Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
1509 webinar oligometa lung
1. Management of Oligometastatic
Lung Cancer
Yong Chan Ahn, MD/PhD
Dept. of Radiation Oncology
Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
2. • Oligometastasis
• Oligometastasis in NSCLC
• SMC Experience of SBRT for
Oligometastasis to Lung
• Local Treatment for Oligometastasis
• Clinical Studies/Review
• Survey
• Ongoing Trials
• Take Home Messages
5. Oligometastasis
• Theory 1st proposed by Hellman and
Weichselbaum in 1995.
• Along spectrum of locally confined to widely
metastatic cancer, there exists intermediate
“oligometastatic state” where metastases are
limited in number and location.
Paradigm Stages
Old Early vs Metastatic
New Early ~ Oligometastatic ~ Systemic
Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011
6. Oligometastasis
• Eradication of “oligometastases” with local
ablative Tx could be curative in select patients.
• Cure is achieved following curative surgical
resection in:
– Liver metastases from colon cancer
– Lung metastases from various sites
– Adrenal metastases from lung cancer
Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011
7. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011
Single & DFI 36 months
Multiple or DFI < 36 months
Multiple and DFI < 36 months
Lung meta
8. Oligometastasis
• Oligometastases have long been recognized as
potentially curable, but were considered rare
exceptions to cancer metastasis paradigm.
• Oligometastatic state, however, is becoming
more frequently identified with more
sensitive methods.
• Clinicians will be able to limit ablative local
Tx to only those with true oligometastases.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011
15. Lung Cancer, 2013
Conclusion
• Patient selection is key determinant:
– Definitive Tx of primary tumor
– Long disease-free interval
– Lack of intra-thoracic nodal metastasis
• These should be utilized to guide clinical
decision making and design of future studies.
24. Presence of extrathoracic disease was
the only significant factor (p=0.049)
on multivariate analysis.
64.0% vs 38.9%
at 3 years
66.1% vs 0%
at 3 years 71.1% vs 51.1%
at 3 years
Acta Oncol, 2012
25. Conclusion
• SBRT for single or oligo-metastasis seems
quite effective and safe.
• Tumor size, disease-free interval, and presence
of extrathoracic disease are prognosticators for
survival.
Acta Oncol, 2012
31. Clinical Practice Points
• Select oligometastatic NSCLC Pts might benefit
from aggressive Tx to all disease sites:
– Pts with controlled primary lung cancer are
most likely to experience long-term survival.
– Pts with metachronous meta experienced the
longest survivals.
– Pts with synchronous meta and N1-2 disease
had the poorest survivals.
Clinical Lung Cancer, 2014
33. • Radiation therapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Salama JK, Schild SE. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015;34(2):183-93.
• Stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastases to the lung: a
phase 2 study. Nuyttens JJ et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91(2):337-43.
• Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease. Hanna GG et
al. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2015;27(5):290-7.
• Predictive factors for local control in primary and metastatic lung
tumours after four to five fraction stereotactic ablative body
radiotherapy: a single institution's comprehensive experience. Thibault
I et al. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014;26(11):713-9.
• Outcomes and toxicities of stereotactic body radiation therapy for
non-spine bone oligometastases. Owen D et al. Pract Radiat Oncol.
2014;4(2):e143-9.
• Management of pulmonary oligometastases by stereotactic body
radiotherapy. Gamsiz H et al. Tumori. 2014;100(2):179-83.
• Radical treatment of synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell
lung carcinoma (NSCLC): patient outcomes and prognostic factors.
Griffioen GH et al. Lung Cancer. 2013;82(1):95-102.
34. • Reviews:
• SABR for aggressive local therapy of metastatic cancer: A new
paradigm for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Westover KD et al.
Lung Cancer. 2015;89(2):87-93.
• Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases
and oligometastatic lung cancer. Shultz DB et al. J Thorac Oncol.
2014;9(10):1426-33.
37. • 25-question survey
• 1,007 respondents from 43
countries
• SBRT users:
• Length of practice
• # patients treated
• Organs treated
• Primary reason
• Dose schedules
• Future intentions
• SBRT non-users:
• Reason for not using SBRT
• Future intentions
83%
>1/3
Am J Clin Oncol, 2015
38. Reasons for adopting SBRT to treat OM
84%
• Commonly treated organs: lung (90%), liver
(75%), and spine (70%).
• Most would offer second SBRT to new OM.
• 99% planned to continue and 66% planned to
increase SBRT use.
Various dose schedules!
Am J Clin Oncol, 2015
39. Reasons for planning to adopt SBRT
• The most common reasons for not using SBRT were lack of
clinical efficacy (48%) and/or lack of necessary image guidance
equipment (34%). need for prospective clinical trials!
• Of those not using SBRT, 59% plan to start soon.
Am J Clin Oncol, 2015
46. Take Home Messages
• Proportion of patients with OM has been increasing.
• Management of OM has become challenging.
• Patients selection is very important:
– Controlled primary
– Long DFI (metachronous >> synchronous)
– Initially low cN stages
• Consider high dose aggressive local RT (SBRT,
IMRT, IGRT, Particle…) to favorable subgroups.