SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
Administration of justice in Bombay  1668- 1726
ISLAND OF BOMBAY PORTUGUESE WERE THE FIRST EUROPEAN TO ACQUIRE THE ISLAND OF BOMBAY IN 1534, FROM THE KING OF GUJARAT. IN 1661, PORTUGUESE KING, ALFONSUS VI TRANSFERRED THE ISLAND TO CHARLES II AS DOWRY ON THE MARRIAGE OF HIS SISTER CATHERINE WITH THE BRITISH KING. CHARLES II TRANSFERRED IT TO THE EAST INDIA COMPANY IN 1668 FOR AN INSIGNIFICANT ANNUAL RENT OF 10 POUNDS.
JUDICIAL SYSTEM BEFORE 1726, THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN THE ISLAND OF BOMBAY GREW IN THREE STAGES: FIRST STAGE: 1668- 1683 SECOND STAGE: 1683- 1690 THIRD STAGE: 1718- 1726
FIRST PERIOD 1668- 1683 CHARTER OF 1668. JUDICIAL SYSTEM      SURAT PRESIDENCY(GOVERNOR AND COUNCIL)                                 BOMBAY
FIRST JUDICIAL SYSTEM GERALD AUNGIER, GOVERNOR OF SURAT, ARCHITECT OF FIRST JUDICIAL SYSTEM, IN 1670.             BOMBAY DIVIDED INTO 2 DIVISIONS EACH DIVISION HAD ONE COURT WITH 5 JUDGES. THE CUSTOM OFFICER WAS TO BE PRISIDENT OF THE COURT.
JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF 1672 NEW SYSTEM CONSISTED OF GEORGE WILCOX AS JUDGE. THE COURT WAS TO HAVE JURISDICTION IN ALL CASES CIVIL,  CRIMINAL, PROBATE AND TESTAMENTARY. BOMBAY WAS DIVIDED INTO 4 SECTIONS. JUSTICES OF PEACE WERE APPOINTED. COURT OF CONSCIENCE
SECOND PERIOD: 1684- 1690 DR. JOHN ST JOHN  WAS A PERSON LEARNED IN THE CIVIL LAW. CHARTER OF 1683. KING’S BENCH OF COMMON PLEAS. 1690 BOMBAY ATTACKED BY ADMIRAL SIDDI. 1690- 1718 IS THE DARK PERIOD IN LEGAL HISTORY OF ISLAND. 1687 BOMBAY BECAME PRESIDENCY.
THIRD PERIOD: 1718- 1726 IN 1718, A COURT APPEARED AGAIN IN BOMBAY WITH CHIEF JUSTICE AND NINE OTHER JUDGES, OF WHOM 5 WERE BRITISH. INDIANS WERE CALLED BLACK JUSTICES. AWARDED IMPRISONMENT ‘DURING PLEASURE’,  WHICH MEANT INDEFINITE PERIOD OF INCARCERATION.
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AT CALCUTTA 1690- 1726 MUGHAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM. KAZIS AND COURTS. NAWAB’S COURTS.

More Related Content

What's hot

Administration of Justice in Madras
Administration of Justice in MadrasAdministration of Justice in Madras
Administration of Justice in Madras
Aditi Agarwal
 
Give a brief account of development of legal
Give a brief account of development of legalGive a brief account of development of legal
Give a brief account of development of legal
Cheshta Sharma
 

What's hot (20)

Privy council
Privy councilPrivy council
Privy council
 
Administration of Justice in Madras
Administration of Justice in MadrasAdministration of Justice in Madras
Administration of Justice in Madras
 
Judicial plan of 1772
Judicial plan of 1772Judicial plan of 1772
Judicial plan of 1772
 
Charter of 1726
Charter of 1726Charter of 1726
Charter of 1726
 
Cossijurah case
Cossijurah caseCossijurah case
Cossijurah case
 
1773 regulating act with case
1773 regulating act with case1773 regulating act with case
1773 regulating act with case
 
Charter of 1726 uniform judicial system & 1753
Charter of 1726 uniform judicial system  & 1753Charter of 1726 uniform judicial system  & 1753
Charter of 1726 uniform judicial system & 1753
 
Duties of an advocate towards his client
Duties of an advocate towards his clientDuties of an advocate towards his client
Duties of an advocate towards his client
 
Give a brief account of development of legal
Give a brief account of development of legalGive a brief account of development of legal
Give a brief account of development of legal
 
Charter of 1600
Charter of 1600Charter of 1600
Charter of 1600
 
Development of judicial system in madras
Development of judicial system in madras Development of judicial system in madras
Development of judicial system in madras
 
Beneficial construction
Beneficial constructionBeneficial construction
Beneficial construction
 
1773 regulating act and the famous case laws
1773 regulating act and the famous case laws1773 regulating act and the famous case laws
1773 regulating act and the famous case laws
 
second law comission
second law comission second law comission
second law comission
 
1726 Charter
1726 Charter1726 Charter
1726 Charter
 
BAR COUNCILs
BAR COUNCILsBAR COUNCILs
BAR COUNCILs
 
REGULATING ACT 1773
REGULATING ACT 1773REGULATING ACT 1773
REGULATING ACT 1773
 
Hindu joint family
Hindu joint family Hindu joint family
Hindu joint family
 
Bar council of india and the State Bar Councils
Bar council of india and the State Bar CouncilsBar council of india and the State Bar Councils
Bar council of india and the State Bar Councils
 
Noscitor a sociis
Noscitor a sociisNoscitor a sociis
Noscitor a sociis
 

Viewers also liked (7)

Administration of justice
Administration of justiceAdministration of justice
Administration of justice
 
Administration of justice
Administration of justiceAdministration of justice
Administration of justice
 
ADMJ2 Ch 1 - Introduction to Administration of Justice
ADMJ2 Ch 1 - Introduction to Administration of JusticeADMJ2 Ch 1 - Introduction to Administration of Justice
ADMJ2 Ch 1 - Introduction to Administration of Justice
 
Judicial measures of lord cornwallis
Judicial measures of lord cornwallisJudicial measures of lord cornwallis
Judicial measures of lord cornwallis
 
East india company on 2nd
East india company on 2ndEast india company on 2nd
East india company on 2nd
 
Presentation on Right To information Act 2005
Presentation on  Right  To information Act 2005Presentation on  Right  To information Act 2005
Presentation on Right To information Act 2005
 
Structure of Indian judiciary
Structure of Indian judiciaryStructure of Indian judiciary
Structure of Indian judiciary
 

Administration of justice in bombay

  • 1. Administration of justice in Bombay 1668- 1726
  • 2. ISLAND OF BOMBAY PORTUGUESE WERE THE FIRST EUROPEAN TO ACQUIRE THE ISLAND OF BOMBAY IN 1534, FROM THE KING OF GUJARAT. IN 1661, PORTUGUESE KING, ALFONSUS VI TRANSFERRED THE ISLAND TO CHARLES II AS DOWRY ON THE MARRIAGE OF HIS SISTER CATHERINE WITH THE BRITISH KING. CHARLES II TRANSFERRED IT TO THE EAST INDIA COMPANY IN 1668 FOR AN INSIGNIFICANT ANNUAL RENT OF 10 POUNDS.
  • 3. JUDICIAL SYSTEM BEFORE 1726, THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN THE ISLAND OF BOMBAY GREW IN THREE STAGES: FIRST STAGE: 1668- 1683 SECOND STAGE: 1683- 1690 THIRD STAGE: 1718- 1726
  • 4. FIRST PERIOD 1668- 1683 CHARTER OF 1668. JUDICIAL SYSTEM SURAT PRESIDENCY(GOVERNOR AND COUNCIL) BOMBAY
  • 5. FIRST JUDICIAL SYSTEM GERALD AUNGIER, GOVERNOR OF SURAT, ARCHITECT OF FIRST JUDICIAL SYSTEM, IN 1670. BOMBAY DIVIDED INTO 2 DIVISIONS EACH DIVISION HAD ONE COURT WITH 5 JUDGES. THE CUSTOM OFFICER WAS TO BE PRISIDENT OF THE COURT.
  • 6. JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF 1672 NEW SYSTEM CONSISTED OF GEORGE WILCOX AS JUDGE. THE COURT WAS TO HAVE JURISDICTION IN ALL CASES CIVIL, CRIMINAL, PROBATE AND TESTAMENTARY. BOMBAY WAS DIVIDED INTO 4 SECTIONS. JUSTICES OF PEACE WERE APPOINTED. COURT OF CONSCIENCE
  • 7. SECOND PERIOD: 1684- 1690 DR. JOHN ST JOHN WAS A PERSON LEARNED IN THE CIVIL LAW. CHARTER OF 1683. KING’S BENCH OF COMMON PLEAS. 1690 BOMBAY ATTACKED BY ADMIRAL SIDDI. 1690- 1718 IS THE DARK PERIOD IN LEGAL HISTORY OF ISLAND. 1687 BOMBAY BECAME PRESIDENCY.
  • 8. THIRD PERIOD: 1718- 1726 IN 1718, A COURT APPEARED AGAIN IN BOMBAY WITH CHIEF JUSTICE AND NINE OTHER JUDGES, OF WHOM 5 WERE BRITISH. INDIANS WERE CALLED BLACK JUSTICES. AWARDED IMPRISONMENT ‘DURING PLEASURE’, WHICH MEANT INDEFINITE PERIOD OF INCARCERATION.
  • 9. ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AT CALCUTTA 1690- 1726 MUGHAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM. KAZIS AND COURTS. NAWAB’S COURTS.