SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 41
Perennial Ryegrass ( Lolium perenne  L.) Improvement Through Cisgenics® Sathish Puthigae
Dedicated to the memory of  Oluf   L .  Gamborg   (1924–2007)  SIVB 2005 Lifetime  Distinguished  Achievement Award Winner
Pastoral Genomics is funded by Meat and Wool NZ, Fonterra, AgResearch, Deer Industry NZ, FRST and Dairy InSight Mission
Our Meat, Dairy, Wool and Deer industries rely on productive pasture for their international low-cost and high-quality positions. Biotechnology will give the greatest stepwise and sustainable improvement in pasture productivity. We will use our in-depth knowledge of pasture genomes to enhance conventional breeding. Pastoral Genomics will use ryegrass genes in ryegrass, clover genes in clover to capture the untapped genetic potential in pasture plants. Introduction
Data from DEXCEL 2002 Condensed tannins Availability of Ryegrass in New Zealand Winter   Spring     Summer   Autumn Feed demand and supply 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 June September December March Pasture growth, herd demand (kg DM/ha/day) Drought/Temp tolerance Flowering Pasture Growth Herd Demand
Cisgenics ® Transgenics
Cisgenics ®  – what? Definitions and considerations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Cisgenics® - why? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Would a cisgenic® product be… ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],An NZ First! Cisgenic® NO ADDITIVES, GUARANTEED 101% Ryegrass Tear here
Cisgenics® in the science literature: One idea, many expressions Combination of Intra- and Cisgenics® TBA Precision Breeding (Rommens et al.) Intermediate between Schouten and Conner. Achievable in part today; more later. Functional units of endogenous genome (promoters, CDS, etc. in new combinations – we would reserve the right to omit introns) Cisgenics® (Hanley et al.) Like WideHyb approach; difficult to detect (create call for sequence-specific tags to identify GMO?) Cassette-sized fragments of sexually-compatible genome e.g. whole gene with own regulatory elements, introns etc. “ Cisgenics” (Schouten et al.) Likely to be able to do almost anything transgenics can do Recognizable (via BLAST) fragments of endogenous genome in any order Intragenics (Conner et al.) Unique aspects Recombinable unit Flavour
Continuum in GM approaches Traditional crop breeding Wide hybrids and induced mutations   GM crops with no foreign DNA GM crops with foreign vectors GM crops with transgenes GM crops with synthetic genes
Biotech assisted GM ryegrass cultivars Cisgenics® GeneThresher®  SAGE TM
The ryegrass genome 84% Methylated repeats Nuclear genespace Organelle genomes
EST’s, 15 years on, how do they do? dbEST release 062207; Summary by Organism – 22 June 2007; Uni Gene count  19 July 2007 1 276 692 EST entries   1 211 418 EST entries   Arabidopsis thaliana  Oryza sativa Number of UniGene entries
From: Sorghum Genome Sequencing by Methylation Filtration Bedell JA, et al. PLoS Biology Vol. 3, No. 1, e13 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030013  EST’s vs GeneThresher® % Genes Tagged 0  100  200  300  400  500  600  700  800  900 Reads (x1000) Methyl filtration EST 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
The ryegrass genome is comprised of islands of genes nestled among oceans of repetitive junk DNA*.   Genomic subclones are generated by fragmenting DNA from ryegrass. Methyl filtration leaves behind only the ‘genespace’ *Rabinowicz  et al . ‘ Differential methylation of genes and retrotransposons facilitates shotgun sequencing of the maize genome’ in  Nature Genetics  1999 23(11): 305-9 Project completed GeneThresher™ Methyl filtration leaves behind only the ‘genespace’
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Ryegrass Genome Database
Syntenial tracking against rice genome
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],>8,500 microsatellite markers (linked to non-methylated DNA) >1,000’s Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms GeneThresher™ helped us mine some…
Biotech assisted GM ryegrass cultivars Cisgenics® GeneThresher®  SAGE TM
Transcriptomics: SAGE ™  SCIENCE AAAAAAAAA CATG AAAAAAAAA CATG AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG Isolate mRNA/total RNA from tissue of choice cDNA primed with oligo(dT) magnetic beads AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAA CATG TTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAA CATG TTT TTTTTT MAGNET
Transcriptomics: SAGE ™  SCIENCE Digest cDNA with a 4 base cutter (anchoring enzyme) MAGNET GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA GTAC AAAAAAAAA TTT TTTTTT GTAC AAAAAAAAA TTT TTTTTT Divide in half; ligate to linkers A and B MAGNET MAGNET GTAC AAAAAAAAA TTT TTTTTT CATG GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG GTAC AAAAAAAAA TTT TTTTTT CATG
Transcriptomics: SAGE ™  SCIENCE Cleave with tagging enzyme; Blunt end GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ Ligate GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□
Transcriptomics: SAGE ™  SCIENCE GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ PCR Amplify CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC   ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC  □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG  □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC   □□□□□ □□□□□ Cleave with Anchoring Enzyme
Clone concatanated ditags and sequence Transcriptomics: SAGE ™  SCIENCE Concatanate ditags
SAGE ™ :  S erial  A nalysis of  G ene  E xpression 11 1 3 3 1 1 Compare with  other libraries In planta   functional genomics Genes Promoters Rice/Ryegrass
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Advantages of  SAGE ™
Ryegrass  SAGE ™  Library: Snapshot
Application of  SAGE ™  in ryegrass functional genomics SAGE ™ Genes ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],GeneThresher ®
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation technique developed using the variety Tolosa is  now extended to varieties Impact (diploid) and Banquet   (tetraploid) Biotech assisted GM ryegrass varieties Adapted from: Bajaj et al. A high throughput  Agrobacterium tumefaciens -mediated transformation method for functional genomics of perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne  L.).  Plant Cell Reports  2006 25(7): 651-659
…  now to assemble a Cisgenic® ryegrass
Validation of elements required for Cisgenics® Transfer border sequences P-DNA - 2 different right border sequences identified - 1 left border sequence identified Borders tested using 2xCaMV35S::Hpt::35S 3’UTR as sample construct T-DNA Plants growing on Hygromycin selection medium T-DNA (control)  P-DNA (ORF128)
Perennial ryegrass promoters - inducible (drought) - constitutive Validation of elements required for Cisgenics®
Drought tolerant Cisgenic® perennial ryegrass cultivars Genes for targeted traits Predicted temperature and precipitation for New Zealand in 75 years (data from NIWA)
[object Object],[object Object],Licensed gene From: Gaxiola et al. Drought- and salt-tolerant plants result from overexpression of the AVP1 H+-pump  Proc Natl Acad Sci,  USA (2001) 98(20): 11444-11449 ,[object Object],[object Object]
Drought tolerance - Vacuolar Pyrophosphatase a b c g d e f h
Drought tolerant Cisgenic® perennial ryegrass cultivars ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Vacuolar Pyrophosphatase - refinements
Drought tolerant Cisgenic® perennial ryegrass cultivars Genes developed with PG IP – ORF4 & ORF12 Drought tolerance – Transcription factors
Increased biomass Cisgenic ®  perennial ryegrass cultivars ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Gene discovered in our functional genomics programme in rice RICE Wild type ORF54 T1 plants 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1000109 112360210 112950316 112950317 112950318 112950320 Shoot Dry Matter (g)
Elements to be validated ,[object Object],[object Object],Target to produce Cisgenic® compliant perennial ryegrass  thereafter
Zac Hanley Shivendra Bajaj Catherine Bryant  Kerry Templeton Geoff Gill Margaret Biswas Kieran Elborough   David Whittaker   Jonathan Phillips   Claudia Smith-Espinoza  Nimali Withana  Catherine Carter Anke Rintelmann Robert Winz   Muhannad Al-Wahb Paul Bickerstaff Plus Researchers at: Orion Genomics,  Dexcel,  HortResearch,  AgResearch,  MetaHelix, University of Florida,  Cold Spring Harbor Lab,  University of Manchester,  Crop&Food, Phytowelt, Eurogene, Scion (ForestResearch),  University of Chile Acknowledgement

More Related Content

Similar to Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Improvement Through Cisgenics®

geneticengineering.ppt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
geneticengineering.ppt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmgeneticengineering.ppt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
geneticengineering.ppt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmCusiLacudiLabra
 
geneticengineering.ppt
geneticengineering.pptgeneticengineering.ppt
geneticengineering.pptHussainTaqi1
 
Biotech Era Ahead: Transcriptomics
Biotech Era Ahead: TranscriptomicsBiotech Era Ahead: Transcriptomics
Biotech Era Ahead: TranscriptomicsTaha A. Taha
 
Interesting Tuur
Interesting TuurInteresting Tuur
Interesting Tuurmeneertuur
 
Gene mutations
Gene mutationsGene mutations
Gene mutationspawl9
 
Gene Mutations
Gene MutationsGene Mutations
Gene MutationsAhmad Raza
 
GENE MUTATIONS.ppt
GENE MUTATIONS.pptGENE MUTATIONS.ppt
GENE MUTATIONS.pptthibhan
 
Glycos Biotechnologies.TAMU presentation_PC edits
Glycos Biotechnologies.TAMU presentation_PC editsGlycos Biotechnologies.TAMU presentation_PC edits
Glycos Biotechnologies.TAMU presentation_PC editsAllana Robertson
 
Sequenciamento de DNA
Sequenciamento de DNASequenciamento de DNA
Sequenciamento de DNAfelipes
 
Site directed mutagenesis of β2-microglobulin PowerPoint Presentation
Site directed mutagenesis of β2-microglobulin PowerPoint PresentationSite directed mutagenesis of β2-microglobulin PowerPoint Presentation
Site directed mutagenesis of β2-microglobulin PowerPoint PresentationTyler Liang
 
Fast qPCR assay optimization and validation techniques for HTS
Fast qPCR assay optimization and validation techniques for HTSFast qPCR assay optimization and validation techniques for HTS
Fast qPCR assay optimization and validation techniques for HTSAmerican Biotechnologist
 
Jordt_Transcription_flipbook
Jordt_Transcription_flipbookJordt_Transcription_flipbook
Jordt_Transcription_flipbookpunxsyscience
 
CRISPR Is On The Move: Genome Editing From Rice To Wheat
CRISPR Is On The Move: Genome Editing From Rice To WheatCRISPR Is On The Move: Genome Editing From Rice To Wheat
CRISPR Is On The Move: Genome Editing From Rice To WheatFabio Caligaris
 
Antibiotic Resistance
Antibiotic ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance
Antibiotic ResistanceRaj Tilak
 

Similar to Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Improvement Through Cisgenics® (20)

geneticengineering.ppt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
geneticengineering.ppt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmgeneticengineering.ppt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
geneticengineering.ppt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
 
geneticengineering.ppt
geneticengineering.pptgeneticengineering.ppt
geneticengineering.ppt
 
Biotech Era Ahead: Transcriptomics
Biotech Era Ahead: TranscriptomicsBiotech Era Ahead: Transcriptomics
Biotech Era Ahead: Transcriptomics
 
In silico analysis for unknown data
In silico analysis for unknown dataIn silico analysis for unknown data
In silico analysis for unknown data
 
Interesting Tuur
Interesting TuurInteresting Tuur
Interesting Tuur
 
Gene mutations
Gene mutationsGene mutations
Gene mutations
 
Gene Mutations
Gene MutationsGene Mutations
Gene Mutations
 
Poster Pubblicazione
Poster PubblicazionePoster Pubblicazione
Poster Pubblicazione
 
GENE MUTATIONS.ppt
GENE MUTATIONS.pptGENE MUTATIONS.ppt
GENE MUTATIONS.ppt
 
Glycos Biotechnologies.TAMU presentation_PC edits
Glycos Biotechnologies.TAMU presentation_PC editsGlycos Biotechnologies.TAMU presentation_PC edits
Glycos Biotechnologies.TAMU presentation_PC edits
 
Sequenciamento de DNA
Sequenciamento de DNASequenciamento de DNA
Sequenciamento de DNA
 
Site directed mutagenesis of β2-microglobulin PowerPoint Presentation
Site directed mutagenesis of β2-microglobulin PowerPoint PresentationSite directed mutagenesis of β2-microglobulin PowerPoint Presentation
Site directed mutagenesis of β2-microglobulin PowerPoint Presentation
 
Fast qPCR assay optimization and validation techniques for HTS
Fast qPCR assay optimization and validation techniques for HTSFast qPCR assay optimization and validation techniques for HTS
Fast qPCR assay optimization and validation techniques for HTS
 
CRISPR mediated haploid inducer stock development in rice
CRISPR mediated haploid inducer stock development in riceCRISPR mediated haploid inducer stock development in rice
CRISPR mediated haploid inducer stock development in rice
 
Bioinformatics grain genes
Bioinformatics grain genesBioinformatics grain genes
Bioinformatics grain genes
 
Jordt_Transcription_flipbook
Jordt_Transcription_flipbookJordt_Transcription_flipbook
Jordt_Transcription_flipbook
 
CRISPR Is On The Move: Genome Editing From Rice To Wheat
CRISPR Is On The Move: Genome Editing From Rice To WheatCRISPR Is On The Move: Genome Editing From Rice To Wheat
CRISPR Is On The Move: Genome Editing From Rice To Wheat
 
Antibiotic Resistance
Antibiotic ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance
Antibiotic Resistance
 
cloning
cloningcloning
cloning
 
Cloning
CloningCloning
Cloning
 

Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Improvement Through Cisgenics®

  • 1. Perennial Ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.) Improvement Through Cisgenics® Sathish Puthigae
  • 2. Dedicated to the memory of Oluf L . Gamborg (1924–2007) SIVB 2005 Lifetime Distinguished Achievement Award Winner
  • 3. Pastoral Genomics is funded by Meat and Wool NZ, Fonterra, AgResearch, Deer Industry NZ, FRST and Dairy InSight Mission
  • 4. Our Meat, Dairy, Wool and Deer industries rely on productive pasture for their international low-cost and high-quality positions. Biotechnology will give the greatest stepwise and sustainable improvement in pasture productivity. We will use our in-depth knowledge of pasture genomes to enhance conventional breeding. Pastoral Genomics will use ryegrass genes in ryegrass, clover genes in clover to capture the untapped genetic potential in pasture plants. Introduction
  • 5. Data from DEXCEL 2002 Condensed tannins Availability of Ryegrass in New Zealand Winter Spring Summer Autumn Feed demand and supply 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 June September December March Pasture growth, herd demand (kg DM/ha/day) Drought/Temp tolerance Flowering Pasture Growth Herd Demand
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10. Cisgenics® in the science literature: One idea, many expressions Combination of Intra- and Cisgenics® TBA Precision Breeding (Rommens et al.) Intermediate between Schouten and Conner. Achievable in part today; more later. Functional units of endogenous genome (promoters, CDS, etc. in new combinations – we would reserve the right to omit introns) Cisgenics® (Hanley et al.) Like WideHyb approach; difficult to detect (create call for sequence-specific tags to identify GMO?) Cassette-sized fragments of sexually-compatible genome e.g. whole gene with own regulatory elements, introns etc. “ Cisgenics” (Schouten et al.) Likely to be able to do almost anything transgenics can do Recognizable (via BLAST) fragments of endogenous genome in any order Intragenics (Conner et al.) Unique aspects Recombinable unit Flavour
  • 11. Continuum in GM approaches Traditional crop breeding Wide hybrids and induced mutations GM crops with no foreign DNA GM crops with foreign vectors GM crops with transgenes GM crops with synthetic genes
  • 12. Biotech assisted GM ryegrass cultivars Cisgenics® GeneThresher® SAGE TM
  • 13. The ryegrass genome 84% Methylated repeats Nuclear genespace Organelle genomes
  • 14. EST’s, 15 years on, how do they do? dbEST release 062207; Summary by Organism – 22 June 2007; Uni Gene count 19 July 2007 1 276 692 EST entries 1 211 418 EST entries Arabidopsis thaliana Oryza sativa Number of UniGene entries
  • 15. From: Sorghum Genome Sequencing by Methylation Filtration Bedell JA, et al. PLoS Biology Vol. 3, No. 1, e13 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030013 EST’s vs GeneThresher® % Genes Tagged 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Reads (x1000) Methyl filtration EST 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
  • 16. The ryegrass genome is comprised of islands of genes nestled among oceans of repetitive junk DNA*. Genomic subclones are generated by fragmenting DNA from ryegrass. Methyl filtration leaves behind only the ‘genespace’ *Rabinowicz et al . ‘ Differential methylation of genes and retrotransposons facilitates shotgun sequencing of the maize genome’ in Nature Genetics 1999 23(11): 305-9 Project completed GeneThresher™ Methyl filtration leaves behind only the ‘genespace’
  • 17.
  • 19.
  • 20. Biotech assisted GM ryegrass cultivars Cisgenics® GeneThresher® SAGE TM
  • 21. Transcriptomics: SAGE ™ SCIENCE AAAAAAAAA CATG AAAAAAAAA CATG AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG Isolate mRNA/total RNA from tissue of choice cDNA primed with oligo(dT) magnetic beads AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAA CATG TTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAA CATG TTT TTTTTT MAGNET
  • 22. Transcriptomics: SAGE ™ SCIENCE Digest cDNA with a 4 base cutter (anchoring enzyme) MAGNET GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA GTAC AAAAAAAAA TTT TTTTTT GTAC AAAAAAAAA TTT TTTTTT Divide in half; ligate to linkers A and B MAGNET MAGNET GTAC AAAAAAAAA TTT TTTTTT CATG GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG GTAC TTTTTTTTT TTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA CATG GTAC AAAAAAAAA TTT TTTTTT CATG
  • 23. Transcriptomics: SAGE ™ SCIENCE Cleave with tagging enzyme; Blunt end GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ Ligate GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□
  • 24. Transcriptomics: SAGE ™ SCIENCE GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CCTAC GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ GGATGCATG □□□□□ □□□□□ CCTAC GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ PCR Amplify CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ GTAC ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ CATG □□□□□ □□□□□ GTAC □□□□□ □□□□□ Cleave with Anchoring Enzyme
  • 25. Clone concatanated ditags and sequence Transcriptomics: SAGE ™ SCIENCE Concatanate ditags
  • 26. SAGE ™ : S erial A nalysis of G ene E xpression 11 1 3 3 1 1 Compare with other libraries In planta functional genomics Genes Promoters Rice/Ryegrass
  • 27.
  • 28. Ryegrass SAGE ™ Library: Snapshot
  • 29.
  • 30. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation technique developed using the variety Tolosa is now extended to varieties Impact (diploid) and Banquet (tetraploid) Biotech assisted GM ryegrass varieties Adapted from: Bajaj et al. A high throughput Agrobacterium tumefaciens -mediated transformation method for functional genomics of perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.). Plant Cell Reports 2006 25(7): 651-659
  • 31. … now to assemble a Cisgenic® ryegrass
  • 32. Validation of elements required for Cisgenics® Transfer border sequences P-DNA - 2 different right border sequences identified - 1 left border sequence identified Borders tested using 2xCaMV35S::Hpt::35S 3’UTR as sample construct T-DNA Plants growing on Hygromycin selection medium T-DNA (control) P-DNA (ORF128)
  • 33. Perennial ryegrass promoters - inducible (drought) - constitutive Validation of elements required for Cisgenics®
  • 34. Drought tolerant Cisgenic® perennial ryegrass cultivars Genes for targeted traits Predicted temperature and precipitation for New Zealand in 75 years (data from NIWA)
  • 35.
  • 36. Drought tolerance - Vacuolar Pyrophosphatase a b c g d e f h
  • 37.
  • 38. Drought tolerant Cisgenic® perennial ryegrass cultivars Genes developed with PG IP – ORF4 & ORF12 Drought tolerance – Transcription factors
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41. Zac Hanley Shivendra Bajaj Catherine Bryant Kerry Templeton Geoff Gill Margaret Biswas Kieran Elborough David Whittaker Jonathan Phillips Claudia Smith-Espinoza Nimali Withana Catherine Carter Anke Rintelmann Robert Winz Muhannad Al-Wahb Paul Bickerstaff Plus Researchers at: Orion Genomics, Dexcel, HortResearch, AgResearch, MetaHelix, University of Florida, Cold Spring Harbor Lab, University of Manchester, Crop&Food, Phytowelt, Eurogene, Scion (ForestResearch), University of Chile Acknowledgement

Editor's Notes

  1. I wish to thank the organizers for giving me the opportunity to present before you our research accomplishments in perennial ryegrass to date. Before I do just that I would like to tell you who we are. Pastoral Genomics is the sole investment by the New Zealand pastoral industries into forage improvement through biotechnology. We are funded by Meat and Wool NZ, Fonterra, AgResearch, Deer Industry NZ, FRST and Dairy InSight. Our research focus is in the area of Cisgenics® and MAS in clover and ryegrass.
  2. Our Meat, Dairy, Wool and Deer industries rely on productive pasture for their international low-cost and high quality positions. Biotechnology will give the greatest stepwise and sustainable improvement in pasture productivity. We will use our in-depth knowledge of pasture genomes to enhance conventional breeding. Pastoral Genomics will use ryegrass genes in ryegrass, clover genes in clover to capture the untapped genetic potential in pasture plants.
  3. This slide shows the supply and demand for perennial ryegrass in New Zealand pastures. As anywhere else in the world, growth in spring and summer is almost twice during autumn and winter, a period when New Zealand cows are gestating and calving. The decrease in biomass can be attributed to the effects of drought and low temperature as well as the re-routing of energy by the plant from biomass to the production of floral tillers and seeds. Also, throughout the year there is a underlying need for increased condensed tannins to ensure animal health. Given this background it is easy for anyone to predict what our area of research priorities are.
  4. Earlier on, I had mentioned that Pastoral Genomics has adopted Cisgenics® over transgenics as the preferred tool for plant improvement. I will now dwell a bit more and explain what is Cisgenics®
  5. A cisgenic® organism is a transgenic organism with a subtle but critical difference. A cisgenic® organism is a transgenic organism where elements of the organism’s own genome are used in place of elements from other genomes. So, no elephant genes in daisies or toad genes in potatoes. There are many things that cannot be done via this approach, and transgenic option will be required now and perhaps always.
  6. Why is that we are subscribing to cisgenics®? It is because of the common perceptions of GM crops held world-wide and also because of New Zealand-specific geo-political realities. We believe cisgenics® could be favourably assessed over transgenics under these constraints.
  7. A cisgenic® product is a genetically modified organism (GMO) that is to be defined as a living modified organism (LMO) according to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, but perhaps also one that may be generally recognized as safe (GRAS) organism.
  8. There are various flavours of Cisgenics® in the literature and this table describes the vast majority of them.
  9. Here I have adapted a slide from Crop&Food that describes the progression of crop development to describe where cisgenics® lie.
  10. The foundation for our cisgenics® approach is built upon two genomics technologies, namely GeneThresher®, i.e. methyl filtered genomic sequence database and SAGE™, i.e. serial analysis of gene expression.
  11. The ryegrass genome is organised methylated so called junk DNA ( * red) non-methylated functional gene space shown in blue and green. dark green * shows the organelle genome content blue * the nuclear non-methylated genespace. Traditionally, EST technology has been used to access the functional genes and relies heavily according to their expression. GeneThresher® uses the methylation status of the functional gene sequences to isolate it in an unbiased manner.
  12. As I had mentioned earlier, EST is the most widely used technology to isolate functional gene sequences. Despite a massive build-up of EST database over the past 15 years, in Arabidopsis and rice ~15% and ~10% of the genes have not been captured by this technology. In black cottonwood ( Populus trichocarpa ), whose genome was published last year, the draft analysis indicates 45 555 protein coding gene loci, of which only 54% were covered by the EST database comprising of 102 019 entries. Similarly, a preliminary g enome analysis in barel medic ( Medicago trunculata ) indicates the presence of 42 358 gene coding loci, but NCBI EST database of 236 819 entries indicate 38% contributing to the unigene database. However, in many organisms the EST database tends to be small and hence approximately 50% of the genes are not discoverable by standard EST projects.
  13. A comparison between GeneThresher® and EST in gene space capture as demonstrated by the Sorghum project.
  14. We invested in GeneThresher® in partnership with Orion genomics based in the US Looking closer at the ryegrass genome we see that there are islands of un-methylated genes (shown in blue) amongst methylated junk DNA shown in red. GeneThresher® based on the fragmentation of the genome and the selection of un-methylated DNA only for sequencing. Multiple hits per gene Random gene tagging equal chance of low expressed genes being identified as high Contig sequences put together
  15. Here is a snapshot of what we have got in our genomic database.
  16. This valuable resource was placed in Gramene! Database more than three years ago for the benefit of monocot researchers worldwide.
  17. For marker assisted breeding we have characterised over 2,000 microsatellite markers and many thousands of SNP’s.
  18. The foundation for our cisgenics® approach is built upon two genomics technologies, namely GeneThresher®, i.e. methyl filtered genomic sequence database and SAGE™, i.e. serial analysis of gene expression.
  19. Here is what we got in our expression database.
  20. P-DNA is the ryegrass ortholog of Agrobacterium T-DNA. The terminology is based on Simplot Plant Sciences publication in Plant Physiology. Rommens et al. 2004 Plant Physiol 135(1): 421-431
  21. Why drought? Even in New Zealand, climate change is going to make water a scarce and erratic commodity.
  22. A preliminary screen of VP events screened for drought tolerance in order to select the best 20% of the events. Many plants were examined for the engineered VP expression at the transcript level and a few at the protein level.