Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Improvement Through Cisgenics®
1. Perennial Ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.) Improvement Through Cisgenics® Sathish Puthigae
2. Dedicated to the memory of Oluf L . Gamborg (1924–2007) SIVB 2005 Lifetime Distinguished Achievement Award Winner
3. Pastoral Genomics is funded by Meat and Wool NZ, Fonterra, AgResearch, Deer Industry NZ, FRST and Dairy InSight Mission
4. Our Meat, Dairy, Wool and Deer industries rely on productive pasture for their international low-cost and high-quality positions. Biotechnology will give the greatest stepwise and sustainable improvement in pasture productivity. We will use our in-depth knowledge of pasture genomes to enhance conventional breeding. Pastoral Genomics will use ryegrass genes in ryegrass, clover genes in clover to capture the untapped genetic potential in pasture plants. Introduction
5. Data from DEXCEL 2002 Condensed tannins Availability of Ryegrass in New Zealand Winter Spring Summer Autumn Feed demand and supply 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 June September December March Pasture growth, herd demand (kg DM/ha/day) Drought/Temp tolerance Flowering Pasture Growth Herd Demand
10. Cisgenics® in the science literature: One idea, many expressions Combination of Intra- and Cisgenics® TBA Precision Breeding (Rommens et al.) Intermediate between Schouten and Conner. Achievable in part today; more later. Functional units of endogenous genome (promoters, CDS, etc. in new combinations – we would reserve the right to omit introns) Cisgenics® (Hanley et al.) Like WideHyb approach; difficult to detect (create call for sequence-specific tags to identify GMO?) Cassette-sized fragments of sexually-compatible genome e.g. whole gene with own regulatory elements, introns etc. “ Cisgenics” (Schouten et al.) Likely to be able to do almost anything transgenics can do Recognizable (via BLAST) fragments of endogenous genome in any order Intragenics (Conner et al.) Unique aspects Recombinable unit Flavour
11. Continuum in GM approaches Traditional crop breeding Wide hybrids and induced mutations GM crops with no foreign DNA GM crops with foreign vectors GM crops with transgenes GM crops with synthetic genes
14. EST’s, 15 years on, how do they do? dbEST release 062207; Summary by Organism – 22 June 2007; Uni Gene count 19 July 2007 1 276 692 EST entries 1 211 418 EST entries Arabidopsis thaliana Oryza sativa Number of UniGene entries
16. The ryegrass genome is comprised of islands of genes nestled among oceans of repetitive junk DNA*. Genomic subclones are generated by fragmenting DNA from ryegrass. Methyl filtration leaves behind only the ‘genespace’ *Rabinowicz et al . ‘ Differential methylation of genes and retrotransposons facilitates shotgun sequencing of the maize genome’ in Nature Genetics 1999 23(11): 305-9 Project completed GeneThresher™ Methyl filtration leaves behind only the ‘genespace’
26. SAGE ™ : S erial A nalysis of G ene E xpression 11 1 3 3 1 1 Compare with other libraries In planta functional genomics Genes Promoters Rice/Ryegrass
30. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation technique developed using the variety Tolosa is now extended to varieties Impact (diploid) and Banquet (tetraploid) Biotech assisted GM ryegrass varieties Adapted from: Bajaj et al. A high throughput Agrobacterium tumefaciens -mediated transformation method for functional genomics of perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.). Plant Cell Reports 2006 25(7): 651-659
32. Validation of elements required for Cisgenics® Transfer border sequences P-DNA - 2 different right border sequences identified - 1 left border sequence identified Borders tested using 2xCaMV35S::Hpt::35S 3’UTR as sample construct T-DNA Plants growing on Hygromycin selection medium T-DNA (control) P-DNA (ORF128)
33. Perennial ryegrass promoters - inducible (drought) - constitutive Validation of elements required for Cisgenics®
34. Drought tolerant Cisgenic® perennial ryegrass cultivars Genes for targeted traits Predicted temperature and precipitation for New Zealand in 75 years (data from NIWA)
38. Drought tolerant Cisgenic® perennial ryegrass cultivars Genes developed with PG IP – ORF4 & ORF12 Drought tolerance – Transcription factors
39.
40.
41. Zac Hanley Shivendra Bajaj Catherine Bryant Kerry Templeton Geoff Gill Margaret Biswas Kieran Elborough David Whittaker Jonathan Phillips Claudia Smith-Espinoza Nimali Withana Catherine Carter Anke Rintelmann Robert Winz Muhannad Al-Wahb Paul Bickerstaff Plus Researchers at: Orion Genomics, Dexcel, HortResearch, AgResearch, MetaHelix, University of Florida, Cold Spring Harbor Lab, University of Manchester, Crop&Food, Phytowelt, Eurogene, Scion (ForestResearch), University of Chile Acknowledgement
Editor's Notes
I wish to thank the organizers for giving me the opportunity to present before you our research accomplishments in perennial ryegrass to date. Before I do just that I would like to tell you who we are. Pastoral Genomics is the sole investment by the New Zealand pastoral industries into forage improvement through biotechnology. We are funded by Meat and Wool NZ, Fonterra, AgResearch, Deer Industry NZ, FRST and Dairy InSight. Our research focus is in the area of Cisgenics® and MAS in clover and ryegrass.
Our Meat, Dairy, Wool and Deer industries rely on productive pasture for their international low-cost and high quality positions. Biotechnology will give the greatest stepwise and sustainable improvement in pasture productivity. We will use our in-depth knowledge of pasture genomes to enhance conventional breeding. Pastoral Genomics will use ryegrass genes in ryegrass, clover genes in clover to capture the untapped genetic potential in pasture plants.
This slide shows the supply and demand for perennial ryegrass in New Zealand pastures. As anywhere else in the world, growth in spring and summer is almost twice during autumn and winter, a period when New Zealand cows are gestating and calving. The decrease in biomass can be attributed to the effects of drought and low temperature as well as the re-routing of energy by the plant from biomass to the production of floral tillers and seeds. Also, throughout the year there is a underlying need for increased condensed tannins to ensure animal health. Given this background it is easy for anyone to predict what our area of research priorities are.
Earlier on, I had mentioned that Pastoral Genomics has adopted Cisgenics® over transgenics as the preferred tool for plant improvement. I will now dwell a bit more and explain what is Cisgenics®
A cisgenic® organism is a transgenic organism with a subtle but critical difference. A cisgenic® organism is a transgenic organism where elements of the organism’s own genome are used in place of elements from other genomes. So, no elephant genes in daisies or toad genes in potatoes. There are many things that cannot be done via this approach, and transgenic option will be required now and perhaps always.
Why is that we are subscribing to cisgenics®? It is because of the common perceptions of GM crops held world-wide and also because of New Zealand-specific geo-political realities. We believe cisgenics® could be favourably assessed over transgenics under these constraints.
A cisgenic® product is a genetically modified organism (GMO) that is to be defined as a living modified organism (LMO) according to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, but perhaps also one that may be generally recognized as safe (GRAS) organism.
There are various flavours of Cisgenics® in the literature and this table describes the vast majority of them.
Here I have adapted a slide from Crop&Food that describes the progression of crop development to describe where cisgenics® lie.
The foundation for our cisgenics® approach is built upon two genomics technologies, namely GeneThresher®, i.e. methyl filtered genomic sequence database and SAGE™, i.e. serial analysis of gene expression.
The ryegrass genome is organised methylated so called junk DNA ( * red) non-methylated functional gene space shown in blue and green. dark green * shows the organelle genome content blue * the nuclear non-methylated genespace. Traditionally, EST technology has been used to access the functional genes and relies heavily according to their expression. GeneThresher® uses the methylation status of the functional gene sequences to isolate it in an unbiased manner.
As I had mentioned earlier, EST is the most widely used technology to isolate functional gene sequences. Despite a massive build-up of EST database over the past 15 years, in Arabidopsis and rice ~15% and ~10% of the genes have not been captured by this technology. In black cottonwood ( Populus trichocarpa ), whose genome was published last year, the draft analysis indicates 45 555 protein coding gene loci, of which only 54% were covered by the EST database comprising of 102 019 entries. Similarly, a preliminary g enome analysis in barel medic ( Medicago trunculata ) indicates the presence of 42 358 gene coding loci, but NCBI EST database of 236 819 entries indicate 38% contributing to the unigene database. However, in many organisms the EST database tends to be small and hence approximately 50% of the genes are not discoverable by standard EST projects.
A comparison between GeneThresher® and EST in gene space capture as demonstrated by the Sorghum project.
We invested in GeneThresher® in partnership with Orion genomics based in the US Looking closer at the ryegrass genome we see that there are islands of un-methylated genes (shown in blue) amongst methylated junk DNA shown in red. GeneThresher® based on the fragmentation of the genome and the selection of un-methylated DNA only for sequencing. Multiple hits per gene Random gene tagging equal chance of low expressed genes being identified as high Contig sequences put together
Here is a snapshot of what we have got in our genomic database.
This valuable resource was placed in Gramene! Database more than three years ago for the benefit of monocot researchers worldwide.
For marker assisted breeding we have characterised over 2,000 microsatellite markers and many thousands of SNP’s.
The foundation for our cisgenics® approach is built upon two genomics technologies, namely GeneThresher®, i.e. methyl filtered genomic sequence database and SAGE™, i.e. serial analysis of gene expression.
Here is what we got in our expression database.
P-DNA is the ryegrass ortholog of Agrobacterium T-DNA. The terminology is based on Simplot Plant Sciences publication in Plant Physiology. Rommens et al. 2004 Plant Physiol 135(1): 421-431
Why drought? Even in New Zealand, climate change is going to make water a scarce and erratic commodity.
A preliminary screen of VP events screened for drought tolerance in order to select the best 20% of the events. Many plants were examined for the engineered VP expression at the transcript level and a few at the protein level.