SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
Monitoring, Supervision,
Reporting and Evaluation
5 days ToT CMAM; Nutrition Cell, Health Department, Govt. of Sindh
OBJECTIVES OF THE SESSION:
Definition and Purpose of Monitoring, Supervision
& Evaluation
Nutrition Data Flow and NIS in Pakistan
Data Collection & NIS
Program Indicators or SPHERE Minimum
Standards of CMAM
SQUEAC Survey and its purpose
Reports using for improvement
Definitions and purpose of Monitoring,
Evaluation & Supervision
•Monitoring= Observation & Quality check
•Evaluation= Performance v/s Set of goals=impact
•Supervision= (Super+Vise) Supportive nurture
to ensure Accuracy & Accept-ability.
•PURPOSE: Prog. Effectiveness? Quality assurance?
through (3As and E) -International agreed Indicators
•=Accept-ability Compare With
•=Accuracy Minimum SPHERE Standards.
•=Appropriateness -Indicator Data collected from=
•=Efficiency Reporting System (NIS)
NIS Nutrition Data Flow in Pakistan
District Data
Compilation
Community
TSFP
OTP NSC
National Data
Compilation
Provincial
Data
Compilation
NIS Data Collection System
• Numbering system
• Data collection
- Individual Data, Caseload data
- New Admission OTP,TSFP,NSC as per Protocol
- Moved In from other HF
- Discharges (Cured, Defaulter/Death, NC, SC, Med.
Transf, TSFP, OTP, etc)
- Moved out to other HF SAM Discharges
• Program Indicators (Admissions & Min.
International SPHERE Standards)
• Weight gain/coverage
Program Indicators (Admissions & Min.
International SPHERE Standards)
•SPHERE: Standard Protection Humanitarian Education
Response made by international NGO coalition (HAP etc).
•Cured Rate= >75% in all CMAM Components
•Death Rate= <3% in OTP, TSFP & <10% in SAM+SC
•Default Rate= <15% in all CMAM Components
•FORMULA:
Cured Rate= No. of Cures*100/Total Discharged
While as total d/c= Cured+Death+Def+NC+Med.T+TFP
Death Rate= No. of Death*100/Total Discharged
Default Rate= No. of Default*100/Total Discharged
Coverage SPHERE Standards: Rural: >50% Urban: >70%
While as for any Emergency/Disaster Camp: >90
Weight Gain:
Normally: Over 200g/week but if it’s >800g= Improper!
Reports as Lesson-to improve Program
COVERAGE solves: Low coverage, High default or
non-response rate and High Mortality (death rate
which may also be due to poor SC treatment) or late
referral to SC (means not before medical
complication).
Coverage SQUEAC
Quantitative/Qualitative Social mapping & outreach
improves All Issues of coverage and other poor
performance facts.
Length of Stay:
High LoS indicates failure of program. As per NIS the
Maximum LoS is 120 Days.
Supervision
Monitoring
improves:
Pre-Default. Tracing
improves:
Mid term
Evaluation
For
Supervisors
Tools:
-Checklist
-Reports
-Output
Tracker
LET’S FIGHT THE MALNUTRITIONLET’S FIGHT THE MALNUTRITION
Thank you!
Thank you!

More Related Content

What's hot

Monitoring and evaluation (2)
Monitoring and evaluation (2)Monitoring and evaluation (2)
Monitoring and evaluation (2)
Dr.RAJEEV KASHYAP
 
Difference between monitoring and evaluation
Difference between monitoring and evaluationDifference between monitoring and evaluation
Difference between monitoring and evaluation
Doreen Ty
 
Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awanDifference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
Malik Sajjad Ahmad Awan
 
Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
Monitoring and Evaluation FrameworkMonitoring and Evaluation Framework
Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
Michelle Joja
 

What's hot (20)

monitoring and evaluation
monitoring and evaluationmonitoring and evaluation
monitoring and evaluation
 
Monitoring and evaluation (2)
Monitoring and evaluation (2)Monitoring and evaluation (2)
Monitoring and evaluation (2)
 
Difference between monitoring and evaluation
Difference between monitoring and evaluationDifference between monitoring and evaluation
Difference between monitoring and evaluation
 
Monitoring & Evalution ...... Orientation PPT
Monitoring & Evalution ...... Orientation PPT Monitoring & Evalution ...... Orientation PPT
Monitoring & Evalution ...... Orientation PPT
 
HOW TO CARRY OUT MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROJECTS
 HOW TO CARRY OUT MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROJECTS HOW TO CARRY OUT MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROJECTS
HOW TO CARRY OUT MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROJECTS
 
Importance of M&E
Importance of M&EImportance of M&E
Importance of M&E
 
Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awanDifference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
 
Monitoring and Evaluation at the Community Level : A Strategic Review of ME...
Monitoring and Evaluation at the Community Level: A Strategic Review of ME...Monitoring and Evaluation at the Community Level: A Strategic Review of ME...
Monitoring and Evaluation at the Community Level : A Strategic Review of ME...
 
Monitoring and Evaluating
Monitoring and EvaluatingMonitoring and Evaluating
Monitoring and Evaluating
 
National health program evaluation
National health program evaluationNational health program evaluation
National health program evaluation
 
Planning cycle for Disaster-Managment.
Planning cycle for Disaster-Managment.Planning cycle for Disaster-Managment.
Planning cycle for Disaster-Managment.
 
Monitoring and evaluation Learning and Development
Monitoring and evaluation Learning and DevelopmentMonitoring and evaluation Learning and Development
Monitoring and evaluation Learning and Development
 
Health Information System Measurement: Assessing, Monitoring, and Evaluating
Health Information System Measurement: Assessing, Monitoring, and EvaluatingHealth Information System Measurement: Assessing, Monitoring, and Evaluating
Health Information System Measurement: Assessing, Monitoring, and Evaluating
 
Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
Participatory Monitoring and EvaluationParticipatory Monitoring and Evaluation
Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
 
Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2
Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2
Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2
 
Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
Monitoring and Evaluation FrameworkMonitoring and Evaluation Framework
Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
 
Health system-evaluation-and-monitoring
Health system-evaluation-and-monitoringHealth system-evaluation-and-monitoring
Health system-evaluation-and-monitoring
 
An Introduction to Monitoring & Evaluation
An Introduction to Monitoring & EvaluationAn Introduction to Monitoring & Evaluation
An Introduction to Monitoring & Evaluation
 
Monitoring and Evaluation of Plan
Monitoring and Evaluation of PlanMonitoring and Evaluation of Plan
Monitoring and Evaluation of Plan
 
Build Your NGO: Monitoring & Evaluation
Build Your NGO: Monitoring & Evaluation Build Your NGO: Monitoring & Evaluation
Build Your NGO: Monitoring & Evaluation
 

Similar to Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting

Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice Management
Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice ManagementUsing the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice Management
Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice Management
Warren E. Corprew, Jr. MBA CMA CHFP
 
freipresleyecqmsnurse16
freipresleyecqmsnurse16freipresleyecqmsnurse16
freipresleyecqmsnurse16
Bill Presley
 
BACC_ExecSummary_CHF_AMI-final
BACC_ExecSummary_CHF_AMI-finalBACC_ExecSummary_CHF_AMI-final
BACC_ExecSummary_CHF_AMI-final
Amy Tucker
 

Similar to Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting (20)

Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition in India: New evidenc...
Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition in India: New evidenc...Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition in India: New evidenc...
Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition in India: New evidenc...
 
Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice Management
Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice ManagementUsing the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice Management
Using the Right Metrics to Improve Physician Practice Management
 
Oct 23 CAPHC CPDSN Symposium - Dr. Peter Fitzgerald
Oct 23  CAPHC CPDSN Symposium - Dr. Peter FitzgeraldOct 23  CAPHC CPDSN Symposium - Dr. Peter Fitzgerald
Oct 23 CAPHC CPDSN Symposium - Dr. Peter Fitzgerald
 
Oct 23 CAPHC CPDSN Symposium - Dr. Peter Fitzgerald
Oct 23   CAPHC CPDSN Symposium - Dr. Peter FitzgeraldOct 23   CAPHC CPDSN Symposium - Dr. Peter Fitzgerald
Oct 23 CAPHC CPDSN Symposium - Dr. Peter Fitzgerald
 
Macra 2017
Macra 2017Macra 2017
Macra 2017
 
Dairy Reproduction: Identifying Problems and Solutions for Your Herd
Dairy Reproduction: Identifying Problems and Solutions for Your HerdDairy Reproduction: Identifying Problems and Solutions for Your Herd
Dairy Reproduction: Identifying Problems and Solutions for Your Herd
 
Maternity and Children's Data Sets
Maternity and Children's Data SetsMaternity and Children's Data Sets
Maternity and Children's Data Sets
 
freipresleyecqmsnurse16
freipresleyecqmsnurse16freipresleyecqmsnurse16
freipresleyecqmsnurse16
 
2013 Performance Recognition Program
2013 Performance Recognition Program2013 Performance Recognition Program
2013 Performance Recognition Program
 
How Allina Health Uses Analytics to Transform Care - HAS Session 16
How Allina Health Uses Analytics to Transform Care - HAS Session 16How Allina Health Uses Analytics to Transform Care - HAS Session 16
How Allina Health Uses Analytics to Transform Care - HAS Session 16
 
Qipp increasing productivity using existing resources
Qipp increasing productivity using existing resourcesQipp increasing productivity using existing resources
Qipp increasing productivity using existing resources
 
MACRA MIPS overview
MACRA MIPS overviewMACRA MIPS overview
MACRA MIPS overview
 
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Strengtheni...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Strengtheni...Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Strengtheni...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day One - Strengtheni...
 
BACC_ExecSummary_CHF_AMI-final
BACC_ExecSummary_CHF_AMI-finalBACC_ExecSummary_CHF_AMI-final
BACC_ExecSummary_CHF_AMI-final
 
In a galaxy not so far far away...ecqms
In a galaxy not so far far away...ecqmsIn a galaxy not so far far away...ecqms
In a galaxy not so far far away...ecqms
 
Quality Orientation.pptx
Quality Orientation.pptxQuality Orientation.pptx
Quality Orientation.pptx
 
MPHA Presentation
MPHA PresentationMPHA Presentation
MPHA Presentation
 
Impact of caregiver incentives on child health: Evidence from an experiment w...
Impact of caregiver incentives on child health: Evidence from an experiment w...Impact of caregiver incentives on child health: Evidence from an experiment w...
Impact of caregiver incentives on child health: Evidence from an experiment w...
 
Beyond the Audit: Measuring MedRec Processes for Quality Improvement
Beyond the Audit: Measuring MedRec Processes for Quality ImprovementBeyond the Audit: Measuring MedRec Processes for Quality Improvement
Beyond the Audit: Measuring MedRec Processes for Quality Improvement
 
KPIs in Microbiology
KPIs in Microbiology KPIs in Microbiology
KPIs in Microbiology
 

Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting

  • 1. Monitoring, Supervision, Reporting and Evaluation 5 days ToT CMAM; Nutrition Cell, Health Department, Govt. of Sindh
  • 2. OBJECTIVES OF THE SESSION: Definition and Purpose of Monitoring, Supervision & Evaluation Nutrition Data Flow and NIS in Pakistan Data Collection & NIS Program Indicators or SPHERE Minimum Standards of CMAM SQUEAC Survey and its purpose Reports using for improvement
  • 3. Definitions and purpose of Monitoring, Evaluation & Supervision •Monitoring= Observation & Quality check •Evaluation= Performance v/s Set of goals=impact •Supervision= (Super+Vise) Supportive nurture to ensure Accuracy & Accept-ability. •PURPOSE: Prog. Effectiveness? Quality assurance? through (3As and E) -International agreed Indicators •=Accept-ability Compare With •=Accuracy Minimum SPHERE Standards. •=Appropriateness -Indicator Data collected from= •=Efficiency Reporting System (NIS)
  • 4. NIS Nutrition Data Flow in Pakistan District Data Compilation Community TSFP OTP NSC National Data Compilation Provincial Data Compilation
  • 5. NIS Data Collection System • Numbering system • Data collection - Individual Data, Caseload data - New Admission OTP,TSFP,NSC as per Protocol - Moved In from other HF - Discharges (Cured, Defaulter/Death, NC, SC, Med. Transf, TSFP, OTP, etc) - Moved out to other HF SAM Discharges • Program Indicators (Admissions & Min. International SPHERE Standards) • Weight gain/coverage
  • 6. Program Indicators (Admissions & Min. International SPHERE Standards) •SPHERE: Standard Protection Humanitarian Education Response made by international NGO coalition (HAP etc). •Cured Rate= >75% in all CMAM Components •Death Rate= <3% in OTP, TSFP & <10% in SAM+SC •Default Rate= <15% in all CMAM Components •FORMULA: Cured Rate= No. of Cures*100/Total Discharged While as total d/c= Cured+Death+Def+NC+Med.T+TFP Death Rate= No. of Death*100/Total Discharged Default Rate= No. of Default*100/Total Discharged Coverage SPHERE Standards: Rural: >50% Urban: >70% While as for any Emergency/Disaster Camp: >90
  • 7. Weight Gain: Normally: Over 200g/week but if it’s >800g= Improper! Reports as Lesson-to improve Program COVERAGE solves: Low coverage, High default or non-response rate and High Mortality (death rate which may also be due to poor SC treatment) or late referral to SC (means not before medical complication). Coverage SQUEAC Quantitative/Qualitative Social mapping & outreach improves All Issues of coverage and other poor performance facts. Length of Stay: High LoS indicates failure of program. As per NIS the Maximum LoS is 120 Days. Supervision Monitoring improves: Pre-Default. Tracing improves: Mid term Evaluation For Supervisors Tools: -Checklist -Reports -Output Tracker
  • 8. LET’S FIGHT THE MALNUTRITIONLET’S FIGHT THE MALNUTRITION