The document summarizes conservation agriculture highlights in Zimbabwe from 2013-2014. Key points include: the signing of a CAADP compact providing a policy framework; establishment of sub-national conservation agriculture platforms in 7 provinces; inclusion of CA in national policy documents; distribution of over 300 no-till planters through a program with Brazil; and registration of ZIMCAN as a legal entity to mobilize resources. Charts show increases in both supported and unsupported conservation agriculture farmers and areas from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013, though average area per farmer remains small. Future plans include assessing impacts to date and addressing challenges to scaling up adoption.
2. Highlights for 2013/2014
• CAADP Compact- Signed Nov,2013- provides policy
framework for action
• Establishment of Sub-national CSA platforms in 7 of the
8 provinces-improve representation at National level
and correctly inform on prevailing issues
• Inclusion of CA in major National policy documents-
ZIM-ASSET, Food & Nutrition Security Policy
• “ More Food Programme ” by Govt of Zimbabwe &
Brazil- >300 of the equipment are No-Till planters
• Registration of ZIMCAN as a legal entity- will allow for
resource mobilization & enhancement of activities and
networking
3. Number of Supported & Unsupported CA
farmers
-
50,000.00
100,000.00
150,000.00
200,000.00
250,000.00
300,000.00
350,000.00
400,000.00
Number of farmers Area (Ha) number of farmers Area (Ha)
2011/2012 2012/2013
Farmers with input support
Farmers without input support
Totals
4. Future perspectives
• Follow up on outcomes of initiated activities: sub-
national platforms, capacity building initiatives
• Focus on assessing impact of CA activities to
date
• Assessment of approaches used to address
adoption challenges
• Increase efforts in documentation
• Promotion of CA in all farming sectors up-scaling
• ZIMCAN- modalities to for the new TRUST to
function effectively
5. Conclusion
• Big strides have been made in terms of CA
awareness(increasing no. of adopters) but need to
address challenges to up-scaling- from “dig & die”
to “dig &eat”
• Although number of farmers have increased,
average area per farmer remains small (labour?,
perception?)
• Evidence of impact at household level, but still
insignificant at National level due to limited area.
• limited evidence on socio-economic benefits,
evidence beyond field level