1. CLSU Intramurals
2012: In The Eyes of
Athletes/ Non-Athletes

2. Problem Statement
This study required to answer the following questions:





How the sports fee used in conducting intramurals?
What is/are the reasons why there is limited number of athlete per
college?
What is/are possible strategy to encourage the students to
participate in intramurals?
What were the problems encountered during the CLSU Intramurals
2012?
What is/are the effects of a student- led activity to the students?

3. Research Objectives
The research study designed to know the perception of the CLSU
students in the Intramurals 2012.
Specifically¸ this study aimed to:





To know if the sports fee of the students was used in a proper way.
To determine if the qualification of an athlete is right or not.
To identify the best motivator for the students to participate in
intramurals.
To identify the problems encountered during CLSU Intramurals 2012.
To determine the effect of a student- led activity to the students.

4. Review of Related Literature
“Campus intramural sports as a service provided to
offer students an opportunity to physically participate in
fitness and sport activities. Another important aspect of
intramurals and the relationship it has with college
students is the time commitment to campus recreation
increases¸ their satisfaction with their campus
experience increases.”
-Lindsey et al (2009)

5. Methodology
Method of Research
Descriptive Method
Techniques Used
Survey Questionnaire
Participants
Athletes and Non-Athletes

6. Findings
For Athletes

7. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 1 Gender of the Respondents
35%
Male
Female
65%

8. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 2 Year Level of the Respondents
5%
10%
1st
2nd
20%
3rd
4th
5th
6th
65%

9. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 3 Preparation Done Before The Intramurals
Everyday practice
6%
Eat healthy foods
11%
31%
9%
Avoid cigarettes
Sleep well
Avoid alcohol
15%
Invite friends to watch
6%
22%
Take vitamins
Others

10. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 4 Type of Incentive Preferred
14%
Grade
Cash
Others
86%

11. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 5 Level of Interest In Intramurals
7%
28%
15%
50%
Rate 1
Rate 2
Rate 3
Rate 4
Rate 5

12. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 6 Reason For Participating In Intramurals
3%
7%
26%
To enjoy
For grade incentive
For cash incentive
23%
To show skills
To give honor to college
22%
For popularity
Others
17%
2%

13. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 7 Awareness Regarding CLSU Intramurals As A
Student-led Activity
30%
Yes
No
70%

14. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 8 Comment About The Reason For Conducting
Intramurals
45%
5%
10%
7.5% 5%
5% 7.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
2.5% 2.5% 2.5%

15. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 9 Comment About The Way CLSU Intramural 2012
Was Conducted
20%
15%
12.5%
7.5%
7.5%
5%
2.5% 2.5%2.5%
5%
2.5%2.5%
5%
2.5%
2.5%2.5%
2.5%

16. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 10 Preparation of ISPEAR for the Intramurals
45%
28%
17%
10%
0%
rate 1
rate 2
rate 3
rate 4
rate 5

17. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 11 Involvement of Their Coach
40%
23%
12%
rate 1
15%
10%
rate 2
rate 3
rate 4
rate 5

18. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 12 Relationship With Their Coach
40%
22%
18%
10%
10%
rate 1
rate 2
rate 3
rate 4
rate 5

19. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 13 Teamwork Established Among Their Co-players
33%
35%
18%
7%
7%
rate 1
rate 2
rate 3
rate 4
rate 5

20. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 14 Quality of Food Served
40%
25%
17%
13%
5%
rate 1
rate 2
rate 3
rate 4
rate 5

21. Findings (For Athletes)
Fig. 15 Participation of The Non-athletes
43%
22%
15%
10%
rate 1
10%
rate 2
rate 3
rate 4
rate 5

22. Findings
For Non-Athletes

23. Findings (For Non-Athletes)
Fig. 16 Gender of the Respondents
Male
40%
Female
60%

24. Findings (For Non-Athletes)
Fig. 17 Year Level of the Respondents
13%
2%
15%
1st
2nd
3rd
10%
15%
4th
5th
6th
45%

25. Findings (For Non-Athletes)
Fig. 18 Satisfaction in CLSU Intramurals 2012
Yes
No
43%
57%

26. Findings (For Non-Athletes)
Fig. 19 Level of Interest Regarding CLSU Intramurals
2012
2%
10%
Rate 1
22%
Rate 2
Rate 3
Rate 4
33%
Rate 5
33%

27. Findings (For Non-Athletes)
Fig. 20 Reason For Attending CLSU Intramurals 2012
2%
to cheer the
representatives of our
college
35%
to provide food for the
athletes
to enjoy the intramurals
47%
for the checking of my
attendance
2%
14%
Others

28. Findings (For Non-Athletes)
Fig. 21 Awareness Regarding CLSU Intramurals 2012 As A Student-led
Activity
15%
Yes
No
85%

29. Findings (For Non-Athletes)
Fig. 22 Perception In The Reason Of Conducting
Intramurals
27.5%
7.5%
5%
5%
2.5% 2.5%
7.5%
7.5%
2.5%2.5%
5% 5% 5%
2.5%
5%
5%
2.5%

30. Findings (For Non-Athletes)
Fig. 23Comment About The Way CLSU Intramural 2012
Was Conducted
30%
10%
7.5%
5% 5%
2.5%
2.5%2.5%2.5%2.5%2.5%
5% 5%
2.5%
2.5%
5%
5%
2.5%

31. Conclusion

The sports fee collected by the university amounted to Php100.00 for
the athletic fee and Php115.00 for the SCUAA but the materials needed by
the players or in the ISPEAR are not enough to support the needs of the
player whenever there is a game where an activity, therefore researchers
conclude that the total of Php215.00 was not properly used and it does not
support the needs for the materials in the ISPEAR.

The different colleges in CLSU contains a limited number of athlete
because there was a time that the college experienced lack of
player, therefore researchers conclude that the students in the university
prefer to stay in the house or just watch the game instead of participating or
playing to represent the college.

In CLSU there were huge number of students enrolled but not all of the
students participate to the activity organized by the university, and the
students only participate just to have attendance, therefore researchers
conclude that if the university have a rule of promoting an incentive to be
receive by the student who will participate to the activity there is possibility
that the number of participants will increase so by that it will simply develop
the skills and the talent of the students in sports activity.


32. Conclusion


The intramurals in CLSU encountered some problems
wherein some of it was unavoidable like a bad weather but the
worst problem was lack of materials therefore researchers
conclude that if the money collected to all of the students, the
need for sports materials will be solve.
The activity in a university can be a student-led or
university-led, the last 2012 intramurals in CLSU was a
student-led activity this strategy of a university gave a chance
to some of the students to show the talent in conducting such
activity but there was also a time that the activity was not well
organized, therefore researchers conclude that it is better if
the students will be trained well so by that the students can
definitely organized it perfectly.

33. THANK YOU! 