• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Jim Brulte powerpoint
 

Jim Brulte powerpoint

on

  • 836 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
836
Views on SlideShare
836
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Jim Brulte powerpoint Jim Brulte powerpoint Presentation Transcript

    • The History of Political Parties Why is Sacramento so polarized?
    • HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF AMERICAN POLITICS Presidential Elections and the Realignment of American Politics Americans adjust their political mood through presidential elections
    • 1932-1964 AGE OF CLASS POLITICS Both parties ideologically balanced HAVES HAVE-NOTS Eastern WASP Northern white liberals Establishment (liberal) Southerners (conservative) Midwestern Main Street Farmers (conservative)Establishment (conservative) Minorities (liberal)
    • 1964-1988THE CONSERVATIVE REALIGNMENT Liberal vs. Conservative; Class politics ebbsSouthern, white, agrarian, conservative Democrats abandon theirparty for Republicans. The monolithic Democrat South fractures.Northern, white, moderate/liberals leave the Republican Party.The “Rockefeller Wing” of the GOP atrophies.Both shifts occur at the presidential level but take anothergeneration to take effect at the local level.
    • ERA OF CONSERVATIVE IDEOLOGICAL POLITICS 100% 80% 60.6% 59.1% 60% 57.1% 58.2% Anderson 53.4% Wallace 40% Nixon Reagan Reagan Bush Nixon 20% 0% 1968 1972 1980 1984 1988Democrats: Humphrey McGovern Carter Mondale Dukakis 42.8% 37.5% 41.6% 40.8% 45.6%
    • 1980 THE TRIUMPH OF IDEOLOGICAL REALIGNMENTRonald Reagan unites the three wings of the Republican Party Foreign Policy Anti-Communists Jeanne Kirkpatrick Economic Theocratic Free Marketers Social Theocrats Jack Kemp Jesse Helms Anti-Communism
    • 1992AFTER THE FALL OF COMMUNISMThe Three wings of the Republican Party were no longerunified by Anti-Communism.The economic and religious wings were left to wonderwhat they had in common.The GOP was pulled to the right by Pat Buchanan andChristian Conservatives.Clinton runs and wins election as a “New” Democrat.
    • 1994-2000 THE BATTLE FOR THE CENTER Socially tolerant, small government voters define elections1994: Republicans won by a landslide when the issues were government run healthcare, midnight basketball and Clinton’s budget (higher taxes). Voters don’t want bigger government, especially when their pocketbooks take a hit.1996: Clinton shifts to middle by making the issues the balanced budget, Medicare, and welfare reform. Republicans shut down government and move to the right.1998: GOP failed to gain seats in an off-year election when the Democrats controlled the Presidency due to the moralizing over Monica Lewinsky.2000: Both sides target middle and attempt to push opposition to the ideological extremes. Closest election in 100 years.
    • 2000-2008THE BATTLE FOR THE CENTER CONTINUES 2004: Bush wins 255 Congressional Districts and 62 million votes were the most individual votes ever cast for anyone in history and the first president to receive a majority since George H. W. Bush in 1988. 2006: GOP loses control or the House of Representatives and the US Senate. Congressional corruption and government spending were the biggest reasons cited by voters who voted GOP in 2006 but switched to Democrat in 2008. 2008: Republicans lose 3 congressional seats in “safe” Republican seats that President Bush carried by double digits. All three Republican candidates had more than enough resources to mount successful campaigns.
    • California’s Growing Decline-To-State Voters Voter Registration Trends 1992-Present Voter Registration Trends 1992-Present 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% Democrat 30.0% Republican DTS 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2007 Year
    • When you advocate in Sacramento it might be necessary to have two different messages • One message for Republicans • A different one for Democrats
    • Groups that Republicans Groups Democrats act act favorably to: favorably to:• Business groups • Labor Unions• Taxpayer organizations • Trial Lawyers• Church leadership • Anti-Poverty Groups• Public safety leaders • Environmental Organizations• Parental rights groups • Woman’s Rights Groups• Families with children • Gay Rights Organizations• Families Values Groups • Tribal Interests• Tribal Interests • Political Contributors• Litigation Reform Groups•Political Contributors
    • Effective Lobbying Engages the Senses • Vision 75% • Hearing 13% • Touch < 5% • Taste < 5% • Smell < 5%The best advocacy is in-person with an easy to understandvisual presentation by a friend. The most effective lobbyingentails requires a follow-up.
    • Jim Brulte, PartnerCalifornia Strategies10681 Foothill Blvd.Suite 340Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730(909) 945-2250 (O)(909) 945-2966 (F)(916) 919-3097 (C)(909) 922-5039 (H)SenatorJim31@aol.com