Relations Between Microseismicity and Surface Creep Along Major Strike-Slip Faults
1. 5/29/2015 Relations Between Microseismicity and Surface Creep Along Major StrikeSlip Faul
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AGUFMED31B1207M 1/2
Sign on
SAO/NASA ADS Physics Abstract Service
· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· Reads History
·
· Translate This Page
Title: Relations Between Microseismicity and Surface Creep Along Major StrikeSlip
Faults of the San Francisco Bay Region (CA)
Authors: Mascorro, M. T.; Caskey, J.; Lienkaemper, J. J.
Affiliation: AA(San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences 1600 Holloway
Ave., San Francisco, CA 94132 United States marina@mascorro.us), AB(San
Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences 1600 Holloway Ave.,
San Francisco, CA 94132 United States caskey@sfsu.edu), AC(United States
Geological Survey MS977, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025
United States jlienk@usgs.gov)
Publication: American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2005, abstract #ED31B1207
Publication Date: 12/2005
Origin: AGU
Keywords: 7223 Earthquake interaction, forecasting, and prediction (1217, 1242)
Bibliographic Code: 2005AGUFMED31B1207M
Abstract
Few studies have examined temporal relations between microseismicity and creep. Most strikeslip faults
in the San Francisco Bay Area have sections that exhibit fault creep, with varying rates of 118 mm/yr. It
is well known that creeping faults commonly show high microseismicity rates. It has also been shown
that rates and character of creep respond to regional stress changes associated with large earthquakes
(e.g., 1989, M7 Loma Prieta). Relations between creep behavior and microseismicity were examined
using alinement array data acquired from the San Francisco State University Creep Monitoring project
collected at 21 sites since 1979 and seismicity data from the Northern California Earthquake Data
Catalog. Catalog completeness was tested using the GutenbergRichter relation and found to be complete
for M ≥ 1 for the Bay Area since 1979. We conducted catalog searches within a 5 to 10 km radius of each
creep monitoring site, finding that sites with higher creep rates generally show higher seismicity rates.
Creep data and seismicity histogram plots were compared over identical time periods and examined for
correlations between details of creep behavior and seismic events or temporal variations in seismicity.
We largely focused on sites that show episodic creep behavior or significant variations in creep rates over
time. Creep episodes sometimes occur at nearly regular time intervals. Many sites also exhibit temporal
clusters of seismicity, also at nearly regular time intervals, but the apparent frequencies of these clusters
are different than the frequency of creep episodes. These observations suggest little or no correspondence
between seismicity patterns and creep behavior. One notable exception occurs at the north end of the
creeping section of the San Andreas fault, where creep nearly stopped in 199798 and resumed to a rate
of 11 mm/yr following a M4.4 earthquake and it's aftershocks. Finally, we determined that the
cumulative moment from seismicity in the vicinity of creep sites is generally two orders of magnitude