“My Sister’s Keeper”
by: Jodi Picoult
Ethics: Week 5 Presentation
November 2010
Jaelin Mayer
Stephanie Noble
Stephen Lee
Story Outline
Kate is a 16 year old who was diagnosed with Leukemia at 2
years old. She has an older brother, but he is not a genetic
ma...
Now that Kate is 16, she is progressively getting weaker
and treatments are no longer effective. Kate does not want
to be ...
Presenters
 Jaelin Mayer – Role of Anna
 Stephanie Noble – Role of Kate
 Stephen Lee – Role of Parents
Step 1: Ethical
Questions
 Should a doctor recommend a family have another child in
order to have a bone marrow match for...
Step 2:
Our First
Reactions
STEP 3: What
are the
clinically
relevant
facts?
 Both Anna and Kate are minors.
 Kate has a cancer that will kill her wi...
What facts do you
need to gather?
 What policies are already in place?
 What does the law say about a minor donating a k...
Step 4: What are the values at stake for
all the relevant parties?
 Kate
Autonomy
Respect for Persons
Time with family...
 Anna
Autonomy
Quality of Life
Responsibility
Respect for Persons
Family relationships
Parents
Family
Health
Fidelity
 Medical Community
Providing Treatment Options
Acting in the Patient’s Best Interest
Education
Empathy & Compassion
...
Step 5:
What could you
do?
 As Kate,
 I could tell my family and doctors my wishes not to
receive more medical treatment...
 As Anna,
 I could donate my kidney, even though it will alter my
future plans, there is a risk that I could die, and it...
 As the parents,
 We could talk with Kate
about how she is doing with
all the medical treatments,
discuss what she wants...
 As the Medical Community,
 We could educate the family.
 We could talk with Kate and Anna individually.
 We could sol...
Step 6:
What should you do?
 Educate
 Long-term Consequences
 Odds of Recovery
 American Academy of Pediatrics
Guideli...
Step 7:
Justify your choice
 Education
 Patient’s Best interest
 Integrity
Step 8:
How could this ethical
issue have been
prevented
 Education regarding the existing American Academy of
Pediatrics...
Resources:
 http://www.suite101.com/content/book-review-my-sisters-keeper-
a38500 (for summary of the book/movie)
 “Mino...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

My sister’s keeper - final

8,100

Published on

Team posterior - Final Ethics Presentation
Fall 2010
Jaelin Mayer
Stephanie Noble
Stephen Lee

Please click from slide to slide. All audio files will start automatically.

Published in: Health & Medicine, Education
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
8,100
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
75
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • We feel there is a lot of information we need to gather in order to make a decision on this case.
    First – we would like to know what policies have already been established that address this case, including the legality of a minor donating a kidney.
    Second – we would like to know what the health risks are for Anna – for both donating bone marrow and donating a kidney.
    Third – we feel it is important to know what the health status is for Kate. What are her chances of survival, with and without receiving a kidney.
    Finally – We want to know what has been communicated to Kate’s parents. Are they aware of the ramifications for both Kate and Anna in a kidney transplant? Have they received any medical or community support in making their decisions regarding Kate’s treatment?
  • As the Medical Community,
    We could educate the family on the pros and cons of the procedure for both daughters, and the long term expectations regarding outcomes for the treatment of Kate- with and without the transplant.
    We could talk with Kate about her wishes and facilitate conversations between her and her family members.
    We could talk with Anna about the procedure, her concerns, and how it will affect her life in the future, and ensure that her organ donation is voluntary and not coerced.
    We could make sure that all the criteria for a minor donating an organ are met, including all the required assessments and evaluations prior to performing the surgery.
    We could refuse to perform a transplant on a minor.
    We could do the transplant based on the parents’ wishes.

  • As the medical team, we should educate the family about the possible outcomes of surgery for both Anna and Kate.
    Every procedure is risky and either child could have a negative outcome. The parents (and Anna) need to understand the consequences of donating a kidney for the long-term.
    Also, there needs to be an understanding of what the odds are for Kate to recover from her cancer. She is very sick and treatment may not be successful.
    According to the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, We would also call in the Donor Advocacy Team to talk with both Anna and Kate about this donation and their wishes. We would also ensure that Anna (as a minor) consents to the organ donation without coercion.
  • Education is key for all the family members. We think every family member needs to be in agreement that this surgery is right for both of the daughters- especially Anna. If Anna donates one of her kidneys, it could have long term implications for her own health, and there is no guarantee that this transplant will save her sister.

    There are many conflicting values in this case. As medical providers, we must be certain that both patients- Kate and Anna- are receiving proper medical care that is appropriate for their conditions- and that they consent to the procedures. Kate is very sick and the odds of full recovery are very slim. A kidney transplant may buy her some time, but it is not a cure for her cancer. Anna could end up with severe medical consequences if she donates a kidney and she needs to be able to choose whether she is willing to make these sacrifices.

    Having a child that is genetically engineered to “treat” a sibling is not expressing a value for that child’s life. They are still a person with needs and feelings. Just because you have the bone marrow match does not indicate that you “have to” give it. When Anna was younger and all that was being asked of her was blood and marrow, there was less to be concerned about. Giving blood and marrow is very safe. On the other hand, donating an organ is risky for both people. Asking a healthy child to take that kind of risk for a sibling should be done very carefully. That child will have to live with the consequences of that donation for the rest of their life. This affects them much more than their “adolescent” years so we feel they should have input into whether they donate or not. They should not be pressured. Adults should help them make and respect that decision.
  • There should be a hospital policy on sibling/underage organ/tissue donation. This could protect both family members from false expectations or from family tensions caused by “uncooperative” family members.
    Education of such policy
    Counseling for the family to ensure that no undue pressure is placed on Anna to donate if she does not want to.
  • My sister’s keeper - final

    1. 1. “My Sister’s Keeper” by: Jodi Picoult Ethics: Week 5 Presentation November 2010 Jaelin Mayer Stephanie Noble Stephen Lee
    2. 2. Story Outline
    3. 3. Kate is a 16 year old who was diagnosed with Leukemia at 2 years old. She has an older brother, but he is not a genetic match for a bone marrow transplant. Doctors recommended that her parents scientifically engineer another child to ensure a bone marrow match for Kate. Kate’s parents eagerly pursued having another child in order to try and save Kate’s life. Anna is born and from birth is subjected to multiple procedures in order to treat Kate. From donating bone marrow to blood, Anna spent a lot of her childhood in the hospital as well.
    4. 4. Now that Kate is 16, she is progressively getting weaker and treatments are no longer effective. Kate does not want to be treated anymore. She is ready to let go but doesn’t know how to tell her family. Doctors say a kidney is Kate’s only chance for survival. Her parents are pushing Anna to donate, even though there are definite long-term consequences for Anna if she only has one kidney. Unable to convince her parents that she does not want to donate her kidney to her sister, she hires a lawyer to sue for medical emancipation.
    5. 5. Presenters  Jaelin Mayer – Role of Anna  Stephanie Noble – Role of Kate  Stephen Lee – Role of Parents
    6. 6. Step 1: Ethical Questions  Should a doctor recommend a family have another child in order to have a bone marrow match for a living child?  Should a family scientifically engineer a child for the sole purpose of harvesting tissues and organs for another child?  Do Anna's parents have the right to require Anna to donate an organ to her sister?  Is Anna, 13 years old, subject to her own assent, or is she legally bound to her parents will because of her age? Should she have any say in her participation in donating tissue/organs?  As Kate is dying, does she have the right to request the cessation of treatments when recovery seems very remote?
    7. 7. Step 2: Our First Reactions
    8. 8. STEP 3: What are the clinically relevant facts?  Both Anna and Kate are minors.  Kate has a cancer that will kill her without treatment and Anna is the only organ/tissue match for this treatment.  By continually donating, Anna’s quality of life has been greatly impacted.  The parents want to continue fighting the cancer – at all costs.
    9. 9. What facts do you need to gather?  What policies are already in place?  What does the law say about a minor donating a kidney?  What are the health risks for Anna in continually giving bone marrow and tissues?  What are the health risks for Anna to donate a kidney?  What are the chances for Kate’s survival and cancer remission if she continues to receive bone marrow and a kidney transplant?  What has been communicated to the parents regarding Kate’s chances for survival?  Is the family in any kind of support group that could help them process through these decisions?
    10. 10. Step 4: What are the values at stake for all the relevant parties?  Kate Autonomy Respect for Persons Time with family Dying with Dignity
    11. 11.  Anna Autonomy Quality of Life Responsibility Respect for Persons Family relationships
    12. 12. Parents Family Health Fidelity
    13. 13.  Medical Community Providing Treatment Options Acting in the Patient’s Best Interest Education Empathy & Compassion Respecting decisions of patient/family
    14. 14. Step 5: What could you do?  As Kate,  I could tell my family and doctors my wishes not to receive more medical treatment.  I could let Anna give me her kidney and be thankful for the small amount of time it would buy me with my family.  I could sue for medical emancipation for myself so I could choose when to stop treatment.  I could refuse the treatment and hope people would support my decision.
    15. 15.  As Anna,  I could donate my kidney, even though it will alter my future plans, there is a risk that I could die, and it may not ultimately save my sister’s life.  I could sue my parents for medical emancipation so that I can make the decision about my kidney and any future procedures for myself, although this will anger my parents and my sister may die as a result.
    16. 16.  As the parents,  We could talk with Kate about how she is doing with all the medical treatments, discuss what she wants to do, and try to come to a decision on the future steps of her care based on the conversation.  We could let Kate die with dignity.  We could wait for another treatment option.  We could force Anna to donate her kidney.
    17. 17.  As the Medical Community,  We could educate the family.  We could talk with Kate and Anna individually.  We could solely follow the AAP criteria for a minor donating an organ.  We could refuse to perform a transplant on a minor.  We could do the transplant based on the parents’ wishes.
    18. 18. Step 6: What should you do?  Educate  Long-term Consequences  Odds of Recovery  American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines Donor Advocacy Team Minor Consent
    19. 19. Step 7: Justify your choice  Education  Patient’s Best interest  Integrity
    20. 20. Step 8: How could this ethical issue have been prevented  Education regarding the existing American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines.  Establish a policy regarding scientifically engineering a child for a bone marrow match.
    21. 21. Resources:  http://www.suite101.com/content/book-review-my-sisters-keeper- a38500 (for summary of the book/movie)  “Minors as Living Solid-Organ Donors” By Lainie Friedman Ross, MD, PhD - http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/122/2/454  “Health Care Decisionmaking by Children. Is it in their best interest?”, by Lainie Friedman Ross  http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/ethics.asp  Should minors be able to serve as living organ donors – “www.vcu.edu/.../should%20%minors%20be%20living%20donors_.ppt  All pictures are taken from movie clips
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×