Intimate Partner Violence (Ipv) Systems With Background
Lithium Antisocial Behavior
1. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 1
Lithium as a Neuroscience/Public Health Approach to Reducing Antisocial Behaviors
James M. DeCarli, MPH, MPA, CHES
University of Southern California
2. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 2
Abstract
Despite interventions to help eliminate maladaptive aggression and antisocial behaviors,
victimization of violence remains a public health problem in the United States. While not all
those who are genetically predisposed to antisocial behaviors become violent, those with the
MAO-A gene, when exposed to appropriate environmental stimuli, are influenced to exhibiting
antisocial behaviors. Environmental stimuli might be observed as the problem among both the
antisocial parent and the child, but this becomes a barrier and those are not likely to seek
treatment. A public health approach to reach this difficult to reach anosognosic group, confirm a
nutritional lithium supplementation as an effective mechanism to help close this gap among those with
antisocial behaviors who choose not to seek or accept treatment, because of their denial and lack
of conscious self-awareness of illness and help meet the Health People 2010 leading health
objective to reduce youth violence. Lithium is found to reverse neurochemical and
neurostructural effects of antisocial behaviors through a protective effect among
neurotransmitters.
3. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 3
Lithium as a Neuroscience/Public Health Approach to Reducing Antisocial Behaviors
Maladaptive aggression and antisocial behaviors among both children and adolescents in
the United States have remained high over the past decade. The consequences of youth violence
have resulted in public health officials to establish youth violence as one of the leading health
objectives of the Healthy People 2010 to help address this public health problem. However,
despite public health interventions to help eliminate aggression and antisocial behaviors still 20%
of the United States population becomes victims of violent and nonviolent illegal behavior each
year (U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2002). To add to the problem, many more cases go
unreported. While public health officials promote some of the best programs found to prevent
antisocial behaviors, only 12% have been shown to reduce juvenile offender’s recidivism (Lipsey
& Wilson, 1998). While programs have not shown to be effective, this review takes a
neuroscience approach to answer if lithium supplementation can become a potential public health
strategy to reduce and control violence.
Background
Antisocial behaviors & violence. Antisocial behaviors include a complicated group of behaviors
exhibited early in adolescence and continue through adulthood. While these behaviors show a
lack of consideration for others and disregard for their rights with common problematic
characteristics in emotional regulation, impulsivity, attentional deficits, and poor judgment, the
DSM-IV identifies these behaviors not only among Antisocial personality disorder, but also
among impulse control disorders and substance use disorders. Intervention research may have
4. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 4
tried to demonstrated evidence to prevent antisocial behaviors in some programs, but outcome
evaluation has demonstrated that even the best of these programs have not shown evidence to
reduce antisocial behaviors (Weissbeerg, Kumpfer, & Seligman, 2003). Authors suggest this is
due to behavioral science not fully understanding causality of antisocial behaviors. While
causality remains in remains in question, personality traits and disorders are also common among
antisocial behaviors. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Oppositional Defiance
Disorder (ODD), and Conduct Disorder (CD), and are three disorders observed in childhood that
have a predisposing link to adult antisocial behaviors, specifically Antisocial personality disorder
(Holmes, Slaughter, & Kashani, 2001). Whereas children diagnosed with ADHD are at risk for
developing ODD and CD. And presence of ODD and CD in childhood is a predictor of antisocial
behaviors later in adulthood (Kaplan, 2004). In an effort to understand causality, prevention
research has moved toward genetic interventions. Whereas studies have demonstrated 10% of
individuals perpetrate more than 50% of crimes in the general population (Wolfgang, Figlio, &
Sellin, 1972). This confirms a familial concentration of crime in the general population, in that
less than 10% of families account for more than half of that community’s criminal offenses.
Moffitt (2005) illustrates that causation however is not fully understood because while these
studies show that the family concentration of antisocial behaviors might seem to be influenced by
genetics, but could also be explained by non-genetic social transmission of antisocial behaviors
within families. However as further suggested by Moffitt, few studies have demonstrated the
causal status of most risk factors. As observed in intervention research on antisocial behavior,
this results in costly interventions that not only lead to failure but also other consequences. Tax
dollars and other resources have been wasted because intervention programs have been
implemented on the basis of risk factors without sufficient research to understand causal
5. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 5
processes (Moffitt, 2005). These include mentoring programs, family preservation programs, and
peer-group programs, more specifically programs such as Drug Abuse Resistance Education
(DARE) or boot camps, for example have not shown to reduce antisocial behaviors. For
programs to be effective in changing behaviors, while causality has not yet determined, authors
suggest better understanding genetic predisposition and the role neurotransmitters play in
antisocial behaviors.
Genes, Neurotransmitters & Violence. Genetic predisposition to violent behaviors is becoming
more prevalent in the prevention literature. Authors have suggested that genes may have existed
as protective mechanisms and evolved through “mutation” or “polymorphisms” that when
exposed to specific environmental stimuli one can exhibit antisocial behaviors (Moosajee, 2003).
In 1993, Brunner et al. confirmed a relationship between a point mutation in the structural gene
for monoamine oxidase (MOA). Neurochemicals are responsible for activating behavioral
patterns in the brain (Elliot, 2000). MOA, an enzyme that acts as a catalyst to oxidize
monoamines, has been shown to be associated with antisocial behaviors and aggression
(Brunner, et al, 1993). MAO-A is necessary for the catabolism of monoamines ingested in food.
These enzymes provide inactivation of monoaminergic neurotransmitters that are highly
associated with antisocial behaviors. Serotonin, norepinephrine (noradrenaline) and epinephrine
(adrenaline) is broken down by MAO-A. Phenethylamine is broken down by MAO-B, but both
break down dopamine.
Serotonin. Serotonin is a neurochemical, responsible for personality traits of anxiety,
depression, and bipolar disorder (Larsen & Buss, 2005). It is also involved with brain
development and is known as a primary neurotransmitter that modulates impulsive aggression
6. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 6
(Leownstein, 2003). Dysfunction of serotonin results in an observed increase of impulsivity and
aggressiveness (Morley & Hall, 2003). Other studies have shown that low level of serotonin is
also associated with emotional aggression (Elliot, 2000). Low levels of serotonin among children
are associated with increased risk of conduct disorder (Elliot, 2000). Low levels of serotonin in
cerebral spinal fluid are associated with large effect size of impulsivity and violence (Linnoila, et
al, 1983).
Norepinephrine. Norepinephrine (epinephrine), a catecholamine and phenethylamine, is a
neurotransmitter in the nervous system that acts as a stress hormone in the brain affecting
attention and impulsivity. Upon exhibiting excessive levels of norepinephrine, irritability,
anxiety, fear, and panic is observed, often leading to aggression, agitation, and psychosis
(Herrmann, 2004). Low levels however are associated with a poor memory, loss of alertness, and
depression.
Dopamine. Dopamine, a neurotransmitter in the brain, associated with pleasure but most
importantly highly associated with aggression. Dopamine is responsible for emotional and
predatory aggression (Elliot, 2000). Genes within this neural pathway is associated with
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (Morley & Hall, 2003).
MOA dysfunction. Heritability is found to be a significant factor among neurotransmitters
and violence. Dysfunction of MOA is influenced from maltreatment during childhood, which
predisposes children to antisocial behaviors (Caspi, 2002). This is due to the MAO having too
low or too high of activity. Having too low or too high activity is further associated with
depression, social phobias, aggression, attention deficit, substance abuse and criminality. While
maltreated children are found to exhibit low-activity of MOA-A, these children were likely to
develop antisocial conduct disorders compared to children with high-activity MOA-A. Children
7. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 7
with low-activity exhibit decreased ability to degrade norepinephrine, which is involved in
sympathetic arousal and rage (Caspi, et al, 2002).
Gene-Environment Interplay: While genetic heritability is shown to be a predisposing factor to
antisocial behaviors, twin studies have demonstrated that not all children who exhibit these
neural dysfunctions exhibit antisocial behaviors in adulthood. This is due to the gene-
environment interplay that can influence the behavior. Similarly among those with MOA
dysfunctions, the primary barrier to influencing association is the environmental stimuli.
Behavioral-genetic studies have documented that environmental stimuli have mediated effects on
antisocial behaviors, whereas these risk factors interact with genetic vulnerability that influences
antisocial behaviors (Caspi, 2006).
Lithium. Lithium, a monovalent ion, is an alkali element that has been approved by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) for short-term prophylactic treatment of aggressive and agitation
behaviors among patients with bipolar I disorder (Dinan, 2002). It is also a common therapeutic
indicator for treating mood stability for children with conduct disorder (Malone, 2001) and for
treating aggressive behaviors among those with schizophrenia (Sachs, et al, 2000). Lithium
(Eskalith, Lithonate, Lithobid) has shown to be 80% effective in treating both manic and
depressive episodes of bipolar I disorder. It also has predictive responses to treat borderline
characteristics, neuroticism, rapid cycling, substance abuse, and manic/depressive symptoms
(Kaplan, 1998)
8. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 8
Pharmacokenetics. After ingestion, lithium is absorbed by the gastrointestional tract and
almost completely eliminated by the kidneys. It is also excreted in breast milk and insignificant
amount in perspiration and feces. Lithium has a half-life of 20-hours with equilibrium after 5-7
hours of medicinal oral ingestion. Lithium affects the thyroid, hematopoietic system, kidneys,
and heart.
Pharmacodynamics. The mechanism of action of lithium involves various
neurotransmitter systems that block inositol phosphatases within the neurons. This inhibition
results in decreased cellular responses to neurotransmitters. The biochemical mechanisms of
action of lithium appear to be multifactorial and intercorrelated among several enzymes,
hormones and vitamins (Schrauzer, 2002). The two major neurotransmitters in the pathogenesis
of affective disorders that are modulated by lithium are serotonin (5HT) and norepinephrine.
Lithium increases serotonin and norepinephrine, and shown to increase grey matter (Sassi, 2002).
Discussion
Gene-Environment Interplay Revisited. While not all those who are genetically predisposed to
antisocial behaviors become violent, those with the gene, when exposed to appropriate
environmental stimuli, are at increased risk of exhibiting antisocial behaviors. This is similar to
alcoholics, while they may have an addictive gene, only when exposed to the appropriate
environmental stimuli (bar, club, etc.), can influence the addictive behavior. Similarly among
those with antisocial and aggressive genes, studies have shown that the environment influences
the genetic predisposition. While the environmental stimuli might be observed as the problem to
an antisocial parent and even the child, this becomes a barrier to seeking treatment. While the
9. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 9
problem of the antisocial child may be seen as a result of the environmental stimuli, throughout
the developmental and learning processes, plasticity of neural network is altered through
environmental pathogens (i.e. bad parenting) that result in antisocial behavioral outcomes (i.e.
hitting, fighting, etc.) of childhood aggression and continues the cycle.
Nonadherence to treatment: As observed with many mood disorders and antisocial behaviors
nonadherence to treatment are common, leading to a barrier to being treated as well. Some
common themes of nonadherance include fear of dependency, side effects, discomfort of
psychiatric diagnosis and most importantly denial of illness (Byrne, 2006) or anosognosia. Before
one is capable of seeking or accepting treatment they first need conscious self-awareness of their
illness.
Self-Awareness deficit. The frontal lobes are critical for understanding and processing of
conscious self-awareness, deception, and to monitor perceptions of reality (Stuss, 2001). Those with
brain lesions to the frontal lobe, similarly among those with antisocial behaviors, often experience life in
the moment or present. These patients generally experience no regard for the past or anticipation of the
future, as defined by characteristics of antisocial and personality disorders. No connection with past, it is
difficult to project into the future (Stuss, 2001). The frontal lobes are also necessary for learning new
activity. When this region is damaged, patients often exhibit disturbed self-awareness that also results in
impaired judgment of objective facts with reference to their self and their own personal lives. i Research
suggests that human beings are interactive entities who base their future on their past experiences. This
behavior can be attributed to the frontal lobes that provide executive functions that “selects, explores,
monitors, modified, and judges nervous system activities. The purpose of this function is to effectively
carry out and plan new activity. However after repeated stress often exhibited form antisocial
behavior, often referred to as restraint stress, which is also common among bipolar disorder,
10. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 10
schizophrenia and PTSD. Further, with chronic stress where the victim adapts to this stimuli as a
method of survival that has been shown to cause structural changes in the hippocampus and
amygdale (Magarinos, 1997). Studies have shown that under restraint stress, structural plasticity
of the hippocampus has been observed, with neurogenesis of the dentate gyrus and dendritic
remodeling (resulting from hypoglucocorticoids in CA3 region (McEwen, 2001). This results in a
patient becoming anosognosic, or not consciously perceiving the difference between what is expected
and what is. They do not recognize the deficits that are clear to others who observe them. Prigatano
(1989) confirmed this further, in that anaosognosics perceive themselves to be normal, similarly to
antisocial and personality behaviors.
The Conscious Awareness System. The Conscious Awareness System (CAS) approach to
understanding the genesis of anosognosia is responsible to experience, remembering, and perceiving
awareness (McGlynn and Schacter, 1989). The CAS is suggested to also be within the parietal lobes.
Lesions to this region affect the executive system causing interruption of the flow of information between
the executive system and the CAS. Damage to this region will result in unawareness leading to problems
in problem-solving, social, behavioral and personality changes, as observed in bipolar disorder and
antisocial behavior. The lack of impaired illness has also been further shown among individuals with
bipolar disorder and schizophrenia via clinicians. Whereas it is common for these patients to not take
their medications because they do not believe they are sick (Lin, 1979). Without conscious awareness
and acceptance of illness, those with antisocial behaviors and personality disorders that lead to
aggressive and violent behaviors are less likely to seek help on their own. Children of antisocial parents
are at particular risk because if the parent exhibits denial of illness, they are likely not to see their
children of having a problem, rather someone or something else is the problem. As a result, this is a
barrier to seek treatment.
11. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 11
Lithium-low level-supplementation. Lithium has been shown to be an effective prophylactic for
the short-term treatment of aggressive and agitation behaviors among patients with bipolar I
disorder and common therapeutic indicator for treating mood stability for children with conduct
disorder, aggressive behaviors, manic and depressive episodes, neuroticism, rapid cycling,
substance abuse, and manic/depressive symptoms. While those with antisocial and violence
behaviors exhibit reduced gray matter, specifically among the amygdala in emotional
dysregulation, low level of serotonin is also common, resulting in an increased risk of conduct
disorder among children. Lithium however has been shown to reverse neurochemical and
neurostructural effects of antisocial behaviors. Whereas lithium is shown to increase gray matter
and increase serotonin, thus improving emotional stability and reducing aggression. Studies have
shown that the incidence of rape, homicide, and suicide were significantly higher in areas where the
drinking water contained little or no lithium. This has confirmed that low level dose of lithium has a
beneficial effect on human behavior (Schrauzer, 1990). Additionally, lithium supplementation has an
effective mood stabilizer and mood improving effect among former drug users, intimate partner violence
perpetrators, and other violent offenders.
Summary/Conclusion
Therapeutic indications of nutritional lithium for controlling aggression and violence behavior.
In summary, this review has accomplished its objective in answering the research question:
lithium supplementation can be a potential public health strategy to reduce and control violence.
While not all those who are genetically predisposed to antisocial behaviors become violent, when
exposed to appropriate environmental stimuli, are at increased risk of exhibiting antisocial
12. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 12
behaviors. While the environmental stimuli might be observed as the problem to an antisocial
parent and even the child, this becomes a barrier to seeking treatment. In addition as observed
with many mood disorders and antisocial behaviors nonadherence to treatment are also common,
leading to a barrier of denying the illness.
Public Health Approach. As a public health approach to reaching this difficult to reach
this anosognosic group, studies suggest that a nutritional lithium supplement may be effective in both
public health suicide and violence prevention programs (Schrauer, 1994). As a result, nutritional
lithium supplement could help close this gap among those with antisocial behaviors who choose
not to seek or accept treatment because of their denial and lack of conscious self-awareness of
illness and help meet the Health People 2010 leading health objective to reduce youth violence.
Dose-Response: Further study however is needed to estimate a lithium dose response. It
would however be appropriate to begin by applying a similar estimate as defined in drinking
water as established by Schrauzer (1990).
Application: Nutritional lithium can be supplemented in established low-level doses in
water or other food sources. These can best be applied among those at most risk in communities
that exhibit high levels of community and youth violence. These sources can be supplemented in
food or water sources in schools as an example.
14. LITHIUM AS A NEUROSCIENCE/PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH 14
McGlynn, S. M., & Schacter, D. L. (1989). Unawareness of deficits in
neuropsychological syndromes. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 143-
205.
Moosajee, M. Violence—a noxious cocktail of genes and the environment. J R Soc Med
2003;96:211-214
Prigatano, G. P. & Schacter, D.L. (1991). Awareness of Deficit After Brain Injury. New York,
NY: Oxford University Press.
Sachs, Printz, Kahn, Carpenter, & Docherty. Expert consensus guidelines: medication
treatment of bipolar disorder 2000. A postgraduate medicine special report. April 2000. The
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Sassi RB, Nicoletti M, Brambilla P, Mallinger AG, Frank E, Kupfer DJ, Keshavan MS,
Soares JC. Increased gray matter volume in lithium-trated bipolar disorder patients. Neurosci
Lett. 2002 Aug 30;329(2):243-5.
Schrauzer GN, Shrestha KP: Lithium in drinking water and the incidences of crimes,
suicides and arrests related to drug addictions. Biol Trace E.em Res 1990;25(2):105-113
Schrauzer G, Vroey E: Effects of nutritional lithium supplementation on mood.
Biological Trace Element Res 1994; 40:89-101
Stuss, DT, Gallup, GG, and Alexander MP. The frontal lobes are necessary for `theory
of mind'. Brain, Vol. 124, No. 2, 279-286, February 2001
Magarinos, A, Verdugo, J, and McEwen, B. Chronic stress alters synaptic terminal structure in
hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA. Vol 94, pp. 14002-14008, December 1997. Neurobiology