2. CAMERON
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
๏Thinking about local growth
โข US growing ๏ we should growโฆ
โข Wilmington:
๏ Strong in L&H
๏ Weak in manufacturing
๏ Wont grow the same as USโฆ
โข But people moving to townโฆ
๏ Decompose growth to identify patterns
๏ Roughly:
โข Local = National + Industry diff. + Diff. Regional Rate
3. CAMERON
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
๏Shift and Share Analysis
โข Divides growth into three components
๏ National growth component โ growth at national
rate
๏ If region grows at national rate, maintains its โshareโ
๏ Mix component โ growth difference owing to
differences in initial employment mix
๏ Competitive component โ differences due to
local environment, i.e. permitting,
infrastructure, etc.
๏ Industry โshiftingโ to new region
6. CAMERON
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
๏ Data fairly available
๏ But:
โข Local industry may differ from national
even for a specific sector
๏ Maybe the national level isnโt right benchmark
โข Difficult to select appropriate industry
level
๏ All manufacturing or a specific plantโฆ
๏ i.e. all food processing or only smoked fish
๏ If one plant is industry ๏จ local = national
7. CAMERON
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
๏Data fairly available
๏But:
โข Competitive component can change quickly
โข Past performance may not match future
๏ Difficult to identify cause (regulations, infrastructure,
employee at firm, etc.)