Exposing the myth of vaccination essential information you need to know to be fully informed
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Like this? Share it with your network


Exposing the myth of vaccination essential information you need to know to be fully informed

Uploaded on

The evidence based science of why vaccines are not safe, why vaccines do not protect us as touted and why vaccines are not the reason for the decrease and elimination of disease. How to strengthen ...

The evidence based science of why vaccines are not safe, why vaccines do not protect us as touted and why vaccines are not the reason for the decrease and elimination of disease. How to strengthen your immune system naturally, breast health-mammograms versus thermography, safe natural cancer cures the FDA is suppressing, amalgam fillings, flouride in the water, pesticides and neurotoxins in our food, GMO's, recommended websites, documentaries and books for further research, High dose liposomal C and Lipospheric C therapy. All work is properly cited and referenced from the FDA, CDC, Pink Book of the CDC, NIH, WHO, PubMed, prestigious journals, top experts in their field, vaccine inserts, material safety data sheet and governments from around the world.
1. MUST WATCH! FREE FOR A SHORT TIME ON YOU TUBE. Full Documentary "Silent Epidemic: The Untold Story Of Vaccines" - slide 143 of Power Point.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1m3TjokVU4 108 minutes

Opening night of "Silent Epidemic: The Untold Story of Vaccines" on opening night
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjYaEeMgXZk 34 minute trailer

See all of Gary Nulls Documentaries on Natural Health and Healing -http://www.gnhealthyliving.com/Scripts/pfprod-dvdscds.asp

ORDER YOUR Silent Epidemic: The Untold Story Of Vaccines DVD - http://www.gnhealthylivHng.com/Scripts/pfprodview.asp?idproduct=1222

2. MUST WATCH! How Vaccines Harm Child Brain Development - Dr Russell Blaylock MD. (Neurosurgeon)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QBcMYqlaDs#t=417 88 minutes

3. MUST WATCH! How the studies that doctors site as evidence are skewed (lied about) in the pharmaceuticals favor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-3yrrgkcLY&feature=youtu.be 8 minutes
I go into 3 other ways that the pharmaceuticals twist and distort the truth.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 126

http://www.drgreenmom.com 63
http://www.scoop.it 61
https://twitter.com 1
http://www.pinterest.com 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Exposing the Myth of Vaccination; Essential Information You Need To Know To Be Fully Informed
  • 2. THE MILGRAM EXPERIMENT Demonstrates that people will give up their autonomy and ability to reason and think for themselves, dismiss what their conscience tells him/her and will hurt and/or even kill another human because a person of authority such as a teacher, principal, physician, politician, health official, government official, pastor or police officer tells him/her to do so. This is what is going on with vaccination. Just because a person in a white coat says vaccines are necessary and good for you does not make it true. Milgram Experiment Video – 8 ½ minutes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8olVHKgIBXc
  • 3. WATCH THE VIDEOS & READ THE ARTICLES BELOW BEFORE YOU READ THIS POWER POINT TO GET THE PROPER PERSPECTIVE OF HOW SERIOUS THE GOV‘T AND MEDICAL COMMUNITY IS ON MANDATORY VACCINATION • http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CbnSk-1QLrg medical community trying to censor the freedom of expression about vaccines, coercion to force vaccination by withholding the medication a patient needs etc. 10 minutes • http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LBMhY1E_UPU Firing of a 21 year veteran nurse who missed only 4 days during that time period and is fired for not accepting the flu shot 8 minutes • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9FB1nBTnR8&list=UUTbv00llRk6swnpCjrXiAhg 2013 summary of Vaccination. 11 minutes • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AazObF_pHSU Confession of a 15 year Pharmaceutical Rep. ―Pharma, Not in Business of Health, Healing, Cures, Wellness.‖ 7 minutes • http://www.naturalnews.com/040091_police_state_petition_Mark_Dice.html Proof that the American people are dumbed down as they sign petitions from banning the 2nd amendment to instating a Nazi run state to injection unlimited amounts of mercury into children 7.5 minutes • http://vactruth.com/2013/04/29/vaccine-refusedapplication/?utm_source=The+Vaccine+Truth+Newsletter&utm_campaign=39b65cabf4-04_29_2013_refused&utm_medium=email Government Funded Phone App Tracks ―Vaccine Refusers‖ • http://vactruth.com/2013/04/26/police-state-registry-system/ ―Police State‖ Registry System Being Set Up to Track Your Vaccination Status DO NOT FALL INTO THE PASSIVE DUMBING MODE WHILE OUR STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS STRIP OUR RIGHTS AND FREEDOM AS IS CURRENTLY HAPPENING. In 1963 a report from the IRON MOUNTAIN THINK TANK, which included Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller concluded that the best way to control a large population during peacetime and to increase corporate profits is the use of fear. Fear of terrorism. Fear of economic recession/depression and fear of pandemics. The Government is also using these situations to slowly erode and strip us of our freedom and rights.
  • 4. •Warning: Enrolling in Obamacare allows government to link your IP address with your name, social security number, bank accounts and web surfing habits • Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/042427_Obamacare_pri vate_details_Trojan_Horse.html#ixzz2ifLKLBtf • USE A COMPUTER FROM A LIBRARY OR DO NOT SIGN UP AT ALL AS I AM DOING • USE A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PASSWORD FROM ALL OTHER PASSWORDS YOU USE WITH CAPITOL LETTERS AND NUMBERS
  • 5. “First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.” Mahatma Gandhi The International Bill of Human Rights which applies to all countries states that "an intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the person concerned has given free and informed consent". Freedom is not merely the opportunity to do as one pleases; neither is it merely the opportunity to choose between set alternatives. Freedom is, first of all, the chance to formulate the available choices, to argue over them -- and then, the opportunity to choose. - C. Wright Mills Studies have shown statistically that when people are challenged with a new idea that 96% will spend their time defending their beliefs and only 4% will embrace a new idea. The right to have total control to what is put into your body and to make informed decisions about your health is slowly being stripped away, replaced by the choice of profit over what is best for an individuals health. Doctors have taken an oath to do no harm but many unwittingly and some knowingly are doing just that. Where is the independent long term science and studies that show that the vaccines injected into us are safe and that they do work at least to the point that the benefits outweigh the risks? Where are the studies of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children? There are none! Studies that are done are short term and important information is left out and/or skewed in the pharmaceutical favor as reported by Cochrane Collaboration which is an international network of more than 28,000 dedicated people from over 100 countries that work together to help healthcare providers, policy-makers, patients, their advocates and caretakers, make well-informed decisions about health care based on evidenced-based science. We are raised to believe and to trust what our medical providers tells us without questioning what they are saying or the procedures they are doing to us and when some of us do, we are subjected to being sued in court by physicians to be forced to take radiation and chemotherapy instead of the choice to have alternative therapy or thousands of parents are threatened with jail if they do not have there children vaccinated for school while the exemption form is hidden in a corner of the same room. Physicians are firing their patients if the parents disagree with the vaccination schedule. There are huge conflicts of interest with the people that make decisions on the vaccination schedule Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) either having previously worked for a pharmaceutical or start working for a pharmaceutical company soon after leaving their position. Schools receive extra money from the government for every vaccinated child. Hospitals, through quality assurance programs, can receive extra money from the government if certain numbers of health care workers (HCW) are vaccinated (http://www.hhs.gov/ash/initiatives/hai/hcpflu.html. Dr. Paul Offit was paid a large financial sum by Merck to co-invent the rotavirus vaccine and also sat on the ACIP committee. Many conflicts of interest exist. FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAIL! When ever adverse reactions occur due to vaccination it is immediately dismissed as coincidence or the physician assumes the patient is genetically defective instead of asking the question ―is there a link between vaccination and adverse reactions‖? There are numerous independent studies showing that vaccination can and does cause various degrees of damage and inflammation in the body and brain leading to many disabilities, disease and even death while not protecting us as promised. Giving the overwhelming data that vaccines do have a correlation and causation with the disease, disabilities and death why should we be forced to vaccinate to get a job, keep a job or to attend school or be forced to wear a mask like a scarlet letter. 1.
  • 6. A Short History of Mandatory Vaccination Edward Jenner In 1717 the wife of the British Ambassador to Turkey, Lady Mary Wortley Montague (1689- 1762) introduced the small pox vaccination to Europe. In 1796 a English physician named Edward Jenner (1749-1823) noticed that milkmaids seemed to not have the deeper marks on their face representative of smallpox and theorized that inoculating the pus from a cowpox pustule ( a milder form of Orthopox) from the skin of an infected milkmaid, 9 year old Sarah Nelmes into a healthy 8 year old boy, James Phipps would allow the subject to develop immunity to the more deadly smallpox. Jenner exposed James Phipps to smallpox and he became mildly ill and fully recovered. Jenner assumed that cowpox is smallpox of the cow and that he stated that he was conferring lifetime immunity to his subject. Vaccination was achieved by cutting 4 lines into the arm or shoulder and smearing the pus of cowpox into the cuts and was invasive, unsanitary and often disfiguring. Eight days later , the liquid from the blisters were injected into the arm of the patients. Complications included secondary infections, Gangrene and transmittance of Syphilis by Spirochetes, found in cows and tuberculosis which reduced the enthusiasm for vaccination but was considered necessary for the good of the society. Cowpox was not a natural disease of cows. It came about by farmers milking cows right after cleaning infections in other animals or from doing any other farm chore. There was no consistency in what was really in the smallpox vaccine one was to be administered with. The original vaccine consisted of scabs, pus, sero-saginous discharge and glycerine. Tuberculosis and Syphilis was transmitted by arm-to-arm technique where pustule material was drawn from a corpses arm until it was outlawed in 1898. Other areas where Jenner acquired his pus from was horse hooves (grease), thinking that cowpox was harbored in the infectious hoof, and from pustules on cows and humans who were infected with smallpox. Syphilis deaths before 1853 averaged 380 deaths/year in infants less than 1 year and 30 years after the compulsory vaccination of 1853 there were an average of 1813 deaths/year and rising. James Phipps was vaccinated 20 times and Jenner also vaccinated his son. James Phipps died at 20 and Jenner‘s son died at 21. Both acquired tuberculosis which some researchers have linked to the vaccination. Jenner tricked the medical community into believing cowpox was smallpox in a cow, totally inaccurate and that his vaccine was the cure. The Smallpox ( Orthopox variola) vaccine was the only vaccine that used its close relative the cowpox (Orthopox vaccinia). According to the work of Walter Hadwen MD (1854 -1932) , a celebrated English surgeon, author and medical scholar of a century ago, Jenner was not a physician. He never earned a degree or diploma in medical study. In fact he bought his medical degree for 15 pounds from St. Andrew‘s College in Scotland, which he never attended. If you ask to see the Jenner‘s diploma at the Jenner Museum in Gloucestershire, England, you will be told ―we don‘t have it‖. There was no standardized medical education at this time and there were at least 19 different licensing bodies offering designation of a Physician. One could become a doctor by attending a university, becoming an apprentice or purchasing the title as Edward Jenner did. 2.
  • 7. Jenner tested his theory on one patient and immediately claimed lifetime immunity for his patient and that it would work universally with no research and no clinical trials. The concept of immunity was accepted with no understanding of immunity. In 1798 Jenner wrote about his experiments and presented his booklet to the Royal Society who turned it down. Rejected by his peers, Jenner published the book himself. If a researcher today failed peer review and then self-published, how would the work be received? In 1799, a number of children were vaccinated by a Mr. Drake with cowpox matter obtained by Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been effective. Although Edward Jenner did not report the results of these children, Dr. Hughes later reported that the children subsequently had developed smallpox showing that the technique had not worked. Jenner had apparently received the report, but decided to ignore these results that were not in support of his theory. In 1818, Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession ―could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice.‖ But after vaccinating 1,200 cases he stated he was disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that after vaccination people still could contract and even die from smallpox and that he could no longer support the practice. Jenner repeatedly petitioned the House of Commons in 1802 and 1807 and several years after his claim of lifetime immunity the House of Commons saw a way that millions of pounds could change hands by passing a compulsory smallpox vaccination law. Jenner was awarded the equivalent of $500,000 today by a vote of 59 to 56 and was catapulted into the status of a revered scientist. The 1840 act in England made Lady Mary Wortley Montague‘s variolation illegal and also provided optional vaccine free of charge. During the first 50 years of vaccination clergy, pharmacists and midwives administered the vaccine. Physicians saw vaccination as a medical procedure and a way to raise their status and increase their income and they argued this should only be done by a physician. Edward Jenner‘s ivory vaccination points, 1821 In 1853 the United Kingdom passed a compulsory law for vaccination and other countries soon followed. This law was the foundation in which the medical profession was built and was passed based on false data. The British Parliament created the epidemiological Society of London in 1850 to study the efficacy of the smallpox vaccine and was asked to prove the premise that more unvaccinated people died from smallpox than did vaccinated people. A flawed premise to begin which was sure to skew the numbers to make sure that this premise ended up being proven. If a person contracted smallpox, he/she was considered unvaccinated. If a person died during an infection with smallpox he/she was considered improperly vaccinated and fell under unvaccinated. Mortality rates were counted in the hospitals and all who died were considered to be unvaccinated. The most important fact that 90% of all infected recovered without any problems was not included in the statistics. Parents who 3.
  • 8. did not comply with inoculation of their child were fined and if they had no assets to sell to pay the fines the father was jailed for two weeks. Physicians were the largest proponent that vaccination was the only way to prevent smallpox and every unvaccinated person was stigmatized as a spreader of disease just as the health and medical system is doing today by forcing healthcare workers to wear masks if unvaccinated with the flu vaccine. The Royal Commission of Vaccination was formed by Parliament in 1889 to resolve disputes between vaccinators and non vaccinators. After seven years they issued a final report that vaccination did partially contribute to decrease of smallpox and did cause increase in Syphilis and introduced a new compulsory Vaccination Act in 1898 with a the conscience objection clause that stated you cannot refuse vaccination because of religious reasons or that it was merely wrong to vaccinate but investigated the issue and was neither irrational or negligent. The conscientious objector was intelligent, loving and devoted to protecting his children. The conscientious objector was not clearly defined and the magistrates could set their own standards and refuse petitions at will and use the petitions as a source of persecution. The compromise did not satisfy either side and another Vaccine Act was introduced in 1907 repealing the requirement that a parent must satisfy the magistrate and can obtain a conscientious objection without being questioned or refused. That same year the applications for conscientious objector tripled. By 1908 the anti-vaccinators were silenced due to legally being able to obtain an exemption. By 1946 the British Government repealed the vaccination requirements for smallpox because half of the parents were claiming conscientious exemptions and to the dismay of pro-vaccinators the number of smallpox outbreaks fell along with the decrease of vaccination. Prussia implemented the earliest mandatory vaccination law for smallpox in 1834 and kept very detailed records of the vaccination. Prussia was the most vaccinated country in the1800‘s. Every infant must be vaccinated and revaccinated starting school. After graduation the child had to be vaccinated again, and then once more upon entering the Army. Those that refused were forced to be vaccinated 10 times. We can conclude that there was nearly 100% vaccination rate. Dr. Walter Hadwen had access to the detailed medical records and after 35 years of vaccinating and revaccinating there was a smallpox epidemic of one million cases that killed 124, 978. Before the Compulsory Vaccination Act of 1853 the highest number of deaths in England due to smallpox in a 2 year period was 2,000. From 1857-1859 there were 14,244 deaths. From 1863-1865 there were 20,059 deaths and in 1867 the parliament enacted a stricter vaccination law and 97% of the people were vaccinated and in 1870 - 1872 there were 44, 840 deaths due to smallpox. Following Jenner‘s death the vaccine establishment used one excuse after another to explain the failure of vaccination: the number of punctures was incorrect, or that re-vaccination was necessary or that the lymph was impure. Another method to hide the cases of smallpox that was contracted in a vaccinated person was to rename it and record it in hospital as ―pustular eczema.‖• 4.
  • 9. Tebb wrote in 1884, ―Vaccination was made compulsory by an Act of Parliament in the year 1853; again in 1867; and still more stringent in 1871. Since 1853, we have had three epidemics of small-pox, each being more severe than the one preceding.‖• 97% of England population was vaccinated as a result of the more stringent 1867 law. Epidemics Dates Increase population Increase in Smallpox Deaths from Smallpox 1st 1857, 58 - 59 14,244 2nd 1863, 64 - 65 7% 50% 20,059 3rd 1870,71- 72 10% 120% 44,840 Deaths from smallpox in first 10 years after compulsory vaccination, 1854 – 1863 33,515 In second 10 years, 1864 – 1873 70,458 The irrefutable fact is that smallpox deaths increased with vaccination and declined with declining vaccination rates. To answer a parliamentary question by the British Minister of Health on July 16th, 1923, a written list of figures of vaccinations and deaths from 1872 - 1921 was presented. The figures here are averaged into 10 year periods. Years 1872-1881 1882-1891 1892 - 1901 1902 - 1911 1912 - 1921 Vaccinations percent of births Deaths from Smallpox Deaths from Smallpox per 100,000 population 85.5 1,999 15.2 82.2 923 34.1 68.0 436 1.4 67.4 395 1.2 43.5 12 0.1 You can see from these figures that as compliance with vaccination went down so did the death rate England ended compulsory vaccination in 1907, along with Holland in 1928 and Australia in 1925, the U.S.A. was starting up mandatory vaccination. The first vaccination took place in the US in 1801 and the first mandatory vaccination law was passed in Massachusetts in 1809 following with the first state requiring vaccination to enroll in school. During 1901 – 02 an outbreak occurred in Boston, MA an ordinance was passed to be vaccinated or fined five dollars the equivalent of $118 today. Health officials were going around with physicians and police officers force vaccinating citizens. 5.
  • 10. One of four MA citizens that refused to comply with the ordinance was Rev. Henning Jacobson. He took his case to the supreme court where in 1905 it ruled that states had the right to force vaccinate its citizens if the state deemed that was the best way to protect the community from disease. In other words the protection of the public supersedes individual interest for the ―greater good.‖ The only stipulation to the states is that enforcement must not be ―unreasonable, arbitrary or oppressive.‖ Some states than moved to protecting individual rights and created exemptions by personal belief, medical and religious which are now being stripped away. By 1929 only 9 states had the smallpox vaccine as compulsory because of too many deaths and complications. Not one case of smallpox was reported between 1950 – 1970. After world war 1 there was a surplus of smallpox vaccine and the U.S. in 1917 mandated a vaccination program in the Philippines. 25 million shots were administered and the results were devastating. 163,000 developed smallpox and 75,339 Filipinos died from the disease. Quadruple the death rate prior to vaccination. More Filipinos died from this mass vaccination than in the Vietnam war but nothing was mentioned about it on the news. The last known case of smallpox in the U.S. was in 1948 but vaccination was continued until 1963. As a result there were 5,000 hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis and an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as result of smallpox vaccination. The authors of this study reported that the death rates were probably much higher because three of seven deaths definitely related to vaccines did not appear in the search for death certificates. After the epidemic of 1872 which hit Leicester, England worse than London, England the community started rejecting vaccination and between 1890-1898 less than 5% of infants were vaccinated. Around the same time Leicester greatly improved the sanitation system. Between 1878 – 1889 there was a total of 11 smallpox deaths in a population of 200,000. The statistics to the left compared Leicester to the rest of UK in other areas of the world and with Japan. During that time survival rates soared and smallpox death rates sharply decreased in Leicester Before the passing of the Public Health Act of l875 in England, every succeeding epidemic of smallpox was worse than its predecessor in spite of more and more compulsory vaccination; but with less and less vaccination and vast improvements in sanitation smallpox has greatly decreased. 6.
  • 11. From Dr. Hadwen‘s Publication "Truth," January 17, 1923. SANITATION v. VACCINATION. ―I remember Sheffield and its epidemic in 1887-8. No less than 98 per cent of the population had been vaccinated; it was the best vaccinated town in the kingdom the public vaccinators had reaped a richer harvest of bonuses for "successful vaccination" than those of any other town, and yet they had 7,000 cases of smallpox. It originated and clung to an unsanitary area of 175 acres covered with cesspits—which was called The Croft. The medical profession helplessly cried "vaccinate" and "re-vaccinate"—as if the pubic had not already had enough of it. At last the flood-gates of heaven were mercifully opened, and the bountiful rains suddenly accomplished what 56,000 vaccinations had failed to effect.‖ There are many more citations of how sanitation has greatly reduced disease in Dr. Hadwen‘s publication ―Truth.‖ In 1872 Japan started compulsory vaccination and in 1892 there were more than 165,000 cases of smallpox and 30,000 deaths with 100% of the Japanese people vaccinated every 5-7 years and over 25,000,000 recorded vaccinations. During the same time period in Australia there was no compulsory vaccination and over a 15 year time span there were only 3 deaths due to smallpox. Dr. G.F. Kolb, of the Royal Statistical Commission of Bavaria, officially states: ―In the kingdom of Bavaria, where no one for many years, except the newly born, escaped vaccination, there were in the epidemic of 1871 no less than 30,742 cases of smallpox, of whom 29,429 had been vaccinated, as is shown by the documents of the State Department.‖ The Lancet (London) of July 15, 1871 editorially states: ―The deaths from smallpox have assumed the proportions of a plague. Over 10,000 lives have been sacrificed during the past year in England and Wales. In London, 5,641 deaths have occurred since Christmas. Of 9,392 patients in the London smallpox hospitals, no less than 6,854 had been vaccinated, i.e. nearly 73 per cent. Taking the mortality at 17.5 percent of those attacked, and the deaths this year in the whole country at 10,000 it will follow that more than 122,000 vaccinated persons have suffered from smallpox. This is an alarming state of things. Can we greatly wonder that the opponents of vaccination should point to such statistics as an evidence of the failure of the system? It is necessary to speak plainly on this important matter.‖ John H. Tilden M.D. (1851-1940) said of smallpox: ―The disease is one of filth, not only on the outside of the body, but also on the inside of the body. When people learn to live correctly, and domestic and civic sanitation is what it should be, it will be impossible for this disease to get a foothold even in the lightest form. There is no question but that perfect sanitation has almost obliterated this disease, and sooner or later will dispose of it entirely. Of course, when that time comes, in all probability the credit will be given to vaccination. Smallpox is considered one of the most virulent of contagious diseases, and it is generally believed that persons exposed are almost invariably attacked, unless protected by vaccination. This is one of the most stupendous exaggerations to be found in medical literature. My experience has been that very few people take it when exposed to it.‖ John H. Tilden M.D. (1851-1940) 7.
  • 12. Below is the definitive statistical proof that shows that diseases were well on their way out before vaccines were introduced in the U.S world war II Deaths per 100,000, U.S. Vaccine introduced (early 1940‘s) 1948 1963 1945 Year Diphtheria Pertussis Measles Influenza 1900 40.3 12.2 13.3 202.2 1910 21.1 11.6 12.4 155.9 1920 15.3 12.5 8.8 207.3 1930 4.9 4.8 3.2 102.5 1940 1.1 2.2 .5 70.3 1945 1.2 1.3 .2 51.6 1950 .3 .7 .3 31.3 1955 .1 .3 .2 27.1 1960 0 .1 .2 37.3 1970 0 0 0 30.9 Reference: U.S. Department of Comm. Historical Statistics of the U.S. Part 1 Bureau of Census 1975 (found in any U.S. Library) Vaccine introduced1954 early 1940‘s 1948 mid 1940‘s 1963 1945 only used in 1976 2007 Year Polio Diphtheria Pertussis Tetanus Measles Influenza Swine Flu Avian flu 1901 48,839 33,094 28,065 11,956 15,496 190628,225 26,436 16,318 10,837 10,109 191120,350 20,285 11,503 7,618 7,086 191615,623 21,382 8,596 7,926 54,283 19217,229 12,267 14,724 7,818 4,919 13,673 19266,038 7,074 13,047 6,040 3,994 17,062 19314,545 4,388 9,850 4,709 2,957 11,191 19363,666 2,189 6,809 3,275 1,238 8,449 19413,539 1,135 4,399 2,384 1,013 4,366 19463,799 467 1,460 1,697 469 1,736 19513,826 125 558 1,093 268 1,178 19561,604 45 206 788 203 938 19611,076 22 82 550 162 553 1966928 15 32 282 44 633 1971-75 0 12 122 122 17 491 Reference: International Mortality Statistics by Michael Rowland Alderson Hardcover, 524 Pages, Published 1981 by Facts On File ISBN-13: 978-0-87196-514-1, ISBN: 0-87196-514-3 8.
  • 13. Did We Really Need Vaccines? The graphs below, are based on the official death numbers as recorded in the Official Year Books of the Commonwealth of Australia. 90% of all disease mortality disappeared by the time vaccines were introduced due mainly to improved sanitation and hygiene along with clean drinking water, hand washing, improved nutrition and natural herd immunity, not vaccine immunity ( examined later on). From an independent source with no ties to vaccinate or not to vaccinate ―the death rate of diphtheria, measles and whooping cough declined 95% among children from 1911-1945, before the mass immunization program started in the United States.‖ Reference: Dublin L, Health progress, 1935-1945, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, pg. 12, 1948 9.
  • 14. Deaths 1887 1888 1889 Totals (men/women) (men/women) (men/women) (men/women) Under Twenty 5,997/5,983 7,349/7,353 5,626/5,631 18,972/18,968 Over Twenty 2,459/1,810 1,990/1,418 1,296/863 5,745/4,091 An article in the New York Medical Journal, edited by Frank P. Foster M.D., in its issue of July 22, 1899 contains an article, entitled ―Vaccination in Italy‖ written by Charles Ruata, M.D., Professor of Hygiene and of Materica Medica in the University of Perugia, Italy, in which he demonstrates by the presentation of the most trustworthy official statistics that preventive vaccination in that country has been a complete and certain failure. Professor Ruata prefaces his article with the following affirmation: ―Italy is one of the best vaccinated countries in the world, if not the best of all, and we can prove that mathematically.‖ He says: ―Our young men, with few exceptions, at the age of twenty years must enter the army, where a regulation prescribes compulsory vaccination.‖ After having quoted the official statistics of the Italian Government as proof of his assertion, he says: ―For twenty years before 1885, our nation was vaccinated in the proportion of 98.5 per cent. Notwithstanding, the epidemics of smallpox that we have had have been something so frightful that nothing before the invention of vaccination could equal them.‖ In Italy, having a population of 30,000,000, 98.5 percent of whom were officially declared vaccinated, Dr. Ruata goes on to say: ―During the year 1887, we had 16,249 deaths from smallpox; in 1888, 18,110 and in 1889, 13,413.‖ In referring to the Italian army in which ―vaccination had been performed twice a year in the most satisfactory manner for may years past,‖ Dr. Ruata says: ―Now we see that soldiers not protected because vaccinations did not ‗take‘ were less attacked by smallpox than those ‗duly protected‘ by the good results of their re-vaccination; and that the death-rate in those vaccinated with good results was greater than among those in whom vaccination did not take.‖ In regard to the vaccine material used, Dr. Ruata says: ―I have limited my analysis to the last six years, during which time the only lymph used in all our army has been animal lymph, exclusively, furnished by the Government Institute for the production of animal lymph.‖ After having cited the government statistics, which sustain his conclusion, Prof. Ruata remarks: ―The ‗duly protected‘ soldiers were attacked by smallpox in a proportion double that among ‗unprotected‘ soldiers. These are official statements, extremely trustworthy because they were made in a country where and at a time when, no one thought that it was possible to raise a doubt against the dogma of vaccination. In our country,‖ he continues, ―we have no league against vaccination, and every father thinks that vaccination is one of his first duties. For these reasons no bias could exist against vaccination in making these statistics.‖ At that time in Italy men and women have received the same number of vaccination until the men enter the army, mandatory at age 20 and again are vaccinated. Yet, over 20 years of age, many more men than women die of small-pox, while under 20 the mortality is equal, again demonstrating that vaccination increases small-pox mortality! 28.8% increase in smallpox death due to vaccination. 10.
  • 15. General mortality also decreased after 1800 more rapidly than before 1800. Yet the Royal Commissioners declared that vaccination produced the decrease of small-pox, but there was no improvement in sanitation in the beginning of the nineteenth century, as compared with the latter part of the eighteenth century, to account for the difference. Dr. Hadwen, in an Appendix to his "Vaccination a Delusion," has given an account of a number of improvements affecting health at this very period which is: (1) That many West-end squares and suburbs were built at this very period, and were inhabited chiefly by city people. (2) That the streets were more systematically cleaned and the roads improved. (3) That the water supply was much improved. (4) That potatoes, tea, and coffee came into more general use; while the better roads allowed more fresh meat, vegetables and milk to be used. (5) Cemeteries were formed outside London and many City graveyards were permanently closed. First, let us mentally step back in time about 250 years and imagine the circumstances in a typical large city. Garbage, dead animals, abundant animal waste and often human waste were thrown into the streets to rot. Where sewers existed, the pipes were fragile, broke easily and leaked into low pressure drinking water supply pipes. Diet was often very limited in variety. Some seasons of the year, no fresh food was available. Hygiene consisted of a yearly bath. Poorer people lived in overcrowded and poorly ventilated homes. These conditions started changing about 1750 but persisted to a degree well into the 1900's • immunity was improved by cleaning stables. • Immunity was improved by cleaning streets. • Immunity was improved by cleaner air in better ventilated buildings. • Immunity was improved by better plumbing which kept sewer water from mixing with drinking water. • Immunity was improved by providing fresh food year around. • Immunity was improved by improved hygiene. • Immunity was improved by improved insect control. Every improvement brought about lower infectious disease incidence, lessened severity of disease symptoms and fewer deaths. By 1926 the severe form of smallpox was replaced by a much milder form with milder symptoms. This change made it very difficult to distinguish it from chicken pox which also was more severe and also killed. What caused the change from severe to more mild form of these two diseases? In the late 1960‘s smallpox outbreaks were still occurring in India with a 88% vaccination rate. The World Health Organization (WHO) finally realized vaccination was not working and in 1972 WHO began the surveillance and containment campaign where they identified people with smallpox and vaccinated immediate people around them (ring vaccination) and put them under quarantine and within 4 years outbreaks stopped and smallpox disappeared worldwide by 1977. Dr. Tom Mack, of USC who was 11.
  • 16. involved in the surveillance and containment campaign said that smallpox would of been eradicated despite the ring vaccination because the disease runs its course in 3-6 weeks and isolation would prove to be the key factor in eliminating smallpox. On June 20, 2002 at a CDC meeting Dr. Tom Mack says he has seen more cases of smallpox than anyone else has and that the death rate was between 10-15% in adults and not 30%, 40% or even higher as reported and that the data was loaded with children who died at a higher rate because of malnutrition, close living and unsanitary conditions in India and Pakistan and ―even without mass vaccination smallpox would of died out anyway. It just would have taken longer.‖ Reference: Transcript of the meeting of Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) June 19 and 20, 2002. Dr. Mack also estimated in an article in New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) that in a massive smallpox outbreak 20-30 people will die and 2,000 – 3,000 will die from the vaccine. The last known case of smallpox in the U.S was in 1948 but the government and medical community continued to vaccinate for smallpox until 1963 and resulted in an estimated 5,000 hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis and an estimated 200 to 300 deaths. The authors of the study 1959 -1968 stated that the death rate was much higher because three out of seven deaths that were definitely related to vaccination complications were not reported on the death certificate. The CDC, ACIP have no clue of why some people die from smallpox. Dr. D. A. Henderson the most well known and reputable professional said at a ACIP meeting ―It‘s a mystery; we really don‘t know.‖ Also stated, if there were a massive outbreak only 1-2% would perish from smallpox a huge difference from the projection of 30% or more. But you do not hear this in the news. Fear and ignorance drives the vaccination program. Dr. Tom Mack, USC The Karachi Health Soap Study of 2002 Shows the amazingly simple act of hand washing and bathing with soap reduces 2 Leading childhood diseases, Pneumonia and Diarrhea by 50% or More! The study was done in Karachi, Pakistan over a 51 week period. In Karachi, sewage contaminates the drinking water and feces contaminates the environment. This is what makes the study extremely powerful. Their was only a 6% drop in disease over the first 6 months of the study but by the 51st week their was; • Antibacterial soap: 47% fewer incidences of diarrhea than control group • Plain soap: 52% fewer incidences of diarrhea than control group • Antibacterial soap: 45% fewer incidences of pneumonia than control group • Plain soap: 50% fewer incidences of pneumonia than control group Plain soap out performed the antibacterial soap by 5%. Reference: http://vactruth.com/2012/12/29/simple-act-reduces-2-diseases/ What are the ingredients that go into creating vaccines? Pharmaceuticals are not required to include every ingredient on their insert because it is considered proprietary information as in the case of peanut oil used as a adjuvant. What other ingredients are not listed that are being injected into our children and us? Vaccines have not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potentials or impairment of fertility as stated in many of the vaccine inserts. 12.
  • 17. Polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) – An emulsifying agent found in Flu and HPV (Gardasil), Hep A, Rotateq (Rotavirus), Pediarix, Boostrix and in creams, soaps and multiple medical preparations, vitamin oils, and anticancer agents, in addition to common foods like ice cream. It facilitates drugs across the Blood/Brain Barrier. As far back as 1993, scientists were aware that polysorbate 80 is linked to anaphylactic shock, a sharp drop in blood pressure and hives http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16400901 and causes infertility in mammals http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8473002?dopt=Abstract Could this be one of the reasons that infertility in couples have been steadily increasing? Many other emulsifying agents. Thimerosal (Mercury) – A preservative that prevents contamination with the vials from needles repeatedly stuck in and taken out of the vial. Thimerosal is in vaccines, eye drops, and contact lens cleaning and storage solutions. It is neurotoxic(Brain), nephrotoxic(Kidney) and genotoxic (DNA). Used since 1930‘s it contains 49.6% mercury by weight. According to Dr. Boyd Haley, the nation's leading thimerosal expert, thimerosal breaks down in the body into ethylmercury and thiosalicylic acid (aspirin) and easily binds with antigenic proteins in the vaccine vial and quickly crosses the blood brain barrier and placenta barriers collecting in the brain and causing nerve damage and autoimmune disorders. It has been determined that the brain takes up 6 x‘s more mercury than the blood. Thimerosal was reduced and/or removed from many vaccines in 2001 but 25 mcg are still in multi-dose vials of Fluzone and High Dose Fluzone for 65 and older, all swine flu (H1N1), Afluria, Fluvirin, FluLaval, multidose Meningococcal ((Menomune A, C, AC and A/C/Y/W-135), TT & DT. Trace amount (< 0.3mcg) in DT (Sanofi), TD (Decavac) and DTaP(Tripedia). Updated 4/1/2013 In 1999 children received 36.34 mcg of mercury/kilogram(2.2 lbs.) with all the shots mandated by age 5. In 2006 when most thimerosal was reduced or removed from vaccination children are still receiving 33.2 mcg of mercury/Kilogram(2.2lbs.) by age 5 with the inclusion of the flu shot every year starting at 6 months of age. Only a 10% reduction of mercury. Reference: http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/2.11.pdf A study showed that children exposed to just 16 microgram of mercury in thimerosal in utero (during pregnancy) were up to 8 times more likely to receive a diagnosis of regressive autism. The study authors instead falsely reported no risk of autism associated with prenatal thimerosal exposure. Reference: Price C, et al. “Thimerosal and Autism” Technical report. Vol I. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc; 2009 Another problem with vaccination is the ―one size fits all theory‖. Dr. Boyd Haley, PhD, chairman of UK‘s chemistry department has studied thimerosal for many years. He states that ―a single vaccine given to a 6 lb. newborn is the same as giving a 180 lb. adult 30 vaccines on the same day‖. 13. Dr. Boyd Haley, PhD
  • 18. The following are from the minutes of a secret meeting that the public was never supposed to know about. On June 7-8, 2000 the CDC, FDA, NIH, WHO and five pharmaceuticals met at Simsonwood retreat to discuss the study ―Thimerosal-VSD-Study-Phase-I .‖ It is named the Simpsonwood Documents and was obtained by the freedom of information act. It discloses that infants and children who received thimerosal containing vaccines are 2 ½ x‘s more likley to develop Autism and that 12.5 mcg of thimerosal can cause ADD and ADHD plus much more. Reference: http://www.scribd.com/doc/18028414/CONFIDENTIAL-Thimerosal-VSD-Study-Phase-I READ THE STUDY Dr. Johnston, pg. 15 & 19-20 of the Simpsonwood Documents; (Chair of the meeting and a pediatrician-immunologist at the University of Colorado): “Thimerosal is cleaved (in the body) into ethylmercury and thiosalicylate which is inactive… The data on its toxicity (shows) it can cause neurologic and renal toxicity, including death.” On page 15, for example, they admit that there is very little pharmacokinetic data on ethylmercury, the form of mercury in thimerosal. “Aluminum and mercury are often simultaneously administered to infants, both at the same site and at different sites.” In fact they say there is no data on excretion, the data on toxicity is sparse, yet it is recognized to cause hypersensitivity, it can cause neurological problems and even death, and it is known to easily pass the blood-brain barrier and the placental barrier. Dr. Russell Blaylock comments; Therefore, what they are admitting is that we have a form of mercury that has been used in vaccines since the 1930s and no one has bothered to study the effects on biological systems, especially the brains of infants. Their defense throughout this conference is ―we just don‘t know the effects of ethylmercury.‖ As a solution, they resort to studies on methylmercury because there are thousands of studies on this form of mercury. The major source of this form is seafood consumption. Dr. Johnson says on page 17, of the Simpsonwood Documents, “We agree that it would be desirable to remove mercury from U.S. licensed vaccines, but we did not agree that this was a universal recommendation that we would make because of the issue concerning preservatives for delivering vaccines to other countries, particularly developing countries, in the absence of hard data that implied that there was in fact a problem.” Dr. Russell Blaylock comments; So, here you have it. The data is convincing enough that the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice, as well as the regulatory agencies and the CDC, all recommend its removal as quickly as possible because of concerns of adverse effects of mercury on brain development, but not for the children in the developing countries. I thought the whole idea of child health programs in the United States directed toward the developing world was to give poor children a better chance in an increasingly competitive world. This policy being advocated would increase the neurodevelopmental problems seen in poor children of developing countries and of this country, impairing their ability to learn and develop competitive minds. Remember, there was a representative of the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr. John Clements, serving on this panel of ―experts‖ who apparently never challenged this statement made by Dr. Johnson. Reference: R.L. Blaylock. The Truth Behind the Vaccine Cover-up. Medical Veritas; 5 (2008) 1714–1726 Reference: http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/2.6.pdf Review of Simpsonwood documents by Dr. Russell Blaylock 14.
  • 19. This is the study that was the topic of discussion at the secretive Simpsonwood meeting in 2000. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) did conduct a study, which showed that three-month-old babies exposed to just 63 micrograms of mercury were two-and-a-half times more likely to develop autism. Subsequently, the CDC did release a report to the public in 2003 in the journal Pediatrics but the findings were much different. The new study was amended with different data which lowered the autism rate. Dr. Sidney Baker has reviewed both reports. Baker has authored six medical books, and written scores of articles on childhood behavior and autism. Baker is critical of the CDC study. "I can't imagine that smart people could possibly have re-arranged the data the way they were done, and represented the data the way they were done, without doing it on purpose and with the express purpose, as you say, of a cover up," Baker said. Baker treats hundreds of autistic patients each year from around the country. He suspects that about half of the children he sees have been affected by Thimerosal from their vaccines. Baker said the CDC's refusal to release raw data from the study for outside experts to evaluate, a standard protocol in medical research, is helping to fuel the controversy. Dr. Sidney Baker Reference: http://www.scribd.com/doc/18028414/CONFIDENTIAL-Thimerosal-VSD-Study-Phase-I Read the confidential study Reference: http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/vaccine_awareness/children_mercury.html Thimerosal was reduced and/or removed from many vaccines in 2001 but 25 mcg are still in multi-dose vials of Fluzone and High Dose Fluzone for 65 and older, all swine flu (H1N1), Afluria, Fluvirin, FluLaval, multidose Meningococcal ((Menomune A, C, AC and A/C/Y/W-135), TT & DT. Trace amount (< .3mcg) in DT (Sanofi), TD (Decavac) and DTaP(Tripedia), which lists on its insert adverse reactions SIDS, Autism, Guillain-Barré syndrome, demyelinating diseases of the CNS (MS or multiple sclerosis) and encephalopathy. Reference: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf Reference: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/UCM096228#t3 The EPA states the level of mercury an adult can receive safely is 0.8mcg/day. Mercury was in ALL FLU SHOTS, ALL DPT (most DtaP) and ALL Hep B shots. Hep-B is given within 24 hours of birth, again between 1 and 2 months and again between 6 and 18 months. In 1999 the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice (ACIP) decided to remove and/or reduce thimerosal starting in 2001 but allowed the pharmaceuticals to use up stock piles subjecting millions of more infants and children to the possible adverse side effects and death associated with vaccines instead of removing all thimerosal containing vaccines from the market immediately. As a comparison I use the organic form of mercury methylmercury, as the officials used during the Simpsonwood meetimg to show the seriousness of mercury in relation to the human body. In 2004 the EPA and the FDA warned pregnant, nursing and young children to avoid fish high in mercury. The FDA safe level is <1mcg of mercury/gram of fish and the Japanese Gov. said that a safe level is <0.3 mcg/gram of fish. Prior to 2001 children received 237.5 mcg of mercury in the series of vaccination. Scientists from the EPA estimate that 600,000 babies born each year are at high risk for neurological and developmental problems because of high levels of mercury. Everywhere in the world mercury is considered a dangerous neurotoxin except when we put it in our bodies in amalgam fillings and in vaccines. The residue left in a flu vial 15.
  • 20. 16.
  • 21. is required to be handled as toxic waste by the EPA, yet it is ok to inject into humans. If the multi-dose vial is not shaken each time a shot is given (human error) the last shot left in the vial can contain much more than 25 mcg of mercury. Because salicylate (aspirin) was injected into your blood stream it has the potential to create an allergic reaction. Reference: EPA reference dose for methyl mercury. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-MEETINGS/2000/October/Day-30/m27781.htm The following are excerpts from the Material Safety Data Sheet for thimerosal, published by Eli Lilly and Company. Effective date is 22 Dec 1999. Seasonal flu vaccines are being recommended for use in pregnant women, despite the following warnings taken directly from Thimerosal Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS). Primary Physical and Health Hazards: Skin Permeable. Toxic Mutagen (causes genetic mutation). Eye Irritant. Allergen. Nervous system and reproductive effects. Caution Statement: Thimerosal may enter the body through the skin, is toxic, alters genetic material. Effects of exposure may include numbness of extremities fetal changes, decreased offspring survival and lung tissue changes. Exposure to mercury in utero may cause mild to severe mental retardation and mild to severe motor coordination impairment. Reference: http://www.vaccine-tlc.org/docs/Thimerosal%20Material%20Safety%20 Data%20Sheet.pdf Reference: Watch the 4 ½ minute video how mercury destroys brain neurons http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtFsy0rQsak Reference: video clip showing mercury vapor being released from your amalgam fillings http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ylnQ-T7oiA Adjuvant – A substance used to initiate a stronger and longer lasting immune reaction than then can be initiated alone by the attenuated pathogen. This is a fundamental flaw in vaccination. Invoking a immune response is not conferring beneficial lasting immunity that you receive from naturally acquiring the disease. 1. Aluminum – Neurotoxin, Mitochondrial Disruptor, causes Autoimmune disease. Not currently in Flu vaccines. More dangerous than mercury. Both collect in the brain and activate microglia and increase excitotoxicity in the brain causing systemic and brain inflammation. See ―What happens to the brain when you receive a vaccination‖ pg. 36? 17.
  • 22. Aluminum Phosphate, Aluminum hydroxide, Aluminum potassium phosphate, Aluminum hydroxy-phosphate sulfate. In huge amounts in many vaccines. Hib (PedVaxHib brand only) - 225 micrograms per shot. Hepatitis B - 250 micrograms per shot. DTaP - depending on the manufacturer, ranges from 170 to 625 micrograms per shot. Pneumococcus (Pc) Prevnar - 125 micrograms per shot. Hepatitis A - 250 micrograms per shot. HPV - 225 micrograms per shot. Pentacel (DTaP, HIB and Polio combo vaccine) - 330 micrograms per shot. Pediarix (DTaP, Hep B and Polio combo vaccine) - 850 micrograms per shot. Anthrax - 600 micrograms of aluminum per shot. Anything that has more than 25 mcg of aluminum is *supposed* to have a label that says: WARNING: This product contains aluminum that may be toxic. Aluminum may reach toxic levels with prolonged parenteral administration if kidney function is impaired. Premature neonates are particularly at risk because their kidneys are immature, and they require large amounts of calcium and phosphate solutions, which contain aluminum. Research indicates that patients with impaired kidney function, including premature neonates, who receive parenteral levels of aluminum at greater than 4 to 5 μg/kg/day accumulate aluminum at levels associated with central nervous system and bone toxicity. Tissue loading may occur at even lower rates of administration. Vaccines are exempt from this warning and are not required to follow the maximum dosage of 25 mcg. allowed. Reference: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=201.323 Prolong-Does birth through 18 years old qualify as prolonged exposure? I think it does! Remember, the ability to excrete aluminum is dependent on healthy, properly functioning kidneys but a neonates kidneys are not fully functional until 1-2 years after birth. Reference: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/EnforcementActivitiesbyFDA/WarningLettersandNotice ofViolationLetterstoPharmaceuticalCompanies/ucm054384.pdf On page 2 of 5 pages. The hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B) is given at birth, 2 and 6 months. Each dose contains 250mcg of aluminum. The DTaP shot (Infanrix) is given at 2, 4, 6 and 15 months. Each dose contains 625mcg of aluminum. The Hib vaccine (Pedvax) is given at 2, 4 and 12 months. Each dose contains 225mcg of aluminum. The pneumococcal vaccine (PCV/Prevnar) is given at 2, 4, 6 and 12 months. Each dose contains 125mcg of aluminum. The hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix) is given at 12 and 18 months. Each dose contains 250mcg of aluminum. Thus, babies who follow the recommended immunization schedule are injected with nearly 5000mcg (5mg!) of aluminum by 18 months of age. (Since some shot dates are variable, babies may receive up to 1,475mcg of aluminum at their 12-month or 15-month checkups!) Reference: Vaccine product inserts/CDC‘s immunization schedule. 18.
  • 23. Research indicates that patients with impaired kidney function, including premature neonates, who receive parenteral levels of aluminum at greater than 4 to 5 μg/kg/day accumulate aluminum at levels associated with central nervous system and bone toxicity. Tissue loading may occur at even lower rates of administration. Reference: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/EnforcementActivitiesbyFDA/WarningLettersandNoti ceofViolationLetterstoPharmaceuticalCompanies/ucm054384.pdf Aluminum is neurotoxic, even in minute quantities, and has a long history of well-documented hazards. In 1927, Dr. Victor Vaughn, a toxicologist with the University of Michigan, testified before the Federal Trade Commission that ―all salts of aluminum are poisonous when injected subcutaneously or intravenously.‖ According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, ―Aluminum is now being implicated as interfering with a variety of cellular and metabolic processes in the nervous system and in other tissues.‖ This has led some researchers to speculate that aluminum may be linked to autism. Some evidence appears to support this possibility. For example, in 1997 the New England Journal of Medicine published data showing that premature babies injected with aluminum build up toxic levels in the blood, bones and brain, and that aluminum toxicity can lead to neurological damage, including mental handicaps at 18 months of age. References: Zatta, P., et al. “Aluminum and health.” First International Conference on Metals and the Brain: from Neurochemistry to Neurodegeneration. University of Padova, Italy (Sep 20-23, 2000). www.bio.unipd.it/zatta/metals/document2.htm Reference: Wisniewski, HM., et al. “Aluminum neurotoxicity in mammals.” Environmental Geochemistry and Health (March 1990);12(1-2):115-20. Reference: Ayoub, D. “Aluminum, vaccines and autism: déjàvu!” National Autism Association Annual Conference.Atlanta, GA. (Nov. 11, 2007). Reference: “Aluminum toxicity in infants and children (RE9607),” Pediatrics (March 1996);97(3):413-416. Reference: Taylor, G. “It’s not just the mercury: aluminum hydroxide in vaccines.” Adventures in Autism (March 9, 2008). www.adventures inautism.blogspot.com Reference : Bishop, NJ., et al. “Aluminum neurotoxicity in preterm infants receiving intravenous-feeding solutions.” New England Journal of Medicine 1997;336(22):1557-62. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO) are aware that aluminum is dangerous. For example, in June 2000, Dr. Tom Verstraeten, CDC epidemiologist, made the following comment to a group of concerned scientists: ―The results for aluminum were almost identical to ethylmercury because the amount of aluminum in vaccines goes along almost exactly with the mercury.‖ He was referring to a landmark study that found ―statistically significant relationships‖ between both aluminum and mercury in vaccines and neurodevelopmental delays. Reference: National Autism Association. From transcripts of the meeting by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Received in an email dated June 28, 2006 19.
  • 24. Dr. John Clements, WHO vaccine advisor states ―Aluminum is not perceived, I believe, by the public as a dangerous metal. Therefore, we are in a much more comfortable wicket in terms of defending its presence in vaccines.‖ Reference: Clements, J. “Workshop on aluminum in vaccines.” Presented by National Vaccine Program Office, Department of Health and Human Services. San Juan, Puerto Rico (May 11-12, 2000). As noted in David Ayoub‘s presentation Ayoub, D. “Aluminum, vaccines and autism: déjàvu!‖ National Autism Association Annual Conference. Atlanta, GA. (Nov. 11, 2007) Babies weigh about 12 pounds (5.5kg) at two months of age when they receive 1,225mcg of aluminum from their vaccines, 50 times higher than safety levels! Using the FDA‘s 5 mcg/kg/day, we can figure out the limit that a human can receive safely at one time: 8 pound, healthy baby: 8 lb./2.204622622 lb. = 3.63 kg. x 5 mcg. = 18.14 mcg. of Alum. 15 pound, healthy baby: 15 lb./2.204622622 lb. = 6.8 kg. x 5 mcg. = 34.02 mcg. of Alum. 30 pound, healthy toddler: 30 lb./2.204622622 lb. = 13.61 kg. x 5 mcg. = 68.04 mcg. of Alum. 50 pound, healthy child: 50 lb./2.204622622 lb. = 22.68 kg. x 5 mcg. = 113.40 mcg. of Alum. 150 pound adult: 150 lb./2.204622622 lb. = 68.04 kg. X 5 mcg. = 340.19 mcg. of Alum. 350 pound adult: 350 lb./2.204622622 lb. = 158.76 kg. x 5 mcg. = 793.79 mcg. of Alum. Research indicates that patients with impaired kidney function, including premature neonates, who receive parenteral levels of aluminum at greater than 4 to 5 [micro]g/kg/day accumulate aluminum at levels associated with central nervous system and bone toxicity. Tissue loading may occur at even lower rates of administration. There is concern for a build up of aluminum in the infants body because aluminum is excreted by the kidneys and kidney filtration is low at birth and does not reach maximum filtration rate until 1-2 years of age. Aluminum is linked to Alzheimer‘s. Reference: Simmer, K. Aluminum in infancy. In: Zatta PF, Alfrey AC, (Eds) Aluminum toxicity in infants Health and Disease. 1997, World Scientific Publishing. A new Canadian study of the mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity in pediatric patients confirms that immune challenges during early development, including those vaccine-induced, can lead to permanent detrimental alterations of the brain and immune system function. Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD and Christopher A. Shaw, PhD of the University of British Columbia‘s evidence-based study was recently published in Lupus, the only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Reference: Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA. Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity in pediatric populations. Lupus. 2011;21(2):223-230 20.
  • 25. According to the FDA and the AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics), what happens if a child receives more than the maximum required dose of aluminum? • Aluminum builds up in the bones and brain and can be toxic. • Aluminum can cause neurological harm. • Aluminum overdose can be fatal in patients with weak kidney‘s or kidney disorders or in premature babies. How many children are tested to see if their kidney‘s are functioning properly before they are vaccinated? Could this also be why the Hepatitis B shot, given to infants at birth, has been linked to SIDS? Reference: http://sids-network.org/experts/poa9078.pdf Dr. Donald Miller advises the following schedule for those that insist on vaccinating 1. No vaccinations until your child is 2 years old. That means NO Hep-B. 2. No vaccines that contain thimerosal (mercury) that includes Tetanus toxoid by Sanofi Pastuer, all multi-dose flu vials, all H1N1 (swine flu shots) and meningococcal vaccines. 3. No live virus vaccines like Flumist. It sheds up to 21 days and causes the flu as demonstrated in the clinical trials. 4. The following vaccines should be given one at a time (not as a combination vaccine), every six months, beginning at age 2: a. Pertussis (acellular, not whole cell) b. Diphtheria c. Tetanus d. Polio (the Salk vaccine, cultured in human cells) Reference: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/01/27/mercury-in-vaccines-was-replaced-with-something-even-moretoxic.aspx There are several animal studies involving aluminum and/or aluminum-containing vaccines that did show neurologic harm. Not only did aluminum build up in the brain and cause damage, but some of the damage looked similar to what is seen in the brains of Alzheimer's patients. These researchers at the Department of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Neuroscience, Japan, exposed rat nerve cells to varying amounts of aluminum and found not only nerve degeneration, but the accumulation of amyloid proteins, as is seen in patients with Alzheimer's disease. The level of aluminum needed to cause this effect was 50 micromoles over a three-week period. It isn't clear how 50 micromoles compares to the microgram units used in the vaccines. Reference: . M. Kawahara et al., "Effects of Aluminum on the Neurotoxicity of Primary Cultured Neurons and on the Aggregation of Beta-Amyloid Protein," Brain Research Bulletin 55, no. 2 (15 May 2001): 211-217. 21.
  • 26. This group of doctors fed aluminum to rats for 35 days and found high levels of the metal in the brain tissue, as well as brain-tissue degeneration in a pattern similar to that found in Alzheimer's disease. Reference: S. S. El-Rhaman, "Neuropathology of Aluminum Toxicity in Rats (Glutamate and GABA Impairment)," Pharmacology 47, no. 3 (March 2003): 189-194. This British group injected aluminum-containing vaccines into mice and found that levels of the metal rose in the brain and peaked around the third day after injection. Reference: K. Redhead et al., "Aluminum-Adjuvanted Vaccines Transiently Increase Aluminum Levels in Murine Brain Tissue," Pharmacology & Toxicology 70, no. 4 (April 1992): 278-280. Aluminum compounds, added to vaccines to augment their immunogenicity, have been shown to synergistically potentiate Thimerosal's neurotoxicity. In other words the damage that mercury or aluminum does to the nervous system individually is multiplied 10X‘s -100 X‘s when mercury in [Tetanus toxoid, Flu vaccine, H1N1 (swine flu shots), and meningococcal vaccines] is combined with aluminum in (Hib (PedVaxHib brand only), Hepatitis B, DTaP, Pneumococcus (Pc) Prevnar, Hepatitis A, HPV, Pentacel (DTaP, HIB and Polio combo vaccine), Pediarix (DTaP, Hep B and Polio combo vaccine) and Anthrax]. Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2957583/ You may hear the pro vaccinators argue that aluminum is everywhere in our food, water, land, breast milk etc. and this is true. This is one reason why we need to be especially cautious about vaccines and not add more aluminum in our bodies. When we ingest aluminum, our body is able to expel aluminum through the kidneys. There are three exceptions to this rule: 1. The very young up until two years have undeveloped kidneys and are not able to excrete aluminum and 2. As we get older the kidneys do not function as well so the elderly may have trouble excreting aluminum. 3. People with a disease or partially functioning kidney(s) There is a completely different mechanism at work to try and rid the body of aluminum that is injected with vaccines and the aluminum tends to build up in the brain tissues just as thimerosal (mercury) does causing neurological and autoimmune problems. 22.
  • 27. In 1983 there was 1:10,000 with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD). In 2013 the CDC announced there are 1:50 with ASD and 1:5 with ADD or ADHD. The most obvious change that correlates with this epidemic of ASD, ADD, ADHD, child cancers, allergies and diabetes is the dramatic increase of the number of vaccines given in a much shorter time span along with the mercury (preservative), now removed from most vaccines, aluminum (adjuvant), formaldehyde (carcinogen) linked to leukemia and brain cancers, polysorbate 80 that causes infertility and many other chemicals. It is true that in 1983 the DSM did not recognize PDDNOS or Asperger's syndrome, and the criteria for autistic disorder (ASD) were more restrictive. This still does not explain the epidemic of ASD from 1:10,000 in 1983 to 1:50 in 2013 and it is not genetic! Reference: 1983 Vaccine Schedule http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/images/schedule1983s.jpg Reference: 2012 vaccine Schedule http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6105a5.htm http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/images/schedule1983s.jpg 23. The number of vaccines a child would of received by the age of 6 in 1950 was 7, in 1974, 13 vaccinations, in 1983, 10 vaccinations (measels, mumps and rubella were combined in one injection), in 2012, 36 (If MMR &DTaP are counted as one shot) vaccinations and 68 vaccinations by age 18 including the prenatal flu shot that causes a 4,250% increase in fetal death during 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters Reference: http://vactruth.com/2012/11/23/flushot-spikes-fetal-death and this government document supporting the increased death rate http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ ?term=comparison+of+vaers+fetalloss+reports+during+three+consecutiv e+influenza+seasons 2012 Vaccine Schedule birth to 18
  • 28. 2013 Vaccine schedule (vaccines from age 6-18 are not included) Aluminum 2013 Prenatal 1 Influenza (IIV) - inactivated influenza vaccine 2013 Birth Hepatitis B (HepB) 250 mcg 2013 2 Months 7 Diphtheria, Tetanus, a. Pertussis (DTaP) 170-625 mcg Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) 225 mcg 200 mcg Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) Pneumococcal conjugate Vaccine (PCV) Rotavirus (RV) 2013 4 Month 8 15 mcg Hepatitis B (HepB) 250 mcg 100 mcg Diphtheria, Tetanus, a. Pertussis (DTaP) 170-625 mcg Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) 225 mcg 200 mcg Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) Pneumococcal conjugate Vaccine (PCV) Rotavirus (RV) 2013 6 Months 9 15 mcg Hepatitis B (HepB) 225 mcg 100 mcg Diphtheria, Tetanus, a. Pertussis (DTaP) All tetanus boosters contain formaldehyde Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) 225 mcg 200 mcg Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) 995 mcg (.995 mg) of formaldehyde by Pneumococcal conjugate Vaccine (PCV) 6 months of age Rotavirus (RV) 25 mcg Influenza (IIV) 2013 12 Months 7 Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) 225 mcg 100 mcg Hepatitis A (Hep A) 250 mcg Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Pneumococcal conjugate Vaccine (PCV) Varicella (VAR) 2013 15 Months 3 100 mcg Diphtheria, Tetanus, a.Pertussis (DTaP) 170-625 mcg 2013 18 Months 2 100 mcg Hepatitis A (Hep A) 250 mcg 25 mcg Influenza (IIV) 2013 30 Months 1 25 mcg Influenza (IIV) 2013 42 Months 1 25 mcg Influenza (IIV) 2013 48 Months 8 100 mcg Diphtheria, Tetanus, a. Pertussis (DTaP) 170-625 mcg 200 mcg Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Varicella (VAR) 2013 54 Months 1 25 mcg Influenza (IIV) 2013 66 Months 1 25 mcg ___Influenza (IIV) _________________________ Vaccines for 2013 if include Prenatal Flu 49 1,720 mcg (1.720 mg) of formaldehyde Totals 2,805 - 4,625 mcg of aluminum Reference: Reference: Reference: Reference: formaldehyde 25 mcg 15 mcg 100 mcg Mercury (thimerosal) 25 mcg only in Multi-Dose vials of Fluzone and High Dose Fluzone(for 65 and older), Swine Flu, Afluria, Fluvirin, FluLaval, Meningococcal (Menomune A, C, AC and A/C/Y/W-135), TT & DT. Trace amount (< 0.3mcg) in DT (Sanofi) and DTaP (Tripedia), TD (Decavac) Was in ALL Flu shots, DPT (most Dtap) and HepB Shots as admitted in the Simpsonwood Documents. until 2001 when the pharmaceuticals started to remove or reduce thimerosal but kept it on the the market until remaining stockpiles were used up. 25 mcg ( 2 shots of 12.5 mcg) 25 mcg (2 shots of 12.5 mcg) 25 mcg (2 shots of 12.5 mcg) 25 mcg (adult shot) 25 mcg (adult shot) 25 mcg_(adult shot) 175 mcg (.175 mg)of mercury http://tenpennyimc.com/2013/01/29/formaldehyde-in-vaccines/ http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/UCM096228#t3 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6132a3.htm 24. Accurate as of 4/2013
  • 29. **From 1999 through 2002, several mercury-laced vaccines were phased out of the recommended immunization schedule. They were replaced with low-mercury, or ―thimerosal-free,‖ vaccines. However, during this so-called ―phaseout‖ period, four doses of a new vaccine containing high aluminum content were added to the childhood immunization schedule (for pneumococcal disease). Two doses of another aluminum-containing vaccine (for Hib) were added in 2005—a 20% increase in aluminum content since the mercury phase out.** What about the Vaccine Schedule for an Adult? In 2008 the vaccine industry figured out how to double the vaccination rate and introduced the adult vaccine schedule. The U.S. is the only nation in the world that has a vaccine schedule for an adult. The average life expectancy for an adult in 2013 is 79 (men and women averaged together). Reference: http://www.data360.org/dsg.aspx?Data_Set_Group_Id=195 The number of vaccine you will receive if you follow the CDC recommended schedule and if you live from 18 until 79 is: • • • • • • • • • • 6 DPT injection which are actually 18 individual vaccines 3 HPV injection for women ( Human Papilloma Virus) and 6 HPV shots for men 1-2 MMR injection (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) which is actually 3-6 individual vaccines 2 Varicella injection (chicken Pox) 61 Influenza injections 2-4 Pneumococcal injections 1 or more Meningococcal injections 2 Hepatitis-A injections 3 Hepatitis-B injections Cause Liver Damage as you will learn 1 Zoster injection (Shingles) which you will learn that the chicken pox vaccination is causing shingles so there solution is another vaccine. As you read below a weak immune system can reactivate the virus later in life. Vaccines weaken the immune system . Living a healthy lifestyle strengthens the immune system. You would be more than crazy and frankly stupid to even think about this schedule as every adverse effect and every vaccine ingredient you will learn about will be more than doubled. Reference: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-schedule-easy-read.pdf 25.
  • 30. Anyone who has had even a mild case of chickenpox can get shingles. People who have a weak immune system are vulnerable to reactivation of the virus that causes shingles. Many things can weaken your immune system, including: • • • Being age 50 or older. Recent surgery. Medicines. These include medicines used to kill cancer cells (chemotherapy) and medicines that reduce the effects of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), such as infliximab and etanercept. • Radiation therapy. • Serious illness or disease, such as cancer or AIDS. • Poor nutrition. • Stress. • Chronic diseases that suppress the immune system, such as diabetes, lupus, or HIV. • Injury. • Organ transplant. Reference: http://www.webmd.com/skin-problems-and-treatments/shingles/shingles-cause 2. Squalene - An oil based adjuvant that is used in the anthrax vaccine but not currently approved in the US. Squalene is being used in experiments on humans by the US government and may be used in the near future in vaccines and with a new technology called nanopatch. Nanopatch is a microneedle patch with the vaccine in many tiny needles. The nanopatch does not have to be kept refrigerated and the Government is planning to send the nanopatch by the U.S Postal Service so you can conveniently apply the tiny patch and wreak havoc on your health, immune system, brain and nervous system. I found one flu vaccine used in a microneedle trials that did contain Squalene at Comparison of 4 Influenza Vaccines in Seniors Condition: Influenza Vaccine Interventions: Biological: Agriflu; Biological: Fluad; Biological: Intanza; Biological: Vaxigrip This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants. Sponsor: University of British Columbia Collaborator: PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network Information provided by (Responsible Party): University of British Columbia Estimated Enrollment: 930 Study Start Date: July 2011 Estimated Study Completion Date: April 2012 Primary Completion Date: December 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) 26.
  • 31. Arms Assigned Interventions Active Comparator: Trivalent Influenza vaccine subunit The seasonal vaccine (Agriflu, Novartis) contains egg-derived, inactivated and detergent split versions of the 3 influenza strains (tri-valent). It is given into the muscle of the upper arm at a dose of 0.5 mL. Biological: Agriflu 0.5mL dose IM vaccination Active Comparator: Adjuvanted Tri-valent Influenza Vaccine The adjuvanted vaccine (Fluad, Novartis) is made with an immunestimulator (MF59) that contains squalene oil microdroplets and two surfactants, Tween 80 and Span 65. It is given into the muscle of the upper arm at a dose of 0.5 mL. Biological: Fluad 0.5mL dose of vaccine given IM Active Comparator: Intradermal Tri-valent Influenza vaccine (Intanza 15ug, Sanofi Pasteur) is an inactivated, split-virion influenza vaccine. Strains are grown in fertilized hen's eggs, inactivated with formalin and split using Triton X-100 detergent, as for TIV. The syringe is attached to a micro-needle injection system (Beckton Dickinson) that limits the depth of injection to just under the skin. It is given into the skin over the upper arm at a dose of 0.1 mL. Biological: Intanza 0.5mL dose vaccine given IM Active Comparator: Trivalent Split-virion Influenza vaccine Vaxigrip, Sanofi Pasteur is an inactivated, split-virion Influenza vaccine. The 3 influenza strains are grown on fertilized eggs, concentrated, purified in a sugar-like solution, detergent split, and inactivated by formaldehyde, then diluted in phosphate buffered salt solution. A dose of 0.5 mL is given into the muscle of the arm. Biological: Vaxigrip 0.5mL dose vaccine given IM Reference: The link clinical http://clinicaltrials.gov/ is a government link where you can look up any drug or vaccine and look at the experimental trials that is occurring in the US and the world at any time on the top of the home page. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01368796?term=microneedle&rank=25 Novartis has built a factory in North Carolina and it will produce vaccines using dog kidney cells and will produce squalene (MF59). Found in olives, eggs other foods and topical products. It is a precursor to cholesterol and hormones and is on most cell surfaces especially the nervous system. When injected, antibodies are produced for Squalene and this can lead to attacking the Squalene naturally found in the body causing serious autoimmune and nervous system diseases. There was only one study with a very small population done before it was approved. Over 2 dozen peer reviewed studies from Australia, Asia, U.S. and Europe have shown that autoimmune disease occurred in animals after being injected. 10 ppb=184 trillion molecules of Squalene and a possible devastating autoimmune response. After 75 years the mechanism for action and the long term effects of adjuvants are ―incompletely understood‖. 3. AS03 - Made by GSK. Consists of Squalene (10.69 mg), alpha tocopherol (11.86 mg) and Polysorbate 80 (4.86mg). Used in Canada and Europe in swine Flu. Linked to severe narcolepsy, Guillain-Barre syndrome in Scandinavia, Ireland and other countries. 4. MF-59 - Made by Norvartis. Consists of Squalene (10mg), Span 85 (detergent) and polysorbate 80. Used in Europe 27.
  • 32. 5. Other adjuvants - Marcol 82, Mineral oil, Montanide 80 (Oil based), Polyoxidonium (Polymer) Formaldehyde - Immunotoxin. In the Flu shot and many other vaccines. Used to inactivate the virus. The U.S. EPA has declared formaldehyde a carcinogen and is used as embalming fluid. It causes cancer! It is a potent neurological toxin that can cause many problems including Alzheimer‘s. EPA allows 0.016 ppm in the air in new buildings. We start smelling formaldehyde at 3 ppm. NIOSH stated that ―Formaldehyde is immediately dangerous to health and life at 20 ppm‖ yet there is anywhere from 50-200 ppm in a flu shot. It also causes proteins to irreversibly bind to DNA. There is no known safe level of formaldehyde that can be safely injected in your body. More hazardous than most chemicals in 5 out of 12 ranking systems, on at least 8 federal regulatory lists, it is ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds (worst 10%) to ecosystems and human health (Environmental Defense Fund). FORMALDEHYDE LINKED TO CHILDHOOD CANCER From the CDC website: ―Formaldehyde is used to inactivate bacterial products for toxoid vaccines, (these are vaccines that use an inactive bacterial toxin to produce immunity.) It is also used to kill unwanted viruses and bacteria that might contaminate the vaccine during production. Most formaldehyde is removed from the vaccine before it is packaged.‖ Reference: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm An example of double talk on the CDC‘s Vaccine excipient and media summary ―This table includes not only vaccine ingredients (e.g., adjuvants and preservatives), but also substances used during the manufacturing process, including vaccine-production media, that are removed from the final product and present only in trace quantities.‖ Is it removed or is it still present in trace quantities? Reference: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf From the EPA website: (1) no evidence: either there were no reports that met our criteria for evidence, or there were reports which showed no developmental neurotoxicity; (2) minimal evidence: one report only or multiple reports from only one laboratory; or (3) substantial evidence: reports from more than one laboratory. The chemicals in the latter group will be especially useful for vetting protocols that have been proposed as screens for developmental neurotoxicity 28.
  • 33. ―Chemicals with Minimal Evidence of Developmental Neurotoxicity (n≈100)‖ ―Formaldehyde is on the list of Minimal Evidence Neurotoxins.‖ Reference: http://www.epa.gov/ncct/toxcast/files/summit/48P%20Mundy%20TDAS.pdf From the National Cancer institute website: • ―Research studies of workers exposed to formaldehyde have suggested an association between formaldehyde exposure and several cancers, including nasopharyngeal cancer and leukemia.‖ • ―In 1987, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classified formaldehyde as a probable human carcinogen under conditions of unusually high or prolonged exposure. Since that time, some studies of humans have suggested that formaldehyde exposure is associated with certain types of cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies formaldehyde as a human carcinogen. In 2011, the National Toxicology Program, an interagency program of the Department of Health and Human Services, named formaldehyde as a known human carcinogen in its 12th Report on Carcinogens.‖ FROM BIRTH THROUGH LIFE IF YOU FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDED SCHEDULE YOU WILL HAVE LONG TERM EXPOSURE. GO BACK TO THE CHART ON PAGE 24 to see how much formaldehyde is being injected into you and your child. Reference: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/formaldehyde From Cancer.org website: What are the most common types of childhood cancers? The types of cancers that occur most often in children are different from those seen in adults. MAYBE BECAUSE OF THE VOLUME OF VACCINES A CHILD RECEIVES? The most common cancers of children are: Leukemia - 34% of all cancers in children Brain and other nervous system tumors - 27% of childhood cancers Neuroblastoma Wilms tumor Lymphoma Rhabdomyosarcoma Retinoblastoma Bone cancer (including osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma) Other types of cancers are rare in children, but they do happen sometimes. In very rare cases, children may even develop cancers that are much more common in adults. Reference: http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancerinchildren/detailedguide/cancer-in-children-types-of-childhood-cancers 29.
  • 34. Ethylene Glycol – Antifreeze Attenuated Pathogens – weakened half-killed organism when treated with chemicals. There is no way to measure or confirm that these viruses are actually weakened enough so that it does not cause disease. The CDC‘s excuse is if you come down with the flu than you must of already had it in your body before you received the flu shot. Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) - can cause a wide variety of health problems including, migraines, nausea, drowsiness, heart palpitation, hair loss, asthma, and rapidly increasing diabetes. Toxoid – Poisonous excretion of a pathogen that is suppose to trigger immunity because it came from the original microorganism. Preservatives : 1. Glutaraldehyde - a toxic chemical used for cold sterilization of medical and dental equipment. No OSHA permissible exposure limit. NIOSHA‘s permissible limit is 0.2 ppm (parts per million). 2. Other Preservatives – Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid(EDTA), Disodium edentate (EDTA), mercurius, solubilis. Excipient – Inactive substance used to prolong and enhance the immune effect and contain intact proteins that cause many allergic reactions up to and including anaphylaxis. Too many to list. Fillers : 1. Gelatin – In Flu shot and many other vaccines. Used as stabilizer to keep the antigens apart. Bovine-derived that has been shown to cause severe allergic reactions, cross reactions to gelatin containing food and seizures. 2. Latex – In most vaccines. From stoppers on vaccine vial and is in virtually every vial and can cause allergic reaction in a patient allergic to latex. There are a safer non allergenic substitutes that are available such as a synthetic pharmaceutical grade butyl rubber available since the 1940‘s and a halogenated synthetic rubber called gray butyl rubber since the 1960‘s but as of 2010 half of the vaccine vials are still using latex stoppers. Some stoppers can react with thimerosal and create a whole new chemical that is being injected into the patient. 3. Polygeline – a blood expander that can cause shock 4. Other Fillers – Glycerine, Xanthan gum, Sodium taurodeoxycholate. Alpha-tocopherol succinate (Vit. E) – In flu shot. A preservative and can be used in place of thimerosal. Acts as a immune modulator and increases cytokine response and antibody production especially in the elderly. 30.
  • 35. Antibiotics – In Flu shot. Gentamicin. Other antibiotics are in other vaccines. Triton X-100 (Octoxynol 10) -In flu shot. Detergent used in paints and chemicals known to cause mitochondrial disruption Alters metabolic activity, damages cell membrane and causes a rapid decline in cell function. Used to separates the H and N antigens in the viruses. The government and medical community is now labeling Autism and neurodegenerative diseases as a mitochondrial disorder. Sodium Deoxycholate (DC) – In flue shot and several others. Detergent stronger than Triton X-100. Known to promote colon cancer in human cells, promote breast cancer tumors and metastasis (spreading) of breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. Sodium Deoxycholate is a water soluble ionic detergent/bile salt which causes cell death and symptoms such as burning, redness, and swelling. It has been shown to weaken the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) and subsequently activate seizures. It has demonstrated synergistic toxicity with antifungal drugs. Detergents and emulsifiers promote tumors and cause cells to leak or explode by weakening their walls, with no mechanism for regulating destructive activity. These chemicals are not completely purified out of the final vaccine product, so they enter the body at the time of injection. Detergents are used extensively in cell research precisely because of their ability to break cells open for further analysis. This catastrophically mimics the membrane attack complex (MAC). Detergents hit cells at random and continue destroying cells regardless of which call off the attack. Sodium Deoxycholate is completely foreign to the relationships that define and make up the delicate balance of the immune system. It systematically disrupts these relationships to negate the optimal function and design of immune responses. Reagents - substance or compound that is added to a system in order to bring about a chemical reaction, or added to see if a reaction occurs. Medication – Hydrogen succinate and Hydrocortisone are in flu shots. Culture medium - This is what the disease organism is grown on. All flu viruses need a living cell to replicate (egg, dog kidney, monkey kidney, aborted fetus tissue, insect cell) and is put into a large 25,000 Liter vat with amino acids, sugars and anything else needed for the virus to successfully replicate. 1. Diploid cells – Aborted fetus tissue cells 2. Eggs – used to culture several vaccines including the flu shot. In 2011 the CDC is saying it is safe to inject anyone with egg allergies with this vaccine instead of erroring on the side of caution. What happened to the oath of First Do No Harm? 3. Cell Lines options for creating the Flu vaccines and other vaccines – Pharmaceuticals are moving to cell lines for quicker production of vaccines and to save on the time, expense and labor needed in egg replication. A. VERO Cells – Developed from kidney cells of African Green Monkeys and contained the SV 40 virus that causes cancer in humans decades later. The monkey kidney cells were used in the polio vaccine. A new cell line was created from the monkey kidney cells called PerFluCell line to produce the flu vaccine in Europe by Baxter pharmaceutical. 31.
  • 36. B. FluBlok – Made from caterpillar eggs. The antigen from the influenza virus is inserted into the insect cell for replication and than harvested. PROBLEM! As the virus is replicating in any of these cell lines it is able to pick up DNA from any of these cell lines and can transfer the DNA to humans by the vaccine. C. MDCK cells – Created from dog kidney cells in 1959. D. PER.C6 Cells - Created from aborted fetus retina cell by Cruccell. Adeno virus was added to the retina cell so that it replicates indefinitely and are by definition are called neoplastic(cancer causing) or oncogenic cells by researchers because they cause cancer when injected in experimental animals. Peanut Oil – An excipient. Not labeled as an ingredient on the package insert since 1973 because of a study that brought attention to it. It is the major cause of the peanut allergy epidemic because the peanut excipient still contains peanut proteins in it as explained in technical report #595. Microbiologist, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, is responsible for creating over 40 vaccines and was the lead vaccine researcher at Merck who discovered that peanut proteins were still intact in the vaccines and this is why vaccines are ordered to be given intramuscularly so that there is less of a chance that the proteins will get into the blood stream and cause an allergic reaction. First used in penicillin in the 1940‘s to extend the penicillin activity from 2 hours to 48 hours and by 1953 12% of the population were allergic to penicillin because of the peanut oil. Merck introduced the excipient peanut oil into vaccines in 1964 and promised it would extend immunity to polio, influenza and other diseases and became commonplace in the 1970‘s and 1980‘s. Peanut allergies exploded as an epidemic in the 1990‘s because of the doubling of vaccines from 1980‘s to 1990‘s. 1980 – 20 vaccines, 1995 – 40 vaccines, 2011 – 68 vaccines and 36 vaccines by the age of 66 months. Peanut allergy has emerged as the #1 cause of death from food reactions, being in a category of allergens able to cause anaphylaxis. This condition brings the risk of asthma attack, shock, respiratory failure, and even death primarily among children. Reference: Technical Report #595, Immunological Adjuvants, World Health Org. 1976 Reference: Fraser, Heather, The History of the Peanut Allergy, First Published in Canada by Espresso Book Machine, McMaster University Innovative Press, Hamilton, Ontario, 2010. Reference: Jones, SW. Peanut oil used in new vaccine; product patented for Merck said to extend immunity, New York Times, BusinessFinancial Section, Sept. 19, 1964. 32.
  • 37. Following is a summary of several articles by Dr. Russell Blaylock Board certified neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock has practiced neurosurgery since 1990 and runs a successful nutritional practice. He is author of Excitotoxins: the taste that kills, demonstrated the link between food additives and degenerative diseases. He has contributed to medical textbooks and written and illustrated booklets on multiple sclerosis (MS) and bioterrorism. Dr. Blaylock serves on the editorial staff of the ―Journal of the American Nutraceutical Association‖ and on the editorial board of the ―Medical Sentinel‖, official journal of the ―Association of American Physicians and Surgeons‖. He is now a fulltime researcher who examines the medical literature in detail and exposes the vaccine cover ups using Government agency documents from the CDC, National Institute of Health (NIH) & National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and the highest regarded Journals like Science, Nature and New England Journal of Medicine The danger of vaccination The intent of a vaccination is to help you build immunity to potentially harmful organisms that cause illness and disease. However, your body's immune system is already designed to do this in response to organisms which invade your body naturally. Your three main defense mechanisms are your skin, the respiratory system and the digestive system. Most disease-causing organisms enter your body through the mucous membranes of your nose, mouth, pulmonary system or your digestive tract, not through an injection. These mucous membranes have their own immune system, called the IgA immune system. It is a different system from the one activated when a vaccine is injected into your body. Your IgA immune system is your body's first line of defense. Its job is to fight off invading organisms at their entry points, reducing or even eliminating the need for activation of your body's immune system. When a virus is injected into your body in a vaccine, and especially when combined with an immune adjuvant like squalene, your IgA immune system is bypassed and your body's Dr. Russell Blaylock immune system kicks into high gear in response to the vaccination. Injecting organisms into your body to provoke Renowned immunity is contrary to nature, and vaccination carries enormous potential to do serious damage to your health. Neurosurgeon and researcher The Blood Brain Barrier A baby and child‘s brain is susceptible to neurotoxins (harmful molecules that kill brain cells). 1. The blood brain barrier is not fully formed until maturity. 2. Even in adults there are certain areas of the brain that have no blood brain barrier. i.e. Posterior Pituitary. 3. If you have a high level of these neurotoxins they eventually cross the blood brain barrier. 4. Conditions and diseases open up the blood brain barrier: Strokes, Head injury, Hypertension, Diabetes, Brain Surgery, Heat Stroke, High Fevers, Certain Drugs, Multiple Sclerosis, Severe Hypoglycemia, Irradiation, Infections. 33.
  • 38. • If a cell is damaged too much the cell will kill itself (apoptosis). A short list of neurotoxins that kill existing brain cells and prevent myelin and brain interconnections from forming: • • • • Aluminum – In many vaccines! Mercury – In some vaccines! Formaldehyde – In many vaccines! Aspartame (Nutrasweet, Equal & Spoonful) - When the temperature of this sweetener exceeds 86 degrees F, the wood alcohol in ASPARTAME converts to formaldehyde and then to formic acid, which in turn causes metabolic acidosis. Formic acid is the poison found in the sting of fire ants. The methanol toxicity mimics, among other conditions, multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus. • Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) – The Law states companies only have to list MSG if it is 99% pure. If the product contains 98% pure MSG they can label it with a different name but it is still MSG. In some vaccines! In regards to MSG: • Humans are 5 x‘s more sensitive than a mouse • Humans are 10 x‘s more sensitive than a Rhesus Monkey • Newborns are 4X‘s more sensitive than an adult. • If you are pregnant and are eating MSG this crosses the placenta and damages the babies brain. • Glutamate interferes with uptake of glucose, one of two fuels used by the brain. The other fuel that can be used is medium chain triglycerides (MCT) found in coconut oil. The liver converts the MCT‘s into keytones. Vaccines that contain Glutamate and/or Gelatin or Hydrolyzed Gelatin (11% glutamate by weight) are, Influenza (FluMist), MMR (MMR-II), MMRV (ProQuad), Varicella (Varivax) for chicken Pox and Zoster (Shingles –Zostavax). Natural glutamate in plants and animals is known as L-glutamic acid. The breakdown of MSG typically consists of 78% glutamate, 12% sodium, and about 10% water. Any glutamate added to a processed food is not and can not be considered naturally occurring. In contrast, processed free glutamic acid (MSG) as found in processed foods and vaccines contains both L-glutamic acid and D-glutamic acid, and is also accompanied by pyroglutamic acid and other impurities. The impurities differ according to the starting materials and methods used to produce the glutamic acid (MSG). It is only acid hydrolyzed proteins that contain mono and dichloropropanols (which are carcinogenic), and it is only reaction flavors that contain heterocyclic amines (which are also carcinogenic). Proponents that say MSG in vaccines and processed foods are safe try to rationalize the argument by stating there is much more MSG in natural foods than in vaccines. While this may be true to some degree, the naturally occurring MSG is different for two reasons: 34.
  • 39. 1. The chemical composition of processed MSG is completely different as in both the vaccines and processed foods. 2. The way the body processes MSG because it is ingested (natural) and not injected(unnatural) as in the case of vaccines. Proponents of MSG state that: • 1/2 cup of peas contains 48 times the glutamate in Varivax and 127 times the amount in FluMist • One cup of breast milk contains 352 times the amount found in Varivax and 936 times the amount in FluMist • The safe, daily intake of glutamate is 12,000 times the MSG in Varivax and 32,000 times what is in FluMist It is now essentially unregulated when it comes to labeling standards. A label may say ―yeast extract―, ―calcium caseinate‖, or ―beef flavoring‖, but the product still contains varying amounts of ―free‖ glutamic acid. This makes it very difficult for consumers who are trying to avoid it. It is also very dangerous for those who suffer severe reactions to it. Many people who are very sensitive to MSG experience respiratory, neurological, muscular, skin, urological and even cardiac problems. Some of the common ingredients which contain MSG are: Plant Protein, Hydrolyzed Corn Gluten, Hydrolyzed Pea Protein, Textured Protein, Autolyzed Yeast Extract, Autolyzed Plant Protein, Yeast Extract, Calcium Caseinate, Sodium Caseinate, Gelatin, Disodium Guanylate, Disodium Inosinate, Carrageenan, Xanthum Gum, Maltodextrin, Natural Flavor, Barley Malt, Malt Extract, Soy Protein Isolate, Ultra-pasteurized Soy Sauce, Whey Protein Concentrate, Soy Protein Concentrate, Whey Protein Isolate, Protease Enzymes, Protein Fortified anything, Enzyme Modified anything and Citric Acid. http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/04/24/hydrolyzed-autolyzed-and-other-msg-containing-ingredients-in-foods-and-vaccines-kick-startschizophrenia/ 35.
  • 40. • MSG is labeled as Hydrolyzed Vegetable proteins (most common name used in processed foods). E number is the code used in Europe for labeling. Reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7arAcj-ZP6U Neurosurgeon, Dr. Russell Blaylock speaks on Excitotoxins. MUST WATCH! 67 minutes Reference: http://www.truthinlabeling.org/hiddensources.html 36.
  • 41. What happens to the brain when you receive a vaccination? It was thought for a long time that the blood brain barrier protected the brain from drugs and vaccines. The brain has a unique immune system which uses a cell called the microglia that are dispersed in the brain laying dormant, waiting to be activated, in this case by vaccines. They are easily activated by many stimuli. Numerous studies have shown that when the bodies immune system is activated the brains immune system is also activated. The more intense the bodies immune system is activated the more intense the brains immune system is activated. Once activated the microglia move around the nervous system dumping out large amounts of free radicals to try and kill the invading organism(s). Free radicals, basically, are very reactive particles that bounce all around the cell damaging everything they touch. Most originate during the process of metabolism but can also arise from toxin exposure, irradiation and toxic metals. Because they are so destructive, cells have a network of defenses designed to neutralize them. This antioxidant network is composed of numerous components that include vitamins, minerals and special chemicals called thiols (glutathione and alpha-lipoic acid). The problem is there is no invading organism. The brain has been tricked by the vaccine into believing there are invading organisms. The microglia also secrete two other chemicals called excitotoxins named glutamate and quinolinic acid, that are destructive to the brain cells and their connections and further increase the amount of free radicals being dumped in the brain. During natural aquisition of a bacterial or viral infections the excitotoxins are raised to dangerous levels. High quinolinic acid is thought to be the reason why HIV infected patients develop dementia. Current vaccination schedules of so many vaccines given so close together keeps the brain immune system constantly activated and will be flooded with excitotoxins and immune cytokines that trigger inflammation as demonstrated by numerous studies. Various cytokines have been used to treat certain cancers and other common diseases. Effects of Cytokines - Confusion - Low-grade fevers - Irritability - Combativeness - Difficulty concentrating - Language difficulties - Seizures - Disorientation - A host of other behavioral problems - Mood alterations - Memory problems - Somnolence (state of drowsiness or sleepiness) Over activation of the child‘s brain immune system damages limbic structures (area of brain that regulates emotion and memory) and amygdala structures of the brain. The amygdala is important for making associations across stimulus modalities (a certain fragrance often elicits an associated visual image). It appears to be responsible for the influence of emotional states on sensory inputs. This produces a spectrum of sensory perceptions from apparently identical stimuli (ex. the sound of one's own motorcycle is never perceived as noise). Thought to be responsible for face recognition. What is lost is that which makes us social human beings, able to function in a complex world of ideas and interactions. 37.
  • 42. The end result is a vicious cycle of immune activation by vaccines and/or organisms contaminating the vaccine, excitotoxin and cytokine excretion, and free radical production that can produce brain inflammation for up to two years after the last vaccine injection. Studies on autistic spectrum disorders and autism has shown high levels of both excitotoxins and immune cytokines, Normally the bodies immune system and the brains immune system starts up quickly and shuts down quickly to try and minimize collateral damage. Vaccination will not let the brain shut down and causes language problems, behavioral dysfunction and even dementia in the young developing brain. In adults it causes Gulf War Syndrome or one of the more common neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson‘s disease, Alzheimer‘s, Dementia or Lou Gehrig‘s disease (ALS). According to Hugh Fudenberg, MD, the world's leading immunogeneticist and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (nearly 850 papers in peer review journals): ―If an individual has had 5 consecutive flu shots between 1970 and 1980 (the years studied) his/her chances of getting Alzheimer's Disease is 10 times higher than if he/she had one, 2 or no shots. The gradual mercury and aluminum buildup in the brain causes cognitive dysfunction.‖ Reference: Transcribed notes of Dr. Fudenberg's speech at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference, Arlington, VA September, 1997. Quoted with permission. Reference: To read about Dr. Hughs 862 studies, awards, education, career high liights. http://www.nitrf.org/ and click credentials NOTE: In November 1995, South Carolina medical board found Fudenberg "guilty of engaging in dishonorable, unethical, or unprofessional conduct," for prescribing drugs to a person he did not have a bona fide physician/patient relationship with and for prescribing and treating himself with medications outside of a bona fide physician-patient relationship and was forced to surrender his license that allows him to subscribe controlled substances (Narcotics) and pay $10,000 in fines. In March 1996 he resumed practice without being allowed to prescribe any drugs. His licensed expired in January of 2004 and was denied reinstatement in March of 2004 after the South Carolina Board considered a neuropsychatric report issued in 2003 and discovered Dr. Fudenberg had a medical condition of chronic fatigue immune dysregulation syndrome (CFIDS) which, at times, physically impairs the Respondent such that he is unable to practice medicine. Dr. Fudenberg retired. In know way does this detract from his many years of peer reviewed research and accomplishments. 38.
  • 43. Two problems with using an attenuated (live, weakened) virus We now know that these live, weakened viruses can escape the immune system and take up residence in the brain and different organs in the body and can mutate. 1. Autopsies of elderly revealed that 20% had the live vaccine measles strain in their brain and 45% of there other organs had the live vaccine measles strain. 2. Many organs had different mutations of the live vaccine measles virus. This mutation is brought on by the large volume of free radicals produced by activating the brains immune system. Dr. Russell Blaylock states ―Both mercury and aluminum have been shown to activate microglia and increase excitotoxicity in the brain. In fact, we know that aluminum is a significant neurotoxin and that it shares many common mechanisms with mercury as a neurotoxin. For example, they are both toxic to neuronal neurotubules, interfere with antioxidant enzymes, poison DNA repair enzymes, interfere with mitochondrial energy production, block the glutamate reuptake proteins (GLT-1 and GLAST), bind to DNA, and interfere with neuronal membrane function. Toxins that share toxic mechanisms are almost always additive and frequently synergistic in their toxicity. It is important to appreciate that mercury is a fat soluble metal. That is, it is stored in the body's fat. The brain contains 60% fat and therefore is a common site for mercury storage.‖ Studies on Alzheimers patients have revealed that a large percentage have the live viruses in their brain compared to normal individuals. Free radicals increase with aging, exercise, stress and illness and can cause the virus to mutate into a virulent lethal disease causing organism. Reference: Journal of the American Nutriceutical Association (volume 6 [fall], Number 4, 2003, pp 21-35) http://www.russellblaylockmd.com/ Reference: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/05/12/vaccination-dangers.aspx Reference: Microglial Activation http://www.russellblaylockmd.com/ Reference: Aluminum Induced Immunoexcitotoxicity in Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Current Inorganic Chemistry,2 012, 2, 000-000 http://www.russellblaylockmd.com/ If your baby has a adverse reaction to Hep-B, DtaP or other vaccines you are prime targets to be accused of Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) which can be Vaccine-Induced Encephalitis? Reference: http://theworldlink.com/news/local/article_44a9c0e7-a115-553a-ae72-761f567f02f4.html Reference: http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/Vaccines/Sbs.aspx several articles on SBS Reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUMZ-O-OsG0 watch the 5 minute Trailer of ―Vaccine-Nation‖ a film by Gary Null 39.
  • 44. A leading Expert on SBS (Shaken Baby Syndrome) is attorney Toni Blake (San Diego, CA) • 1,500 SBS cases/year • 75% conviction rate once charged • Once in prison less than 5% are ever freed Reference : http://sbsdefense.com/ The Pourcyrous study out of the University of Tennessee published in the Journal of Pediatrics showed that single and multiple vaccination in 2 month old babies caused inflammation in the brain (encephalitis) consisted of administration of a single vaccine or multiple vaccines simultaneously at or about two months of age. The vaccines given were: DTaP (Infanrix), Hib (ActHIB), HBV (Engerix-B), IPV (Inactivated-IPOL™), and PCV7 (Prevnar). CRP (C-Reactive Protein) is the standard blood test performed to show body inflammation, in this case inflammation of the brain. CRP levels and cardio-respiratory manifestations were monitored for three days following immunizations in a neonatal intensive care unit sponsored by the University of Tennessee. • Elevations of CRP levels occurred in 70 percent of the infants administered single vaccines • In 85% of those administered multiple vaccines, 43% of which reached abnormal levels. • 16% had cardiopulmonary events within 48 hours of receiving the vaccine including bradycardia (slowing of heart rate) and apnea (cessation of breathing) • 17 % had brain hemorrhage with single vaccination and 24% had brain hemorrhage with multiple vaccination Pourcyrous other investigators also have reported on cardiorespiratory events following immunization with DTaP-based multivalent vaccines or when DTaP was given simultaneously with other vaccines. The researchers observed the highest cardiorespiratory events in infants that received DTaP, 42% of infants with body weight (BW) <1000 g. • Brain inflammation, as indicated by elevations of C-Reactive proteins. • Brain swelling (edema), which is one of the cardinal manifestations of inflammation. • Potentially lethal cardiorespiratory events that can be attributed to SIDS • brain hemorrhages also associated with Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) Reference: Journal of Pediatrics, 2007; 151:167-172 Reference: http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2011/06/01/vaccines-and-brain-inflammation/ 40.
  • 45. The truth about Polio Dr. Bernard Greenberg, a biostatistics expert, was chairman of the Committee on Evaluation and Standards of the American Public Health Association during the 1950s. He testified at a panel discussion that was used as evidence for the congressional hearings on polio vaccine in 1962. During these hearings he elaborated on the problems associated with polio statistics and disputed claims for the vaccine's effectiveness. He attributed the dramatic decline in polio cases to a change in reporting practices by physicians. Fewer cases were identified as polio after the vaccination for very specific reasons. "Prior to 1954 any physician who reported paralytic poliomyelitis was doing his patient a service by way of subsidizing the cost of hospitalization and was being community-minded in reporting a communicable disease. The criterion of diagnosis at that time in most health departments followed the World Health Organization definition: "Spinal paralytic poliomyelitis: signs and symptoms of non-paralytic poliomyelitis with the addition of partial or complete paralysis of one or more muscle groups, detected on two examinations at least 24 hours apart." Note that "two examinations at least 24 hours apart" was all that was required. Laboratory confirmation and presence of residual paralysis was not required. In 1955 the criteria were changed to conform more closely to the definition used in the 1954 field trials: residual paralysis was determined 10 to 20 days after onset of illness and again 50 to 70 days after onset.... This change in definition meant that in 1955 we started reporting a new disease, namely, paralytic poliomyelitis with a longer-lasting paralysis. Furthermore, diagnostic procedures have continued to be refined. Coxsackie virus infections and aseptic meningitis have been distinguished from paralytic poliomyelitis. Prior to 1954 large numbers of these cases undoubtedly were mislabeled as paralytic poliomyelitis. Reference: From Intensive Immunization Programs, Hearings before the Committee on Interstate & Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, 87th Congress, 2nd Session on H.R. 10541, Wash DC: Us Government Printing Office, 1962; p. 96-97 Simian Virus 40 (SV40):A Cancer Causing Monkey Virus from FDA-Approved Vaccines Between 1959 and 1960, Bernice Eddy, Ph.D., of the National Institute of Health (NIH) examined minced rhesus monkey kidney cells under a microscope. These were the cells of the same species of monkeys used to create and produce the oral polio vaccine. Dr. Eddy discovered that the cells would die without any apparent cause. She then took suspensions of the cellular material from these kidney cell cultures and injected them into hamsters. Cancers grew in the hamsters. Shortly thereafter, scientists at the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co. discovered what would later be determined to be the same virus identified by Eddy. This virus was named Simian Virus 40 or SV40 because it was the 40th simian virus found in monkey kidney cells. 41.
  • 46. In 1960, Doctors Benjamin Sweet and Maurice Hilleman, the Merck scientists who named the virus SV40, published their findings: ―Viruses are commonly carried by monkeys and may appear as contaminants in cell cultures of their tissues, especially the kidney . . . . The discovery of this new virus, the vacuolating agent, represents the detection for the first time of a hitherto ―non-detectable‖ simian virus of monkey renal cultures and raises the important question of the existence of other such viruses . . . . As shown in this report, all 3 types of Sabin‘s live poliovirus vaccine, now fed to millions of persons of all ages, were contaminated with vacuolating virus.‖ The vacuolating virus was another name for SV40. In 1962, Dr. Bernice Eddy published her findings in the journal produced by the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. She wrote: ―There is now an impressive list of oncogenic (cancer causing) viruses—the rabbit papilloma, polyoma, Rous sarcoma, the leukemia viruses . . . . It has been known for a number of years that monkeys harbor latent viruses . . . . The (SV40) virus was injected at once into 13 newborn hamsters and 10 newborn mice. Subcutaneous neoplasms indistinguishable from those induced by the rhesus monkey kidney extracts developed in 11 of the 13 hamsters between 156 and 380 days.‖ Subsequent studies performed in the early 1960s demonstrated that SV40 caused brain tumors in animals and that SV40 could transform or turn cancerous normal human tissue in vitro. A disturbing experiment performed during this era also suggested that SV40 could cause human cancers in man in vivo. In 1964, Fred Jensen and his colleagues took tissue from patients who were terminally ill with cancer. They exposed the tissue to SV40 and then after it was transformed, they implanted the tissue back into the patient. These implants grew into tumors in their human hosts. This suggested the possibility that SV40 could cause cancers in man. In July 2002, the National Academy of Science Institute of Medicine (IOM) Immunization Safety Committee convened a study into SV40 and cancer which culminated in a report published in October 2002. According to the IOM report ―SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer‖: The committee concludes that the biological evidence is strong that SV40 is a transforming [i.e., cancer-causing] virus, . . . that the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions, [and] that the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure from the polio vaccine is related to SV40 infection in humans. Reference: http://www.sv40foundation.org/CPV-link.html Reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edikv0zbAlU&feature=player_embedded MUST WATCH ! 10 minutes. World s foremost expert on vaccines the late Dr. Maurice Hilleman who created over 40 vaccines and worked for Merck Pharmaceuticals tells how the SV 40 cancer causing virus was introduced to humans by the Polio vaccine & HIV (aids virus) introduced by Hepatitis B vaccine. 42.
  • 47. MUST WATCH VIDEOS ON POLIO! ―The Exploding Autoimmune Epidemic - Dr. Tent - It's Not Autoimmune, you have Viruses‖ HISTORY TIMELINE ON POLIO VACCINE AND HOW MANY OTHER VIRUSES ARE CONTAMINATING THE VACCINES CAUSING MUCH ILLNESS, CANCER, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND DEATH by Dr. Tent 2 hours 7 minutes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8FCJ_VPyns&feature=youtu.be Origin of AIDS: The Polio Vaccine (CBC 'Witness', 2004) 44 minutes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZs1V8mpcoY 43.
  • 48. Oral polio caused 47,500 non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) in India in 2011 researchers reported ―…while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere [First, do no harm] was violated.‖ This was never on the evening news as are 99% of negative information on vaccines. Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591873 Jonas Salk, inventor of the Inactivated Polio Virus (IPV), testified before a Senate subcommittee that nearly all polio outbreaks since 1961 were caused by the oral polio vaccine. "Crib death" was so infrequent in the pre-vaccination era that it was not even mentioned in the statistics, but it started to climb in the 1950s with the spread of mass vaccination against diseases of childhood. - Harris L. Coulter, PhD. Gardasil and Cervarix , Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines Interview and speech by Dr. Diane Harper in 2009, lead developer and researcher who was involved in the safety and efficacy trials for the Human Papillomavirus vaccine (HPV) Gardasil®, manufactured by Merck Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Diane Harper states ―The best way to prevent cervical cancer is with routine Pap screening starting at age 21 years. Vaccination cannot prevent as many cervical cancers as can Pap screening. Pap screening with vaccination does NOT lower your chances of cervical cancer - Pap screening and vaccination lowers your chances of an abnormal Pap test. Gardasil® is associated with GBS [Guillian-Barre Syndrome] that has resulted in deaths. Pap screening using a speculum and taking cells from the cervix is not a procedure that results in death.‖ She further tells us, "Gardasil® can be offered along with Cervarix® as an option to prevent abnormal Pap test results in those women who can make an informed decision about how much they value this benefit compared to the rare risk of GBS. If a woman has no access to Pap screening, receiving HPV vaccines may help reduce cervical cancer IF the vaccines last long enough. At this time, Gardasil® is proven to last for at least 5 years, and Cervarix® for at least 8.5 years. Health policy analyses show that there will be no reduction in cervical cancer unless the vaccine lasts at least 15 years.‖ Reference: http://www.free-press-release.com/news-gardasil-developer-claims-vaccine-prevents-abnormal-pap-tests-not-cervical-cancer1297697975.html 44.
  • 49. Dr. Diane Harper states the ―main placebo used in clinical trials was aluminum adjuvant, the same adjuvant used in the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccine.‖ In order to have a valid study, you need the substance (vaccine) you are studying and a benign substance to compare the vaccine to, usually saline. Reference: http://www.free-press-release.com/news-dr-diane-harper-tells-us-the-truth-about-gardasil-part-iii-1298378031.html Dr. Harper explained, 70% of HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in one year. After two years, this rate climbs to 90%. Of the remaining 10% of HPV infections, only half coincide with the development of cervical cancer. ―4 out of 5 women with cervical cancer are in developing countries.‖ (Harper serves as a consultant to the World Health Organization (WHO) for HPV vaccination in the developing world.) Indeed, she surprised her audience by stating that the incidence of cervical cancer in the U.S. is so low that ―if we get the vaccine and continue PAP screening, we will not lower the rate of cervical cancer in the US.‖ The current death rate (2009) from cervical cancer is between 1.6 to 3.7 deaths per 100,000 women. The American Cancer Society (ACS) notes that ―between 1955 and 1992, the cervical cancer death rate declined by 74%‖ and adds that ―the death rate from cervical cancer continues to decline by nearly 4% each year.‖ ―There have been no efficacy trials in girls under 15 years,‖ she told us. Merck did study a small group of girls under 16 who had been vaccinated, but did not follow them long enough to conclude sufficient presence of effective HPV antibodies. As of 2009, 15,037 girls have officially reported adverse side effects from Gardasil to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). These adverse effects include Guilliane Barre, lupus, seizures, paralysis, blood clots, brain inflammation and many others. The CDC acknowledges that there have been 44 reported deaths Reference: http://www.pop.org/content/merck-researcher-admits-gardasil-guards-against-almost-nothing-985 45.
  • 50. HPV vaccine VAERS reports 2006 through February, 2013 Description Disabled Deaths Did Not Recover Abnormal Pap Smear Cervical Dysplasia Cervical Cancer Life Threatening Emergency Room Hospitalized Extended Hospital Stay Serious Adverse Events Total 935 133 5,875 519 209 62 551 10,335 2,954 227 3,963 29,362 Has the original Gardasil marketing campaign of "one less" muddied the waters and misinformed the public, who heretofore believed that a Pap smear was sufficient to protect them from cervical cancer? Dr. Diane Harper answers: ―If women were participating in Pap screening, or if as a parent you educated your daughter to seek Pap screening at the appropriate age (21 years) for her entire life, then she would have been very unlikely to be at risk for being "one" and would not be "one less." She would not have been "one" to begin with!‖ Yes, the marketing campaign was designed to incite the greatest fear possible in parents, so that there would be uptake of the vaccine. If parents and girls were told the benefits and harms of Pap screening and HPV vaccines as described above, an informed and valued decision would have been able to be made. Many may have chosen to continue with a lifetime of Pap screening and forgo the vaccines, with the unknowns of duration of efficacy and safety unable to be answered for many more years. Reference: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marcia-g-yerman/an-interview-with-dr-dian_b_405472.html 46.
  • 51. "The authors of a study that set out to prove the benefits of Gardasil were so shocked at their results the researchers stated in the study published in JAMA ―No significant evidence of a vaccine therapeutic effect was observed in analyses restricted to women who received all doses of vaccine or those with evidence of single HPV infections at entry. We observed no evidence of vaccine effects when we stratified the analysis on selected study entry characteristics reflective of various parameters. Similarly, no evidence of vaccine effects was observed in analyses stratified by other study entry parameters thought to potentially influence clearance rates and efficacy of the vaccine, including time since sexual initiation, oral contraceptive use, cigarette smoking, and concomitant infection with C trachomatis or N gonorrhea.‖ In other words, the authors found no evidence that the vaccine worked at all. This observation led the authors to offer this damning conclusion that appears to render Gardasil nothing more than a grand medical hoax: ―... rates of viral clearance over a 12-month period are not influenced by vaccination.‖ The study goes on to state words that should cause every doctor, Governor and health authority across the United States (and around the world) to rethink Gardasil vaccination policies: ―...given that viral clearance rates did not differ by treatment group and that persistent viral infection is the best established predictor of risk of progression, it is unlikely that vaccination could have a significant beneficial impact on rate of lesion progression.‖ Results from our community-based study provide strong evidence that there is little, if any, therapeutic benefit from the vaccine in the population we studied. Furthermore, we see no reason to believe that there is therapeutic benefit of the vaccine elsewhere because the biological effect of vaccination among already infected women is not expected to vary by population. In other words, the vaccines didn't work on the population studied, and there is no reason to believe that those same vaccines would magically work on other populations, since the biology of women and HPV is so similar across various populations. Reference: “Effect of Human Papillomavirus 16/18 L1 Viruslike Particle Vaccine Among Young Women With Preexisting Infection,” Journal of the American Medical Association, August, 2007 From the Merck Gardasil product insert 8.3Nursing Mothers Women 16 Through 45 Years of Age It is not known whether GARDASIL is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when GARDASIL is administered to a nursing woman. Reference: http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil/gardasil_pi.pdf pg. 12 of 30 47.
  • 52. Information from Merck presented to the FDA prior to approval states that "if you have been exposed to HPV 16 or 18 prior to injection and take the vaccine, you increase your risk of precancerous lesions, or worse, by 44.6%. Now, Merck's research is indicating that Gardasil may also 'provide cross-protection' against other strains of HPV that are closely related to HPV 16 and 18.‖ Reference: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4222B3.pdf Table 17 on pg. 13 of 30 This means prior exposure to these additional strains may pose an increased risk for cervical cancer also, if combined with vaccination. No one appears to be concerned with the increased risk of vaccination combined with prior exposure, as long as you take the vaccine. You will see no advertisements indicating the possibility of increased risk of the very cancer this vaccine is supposed to help you avoid.― This could indeed be a potential hazard that no one is talking about, let alone making parents fully aware of before vaccinating their daughters. HPV infection does NOT equal cervical cancer: • • • • In more than 70 percent of cases, HPV clears up on its own within a few weeks or months. In over 90 percent of cases, it's gone within two years, causing no symptoms or disease. Only about 26 percent of girls and women ages 14 to 59 have any strain at all of HPV; and Only 2 percent have strains 16 or 18 – the two that Gardasil and Cervarix protect against – meaning this vaccine is completely unnecessary because HPV infection very rarely leads to cancer. • Women whose partners wore condoms during vaginal intercourse are 70 percent less likely to become infected with HPV. That's a FAR greater level of protection than you can get from this vaccine! Many studies show that most cervical cancers in the developed world occur in women who have not had a Pap test in the past 5 years, or who have never had one at all. Reference: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/07/20/does-gardasil-actually-increase-your-risk-of-cervical-cancer.aspx Video Interview with Dr. Russell Blaylock regarding HPV and Gardasil. Dr. Russell Blaylock states in the video interview: • A physician that tells a mother or daughter that if you do not receive the Gardasil shot you will develop cervical cancer is a lie. • Cervical cancer is one of the rarest of all cancers. Around 12,000 cases/year with about 4,000 women who may develop and die of cervical cancer. • The number of serious adverse effects that occur in one year with the Gardasil vaccine far outnumber the number of women that may die from cervical cancer. Remember to multiply any adverse event statistic by at least 10 because only 1-10% are reported to VAERS. 48.
  • 53. • • • • Pap smears prevent over 80% of cervical cancers every year. Your chance of getting cervical cancer is less than 2,000th of 1% if you receive a yearly pap smear. The majority of cases develop in the age group of 50 and above. HPV alone does not cause cervical cancer. There needs to be co-infections (multiple infections) along with HPV like Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr plus a bacterial infection like Chlamydia. • Smoking is the highest risk factor and increases the chance of getting cervical dysplasia (precancerous lesions of the cervix) by 234% • Highest risk is the combination of smoking, poor diet and HPV. • Research in underdeveloped countries show that increasing folic acid(B9) and B12 decreases HPV infections and cervical cancer by 79%. • Vitamin C, curcumin, tumeric and other flavonoids Apples (flavonoids are in the skin), Blueberries, Broccoli, Cabbage, Capers, Chocolate (dark, not milk) and cocoa, Onions, Strawberries, Red grapes, Red wine, Tea (all kinds)demonstrate much more efficacy than Gardasil or Cervarix. • Gardasil and Cervarix has never been proven to prevent cervical cancer. • There are over 100 strains of HPV with 15 strains are linked to cancer. • It has been clinically proven that if you develop immunity to one or more of the virus strains than other virus strains will become dominant and the cervical cancer incident outcome does not change. Reference: http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=4D703FEAA094BED0DB02BEDC4507765C 49.
  • 54. 50.
  • 55. Influenza Influenza is sudden onset of chills, weakness, headache, aches and pains, sore throat, swollen glands, painful eye movements, loss of appetite and the most concerning symptom is a high fever. Symptoms are acute and last about 3-5 days followed by a dry hacking cough that may last for weeks. In severe cases a secondary pneumonia infection may occur. 14. There are over 200 bacteria and viruses that cause Influenza Like Illness (ILI) including: 1. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) 5. bocavirus 8. Mycoplasma 2. Parainfluenza viruses 6. coronavirus 9. Streptococcus 3. Metapneumovirus 7. rhinovirus, 4. Adenovirus – At least 52 distinct adenoviruses identified. Influenza viruses include: 1. Influenza C – very mild illness or asymptomatic. Not found in Humans. Found in farm animals. 2. Influenza B – First identified in 1940 and tends to target the elderly and nursing homes. 3. Influenza A – This is the influenza we are most concerned about and is connected with the seasonal flu, swine flu and bird flu. It has two antigens on the surface. An H antigen (Hemaglutinin) and a N antigen Influenza-Like-Illnesses (ILI) Acute Respiratory Infections (Neuraminidase). There are 15 different H antigens/proteins (H1-H15) Respiratory syncytial virus------------------6% and 9 different N antigens/proteins (N1-N9). These antigens can be in Other pathogens-------------------------------6% any given combinations. 5 groups of animals are hosts for influenza A: Rhinovirus------------------------------------55% Humans, Wild Birds, large land mammals, sea mammals and Coronaviruses--------------------------------23% domestic birds. Influenza A is associated with pandemics. Influenza A & B------------------------------10% Since 1977 the only influenza A virus associated with human illness are H3N2, H1N2, H1N1(swine flu), H5N1 (bird flu) and in Reference: Nicholson, K.G. et. al., Acute viral infections 2013 H7N9 (bird flu). of upper respiratory tract in elderly people living in From 1997 -2008 the CDC reports that over 86% of all Influenza the community: comparative, prospective, population like Illnesses (ILI) were not caused by Influenza A or Influenza B. based study of disease burden, British Medical Journal, This data was collected by 10 clinics designated by the CDC around No. 315, October 25, 1997, pp. 1060 the U.S. Reference: http://www.cdc/gov/flu/weekly/fluactivity.htm 51.
  • 56. The CDC states that the flu virus must be an exact match for the shot to be ―effective‖ and admits that it is a random guess as to which virus will be circulating based on what strain hit the South East Asia last year. Data is collected from 122 collection centers in 94 countries. They pick out two influenza A strains and one influenza B strain to be in the flu shot. There are hundreds of flu strains and subflu strains to choose from. There are 6 flu vaccines available on the market and if you decide to inject yourself with one you should ask what flu vaccine you are getting as all have different and similar chemicals and ingredients in them and if you do not get the same one every year you are exposing yourself to an increased risk of adverse reactions. Of special concern is Afluria made by CSL and licensed to Merck for use in the U.S. in 2010. March, 2009 in New Zealand & Australia many children under 5 experienced febrile seizures and increased fevers, many were hospitalized and some died. Of course, the FDA assures us there was no connection to the vaccine. The rubber stoppers they were using can react with the thimerosal and create a new chemical. There were also unexplained black particles in the vials that were injected Parents tend to gravitate toward Flumist because it is a squirt up the nose and there child will not have to deal with the shot. Flumist has been around since 2004 and it contains an attenuated live virus. Flumist is contraindicated with aspirin therapy and does not contain mercury. Once squirted up a child‘s nose the child usually will sneeze. In clinical trials it was proven that the virus actually sheds and causes the children and sometimes the people administering the Flumist to get sick. Maximal shedding occurred two days after vaccination up to 21 days. Contains 2mg of Gelatin associated with allergic reactions and seizures and 2mg of MSG, as a preservative associated with headaches. Children under 5 were found to have an increased rate of asthma within 42 days of the vaccine. Warning! Fluzone High-Dose is targeted for seniors and contains 4 times the amount of influenza antigen than other flu vaccines and has increased adverse effects. If vaccines worked the way the government and medical community claim they worked why should anyone be forced to be vaccinated. The person who received the shot is supposed to be protected from acquiring the infection. How crazy!! What a powerful belief system with no substance to it. It rivals religion on the groundwork of faith not science. How many people truly die from influenza a year? The media reports every year that 36,000 people die from influenza and 200,0000 are infected with the virus regardless of the severity of the flu season. The 36,000 figure came from a statistical model that was used to estimate the number of deaths in a 2003 study that encompassed 9 flu seasons from 1990-1999 and was published in JAMA. The CDC states 5-20% of the U. S. population will contract influenza and that young children, pregnant women, middle aged adults and seniors are at highest risk. In other words EVERYONE. Up until 2001 the only group recommended for flu shots were citizens 65 and older and the flu shot was always contraindicated for pregnant women until 2009. Reference: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us_flu_related_deaths.htm 52.
  • 57. The flu shot was officially labeled a Category C. Category C is for drugs that do not have enough human or animal studies to establish safety, or adverse fetal effects have been seen in animal studies but there is little human data. According to FDA: "Category C drugs are drugs that are more likely to cause problems for the mother or fetus. Also includes drugs for which safety studies have not been finished. The majority of these drugs do not have safety studies in progress. These drugs often come with a warning that they should be used only if the benefits of taking them outweigh the risks. Even though the CDC admits they do not know how many die from influenza the American Lung association does and keeps accurate records of how many have died from influenza From 1999-2006 the average annual death rate from influenza was 1, 244 not 36,000. A drop in the bucket with over 300,000,000 citizens in the U.S. Reference: http://www.lung.org/finding-cures/our-research/trend-reports/pi-trend-report.pdf This is a perfect example of how the government drives vaccination through fear, half truths and untruths. What do Studies Reveal? What is the efficacy of the flu shot? Remember only 10-15% of all flu like illnesses are caused by influenza. In a vaccine debate published in a Canadian Medical Journal an Italian Epidemiologist Dr. Demicheli refuted the statistic that the flu prevents 60-90% of flu cases. He states that this is ―both wrong and misleading……and refers only to the ability of the vaccine to produce antibodies effective against the virus. But this is not the important measure of vaccine efficacy. Instead, we should measure the ability of the vaccine to prevent clinical disease, in this case influenza, by this measure, vaccine efficacy is no greater than 25%.‖ So if we use this generous statistic of 25% efficacy and if 15% of ILI were caused by influenza the flu vaccine will maybe prevent 3.75% of all flu like illnesses in a trade off for chemicals, toxins, heavy metals, infertility, carcinogens, weaker immune systems, death and lifelong disabilities such as Autistic spectrum disorders, ADD, ADHD, seizures, disease and sickness requiring drugs which plays out perfectly for the pharmaceuticals. Do flu shots work? 85-90% of Flu like Illnesses are caused by 200 other viruses or bacteria and the Flu shot does not protect you against these illnesses and therefore ―many people vaccinated with the flu vaccine can still get 4-6 episodes of influenza-like illness during the flu season.‖ The flu vaccine is claimed to prevent 60-90% of infections caused by the specific virus in the vaccine. ―The flu vaccines work best in healthy adults‖. So flu vaccine only works best in people that do not need the flu shot. Are healthy adults the only ones that produce enough antibodies to give them a little protection or are their immune systems strong enough to fight off the infection in spite of the vaccination and not because of it? Who do we give the flu shot to, everyone including the sick and old and frail and babies with under developed immune systems the ones who supposedly really need them and the flu shot does not work as adverstised! Reference: MMWR November 9, 2001/(50)44; 964-6 53.
  • 58. Vaccine shortage proves there is no protection! In 2004 there was a flu vaccine shortage and 40% of the people who normally were vaccinated did not receive the flu shot, yet there was no spike in death rates due to this shortage. Vaccine mismatch proves there is no protection! 1968 and 1997 where there was a TOTAL mismatch and in essence nobody received the correct vaccine to produce antibodies for the flu that was circulating and causing sickness and again the death rate did not spike in both years. Sumit Majumdar, a physician and researcher at the University of Alberta, in Canada, offers another historical observation: rising rates of vaccination of the elderly over the past two decades have not coincided with a lower overall mortality rate. In 1989,only 15 percent of people over age 65 in the U.S. and Canada were vaccinated against flu. Today, more than 65 percent are immunized. Yet death rates among the elderly during flu season have increased rather than decreased. Reference: http://thinktwice.com/fluvac.pdf When Lisa Jackson, a physician and senior investigator with the Group Health Research Center, in Seattle, began wondering aloud to colleagues if maybe something was amiss with the estimate of 50 percent mortality reduction for people who get flu vaccine, the response she got sounded more like doctrine than science. ―People told me, ―No good can come of [asking] this,‖she says. ―Potentially a lot of bad could happen‖ for me professionally by raising any criticism that might dissuade people from getting vaccinated, because of course, ‗We know that vaccine works.‖ This was the prevailing wisdom.‖ Jackson‘s findings showed that outside of flu season, the baseline risk of death among people who did not get vaccinated was approximately 60 percent higher than among those who did, lending support to the hypothesis that on average, healthy people chose to get the vaccine, while the ―frail elderly‖ didn‘t or couldn‘t. In fact, the healthy-user effect explained the entire benefit that other researchers were attributing to flu vaccine, suggesting that the vaccine itself might not reduce mortality at all. Jackson‘s papers ―are beautiful,‖ says Lone Simonsen, who is a professor of global health at George Washington University, in Washington, D.C., and an internationally recognized expert in influenza and vaccine epidemiology. ―They are classic studies in epidemiology, they are so carefully done.‖ The results were also so unexpected that many experts simply refused to believe them. Jackson‘s papers were turned down for publication in the top-ranked medical journals. One flu expert who reviewed her studies for the Journal of the American Medical Association wrote, ―To accept these results would be to say that the earth is flat!‖ When the papers were finally published in 2006, in the less prominent International Journal of Epidemiology, they were largely ignored by doctors and public-health officials. ―The answer I got,‖ says Jackson, ―was not the right answer.‖ Reference: http://thinktwice.com/fluvac.pdf Dr. Tom Jefferson, a physician based in Rome and the head of the Vaccines Field at the Cochrane Collaboration, a highly respected international network of researchers who appraise medical evidence, is one of the world's best-informed researchers on the flu vaccine. He leads a team of researchers who have examined hundreds of vaccine studies. To quote directly from the article: ―The vast majority of the studies were deeply flawed, says Jefferson. "Rubbish is not a scientific term, but I think it's the term that applies to these studies.‖ 54.
  • 59. Jefferson has called for randomized, placebo-controlled studies of the vaccines. But vaccine pushers are resisting these clinical trials! They call the trials "unethical" but, in reality, they know that a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study would reveal the complete failure of flu vaccines, and they will do anything to prevent such a trial from happening. Don't you find it amazing that drug pushers and vaccine advocates claim they have "science" on their side, but they won't submit their vaccines to any real science at all? No placebo-controlled studies have ever been conducted on flu vaccines because the industry says they would be "unethical." So where do these people get off claiming their vaccines work at all? Reference: http://vran.org/about-vaccines/specific-vaccines/influenza-vaccine-flu-shot/about-vaccinesspecific-vaccinesinfluenzavaccine-flu-shotswine-flu-mania/ Not in babies: In a review of more than 51 studies involving more than 294,000 children including 17 papers from Russia it was found there was ―no evidence that injecting children 6-24 months of age with a flu shot was any more effective than placebo. Reference: ―Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.‖ The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 2 (2008). The Cochrane Collaboration also stated that they were astonished that the only one study done on children under 2 years of age with inactivated vaccine done on only 35 children over 30 years ago and yet they approved the vaccine for 6 months and up in 2004. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22895945 Not in children with asthma: A study 800 children with asthma, where one half were vaccinated and the other half did not receive the influenza vaccine. The two groups were compared with respect to clinic visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations for asthma. CONCLUSION: This study failed to provide evidence that the influenza vaccine prevents pediatric asthma exacerbations. Reference: ―Effectiveness of influenza vaccine for the prevention of asthma exacerbations.‖ Christly, C. et al. Arch Dis Child. 2004 Aug;89(8):734-5. Asthma study 2: A retrospective cohort study done from 1996-2006 done by the Mayo Clinic looked at charts of 263 children between 6 months and 18 years who had laboratory confirmed influenza. Results were that children with asthma that received the flu shot (this also applies to Flumist) had three times risk of hospitalization than children with asthma that did not receive the flu shot. Reference: The American Thoracic Society‘s 105th International Conference, May 15-20, 2009, San Diego Not in adults: In a review of 25 reports including more than 60,000 adults, ―Vaccination of healthy adults only reduced risk of influenza by 6% and reduced the number of missed work days by less than one day (0.16) days. It did not change the number of people needing to go to hospital or take time off work.‖ Reference: ―Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults.‖ The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 1 (2006). Not in the Elderly: In a review of 75 research studies over 40 years, ―Due to the poor quality of the available evidence any conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine for people 65 years and older cannot be drawn‖. Reference: ―Vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly.‖ The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 10 (2010). 55.
  • 60. What about pregnant women? A study published in the journal Human and Environmental Toxicology (HET) of VAERS records for the 2009 pandemic that never occurred recorded a 4,250% increase in fetal death among those that received the flu vaccine in 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters! The CDC tried to cover up these statistics and are still denying the truth. Read the full article and undeniable proof at the link below. H1N1 vaccine inserts states ―It is also not known whether these vaccines can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women or can affect reproduction capacity.‘‘ In other words pregnant women & fetuses are guinea pigs along with the world population. Reference: http://vactruth.com/2012/11/23/flu-shot-spikes-fetal-death and this government document supporting the increased death rate http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=comparison+of+vaers+fetal-loss+reports+during+three+consecutive+influenza+seasons Dr. Blaylock warns about vaccination during pregnancy - ―It is known that stimulating a woman‘s immune system during midterm and later term pregnancy significantly increases the risk that her baby will develop autism during childhood and schizophrenia sometime during the teenage years and afterward‖. Compelling scientific evidence also shows an increased risk of seizures in the baby and later as an adult. In fact, a number of neurodevelopmental and behavioral problems can occur in babies born to women immunologically stimulated during pregnancy.‖ Reference: Dr. Russell Blaylock on Dr. Mercola‘s; Swine Flu-One of The Most Massive Cover-ups in American: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/03/What-We-Have-Learned-About-the-Great-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.aspx Flu Vax Causes 5.5 Times More Respiratory Infections Reference: http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2013-06-02/flu-vax-causes-5-5-times-more-respiratory-infections/ Do you develop immunity if you acquire the flu naturally? Regular Flu – A titer of a 1:40 H-antigen antibody is correlated with a reduction in flu like illnesses according to the CDC. Swine Flu – After acquiring the swine flu naturally 90% of the patients developed a titer of 1:40 or greater showing immunity by the CDC standard and the antibodies can cross react with future flus to protect you. But truth is, people with lower titer were not infected with the flu and people with higher titers were infected with the flu. So why do we need flu shots? They really do not know what developing antibodies mean. 56.
  • 61. Reference: Ivan F. N. Hung et al. ―Effect of Clinical and Virological Parameters on the Level of Neutralizing Antibody against Pandemic Influenza A Virus H1N1 2009.‖ Clinical Infections Diseases 2010, 51:000-000. Researchers of four Canada studies of 2,000 people discovered that seasonal flu vaccination was associated with a 1.4-5 times greater risk of contracting the swine flu. Reference: Skowronski D M, ct al. Association between the 2008-2009 seasonal jnfluenza vaccine and pandemic H1N1illness during Spring-Summer 2009: four observational studies from Canada. PLoS Med. 2010 Apr 6; 7(4): cl000258 Tamiflu – Is only effective against culture confirmed influenza and is only effective if given within the first two days of symptoms. How many people are going to run to the doctors immediately and for only 1.3 days less of symptoms. A bad trade off in my opinion. A study in 2005 of 1,184 case reports inclusive of 75 children showed that the adverse effects included 32 neuropsychiatric events, 8 fatalities (4 sudden deaths, 5 cardiorespiratory arrests, 1 acute pancreatitis with cardiac arrest), and 12 skin/hypersensitivity events. Reference: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Memorandum, Food and Drug Administration, 25 August, 2005 By 2007-2008 resistant H1N1 flu began to appear and by 2009 all H1N1 flus were resistant to Tamiflu and created a mutant virus that is replicating and spreading like wildfire and were found to be 300 - 1,000,000 times more resistant than untreated viruses. Reference: Jesse D. Bloom, Lizhi Ian Gong, David Baltimore. Permissive Secondary Mutations Enable the Evolution of Influenza Oseltamivir Resistance Science, 4 June 2010: Vol. 328 no. 5983, pp 1272-1275 Reference : Kiso, M., ct al. ―Resistant influenza A viruses treated in children with Osceltamivir: descriptive study,‖ Lancet 364 (2004): 759-765: 15337401. Shedding Viruses in Vaccinated Children MUST WATCH! You will never look at vaccinated children the same!- Shedding Viruses https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKSeiAs_A4w 7 minutes 22 seconds 57.
  • 62. Functional status is a confounder of the association of influenza Influenza vaccination and risk of community-acquired pneumonia in vaccine and risk of all cause mortality in seniors. Int J Epidemiol. immunocompetent elderly people: a population-based, nested case2006 Apr;35(2):345-52 According to the authors: "... disability control study. Lancet. 2008 Aug 2;372(9636):398-405. indicators tended to be associated with both a higher risk of death and a decreased likelihood of vaccination. Consequently, adjustment for The authors concluded that "... influenza vaccination was not the functional status indicators moved the estimate of the association associated with a reduced risk of community-acquired pneumonia of influenza vaccination and risk of death closer to the null..." during the influenza season" Evidence of bias in estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in Benefits of examining influenza vaccine associations outside of seniors. Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;35(2):337-44 The authors influenza season concluded that, "The reductions in risk before influenza season Comment on: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Sep 1;178(5):527-33. indicate preferential receipt of vaccine by relatively healthy seniors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Sep 1;178(5):439-40. The authors Adjustment for diagnosis code variables did not control for this bias. explain how their approach "show that the lower risks of all-cause In this study, the magnitude of the bias demonstrated by the mortality and pneumonia hospitalization consistently observed in associations before the influenza season was sufficient to account studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated community-dwelling entirely for the associations observed during influenza season. " seniors during influenza season are largely, or perhaps entirely, due to bias..." Mortality benefits of influenza vaccination in elderly people: an ongoing controversy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Oct;7(10):658-66 According to the authors: "Recent excess mortality studies were unable to confirm a decline in influenza-related mortality since 1980, even as vaccination coverage increased from 15% to 65%... We conclude that frailty selection bias and use of non-specific endpoints such as all-cause mortality have led cohort studies to greatly exaggerate vaccine benefits. The remaining evidence base is currently insufficient to indicate the magnitude of the mortality benefit, if any, that elderly people derive from the vaccination programme." Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review. BMJ. 2009 Feb 12;338:b354 According to the authors: "Evidence is of poor quality, and studies with conclusions in favor of vaccines are of significantly lower methodological quality. Influenza vaccines studies sponsored by industry are published in journals with higher impact factors and are cited more but are of similar size and quality to the others." Many of these studies above also explain that earlier positive results appear to have been due to various types of bias, and when the bias is removed, the alleged benefits of vaccinating against the flu disappear. 58.
  • 63. What Do government Documents Reveal? Vaccination - the physical act of administering a vaccine. Effective Vaccine – A vaccine that creates an antibody. NOTE: Cure, healing or immunity is not in this definition. Immunization – the process of inducing artificial immunity by administering a immunobiologic - an antigenic or antibody-containing preparation derived from a pool of human or animal donors, including vaccines, toxoids, immune globulins, and antitoxins; used for immunization and immune therapy. Immune response (production of antibodies) does not equal immunity! Antibodies do NOT equal immunity. Antibodies simply indicate exposure to the pathogen. It is well known in immunology that a person with high levels of antibodies can still get the disease! A CDC document states; ― Although the persons often use vaccination and immunization interchangeably the terms are not synonymous; the administration of a immunobiologic cannot not be automatically equated with development of adequate immunity.‖ This statement means that if you receive a vaccine, it does not mean you will develop an antibody and if you do develop an antibody that does not mean you are immuned. Reference: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) vol.43/No.RR-1 1994 Vaccine Safety Studies 1. A valid safety study compares a vaccine with sterile water or normal saline (Placebo) but many if not all vaccine safety studies compare a new vaccine to another vaccine already in use, mercury or Aluminum adjuvant (such as with Gardasil) that is given to the control group and is found in many of the vaccines thus the efficacy and true adverse effects are not revealed. The researchers site that it would be unethical to not give the control group a vaccine or adjuvant. These are the irrational people that are in charge of helping to make policies that affect everyone‘s health in a very negative way. An example of a invalid gov‘t study is http://www.nih.gov/news/health/mar2010/niaid-09.htm Reference: 1991 Institute of Medicine Report: Adverse effects of pertussis and Rubella vaccines 2. Studies only include healthy children even though vaccines are given to all children after they are approved including children who are immuno-compromised and have neurologic diseases and seizures and the reason that will be given is that it is riskier to not have the shot than to acquire the disease. 3. Any data that does not prove that the vaccine is safe is wiped off the record including serious side effects. Two examples from the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Example 1: A study comparing a bivalent Hib and Hep. B vaccine and two separate shots of Hib and Hep. B included 882 children of which 17 or 2% had serious adverse events including tachypnea, vomiting, seizures, diarrhea, vitreous hemmoragh, dehydration, reflux esophagus, bronchitis and pneumonia 59.
  • 64. Example 2: Study comparing two Hep. B vaccines on infants had several adverse reactions including SIDS and seizures. Adverse reactions in both studies were judged by investigators to not be vaccine related and the conclusion is that the vaccine is safe and effective. When you start with a flawed premise than the conclusion is flawed and not valid! 4. Studies data are skewed for a favorable outcome for the pharmaceutical Industry Example - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-3yrrgkcLY&feature=youtu.be MUST WATCH! 8 minutes How effective are vaccines? Research Efficacy - The ability to provoke an antibody. The science of vaccines is based on research efficacy not clinical efficacy Clinical efficacy - The ability to prevent an infection which is associated with cellular immunity, your T and B cells, not antibodies. The only fact the pharmaceuticals know is that we may develop an antibody from a vaccination and not immunity along with it. Dr. John March is Head of Mycoplasmology at the Moredun Research Institute (MRI), Edinburgh Vaccine development; molecular biologist where they study vaccines on animals said "Human trials generally correlate "antibody" responses with protection - that is if the body produces antibodies (proteins) which bind to vaccine components, then it must be working and safe. Dr March says ―antibody response is generally a poor measure of protection and no indicator at all of safety. Particularly for viral diseases, the 'cellular' immune response is all important, and antibody levels and protection are totally unconnected.‖ The CDC states that the ―personal benefits‖ of vaccination are: 1. Protection against ―symptomatic illness.‖ 2. Improved ―quality of life.‖ 3. Prevention of death CDC states the ―Societal benefits‖ are: 1. Maintenance of ―Herd immunity.‖ 2. Prevention of outbreaks. 3. Reduction of healthcare costs. 4. Maintenance of productivity. Reference: MMWR Feb. 8, 2002/vol.51/No. RR-2, pg. 1 At least 6 vaccines list ear infections as a side effect -Biavax (Rubella & Mumps), Engerix-b (Hep-B), Tetramune (DPT & HiB), Prevnar, Varivax & MMR. As of 2002 there is a 88% vaccination rate among children for pertussis yet outbreaks continue to occur. Reference: MMWR Feb. 2, 2002/51(04); 72-76 Fully Vaccinated Day Care in Israel Reference: Emerging Infectious Diseases vol. 6, No. 5; Sept.-Oct. 2000 Pertussis in highly vaccinated population, Netherlands. Reference: Emerging Infectious Diseases vol. 6, No. 4. July-Aug. 2000 60.
  • 65. Pertussis in North-West Western Australia; All vaccinated Reference: Communicable Diseases Intelligence 2000 Vol. 24 No. 12 Pertussis Outbreak in Vermont (1996) - In 1996, over 280 cases of pertussis cases were identified in Vermont. Here is the breakdown of the age groups of those infected: 12 (4%) were aged less than 1 year, 32 (11%) were 1-4 years, 42 (15%) were 5-9 years, 129 (46%) were 10-19 years, 65 (23%) were greater than or equal to 20 years How many of these 215 children were vaccinated? According to the report, of the children who had a known vaccine status were 5 children aged 7-47 months were partially vaccinated, 14 children aged 7-47 months were vaccinated with 3 doses, 49 children aged 7-18 years were partially vaccinated, 106 children aged 7-18 years were fully vaccinated Disturbingly, 174 children were vaccinated and over half (61%) of the school children were considered ―fully vaccinated!‖ It‘s also important to keep in mind that in 1996, 97% of children aged 19-35 months in Vermont had received three or more doses of DT or DTP vaccine. Complete failure in vaccinated children: at least 80.9% vaccinated Reference: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00049244.htm Pertussis Safety Study – ―The number of children included in DTaP trials were insufficient to estimate the risk to severe reaction.‖ In other words all of our children and ourselves are guinea pigs for this vaccine. Reference: CDC: Epidemiology and Prevention. The Pink Book, 6th edition, Chapter 6: Pertussis pg. 79 Pertussis Infection in Fully Vaccinated Children in Day Care Centers (2000) Many health professionals are adamant that vaccines protect against infection. Evidence from a field investigation in Israel challenges this belief. In 2000, a child died suspected of having pertussis. The baby received the first dose of DTP at two months of age – all family members were completely vaccinated with four doses of DTP. The day care centers that two siblings had attended during the child‘s illness were investigated. All the children in the day care had been vaccinated in infancy with four doses of diphtheria-tetanus toxoid pertussis (DTP) vaccine, and a booster dose at 12 months of age. Five fully vaccinated children were found to be colonized with Bordetella pertussis. Conclusion: ―Vaccinated adolescents and adults may serve as reservoirs for silent infection and become potential transmitters to unprotected infants. The whole-cell vaccine for pertussis is protective only against clinical disease, not against infection. Therefore, even young, recently vaccinated children may serve as reservoirs and potential transmitters of infection.‖ They re-emphasized again, ―Our results indicate that children ages 5-6 years and possibly younger, ages 2-3 years, play a role as silent reservoirs in the transmission of pertussis in the community.‖ Vaccine coverage in daycare: 100% Reference: http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/6/5/00-0512_article.htm From 1997-2000 there were 79 pertussis deaths mostly in Hispanics in Southwest who live in close quarters with many populations in small quarters, poor and did not have a nutritional diet. By comparison there were a total of Dr. David Kessler 57 deaths in 1998 reported to VAERS from Pertussis Vaccination (DTaP) and ―only 1% of serious adverse reactions are actually reported to VAERS‖ estimated by Dr. David Kessler. so the real figure to deaths due to the FDA Commissioner 1990-1997 DTaP shot could be at least 570 or more for one year. 61.
  • 66. Reference: Kessler, David JAMA June 2, 1993 vol. 269; No. 22, p. 27-35 Reference: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Safety/MedWatch/UCM201419.pdf Mumps outbreak in 2009 97% of vaccinated Jewish children between the ages of 13-17. 89% were vaccinated twice and 9% were vaccinated once. Conclusions from the study: ―The epidemiologic features of this outbreak suggest that intense exposures, particularly among boys in schools, facilitated transmission and overcame vaccine-induced protection in these patients. High rates of two-dose coverage reduced the severity of the disease and the transmission to persons in settings of less intense exposure.‖ Another perfect example of how a play with words ignore the fact that little to no protection was provided by the vaccine and was explained away. This is as ridiculous as it gets. Why do we get vaccines if there is a so called ―intense exposure‖ that will overcome the so called protection of a vaccine and what is an intense exposure? Reference: Albert E. Barskey, M.P.H., Cynthia Schulte, R.N., B.S.N., Jennifer B. Rosen, M.D., Elizabeth F. Handschur, M.P.H., Elizabeth Rausch-Phung, M.D., M.P.H., Margaret K. Doll, M.P.H., Kisha P. Cummings, M.P.H., E. Oscar Alleyne, Dr.P.H., Patricia High, M.H.S., Jacqueline Lawler, M.P.H., Andria Apostolou, Ph.D., M.P.H., Debra Blog, M.D., M.P.H., Christopher M. Zimmerman, M.D., M.P.H., Barbara Montana, M.D., M.P.H., Rafael Harpaz, M.D., Carole J. Hickman, Ph.D., Paul A. Rota, Ph.D., Jennifer S. Rota, M.P.H., William J. Bellini, Ph.D., and Kathleen M. Gallagher, D.Sc., M.P.H. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1704-1713November 1, 2012DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1202865 Examples of an outbreak in Mumps in Europe. Rural Mumps outbreak with 95% of the population vaccinated. A study comparing non vaccinated children with the Rubini mumps strain used in the vaccine showed NO detectable benefit. Three mumps vaccines-Rubini, Jeryl-Lynn and Urabe (the one withdrawn because it caused encephalitis) all produced excellent antibody levels but those vaccinated with the Rubini strain had the same attack rate as those not vaccinated at all, there were some who said that it actually caused outbreaks. Reference: BMJ 1999; 319:352 (7 August) Comparative efficacy of three mumps vaccines during disease outbreak in Eastern Switzerland: cohort study An Outbreak of Chickenpox in Elementary School Children with TwoDose Varicella Vaccine Recipients (2006) Have you ever noticed the answer to failed vaccination is more vaccination? In June 2006, a second dose of the chickenpox (varicella) vaccine was recommended for school entry. Shortly after school had begun, the Arkansas Department of Health was notified of a varicella outbreak in students. Vaccination information was available for 871 (99%) of the 880 children. Ninety-seven percent of the children had been vaccinated for varicella! In this outbreak, 84 cases were reported. Vaccine coverage: 97%. Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19593254 Reference: http://www.nvic.org/downloads/49-doses-posterb.aspx 62. Updated; 49 doses of 14 vaccines by age 6 in the U. S
  • 67. Measles Outbreak in a Fully Immunized Secondary-School Population (1985) In 1985, an outbreak of measles occurred in a secondary school located in Corpus Christi, Texas. More than 99% had records of vaccination with live measles vaccine. The investigators concluded ―that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.‖ Vaccine coverage for school: 99%. Reference: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198703263161303 Reference: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000359.htm Hepatitis – B Vaccine Hepatitis B Vaccine side effects – Hep-B and DTaP are the two worse vaccines. More than 45 adverse effects of Hep-B vaccines are recorded by researcher Dr. Andrea Valeri of Italy. • Autism Colitis • Polyneuropathy Transvers myelitis • Guilliane-Barre Erythema nodosum • Myasthenias Gravis Rheumatoid arthritis • CNS Demyelination Diabetes and Many more In the May 24, 1996 New Zealand Medical Journal, Dr. Classen reported that there was a 60% increase in Type I diabetes (juvenile diabetes) following a massive campaign in New Zealand from 1988 to 1991 to vaccinate babies six weeks of age or older with hepatitis B vaccine. His analysis of a group of 100,000 New Zealand children prospectively followed since 1982 showed that the incidence of diabetes before the hepatitis B vaccination program began in 1988 was 11.2 cases per 100,000 children per year while the incidence of diabetes following the hepatitis B vaccination campaign was 18.2 cases per 100,000 children per year. The researchers estimate up to 10,000 cases of vaccine induced Type I diabetes occurs in the US every year at a cost of $1,000,000 per case in lost productivity and medical expenses. From 1992-2005 adverse reactions as recorded by VAERS (remember to multiply this number by at least 10 for a more accurate number) 36,788 adverse reactions and of these 14,800 were serious (required hospitalization, life threatening health problems or disabilities and 781 people died from the vaccine. Reference: VAERS When Hep-B was first introduced 87% of Pediatricians and Physicians did not think children needed the HEP-B vaccine because they knew infants rarely contracted Hepatitis-B. Reference: Pediatrics, 1993; 91:699-702 and Reference: Journal of Family Practice, 1993; 36:153-57 63.
  • 68. Hepatitis-B vaccine manufactures state they are targeting babies because they failed to target prostitutes, and drug users and adults who refuse vaccination and babies are easily accessible. They target babies [a low risk group (herd)] in hopes of protecting the unvaccinated adults [higher risk group (herd)]. The infants are taking all the risks for no benefit! But 5 years after the third Hep-B injection in a child 42%-60% of the children did not have antibody protection and another study showed that 50% did not have antibody protection after 4 years. So why are we giving this dangerous vaccine to our babies when it is useless by there own admission after 5 years? ANSWER - FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAIL! Reference: NEJM, 315:209-14 and Infection Control and Epidemiology, 1990; 11:525-30 and Reference: American Journal of Public Health, 1990; 80:590-93 Study in Journal of Apoptosis shows Hepatitis-B vaccine causes liver damage and increases the risk of Hepatitis in adults because of the aluminum adjuvant In this new study, aluminum hydroxide induced loss of mitochondrial integrity and cell death in mouse liver cells exposed to low doses of the Hepatitis-B vaccine containing the toxic adjuvant. The mitochondria is the ―powerhouse‖ of a cell where energy is created and cellular respiration occurs. It is not surprising that compromising the mitochondria of liver cells results in outright death of the cell itself. This new study corroborates other research indicating liver damage from Hep-B. In 1999, it was found that children less than 6 years old had a nearly 300% increase in the incidence of liver problems if they had been vaccinated with Hepatitis B versus those children that did not have the Hep-B jab. It‘s not just the young developing livers of children that suffer from the toxic Hep B. The Journal Hepatogastroenterology reported in 2002 that the Hepatitis B vaccine was statistically associated with increased risk for hepatitis, gastrointestinal disease, and liver function test abnormalities in adult females. A study published in The Journal of Moleucular Biology Reports indicates that damage from Hep-B is likely caused by alteration in the expression of 144 genes in mouse livers within one day of vaccination, 7 of which are associated with inflammation and metabolism. Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22249285 Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10230847 Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12397738 Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21691704 64.
  • 69. When a representative from a pharmaceutical was asked what evidence he had that showed the Hep. B vaccine was safe for one day old infants he said ―We have none. Our studies were done on 5 and 10 year olds.‖ Hep. B is given to infants within the first 24 hours of life. Reference: The Congressional Quarterly, August 25, 2000, pg. 2000 The hepatitis B vaccine is made from the blood of human beings infected with hepatitis B; ie someone at high risk of developing AIDS. A Lancet study of 1991 showed a 20% hepatitis infection rate in 358 hepatitis-vaccinated Gambian children. Chicken Pox Vaccine side effects Varivax by Merk. Developed in 1973 and uses the Oka strain from Japan. The vaccine is attenuated (weakened) by passing it 11 times through diploid embryonic fibroblast tissue (aborted fetal lung tissue), 12 times through guinea pig embryonic cells, 1 time through WI-38 (diploid) human embryonic lung fibroblasts and 7 times through MRC-5 (diploid) human embryonic lung fibroblasts. There is nearly 3000 viral particles in one injection all contaminated with the above tissue, chemicals, toxins, carcinogens etc. If a vaccinated child never acquires the disease naturally as a child but does acquire chicken pox as an adult the disease is much more serious. They are 10-20 x‘s more likely to be hospitalized than if they acquired the disease as they should as a child and developed lifelong immunity. The risk of death as a child is 7:1,000,000 and the risk of death as an adult is 250:1,000,000 Reference: MMWR July 12, 1996/45(RR11) In order to maintain a lifelong immunity we need to be re-exposed to the virus every so often to boost our immune system and there lies another problem if there is no one sick to be exposed to it. The lead researcher of chicken pox at the CDC is expecting outbreaks of shingles because of lack of chicken pox to be exposed to in order to boost our immune system. Vaccination is actually causing outbreaks of shingles. CDC‘s solution is to create another vaccine for shingles. We need to let nature take its course and provide medical supportive care when needed. Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertussis vaccine (DTaP) Diptheria-Pertussis-Tetanus side effects(DTaP) - In 1982 there was a study of 103 SIDS deaths by the American Academy of Neurology. 66% (68) received a DPT shot up to 3 weeks prior to death 6.5 % died within 12 hours, 13% died within 24 hours, 26% died within 3 days, 37% died within 7 days, 61% died within 14 days and 70% died within 21 days. The CDC replaced the DTP with an acellular vaccine DTaP but SIDS is still occurring. Refer to Tripedia insert for verifications of SIDS, Autism & other serious adverse reactions. Reference: W. C. Torch ―Diptheria-Pertussis-Tetanus (DPT) immunization: A potential cause of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), American Academy of Neurology, 34th annual meeting, April 25-May 1, 1982, Neurology 32(4), pg. 2 65.
  • 70. From Page 11 of 13 of Tripedia (DTaP) vaccine insert: In the German case-control study and US open-label safety study in which 14,971 infants received Tripedia vaccine, 13 deaths in Tripedia vaccine recipients were reported. Causes of deaths included seven SIDS, and one of each of the following: enteritis, Leigh Syndrome, adrenogenital syndrome, cardiac arrest, motor vehicle accident, and accidental drowning. All of these events occurred more than two weeks post immunization. The rate of SIDS observed in the German case-control study was 0.4/1,000 vaccinated infants. The rate of SIDS observed in the US open-label safety study was 0.8/1,000 vaccinated infants and the reported rate of SIDS in the US from 19851991 was 1.5/1,000 live births. By chance alone, some cases of SIDS can be expected to follow receipt of whole-cell pertussis DTP or DTaP vaccines. The pharmaceuticals say every adverse event is by chance. Don‘t be naive and swallow their blatant lies. That is a chance I am not willing to take. Are you? Vaccines are much worse than any disease! There is a relationship between SIDS and DTaP. SIDS is most likely to occur between 2 and 4 months of age and DTaP is given at 2, 4 and 6 months. Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002533/ Reference: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html Additional Adverse Reactions: • As with other aluminum-containing vaccines, a nodule may be palpable at the injection sites for several weeks. Sterile abscess formation at the site of injection has been reported. • Rarely, an anaphylactic reaction (i.e., hives, swelling of the mouth, difficulty breathing, hypotension, or shock) has been reported after receiving preparations containing diphtheria, tetanus, and/or pertussis antigens. • Arthus-type hypersensitivity reactions, characterized by severe local reactions (generally starting 2-8 hours after an injection), may follow receipt of tetanus toxoid. • A few cases of peripheral mononeuropathy and of cranial mononeuropathy have been reported following tetanus toxoid administration, although available evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relation. • A review by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) found evidence for a causal relationship between tetanus toxoid and both brachial neuritis and Guillain-Barré syndrome. • A few cases of demyelinating diseases of the CNS (Multiple Sclerosis or MS ) have been reported following some tetanus toxoidcontaining vaccines or tetanus and diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccines, although the IOM concluded that the evidence was inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship. Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting. Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine. 66.
  • 71. What is encephalopathy? Encephalopathy is a term for any diffuse disease of the brain that alters brain function or structure. Encephalopathy may be caused by infectious agent (bacteria, virus, or prion), metabolic or mitochondrial dysfunction, brain tumor or increased pressure in the skull, prolonged exposure to toxic elements (including solvents, drugs, radiation, paints, industrial chemicals, and certain metals), chronic progressive trauma, poor nutrition, or lack of oxygen or blood flow to the brain. The hallmark of encephalopathy is an altered mental state. Depending on the type and severity of encephalopathy, common neurological symptoms are progressive loss of memory and cognitive ability, subtle personality changes, inability to concentrate, lethargy, and progressive loss of consciousness. Other neurological symptoms may include myoclonus (involuntary twitching of a muscle or group of muscles), nystagmus (rapid, involuntary eye movement), tremor, muscle atrophy and weakness, dementia, seizures, and loss of ability to swallow or speak. Blood tests, spinal fluid examination, imaging studies, electroencephalograms, and similar diagnostic studies may be used to differentiate the various causes of encephalopathy. Reference: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM101580.pdf page 11 of 13 and Reference: http://www.rxlist.com/tripedia-drug/side-effects-interactions.htm and Reference: https://www.vaccineshoppe.com/assets/pdf/tripedia.pdf page 11 of 13 Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1860500/ Definition of demyelinating disease of the CNS Reference: http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/encephalopathy/encephalopathy.htm Definition of encephalopathy After the Simpsonwood meeting in June 2000 the FDA approved a Tripedia with a trace amount of Thimerosal (mercury) on 3/7/2001. Reference: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm101582.htm The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was established by the National Childhood Injury act of 1986 and is a no-fault alternative to the traditional tort system for resolving vaccine injury claims that provides compensation to people found to be injured by certain vaccines and was created because the government knows vaccines cause injury and wanted to shield the pharmaceuticals from lawsuits at the cost of freedom to choose what goes into our bodies and a chance for a good quality of life. The CDC, FDA, NIH all say in response to any potential side effects ― Temporal association does not prove causality.‖ In other words just because something happened around the same time as the vaccination that does not mean the vaccination caused it. Instead of an error on the side of caution and asking questions and running valid long term studies they choose to just wipe away any possible relationship using the above statement. The National Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 set up the vaccine injury court and took away any incentive for the pharmaceuticals to try and create safe and effective vaccines by making it illegal to sue them for damages. This is the only product that is shielded from lawsuits based on design deffects. The Gov‘t and physicians are not liable for any damages. The Vaccine Injury Court is funded by a .75 tax every dose of vaccine. A shot with 3 different vaccines in it, MMR is charged $2.25 in tax. The patient receiving a vaccine pays for the injuries caused by vaccines. 67.
  • 72. How do the physicians dismiss adverse vaccine reactions? • The vaccine triggered the inevitable • This person had a weakness that would of manifested at some point with or without the vaccination. If you or your child develop an adverse reaction than you are genetically defective according to the wisdom of todays medical world. • A vaccine injury must occur within 14 days of receiving the vaccine for the Gov‘t & physicians to consider it was caused by a vaccine. A quote from the CDC Pink Book on Vaccines says ―There is no distinct syndrome from vaccine administration, and there for, many temporally associated adverse events probably represent background illness rather illness caused by the vaccine… the DTP may stimulate or precipitate inevitable symptoms or underlying CNS disorder, such as seizures, infantile spasms, epilepsy or SIDS. By chance alone, some of these cases will seem to be temporally related to DTaP‖ thus automatically dismissing any possibility that there may be a connection and dismissing any opportunity to investigate. Reference: CDC: Epidemiology and Prevention, The Pink Book, 6th edition, Chapter 6: Pertussis, pg. 80 The Myth of Herd Immunity as Applied to Vaccines? The true definition of Natural Herd Immunity is when disease has burned itself out within a population as with the plague, smallpox, typhus and every other disease in history. The herd (population) is now immuned. It is natural selection. It has to do with nature, not vaccines. The definition of herd immunity as used with vaccines is if enough people in the population develop immunity than the rest of the population theoretically will be protected from getting the disease through the numbers game. The more people vaccinated the less that will be susceptible to the disease and less chance of conferring (giving) the disease to someone else. Herd immunity came from a 10 year study on measles by Dr. A. W. Hedrich in the state of MA starting in 1929. It showed that when 66% of the population had immunity the other 33% did not acquire measles and the doctor labeled it herd immunity. Due to the many failures of vaccination the goal is now to vaccinate at least 90%-95% of the population. Why did 33% not contract the disease? It could have been that the other 33% immune system was healthy enough to fight of the infection or they were already immune to measles naturally. The CDC‘s excuse that if an unvaccinated child comes down with a disease , the disease becomes so virulent that vaccinated children may get sick. How can that be if vaccination prevents acquiring the disease? This is a very popular way to explain away the failures of vaccination in the vaccine myth world. Herd Immunity is a powerful belief and myth that drives the government and medical community to mandate vaccination. Dr. Russell Blaylock, a neurosurgeon and researcher stated ―When I was In medical school, we were taught that all of the childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime.‖ This thinking existed for over 70 years. It was only until recently it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or 68.
  • 74. more of the population was unprotected for decades. If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccineinduced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.‖ The added fact that many of the vaccines had an efficacy of only 30-40% means that the actual number of people that are unprotected is 60-70%. This destroys any theory of herd immunity as applied to the vaccine. The original idea that vaccination could strengthen the herd's immunity, assumed that there was only one clinical event, and that one natural exposure equated life-long immunity. But this was not the case back when the diseases circulated freely. Vaccinators miss the point that the body defends most efficiently as a result of ongoing re-exposure. They try to mimic this with boosters. But the vaccination plan leaves the elderly(due to vaccine-induced immunity being short-lived and antigens taken out of circulation) and the very young(due to lack of transferrable maternal immunity) more vulnerable to several diseases that were not a threat to them before vaccination. In the case of chicken pox, vaccination renders the elderly more apt to shingles infections, because the herd has now lost the continued and benign re-exposures to children with chicken pox. In a controlled study over 86% of whooping cough in school age children occurs in the fully vaccinated! Reference: Harnden, Anthony.2006. ―Whooping cough in school age children with persistent cough: prospective cohort study in primary care.”BMJ; 333, PMID 16829538. We’ve had over 90% baby vaccination rates for whooping cough vaccines for over 11 years…since 2000, AND they’ve included even more shots since then for the adolescents at the time… and yet more, after 2000… AND here we are with whooping cough in EVEN higher numbers than it was before 1960? Don’t you think that’s absolutely astonishing? …Australia, which has had over a 95% whooping cough vaccination rate since 2000, is having the largest outbreak in their history since pertussis vaccination started. The same is happening in USA, and their rate of vaccination is even higher than Australia. So what do you think is happening there? - Hilary Butler Prior to vaccination, infants were less susceptible to pertussis because real ―herd immunity‖ was in place, and mothers were passing on immunity to their infants during the vulnerable time. Since vaccination, this herd immunity has actually been abolished, and infants are now more susceptible due to their vaccinated or non-immune mothers lacking specific antibody and cellular immunity for pertussis. This can be verified in the medical literature: ―Diminishing maternal immunity increases the risk of infection among the youngest age groups, who have not yet received at least two doses of the vaccine.‖ Reference: Hochwald O et. al, 2006. ―The return of pertussis: Who is responsible? What can be done?‖IMAJ vol 8, pp301-307 70.
  • 75. Vaccinated Children versus Unvaccinated Children Children who receive the entire 3-shot series of Hepatitis B Vaccine have a 9x higher rate of developmental disabilities than unvaccinated children. Hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in US children aged 1-9 years Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, September 2008 Carolyn Gallagher* and Melody Goodman Excerpt: ―The odds of receiving EIS [special education services] were approximately nine times as great for vaccinated boys (n¼46) as for unvaccinated boys (n¼7), after adjustment for confounders. This study found statistically significant evidence to suggest that boys in United States who were vaccinated with the triple series Hepatitis B vaccine, during the time period in which vaccines were manufactured with thimerosal, were more susceptible to developmental disability than were unvaccinated boys.‖ Note: This is the only published study we know of in the world that compares vaccinated children to unvaccinated children. Reference: http://www.fourteenstudies.org/pdf/hep_b.pdf Vaccinated children have higher rates of autism and ADHD than unvaccinated children. Generation Rescue: Unvaccinated children phone survey Survey USA Phone Survey Excerpt: All vaccinated boys, compared to unvaccinated boys: - Vaccinated boys were 155% more likely to have a neurological disorder (RR 2.55) - Vaccinated boys were 224% more likely to have ADHD (RR 3.24) - Vaccinated boys were 61% more likely to have autism (RR 1.61) Older vaccinated boys, ages 11-17 (about half the boys surveyed), compared to older unvaccinated boys: - Vaccinated boys were 158% more likely to have a neurological disorder (RR 2.58) - Vaccinated boys were 317% more likely to have ADHD (RR 4.17) - Vaccinated boys were 112% more likely to have autism (RR 2.12) 71.
  • 76. (Note: older children may be a more reliable indicator because many children are not diagnosed until they are 6-8 years old, and we captured data beginning at age 4.) Note: This is not a published study, it's a phone survey. Reference: Page does not exist anymore Reference for both studies and many more: http://www.fourteenstudies.org/ourstudies.html There is an ongoing anecdotal study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated. If your children are vaccinated or unvaccinated you can contribute to the study at this link http://vaccineinjury.info/home.html . This is just one example of a comparison between vaccinated versus unvaccinated children The bar graphs to the left compare Diabetes, Epilepsy, neuro/autoimmune and thyroid disorders in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Vaccinated children had 21x‘s more Thyroid disease, almost 22x‘s more Autoimmune disorders, 25x‘s more Neurologic disorders, 11.5x‘s more Epilepsy and 8.4x‘s more Diabetes than unvaccinated children. You can see the ongoing results of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children at: http://vaccineinjury.info/results-vaccinated/comparison-vaccinated-unvaccinated.html Finally! An official 3 year study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children STUDY TITLE: ―Vaccination Status and Health Outcomes among Homeschool Children‖ is underway and will be a nationwide study. The lead investigator is a visiting professor in the School of Health Sciences at Jackson State University, has MPH and Dr. PH degrees in epidemiology from Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine and an MA in sociology from the University of Essex (UK). 72.
  • 77. The study already has ethics approval and is ready to roll. The survey* is to be completed by homeschooling mothers of 6- to 12-year-olds in the states of *Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oregon* No information is requested that could personally identify anyone. We are requesting only state and zip code of residence. Responses to the online questionnaire are dumped anonymously into a database from which no individual can be personally identified. This is a pilot study* involving at this time only the four states of *Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oregon* Please forward this information and link to homeschool families in only these four states. If you homeschool your children and live in *Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oregon* you can complete the survey Online http://jsu.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_3BLtATLAva9aHHu . It is funded by personal donations and $900,000 more is needed to complete the study. You may donate here https://ssl.charityweb.net/genrescue/index.htm?DonorIntent=Vaccinated%20Unvaccinated%20Study This is the first study that should have been done by any government agency and pharmaceutical corporation but they are afraid of the results and that is why it has never been done. Possible Adverse Effects from the Flu Vaccine An article in JAMA estimated that 1:4000 will experience an adverse reaction, a lot more than the one in millions that are quoted or written. Reference: JAMA, June 19, 1999 vol. 281, no.21, pg.2132 Vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) – Voluntary reporting system for adverse reaction to vaccines that was formed in 1986 to compensate citizens for injuries. It was set up because the government knows that vaccines can cause injuries and death and considers those results as a necessary sacrifice for the common good. Anyone can report adverse reaction to vaccines including parents, health workers or the one who experienced the adverse reaction. The FDA states that 1% to 10% of all Adverse Reactions are reported. NOTE: Adverse events are compared to doses distributed, not to doses administered, therefor expressed as a percentage of actual administered doses, adverse events could be significantly higher as no one knows how many doses are in storage. At a CDC conference call for 2009-2010 flu season there was 16, 234 adverse reactions to the flu shot. You can multiply that by at least 10 for a more accurate number of adverse reactions (162,340). Of the adverse reactions reported for the flu shot: Again multiply all statistics by at least 10 for a more accurate number. • 46 were fatal • 605 considered non fatal – Ranges from hospitalization to a sore arm or rash etc. • 93 reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) from the swine flu shot. 1:20 is fatal for someone that develops GBS. • 112 reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) from the seasonal flu shot. 1:20 is fatal for someone that develops GBS. • Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) occurs mostly from the flu shot and Hep-B, but can be the result of other vaccines as well. It affects the nervous system and the patient gets ascending paralysis that starts in your feet and goes on up both legs and can reach your 73.
  • 78. diaphragm and are placed on a ventilator or you die. A patient will usually spend 2 days to 6 months in the hospital and usually on a ventilator. In a severe case you may go through months or even years of rehab and may never gain complete function back. The CDC‘s position is that the number affected statistically is insignificant compared to the number of shots administered. But when it happens to you it is very significant. It is also very significant the amount of health care dollars spent to help these victims recover not to mention there personal loss and the economic loss. In the 2009-2010 flu season there was a 125 reported of GBS and 64 were verified to be caused by the flu shot. There were 268 reports of Anaphylaxis and 115 were verified to be caused by the flu shot. The vaccine injury court had 433 injuries filed and 26 deaths=459 claims. 144 were compensated, 43 were dismissed and 272 had pending claims. The average for claims filed that get some kind of compensation is 25%. The vaccine court looks for ways not to admit vaccine(s) caused the injuries and tries every way possible to dismiss every case. Economic & Personal Loss of Just One of Many Adverse Reactions to Vaccines (GBS) A 2004 Study in Neurology, The Official Journal of the American Academy of Neurology stated that ―it costs the U.S., 1.7 billion a year to take care of these GBS patients or $319,000/patient due to vaccine induced GBS and most of the indirect costs were due to premature deaths.‖ If the government & Pharmaceuticals reached their goal of 100% vaccination in the world with 7 billion people that would come out to 1.6/1,000,000 vaccine induced GBS x 7 Billion = 11,200 cases x $319,000 = $3,572,800,000 health care dollars. This can lead to this or to this Adverse Reactions to the Flu Shot: - Painful abscesses, nodules, ulcers, draining lymph nodes. - Flu like symptoms – Induction of fever, muscle and joint pain and headaches. This is a aha moment!! It sounds like the symptoms of Flu! Again pointing out that there is no way to assess or measure if the virus is dead. - Anaphylaxis(shock), Hives, Vasculitis, Systemic toxicity to tissues and organs - Immune suppression leaving you more susceptible to acquiring disease. - Induction of autoimmune arthritis and other autoimmune disorders - Carcenogenesis (causing cancer), - Teratogenesis (associated with birth defects) and Abortogenesis (causing abortions) - Local or acute inflammation including encephalitis (inflammation of the brain) causing all types of neurological disease including autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD) Reference: Expert Review of Vaccines in 2003: Kenney RT, Edleman, R. ―Survey of human-use adjuvants.‖ Expert Review of Vaccines, (2003) p. 171 74.
  • 79. Deaths from the flu in children 5 and under. 1999=25, 2000=19, 2001=13, 2002=12 and 2003 when the CDC started recommending the flu vaccine to young children rose to 90 deaths and in 2006=78 Deaths, 2007=88 deaths, 2008=116 deaths (40.9% vaccinated at age 6 months to 23 months). Remember only 1%-10% of all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. Reference: National Vital Statistics Report CDC 1 in 50 In a letter from Tina Cheatham, of the US Health Resources Services Administration (HRSA) on May 05, 2008 states to CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkission; Hi Sharyl, Here are the numbers of compensable cases for encephalitis/encephalopathy and seizures in our database from October 1, 1988 to March 4, 2008. Encephalitis/Encephalopathy 611 Seizure Disorders 711 Total 1,322 ―The government has never compensated, nor has it ever been ordered to compensate, any case based on a determination that autism was actually caused by vaccines. We have compensated cases in which children exhibited an encephalopathy, or general brain disease. Encephalopathy may be accompanied by a medical progression of an array of symptoms including autistic behavior, autism, or seizures.‖ WOW! More play with words. Reference: http://childhealthsafety.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/attkisson-cbs-hrsa-emailexchanges-autistic-conditions-vaccines.pdf In a recently published December 13th 2012 vaccine court ruling, hundreds of thousands of dollars were awarded to Ryan Mojabi, whose parents described how ―MMR vaccinations‖, caused a ―severe NOTE! As of March 20, 2013 the CDC and debilitating injury to his brain, diagnosed as Autism Spectrum Disorder (‗ASD‘).‖ has announced 1 in 50 now have ASD. Reference: Later the same month, the government suffered a second major defeat when young Emily Moller http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.h from Houston won compensation following a vaccine-related brain injury that, once again, tml involved MMR and resulted in autism. 75.
  • 80. The cases follow similar successful petitions in the Italian and US courts (including Hannah Poling, Bailey Banks, Misty Hyatt, Kienan Freeman, Valentio Bocca and Julia Grimes) in which the governments conceded or the court ruled that vaccines had caused brain injury. In turn, this injury led to an ASD diagnosis. MMR vaccine was the common denominator in these cases. In June, 2012 an Italian court ruled that the MMR caused autism in a Italian boy and awarded his family £140,000 and could be awarded £800,000 more for punitive damages. Reference: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2160054/MMR-A-mothers-victory-The-vastmajority-doctors-say-link-triple-jab-autism-Italian-court-case-reignite-controversial-debate.html Two more cases in the U.S. were awarded millions for vaccines causing autism. A 10 year old California boy named Ryan regressed into Autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) after receiving the MMR on December 19, 2003. Emily developed ASD, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise Specific (PDD-NOS) after receiving her vaccination consisting of 8 vaccines at the age of 15 months. Reference: http://www.naturalnews.com/038858_vaccine_court_autistic_children_damaged.html The Gov‘t, pharmaceuticals dismiss and deny that vaccines contribute to the growing rate of Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Read the Article Inflammation linked to autism and Vaccines http://vactruth.com/2013/03/23/autism-and-vaccines/ Monkeys given Vaccines develop Autism like symptoms http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_2ZSf_nTIA DO VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6S1-LgYyjQg – Must Watch Video! Explaining how the vaccine court stacks the odds against you of winning your case for a vaccine injury and how the same human and health department who recommends vaccines to your child also owns patents on vaccines. In other words putting their profit ahead of your child‘s health and welfare. http://www.vacinfo.org/researchers.htm - VIC (Vaccine Information Coalition). Research on vaccines 76.
  • 81. How you can effectively protect yourself from the flu and influenza like illness (ILI), decrease your chance of different cancers by up to 60% strengthen your immunity and protect yourself from heart disease Vitamin D3(cholecalciferol)- Optimizing your vitamin D3 levels is one of the absolute best strategies for avoiding infections of ALL kinds, and vitamin D deficiency may actually be the true culprit behind the seasonality of the flu – not the flu virus itself. This is probably the single most important and least expensive action you can take. Regularly monitor your vitamin D3 levels to confirm your levels are within the therapeutic range of 50-70 ng/ml. Optimum levels of D3 can prevent up to 600,000 cases of cancer/year (breast, Colon, Lung and Prostate) and over 1,000,000 preventable diseases around the world. Up to 90% of seniors and 70% of the U.S. population is deficient. Vitamin D3 controls 10% (2,000-2,500 genes) of the human genome. When levels of D3 are sufficient in the blood serum your overall health is improved dramatically. What really causes an outbreak of the flu? According to a Norwegian study, vitamin D has an antibiotic effect on the immune system. The study claims that a vitamin D deficiency is likely to blame for the flu epidemic in Norway. The winter months are when there is a significantly lower level of vitamin D in the population due to inadequate solar radiation. Flu epidemics trigger a steep rise in infection and mortality rates as exposure to sunlight diminishes. In the winter season, when vitamin D deficiency is at its highest, mortality rates are 600 times higher than during summer time Good science is suppressed by the mainstream media Professor Johan Moan stated; ―Vitamin D acts as an antibiotic and strengthens the immune system. UV radiation exposure stimulates the production of vitamin D in the skin. In the winter months, when the sun‘s zenith is too low in the sky for vitamin D synthesis to take place, the body‘s vitamin D level drops, as a result of which its protective effect is unable to fully develop.‖ Scientists, at the University of Oslo, examined data on flu epidemics from Sweden, Norway, the United States, Singapore and Japan. They discovered a direct correlation between infection and mortality rates and low vitamin D levels. Your risk for sickness and death rises as your vitamin D level drops! Reference: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-gottlieb/the-easiest-way-to-preven_b_651576.html Reference: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/255604.php 77.
  • 82. The best way to obtain vitamin D3 is to let your body manufacture it from the suns UV B rays by exposing large amounts of your skin daily to the point that your skin turns slightly pink. There is much more info required to sunbathe correctly so I will limit my focus on Vitamin D3 Supplement. Published cases of toxicity, for which serum levels and dose are known, all involve intake of ≥ 40,000 IU (1000 mcg) per day. Two different cases involved intake of over 2,000,000 IU per day - both men survived. These values for 25(OH)D are as follows: Toxicity threshold level - 200-250 ng/mL (500-750 nmol/L). Upper limit - 100 ng/mL (250 nmol/L). It is very difficult to become toxic on vitamin D3 but these are the signs you want to watch out for: nausea, vomiting, poor appetite, constipation (possibly alternating with diarrhea), weakness, weight loss, tingling sensations in the mouth, confusion and heart rhythm abnormalities. The immediate symptoms of vitamin D overdose are: abdominal cramps, nausea and vomiting. In order to obtain the most benefits from D3 (85% sre deficient in D3) their must be cofactors present like Magnesium glycinate or Magnesium citrate, (79% of Americans are deficient in Magnesium) Vitamin K2, Zinc and Boron. Daily dosage for Vitamin D3 taken with a meal with fat in healthy children under the age of 1 years – 1,000 IU, healthy children over the age of 1 years – 1,000 IU per every 25 lbs. of body weight, healthy adults and adolescents – at least 5,000 IU, pregnant and lactating mothers - at least 6,000 IU. You want to have a D3 blood serum test called 25-hydroxyvitamin D or 25(OH)D done 3 months after starting supplementation to evaluate your D3 blood serum levels so you can adjust your D3 dosage . Do not use the other D3 test called 1,25(OH), it is not as accurate. Most Adults need 8,000 IU‘s of D3/day, 100 IU of K2{MK-7 (menaquinone-7)} /1,000 IU of D3, 264-470 mg of Magnesium glycinate, Zinc and Boron. WARNING! There is no way to know if the above recommendations are correct. The ONLY way to know is to test your blood. You might need 4-5 times the amount recommended above. Ideally your blood level of 25 OH D should be 50-70 ng/ml. To treat cancer and Heart Disease 70-100 ng/ml. Reference - http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/12/16/vitamin-k2.aspx Vitamin D Testing Kit - http://shop.mercola.com/catalog/vitamin-d-test-kit,189,0.htm $65 WARNING! People with the following conditions should only take vitamin D3 with the guidance of a knowledgeable physician: primary hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis, granulomatous TB, some cancers. Medications that interfere with utilization of vitamin D3 are: Steroids - impair vitamin D metabolism, contributing to bone loss and development of osteoporosis. 78.
  • 83. Xenical®, alli™, Questran®, LoCholest®, and Prevalite® - reduce vitamin D absorption and Dilantin®- increases hepatic metabolism of vitamin D to inactive compounds. Vitamin K-2 specifically MK-7 (menaquinone-7) is longer-chain forms found in fermented foods and is a much preferred form of K-2 because it stays in your body longer, and it has a longer half-life, which means you can just take it once a day in very convenient dosing The other form of K-2 MK-4 (menaquinone-4), is a short-chain form of vitamin K2 found in butter, egg yolks, and animal-based foods. The main function of K-2 is to remove the calcium from where it does not belong as in arteries which can cause atherosclerosis, hardening of the arteries and placing it where it belongs in the bones. Vitamin K2 works synergistically with D3 and will help prevent D3 toxicity. Preliminary evidence indicates a protective role for vitamin K in the following: arterial calcification, atherogenesis, and cardiovascular disease, bone loss and fractures, prostate cancer, liver cancer, lung cancer, leukemia and Alzheimer's. There is no known toxicity levels and K2 is not stored in your body like D3. Vitamin K2and D3 must be taken daily. In 2000 the National Academy of Sciences established the following adequate Intake (AI) levels for vitamin K2: children under 1 years: 2- 2.5 mcg, children 1-3 years: 30 mcg, children 4-13 years: 55-60 mcg, adolescents 14-18 years: 75 mcg, adult males: 120 mcg, adult females: 90 mcg and pregnant or lactating females: 75-90 mcg Reference: http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/about-vitamin-d/vitamin-d-deficiency/ Reference: http://www.naturalnews.com/042438_magnesium_vitamin_D_disease_protection.html#ixzz2hRwFGnj0 Vitamin D is 800% more effective at preventing the flu than the flu vaccine – The results are from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 334 children, half of which were given 1200 IUs per day of vitamin D3. In other words, this was a "rigorous" scientific study meeting the gold standard of scientific evidence. In the study, while 31 of 167 children in the placebo group contracted influenza over the four month duration of the study, only 18 of 168 children in the vitamin D group did. This means vitamin D was responsible for an absolute reduction of nearly 8%. Flu vaccines, according to the latest scientific evidence, achieve a 1% reduction in influenza symptoms. Reference: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Am J Clin Nutr (March 10, 2010). doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.29094) Other steps to take to strengthen your immune system: • Optimize Your Gut Flora - This may be the single most important strategy you can implement as the bacteria in your gut have enormous control of your immune response. The best way to improve your beneficial bacteria ratio is to avoid sugars as they will feed the pathogenic bacteria. Additionally, processed foods and most grains should be limited and replacing with healthy fats like coconut oil. The best probiotics available http://nwcnaturals.com/?gclid=COS5ib2GsrcCFU1p7AodIWoAeA • Chlorella Super food – Purchase Cleanest chlorella in the world http://store.naturalnews.com/Chlorella_c_51.html All other organic chlorella contains arsenic, mercury, lead, aluminum etc. due to environmental pollution. Lab results http://www.naturalnews.com/040466_clean_chlorella_heavy_metals_lab_tests.html 79.
  • 84. oil (Many Health benefits http://www.tropicaltraditions.com/ ) avocados, olives, olive oil, butter, eggs and nuts. Once you change your diet, then regular use of fermented foods like fermented soy (Natto) can radically optimize the function of your immune response. AVOID HYDROGENATED FATS • Avoid Sugar and Processed Foods - Sugar suppresses your immune response almost immediately, and a healthy immune system is one of the most important keys to fighting off viruses and other illness. Sugar decimates your beneficial bacteria in your gut and feed the pathogenic yeast and viruses. Be aware that sugar (AVOID high fructose corn syrup) is present in foods you may not suspect, like ketchup and fruit juice. If you are healthy then sugar can be consumed in limit quantities (NEVER CORN SYRUP OR SYNTHETIC SUGARS) but the LAST thing you should be eating when you are sick is sugar. AVOID ALL SUGAR, AVOID ALL CORN SYRUP. Very damaging! (high fructose corn syrups and crystalline corn syrup found in vitamin water! AVOID ALL SYNTHETIC SUGARS . Very Damaging! (Sucralose (Splenda), Saccharin (Sweet‗ N Low, Sugar Twin), Aspartame (NutraSweet and Equal-the most dangerous of all synthetic sugars), Neotame has a similar chemical composition to Aspartame, Acesulfame K (Sunett or Sweet One). Sorbitol, mannitol are sugar alcohols that occur naturally in fruits and are commercially made for use as sweeteners. There are two sweetening alternatives. PURE STEVIA EXTRACT from the STEVIA plant at http://www.sweetleaf.com/ and http://www.onlysweet.com/? or JUST LIKE SUGAR Independent lab studies show there are no excitotoxins like L-glutamate, Dglutamate and aspartic acid and its sweetness is equal to that of real sugar. Importantly, there is no aftertaste. To learn more and to get the product, go to www.justlikesugarinc.com Do not use whole leaf Stevia. Stay away from Truvia, PureVia as they are not pure stevia. Reference: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/20/sugar-dangers.aspx Reference: http://nutritionwonderland.com/2009/02/stevia-controversy/ • Get Plenty of Rest - It is more difficult for your body to fight off disease if you are tired. • Address Stress - Try the Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) and/or exercise. http://www.emofree.com/ • Regularly Exercise - When you exercise, you increase your circulation and your blood flow throughout your body. The components of your immune system are also better circulated, which means your immune system has a better chance of finding an illness before it spreads. Be sure to stay hydrated – drink plenty of fluids, especially water. Dramatically reduce the intensity of exercise when you are not feeling well. • Take a High-Quality Source of Animal-Based Omega-3 Fats - Increase your intake of healthy and essential fats like the omega-3 found in krill oil or distilled fish oil (1,200-2,400 mg of EPA/DHA per day) http://www.swansonvitamins.com/now-foods-omega-3molecularly-distilled-500-sgels for only $17.49 for 500 Soft Gels to increase B- cell activity which decreases inflammation and increases immune response. It is also vitally important to avoid damaged omega-6 oils that are trans fats and in processed foods as it will seriously damage your immune response. Improve the ratio of omega-6:omega-3 to as close to a 1:1 ratio will reduce skin cancer dramatically. Omega -6 fats found in animal fats were found to increase incidence of skin cancer and increases of omega-3 (fish oil or superior krill oil) was found to reduce skin cancer. Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23180828 Reference: http://www.jleukbio.org/content/93/4/463 Reference: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130401111545.htm Reference: http://www.naturalnews.com/039954_omega-3_influenza_defense.html 80.
  • 85. • • • • • • • • • • • • • Wash Your Hands - Washing your hands regularly will decrease your likelihood of spreading a virus to your nose, mouth or other people. Be sure you don't use antibacterial soap for this. Antibacterial soaps are completely unnecessary, and they cause far more harm than good. Hygiene Measures - Cover your mouth and nose when you cough or sneeze. If possible, avoid close contact with those, who are sick and, if you are sick, avoid close contact with those who are well. Use Natural Antibiotics - Examples include oil of oregano and garlic. These work like broad-spectrum antibiotics against bacteria, viruses, and protozoa in your body. And unlike pharmaceutical antibiotics, they do not appear to lead to resistance. The higher the carvacrol concentration, the more effective it is. Carvacrol is the most active antimicrobial agent in oregano oil. Avoid Dairy products – Dairy products often create mucus in the nose, sinuses and throat which gives bacteria and viruses an ideal medium to grown on. Avoid Hospitals - Try to stay away from hospitals unless you're having an emergency and need expert medical care, as hospitals are prime breeding grounds for infections of all kinds. The best place to get plenty of rest and recover from illness that is not life-threatening is usually in the comfort of your own home. Hawaiian Spirulina – A super food with lots of vitamins, minerals, protein, enzymes. Replaces 5 fruits or 5 vegetable with 1 teaspoon/day. 755 servings (two years) for $176.99 http://www.nutrex-hawaii.com/estore/hawaiian-spirulina-powder-5lb-bulk-bag Astaxanthin – The most potent free radical scavenger (antioxidant) available that protects eyesight and every other area in your body. 12 mg/day. $39.99/50 gel caps. http://www.nutrex-hawaii.com/estore/bioastin-hawaiian-astaxanthin-12mg-50-gelcaps 5-Day Bowel Detox, Liver Detox and Kidney Detox - The Best available and it works. What I use. Always do a bowel cleanse followed by the other two cleanses. If you have high cholesterol do a liver cleanse as a priority after Bowel cleanse. https://www.herbdoc.com/index.php?option=com_oscommerce&Itemid=42&lang=en&gclid=CN258va8orcCFSoV7AodoxoAJg&c=1 Sprouts, a DIY Super food - Sprouts are important to optimize your health, as they are an oft-ignored powerhouse of nutrition. They can contain up to 30 times the nutrition of organic vegetables grown in your own garden, and allow your body to extract more vitamins, minerals, amino acids and essential fats from the foods you eat. http://www.handypantry.com/ Support for cell regeneration Powerful sources of antioxidants, minerals, vitamins and enzymes that protect against free radical damage Alkalinizing effect on your body, which is thought to protect against disease, including cancer (as many tumors are acidic) Abundantly rich in oxygen, which can also help protect against abnormal cell growth, viruses and bacteria that cannot survive in an oxygen-rich environment If you do come down with a influenza like illness (ILI) immediately try the following: • Zinc - According to a Cochrane Database Review of the medical research on zinc, when taken within one day of the first symptoms, zinc can cut down the duration of a cold by about 24 hours. It was also found to greatly reduce the severity of symptoms. 81.
  • 86. • Chicken soup - Chicken contains a natural amino acid called cysteine, which can thin the mucus in your lungs and make it less sticky so you can expel it more easily. For best results, make up a fresh batch yourself (or ask a friend or family member to do so) and make the soup hot and spicy with plenty of pepper. The spices will trigger a sudden release of watery fluids in your mouth, throat, and lungs, which will help thin down the respiratory mucus so it's easier to cough up and expel. I would also strongly recommend using local pastured chicken and simmering the bones (and the feet if available) for 24 hours to get the most you can out of the chicken. It makes an absolutely heavenly soup. Drink Plenty of filtered or Distilled water – ½ your weight in ounces/day. Ex. 150 lbs. drink 75 oz. or 9 1/2 (8oz.) cups of water. • Mushrooms - While most people think only of eating the fleshy fruiting body of the mushroom (the part that grows above ground), most of the benefits are actually located in their complex root structure, called the mycelium. Beta glucans and proteoglycans are the primary biologically active compounds in the mushroom fruit body and mycelia that support your immune system. The beta glucans are special proteins with unique side-branching patterns that "fit" perfectly with cellular receptor sites that support your immune system, just like a key in a lock. • Mushrooms also contain trace minerals, polysaccharides, amino acids and fiber that support your health by protecting against environmental stressors; supporting your detoxification process; and promoting healthy gut flora and optimal digestion, just to name a few of the known health benefits. • Vitamin C - A very potent antioxidant; use a natural form such as acerola, which contains associated micronutrients. You can take several grams every hour till you are better unless you start developing loose stools • Oregano Oil - The higher the carvacrol concentration, the more effective it is. Carvacrol is the most active antimicrobial agent in oregano oil. • Propolis - A bee resin and one of the most broad-spectrum antimicrobial compounds in the world; propolis is also the richest source of caffeic acid and apigenin, two very important compounds that aid in immune response. • A tea made from a combination of elderflower, yarrow, boneset, linden, peppermint and ginger - drink it hot and often for combating a cold or flu. It causes you to sweat, which is helpful for eradicating a virus from your system. • Olive leaf extract - Ancient Egyptians and Mediterranean cultures used it for a variety of health-promoting uses and it is widely known as a natural, non-toxic immune system builder. Organic Ginger Homemade Chicken Soup 82.
  • 87. With the objection of many psychiatrists and healthcare workers, the criteria of Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) may be changing in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM5). The new criteria is meant to redefine autism and in doing so will eliminate up to 50% of autistic defined children as we know it today , eliminating the help and financial assistance these children will need for the rest of there lives. They will lose their diagnosis, healthcare, special education services and medical services. This is an artificial way to lower the ever rising numbers of autistic children and to reduce the growing financial and economic burden. According to Autism Speaks ―The costs of providing care for each person with autism affected by intellectual disability through his or her lifespan are $2.3 million in the U.S. and £1.5 million ($2.4 million) in the U.K. The lifetime costs of caring for individuals who are not impacted by intellectual disability are $1.4 million in the U.S. and £917,000 in the U.K. (equivalent to $1.46 million).‖ The annual cost of autism had tripled to a whopping $126 billion in the USA and £34 billion in the UK last year. In a study ―Evidence of parallels between mercury intoxication and the brain pathology in autism.‖ from the Institute of Chronic Illnesses in Maryland, lead researcher Janet K. Kern has identified nearly two dozen metabolic and systemic changes that occur inside the body as a result of mercury intoxication that parallel Autism, including inflammation of the brain, intracellular degeneration, mitochondrial dysfunction, decreased blood flow to the brain, and pathological changes of blood vessels. Thimerosal is 49.6% ethyl mercury. According to Blakemore-Brown, it is a ―highly toxic poison that is both genotoxic and neurotoxic. It collects in the brain and organs such as the kidneys and interferes with our DNA, which can affect our brain and immune system. She attributes the huge increase in autism to thimerosal.‖ 83.
  • 88. I had the opportunity to witness first hand how media puts out false information along with the FDA and CDC. In February of 2013 NBC Nightly News did a piece on the whooping cough (Pertussis) and in the report they used a graph that started in the year the vaccine was introduced. (1948). If you did not know any better you would think that the whooping cough was eliminated by the vaccine. I quickly matched the graph with the graph in my book and it was accurate but did not go back far enough to show that pertussis was well on its way out before the vaccine was introduced. In 2010 the Supreme court heard the case of Bruesewitz v. Wyeth (a Pharmaceutical) on whether the 1986 law leaves open the possibility that patients can sue manufacturers when the side effects were avoidable. The Obama administration joined Wyeth, acquired in 2009 by New York-based Pfizer, in urging the justices to bar those types of suits. In March 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) agreed to hear Bruesewitz v. Wyeth. The case involves Hannah Bruesewitz, who was born in 1991. Hannah received the first three shots of DPT, and after the third injection developed seizures. The parents presented a claim in Vaccine Court, but lost. Remember the vaccine courts tries every way possible to dismiss a case. The parents decided to sue in PA state court for what they argued was a preventable injury due to a ―design defect‖ in the vaccine. Even though the federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for the vaccine manufacturer in the case, concluding that the legislative history of the NCVIA indicated a clear intent by Congress to preclude suing for claims of preventable injuries due to poor design, the case went to the Supreme Court. National vaccine Injury Acts of 1986 states: ―No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side-effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.‖ According to vaccine safety advocate Louise Kuo Habakus, ―The Court is telling parents that they‘re on their own. Parents know that 4 out of 5 cases of vaccine injury do not get compensation in the misnamed Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The Supreme Court has slammed the courthouse doors shut.‖ Because the federal government recommends 70 doses of 16 ―unavoidably unsafe‖ vaccines, and states compel 30-45 doses for school attendance, this issue affects all children. Lets recap what this means. On Feb. 22, 2011 ―The Supreme court ruled that Americans do not have the right to sue vaccine manufacturers for injuries that are the result of defective design. ―No other product is shielded from lawsuits based on design defects.‖ The pharmaceuticals only incentive ―law suits‖ for trying to improve the safety and efficacy of vaccines was effectively thrown out. 84.
  • 89. Reference: http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_audio_detail.aspx?argument=09-152 listen to the oral argument Reference: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf The Secretive Meeting in June 2000, ―The Simpsonwood Documents‖ If you are still skeptical about the dangers of vaccination you must read the ―The Simpsonwood Document‖ that was obtained through the freedom of information act. The official title of the meeting was the ―Scientific Review of Vaccine Safety Data link Information.‖ This SECRET conference, held on June 7-8, 2000, at Simpsonwood Retreat Center in Nor-cross, Georgia, assembled 51 scientists and physicians, from the FDA, CDC, WHO and Pharmaceuticals. Five represented vaccine manufacturers. These included Smith Kline Beecham, Merck, Wyeth, North American Vaccine and Aventis Pasteur. At the meeting the scientists discussed the dangers of mercury (thimerosal) and Autism in vaccination and admitting that 12.5 mcg‘s of thimerosal (Mercury) causes ADHD & ADD. Thimerosal was reduced and/or removed from many vaccines in 2001 but 25 mcg are still in multi-dose vials of Fluzone and High Dose Fluzone for 65 and older, all swine flu (H1N1), Afluria, Fluvirin, FluLaval, multidose Meningococcal ((Menomune A, C, AC and A/C/Y/W-135), TT & DT. Trace amount (< 0.3mcg) in DT (Sanofi), TD (Decavac) and DTaP(Tripedia). Updated 4/1/2013 Dr. Viera Scheibner, a retired principal research scientist with a doctorate in natural sciences, has been speaking on the dangers of vaccination since 1985. Dr. Scheibner has published three books and 90 scientific papers in prestigious scientific journals on the subject. Australian researcher Viera Scheibner, PhD, after investigating some 60,000 pages of medical literature on vaccination, summarized it: "Immunizations, including those practiced on babies, not only did not prevent any infectious diseases; they caused more suffering and more deaths than has any other human activity in the entire history of medical intervention." following are some excerpts from the 260 page document: Dr. Johnston, pg. 15 & 19-20: (Chair of the meeting and a pediatrician-immunologist at the University of Colorado): “Thimerosal is cleaved (in the body) into ethylmercury and thiosalicylate which is inactive… The data on its toxicity (shows) it can cause neurologic and renal toxicity, including death.” 85.
  • 90. “It is particularly a concern in multi-dose vials because of the issue of re-entry multiple times in the vials, and it is also important in the manufacturing process for a number of vaccine including inactivated influenza and some of the earlier DPT vaccine, and is a constituent of all DPT vaccines, but not all DTAP vaccines.” “There are three licensed preservative in the United States, Thimerosal, ethyl and phenol. We won't talk about the other two today, but I thought I should mention them. Thimerosal is the most active and it has been utilized in vaccines since the 1930's.” “Acutely, it can cause neurologic and renal toxicity, including death, from overdose…” Dr. Verstraeten, pg. 31: “It is sort of interesting that when I first came to the CDC as a NIS officer a year ago only, I didn’t really know what I wanted to do, but one of the things I knew I didn’t want to do was studies that had to do with toxicology or environmental health. Now it turns out that other people also thought that this study was not the right thing to do, so what I will present to you is the study that nobody thought we should do.” Dr. Bernier, pg. 113: "We have asked you to keep this information confidential. We do have a plan for discussing these data at the upcoming meeting of the Advisory Committee of Immunization Practices on June 21 and June 22. At that time CDC plans to make a public release of this information*, so I think it would serve all of our interests best if we could continue to consider these data. The ACIP work group will be considering also. If we could consider these data in a certain protected environment. So we are asking people who have a great job protecting this information up until now, to continue to do that until the time of the ACIP meeting. So to basically consider this embargoed information. That would help all of us to use the machinery that we have in place for considering these data and for arriving at policy recommendations.“ Dr. Robert Johnson, Immunologist, University of Colorado pg. 200 “Forgive this personal comment, but I got called out at eight o’clock for an emergency call and my daughter-in-law delivered a son by c-section. Our first male in the line of the next generation and I do not want that grandson to get a Thimerosal containing vaccine until we know better what is going on. It will probably take a long time. In the meantime, and I know there are probably implications for this internationally, but in the meanwhile I think I want that grandson to only be given Thimerosal-free vaccines.” Dr. William Weil, American Academy of Pediatrics on pg. 207.“…the number of dose related relationships [between mercury and autism] are linear and statistically significant. You can play with this all you want. They are linear. They are statistically significant.” Dr. John Clements, World Health Organization on pg. 248 “But there is now the point at which the research results have to be handled, and even if this committee decides that there is no association and that information gets out, the work has been done and through the freedom of information that will be taken by others and will be used in other ways beyond the control of this group. And I am very concerned about that as I suspect that it is already too late to do anything regardless of any professional body and what they say…My mandate as I sit here in this group is to make sure at the end of the day that 100,000,000 are immunized with DTP, Hepatitis B and if possible Hib, this year, next year and for many years to come, and that will have to be with thimerosal containing vaccines unless a miracle occurs and an alternative is found quickly and is tried and found to be safe.” 86.
  • 91. [*This never happened. SafeMind.org obtained this transcript via the Freedom of Information Act. Data published later were diluted into insignificance by including additional data from an HMO that had very uncharacteristic results] One of the best reviews of this large government document ―Simpsonwood document‖ was written by Dr. Russel Blaylock, a neurosurgeon and researcher. This is a must read for everyone to fully comprehend the seriousness and gravity of the lies and the cover up the government wants us to believe. Reference: http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/2.6.pdf condensed from 260 pages to 24 pages (larger print) and Reference: http://www.vacinfo.org/man1714_1726.pdf condensed from 260 pages to13 pages (smaller print) Read for yourself the 286 page document obtained though the FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT at Reference: http://www.safeminds.org/government-affairs/foia/Simpsonwood_Transcript.pdf For the complete story with many supporting documents and to read the perpetrators own words on the VACCINE COVERUP Reference: http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/index2.html Other information on the Simpsonwood Documents: • http://www.autismhelpforyou.com/Simpsonwood_And_Puerto%20%20Rico.htm Plus Many Excellent Links and info. on vaccination • http://www.aapsonline.org/vaccines/cdcfdaexperts.htm • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpPW0lV0WbU • http://vactruth.com/2012/01/02/aluminum-fda-got-it-all-wrong/ Even though mercury gets most of the attention, Aluminum is just as deadly and dangerous. Read this article on Aluminum! 87.
  • 92. Conflicts of Interest (COI) on US and Australian Government Vaccine Advisory Boards (Krimsky 2003) Representatives on government vaccine advisory boards in both the USA and Australia have many conflicts of interest (COI) with industry and are still allowed to participate in policy-decisions made by these boards. The government regulators for medicines/vaccines in these countries (US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)) are 100% funded by the industries whose drugs they license for public use and monitor for safety in the population. This is called a User-Pay or CostRecovery System. The decision making boards in these organizations are dominated by industry representatives. Here is a link to the TGA‘s industry working group (IWG) with all 17 members representing TGA sponsors yet the TGA is the government body that protects the public interest in health issues http://www.tga.gov.au/about/tga-bpi-pm-bpr-iwg.htm#meetings . An investigation in 1999 – 2000 of the Federal US vaccine policy advisory committees revealed the endemic nature of COI within these bodies (Committee on Government Reform in Krimsky 2003). The investigation revealed that within these policy-making committees the COI rules were weak and rarely enforced. Members with significant COI were given waivers to participate in committee proceedings. It was found that the 2 main advisory boards developing government policy on vaccines – the ACIP and the VRBPAC – were dominated by representatives with close financial ties to vaccine producers. The investigation found that both the CDC and FDA allow members to vote on vaccine recommendations even when they have significant financial ties to drug companies and can make large profits from the decisions that are made. An Example of the COI‘s An example of the endemic nature of COI is provided with the approval process for Rotavirus vaccine in 1998. In critical discussions regarding the approval of the new rotavirus vaccine, members of the ACIP who had COI were granted waivers for the entire year – regardless of the nature of the COI. Out of the 8 members of the CDC‘s ACIP committee, who supported the vaccine‘s inclusion on the childhood schedule, 4 had direct financial interests with the vaccine manufacturers. On the FDA‘s VRBPAC committee there were 5 fulltime FDA committee members who voted for the approval of the vaccine and 3 of these had financial ties to either Wyeth Lederle (the manufacturer of the vaccine) or the other companies who were developing competitor vaccines. A summary of the nature of conflicts of interest on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) boards and the Centre for Disease‘s Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine advisory boards include (Krimsky 2003 p.95 - 100): • Members of the FDA and CDC advisory committees who make policy decisions own stock in drug companies that make vaccines. • Representatives on both advisory committees can own patents for vaccines that are under consideration for licensure or for recommendation on the national schedule of vaccines. 88.
  • 93. • The CDC grants conflict of interest waivers to every member of their advisory committee a year at a time and allows full participation in the discussions leading up to a vote by every member, whether they have a financial stake in the decision or not. • In the early 2000‘s the CDC‘s advisory committee had no public members – no community member‘s, whose only interest is health, has a vote on whether a vaccine belongs on the childhood immunization schedule or not. • The FDA‘s committee in 2000 had only one public member and this individual received travel expenses and honoraria from Merck. • The FDA is also 100% funded by the companies whose products the agency approves and monitors for safety – a User-Pay system. Some examples of the substantial ties members of the ACIP had to pharmaceutical companies when the rotovirus vaccine was being considered included a member with 600 shares in Merck worth $33,800 and another member, Paul Offit, who shared the patent on a competitor rotavirus vaccine in development by Merck at the time. Paul Offit is Chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases and Director of the Vaccine Education Centre at the Children‘s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP). He has been a consultant for Merck for many years and this pharmaceutical company finances his research chair ($1.5million) at the Philadelphia hospital. He also received a grant from Merck for $350,000 to work on a rotovirus vaccine against gastroenteritis. This hospital is affiliated with the Medical School at the University of Pennsylvania. As a co-inventor of a rotavirus vaccine for which he was a patent holder, Offit was due to make millions of dollars from a decision to support the approval of the first vaccine made by Wyeth Lederle in 1998. The rotavirus vaccine was approved by the industry dominated committees in 1998, but it led to many children being harmed and was withdrawn from the market in the same year. This led to an investigation in 1999 into the policy-decisions made by the CDC and FDA which was conducted by the US Government Reform Committee (Attkinson 2008). In 2006 when Merck‘s rotavirus vaccine – RotaTeq – was approved by the FDA, Paul Offit received patent rights with his co-inventors Fred Clark and Stanley Plotkin (Olmsted and Blaxill 2011). This entitles them to receive ongoing royalties from the Children‘s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and the Wistar Institute to whom they ceded their inventor rights (Olmsted and Blaxill 2011). These institutes have collaborated in developing this vaccine. Since the 80‘s, when the vaccine was approved by the FDA for the US National Immunization Program (NIP), Offit received millions of dollars in royalties. Yet he had been allowed to participate in the decision-making process for its approval in 1998 while his vaccine was protected by patent and undergoing clinical trials with Merck. When CHOP sold its royalty interest in RotaTeq in 2007 it was worth $182 million (Olmsted and Blaxill 2011). Paul Offit is clearly not a disinterested ‗expert‘ and yet he is the face of the US government‘s advocacy for the safety of vaccines and the debunking of the link between vaccines and autism. 89.
  • 94. In 1999 the US government reform committee investigation found that there were no standards for COI within the FDA and CDC expert advisory committees. Even if a member owned up to $100,000 in stock or was being paid $250,000 a year by the affected company the conflict would be waived. This situation was known in 1992 when the Institute of Medicine called for changes but the recommendations were not acted upon. This indicates that COI have been normalized in these agencies in the process of approving vaccines/drugs. In fact, a new law was added to the ethical guidelines in 1997 that allows the FDA to add official industry representatives to advisory committees. As the COI rules are not enforced in the CDC and FDA, it is clear that policy decisions are not being made by representatives who are non-biased. Board members are making value judgments (opinions) on the welfare of the public which also bring large financial rewards to themselves. This situation can be described as self-serving, nepotism, abuse of power, self-dealing or insider-trading and is a breach of the trust the public has in government regulators (Krimsky 2003). Reference: Krimsky S, 2003, Science in the Private Interest: has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research? Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc, USA. 90.
  • 95. Flu vaccine: all risk with NO Benefit Proven using the pharmaceuticals fuarix vaccine package insert (PI) 91.
  • 96. The Flu Vaccine - Are We Being Fooled? There is an ongoing scandal about whether the flu vaccine is beneficial for any age group. What you need to know: • Flu symptoms have a multitude of causes. • Only 1 to 3% of adults have a type of flu each year that is targeted by flu vaccines. • High values of claimed effectiveness mislead anyone not familiar with incidence statistics. • Expert reviews of the flu vaccine agree that the vaccine has very little if any benefit. • Claims for flu vaccine effectiveness ignore the disease caused by the vaccine in the two weeks following vaccination. • Conclusion: If all the available data from flu vaccine trials is included in effectiveness (efficacy) calculations, flu vaccines show NO effectiveness. Lets walk through this together The statements above are addressed using common knowledge and frequently quoted statistics on yearly flu incidence, followed by an experts review of flu vaccine trials and, finally, trial data from one flu vaccine manufacturer so you may judge for yourself. For the sake of brevity, our study is confined to data from one manufacturer and one age group, adults 18-64. Younger and older age groups experience higher incidence numbers but the same principles and conclusions discussed here apply. The presented data is typical of industry wide methodology and results. What can cause flu symptoms? Typical flu symptoms are fever, chills, muscles aches, weakness, headache, dry cough and sore throat. Fever is the body's immune response to an infection or accumulated toxins. Muscle aches and weakness are the result of toxins moving in the blood stream. Cough and sore throat are associated with a higher than normal body toxin level and constipation. A wide variety of toxins can trigger detoxifying symptoms similar to those associated with the flu. A short list that causes Influenza Like Illness (ILI) includes 200 other viruses and bacteria, food poisoning, pesticides, herbicides, herpes and STDs, some insect and spider bites, chemotherapeutic agents, carbon monoxide, formaldehyde and influenza vaccines and the flu shot does not help with any of these. When specimens from patients with flu symptoms are lab tested to determine the cause of their illness the resulting ―chemical signature‖ usually characterizes an influenza-like illness (ILI). These ILIs have all the symptoms that both laymen and professionals identify as the ―flu.‖ However, only a small percentage of ILIs are true influenza as defined by medical professionals. These defined ―chemical signatures‖ are referred to as clinically-confirmed or culture-confirmed influenza to distinguish them from other ILIs. Each year's flu vaccine targets three now up to four of the many types of culture-confirmed influenza and thus is recognized as ineffective for all other types. 92.
  • 97. How many cases of influenza occur each year in adults aged 18-64 in the USA? Annual ILI incidence is between 15 to 20 percent of the adult population. In a year when both ILI and true influenza have high incidence, about 3% of the population have what medical professionals call cultureConfirmed influenza. In a low incidence year, this number drops to 1%. Since 97 to 99 adults out of 100 are proven to not have cultureconfirmed influenza each year without vaccination, it defies logic to think a vaccine will actually improve natural immunity and reduce the chance of getting the flu. The graph to the right illustrates the same principle as the previous graph, except that here is pictured a low incidence year when only 1 person Out of 100 adults experiences a culture-confirmed case of influenza, the sole target of the vaccine. 93.
  • 98. Misleading Vaccine Effectiveness Claims We frequently hear the claim that ―the flu vaccine reduces the odds of getting the flu by 70% to 90%.‖ However, this claim is based on the appearance of a reduction of between 1 to 3 cases of influenza for each 100 adults. Example: The standard formula for effectiveness yields 67 percent effectiveness when one reduces the number of cases by two out of three. When you hear 70% to 90% do you think the speaker means a reduction of less than 3 cases per 100 vaccine recipients? Expert review warns trial conclusions are often manipulated. or After reviewing available flu vaccine trials, the Cochrane Collaboration concluded, ―Influenza vaccines have a modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms and working days lost. There is no evidence that they affect complications, such as pneumonia, or transmission.‖(1) The review warns ―... reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies. The content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in light of this finding.‖(2) In effect, this professional, industry-independent organization concludes that currently even the best available trial conclusions may be erroneous. We will show that incomplete data is the reason why industry conclusions for flu vaccine effectiveness are incorrect. Dr. Tom Jefferson, a physician based in Rome and the head of the Vaccines Field at the Cochrane Collaboration, a highly respected international network of researchers who appraise medical evidence, is one of the world's best-informed researchers on the flu vaccine. He leads a team of researchers who have examined hundreds of vaccine studies. To quote directly from the article: ―The vast majority of the studies were deeply flawed, says Jefferson. "Rubbish is not a scientific term, but I think it's the term that applies to these studies.‖ Jefferson has called for randomized, placebo-controlled studies of the vaccines Reference: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200911/brownlee-h1n1 But vaccine pushers are resisting these clinical trials! They call the trials "unethical" but, in reality, they know that a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study would reveal the complete failure of flu vaccines, and they will do anything to prevent such a trial from happening. Don't you find it amazing that drug pushers and vaccine advocates claim they have "science" on their side, but they won't submit their vaccines to any real science at all? No placebo-controlled studies have ever been conducted on flu vaccines because the industry says they would be ―unethical.‖ A valid safety study is compares a vaccine with sterile water or normal saline (Placebo) but many vaccine safety studies compare a new vaccine to another vaccine already in use. An example of a invalid unscientific gov‘t study is http://www.nih.gov/news/health/mar2010/niaid-09.htm 94.
  • 99. Vaccine trial conclusions are based on incomplete data. The graphic to the right illustrates the need for complete data to determine if a vaccine is beneficial or not. It is common in influenza vaccine trials to ignore the disease symptoms occurring in the two weeks following vaccination. The zero ILI occurring in the non-vaccinated during the 2 weeks following the start of the vaccination trial is based on the trial beginning before an active flu season. During an offseason month, about 1 patient in 200 that walks into a doctors office has the symptoms of an ILI. That's 1in 200 patients, not 1 in 200 of the general public who constitute the 1000 non-vaccinated control group. During the example 7 month monitoring period, 150 ILI occur in the vaccinated versus 170 ILI in the non-vaccinated a difference of 20 or 12%. The difference between 32 culture-confirmed influenza cases in the non-vaccinated and 12 culture-confirmed influenza cases (62.5% less) in the vaccinated is even more dramatic and will form the basis for advertised effectiveness. However, note 50 ILI that occurred in the vaccinated in the two weeks following vaccination were ignored when calculating effectiveness. 150 plus 50 is 200 total ILI in the vaccinated versus only 170 in the non-vaccinated for the whole season. Vaccine package inserts are one source of vaccine trial data. Package inserts, also known as prescribing information (PI), Are published by each vaccine's manufacturer. Table 4 (right) and Table 1 (below) are from the PI for Fluarix, a GlaxoSmithKline flu vaccine, copyright 2012.(3) In Table 4, (right) under ―Attack Rates‖for ―All Culture-Confirmed Influenza (Matched, Unmatched, and Untyped)‖ we see a 1.2% influenza attack rate for Fluarix recipients and a 3.2% attack rate for placebo recipients. This claim means two fewer flu cases per 100 vaccinated adults. A typical flu lasts 7 days, therefore 14 fewer days of flu symptoms are alleged to be suffered by each 100 Fluarix recipients compared to 100 placebo recipients. This alleged benefit will be true only if all adverse events were recorded and included in the calculation of benefit. Ignored data is examined next. 95.
  • 100. Do vaccine recipients suffer less than non-vaccinated? According to the PI, test participants were ―... monitored for influenza-like illnesses (ILI) starting 2 weeks post-vaccination and lasting for approximately 7 months.‖(4) Table 1 (below) lists Solicited Local Adverse reactions. Fluarix recipients had 11% higher rates of muscle aches than did placebo recipients in just four days following vaccination.. Hmm, muscle aches, could that be the flu? Excess adverse events in vaccine recipients versus placebo recipients must be subtracted from the alleged benefits list in Table 4. The 11% muscle aches occur a minimum of 11 days and reduce the alleged 14-day benefit of the flu vaccine to 3 days. 96.
  • 101. More Adverse Events In addition to Table 1 (previous page), there were unsolicited adverse events recorded within the first 21days following vaccination. Found on page 4 of the package insert, "Unsolicited adverse events that occurred in ≥1% of recipients of FLUARIX and at a rate greater than placebo included: Fluarix versus Placebo • upper respiratory tract infection (3.9% versus 2.6%) • nasopharyngitis (2.5% versus 1.6%), • nasal congestion (2.2% versus 2.1%), • diarrhea (1.6% versus 0%), • influenza-like illness (1.6% versus 0.5%), • vomiting (1.4% versus 0%),and • dysmenorrhea (1.3% versus 1.0%).‖(5) Five of the 7 unsolicited adverse events listed above – Nasopharyngitis, nasal congestion, diarrhea, vomiting and dysmenorrhea total 9% versus the placebo 4.7% (9 - 4.7 = 4.3), an excess of 4.3%. This is a minimum of 4 more days of misery equal in intensity to flu symptoms to be subtracted from the remaining 3 day of alleged vaccine benefit. ―Benefit‖ total (3 - 4 = -1) is now less than zero showing that the vaccine is harmful rather than beneficial. There are two remaining adverse reactions. Upper respiratory tract infection was 1.3% greater in the Fluarix vaccinated versus placebo. Likewise, influenza-like illness was 1.1% greater in the vaccinated versus placebo. These two adverse events are similar to clinicallyconfirmed influenza that averages 7 days in duration. The excess of 2.4% (1.1 + 1.3 = 2.4) is bigger than the claimed 2% ―benefit‖ in Table 1 of the PI. We cannot subtract the full 2.4% because these ―unsolicited adverse events‖ occurred 0-21 days following vaccination. A portion of the ILIs extending beyond 14 days may have been included in the 7 month monitoring period. 97.
  • 102. Conclusions: Adding the adverse events in the 2 weeks following vaccination to the diseases occurring in the following 7 months shows more disease occurred in the vaccinated versus the non-vaccinated. Even this limited trial data shows the vaccine less than worthless in the first flu season following vaccination. Apparently some cases of flu that would have occurred in the 7 month flu season have simply been ―shifted‖ to the period immediately following vaccination and NO prevention of disease has occurred but rather the opposite, disease increased for those who accepted Fluarix. Other brands of flu vaccines show similar patterns. It is known that receiving a flu vaccination in one year makes one more susceptible to a more severe flu the second flu season. Additional long-term consequences of injecting viruses, aluminum and mercury and various chemicals including formaldehyde contained in flu vaccines are unknown due to the absence of scientific research. Influenza vaccines and other vaccines have been associated with increased risk of many autoimmune and neurological diseases and lifelong disabilities and even death. A search of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data base for influenza vaccine (all manufacturers, all ages of patients, covering 1990 to current date, March 21, 2013) reveals 918 events where a patient received the Influenza Vaccine and the patient died, 1,799 events were life threatening, 24,339 events resulted in ER visit and 6,737 events where patient was hospitalized. Only 1%-10% of adverse reactions are reported to VAERS, so you can multiply the preceding figures by at least 10 for more accurate statistics. References: 1. http://www.cochranejournalclub.com/vaccines-for-preventing-influenza-clinical/ 2. http://www.cochranejournalclub.com/vaccines-for-preventing-influenza-clinical/ 3. http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/ us_fluarix.pdf 4. Ibid., Page 11 5. Ibid., Page 4 Copying, sharing and distributing this information is encouraged. 98.
  • 103. Why you should avoid taking the seasonal flu vaccine By Mike Adams (NaturalNews) Every year around this time, the vaccine industry, through its vast network of corporate-government health agencies and mass media partners, begins drumming fear into the minds of the public about seasonal flu in order to drive as many people as possible to get vaccinated with a flu shot. And it seems as though every year, more and more evidence also comes to light illustrating precisely why people should not get a flu shot, at least not without carefully considering the serious ramifications of participating in this annual injection ritual. As you likely have already noticed, it is pretty difficult to go out anywhere in public these days and not come across various signs, banners, and billboards plastered with phrases like, "Protect yourself and your loved ones by getting your flu shot" or "Get the shot, not the flu." And yet, no matter how aggressively the vaccine industry tries to push the flu vaccine on the public, it will always remain an unproven, fear-driven, pseudoscientific scam that offers no measurable health benefits. 'Benefits' of flu shot statistically insignificant Last year, for instance, a study out of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota revealed that, at best, the flu shot has a measly 1.5 percent effectiveness rate -- for every 100 people vaccinated with a flu shot, only 1.5 of them will avoid getting the flu. At worst, the flu shot is entirely useless, as the same study showed that about 97 percent of people who do not get a flu shot also do not get the flu. (http://www.naturalnews.com) Put another way, flu vaccines are about 98.5 percent ineffective, which means the vast majority of people who get a flu shot are deriving absolutely no health benefit. Again, this is in a best case scenario where potential margins of error are ignored and statistical anomalies are set aside. In all reality, there is actually not a shred of indisputable evidence proving that flu shots are at all effective for preventing the flu in anyone. 36,000 people a year do not die from the flu And yet the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), eager to dispense 135 million doses of flu vaccine this year, is waging psychological warfare on the public by repeating equally false claims about how hundreds of thousands of people end up in the hospital every year as a result of influenza infection, and that about 36,000 of them die from flu-related complications. 99.
  • 104. In truth; however, only a few dozen people at most die every year as a direct result of flu infection -- the rest of the deaths lumped into the flu category are actually attributable to pneumonia, which is often a result of a severely compromised immune system. And in some cases, weak immunity caused by the flu shot itself is responsible for deaths blamed on flu infection. (http://www.infowars.com) Flu shots come with a myriad of potential side effects Besides their ineffectiveness, flu shots also come with an array of potentially-deadly side effects that health authorities rarely disclose to the public. Such side effects include things like brain damage and dementia -- many flu shots still contain toxic mercury, after all (http://www.naturalnews.com/031870_flu_shots_brain_damage.html) -- seizures (http://www.naturalnews.com/029334_flu_vaccines_seizures.html), and even flu-like symptoms, which defeats the point of even getting a flu shot in the first place. Vitamin D, 'superfoods' far more effective than flu shots at preventing flu At the same time, the public is not being told that vitamin D, which is most easily obtained through natural sunlight exposure, is far more effective at preventing the flu than any flu shot ever will be (http://www.naturalnews.com/029760_vitamin_D_influenza.html). Supplementing with immune-boosting "superfoods" like spirulina, garlic, and medicinal mushrooms, while drinking plenty of clean water and getting plenty of rest, will also help you avoid getting the flu far better than a flu shot. (http://www.naturalnews.com/019194_flu_the_health.html) Reference - http://www.naturalnews.com/042159_flu_shot_vaccine_myths_influenza.html MUST WATCH VIDEO EXPLAINING HOW THE STUDIES CITED FOR DATA TO MAKE US BELIEVE THAT THE FLU SHOT IS EFFECTIVE IS MANIPULATED AND HOW D3 IS MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING THE FLU AND COLDS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-3yrrgkcLY&feature=youtu.be 100.
  • 105. The Flu Vaccine Increases Your Flu Risk October 6, 2013 by Blanche Levine Sun. Oct. 6, 2013 by Blanche Levine (NaturalHealth365) Many people understand that flu shots aren‘t effective. What is less known is vaccinating against one strain of influenza can actually increase the risk of exposure to different strains. Research in the Journal of Virology found that the seasonal flu vaccine can weaken a child‘s immune system and increase their chances of caching influenza viruses not included in the vaccine. A study published in Science Translational Medicine found a surprising complication of the vaccine design. It was found to increase the risk of contracting the flu – after vaccination. How does the flu vaccine actually harm the body? The vaccine is known to cause an overall immune suppression effect. All vaccines are immune suppressors in a variety of ways. The chemicals in the vaccines; the virus even when it‘s not a ‗live‘ shot; heavy metals and the foreign DNA/RNA from animal tissues can all cause serious health problems. In fact, scientists suggest, the flu vaccine may actually fuel a pandemic outbreak of the flu. In 2009, at the beginning of the swine flu panic, a Canadian study revealed that people who had received a regular, seasonal flu shot, were twice as likely to catch the swine flu. This was proven to be true when, in 2010, the results of several epidemiologic investigations showed that the flu shot did indeed increase the risk of coming down with the swine flu. There were four studies, which were conducted by public health agencies in Canada, involved about 2,700 people in all, and each one had the same result: if you got the seasonal flu shot, you were more likely to get the swine flu. This quote was published by PLoS Medicine: “…Estimates from all four studies (which included about 1,200 laboratory-confirmed pH1N1 cases and 1,500 controls) showed that prior recipients of the 2008-09 TIV [seasonal flu shot] had approximately 1.4-2.5 times increased chances of developing pH1N1 illness that needed medical attention during the spring-summer of 2009 compared to people who had not received the TIV.” The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) scientists infected two groups of pigs with H1N1: one group was vaccinated, with a H1N2 shot, while the other group was not. The piglets who were vaccinated produced a wide range of antibodies to block the H1N2 virus, these antibodies not only failed to protect against the second virus, H1N1, but actually help the second virus infiltrate lung tissue causing more severe symptoms and respiratory complications, these included pneumonia and lung damage. Could avoiding the flu vaccine be better? The unvaccinated control groups had fewer complications and milder pneumonia. There is an association between the vaccine and respiratory diseases, called vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD). This has been reported with the formaldehydeinactivated respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination, which was followed in the vaccinated group by a wild-type (RSV) infection. 101.
  • 106. Misleading media headlines According to virologist Kennedy Shortridge, a professor emeritus at the University of Hong Kong and a pioneer is studying the origin of the flu: ―There a number of infectious agents that can mimic flu‖ and ―In many cases, no laboratory diagnosis of influenza is made.‖ Epidemiologist Tom Jefferson MD, author for the independent Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group, thinks the incidence of influenza is greatly inflated as it is systematically confused with influenza-like illnesses, which are frequently attributable to other viral and bacterial agents. He goes on to say that confusion of influenza with other like illness has confused the situation and fueled frenzy. Experts like Jefferson caution against using the words ―flu‖ and ―influenza‖ interchangeably, noting that ―flu‖ is a more loosely defined category that includes viruses that are not influenza-based, but just happen to cause very similar clinical symptoms. To find out how many cases of influenza-like illness are actually influenza A or B, scientists would need to take a random sample of people diagnosed with influenza-like illness, and then test them for every possible causal agent and illness. The formal studies are few, but Jefferson has completed calculations based on data from trials for vaccines, and he estimates that, on average, only about 7 percent of those with influenza-like illness actually have influenza. ―The CDC and the media portray influenza as a deadly threat,‖ he says. ―But the data suggest that seasonal influenza is a relatively rare and benign condition, with an incidence not exceeding 1 percent in the general population during autumn and winter months.‖ What is the best way to prevent the flu? To protect against the flu should mean defending the body against all pathogens. The way to do this is to incorporate immune building strategies into your lifestyle. Eat a fresh (organic) whole foods diet; eliminate processed junk foods; remain as active as possible and supplement with plenty of vitamin C and other antioxidants – especially if you feel you‘re getting ill. About the author: Blanche Levine has been a student of natural healing modalities for the last 25 years. She has the privilege of working with some of the greatest minds in natural healing including Naturopaths, scientist and energy healers. Having seen people miraculously heal from all kinds of dis-ease through non-invasive methods, her passion now is to help people become aware of what it takes to be healthy. References: http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/universal-flu-vaccine-may-actually-make-flu-symptoms-worse/ http://www.policymic.com/articles/61985/should-you-get-a-flu-shot-new-study-suggests-it-might-put-you-at-risk http://experiencelife.com/article/the-debate-about-flu-shots/ http://www.balancedbodywellnesscentre.com/files/Beware_the_Flu_Shot http://www.parvobuster.com/blog/parvo-news/vaccines-and-immune-suppressionot.pdf http://naturalsociety.com/flu-vaccine-being-pushed-on-all-americans/ http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Your-Immune-System-How-It-Works-And-How-Vaccines-Damage-It http://megankerkhoff.wordpress.com/2013/09/03/is-the-flu-shot-more-dangerous-than-the-flu/ http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2013/08/swine-study-suggests-flu-vaccination-may-sometimes-backfire http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-08-vaccination-flu-worse-exposed-strain.html 102.
  • 107. Toxic Ingredients in the Flu Shot 2-Phenoxyethanol is an anti-bacterial agent being used as a replacement for the preservative Thimerosal (mercury). It‘s considered a very toxic material that could cause a boatload of side effects, including behavioral disorders … vomiting … diarrhea … visual disturbances … convulsions … rapid heart rate … central nervous system disorders … depression … kidney, liver and blood disorders … and reproductive defects. Aluminum shows up in vaccines in many forms – like aluminum phosphate, aluminum hydroxy phosphate sulfate and aluminum hydroxide, to name a few. It works as an ―adjuvant‖ to stimulate your immune system‘s response to the virus in the vaccine. The problem is … aluminum is a particularly dangerous neurotoxin. It has the ability to slip past your body‘s natural defenses and enter your brain – potentially causing brain damage … Alzheimer‘s disease … dementia … convulsions … and coma. Human and animal studies have shown that aluminum can even cause nerve death. Ammonium Sulfate is a substance commonly added to pesticides. It‘s not known at this time if it‘s cancer-causing, but it has been suspected of gastrointestinal, liver, nervous system and respiratory system toxicity. Beta-Propiolactone ranks high as a hazardous chemical on at least five federal regulatory lists. It caused lymphomas and hepatomas after being injected into lab mice, but its true effect on humans is not known. Due to animal study results, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified beta-propiolactone as a possible human carcinogen. Formaldehyde is used as a preservative to stabilize the vaccine. It‘s a colorless, flammable, strong-smelling chemical that‘s mostly used in industry to manufacture building materials and produce many household products. Plus, it‘s also used to embalm – and preserve – dead bodies. (Remember the frog in your high school biology lab?) Formaldehyde is suspected of weakening the immune system and causing neurological system damage … genetic damage … metabolic acidosis (excessive blood acidity) … circulatory shock … respiratory insufficiency … and acute renal (kidney) failure. It‘s been classified as a known human carcinogen (cancer-causing substance) by IARC and is ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds on at least eight federal regulatory lists. Formalin helps preserve the vaccine. It‘s a mixture of formaldehyde, methanol and water. It‘s mostly used to preserve tissue samples in health care laboratories and presents the same danger to your health as formaldehyde does. Gentamicin Sulfate is an antibiotic that ‗s been known to cause deafness or loss of equilibrioception (sense of balance). It can also be highly nephrotoxic (damage your kidneys) if multiple doses accumulate over time. Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) excites and poisons your cells and tissues. It‘s used as a stabilizer in vaccines and is also found in many processed foods. MSG has been shown to cause retinal degeneration … behavior disorders … learning disabilities … reproductive disorders … obesity … and even lesions on the brains of lab animals. Allergic reactions to MSG can be severe. 103.
  • 108. MRC-5 Cellular Protein is human diploid cells taken from aborted human fetuses. They‘re used as a culture to grow the virus. Neomycin is an antibiotic that has been shown to have multiple effects on your body. It can be a neurotoxin and an ototoxin (affect hearing and balance). It also can cause respiratory paralysis, kidney damage and kidney failure. Plus, it retards your vitamin B6 absorption, sometimes leading to mental retardation and epilepsy. Some allergic reactions to neomycin can be life threatening. Octoxinol-9 is a vaginal spermicide. Phenol is included in vaccines to help stimulate immune response. Instead, it does the opposite – by inhibiting phagocytic activity. Phagocytes are your body‘s first line of defense. They engulf and digest antigens and activate the other elements of your immune system. Phenol‘s phagocytic-inhibiting effect actually hinders your immune system from properly dealing with the pathogens that are entering your body through the vaccine. Phenol is used in the production of drugs, weed killers and synthetic resins, so you can imagine the effect it has on the human body. It‘s considered to be toxic to your cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous, reproductive and respiratory systems … your liver … your kidneys … and your skin. Phenol is so deadly that is was used by the Nazis as a means of extermination during the World War II. Phenol injections were given to thousands of people in concentration camps – especially at Auschwitz-Birkenau – to kill those who were mentally ill, had incurable tuberculosis and were permanently incapable of work. Polymyxin B is an antibiotic with some nasty side effects – neurotoxicity and acute renal tubular necrosis (the most common cause of kidney failure). Polysorbate 80 (Tween-80) works as a stabilizer in the vaccine. It‘s used in a wide variety of products including ice cream, milk products, vitamin tablets, lotions and creams and medical products like vaccines and anti-cancer medications. But it‘s not as safe as it sounds. According to the December 2005 issue of Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, polysorbate 80 can affect your immune system and cause severe anaphylactic shock, which can kill. It also causes cancer in animals. Streptomycin is an antibiotic. Its main side effect is ototoxicity – the loss of hearing. Thimerosal is used as a preservative in the vaccine. It contains 49.6% mercury by weight and has been implicated in many health conditions, such as cardiovascular disease … autism … seizures … mental retardation … hyperactivity … dyslexia … and many more nervous system conditions. The mercury used in vaccines is second in toxicity only to the radioactive substance, Uranium. It‘s a powerful neurotoxin that can damage the entire nervous system of an infant in no time. Plus, the inclusion of aluminum and even formaldehyde with the mercury in the vaccine magnifies the problem. Aluminum can make the mercury 100 times more toxic. Toss in formaldehyde as well, and one independent study found that mercury toxicity was increased by 1,000 times. Reference - http://usahitman.com/frwngafs/ 104.
  • 109. 5 Vaccines To Never Give a Child by Dave Mihalovic All vaccines should be avoided, but for those on the fence and still deciding whether to vaccinate your child, please review the following information on these 5 vaccines before blindly following the advice of any medical doctor. Knowledge is power and when you understand the uselessness of specific vaccines, the decision to vaccinate or not becomes a very easy one. When it comes to vaccines, there are three levels of understanding: 1) The first group understands that all vaccines are useless; 2) The second group is still partially affected by medical propaganda from the last century (http://preventdisease.com/news/10/102510_vaccines_did_not_save_us.shtml )and insists there are at least some "good" vaccines; and 3) The last group has a total blind loyalty to what has been erroneously declared as "vaccine science" and will defend all vaccines regardless of any resources or evidence that presents the contrary. These are the three groups I run into daily whether they are members of the community, colleagues, parents, family members or simply people online. I'm sure you can easily situate yourself in at least one of these three groupings. I use specific techniques to deal with each group when communicating information as each can only go down the rabbit hole so far. For obvious reasons, the third group is by far the most difficult to convey any information to since they live in this bubble of disbelief when it comes to any concept that deals with anti-vaccination. This article is specifically for groups 2) and 3). Most of my readers belong to the first group, however many are in the second group as well, which is perfectly understandable. However, as many of you know, I am not a fan of those that sit on the fence when it comes to vaccination (http://preventdisease.com/news/11/122011_When-It-Comes-to-Vaccines-Dont-Sit-On-The-Fence.shtml ) so my goal is always to increase awareness and bring those in level 3) back to level 2) and eventually those in level 2) back to level 1). For some it takes three days and others three years, but regardless of the information presented, any advancement in understanding does not occur until each person is ready to openly receive and embrace the information. 5 Vaccines To Never Give a Child The CDC, public health officials and medical doctors all recommend 49 doses of 14 vaccines before the age of 6? Before you take a risk on vaccinating your child, become informed on each vaccine, its dosage, ingredients, risks and side effects. Here are the big 5 to avoid 1. Flu Vaccine Despite assurances by the FDA to remove thimerosal from vaccines it remains in several influenza vaccines, year after year. Thimerosal is a mercury based neurotoxin which has been proven through many scientific publications and reports to adversely affect the human body and brain. 105.
  • 110. The 2012/2013 season offered three out of six flu vaccines which contained thimerosal and all are were FDA approved. No flu vaccine is ever tested for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility. . This means that none of the carcinogenic excipients (inside every vaccine) are ever studied and their effects on the human body are unknown. This declaration also indicates that there is no responsible authority that can state to a parent, that their son or daughter will not become infertile as a consequence of receiving the influenza vaccine. Another remarkable fact is that although all pregnant women are encouraged to receive the flu vaccine by health and medical authorities, the safety and effectiveness for pregnant women or nursing mothers has also not been established. Perhaps this is why studies show many spontaneous abortions and stillbirths after pregnant women are vaccinated. Moreover, they estimate the probable flu strains meaning that 100 percent of influenza vaccines are a crap shoot in terms of effectiveness for any given population. With more than 200 viruses known to cause influenza-like illness (ILI), a person can get a flu shot and still become sick with what is described as ―the flu‖. According to CDC data, in the past 11 years, 86% of all influenza-type illnesses were NOT caused by the influenza virus, thus influenza viruses are ONLY active 14% of the time. The proportion of ILI caused by influenza viruses varies by year, and even varies within a specific year over the course of the winter. Therefore, under a hypothetical scenario that influenza vaccines work 25% of the time (which is marginally high percentage for flu vaccine effectiveness), that means the maximum effectiveness of the flu vaccine would be 3.5% on influenza viral strains and nil for ILI. A recent report which was highlighted by the alternative media is a remarkable study published in the Cochrane Library which found no evidence of benefit for influenza vaccinations and also noted that the vast majority of trials were inadequate. For a better understanding of what the entire flu season is about, please review my article on Flu Season Exposed As a Fabrication and Plot By Governments, Deliberately Causing Illness To Promote Vaccinations. As of July 2012, there have been more than 84,000 reports of reactions, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following influenza vaccinations made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), including over 1,000 related deaths and over 1,600 cases of GBS. Check out this graph from the National Vaccine Information Center which compares ingredient amounts in different flu vaccines. 106.
  • 111. 2. Chicken Pox Vaccine A five-year-old girl, vaccinated against chicken pox (varicella-zoster virus (VZV)) recently presented with clinical symptoms of the disease. Therefore the diagnosis of a breakthrough varicella disease with the vaccine strain was established. An immunodeficiency was ruled out. This case demonstrates that a child vaccinated against chicken pox does not exclude an infection with the vaccine strain. A county in the western part of Indiana is the site of the nation's largest current chickenpox outbreak, according to news reports. An epidemiologist has confirmed that out of the cases analyzed, 97 percent of the children were vaccinated. To cover-up the wild increase for the disease, public health officials are blaming one unvaccinated child as the cause despite 97 percent of vaccinated children contracting chicken pox. More than 85 percent of those vaccinated received full vaccinations. The claim by public health officials is that 90% of children who are not vaccinated for chickenpox will get it by the time they are twelve. However, studies have demonstrated that the virus remains dormant in the body of those who are vaccinated and can become active again later on. Other studies show that the frequency and incidence are regardless of vaccination rates as those vaccinated still contract the virus and all its symptoms. A report from The New England Journal of Medicine concluded that an outbreak of chickenpox among a group of children in New Hampshire showed that the virus that causes chickenpox can be highly infectious even among those who have been vaccinated. Mass use of chickenpox vaccine by children in the U.S. since 1995 has limited natural boosting of Varicella Zoster immunity in the adult population and there has been a significant increase in cases of Herpes zoster among adults. 3. MMR Vaccine More than 1,000 people in New Jersey and New York were sickened with mumps in the summer of 2010. Health officials linked the outbreak to an 11-year-old boy at the camp. The boy had been fully vaccinated against the mumps, as had 77 percent of the patients in New Jersey. In the United States, children typically receive their mumps vaccination as part of the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advises children to receive their first dose between 12 and 18 months, and their second between the ages of 4 and 6. Mumps used to be a routine childhood disease. Many of you reading this likely had your turn, the virus ran its course while you stayed at home in bed, and you‘ve been rewarded with lifelong immunity. In most cases mumps, like many of the childhood diseases we‘re now vaccinating our children against, is not a serious disease. 107.
  • 112. In rare cases, serious complications can develop, but you must weigh this risk against that of the vaccine, which, for one, definitely contains substances with known toxic properties such as aluminum. The other aspect to the equation is that even if you get the vaccine, you may still get the mumps, which means you‘ve accepted the risk of the vaccine itself with no benefit whatsoever. As of March 1, 2012, there have been 898 claims filed in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) for injuries and deaths following MMR vaccination, including 56 deaths and 842 serious injuries. Using the MedAlerts search engine, as of July 9, 2012 there have been 6,058 serious adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in connection with measles vaccine since 1990, with over half of those occurring in children 3 and under. Evidence has been published in the medical literature that vaccinated persons can get measles because either they do not respond to the vaccine or the vaccine‘s efficacy wanes over time and vaccinated mothers do not transfer long lasting maternal antibodies to their infants to protect them in the first few months of life. 4. DTaP Vaccine Whooping cough, or pertussis, is spreading across the entire US at rates at least twice as high as those recorded in 2011 and epidemiologists and health officials are even admitting that the vaccines may be the cause. The cause could very well be due to multiple loads of toxins delivered through the DTaP vaccine which include, (but not limited to): formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, thimerosal, and polysorbate 80. That means that every DTaP vaccine contains carcinogenic, neurotoxic, immunotoxic and sterility agents just like many of this year's flu vaccines. These chemicals then bioaccumulate in the child with each successive vaccine, further introducing an additional load of toxins with each injection. Dangerous new strains of whooping cough bacteria are now evading Australia's vaccine against the disease and entrenching a four-year epidemic that could soon spread overseas, Sydney scientists have found in research that raises questions about the national vaccine program. The dangerous new strains of whooping cough bacteria were reported in March 2012. The vaccine, researchers said, was responsible. The reason for this is because, while whooping cough is primarily attributed to Bordetella pertussis infection, it is also caused by another closely related pathogen called B. parapertussis, which the vaccine does NOT protect against. Two years earlier, scientists at Penn State had already reported that the pertussis vaccine significantly enhanced the colonization of B. parapertussis, thereby promoting vaccine-resistant whooping cough outbreaks. 108.
  • 113. According to the authors: "... [V]accination led to a 40-fold enhancement of B. parapertussis colonization in the lungs of mice. Though the mechanism behind this increased colonization was not specifically elucidated, it is speculated to involve specific immune responses skewed or dampened by the acellular vaccine, including cytokine and antibody production during infection. Despite this vaccine being hugely effective against B. pertussis, which was once the primary childhood killer, these data suggest that the vaccine may be contributing to the observed rise in whooping cough incidence over the last decade by promoting B. parapertussis infection." Pertussis whooping cough is a cyclical disease with natural increases that tend to occur every 4-5 years, no matter how high the vaccination rate is in a population using DPT/DTaP or Tdap vaccines on a widespread basis. Whole cell DPT vaccines used in the U.S. from the 1950's until the late 1990's were estimated to be 63 to 94 percent effective and studies showed that vaccine-acquired immunity fell to about 40 percent after seven years. In the study cited above, the researchers noted the vaccine's effectiveness was only 41 percent among 2- to 7-year-olds and a dismal 24 percent among those aged 8-12 The fact that many vaccines are ineffective is becoming increasingly apparent. Merck has recently been slapped with two separate class action lawsuits contending they lied about the effectiveness of the mumps vaccine in their combination MMR shot, and fabricated efficacy studies to maintain the illusion for the past two decades that the vaccine is highly protective. Check out this graph from the National Vaccine Information Center which compares ingredient amounts in different DTaP vaccines. 5. HPV Vaccine A closer look at research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (August, 2007), entitled, "Effect of Human Papillomavirus 16/18 L1 Viruslike Particle Vaccine Among Young Women With Preexisting Infection" sought to determine the usefulness of the HPV vaccine among women who already carry HPV (which includes virtually all women who are sexually active, regardless of their age). This document revealed startling information about the ineffectiveness of the Gardasil vaccine. It revealed that the HPV vaccine often caused an increase in the presence of HPV strains while utterly failing to clear the viruses in most women. Merck‘s Gardasil vaccine was studied for less than 3 years in about 12,000 healthy girls and 14000 healthy boys under age 16 before it was licensed in 2006. Gardasil was not studied in children with health problems or in combination with all other vaccines routinely given to American adolescents. Clinical trials did not use a true placebo to study safety but compared Gardasil against the reactive aluminum adjuvant in Gardasil; 109.
  • 114. After Gardasil was licensed and three doses recommended for 11-12 year old girls and teenagers, there were thousands of reports of sudden collapse with unconsciousness within 24 hours, seizures, muscle pain and weakness, disabling fatigue, Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS), facial paralysis, brain inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, blood clots, optic neuritis, multiple sclerosis, strokes, heart and other serious health problems, including death, following receipt of Gardasil vaccine. The authors also found no evidence that the vaccine worked at all. This observation led the authors to offer this damning conclusion that appears to render Gardasil nothing more than a grand medical hoax. A 2011 publication in the Annals of Medicine exposed the fraudulent nature of Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines such as Gardasil and Cervarix. Key messages the researchers report include a lack of evidence for any HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer and lack of evaluation of health risks. The authors concluded by summing up their evidence and stating that the presentation of partial and non-factual information regarding cervical cancer risks and the usefulness of HPV vaccines, as cited above, is neither scientific nor ethical. None of these practices serve public health interests, nor are they likely to reduce the levels of cervical cancer. As of August 2012, there have been a total of 26,304 reports made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) associated with Gardasil or Cervarix vaccines, including 118 deaths. Sources: nvic.org mercola.com vaccine-tlc.org newswithviews.com Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment. Reference - http://preventdisease.com/news/13/022013_5-Vaccines-To-Never-Give-A-Child.shtml 110.
  • 115. Pushing the pandemic: FDA criminalizes secret Chinese medicine formula that blocks bird flu Sunday, April 14, 2013 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...) (NaturalNews) A bird flu pandemic has been sparked in China, where 60 people have so far been infected and 13 have died from various new strains of bird flu (including H7N9). Across China and Taiwan, people are in a panic over the spread of bird flu, and the media there is reporting widespread concern that this may be the beginning of the next global pandemic. A Chinese Air Force General has publicly announced the bird flu is a "bio bomb" weapon launched by the USA, but you won't find that reported in the mainstream media. In fact, the fake media is hardly reporting on this bird flu outbreak at all -- and that's because there is no vaccine to hype yet. ―Note, all H7 vaccines have been a dismal failure as has all vaccines. So your best bet is to follow the recommendations in this Powerpoint and live a healthy lifestyle.‖ Author of this Powerpoint point of view. Reference: http://www.sott.net/article/260873-Vaccine-development-for-H7N9-flu-problematic-because-they-dont-work Once a bird flu vaccine is available that claims to target the new strains, all the scare tactics will be unleashed by the CDC, CNN, MSNBC and other usual suspects. New bird flu strains "evolving to adapt to human cells" So far, those infected with these bird flu strains have all had contact with birds (poultry). The virus hasn't yet achieved a mutation that would allow it to be transmitted via human-to-human transmission. But scientists believe that day is not far off. A study led by Masato Tashiro of the Influenza Virus Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, and Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the University of Tokyo concludes the new bird flu strain is "evolving to adapt to human cells, raising concern about its potential to spark a new global flu pandemic." As Science Daily reports: "The human isolates, but not the avian and environmental ones, have a protein mutation that allows for efficient growth in human cells and that also allows them to grow at a temperature that corresponds to the upper respiratory tract of humans, which is lower than you find in birds.― 111.
  • 116. FDA criminalizes medicinal bird flu defenses Meanwhile, the FDA continues to do everything in its power to maximize the death toll if such a pandemic is unleashed. This is a form of "vaccine terror" that attempts to achieve maximum casualties in order to scare everybody into buying in to the vaccine hoax. The FDA's strategy for this began in 2004 with the banning of Ma Huang (ephedra), a powerful Chinese Medicine herb that's part of a little-known bird flu defense formula called, "Minor Blue Green Dragon." On November 23, 2004, the FDA unleashed an assault on all dietary supplements containing Ma Huang (ephedra), calling it "dangerous at any dose." This was a complete hoax, of course, given that the FDA routinely allows super deadly pharmaceuticals to remain on the market (Vioxx) even when they kill 50,000 or more Americans. Ma Huang has been used in Chinese Medicine for literally thousands of years with no reports of toxicity. Because of this banning of Ma Huang by the FDA, ephedra is no longer available in any Chinese Medicine formulas sold throughout the United States. While alternatives have been attempted, none have proven nearly as effective because the primary purpose of Ma Huang in these formulations is to open the pores and allow sweating to occur as part of the body's process for eliminating the bird flu virus. There are, however, ways to legally acquire Ma Huang through back channels (see below)... Natural News publishes secret Chinese formula for "Minor Blue Green Dragon" Here's the formula for making Minor Blue Green Dragon, a formula with over 2,000 years of epidemiological evidence behind its efficacy and safety. It is this formula that helped save large regions of China from ancient pandemics that threatened the nation. This formula is offered as-is, without warranty, under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, and with the understanding that you will seek the help of a qualified Chinese Medicine practitioner before attempting to acquire, manufacture or consume this remedy. Both English and Chinese names are provided: Ephedra Stem (Ma Huang) 9g Cinnamon twig (Gui Zhi) 9g White peony root (Bai Shao) 9g Honey Prepared Licorice (Zhi Gan Cao) 9g Dried Ginger (Gan Jiang) 3-6g Asarum (Xi Xin) 3g Pinellia rhizome (Ban Xia) 9g Schisandra fruit (Wu Wei Zi) 9g 112.
  • 117. This formula is contraindicated if the patient is already sweating. It is typically used for a patient suffering from high fever, coughing and loss of appetite. How to acquire Ma Huang despite FDA prohibition attempts Each of these herbs can still be purchased in bulk by visiting bulk herbal sellers located in your nearest China Town. Be sure to tell them you are purchasing these herbs as a "food" for making "tea." Do not state you are using them as medicine, or they may not sell them to you. In addition, you can also purchase Ma Huang and other herbs directly from herbal suppliers in Taiwan. I'm not recommending a list of suppliers because we haven't yet had the time to sort through them all, but the "Sun-Ten" brand is quite reputable and offers exceptional quality control. (They do not sell direct to consumers. You will need to find a distributor...). Remember: You may be able to find so-called "Minor Blue Green Dragon" formulas for sale in the USA, but they will lack Ma Huang, the key ingredient. Check the labels to see for yourself. If you want a truly effective combination formula, you'll have to make it yourself thanks to the FDA's attempts to make sure people have no defenses against bird flu (other than vaccines). For the record, Ma Huang (ephedra) is only dangerous if taken by stupid people who eat it by the bottle, in isolation, in a desperate attempt to lose weight. Nowhere in Chinese Medicine is Ma Huang ever given in isolation. The FDA does not understand the idea of "synergy" in herbal medicines and so completely misunderstands Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and how its chemical constituents work in concert to nullify any risk of toxicity. Reference: http://www.naturalnews.com/039911_bird_flu_secret_formulas_Minor_Blue_Green_Dragon.html 113.
  • 118. LEGAL & LEGISLATION INFORMATION Forced Flu shot in Health care settings is due to finance reasons not healthcare reasons (http://www.hhs.gov/ash/initiatives/hai/hcpflu.html Stay up to date in your state concerning vaccine rights and legislation https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx Reporting Vaccination Harassment, Discrimination and Coercion Incidents https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Resources/ReportingVaccinationHarassmentIncidents.aspx Vaccine exemption forms by state (Medical, Philosophical and Religious) http://experimentalvaccines.org/vaccine-exemption-forms/ Vaccine Rights Attorney Before you say or do anything that may interfere with your right to refuse vaccination, CONTACT a Vaccination Rights Attorney, Alan Phillips http://www.vaccinerights.com/attorneyphillips.html and purchase Alan‘s e-book ―The Authoritative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions‖, page 114 of this power point. You can also ask questions on one of my weekly live radio shows on BlogTalkRadio.com: 1. The Know Your Rights Hour, Mondays, 9 pm ET: www.blogtalkradio.com/knowyourrightshour Call-in number: 646-478-9662 (to listen or join the conversation with your questions or comments) 2. Vaccines and Your Rights in the U.S., Thursdays at 1pm ET: www.freedomizerradio.com Call-in number: 347-324-3704 (to listen or join the conversation with your questions or comments) Vaccine Injury Attorneys - http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Vaccine%20Attorneys_10.pdf Vaccine Refusal Form - Don't sign that form by the AAP (American Academy of Pediatricians) accusing you of neglect and abuse by not vaccinating. Hand this refusal form over to your pediatrician instead to keep on file. http://www.educate4theinjured.org/#!vaccine-refusal-form/cno1 Lack of Informed Consent is a common reason why physicians are sued It is law that the physician must inform you of all the possible adverse effects and complications. Currently the US Health and Human Services department pays out tens of millions of dollars every year to individuals and families who are severely injured or killed by vaccines. The media never reports this and the vaccine manufacturers aren‘t required to openly disclose the risks and side effects of vaccines in their promotional material and advertisements like drug companies. The CDC requires the physician is to give you a vaccine information statement before administering a vaccine http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/index.html . After looking at the forms for each vaccine they list one or two adverse reactions out of the hundreds possible including death. 114.
  • 119. •NEW 2013 EDITION NOW AVAILABLE! FINALLY -- Comprehensive, authoritative information about vaccine exemptions you can trust, from Alan Phillips, J.D., a leading vaccine rights attorney with years of experience helping clients throughout the U.S. legally avoid vaccines in a wide variety of vaccine-refusal settings. Critical details for parents, students, immigrants, healthcare employees, military personnel and contractors, agencies, attorneys and clients-virtually anyone concerned with legally avoiding vaccines in the United States. Now with new information about employee exemptions, immigration waivers, vaccine custody disputes, international travel, and rights in declared emergencies---from local outbreaks to pandemics! Warning: People have lost exemption rights by relying on anti-vaccine websites. Even sites from vaccine book authors and alternative medical doctors have misinformation. They mean well, but they don't know the law! This Guide provides and explains: Important background information about the legal system; •How state and federal statutes, regulations, constitutions and legal precedent interact to define the boundaries of your legal exemption rights; •How to deal with local authorities and to avoid mistakes that cost others their exemption; •Where legal technicalities and practical reality differ--and what to do about it; •When you need an attorney, and why... *Available as an E-Book Only [pdf format]: PURCHASE - $24.95 http://www.vaccinerights.com/e-book.html 115.
  • 120. ONE WAY FOR A HEALTH PRACTITIONER TO OBTAIN AN EXEMPTION FROM THE FLU SHOT VERY IMPORTANT NOTE by ALAN PHILIPS, VACCINE RIGHTS ATTORNEY by Alan Phillips, attorney Comment: I appreciate Becky's sincere desire to help, but having worked with a couple of hundred healthcare workers around the country, most of whom were successful in avoiding flu vaccines at work, I can tell you that Becky's letter is one of the quickest ways to be DENIED an exemption from an employer. I believe she means well, but with hospital administrators, this is not a scientific or medical issue, it's an economic issue--Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement is reportedly being made contingent in some degree by achieving 90% immunization rates. And while federal civil rights law provides an "out" on religious grounds, vaccine safety and effectiveness issues will not qualify you for that. Respectfully to all concerned, Alan Phillips, JD www.vaccinerights.com Here‘s Becky‘s letter to the higher-ups at the hospital: (Full name withheld), RN To whom it may concern: I am writing to formally defend my decision to decline the influenza vaccination. I have made this decision based on strong moral and ethical convictions that are supported by my religious beliefs, medical research and legal precedent. Medical research indicates that the efficacy of the influenza vaccination is grossly exaggerated (1). The British Medical Journal has questioned the validity of studies claiming efficacy and stated that “evidence from systemic reviews shows that inactivated vaccines have little or no effect on the effects measured.” (2) Another journal has proven influenza vaccinations have not changed the amount of doctor visits or hospitalizations in children (3,4,5), and another shows that vaccinations have not impacted the mortality rate of the elderly population. (6,7) There is also a lack of supporting evidence to show that vaccinating healthcare workers prevents influenza transmission. (8) I believe that these vaccinations are providing a false sense of security and therefore putting our patients at risk. An even greater risk exists for those that receive the vaccination. The CDC lists the following as being found in the influenza vaccination: Neomycin, Polymyxin B, formaldehyde or formalin, thimerosal, embryonated chicken eggs, egg albumin, gelatin, Gentamycin, Polyoxyethylene 9-10 Nonyl Phenol (Triton N-101, Octoxynol 9), chick kidney cells and Taurodeoxychoalate. (9) Many of these are known carcinogens and detergents that have unknown effects on the human body. Chronic over exposure to antibiotics has also proven to be detrimental to overall health. (10) 116.
  • 121. Some of the potential side effects from the vaccination include anaphylaxis, allergic asthma, redness and discomfort at the injection site, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, vasculitis, body aches, paresthesia, neuopathy, seizure, facial palsy, facial paresis, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, headache, sore throat, muscle aches, cough, chills, fever, encephalitis and meningitis. (11) Thimerosal has been shown to potentially increase the risk of Alzheimer’s Disease, brain damage and nervous system injury. (12,13,14) This is especially alarming to me as my grandfather passed away at the beginning of the year as a result of Alzheimer’s Disease. Package inserts also state that the vaccination/mist “has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or its potential to impair fertility.” This clearly states then that very little is known about the long-term health effects of receiving this vaccination. There is also no guarantee of protection from influenza or potential temporary or permanent injury or even death. I believe that vaccination is an invasive medical procedure and based on the above, is an experimental procedure. While I support the hospital’s desire to maintain safety for both patients and staff, I cannot support the use of mandatory vaccinations to achieve this goal. The mandatory administration of this is in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code which states in article 1 that consent should be voluntary and allow for “free power of choice without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.” Article 6 states, “the degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.” And article 9, “During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.” (15) As a Christian I believe I am to treat my body with respect as it is a gift from God (see 2 Corinthians 7:1 and 1 Corinthians 6:19 and 20). I believe that destroying life and knowingly injecting myself with toxins is a contradiction to my beliefs and unacceptable. Health is of great importance to me and something that I do not take lightly. I choose to maintain my health by following The Weston A. Price Foundation’s recommendations on nutrition. 916) I also adhere to regular exercise, proper vitamin D intake (17), adequate rest and stress management, and appropriate preventative health care. My desire is to continue to do the above and to partner with (hospital name withheld) in providing excellent patient care. Sincerely, (Full name withheld), RN (See references below.) SUCCESS! Becky was able to keep her job and not get the flu vaccine, pretty impressive, huh?! A note from from Becky to all of you, my readers: I was originally supposed to go before a committee from the hospital and defend my position, but we were unable to find a time that worked for all of us. The way the mandate is presented to the employees makes it seem as though the only exemptions they allow are medically based, and that even those are rare exemptions. You can be sure they don’t like to heavily advertise the fact that you can stand up for yourself and not follow their mandates. So in the end I presented this to the HR representative from the committee, who then brought it back to the committee and then contacted me. The meeting I had with him went well because I had prepared this calmly and rationally the night before, so if anyone is asking advice on how to approach a situation like this (besides with lots of prayer), clearly stated knowledge is the best thing you can have. The other thing that I learned from this is not only to arm yourself with knowledge, but to be consistent. 117.
  • 122. That’s what the committee was looking for; they wanted to know that I hadn’t just grabbed this off the internet because it sounded like it might work. I want to encourage people that read this letter to make it their own. Please, feel free to use the ideas and references, but make sure it means something to you and put it into your own words. The chance of success will be better if there is palpable passion behind the words. And truly, for me, I wanted to know I had given it my all, even if I did lose my job. 1 Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;1. BMJ 2006;333: 3 Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Oct;162(10):943-51 4 Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2. 5 Arch Dis Child. 2004 Aug;89(8):734-5. 6 Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Oct;7(10):658-66 7 Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Sep 1;178(5):527-33. Epub 2008 Jun 12. 8 Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;(2):CD005187 9 http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf accessed 12/11/11 10 http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/06/18/antibiotics-bacteria.aspx accessed 12/11/11 11 Package inserts for FluMist and Fluarix 12 Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry. 2009;91(4):735-49. 13 Cell Biol Toxicol. 2010 Apr;26(2):143-52. Epub 2009 Apr 9. 14 http://drtenpenny.com/should_flu.aspx accessed 12/11/11 15 http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html accessed 12/11/11 16 http://www.westonaprice.org/ accessed 12/11/11 17 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2870528/ accessed 12/11/11 2 Reference: - http://kellythekitchenkop.com/2012/02/healthcare-workers-how-to-refuse-mandatory-vaccines-and-not-get-fired.html VERY IMPORTANT NOTE by ALAN PHILIPS, VACCINE RIGHTS ATTORNEY by Alan Phillips, attorney Comment: I appreciate Becky's sincere desire to help, but having worked with a couple of hundred healthcare workers around the country, most of whom were successful in avoiding flu vaccines at work, I can tell you that Becky's letter is one of the quickest ways to be DENIED an exemption from an employer. I believe she means well, but with hospital administrators, this is not a scientific or medical issue, it's an economic issue--Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement is reportedly being made contingent in some degree by achieving 90% immunization rates. And while federal civil rights law provides an "out" on religious grounds, vaccine safety and effectiveness issues will not qualify you for that. Respectfully to all concerned, Alan Phillips, JD www.vaccinerights.com 118.
  • 123. The below was used successfully to stop forced vaccination in a health care setting To: Director of Business Administration & Director of Nursing (Company Name and Address) Date: October 29, 2013 Re: Required Flu Vaccine for all associates I feel I have signed the Acceptance Statement for the required Flu Vaccine without understanding of my constitutional rights, employee handbook rights and mostly out of fear of losing my job. As I am now required by (Company Name)‘s new standard and practices to be vaccinated for the flu against my strong moral beliefs, which was not an option listed on the Declination Statement (though remains common practice still in most (US State) healthcare facilities) and was not required at my time of agreeing to employment at (Company Name), I would like to ask that (Company Name) please provide the following to me before required administration of this vaccination: 1. Name and Contact information of the ordering Physician. 2. Name and Contact information of the vaccination's manufacturer. 3. All ingredients of the immunization. 4. Acceptance of responsibility statement, signed below: If ischemic brain damages, long or short term neurological damages or any adverse reactions emerge in this employee: (Employee Name) post vaccination, (Company Name) accepts full responsibility for the brain and health damages and any related loss or damages suffered to this employee relating to this flu vaccination which is required for the employee to remain scheduled and for her to avoid disciplinary action up to and including separation of employment, as an employee of (Company Name). _________________________________________ Printed Name Position _________________________________________ Signed Name Date" _____________________________________ I STILL RECOMMEND CONTACTING A VACCINE RIGHTS ATTORNEY (ALAN PHILLIPS) TO REPRESENT YOU AND YOUR COLLEAGUES. IF YOU ARE DENIED THAN THERE IS NEARLY 0 CHANCE OF BEING SUCCESSFUL THE SECOND TIME AROUND. 119.
  • 124. Mandatory flu vaccination policies Hunton & Williams LLP USA April 1 2013 The 2012-2013 flu season continues to take a toll on the workplace. According to the Centers for Disease Control (‖CDC‖), this year‘s flu season began four weeks earlier than most recent seasons and, as of the week ending March 9, 2013, flu season activity has remained elevated across the United States. Having already taken the lives of 64 children, and with adult numbers unavailable until the end of the flu season, many employers are considering the implementation of mandatory flu vaccination policies. While such policies may serve business and safety needs of protecting their workplace and workforce, employers should ask themselves the following three questions before adopting such a policy: What are the business needs for implementing the policy? Prior to implementing a mandatory flu vaccination policy, employers need to carefully evaluate the business and safety needs for the requirement. Whether out of a concern for the safety of patients or customers or the need to ensure an adequate and fully-staffed workplace, an employer needs to be ready to identify these reasonable business interests should an employee or applicant challenge the policy. Is your workforce unionized? Under the National Labor Relations Act, flu vaccination policies must be collectively bargained. Accordingly, unionized employers cannot unilaterally impose a mandatory flu vaccination policy without first providing notice to the union and bargaining at the union‘s request. Despite this, unionized employers need to carefully evaluate the management rights clause contained in their collectivebargaining agreement. The National Labor Relations Board recently issued an opinion finding that a union waived the right to bargain over a flu vaccination policy by agreeing to the management rights clause in the parties‘ collective bargaining agreement. Virgina Mason Hospital, 358 NLRB No. 64 (2012). The Board recognized that this waiver allowed the hospital to require non-immunized nurses to wear face masks. 120.
  • 125. How will you enforce the policy? When adopting a mandatory flu vaccination policy, employers must be prepared to address objections raised by their employees. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission takes the view that employees may be exempt from mandatory vaccination policies based on an Americans with Disabilities Act ―disability‖ or a sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance. Pandemic Preparedness in the Workplace and the Americans With Disabilities Act (2009) http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/pandemic_flu.html . Such sincerely held religious beliefs do not have to be mainstream or widely recognized religions and may include lifestyle choices such as veganism. See Chenzira v. Cincinnati Children‘s Hosp. Med. Ctr., No. 1:11-CV-00917, 2012 WL 6721098, at *4 (Dec. 27, 2012)(the court declined to dismiss plaintiff‘s religious discrimination claim when her employer terminated her employment after she refused to be vaccinated for the flu on account of her veganism). Despite this expansive definition, the EEOC stated that it is unlikely that religious beliefs include ―secular philosophical opposition to vaccination.‖ EEOC Informal Discussion Letter (Mar. 5, 2012) http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/foia/letters/2012/religious_accommodation.html . When an employee raises a health or religious-based objection to the vaccination policy, the employer needs to discuss reasonable accommodations with the employee. Such reasonable accommodations may include entirely excusing the employee from the policy, requiring the employee to wear a protective facemask or temporarily transferring the employee to another position. Employers need not offer these reasonable accommodations if providing them would cause ―undue hardship.‖ In determining whether undue hardship exists, the EEOC found the following factors relevant: (1) the assessment of the public risk posed at a particular time; (2) the availability of effective alternative means of infection control; and (3) the potential number of employees who actually request accommodation. EEOC Informal Discussion Letter (Mar. 5, 2012). In addition to tackling objections raised by employees, employers need to implement the policy across its workforce uniformly. Employers should not terminate summarily an employee who refuses a flu vaccination without first engaging in a discussion to determine whether the employee is objecting for health or religious based reasons. Furthermore, employers might consider gradual discipline for first-time offenders such as issuing a letter of instruction. A letter from Dr. Edward F. Yazbak regarding Dr. Wakefield: The Time Has Come … To Restore the Lancet Paper F Edward Yazbak MD Dr. Edward Yazbak It would be safe to say that we never had a circus in the United States that remotely resembled the three-year-long hearings of the General Medical Council in London that decided the ―fitness to practice medicine‖ of Drs. Murch, Walker-Smith and Wakefield. 121.
  • 126. Thanks to frequent reports by John Stone and remarkably detailed analyses by Martin Hewitt most of us in the United States began to understand the wild and crazy happenings at the GMC and the role of freelance journalist Brian Deer who seemed to have started the whole saga. http://tinyurl.com/acqe37v In January 2010, the GMC announced its decision that ―serious professional misconduct‖ by the doctors had occurred, a decision that was promptly appealed by Professor John Walker-Smith. Swayed by the events, the allegations of scientific fraud and the frenzied barrage of anti-Wakefield sentiment, the Editor of the Lancet retracted the original February 1998 paper by Wakefield et al. In July 2010, even though a duly filed appeal had been initiated, the GMC revoked the medical licenses of Professor Walker-Smith and of Dr. Andrew Wakefield or as they say in England, erased their names from the medical practice register. Professor Walker-Smith‘s appeal was heard in February 2012 by Justice Mitting who promptly quashed all charges against the distinguished scholar and announced his decision in a blistering criticism of the GMC decision. A single sentence by Justice Mitting well described his opinion of the GMC proceedings: "It would be a misfortune if this were to happen again" The Mitting decision also proved that there had never been any scientific fraud as alleged by Brian Deer in the British Medical Journal, where the Lancet article had been so frequently maligned. Recently, Walker, Fortunato, Gonzalez and Krigsman published a remarkable paper titled “Identification of Unique Gene Expression Profile in Children with Regressive Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Ileocolitis” in which they concluded in part that “Gene expression profiles in intestinal biopsy tissue from patients with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and ASDGI, while having significant overlap with each other, also showed distinctive features for each group. Taken together, these results demonstrate that ASDGI children have a gastrointestinal mucosal molecular profile that overlaps significantly with known inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet has distinctive features that further supports the presence of an ASD-associated IBD variant…” http://tinyurl.com/btzpbmr The presence of ―distinctive features" of "an ASD-associated IBD variant‖ more than confirms the fact that Wakefield and others were on the right track, that their research was justified and that their findings were valid. Under extreme pressure, the Editor of the Lancet retracted the Wakefield paper when the General Medical Council accused three of its authors of professional misconduct and raised questions about the integrity of their research and the strength of their findings. 122.
  • 127. Since then, a Court of Law found that there had neither been professional misconduct nor scientific fraud and an independent study, conducted in the United States, confirmed that children with regressive autism do indeed have very peculiar and unique gastro-intestinal findings, exactly what Wakefield, Walker-Smith and others had reported in 1998. Now is the perfect time for the Editor of the Lancet to restore the Wakefield paper, in spite of the present media hysterics. He had the courage to publish that important research in the first place. He should have the grit to publish it again in the best tradition of the Lancet. F Edward Yazbak MD, FAAP Falmouth, Massachusetts Reference: http://www.vaccinationnews.com/4013-4-22-restore-lancet-paper-YazbakFE Reference: http://www.nvic.org/doctors-corner/Edward-Yazbak.aspx 4-22-2013 Measles scare in the Associated Press due to upcoming jurisdictional appeal by Andrew Wakefield? The Associated Press in the United States has picked up on a media story from the United Kingdom that blames Dr. Andrew Wakefield's 1998 Lancet paper on a current measles outbreak (See source article dated May 20). Dr. Wakefield also happens to be suing UK Sunday Times journalist Brian Deer and British Medical Journal's Fiona Godlee for defamation. A jurisdictional appeal will be heard in a Texas court tomorrow, May 22, 2013 Dr. Wakefield is author of over 130 academic papers and was concerned about inadequate safety testing of the MMR vaccine. The esteemed Cochrane Review actually confirms inadequate safety testing. The 1998 Lancet paper, a case study of twelve autistic children with severe gastrointestinal problems, found the measles virus in the children's guts. The Lancet paper was only retracted and never discredited according to Attorney Christina Waldman. The results of the Lancet paper's research have been replicated numerous times now most recently this April by Dr. Stephen Walker at Wake Forest University. Location: USA 123.
  • 128. The two sides to this story are told by Dr. Wakefield in his book, "Callous Disregard, Autism and Vaccines - The Truth Behind a Tragedy" (Skyhorse Publishing: NY 2010). Despite five years of inquiry by the General Medical Council, no charge of scientific fraud was ever made by the GMC against Defendants Wakefield, Walker-Smith, or Murch. The allegations of fraud were made by journalist Brian Deer. Dr. John Walker-Smith won his appeal and was reinstated by the GMC, with warnings by Justice Mitting about the failings of the "show trial" that took the licenses of Drs. Wakefield and Walker-Smith. Attorney Waldman also believes that Dr. Wakefield, who had been living in Texas for years, was at a great disadvantage in trying to defend himself in the UK trial. There was no evidence the data were fixed, as Deer alleged. As Dr. Wakefield wrote in Callous Disregard (Ch. 1, "That Paper," p. 16), "In the hands of someone determined to discredit the work, however, discrepancies between the routine clinical report (which may have come, for example, from a pathologist with an interest in brain disease or gynecological pathology) and the standardized expert analysis were falsely reported in the national media as "fixing" of the data. I was specifically accused of this [by Deer], although I had no part in scoring the reviews....Paradoxically, the price paid for diligent science has been a headline proclaiming fraud...." Reference: Attorney Christina Waldman and http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/years-after-scare-linked-measles-shot-toautism-unprotected-uk-children-drive-measles-spread/2013/05/20/73f4ac2a-c134-11e2-9aa6-fc21ae807a8a_allComments.html?ctab=all_ Reference: http://www.facebook.com/chiromother 124.
  • 129. How Many Vaccines Are Being Researched and Are Ready For FDA Approval? Do not be Apathetic – (having or showing little or no feeling or emotion : spiritless. 2. : having little or no interest or concern : indifferent. The biggest problem with being apathetic is that it is a word comprised mostly of the word "pathetic―- evoking or expressing pity, sympathy, etc; distressingly inadequate pitifully inferior or inadequate) and let a police state form and pass laws to force us to inject our bodies with dangerous vaccines that only benefit the pharmaceuticals, governments and physicians. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb or moAb) Any of the highly specific antibodies produced in large quantity by the clones of a single hybrid cell formed in the laboratory by the fusion of a B cell with a tumor cell. In 2010, there were more than 330 vaccines either already on the market or in development. Now, in 2013, there are 250 vaccines either in clinical trials or already awaiting approval by the FDA. By product type, the 907 products include: antisense - 30; - cell therapy - 69; - gene therapy - 46; - mAbs - 388; - recombinant proteins 93; - vaccines - 250; and 81 others. The greatest amount of research currently underway is in mAbs - 338 are in development - and vaccines, with 250 in clinical trials or under review at FDA. According to a hospital attorney, CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) will be deducting 2% of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements to hospitals whose employee flu vaccination rates is less than 90%. This means that the scientific merits (or lack thereof) of the flu vaccine policy are irrelevant to hospital policy makers. By making this a financial issue for hospital administrators, those orchestrating the flu vaccine agenda have managed to keep the medical science off the table, a necessity for pushing flu vaccines given the credible information revealing that flu vaccines don't work can and do cause permanent disability and death, as confirmed by Cochrane Collaboration reviews http://www.cochrane.org/ and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreports.html#Stats respectively. Reference: http://www.pharmatimes.com/Article/13-03-12/US_pharma_907_biologic_drugs_and_vaccines_now_in_R_D.aspx Reference: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccine-legislative-update-vaccine-police-stateknocking?utm_source=www.GreenMedInfo.com&utm_campaign=f99bbdb426-Greenmedinfo&utm_medium=email Remember, only 1-10% of adverse reactions are reported according to the FDA and the vaccine court tries every way possible to dismiss every case and has a track record of 25% of cases compensated and 75% dismissed so as not to prove that vaccines are dangerous and useless. 125.
  • 130. Posted on May 3, 2013 by Child Health Safety Big Headline – but a very short posting to the links to the official figures just published by Public Health Wales. You will not believe your eyes – so download them and see for yourself. Links to the full official statistics reports below from Public Health Wales. For the entire period 1 January to March 31, 2013 there were just 26 laboratory confirmed cases out of 446 notifications: 10 in January, 8 in February. And in March just eight cases out of 302 notifications. That is a percentage rate of over-diagnosis and over-notification of 3774 %. Or put it another way 0.027 of notified cases were actually measles – and it is medical professionals who do the diagnosing and notifying. Kind of knocks your faith in the ability of doctors to diagnose a basic childhood illness. And we must not forget the poor man who died – but no one knows what he died of and three doctors did not diagnose it as measles. But the British media lapped it up – after all – it was a death and you know how they love to wave the shroud to sell their papers in an ever-dwindling market. Journalism – a dying profession in more ways than one. And the media hype is exactly the same kind of tosh from public health officials that we saw over SARS, then bird ‗flu, then swine ‗flu. Now you can see the extent of the scam being run by public health officials in Wales, UK. Don‘t bother buying newspapers or believing the garbage news from the BBC and other TV ―journalists‖. These people are just irresponsible scaremongerers. You cannot trust a word they write or broadcast. Or are they just morons or what? Not the kind of profession Joseph Pullitzer describes here: ―An able, disinterested, public-spirited press, with trained intelligence to know the right and courage to do it, can preserve that public virtue without which popular government is a sham and a mockery.‖ You can rely on good old CHS because we let you check out the figures here all by yourself. Compare these two separate official reports – one is laboratory confirmed cases and the other is notifications: 126.
  • 131. All Wales surveillance of laboratory confirmed infections – CDSC Wales monthly report – Report date: Tue 02 Apr 2013 – Data to end of week: 2013 Week 13: Reference: http://www2.nphs.wales.nhs.uk:8080/CommunitySurveillanceDocs.nsf/3dc04669c9e1eaa880257062003b246b/38c4ee86b5fd701e80257b 41003cdc52/$FILE/monthly%20lab%20201303.pdf See Table on Page 18 ―2013 – Reports of Measles virus by LHB/LA of residence by month (table 2 of 2)‖ And compare with this: All Wales surveillance of notifiable communicable diseases – CDSC Wales monthly report – Report date: Tue 02 Apr 2013 – Data to end of week: 2013 Week 13 Reference: http://www2.nphs.wales.nhs.uk:8080/CommunitySurveillanceDocs.nsf/3dc04669c9e1eaa880257062003b246b/abefff808d75f76580257b4 1003cf988/$FILE/monthly%20notif%20201303.pdf See Table on Page 4 ―2013 – Notifications of Measles by LHB/LA of residence by month (table 2 of 2)‖ BUT: the really interesting bit will be the figures for April. When there is a big panic on stirred up in 66 million people of the UK by just a handful of health officials and the completely useless easily manipulated British media, doctors will be notifying the spots on their tablecloths as measles. So if the figures for April are wildly different, you will know for sure someone is not telling it as it is. Let‘s wait for the April 2013 figures. 127.
  • 132. ALTERNATIVE HEALTCARE PRACTITIONERS • American Association of Naturopathic Physicians 206-298-0126 Referral number: 206-298-0125 www.naturopathic.org • American Holistic Medical Association 703-556-9245 www.holisticmedicine.org • American Naturopathic Medical Association 702-897-7053 http://anma.net • National Center for Homeopathy http://nationalcenterforhomeopathy.org/resources/practitioners • Holistic Pediatric Association 707-237-5312 http://www.hpakids.org and http://www.novaxdoctors.webs.com/ • International Chiropractic Pediatric Association http://www.icpa4kids.org/locator/index.php • If you're not sure about chiropractic and how it may help your child, you can find answers here http://www.icpa4kids.org/why.htm • Health care practitioner database on Mothering http://www.mothering.com/discussions/forumdisplay.php?f=167 and their forum http://www.mothering.com/discussions/forumdisplay.php?f=140 Typing in your town, or nearest major city should get you some good info. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AP_Doctor_Referral/ http://www.mothering.com/discussions/ click on finding your tribe • Holistic Moms Network http://www.holisticmoms.org/ click on "chapters' in the column on the right of the page 128.
  • 133. Recommended Websites and Videos for accurate environmental and health information. Vaccination • http://vaccineresearchlibrary.com/ Collection of links to thousands of abstracts and full text articles that are ONLY from SCIENTIFIC and CONVENTIONAL MEDICAL LITERATURE that expose the harm of vaccines and PROVE that VACCINES are NOT SAFE, are NOT EFFECTIVE and can CAUSE HARM. • http://experimentalvaccines.org Website owner produces videos using Government and medical literature to prove the lies and dangers of vaccination. Subscribe for the video newsletter sent to your inbox 3 X‘s/week. Search the archives. • http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreports.html#Stats Search the latest vaccine injury awards by National Vaccine Injury Compensation program (VICP) • http://www.nvic.org/ voted the most reliable and truthful website on vaccines by both vaccinators and non-vaccinators • http://www.medalerts.org/ Everything you need to know about the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) records. • http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/wayback/ Use the Way back machine to find records that the government have deleted or changed to hide the truth about the adverse reactions caused by vaccines. • http://www.fourteenstudies.org/index.html The best site for proving the relationship between vaccines and Autism • http://vactruth.com/ • http://drtenpenny.com/home/ Great accurate info. On vaccines, DVD‘s for sale, books for sale by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny • http://vaxtruth.org • http://www.mercola.com/ subscribe to both news letters from Dr. Mercola for our health and Dr. Becker for pet homeopathy • http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/ • http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ • http://truthaboutgardasil.org/ • http://sanevax.org/ Read about the real deaths and suffering from Gardasil (HPV) vaccine written by victims and parents of victims • http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/03.27.11-HPV-Vaccine-Fact-Sheet121.pdf Gardasil and Cervarix (HPV) Fact Sheet • http://www.vacinfo.org/ • http://www.healthsentinel.com/joomla/ Graphs of disease made from data collected from government‘s around the world • http://tv.naturalnews.com/ Video interviews with experts in their field • http://www.naturalnews.com/ • http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/vaccinations/ Interactive group that shares information on vaccines • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7arAcj-ZP6U MUST WATCH! 67 minutes Dr. Blaylock on Excitotoxins • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT-2S7L-N9c Movie of Dr. Wakefield • http://www.vacinfo.org/researchers.htm - VIC (Vaccine Information Coalition). Research on vaccines 129.
  • 134. • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hITYIT02rA Lethal Injection: The story of Vaccination • http://www.greenmedinfo.com/guide/health-guide-vaccine-research Vaccine research and studies • http://www.greatergoodmovie.org/ Must order Documentary on the truth about vaccines ―The Greater Good‖ Presents both sides of the debate. Only conclusion after watching it is do not vaccinate! • http://www.greatergoodmovie.org/store/ Great new baby gift package includes • http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=776ECC7856D0EC8CF1B2719888A89E6A Part 1 Interview with Producer of the Documentary ―The Greater Good‖ MUST WATCH! 18 minutes • http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=F8EF544E36AC7EDC33C0BC0DA61104CF Part 2 Interview with producer of the Documentary ―The Greater Good‖ MUST WATCH! 22 minutes • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-vkTMWLd5M ONE OF THE BEST DOCUMENTARY ON VACCINES I HAVE IN MY LIBRARY! MUST WATCH 34 MINUTE TRAILER ON NEWLY RELEASED DOCUMENTARY ―Silent Epidemic: The Untold Story of Vaccines‖ 34 minutes HIGHLY RECOMMENDED! PURCHASE - http://www.gnhealthyliving.com/Scripts/pfprod-dvdscds.asp New Parent Gift Box Want a gentle way to share information with loved ones who are new to parenting? Send this gift box filled with food for thought. This gift box contains: 1. A copy of THE GREATER GOOD DVD 2. A copy of the FAST FACTS (easy talking points when speaking about the issue) 3. A vaccine primer that reviews the history and origin of vaccines as well as modern day issues 4. A Dirty Dozen guide (Shopper‘s Guide to pesticides in produce) created by the Environmental Working Group http://www.ewg.org/ 5. A hooded baby towel from Swaddle Designs http://www.swaddledesigns.com/c/Hooded-Towels/Mini-Mod-Circles--/HTMP 6. A NON-GMO Shopping Guide created by the Institute for Responsible Technology http://www.responsibletechnology.org/ 7. How to recognize signs and symptoms of vaccine reactions created by NVIC (National Vaccine Information Center) http://www.nvic.org/ Retail Price: $60 Price: $45.95 Purchase https://kd997.infusionsoft.com/app/storeFront/showProductDetail?productId=30 130.
  • 135. • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vY11w5_0ar0 One of the very few Mainstream Media Reports on anything that is negative in regards to vaccines reported on 60 minutes on the 1976 swine flu dangers and government lies. Out of 46 million people vaccinated, 4,000 developed neurological problems or died from the H1N1shots. Nothing has changed since that time. Still risky and dangerous. • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edikv0zbAlU&feature=player_embedded MUST WATCH ! 10 minutes. World s foremost expert on vaccines the late Dr. Maurice Hilleman who created over 40 vaccines and worked for Merck Pharmaceuticals tells how the HIV (aids virus) and the SV 40 cancer causing virus was introduced to humans by the Polio vaccine. • https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=CAJb01ZiJNk&NR=1 MUST WATCH! 16 minutes. Summation of vaccines • http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6VEZYQF9WlE#! ―Vaccination is not the only area that the FDA suppresses and manipulates data and lies to the world.‖ View the ―The World According to Monsanto GMO Documentary‖ DANGERS OF GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) including Food (soon GMO salmon), Plants and Insects http://www.responsibletechnology.org/ The Best site for education and information on Genetically Engineered Organisms (GMO). • http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/04/23/gmwheat.aspx?e_cid=20130428_SNL_MS_1&utm_source=snl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=ms1&utm_campaign=20130428 Video and article: New GMO Wheat May ‗Silence‘ Vital Human Genes that is necessary for carbohydrate production • http://documents.foodandwaterwatch.org/doc/MonsantoReport.pdf Profile of Chemical Company ―Monsanto Corporation‖. • http://action.responsibletechnology.org/p/salsa/web/common/public/content?content_item_KEY=11129 MUST WATCH VIDEO! 66 minutes. IF YOU USE ROUND UP OR PURCHASE YOUR FOOD FROM A GROCERY STORE THIS INTERVIEW with a world renound expert EXPOSES GMO'S AND THEIR PART IN THE RISE OF AUTISM, ALZHEIMER'S, DIABETES, HEART DISEASE, MS(Multiple Sclerosis), LEAKY GUT, OBESITY, PARKINSON'S AND TRYPTOPHAN SERATONIN ETC.!!! • http://www.i-sis.org.uk/list.php Open Letter from World Scientists to All Governments Concerning Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) 64 countries now have GE labeling laws. The U.S.A. needs a GE labeling law so we have a choice of foods we want to eat. GMO’s are banned in 27 countries because of the unbiased Accurate, independent science that proves GMO’s are dangerous to all life forms. 131.
  • 136. The One Movie You Must Have to Learn of The Dangers Of GMO Food Purchase - http://geneticroulettemovie.com/ MUST WATCH! Seeds Of Death by Gary Null http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUd9rRSLY4A 132.
  • 137. The food companies that contributed to defeat the right to know GMO labeling bill I-522 with lies and misinformation in Washington state on November 5th 2013 along with the big chemical companies Monsanto, Dow, Bayer etc. on the left of diagram. They tried hiding behind another organization so that they would not feel the back lash for contributing to prevent GMO labeling The companies that contributed to pass I-522, GMO Labeling are on the Right side of diagram VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET AND DO NOT PURCHASE THEIR PRODUCTS 133.
  • 138. FLUORIDE, a chemical waste product from the fertilizer industry that is poisoning are minds and bodies • • • • • http://www.fluoridealert.org/ - All you need to learn about the poison fluoride that is in your tap water and bottled water http://www.fluoridealert.org/fan-tv/10-facts/ - Video on the 10 important facts you need to know about the poison fluoride 20 minutes http://www.fluoridealert.org/content/bottled-water/ - Fluoride content in bottled water https://donatenow.networkforgood.org/1415005 - $75 donation gets you a flash drive with over 6,200 documents and studies. Examples of what is on the Flash Drive - http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/FAN_FLashDrive01.png , http://fluoridealert.org/wpcontent/uploads/FAN_FLashDrive02.png , http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/FAN_FLashDrive03.png , http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/FAN_FLashDrive04.png • http://fluoridealert.org/researchers/epa/ - learn the truth on fluoride and dental fluorosis, bone cancer, skeletal fluorosis etc. A TRULY SAFE CANCER CURE THAT THE GOVERNMENT, FDA AND PHARMACEUTICALS ARE SUPPRESSING • http://vimeo.com/24821365 - Part 1 of the below 3 DVD set is Free at http://vimeo.com/24821365 . ―BURZYNSKI: Cancer Is A Serious Business.‖ SAFE and NATURAL cure with only one side effect. You must drink more water. Dr. Burzynski discovered people who get cancer have low amounts or no antineoplastons and he created and patented synthetic antineoplastons curing the most difficult brain cancers while the FDA and the Pharmaceuticals tried for many years to throw him in jail on false charges so they can steal his patents and financially benefit. Dr. Burzynski was prevented by the FDA to cure cancer patients with antineoplastons and discovered a new way of curing cancer called individual gene therapy cancer treatment. It was in the news in 2013 but gave him no credit. He uses other drugs not approved for cancer for off label use by combining up to 7 or more drugs at one time and has been very successful with this therapy as well. I RECOMMEND THE BELOW COMBO PACK. This is the most complete DVD set available and you will be shocked at what the FDA does in 2013 to his clinic in Texas. Purchase https://www.burzynskimovie.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=115&Itemid=96 $44.95 • http://www.educateinspirechange.org/2013/12/cancer-curing-dr-burzynski-case.html - Good article on Burzynski and other silenced cancer cures • http://www.cancertutor.com/ NATURAL CANCER CURES 134.
  • 139. BREAST HEALTH Thermography is a Much Safer way to detect Breast Tissue Changes Up to 10 Years before Cancer is Discovered and Mammography Actually Causes Up to 10% of Breast Cancer and Detects the Disease Only when you have it. 99% of breast cancer cases have paraben esters in their breast tissue http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/04/02/toxic-parabens-on-breast-cancer-patients.aspx Dr, Sheri tenpenny on thermography and mammography http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qnREMWpqrE 2013 Documentary, THE PROMISE The truth about the routine breast screening program The film every woman needs to see What‘s it all about? The biggest catastrophe in women‘s health is taking place right now, right before our eyes. Healthy women all over the world have been disfigured, disempowered, and brainwashed, into believing that their beautiful nurturing breasts have only one objective…to kill them! The information in this film could help save your life Order your copy NOW from - http://thepromisefilm.net 135.
  • 140. AMALGAM FILLINGS, A.K. A. SILVER FILLINGS ARE POISONING YOUR MIND & BODY OVER TIME IN SPITE OF WHAT YOUR DENTIST TELLS YOU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ylnQ-T7oiA - video clip showing mercury vapor being released from your amalgam fillings as you chew or drink something warmed or hot. http://www.naturalnews.com/038030_holistic_dentist_mercury_fillings_removal.html - Finding a holistic dentist to safely remove mercury amalgam fillings http://www.naturalnews.com/007851.html - How to get mercury fillings removed without exposing yourself to toxic mercury vapor http://www.naturalnews.com/023652_mercury_clay_body.html - New Safe Detox for Mercury Amalgam Fillings http://www.naturalnews.com/039673_amalgam_fillings_mercury_dentistry.html - Why you should replace your amalgam fillings http://www.naturalnews.com/019414_dentistry_modern.html - Dentistry scams exposed: Mercury fillings and unnecessary dental surgery http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/09/09/fda-coverup-on-the-mercury-dentistry-issue.aspx - The Surprising 32Year Scandal That's Kept This Toxic Substance in Your Head http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/06/26/a-victory-for-health-fda-forced-to-admit-that-mercury-fillings-arehazardous.aspx - A Victory for Health -- FDA Forced to Admit That Mercury Fillings are Hazardous http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/09/04/mercury-poisoning-from-silver-fillings.aspx - Still Carrying Around This Potent Neurotoxin Next to Your Brain? http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/08/25/biological-dentistry.aspx - How to Find a Biological Dentist that Can Treat You Holistically COCONUT OIL & INFORMATION • • • • http://www.tropicaltraditions.com/ The best organic coconut oil. The healthiest oil on earth! Subscribe for Sales/free shipping offers! http://www.coconutresearchcenter.org/index.htm coconut info. http://www.foodrenegade.com/ http://www.foodrenegade.com/real-food-resources/ - Independently tested and certified foods of all kinds to make sure you are getting what you pay for LEARN WHAT CHEMICALS, NEURTOXINS PESTICIDES ARE IN YOUR FOOD • http://www.ewg.org/ - LEARN ABOUT THE PESTICIDES, NEUROTOXINS AND CHEMICALS THAT ARE ON THE FOOD YOU BUY FROM THE GROCERY STORE ALONG WITH THE WORST DIRTY DOZEN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES AND THE LEAST CONTAMINATED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, COSMETICS, GMO‘S, CLEANING SUPPLIES 136.
  • 141. GREAT ONLINE STORES TO PURCHASE DVD‘S, REAL SEA SALT, SUPER FOODS, SUPPLEMENTS and NATURAL HEALTH PRODUCTS FOR DOGS ETC. http://store.naturalnews.com/ Supplements, Sea salt, Hawaiian Spirulina, Chlorella, health DVD‘s etc http://shop.mercola.com/?SRC=GOOG&MED=CPC&CMP=Branded_Search_Mercola_Exact_AU&ADG=Branded_Exact&TRM=dr%20 mercola&gclid=CNPgis-hrbkCFeoWMgodRnoATQ Supplements, household, personal care, food and beverage, kids ,fitness, library(Books, CD‘s, DVD‘s etc.) http://shop.mercola.com/catalog/pets,88,0.htm Pet products. Videos on how to keep your pet healthy by Dr. Becker LEARN THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINATING YOUR DOG AND CAT TO KEEP THEM HEALTHY. IT IS NOT WHAT YOUR VET IS DOING OR TELLING YOU! http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/10/27/new-canine-vaccination-guidelines.aspx http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/05/31/what-your-vet-didnt-tell-you-about-all-those-puppy-and-kittyvaccines.aspx http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2009/08/04/when-it-comes-to-vaccinating-your-pet-less-is-more.aspx http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/02/24/reasons-to-visit-your-veterinarian.aspx http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2010/03/31/high-cost-of-pet-vaccinations.aspx GREAT DVD ON THE NATURAL WAY OF HEALING AND PREVENTING DISEASE IN OUR PETS You've learned about healthy choices for you and your family. Now, what about your pets? Did you know that the average life span of dogs and cats in America has declined significantly over the past 20 years? Could it be due in part to the food we've been feeding them or the vaccines they're given? The answers may surprise you. Join Gary Null as he interviews the world's foremost holistic animal care experts about what causes diseases in animals and what cures them ... naturally. Find out about: • The Best food for your pets • The number and type of vaccines your pet really needs • Holistic health care for birds, horses, fish and ferrets • Vitamins and herbs for your pets • How to treat common illnesses in pets, holistically • How to cope with your allergies to your pets • issues: vaccinations, euthanasia, declawing, breeders / pet stores behavioral problems • natural insect repellents for ticks and fleas • nutrients that could increase your pet's lifespan how to prevent/reverse obesity and arthritis PURCHASE - http://www.gnhealthyliving.com/Scripts/pfprodview.asp?idproduct=289 137.
  • 142. Veterinary vaccines are given to prevent disease, yet studies show that they are often debilitating and fatal. They have been linked to autoimmune and neurological disorders, including cancer, diabetes, arthritis, tumors, seizures, allergies, digestive problems, organ failure, and many other serious ailments. Many veterinarians, both conventional and holistic, are questioning the validity of annual revaccination. They are moving away from this arbitrary recommendation which is unsupported by science. Many also refuse to use certain vaccines because the disease in question is either so benign or rare that the risks associated with vaccination outweigh any promised benefit. This important book provides information on all canine and feline vaccines. It includes several personal stories of vaccine damage to family pets, as well as hundreds of studies documenting veterinary vaccine safety and efficacy problems. As a concerned pet owner, you can now make informed decisions about the health and welfare of your precious four-legged friends. Purchase http://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Guide-Dogs-Cats-Should/dp/1881217345/ref=reg_hu-rd_add_1_dp 138.
  • 143. Dogaware.com Many great links on vaccination, mercury FREE vaccines and health issues on dogs http://www.dogaware.com/health/vaccinations.html ""A team at Purdue University School of Veterinary Medicine conducted studies to determine if vaccines cause changes in the immune system of dogs that might lead to lifethreatening immune-mediated diseases. Sponsored by the Haywood Foundation, a group looking for evidence that changes in the human immune system might also be vaccine induced. It found the evidence.“ http://www.dogsadversereactions.com/scienceVaccineDamage.html Reasons not to spay or neuter your dog for at least 7 years if at all and the alternatives in the links below 1. Decrease in lifespan of more than 30% 3. Atypical Cushing‘s disease 5. Bone cancer 7. Higher rate of CCL ruptures 9. Hypothyroidism 11. Increased behavior problems • • • • 2. Hip Dysplasia 4. Cardiac tumors 6. Abnormal bone growth and development 8. Urinary incontinence in female dogs & urethral sphincter incontinence in males 10. Higher incidence of infectious disease 12. Higher incidence of adverse reactions to vaccines http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/09/30/neutering-health-risks.aspx http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2013/09/23/modified-spayprocedure.aspx?e_cid=20130923Z1_PetsNL_art_1&utm_source=petnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign =20130923Z1 http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/02/17/dangers-of-early-pet-spaying-or-neutering.aspx http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/08/15/new-dog-sterilization-technique.aspx 139.
  • 144. The Whole Dog, promoting and providing natural dog care through a practical understanding http://www.thewholedog.org/index.html RAW FOOD VS KIBBLE http://www.thewholedog.org/artcookedfood.html Animal Talk Naturally http://www.animaltalknaturally.com/ "The topic of discussion is about "marketing" parading around as" science". I will present a timeline on how vaccines have been brought into use without the "science" to support their use and the "marketing" used to disguise the vaccines- lack of a science based pedigree. Really it is precedence and not "science" and not "evidence based medicine" that is driving vaccine use." "From the use of professors who are actually just mouthpieces for the drug companies; Fort Dodge, Pfizer, Merial, Merck to the cybershills the drug corporations hire to provide positive article, comments, views, blogs etc on their products to the control they hold over veterinary schools, state medical associations, professional associations, research labs-all will be discussed. There are also ways the journals control what information is even made available to veterinary students, the seduction of students and licensed veterinary medical doctors in schools and after, how industry sponsored publications provided free to the practices claim to have "trapped the entire animal health care team" for their advertisers, the drug companies." This is her June interview on Animal Talk Naturally, she talks primarily about the mercury in animal vaccines and the disastrous effects it's having, no different than what it does to our species: http://www.animaltalknaturally.com/2013/06/12/the-impact-of-vaccines-on-the-genome-show-463/ "Examples of how these drug companies commandeer every step of the process of selecting veterinarians for school, through their training to licensing and even how they influence the careers of those in academics will be discussed. We have all been BAMBOOZLED and the public needs to know to question those whom thus far we have blindly followed their lead. This includes the very licensed medical doctors whom have misplaced their trust in the very professors whom head up clinical sciences for their veterinary schools." "This show will follow the timeline on how big business has co opted our medical health care system and what you can do to protect yourself and your entire family and your animals from being a victim of BIG BUSINESS. Don't let yourself think they care about you or your little dog, what they care about is the bottom line and the only one they are beholden to are the investors. Investors, the financial scaffolding of this trillion dollar industry who they are just might surprise you. Whole Dog Journal – Natural ways of healing, preventing disease, training, best dog food, safety review of toys etc. http://www.whole-dog-journal.com/landing/subscriptionlp012313.html?s=GL_PD_WDJGeneral&st=PPC&gclid=CPS146C2bsCFSISMwodEBkAdA $20/year for 12 issues plus bonus ―Top Dog Foods for Total Wellness How the AKC is destroying the pedigree dog by inbreeding and causing increased diseases and sickness at a alarming rate within an increasingly limiting gene pool BBC Pedigree Dogs Exposed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZMegQH1SPg Pedigree Dogs Exposed Three Years on (english) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4tTjdZJpPI 140.
  • 145. MIDWAY : This film should be seen by the entire world ! This video is about an island in the ocean at 2000 km from any other coast line. Nobody lives, only birds and yet.. you will not believe your eyes! The ocean is a plastic soup that all kinds of marine life and birds are ingesting and dying from. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN8JYhByVYg 141.
  • 146. Bag Wars -- Paper vs Plastic: The Real Truth It‘s hard to believe that in just 50-some years our thoughtless consumption has managed to turn parts of our oceans into a plastic concoction that now contains six times more plastic by weight than plankton! Must watch video with shocking photos and facts about plastic that we put into our environment and oceans and what we can do about it. Beautiful music to go along with it. One of my favorite songs http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/11/06/whatyou-need-to-know-about-plastic-bags.aspx 142.
  • 147. Another Excellent Presentation What You Will Learn In This Seminar - Over 10 Hours of Valuable Information! What Happens If You Have The Vaccination? How to Strengthen Your Immune System Naturally Alternative Choices How to Deprogram and De-Condition Why Vaccine Exemptions Are Given In The Law and Regulations Strengthening/Arming Yourself With Knowledge The Germ Theory vs. The Law of the Terrain - Antoine BeChamp, Claude Bernard The H1N1 Backstory What happened in 1958 Asian Flu Brooklyn Heights NY Did Vaccines Really Wipe Out Disease? Homeopathic Nosodes For Detoxification From The Ill Effects Of Vaccination Detoxifying Your Body of Toxins/Poisons Who Actually Got Smallpox? The Renaming of Diseases Based on Economics, Politics, But Not Science Presenter: The Future Of Vaccines Appearance of Disease vs Disease Itself The Shocking Findings of Journalist Jennifer Hyman Includes: Dr. Andrew Wakefield Violence in Vaccination - The Hidden Agenda The Myth Of Clean Vaccines The Myth Of Green Vaccines The story of Maryanne Godboldo Do You Have The Freedom To Say No To Vaccines? Price: Disease Decline in The West Before Vaccination Squalene (MF-59) and Gulf War Illness Peter Doshi, PhD Research on Influenza Statistics AND MUCH MORE! Robert Scott Bell and Jon Rappoport 10 Downloadable MP3s 1 Downloadable Documents $59.99 USD On Sale! $39.99 http://programs.webseed.com/vaccines_armed_and_dangerous.htm 143.
  • 148. THE ONE BOOK YOU MUST HAVE TO LEARN THE TRUTH Published 2013 Type Dr. Suzanne Humphries in Youtube for her many videos and interviews on vaccines Not too long ago, lethal infections were feared in the Western world. Since that time, many countries have undergone a transformation from disease cesspools to much safer, healthier habitats. Starting in the mid1800s, there was a steady drop in deaths from all infectious diseases, decreasing to relatively minor levels by the early 1900s. The history of that transformation involves famine, poverty, filth, lost cures, eugenicist doctrine, individual freedoms versus state might, protests and arrests over vaccine refusal, and much more. Today, we are told that medical interventions increased our lifespan and single-handedly prevented masses of deaths. But is this really true? Dissolving Illusions details facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, this book shows that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases. If the medical profession could systematically misinterpret and ignore key historical information, the question must be asked, ―What else is ignored and misinterpreted today?‖ Perhaps the best reason to know our history is so that the worst parts are never repeated. http://vactruth.com/2013/08/02/dissolving-illusions/ - Read the Review http://www.dissolvingillusions.com/ About the Authors, Samples of Graphs, Chapters, Photographs, Appendices http://www.amazon.com/dp/1480216895/ref=rdr_ext_tmb - PURCHASE $19.42 Paperback 144.
  • 149. THE ONE DVD YOU MUST HAVE TO LEARN THE TRUTH Released September 2013 Conventional medicine has herald the invention of vaccines as a miracle of modern science. It claims that vaccines have been proven to prevent and eradicate infectious diseases. We are told that vaccines are effective and safe, and that “herd immunity” can be achieved if a high percentage of a population is vaccinated. However does the science support these claims? Today developed countries, particularly the US, are experiencing unprecedented increases in childhood illnesses: neuro-developmental disorders, diabetes, asthma and allergies, and autoimmune disease. Simultaneously, children are being exposed to more vaccinations than at any other time in history. The number will increase dramatically with over 250 new vaccines in the pipeline. Silent Epidemic, by award winning film director Gary Null, is the first documentary to investigate thoroughly the true medical record and the historical evidence about vaccine marvels. Interviewing leading private physicians, pediatricians, immunologists, biomolecular chemists, parents of vaccine injured children, and legal experts voicing opposition to human rights violations over mandated vaccination, the film deconstructs the conventional vaccine hypothesis. What really goes into the making of a vaccine that is being injected directly into the blood stream? Rather than worthy of praise, vaccine health risks have become a scourge injuring untold numbers of children, adults and families. Viewers will be introduced into the primitive technology for making vaccines, their lifethreatening ingredients, and the hidden story Federal health agencies don’t want you to know. For people who have accepted vaccines’ promises, Silent Epidemic will certainly make them rethink its mythology. MUST WATCH! Full Documentary - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1m3TjokVU4 See all of Gary Nulls Documentaries on Natural Health and Healing –http://www.gnhealthyliving.com/Scripts/pfprod-dvdscds.asp ORDER YOUR DVD - http://www.gnhealthylivHng.com/Scripts/pfprodview.asp?idproduct=1222 145.
  • 150. Combining all three topics makes wonderful storytelling, because it‘s the same villain! You peel back the layers and see what‘s really driving our industrialized food, our insane vaccine expansion, and our love affair with pharmaceuticals- it‘s the same villain. I can‘t wait to show you what we‘ve started… So there it is. We‘re going to tackle the most important, the most controversial, emotional, and bitterly debated topics of every family‘s life. And we’re going to make some noise. Are you ready to join us? Possibly the most important documentary of our era. "BOUGHT, the hidden story behind Vaccines, Big Pharma, and your Food‖ due to release early of 2014. Here is a clip from the producer. http://www.boughtmovie.com/jh_video_update/ Please go to their page and pick out something you would like to help support the making of this important documentary. http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/bought-movie-matching-funds 146.
  • 151. VACCINES: Are They Really Safe and Effective? By Neil Z. Miller New, updated and revised 2012 edition! This is the best selling introductory vaccine book in the world. 128 Pages / Copyright © 2012 / Price: $12.95 Forewords by George Schwartz, MD and Harold Buttram, MD 30 charts and graphs / More than 900 citations ORDER THIS BOOK 505-983-1856 $12.95 or http://amazon.com $9.73 Vaccine Safety manual – ―The One Book You Cannot Be Without‖ for Concerned Families and Health Practitioners Guide to Immunization Risks & Benefits By Neil Z. Miller New, updated 2012 Edition. 352 Pages / Copyright © 2012 Foreword by Russell Blaylock, MD More than 1,000 Studies ORDER THIS BOOK 505-983-1856 $19.95 or http://amazon.com $13.21 Vaccine Safety Manual Learn more about vaccination than 99.99% of physicians know by reading this book or choose one of 4 classes available for $30-$45 each at http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccineclass.htm and learn along with a homeopath online: Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath homeopathycuresyou@gmail.com 1. Vaccine Dangers Part 1 2. Vaccine Dangers Part 2 3. Childhood Diseases: Reality, Care & Treatment (for diseases with vaccines associated with them) 4. Holistic Baby & Toddler Care Class 147.
  • 152. Vaccination Is Not Immunization 3rd Ed. Third Edition (2013) [Paperback] By Dr. Tim O‘Shea An excellent evidenced-based book with all work cited. Gets to the core and facts. Easy to understand and well written. http://www.amazon.com $28.00 How to Raise A Healthy Child In Spite of Your doctor Published May12, 1987 One of the many books I have in my library. I highly recommend this book as it is a common sense approach to raising a healthy child without the risks of vaccination. http://www.amazon.com $7.51 148.
  • 153. Book description http://www.amazon.com $21.59 This book provides parents with a comprehensive, scientifically based guide to the facts, myths, problems and solutions associated with raising a vaccine free child. It helps parents protect their children both from the wiles of the vaccine industry and from harmful germs. There are no trendy anti-vaccination myths in this book. The information is fully referenced and factually based. Readers will learn that immunization is not the reason for the absence of some infectious diseases, that insidious, long-term side effects of vaccination are very common, and that there is a media blackout on the topics of vaccine damage and vaccine failures. Understanding the difference between childhood diseases and the other infectious diseases is the key to understanding immunization. Modern medicine fails to recognize that childhood illnesses are self-resolving, and prescribes interventions that increase the risk of complications. Raising a Vaccine Free Child explains why the self-resolving diseases, like measles, mumps, chickenpox and rubella, do not need intervention, but do need proper care to prevent complications from developing. It also advises parents on how to bring children safely through childhood diseases, and discusses the prevention and treatment of the malevolent infectious diseases that are not selfresolving, such as polio and tetanus. Raising a Vaccine Free Child helps parents of vaccine free children cope with aggression from individuals and with intimidation from the medical authorities, and by revealing how the myth of herd immunity was concocted, it empowers parents to withstand the accusation that they are spoiling herd immunity. The book demonstrates that the long-term side effects of vaccination have not been assessed at any time in any country. A look at the history of vaccination reveals that it is an unscientific procedure that is based on falsehood, cruelty and supposition. Impossible Cure http://amazon.com $15.37 The Promise of Homeopathy provides an in-depth and exciting account of the history, philosophy, science, and experience of homeopathic medicine. At the core of Impossible Cure is the amazing story of how Amy Lansky's son was cured of autism with homeopathy. It also includes dozens of other testimonials of homeopathic cures for a variety of physical, mental, and emotional conditions. Impossible Cure will serve as an invaluable guide to anyone interested in learning more about this intriguing form of health care. 149.
  • 154. Curing the Incurable, Vitamin C, Infectious Disease and Toxins Don't just accept a casual, unenlightened assessment of what high-dose vitamin C can and cannot do. Read the truth for yourself... High-dose vitamin C has been able to cure or contribute to the cure of many common infectious diseases, such as hepatitis and polio. Here's documented evidence that vitamin C is the treatment of choice for many potential fatal infectious diseases and toxins. Dr. Levy has taken great care to research, document, and report the vital truths about vitamin C — he cites over 1,200 scientific references. Curing the Incurable provides the information you need to most effective use vitamin C to: Prevent, cure, reverse and/or greatly improve a massive list of health conditions. Cut your mortality risk (from all causes) by as much as 50%. Boost your immune system and energy levels to optimum levels. Optimize blood and intracellular levels of vitamin C. Dramatically increase bio-availability (up to 800% or more) without increasing your dose size. Avoid gastric discomfort, the diarrhea, and increased urination that prove most of your large doses of vitamin C are headed for the sewer. And much, much more. Purchase - http://www.medfoxpub.com/medicalnews/product/S-CTI/Curing-the-Incurable/Amazing-results-in-the-treatment-of-diseaseand-toxins/ $19.95 150.
  • 155. Vitamin C: the Facts, The Fiction, and the Law High-doses of vitamin C can cure disease and neutralize the poisons we're exposed to every day. Hear the facts directly from the foremost vitamin C expert in the world. What you learn can change your life and quite possibly save the life of a loved one. Purchase – $29.95 http://www.medfoxpub.com/medicalnews/product/V-VC/Vitamin-C-the-Facts-TheFiction-and-the-Law/Powerful-truth-for-using-and-defending-the-use-of-vitamin-C/ 151.
  • 156. Living Proof! See the miraculous story of Allan Smith, a New Zealand farmer, who was snatched from certain death because family members successfully fought for administration of a simple, proven vitamin therapy; a therapy the medical establishment still refuses to acknowledge even in the face of "Living Proof." Never has the medical bias against a proven therapy been so blatantly obvious in a mainstream media report. This riveting documentary produced and aired by 60 Minutes, reveals the healing power of high-dose vitamin C and is fueling a patient-driven healthcare revolution! Purchase – $19.95 http://www.medfoxpub.com/medicalnews/product/V-LP/Living-Proof/The-documentaryseries-thats-fueling-a-healthcare-revolution/ 152.
  • 157. Stop America's #1 Killer! provides overwhelming evidence — including over 650 scientific references — that some conditions which we now consider as risk factors for Coronary Heart Diseases (CHD): all start with the depletion of arterial vitamin C levels (arterial scurvy) and are often just the body's way of compensating for the weakness in arterial walls caused by arterial scurvy. This book also offers a protocol for preventing and reversing the arterial blockages that cause heart attacks. You'll also get answers to these and other questions: • How can cholesterol levels that are too low actually increase your risk for other debilitating and life-threatening diseases? • How can traditional dental procedures start a continuing process that destroys your heart and coronary arteries? • What's the important link between vitamin C, triglycerides and HDL? • What should high levels of lipoprotein(a) tell your heart doctor? • Which amino acid, coupled with vitamin C, stops anginal pain? • Which hormone transports vitamin C into arterial cells and what factors impede the hormone's production? • How are histamine and anti-histamine levels in the blood related to arterial plaque? • What is the surprising relationship of vitamin C and calcium that impacts heart health and osteoporosis? • How is periodontal health directly related to heart health? • What minerals (found in many supplements) can dramatically increase your chance of heart attack and risk of cancer? • Which season of the year produces the highest number of heart attacks, why, and how can you counteract the affect? • How can the way you eat your food have as much of an impact on heart health as what you eat? • What foods should you avoid and why? (Hint: It's a very short list and not like any you have ever seen — you will probably be shocked by the foods that aren't on the list). • and many more. Take the "chance" out of your heart's health Order Stop America's #1 Killer! today. – $19.95 http://www.medfoxpub.com/cgi-bin/htmlos.cgi/00440.10.273432677115086734 153.
  • 158. New Parent Gift Box Want a gentle way to share information with loved ones who are new to parenting? Send this gift box filled with food for thought. This gift box contains: 1. A copy of THE GREATER GOOD DVD 2. A copy of the FAST FACTS (easy talking points when speaking about the issue) 3. A vaccine primer that reviews the history and origin of vaccines as well as modern day issues 4. A Dirty Dozen guide (Shopper‘s Guide to pesticides in produce) created by the Environmental Working Group http://www.ewg.org/ 5. A hooded baby towel from Swaddle Designs http://www.swaddledesigns.com/c/Hooded-Towels/Mini-Mod-Circles--/HTMP 6. A NON-GMO Shopping Guide created by the Institute for Responsible Technology http://www.responsibletechnology.org/ 7. How to recognize signs and symptoms of vaccine reactions created by NVIC (National Vaccine Information Center) http://www.nvic.org/ Retail Price: $60 Price: $45.95 Purchase https://kd997.infusionsoft.com/app/storeFront/showProductDetail?productId=30 154.
  • 159. Vaccine Book List by Vactruth.com 1. A Century Of Vaccination And What It Teaches, by W. Scott Tebb, M.M.A., M.D. 2. A Criminal Consequence of Vaccine Injury: Misdiagnosed Shaken Baby Syndrome, by Alan G. Phillips, Esq. 3. A Shot in the Dark, by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fisher 4. A Stolen Life, by Marge Grant 5. Adverse Events Associated With Childhood Vaccines: Evidence Bearing on Causality, by Kathleen R. Stratton, Ph.D., Cynthia J. Howe 6. AIDS And the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic, by Alan Cantwell, M.D. 7. AIDS, the Mystery and the Solution, by Alan Cantwell, M.D. 8. Anthrax a Deadly Shot in the Dark: Unmasking the Truth Behind a Hazardous Vaccine, by Lt. Col. Thomas S. Heemsra 9. Behavioral Problems in Childhood: The Link to Vaccination, by Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. 10. Bodily Matters: The Anti-Vaccination Movement in England 1853-1907, by Nadja Durbach, Ph.D., M.A., B.A. 11. Changing the Course of Autism, by Bryan Jepson, M.D. 12. Children With Starving Brains, by Jaquelyn McCandless, M.D. 13. Confessions of a Medical Heretic, by Robert S. Mendelsohn, M.D. 14. Dangers of Compulsory Immunizations: How to Avoid Them Legally, by Tom Finn,Esq. 15. Detoxify Or Die, by Sherry A. Rogers, M.D. 16. Dissent in Medicine: Nine Doctors Speak Out, by Robert S. Mendelsohn, M.D. 17. Don't Vaccinate Before You Educate, by Mayer Eisenstein M.D., J.D., M.P.H. 18. Dr. Mary's Monkey: How the Unsolved Murder of a Doctor, a Secret Laboratory in New Orleans and Cancer-Causing Monkey Viruses are Linked to Lee Harvey Oswald, ...Assassination and Emerging Global Epidemics, by Edward T. Haslam 19. Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional?, by Leonard Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H. 20. Everybody's Guide to Homeopathic Medicines, by Stephen Cummings, M.D. 21. Every Second Child, by Archie Kalokerinos, M.D., M.B.B.S., F.A.P.M. 22. Evidence of Harm, by David Kirby 23. Fear of the Invisible, by Janine Roberts 24. Fowl! Bird Flu: It's Not What You Think, by Sherri Tenpenny, D.O. 25. Germs, Biological Warfare, Vaccinations: What you Need to Know, by Gary Null, Ph.D. 26. Horrors of Vaccination Exposed and Illustrated by Chas. M. Higgins, M.D. 27. How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of Your Doctor, by Robert S. Mendelsohn, M.D. 28. ICD-999 Vaccine Induced Diseases: The Chronic Serum Sickness Postulate, by Patrick Jordan 29. Immunization Dice, by Michael J. Brody, Ph.D. 30. Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, by Walene James 31. Immunizations: The Terrible Risks Your Children Face That Your Doctor Won't Reveal,by Robert S. Mendelsohn, M.D. 32. Impossible Cure: The Promise of Homeopathy, by Amy Lansky, Ph.D. 155.
  • 160. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. Inoculation Dangers to Travelers, etc., by Maurice Beddow Bayly, M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P. Inside the FDA: The Business and Politics Behind the Drugs We Take and the Food We Eat, by Fran Hawthorne Jabs, Jenner and Juggernauts, by Jenny Craig Just a Little Prick, by Peter and Hilary Butler Leicester: SANITATION versus VACCINATION, by J.T. Biggs Lethal Injections Why Immunizations Don't Work and the Damage they Cause, by William Douglass, M.D. Medicine On Trial, by Charles B. Inlander, Lowell S. Levine, Ed Weinter Mercury: The Winged Messenger, by Courtney L. Zietzke On the Take: How Medicine's Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger Your Health, by Jerome Kassirer, M.D. Out of Silence: An Autistic Boy's Journey into Language and Communication, by Russell Martin Pasteur, Plagiarist, Impostor! The Germ Theory Exploded!, by R. B. Pearson Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plt, by Alan Cantwell, M.D. Racketeering in Medicine: The Suppression of Alternatives, by James P. Carter, M.D. Raising a Vaccine Free Child, by Wendy Lydall Saying No to Vaccines: A Resource Guide For All Ages, by Sherri Tenpenny, D.O. Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research?,by ZSheldon Krimsky, M.S., Ph.D. Science, Money and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion, by Daniel S.Greenberg Selling Sickness: How the World's Biggest Pharmaceutical Companies Are Turning Us All Into Patients, by Ray Moynihan and Alan Cassells Shaken Baby Syndrome Diagnosis on Shaky Ground, by Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. Silenced Witnesses: v.II: The Parents Story: The Denial of Vaccine Damage by Government, Corporations and the Media Some Call it AIDS: I Call it Murder, The Connection Between Cancer, AIDS, Immunizations, and Genocide, by Eva Snead M.D. State of Immunity: The Politics of Vaccination in Twentieth Century America, by James Colegrove, Ph.D., M.P.H. Swine Flu Exposed, by Eleanore McBean, Ph.D., N.D. Terror of Pediatric Medicine, by Mark Sircus, Ac., O.M.D. The Authoritative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions, by Alan G. Phillips, Esq. The Case Against Vaccination, by Walter Hadwen, J.P., M.D., L.R.C.p., M.R.C.S., L.S.A. The Chickenpox Vaccine: A new epidemic of disease and corruption, by Mark Orrin and Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D. The Decline of Tuberculosis Despite "Protective" Vaccination, by Gerhard Buchwald, M.D. The Fraud of Vaccination, by Walter Hadwen, J.P., M.D., L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S., L.S.A. The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed, by Mike Adams The Hidden Dangers in Polio Vaccine, by Eleanor McBean, Ph.D., N.D. The Immunization Decision, by Randall Neustaedter, O.M.D. The Immunization Resource Guide: Where to Find Answers to All Your Questions About Childhood Vaccinations, by Diane Rozario 156.
  • 161. 66. The Infant Survival Guide: Protecting Your Baby from the Dangers of Crib Death, Vaccines and Other Environmental Hazards, by Lendon H. Smith, M.D. 67. The Medical Mafia: How to Get Out of It Alive and Take Back Our Health and Wealth, by Guylaine Lanctot, M.D. 68. The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts about Vaccination, by Eleanor McBean, Ph.D.,N.D. 69. The Sanctity of Human Blood: Vaccination is Not Immunization, by Tim O'Shea, D.C. 70. The Story of The Salk Anti-poliomyelitis Vaccine, by Maurice Beddow Bayly, M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P. 71. The Trial of The Medical Mafia, by Joachim Schafer 72. The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It, by Marcia Angell, M.D. 73. The Vaccination Connection, by Sue Marston 74. The Vaccination Nonsense, by Gerhard Buchwald, M.D. 75. The Vaccination Problem, by Joseph Swan 76. The Vaccine Guide: Making an Informed Choice , by Randall Neustaedter, O.M.D. 77. The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of A Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus, Contaminated Polio Vaccines, and the Millions of Americans Exposed, by Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacher 78. Universal Immunization: Medical Miracle or Masterful Mirage, by Raymond Obomsawin, Ph.D. 79. Vaccine-Free Prevention and Treatment with Homeopathy, by Jeffrey J. Starre, M.D. 80. Vaccines: The Risks, the Benefits, the Choices, a Resource Guide for Parents, by Sherri Tenpenny, D.O. 81. Vaccines: Vital or Vulnerable, by Archie Kalokerinos, M.D., M.B.B.S., F.A.P.M., Glen Dettman, A.M.M., B.A., Ph.D., F.A.P.M. 82. Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows Vaccinations are a Medical Assault on the Immune System, by Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. 83. Vaccination-A Business Based on Fear, by Gerhard Buchwald, M.D. 84. Vaccination-A Fatal Error, by Bronwyn Hancock, B.S., Cert. Nutr. 85. Vaccination-A Parent's Dilemma, by Greg Beattie 86. Vaccination and Behavioral Disorders: a review of the controversy, by Greg Wilson 87. Vaccinations & Immunization: Dangers, Delusions and Alternatives, by Leon Chaitow, D.O., N.D. 88. Vaccination, Social Violence and Criminality, the Medical Assault on the American Brain, by Harris L. Coulter, Ph.D. 89. Vaccination: The Cruel Deception, by Christian Borleis 90. Vaccination: "The Hidden" Facts, by Ian Sinclair, Dipl. Nutr. 91. Vaccination The Silent Killer: A Clear And Present Danger, by Ida Honorof, Eleanor McBean, PhD., N.D. 92. Vaccinations: Deception & Tragedy, by Michael Dye 93. Vaccinations: The Issue of Our Times, by Peggy O'Mara 94. Vaccinations: The Rest of the Story, by Peggy O'Mara 95. Vaccinations: The Untold Truth, by Yves DeLatte 96. Vaccine A: The Covert Government Experiment That's Killing Our Soldiers-And Why GIs Are Only the First Victims, by Gary Matsumoto 157.
  • 162. 97. Vaccine Safety Manual for Concerned Families and Health Practitioners, by Neil Z. Miller 98. Vaccines: An Ounce of Prevention? Or a Pound of Death?, by Keidi Obi Awadu 99. Vaccines Are Dangerous: A Warning to the Black Community, by Yoshua Barak 100. Vaccines Are Dangerous: A Warning to the Global Community 2nd Edtion, by CurtisCost 101. Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective, by Neil Z. Miller 102. What About Immunizations? Exposing the Vaccine Philosophy, by Cynthia Cournoyer 103. What Every Parent Should Know About Childhood Immunizations, by Jamie Murphy 104. What The Pharmaceutical Companies Don't Want You To Know About Vaccines, byTodd Elsner, D.C. 105. What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Children's Vaccinations, by Stephanie Cave, M.D. F.A.A.F.P. 106. When Your Doctor Is Wrong, Hepatitis B Vaccine and Autism, by Judy Converse, M.P.H., R.D. 107. White Lies: A Tale of Babies, Vaccines, and Deception, by Sarah Collins Honenberger, J.D. 108. Your Personal Guide to Immunization Exemptions, by Grace Girdwain 109. The Authoritative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions (e-book), by Vaccine Rights Attorney Alan Phillips 158.
  • 163. The key is to get over the fear of the diseases. Learn all you can about each disease. Vaccines do not confer immunity. We must remember that it is not only the ingredients that make up a vaccine that is cause for concern and the volume of vaccines given in a short time period but the proven scientific and medical fact that vaccination causes chronic systemic (body) and brain inflammation and can last for 2 years after the last vaccination, causing damage before you or your child is diagnosed with a neurological or autoimmune disease, thus allowing the governments, pharmaceuticals and the medical community to easily dismiss that a vaccine did cause the disease, disability or death without any proven benefit to society. There is not an insurance underwriter who will offer liability coverage for drug companies in the event any of their vaccines cause death or disability to the recipient. Laws exist that prevent suing the gov‘t, the pharmaceuticals and your physician for vaccine damage. The vaccine injury court was created because the Government and pharmaceuticals know that vaccines cause disease, lifelong disabilities and death which make you and/or your child lifelong consumers for the drug companies. In March 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) agreed to hear Bruesewitz v. Wyeth and announced that vaccines are ―unavoidably unsafe‖ and that Americans do not have the right to sue for a defective vaccine design, effectively taking away the incentive (lawsuits) to try and create a safe and effective vaccine. We really do not know what all of the ingredients are that go into creating a vaccine because the government and pharmaceuticals say it is proprietary and the pharmaceuticals do not have to list it on the package insert as in the case of peanut oil. Many officials who work for the FDA, CDC and sit on the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) have conflicts of interest in receiving pharmaceutical funding for research or to create drugs and vaccines and are hired by the pharmaceuticals after serving their position in the government. So how can we trust the Government and pharmaceuticals who say they are protecting our health? These reasons alone should set off many red flags and cause you to error on the side of caution not to vaccinate or at the very least question vaccination or modify the vaccine schedule. Who did you look up to for safety and protection when you were a child. Your parents. Every life is precious and irreplaceable, not simply part of the herd. It is your responsibility to take care of them and that means to ask questions, do your research and make an informed decision. Your baby has no voice and no choice. Their welfare is up to you. Do not be intimidated or coerced by health officials, school officials, your physician or with the latest gimmick by the pharmaceuticals with a personal message from the governor of your state in a hallmark greeting card that includes a vaccination schedule and height chart. This is ‗friendly‘ pressure to vaccinate ―a more personal and authoritative touch.‖ After reading this PowerPoint, you will know much more than 99.99% of all physicians. Please do not fail your children! The 1:4000 chance of adverse reactions could be you or your child. 159.
  • 164. After reading this power point you will know more about vaccination than the majority of health care workers. It is easy to be mislead when we so easily give up our autonomy and our ability to reason and think for ourselves to those who we entrust our health and lives with. I tried to answer many questions with this Power Point. Are vaccines safe and effective? What are the adverse effects and are there any benefits? What are some of the ways that studies are skewed for a favorable outcome? What does the evidence-based science really show? As we have learned a vaccine is not just a benign solution of a virus and sterile water. There are many chemicals, toxins, heavy metals, carcinogens and detergents linked to many different diseases and death in exchange for the belief that vaccination will protect you. If so, at what cost? Provided in this presentation were many documented cases using official government data and statistics provided from around the world and throughout history that did not support the theory of vaccination and the lack of any sound evidence-based science behind the theory of vaccination. The valid evidence-based science showed that vaccination is a powerful myth and belief system that has not been proven at any scientific level. Most studies are funded by the pharmaceuticals and many Government agencies have financial ties to the pharmaceuticals. There are conflicts of interest with the professionals that make decisions on vaccinations. Some are co-inventors of vaccines like Dr. Paul Offit (rotavirus vaccine) who greatly financially benefitted from MERCK and also stated “A more practical way to determine the diversity of the immune response would be to estimate the number of vaccines to which a child could respond at one time…. each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10, 000 vaccines at any one time’’. Meanwhile $20,000,000 was awarded over a lifetime for care of Hannah Poling when she developed Autism after only 9 vaccines. Mr. Offit was on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) from 1998-2003 and voted three times to include his rotavirus vaccine in the schedule. Some have worked for pharmaceuticals before entering a government position or start working for the pharmaceuticals after they leave their position. The pharmaceuticals and government agencies refuse to perform the necessary studies of vaccinated versus unvaccinated that is now being funded by private donations. Official CDC documents also proved that vaccination is built on a belief system and what the Government and health officials want us to believe is far from the reality. The CDC and FDA spin a web of half truths, and untruths along with the FEAR factor to fuel their agenda of 100% vaccination at all costs! If vaccines were proven safe and effective and they did not contain all of the dangerous chemicals, heavy metals, toxins, carcinogens and were truly a benign substance, I may consider vaccination. I know the best and only way for lifelong immunity is to strengthen your immune system not through injecting chemicals and viruses into your body and bypassing all of our natural defenses but by living a healthy lifestyle and acquiring the diseases naturally as I did when I was very young. The adverse effects of vaccination are real and can be lifelong, costly and even deadly. How often are we fully informed about the true risks of vaccination and what is being injected into your body or sound advice on safe natural ways of preventing disease? I would bet not very often. Typically, a patient goes into a physicians office to receive a vaccination, sits down and nothing is ever discussed with you. You just assume that it is safe and effective. You are never told what is being injected into you along with any risks because many physicians are not aware of this information. Some would label me antivaccine. I consider myself fully informed and pro-information. We rarely if ever hear the information that is presented in this presentation. This is just the tip of a mountain of evidence that supports why we should not vaccinate. This is what it really means to be fully informed. Improved sanitation & hygiene, hand washing, nutrition and clean drinking water and true natural (not the vaccine induced illusion) herd immunity are the reasons why disease naturally disappeared. Are there any benefits of vaccination that outweigh the risks? Are vaccines safe and do they prevent disease as advertised? Not according to history, evidence-based science or the government‘s own documents. 160.
  • 165. Work Cited O‘Shea, Dr. T. (2012). Vaccination is not Immunization second edition. Immunition Ltd. Tenpenny, Dr, S. J.(2008). Saying NO to Vaccines. Cleveland, Ohio: Tenpenny publishing Tenpenny, Dr. S. J.(Director). (2010). Flu and Flu Vaccines what’s coming through that needle. Tenpenny Productions Tenpenny, Dr. S. J.(Director). (2006). Vaccines What CDC Documents and Science Reveal. Tenpenny Productions Tenpenney, Dr S. J.(Director). (2006). Vaccines The Risks, The Benefits, The Choices second edition. Tenpenny Productions University of Calgary ( Director). (2008) Effects of Mercury on Brain Neuron Degeneration https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ipi3OneIw0A Evaccines (2012) 2012 Flu Vaccines Still Contain Mercury. Retrieved January 20,2013 from http://experimentalvaccines.org/2012/11/16/flu-vaccines-contain-mercury State of California (2013) Thimerosal (Mercury) Law. Retrieved Janruary 20, 2013 http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/immunize/Pages/CaliforniaThimerosalLaw.aspx Retrieved January 23, 2013http://www.whale.to/vaccines/hadwen1.html Thomas R. E., Jefferson T., Lasserson T. J. (2010) Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who work with the elderly. Retrieved January 20, 2013 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20166073 England, C. (2012) 4,250% Increase in Fetal Deaths Reported to VAERS After Flu Shot Given to Pregnant Women. Retrieved January 25, 2013 from http://vactruth.com/2012/11/23/flu-shot-spikes-fetal-death/#!prettyPhoto Blaylock, Dr. R. (2012) The Deadly Impossibility Of Herd Immunity Through Vaccination. Retrieved January 28, 2013 from http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/02/18/the-deadly-impossibility-of-herd-immunity-through-vaccination-by-dr-russell-blaylock/ 161.
  • 166. Jefferson, Dr. T. (2005) Effectiveness of Flu Shots Wildly Overestimated. Retrieved January 30, 2013 from http://vran.org/about-vaccines/specific-vaccines/influenza-vaccine-flu-shot/effectiveness-of-flu-shots-wildly-overestimated/ Tebb, W. (1881) SANITATION, NOT VACCINATION THE TRUE Protection against Small-Pox. A Paper read before the Second International Congress of Anti- Vaccinators, held at Cologne, October 12, 1881. Retrieved January 30, 2013 from http://www.whale.to/vaccine/tebb1.html Marshall, Dr. J., N.D.,Ph.D. (2008) Was Smallpox Vaccine Really A Great Success? Retrieved February 1, 2013from http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/01/02/was-smallpox-vaccine-really-a-great-success.aspx Retrieved February 1, 2013from http://www.whale.to/vaccines/tilden.html Hodge, J. W. (1901) THE VACCINATION SUPERSTITION . Retrieved February 1, 2013 from http://www.vaclib.org/basic/superstition.htm Retrieved February 1, 2013 from http://www.whale.to/v/dettman.html Craig, J.BSN, MA, Ph.D. (2010) Smallpox Vaccine: Origins of Vaccine Madness. Retrieved February 1, 2013 from http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2010/02/26/smallpox-vaccine-origins-of-vaccine-madness NIH news (2010) Vaccinating Children against Flu Helps Protect Wider Community. Retrieved February 8, 2013 from http://www.nih.gov/news/health/mar2010/niaid-09.htm NOTE ! this is an example of a typical invalid vaccine study in order to try and validate their myth to mandate vaccination on everyone. The study is a comparison of two vaccines instead of a comparison of a vaccine and a placebo which would be used in a valid evidence-based study. Shaw, B. (2011) Many vaccines contain polysorbate 80 which can cause anaphylactic shock. Retrieved February 8, 2013 from http://www.naturalnews.com/033406_vaccines_polysorbate_80.html Child Health safety Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics. Retrieved February 10, 2013 from http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/#LeicsTable_21 The Refusers. Photos. Retrieved February 10, 2013 from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=497511166953028&set=a.204714979565983.46184.118909591479856&type=1&theater 162.
  • 167. Kern, J. K., Geier, D.A., Audhya, T., King, P.G., Sykes L.K., Geier, M. R. (2012) Evidence of parallels between mercury intoxication and the brain pathology in autism. Retrieved February 14, 2013 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22810216 Child Health safety (2011) Paul Offit – Liar “Doctor of Vaccine Profit” Voted His Patented Vaccine For US Children When On Vaccine Safety Committee. Retrieved February 15, 2013 from http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2011/04/23/offit-congressional-reprimand Attkisson, S. (2010) Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award. Retrieved February 15, 2013 from http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20015982-10391695.html Humphries, S. (2012) In Vaccines We Trust? Paul Offit threatens religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions. A response by Suzanne Humphries, MD. Retrieved February 15, 2013 from http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/08/26/paul-offit-threatens-religious-andphilosphical-vaccine-exemptions-a-respose-by-suzanne-humphries-md England, C. (2013) Will New Changes to Autism Diagnosis Leave Your Child in the Cold While Filling Big Pharma’s Pockets? Retrieved March 9, 2013 from file:///C:/Users/user/Desktop/Will%20New%20Changes%20to%20Autism%20Diagnosis%20Leave%20Your%20Child%20in%20the%20C old%20While%20Filling%20Big%20Pharma%E2%80%99s%20Pockets%20%20_%20VacTruth.com.htm Mercola, Dr. J.(2010) This Cooking Oil is a Powerful Virus-Destroyer and Antibiotic. Retrieved March 16, 2013 from http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/10/22/coconut-oil-and-saturated-fats-can-make-you-healthy.aspx 163.
  • 168. From a doctors office who tries to use fear to coerce a parent into vaccinating her child ALL UNTRUE AND BLOWN WAY OUT OF PROPORTION TO REALITY