LEEDigation:  The Impact of LEED 3.0, Litigation & Building Regulation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

LEEDigation: The Impact of LEED 3.0, Litigation & Building Regulation

  • 1,508 views
Uploaded on

Presentation at the 2010 Green Matters Conference in New Orleans, LA, scheduled for Friday, October 15th. Scott Wolfe is co-presenting this topic with Chris Hill, focusing on Litigation caused by......

Presentation at the 2010 Green Matters Conference in New Orleans, LA, scheduled for Friday, October 15th. Scott Wolfe is co-presenting this topic with Chris Hill, focusing on Litigation caused by or associated with the LEED Certification Process. This is the powerpoint presentation that will be used.

More in: Real Estate
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,508
On Slideshare
1,458
From Embeds
50
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
28
Comments
0
Likes
1

Embeds 50

http://www.constructionlawmonitor.com 50

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • Introduction
  • Before talking about the specific (green building litigation), it’s important to get a grasp on general construction litigation...and what causes this type of litigation.
  • Generally, litigation arises because of unfulfilled expectations.
  • Generally, litigation arises because of unfulfilled expectations.
  • Generally, litigation arises because of unfulfilled expectations.
  • Generally, litigation arises because of unfulfilled expectations.
  • Before specifying what causes green building litigation and how to prevent it, an overview of just what green building is could be prudent. The presentation title focuses on LEED, but we should try to keep discussion broad to encompass green building in general.
  • From the LEED website, defining LEED
  • A “competitor” of the LEED Certification Process
  • EPA’s Energy Star Ratings and Standards
  • A basic definition for “green building”
  • What exactly is LEEDigation, and how is it different from ordinary litigation?
  • Introduction

  • This debate between Gary Cole and Matt DeVries really underscores the point of our presentation, and that is, how does green building issues bring anything unique to the practice of law and the world of litigation. How? It provides attorneys and clients with new risks to be allocated and managed. It presents unique “damages” situations. It adds new parties to the fold, and the like.
  • Generally, litigation arises because of unfulfilled expectations. The same thing for LEED or other green building projects...its just different expectations.
  • Generally, litigation arises because of unfulfilled expectations. The same thing for LEED or other green building projects...its just different expectations.
  • Generally, litigation arises because of unfulfilled expectations. The same thing for LEED or other green building projects...its just different expectations.
  • Is all this hypothetical, or is it probable to happen? The next slides take a look at some figures about the growth of green building. There’s no reason to believe that green building disputes will be “immune” to litigation.


  • How are these green building cases going to be resolved? Unfortunately, no one really knows right now.







  • These green building cases present unique damages issues.






  • How Do You Prepare for these green building vulnerabilities?
  • How Do You Prepare for these green building vulnerabilities?
  • How Do You Prepare for these green building vulnerabilities?
















  • A basic definition for “green washing”
  • A basic definition for “green washing”
  • A basic definition for “green washing”
  • Done!

Transcript

  • 1. LEEDigation The Impact of LEED on the Practice of Law Christopher Hill Scott Wolfe The Law Office of Wolfe Law Group Christopher G Hill, P.C. Louisiana | Washington Virginia wolfelaw.com christopherhill-law.com constructionlawmonitor.com constructionlawva.com LEED AP LEED AP
  • 2. What is Construction Litigation?
  • 3. Unmet Expectations
  • 4. Unmet Expectations • Cost: The project cost more than expected
  • 5. Unmet Expectations • Cost: The project cost more than expected • Scope: The project’s scope was more expansive than anticipated
  • 6. Unmet Expectations • Cost: The project cost more than expected • Scope: The project’s scope was more expansive than anticipated • Schedule: Completion took longer than planned
  • 7. Unmet Expectations • Cost: The project cost more than expected • Scope: The project’s scope was more expansive than anticipated • Schedule: Completion took longer than planned • Quality: The workmanship quality was inferior to expectations.
  • 8. What is LEED?
  • 9. http://www.usgbc.org
  • 10. http://www.nahbgreen.org
  • 11. http://www.energystar.gov
  • 12. What is Green Building? also known as green construction or sustainable building, is the practice of creating structures and using processes that are environmentally responsible and resource-efficient throughout a building's life-cycle: from siting to design, construction, operation, maintenance, renovation, and deconstruction. This practice expands and complements the classical building design concerns of economy, utility, durability, and comfort. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_building
  • 13. LEEDigation What is LEEDigation?
  • 14. LEEDigation Is it Different Than Ordinary Litigation?
  • 15. Law Ark Building Blog “ The bad news is that attorneys, especially those already practicing in construction law, will soon realize that aside from green design and construction’s sometimes specialized and occasionally ill-defined vernacular, there’s no real novelty in the types of claims that might arise. No new frontiers of jurisprudence need be explored–a leaky green roof is still a leaky roof–whether it also requires regular mowing and landscape maintenance changes little from a legal perspective. http://www.lawarkbuilding.com/?p=104
  • 16. Best Practices Construction Blog “ Cole may be right that there is no novelty to the traditional types of claims (contract, tort, statutory, etc.) that may arise in green construction disputes. However, the novelty in the green building industry is the new set of standards that will inevitably become part of the legal dispute. In other words, while “a leaky green roof is still a leaky roof” … there will be new risks to be allocated, different types of damages lost, additional players involved, varied proof required and, yes, perhaps a novel cause of action alleged because that leaky green roof system failed.  http://bit.ly/diszmS
  • 17. Still... Unmet Expectations
  • 18. Still... Unmet Expectations • Energy Performance: Is the building’s energy systems performing as expected (or promised)?
  • 19. Still... Unmet Expectations • Energy Performance: Is the building’s energy systems performing as expected (or promised)? • Rating: Did the building achieve the planned LEED rating or other certification?
  • 20. Still... Unmet Expectations • Energy Performance: Is the building’s energy systems performing as expected (or promised)? • Rating: Did the building achieve the planned LEED rating or other certification? • Long-Term Sustainability: What is the project’s impact on the environment, and is this as expected?
  • 21. Is Litigation Probable?
  • 22. “ Green Growth is phenomenal across the globe. Harvey M. Bernstein, McGraw-Hill Construction
  • 23. 2005 - 2008 Green Building Construction Grows 5x ($10b to $49b) 2009 - 2013 Could Triple, reaching $140b Green Outlook 2009: McGraw-Hill Trends Driving Change Report
  • 24. How’s It Going to End?
  • 25. Shaw Development v. Southern Builders
  • 26. Shaw Development v. Southern Builders • Problem: Contract required building to meet Silver Certification. It didn’t.
  • 27. Shaw Development v. Southern Builders • Problem: Contract required building to meet Silver Certification. It didn’t. • Whose Fault?: Developer sued builder, but there was no clear allocation in contract of who was responsible for certification
  • 28. Shaw Development v. Southern Builders • Problem: Contract required building to meet Silver Certification. It didn’t. • Whose Fault?: Developer sued builder, but there was no clear allocation in contract of who was responsible for certification • Damages: $700k+ in lost tax credits
  • 29. Shaw Development v. Southern Builders • Problem: Contract required building to meet Silver Certification. It didn’t. • Whose Fault?: Developer sued builder, but there was no clear allocation in contract of who was responsible for certification • Damages: $700k+ in lost tax credits • Result: Unknown - Settled.
  • 30. Washington DC v. Washington Nationals
  • 31. Washington DC v. Washington Nationals • Problem: Expectations for “Green” LED Scoreboard wasn’t met. Owner claimed project wasn’t substantially complete and withheld funds.
  • 32. Washington DC v. Washington Nationals • Problem: Expectations for “Green” LED Scoreboard wasn’t met. Owner claimed project wasn’t substantially complete and withheld funds. • Damages: Not too clear in settlement materials released, but $3.5 Million was withheld based in large part on the scoreboard dispute.
  • 33. Washington DC v. Washington Nationals • Problem: Expectations for “Green” LED Scoreboard wasn’t met. Owner claimed project wasn’t substantially complete and withheld funds. • Damages: Not too clear in settlement materials released, but $3.5 Million was withheld based in large part on the scoreboard dispute. • Result: Unknown - Settled.
  • 34. What Are The Damages?
  • 35. Show Me The Money!
  • 36. Show Me The Money! • Tax Credits: Missing a certificate level can effect tax credit eligibility
  • 37. Show Me The Money! • Tax Credits: Missing a certificate level can effect tax credit eligibility • Energy Efficiency: If property is not as energy efficient as promised, damages can include increased energy costs
  • 38. Unique Damage Situations
  • 39. Unique Damage Situations • Missing Certification: If a property expects to have Gold certification, but only gets Silver, and this doesn’t have any tax credit implications...what are the damages?
  • 40. Unique Damage Situations • Missing Certification: If a property expects to have Gold certification, but only gets Silver, and this doesn’t have any tax credit implications...what are the damages? • Goodwill: How will courts calculate loss of good will if green construction misses expectations.
  • 41. Unique Liability Situations
  • 42. Unique Liability Situations • LEED Responsibility Allocation: Responsibility for LEED points is distributed between architect, owner and contractor. If energy efficiency is not as expected, how do you assign liability?
  • 43. Unique Liability Situations • LEED Responsibility Allocation: Responsibility for LEED points is distributed between architect, owner and contractor. If energy efficiency is not as expected, how do you assign liability? • Energy Efficiency: Energy efficiency of a building relies on factors: (i) climate; (ii) property placement; (iii) property use; (iv) etc. How do you clearly blame a party for inefficiencies.
  • 44. Preparing for the Risk
  • 45. Preparing for the Risk • Control Expectations
  • 46. Preparing for the Risk • Control Expectations • Limit Exposure By Contract
  • 47. Preparing for the Risk • Control Expectations • Limit Exposure By Contract • Be Careful, and Keep It Simple
  • 48. Control Expectations “ ...Expect the unexpected. Always sounds like good advice. Except, of course, if you are expecting the unexpected, then well then it really isn't really unexpected anymore. Is it? And that leaves you vulnerable to the truly unexpected. Because, you're not expecting it.
  • 49. Control Expectations
  • 50. Control Expectations • Clear terms identifying scope of work
  • 51. Control Expectations • Clear terms identifying scope of work • Clear terms in Subcontracts
  • 52. Control Expectations • Clear terms identifying scope of work • Clear terms in Subcontracts • Very specific specifications, making them as independent from specific certifications as possible
  • 53. Control Expectations • Clear terms identifying scope of work • Clear terms in Subcontracts • Very specific specifications, making them as independent from specific certifications as possible • Get team together ahead of time (BIM, Charette)
  • 54. Shaw Development v. Southern Builders Contract required “Silver LEED Certification,” but lacked clear specifications. Two lessons: - Builder’s obligation to achieve certification and build to specs must be aligned; - Certification is not a guarantee, and architects / builders should be weary of promising a certification.
  • 55. Limit Risk in Contract
  • 56. Limit Risk in Contract • Avoid warranties of long term energy performance
  • 57. Limit Risk in Contract • Avoid warranties of long term energy performance • Set performance expectations at time building complete, not some time in future
  • 58. Limit Risk in Contract • Avoid warranties of long term energy performance • Set performance expectations at time building complete, not some time in future • Clearly allocate responsibilities between owner, builder and architect
  • 59. Limit Risk in Contract • Avoid warranties of long term energy performance • Set performance expectations at time building complete, not some time in future • Clearly allocate responsibilities between owner, builder and architect • Get LEED AP to consult
  • 60. Things That Affect A Building’s Energy Performance A building’s energy performance can be a very complex matter, affected by things out of the builder / architect’s control: - Climate - Use and Users of Building - Third Party Interference
  • 61. Allocate Responsibility The LEED Program allocates responsibility for points between the Owner, Builder and Architect. It is an error to not allocate responsibility for green building design and construction when contracting.
  • 62. Non-Contractual Actions
  • 63. Non-Contractual Actions • Check and Double Check Subcontractors’ and Consultants’ Credentials
  • 64. Non-Contractual Actions • Check and Double Check Subcontractors’ and Consultants’ Credentials • Be Careful with Advertising. Keep it Simple and Don’t Greenwash.
  • 65. Non-Contractual Actions • Check and Double Check Subcontractors’ and Consultants’ Credentials • Be Careful with Advertising. Keep it Simple and Don’t Greenwash. • Require Communication in Contract
  • 66. Non-Contractual Actions • Check and Double Check Subcontractors’ and Consultants’ Credentials • Be Careful with Advertising. Keep it Simple and Don’t Greenwash. • Require Communication in Contract • Consider Green Building Insurance
  • 67. What is Green Washing? Greenwashing (green whitewash) is the practice of companies disingenuously spinning their products and policies as environmentally friendly, such as by presenting cost cuts as reductions in use of resources. It is a deceptive use of green PR or green marketing. The term green sheen has similarly been used to describe organizations that attempt to show that they are adopting practices beneficial to the environment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwash
  • 68. Novel Insurance Products • Green Washing Insurance • Green Certification Insurance • Heightened Risk caused by certain green building practices like Vegetative Roofing, Alternative Energy Generational Systems, etc.
  • 69. LEEDigation The Impact of LEED on the Practice of Law Scott Wolfe Christopher Hill Wolfe Law Group The Law Office of Louisiana | Washington Christopher G Hill, P.C. wolfelaw.com Virginia constructionlawmonitor.com christopherhill-law.com LEED AP constructionlawva.com LEED AP