barriers to the Developm,ent of Safe Routes to School Programs
Attitudinal Barriers to the Developm,ent of Safe Routes to School ProgramsAttitudinal Barriers to the Developm,ent of Safe Routes to School Programs
Attitudinal Barriers to the Developm,ent of Safe Routes to School Programs
 
Home school groupfeedback2011
Home school groupfeedback2011Home school groupfeedback2011
Home school groupfeedback2011
 
1/28/2016 - Active Routes to School
1/28/2016 - Active Routes to School1/28/2016 - Active Routes to School
1/28/2016 - Active Routes to School
 
Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area School Travel Household Attitudinal Study
Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area School Travel Household Attitudinal StudyGreater Toronto and Hamilton Area School Travel Household Attitudinal Study
Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area School Travel Household Attitudinal Study
 
Urban mobility, livelihoods and transport in Dar Es Salaam City: exploring ch...
Urban mobility, livelihoods and transport in Dar Es Salaam City: exploring ch...Urban mobility, livelihoods and transport in Dar Es Salaam City: exploring ch...
Urban mobility, livelihoods and transport in Dar Es Salaam City: exploring ch...
 
Saferoutestoschool
SaferoutestoschoolSaferoutestoschool
Saferoutestoschool
 
Surveying Florida Scholarship Families
Surveying Florida Scholarship FamiliesSurveying Florida Scholarship Families
Surveying Florida Scholarship Families
 
Education system
Education systemEducation system
Education system
 
Transportation Fee For Busing Follow Up Report July 18, 2013
Transportation Fee For Busing Follow Up Report July 18, 2013Transportation Fee For Busing Follow Up Report July 18, 2013
Transportation Fee For Busing Follow Up Report July 18, 2013
 
Operation Red to Green_Employee Engagement RoadMap
Operation Red to Green_Employee Engagement RoadMapOperation Red to Green_Employee Engagement RoadMap
Operation Red to Green_Employee Engagement RoadMap
 
Golden Boot Challenge Launch 2011
Golden Boot Challenge Launch 2011Golden Boot Challenge Launch 2011
Golden Boot Challenge Launch 2011
 
Rancho Running Program 2009
Rancho Running Program 2009Rancho Running Program 2009
Rancho Running Program 2009
 

SRTS Parent Survey Presentation published

  • 1. C I T Y O F N E W T O N P L A N N I N G D E P A R T M E N T S A F E R O U T E S T O S C H O O L S P R I N G 2 0 1 4 Newton Student Transportation Survey
  • 2. Survey Background  Purpose of Survey  To determine how and why children get to and from school  How it was administered  Survey Monkey link sent via PTO newsletters and Principal emails  Response rate  High response rate, averaging just over 30% of families responded  While range of elementary school responses were 7% - 50% ,12 of the 15 elementary exceeding 20%  Middle school and high school responses were clustered near the 25% average response rate for secondary schools  Mostly positive follow up emails sent by many respondents 2
  • 4. Completed Surveys Elementary 1394 Middle School 773 High School 913 School completed Surveys % of families Mason-Rice 164 50% Cabot 179 46% Zervas 104 43% Pierce 85 35% Bowen 132 35% Countryside 115 33% Lincoln Eliot 89 32% Underwood 80 32% Burr 97 27% Average 92.9 30.6% Horace Mann 95 29% Franklin 78 26% Angier 77 24% Williams 45 18% Ward 31 16% Memorial Spaulding 23 7% Total 1,394 31% School completed surveys % of families Bigelow 104 23% Brown 284 45% Day 252 31% Oak Hill 133 24% Total 773 32% School completed surveys % of families Newton North 472 28% Newton South 441 29% Total 913 29% 4
  • 5. Comments on Survey Data  Underrepresented populations  Schools  MBTA riders  High school drivers  High school bicycle riders  Winter effect  Responses likely slightly over weighted to driving due to timing of survey doesn’t include fair weather walkers/bikers  Distance to school data  Obtained outside of survey process  Limits ability to mine data using Survey Monkey tools  Captures a great deal of additional comments  Highlight specific problems  These deserve further review 5
  • 7. Estimating Daily Trips  GIS data used to determine walking distance for each family from home to school based on main intersections given  Developed transportation mode profile for distance segments based on average survey responses from families that live within that distance segment  Estimated number of trips by mode by applying mode profile to the estimated # of families within that distance segment 7
  • 8. How do students get to and from school? - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 EstimatedDailyTrips All Students * To School From School * Excludes Memorial Spaulding due to low response rate and out-of-district students 8
  • 9. How do students get to and from school? 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 EstimatedDailyTrips Elementary Students* To School From School The family vehicle is the primary way students get to and from school. Average distance walked: 0.49 miles Average distance biked: 0.66 miles * Excludes Memorial Spaulding due to low response rate and out-of-district students 9 45% of elementary parents responding drive every day 35% of elementary parents responding walk every day
  • 10. What did we hear about why choices are made? Elementary • Why we walk? • We want to walk not drive – 566 families • We have no choice – 89 families • Parents leave for work before school starts • No driver available or no car available to drive • Why we drive? • 427 families responded snowy, icy sidewalks is the #1 reason they drive, another 270 listed it as key reason • 300+ responded they are on their way to/from somewhere • 250 responded unsafe crossings as #1 reason they drive 10
  • 11. How do students get to and from school? - 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 EstimatedDailyTrips Middle School Students To School From School Average distance of car trip: 1.23 miles 35% of car trips under 1 mile Average distance walked: 0.83 miles Average distance biked: 1.0 mile Nearly 50% of children driven in the morning walk or take the bus after school. 11
  • 12. How do students get to and from school? 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 EstimatedDailyTrips High School Students To School From School Trips by vehicle is again the primary way students get to and from school. Average distance of car trip: 1.62 miles 18% of car trips under 1 mile Average distance walked: 0.94 miles Average distance biked: 1.49 miles 12
  • 13. What did we hear about why choices are made? Middle School & High School  Responses were similar at both levels • Why we don’t drive? • Primary reason is kids like to walk • Inconvenient to drive • Live very close • Bus is very convenient • 10% of students walk, bike or take the bus as parents leave for work before kids leave for school • 20%+ must walk, bike or take the bus home because of parents’ work schedule • Why we drive? • 24% families stated that snowy, icy sidewalks is the #1 reason they drive their kids TO school • 23% of families think the walk takes too long 13
  • 14. Transportation modes by distance – to school - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 < 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2 mile 1/2 - 1 mile > 1 mile DailyTripstoSchool Distance from home to school Elementary Students Car Pool Family vehicle Riding the bus Biking/ Scootering Walking 14
  • 15. Transportation modes by distance – from school - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 < 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2 mile 1/2 - 1 mile > 1 mile DailyTripsfromSchool Distance from to school to home Elementary Students Car Pool Family vehicle Riding the bus Biking/ Scootering Walking 15
  • 16. Transportation modes by distance – to school - 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 < 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2 mile 1/2 - 1 mile 1 -1 1/2 miles 1 1/2 - 2 miles > 2 miles Dailytripstoschool Distance from home to school Middle School Students Car Pool Family vehicle MBTA School Bus Biking/ Scootering Walking 16
  • 17. Transportation modes by distance – from school - 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 < 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2 mile 1/2 - 1 mile 1 -1 1/2 miles 1 1/2 - 2 miles > 2 miles Dailytripstoschool Distance from to school to home Middle School Students Car Pool Family vehicle MBTA School Bus Biking/ Scootering Walking Nearly 50% of children driven in the morning walk or take the bus after school. 17
  • 18. Transportation modes by distance – to school 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 < 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2 mile 1/2 - 1 mile 1 -1 1/2 miles 1 1/2 - 2 miles > 2 miles Dailytripsfromschool Distance from home to school High School Students Car Pool Drives with other student Drives themselves Family vehicle MBTA School Bus Biking/ Scootering Walking 18
  • 19. Transportation modes by distance – from school 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 < 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2 mile 1/2 - 1 mile 1 -1 1/2 miles 1 1/2 - 2 miles > 2 miles Dailytripsfromschool Distance from school to home High School Students Car Pool Drives with other student Drives themselves Family vehicle MBTA School Bus Biking/ Scootering Walking 19
  • 20. Impacts of current school transportation model  Increased stress on crowded streets and neighborhoods  Decreased air quality  Negative environmental impact  Missed opportunity for active transportation  Exercise  Social time  Improved feeling of well being  Time to think  Better prepared to learn  Sense of accomplishment  Independence 20
  • 21. Assessing sentiment for walkable schools  Parents were asked to rate their feelings on the following statements:  I want to live in a community where most kids walk or bike to school 67% AGREE  I think the City should quickly address structural issues (crosswalks, lights, crossing guards) to make it safer for children to walk to school 84% AGREE  I think the city should enforce the sidewalk snow removal ordinance 84% AGREE  I want the School Committee to make walking to school a priority in establishing school districts 58% AGREE 21
  • 22. What is the mode shift opportunity? - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 < 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2 mile 1/2 - 1 mile > 1 mile TotalDailyTrips Distance from home to school Elementary Students Car Pool Family vehicle Riding the bus Biking/Scoo tering Walking 22
  • 23. Mode shift opportunity at the elementary schools  Make walking and biking for students living within ½ mile of school the primary mode of transportation  increase from 55% to 70% 820 less daily car trips  Increase biking for students living between ½ mile and 1 mile and some increase in walking  increase from 30% to 43%  525 less daily car trips  Increase bus ridership for students who qualify  Increase from 40% to 50%  140 less daily car trips  Encourage carpooling and driving part way for those that do drive  Increase carpools to 10%  360 less daily car trips  Encourage 20% of car trips drive part way  200 less daily car trips 23
  • 24. What is the mode shift opportunity? - 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 < 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2 mile 1/2 - 1 mile 1 -1 1/2 miles 1 1/2 - 2 miles > 2 miles TotalDailyTrips Distance from home to school Middle School Students Car Pool Family vehicle MBTA School Bus Biking/Sco otering Walking 24
  • 25. Mode shift opportunity at the middle schools  Make walking and biking for students living within 1 mile of school the primary mode of transportation  increase from 55% to 70% 200 less daily car trips  Increase biking for students living less than 2 miles from school  increase from 2% to 8%  130 less daily car trips  Increase bus ridership for students who qualify  Increase from 67% to 72%  120 less daily car trips  Encourage carpooling and driving part way for those that do drive  Increase carpools to 6%  120 less daily car trips  Encourage 20% of car trips drive part way  115 less daily car trips 25
  • 26. What is the mode shift opportunity? - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 < 1/4 mile 1/4 to 1/2 mile 1/2 - 1 mile 1 -1 1/2 miles 1 1/2 - 2 miles > 2 miles TotalDailyTrips Distance from home to school High School Students Car Pool Drives with other student Drives themselves Family vehicle MBTA School Bus Biking/Scoote ring Walking 26
  • 27. Mode shift opportunity at the high schools  Make walking and biking for students living within 1 mile of school the primary mode of transportation  increase from 54% to 78% 360 less daily car trips  Increase biking for students living less than 2 miles from school  increase from 3% to 12%  300 less daily car trips  Increase bus ridership for students who qualify  Increase from 39% to 44%  200 less daily car trips  Encourage carpooling and driving part-way for those that do drive  Increase carpools to 7%  230 less daily car trips  Encourage 20% of car trips drive part way  150 less daily car trips 27
  • 28. Summarizing Mode Shift - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Current After Mode Shift Car Pool Drives with other student Drives themselves Family vehicle MBTA School Bus Biking/Scootering Walking 1,500 1,200 450 3,800 28
  • 29. Mode shift goals by school School goals Walking Biking School Bus Vehicle Elementary Schools 35 families at each school 15 families 5 families 10 families to carpool, 20 families to drive part way Middle Schools 25 families 30 families 15 families 15 families to carpool, 20 families to drive part way High Schools 75 families 100 families 50 families 25 families to carpool, 65 families to drive part way 29
  • 30. Estimated Annual Reduction in car trips  Almost 2,000 less car trips per day  Estimated 3,700+ miles per day  180 school days  670,000 miles per year  Achieving this type of mode shift will require motivation for change and the removal of barriers to walking, biking & the bus 30
  • 31. Are parents encouraged to walk & bike?  % that feel their child’s school encourages or strongly encourages walking and biking to school  64% Elementary school  15% Middle School  10% High School  Elementary schools with highest results  Burr, Peirce, Angier, Mason-Rice at 80% 31
  • 32. What did we hear about conditions along routes to school from families that walk/bike/bus?  Top 5 issues from elementary families whose children walk least some of the time  59% observe unsafe driver behavior  40% have issues with broken or cracked sidewalks  40% observe cars that fail to yield to crossing pedestrians  27% have missing sidewalk sections along the route  25% have faded crosswalks  Issues for middle school and high school families are similar  72% of middle school parents observe unsafe driver behavior  Ranking for other issues is very similar 32
  • 33. Impact of weather on walking and biking  Elementary  25% of the regular walkers will still walk in the rain, snow or very cold temperatures  Cold temperatures have the biggest impact driving 55% of regular walkers to likely be driven  Middle School+ High School  Only 15% of the regular walkers will still walk in the rain, snow or very cold temperatures  Again cold temperatures have the biggest impact causing over 60% of regular walkers to likely be driven; snow is a close second at 58% likely to be driven 33
  • 34. What did we hear specifically about snow?  Elementary  89% indicated uncleared sidewalks are an issue  50% of parents responded that uncleared sidewalks along the route cause them to drive to school  Another 39% noted that uncleared sidewalks were an issue but still preferred to walk to school  70% of walking families had issues with snow piles on corners and crosswalks  Middle School & High School  Similiar 34
  • 35. Bus Ridership  Elementary School  1394 respondents  240 eligible, 125 yes take the bus, 115 do not take the bus  283 do not know if student is eligible  Middle School  398 eligible, 342 yes take the bus, 57 do not take the bus  83 do not know if student is eligible  High School  406 eligible, 273 yes take the bus, 133 do not take the bus  108 do not know if student is eligible 35
  • 36. Why elementary school students don’t take bus Before- school or after school activities, 34% Bus fee too high, 34% Do not want children on the bus, 31% Concerns about the safety of walk to bus stop, 13% Bus ride is too long, 13% Bus stop is too far, 11% Bus comes too early, 8% 36
  • 37. Why middle school students don’t take bus Bus fee too high, 41% Bus comes too early, 30% Do not want children on the bus, 27% Bus ride is too long, 25% Bus stop is too far, 20% Before-school or after school activities, 11% Concerns about the safety of walk to bus stop, 11% 37
  • 38. Why high school students don’t take the bus My children do not want to be on the bus, 40% Before-school or after school activities, 33% Bus fee too high, 32% Bus comes too early, 28% Bus ride is too long, 18% Bus stop is too far, 17% Student parking fee more reasonable than bus fee, 13% Do not want children on the bus, 6% Bus leaves school too late, 6% Concerns about the safety of walk to bus stop, 2% % 38
  • 39. Evaluation of MBTA usage  Repeat estimated daily ridership numbers  Middle School  94 have access to MBTA route  513 no access  168 do not know  52 bus (Parker/Centre St.) is 83% of ridership  59 bus (Walnut St.) is 15%  High School  161 have access to MBTA route  557 no access  133 do not know  59 bus (Walnut St.) is 60%  52 bus (Parker/Centre St.) is 30% of ridership  Green line is 13%  Look at key issues faced and any praise 39
  • 40. Summary  High vehicle usage has impact on everyone  Quality of life  Environmental  Cost to city of additional vehicle traffic?  Significant opportunity for mode shift  Next steps?  Encouragement and information on benefits of more walking and biking  Infrastructure improvements and better snow clearing necessary to help aid mode shift  Review of bus policies and schedule  Engage key stakeholders in adopting mode shift goals 40