WSO2 Micro Integrator for Enterprise Integration in a Decentralized, Microser...
Reviewer 1 ao_6073 (Dr Ali Olfati)
1. SDI Review Form 1.6
Created by: EA Checked by: ME Approved by: CEO Version: 1.6 (07-06-2013)
Journal Name: Annual Review & Research in Biology
Manuscript Number: 2013_ARRB_6073
Title of the Manuscript:
In Vitro Rumen Fermentation Characteristics of Intact or Oil Free of Various Protein Sources
Type of the Article Research Paper
General guideline for Peer Review process:
This journal’s peer review policy states that NO manuscript should be rejected only on the basis of ‘lack of Novelty’, provided the manuscript is
scientifically robust and technically sound.
To know the complete guideline for Peer Review process, reviewers are requested to visit this link:
(http://www.sciencedomain.org/page.php?id=sdi-general-editorial-policy#Peer-Review-Guideline)
2. SDI Review Form 1.6
Created by: EA Checked by: ME Approved by: CEO Version: 1.6 (07-06-2013)
PART 1: Review Comments
Reviewer’s comment Author’s comment (if agreed with reviewer,
correct the manuscript and highlight that part in
the manuscript. It is mandatory that authors
should write his/her feedback here)
Compulsory REVISION comments
1. Line 12-13 is not necessary at abstract.
2. Abstract (especially the technical and
statistical details) should be shortened,
only statistical significant results should
be indicated (Abstract is long and should
not more than 250 words).
3. The results need to be explained in detail.
May be you can divide this section into
several subtopics and then discuss each
subtopic separately.
4. In the discussion, as much as possible,
try to discuss one item completely, and
then move on to the next item.
Minor REVISION comments
1. Age rams (line 99-100) must be mention at
3. SDI Review Form 1.6
Created by: EA Checked by: ME Approved by: CEO Version: 1.6 (07-06-2013)
manuscript.
2. English should be improved by native
English speaker; some expressions in the
present text are difficult to understand.
3. The aim of the experiments should be
better justified.
Optional/General comments
1- Some sentences in the manuscript (especially
at introduction) should be rewrite they may
have error of plagiarism.
Reviewer Details:
Name: Ali Olfati
Department, University & Country Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture University of Tabriz, Iran