• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Evaluate your invention

on

  • 1,590 views

Your invention is good or bad (?) The important thing is to evaluate it... This slide introduce how to practice invention & procedure of evaluation

Your invention is good or bad (?) The important thing is to evaluate it... This slide introduce how to practice invention & procedure of evaluation

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,590
Views on SlideShare
1,123
Embed Views
467

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
23
Comments
0

5 Embeds 467

http://fungsiong.blogspot.com 388
http://fungsiong.blogspot.tw 73
http://fungsiong.blogspot.jp 4
http://fungsiong.blogspot.fr 1
http://fungsiong.blogspot.hk 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Evaluate your invention Evaluate your invention Presentation Transcript

    • Evaluate your invention industrial applicabilityor industrial application is a patentability requirement Industrial Applicability Chen JingFung (Grace) @csie.ntut.edu.tw 2012/03/08Chapter 2 &4, “Patent It Yourself: Your Step-by-Step Guide” 15th, 2011, ISBN: 1413313825
    • Outline• Invention practice• Evaluate your invention – Building a prototype – Commercial concept – Examine it – Secret vs. ask for advice (?) grace@csie.ntut 2
    • Invention practice (1-1)• Problem: – Excavators damage buried cable (or pipes) grace@csie.ntut 3
    • Invention practice (1-2)• Problem: – Excavators damage buried cable (or pipes) – Solution New-use: invention point: “colorful” grace@csie.ntut 4
    • Invention practice (1-3)• Problem: – Police pistols are fired by unauthorized persons Right gay? grace@csie.ntut 5
    • Invention practice (1-4)• Problem: – Police pistols are fired by unauthorized persons – Solution Samarium Cobalt Magnets (SmCo) grace@csie.ntut 6
    • Gyroscopic Top (2-1) Axis-cycle• Problem: is stably ? Fig ref: boomerangs.com – Mr. Brown found hardly set a gyroscope’s rotor in motion • Principle – a spinning wheel set in a movable frame. When the wheel spins, it retains its spatial orientation, and it resists external forces applied to it. • Application – used in navigation instruments (for ships, planes, and rockets) Foucault, FR physicist, 1st person demo it likes earth rotates 1851) Fig ref: scienceblogs.com 7 grace@csie.ntut
    • Gyroscopic Top (2-2) US3945146 (1976)• Problem: – Mr. Brown found hardly set a gyroscope’s rotor in motion Foucault, FR physicist, 1851)• Solution: – Inventor: Paul L. Brown’s (Wiz-z-erTM) 1st royalty = 5 x his annual salary USD322100 (1991) Photo ref: ta0.com 8 grace@csie.ntut
    • Xerography (3-1)• Problem: – Daily job need to review many patents – Copying documents cost much time & operating complicatedly carbon paper be patented in 1806 grace@csie.ntut 9
    • Xerography (3-2) • Problem: carbon paper be patented in 1806 – Copying US2297691 documents cost time & operating complicatedly • Solution – Mr. Carlson, a patent attorney, invented a light- reflection copier at his spare time • Kodak rejected his propose • Haloid Co. accepted it & changed its name to Xerox Co. grace@csie.ntut 10http://www.xerox.com/innovation/chester-carlson-xerography/enus.html
    • Summary – invention skills (4-1)• Most inventions’ creation by Ivory® Ad: “It Floats!” recognizing a problem & finding a solution – KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid!) • One important principle to successful inventing – “Accident” -> “Good idea” • Ex. A worker left the soap-making machine on too long, causing air to be dispersed into the soap mixture as Ivory® – P&G ordered the extended mix time as a standard setting 11 grace@csie.ntut
    • Summary – invention skills (4-2)• Most inventions’ creation by recognizing a problem & finding a solution – Try to conceive of ramifications to enhance its value • If you have trouble => use nonlinear tech. let go of assumptions… – Beware of the novice inventors’ PGL • Paranoia, Greed, Laziness Paranoia Laziness Greed grace@csie.ntut 12
    • Why evaluate your invention (1-1)• Reason – Avoid needless expense & effort, don’t spend significant time or money on your creation – Should proceed: • Put your creation to be sold profitably for a significant period of time Over x 20 Cost1 To spend for Cost1: searching,$100,000 in building a model profits or & patenting royalties grace@csie.ntut 13
    • Why evaluate your invention (1-2)• Misconception: “patented failure” – Get a patent will be assured of fame & fortune – “It is to be remembered, that the pursuit of wealth by means of new inventions is a very precarious and uncertain one; • a lottery where there are many thousand tickets for each prize.” —Eli Whitney grace@csie.ntut 14
    • Patent Application: PPA vs. RPA Utility patent (RPA)• RPA: Regular Patent Application has 1 yr secret!! “1 yr rule”: 35USC 102 The invention is 1st 1 yr to start sold for sale test marketing File a valid patent application• PPA: Provisional Patent Application Almost a yr Apply PPA to test File a RPA market Examining it is feasible (?) grace@csie.ntut 15
    • Building a prototype• How to evaluate your invention? Task board – Building a prototype to test operability • Try to have them made of cardboard by an economical prototyping technique Fig ref: xqa.com.ar • Simulation by computer-world simulation » Ensure a field trial success reduces GaN HEMT (transistors) • Consult with a single expert production costs (< 1/3) in mobile base station amplifiers for 3G and beyond ref: fujitsu.com (IEDM 2004) grace@csie.ntut 16
    • Commercial concept• How to make your invention to generate a significant profit? – Problem: • How to promote, how well it’s designed, how well it’s packaged, the mood of the market, what time it 1st show (debut) … – Most marketing experts say: five “P” factors • Production • Price • Position (its place in the market) • Promotion • Perseverance grace@csie.ntut 17
    • Intangible factors for market – Talented design $60,000 USD Swiss 18K gold Westminster Chime carillon minute $15 RMB repeater by Constant Piguet circa 1900. vs. Fine 34 jewel frosted gilt movement with four hammers striking on four Fig ref: china.alibaba.com gongs and silent centrifugal Fig ref: bogoff.com governor. – Trademark (good slogan) Slogan: Slogan: “The daily diary of“Roaches check American Dream” in, but theydon’t check out” Fig ref: sillyslogan.com Fig ref: eamonn.com grace@csie.ntut 18
    • Commercial feasibility evaluation• Despite the marketing uncertainties to take your time run some scientific & objective work in 4 areas • Positive (+) & negative (-) marketing factors – attached to your invention + • Consultation - – with experts, potential users of the invention, marketing people, and others • Research – into prior developments in the same area as your invention, and • The operability of an actual construction of the invention grace@csie.ntut 19
    • “+” & “-” factors evaluation 20 grace@csie.ntut Ref: Patent It Yourself book P.499
    • “+” & “-” factors test (1-1)• Weight (-100 ~ 100) – Assign advantage or disadvantage weight on commercial value• Balance scale analogy – Help you understand the “+” & “-” factors – Don’t be used with any true quantitative accuracy – Team work: • discuss to a common criteria for evaluation Bias • Avoid bias grace@csie.ntut 21
    • “+” & “-” factors test (1-2)• Consider each negative value carefully – Even the negative value cause to change design or produce new production equipment – Keep to improvement it as early as possible • Didn’t justify the cost of replacing existing production equipment, or the cost associated with manufacturing & promoting the device• The positive factors – Great value to you help to convince a patent examiner • Proof: your invention’s patentability • Or when selling the invention to a potential licensee – Potential licensee: any organization or industry wanting to commercially utilize an invention 22 grace@csie.ntut
    • “+” & “-” factors summary• Summary those “+” & “-” factor for commercial evaluation purposes to a list – Make you focus on drawbacks (1 ~ more) – Provide a way of comparing 2 different inventions for relative value • Let you concentrate more effort on – “Sell” your invention to PTO, a potential licensee, or a judge (fight existing patents) • Examiner -><- you : unobvious – Best prove by new & unexpected (superior) results of the type listed above grace@csie.ntut 23
    • Use the techniques of Consultation & Research• Avoid bias to take the wrong path -> extend your investigation by doing some consultation & research – Make sure the field of your invention – Do your patentability search, • Using backgrounds to improve your ability – Prepare your application, – Market your invention & Protect – Deal with the PTO invention grace@csie.ntut 24
    • Call help – lay friends• Ask both nonprofessionals and experts in the particular field for an opinion, and researching the relevant literature – Tool: the positive and negative factors evaluation list – Nonprofessionals • They will tell you a consumer item what they like to purchase – Lay friends • Their opinion you trust and feel will be objective• Build a Working Model (WM) – Inquire as to what price they’d be willing to pay – Show WM to them and ask if they’d buy it and for what price grace@csie.ntut 25
    • Call help – Experts• Experts to be consulted in the particular field, they can supply you with relevant feedback – Salespeople and buyers in stores that sell devices similar to yours – Friends who are “in the business.” – Engineers, managers, or technicians in companies in the field of your invention – Scholars, educators, or professors who do research in the area of your invention – Pay $$ to use the independent invention evaluation • Ex. WISC (about USD $500), I2 Innovation Institute (about USD $200), MIC (about USD$160 ~ USD$5,000) … grace@csie.ntut 26
    • Nondisclosure vs. Disclosure Keep secret Ask for advice grace@csie.ntut 27
    • The part of Non- disclosure Agreement • Keeping Trade Secrets Richard Stim, Attorney, Nondisclosure Agreement for Inventors, March 2008, 6th Editiongrace@csie.ntut 28 Ref: Patent It Yourself book P.489-490
    • The template for Invention Disclosure 29 grace@csie.ntut Ref: Patent It Yourself book P.491
    • Summary• Start to practicing invention & evaluating it (invention) – Review the procedure as • Building a prototype, • Commercial concept, • check it again, and • Secret vs. ask for advice grace@csie.ntut 30
    • Reference• David Pressman, chapter 2 &4, “Patent It Yourself: Your Step-by-Step Guide” to Filing at the U.S. Patent Office, 2011, 15th edition, ISBN-10: 1413313825• Foucault pendulum in action at Houston Museum of Natural Science – about 180 degrees in 24 hours• Blog: http://fungsiong.blogspot.com/ – Introduce hybrid TV (hbbTV) including widget design, Android technology (API), system, ecosystem, framework, service, application…, – Agile for progressing: http://fungsiong.blogspot.com/search/label/Agile • About how to teamwork – Some programming info. as Apache wookie, refactoring tech, CE-HTML, a solution about removing a backdoor “Trojan” & surveillance paper grace@csie.ntut 31