SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Download to read offline
FoRS Code of Conduct on
     Effectiveness
FoRS Czech Forum for Development Co-
                  operation
•   focuses on capacity building of its members to enhance their quality and
    development effectiveness in the area of development cooperation, development
    education and humanitarian assistance.

•   FoRS members have endorsed the framework development effectiveness principles
    stated in Prague Proclamation in June 2009 and Istanbul principles agreed in the
    global process of the Open forum for Civil Society Organisations Development
    Effectiveness.

•   Based on an open discussion, the FoRS Members accepted the FoRS Code of
    Conduct on Effectiveness, including regular evaluations of agreed principles and
    indicators.

•   It has been agreed that the focus will be given to the effectiveness principles in the
    following five areas.


                                                                                             2
FoRS Code of Conduct on Effectiveness
The principles:
1. Grassroots knowledge
2. Transparency and Accountability
3. Partnership
4. Respect to human rights and gender equity
5. Accountability for impacts and their sustainability




                                                         3
1.Grassroots knowledge
The projects of FoRS Member organizations apply field knowledge of the specific
situation, issues and priorities of target groups. FoRS Members use this knowledge
to influence development programs priorities and preparation of own strategies
including fundraising as long-term priorities cannot be changed ad hoc based on
latest calls for proposals or tenders announced by donors.
Indicators:
A. FoRS Members´ strategic priorities are published on their websites and in official documents including
   their basic justification.
B. The territorial and sector specialisation of FoRS Members is stated in their official documents.
C. FoRS Members participate in FoRS working groups´ activities in the field of their specialisation.
D. Principles of democratic ownership are applied in preparation and project implementation. Local actors
   are involved already in identification and formulation of projects.
E. During project implementation and evaluation, necessary information is varified directly at the location,
   where the project is implemented.




                                                                                                               4
2. Transparency and Accountability

FoRS Members are fully accountable for their project outcomes and working
procedures and are prepared to publish them. FoRS Members have a transparent
management structure and transparent way of financing their activities. They
collaborate with project partners to prepare information about implemented projects
and this information is available and accessible to public to the extent as required.
Indicators:
A.The information about organization´s activities and the sources of financing are stated on its website and in
annual reports that are freely accessible to public.
B.FoRS Members are prepared to put forth the outcomes of realized audits and internal or external evaluations.
C.FoRS Members have a transparent management structure and the contacts of executive staff are freely
accessible to public.
D.FoRS Members present trustful and distortion less information about their activities, partners and target
groups (key indicator).
E.FoRS Members refuse to use and tolerate corrupt practises to obtain financial resources for their activities and
projects (key indicator).



                                                                                                                     5
3. Partnership
FoRS Members share with their partners all facts regarding joint goals and
activities. Partnership is based on shared values and interests, mutual trust and
shared accountability towards donors, private sponsors and target groups.
FoRS Members respect the diversity of partners´ opinions, attitudes and
experiences and they make decisions on joint project based on consensus.
Indicators:
A. Partner organizations have access to relevant project documentation and further to final reports of
   realized projects.
B. FoRS Members enhance the mutual exchange of information and cooperation with other
   organizations active in the fields related to joint activities.
C. Main principles of project and program cooperation are mutually agreed in partners agreements.
D. Sharing of experiences and mutual capacity building is a part of partner projects and activities.
E. Partner organizations prove in their activities that they don´t misuse collective information and
   know-how to pursue their own benefit at the expense of their partners (key indicator).




                                                                                                         6
4. Respect to human rights and gender
equality
Respect to human dignity, human rights and the use non-victimizing procedures
are shared values of FoRS Members. FoRS Members strive to better the situation
of socially excluded and other vulnerable groups and to strengthen their role in
society. Special focus is on girls and women empowerment.
Indicators:
A. Selection of target groups of FoRS Members derives from priorities set in a participative and
   transparent manner.
B. FoRS Members support an equal access of all representatives of target groups to the benefits of
   development projects and programs, whereby gender equality is reaffirmed.
C. FoRS Members reject displaying stereotypes of target groups shown as mere passive beneficiaries of
   humanitarian and development interventions.
D. The practices and documents of FoRS Members respect the principles of human dignity and human
   rights of target groups and other actors of humanitarian aid and development cooperation (key
   indicator).
E. FoRS Members reject displaying and describing extreme suffering for the purpose of obtaining
   financial recourses for their activities (key indicator).


                                                                                                        7
5. Accountability for impacts and their
sustainability
FoRS Members are accountable for positive and negative, planned or not
planned impacts of their development interventions and other activities
influencing the situation of target groups and other development actors. They
assume their part of accountability for sustainability of positive impacts and they
are interested in the changes of lives or attitudes of target groups even after they
had finished their projects. They enhance sustainable development of local
communities by helping to reduce damages to the environment and promoting
preserving of biodiversity.
Indicators:
A. The indicators of impacts on(changes in life of) target groups are included in project documents of
   FoRS Members.
B. A participative evaluation of delivered, expected or other possible impacts is a part of internal or
   external evaluations.
C. Presentation of the target groups´ opinions on project implementation and outcomes is a part of final
   reports.
D. FoRS Member organizations give priority to environmentally friendly solutions.
E. FoRS Members are accountable for the impacts of their activities, use the evaluation results and
   solve actively the incidental negative impacts (key indicator).
                                                                                                           8
Enforcement and Evaluation of Effectiveness
Principles of FoRS Member Organizations
 • FoRS Members commit to enforcing endorsed principles of development
   effectiveness in their activities and to evaluating the compliance with these
   principles on bases of above stated indicators.

 • The outcomes of these evaluations will be accessible at FoRS General
   Assemblies and at FoRS website

 • FoRS Members can use peer reviews to receive quality feedback and to
   foster further development.

 • A serious infringement of key indicators can lead to the exclusion of the
   concerned organization from the FoRS platform. In the first phase, an
   appointed member of FoRS Board moderates the discussion on such a
   potential infringement. In the case that the situation is not resolved
   adequately, the FoRS General Assembly decides about the Member
   exclusion.
                                                                                   9
Enforcement and Evaluation of Effectiveness
Principles of FoRS Member Organizations
• The proposed indicators are formed to fulfil the minimal standards that are
  acceptable to all organizations.

• All indicators can be evaluated using following categories: ,,no – with
  constraints – mostly yes – yes”.

• The answer: ,,is not relevant” is not acceptable for any indicator. Even
  organizations implementing their projects without partners have to realize
  that they are accountable to partners and have specific obligations towards
  other FoRS Members, Secretariat and the FoRS Board.

• An independent control (e.g. if all projects are published on websites) and
  feedback (e.g. recommendation to improve Member presentation in case of
  unclear or insufficient information) will be enabled.



                                                                                10
c) Links



Thank you for your attention!

                 www.fors.cz


                 Daniel Svoboda
                svoboda@dww.cz


                                  11

More Related Content

Similar to 15 april accountability zuzana [compatibility mode]

Implementing Evaluation Criteria for Sustainability-EVALMENA 2020
Implementing Evaluation Criteria for Sustainability-EVALMENA 2020Implementing Evaluation Criteria for Sustainability-EVALMENA 2020
Implementing Evaluation Criteria for Sustainability-EVALMENA 2020Maram Barqawi
 
Guidelines for conducting development cooperation projects of syl
Guidelines for conducting development cooperation projects of sylGuidelines for conducting development cooperation projects of syl
Guidelines for conducting development cooperation projects of sylSYL
 
Evaluation Development Activities - 12 Lessons from the OECD DAC
Evaluation Development Activities - 12 Lessons from the OECD DACEvaluation Development Activities - 12 Lessons from the OECD DAC
Evaluation Development Activities - 12 Lessons from the OECD DACDr Lendy Spires
 
140922_Narrative report of Partner’s Participatory Capacity Assessment (PPCA)
140922_Narrative report of Partner’s Participatory Capacity Assessment (PPCA)140922_Narrative report of Partner’s Participatory Capacity Assessment (PPCA)
140922_Narrative report of Partner’s Participatory Capacity Assessment (PPCA)phetsoulaphonh choulatida
 
Partnership for good forest governance in Lao PDR by Phetsoulaphonh N. Choula...
Partnership for good forest governance in Lao PDR by Phetsoulaphonh N. Choula...Partnership for good forest governance in Lao PDR by Phetsoulaphonh N. Choula...
Partnership for good forest governance in Lao PDR by Phetsoulaphonh N. Choula...phetsoulaphonh choulatida
 
4. Social and Institutional Analysis.pptx
4. Social and Institutional Analysis.pptx4. Social and Institutional Analysis.pptx
4. Social and Institutional Analysis.pptxReizleAnnBiCaddawan
 
CESC 1-28-19Participatory Development.ppt
CESC 1-28-19Participatory Development.pptCESC 1-28-19Participatory Development.ppt
CESC 1-28-19Participatory Development.pptRazel Canada
 
Multi stakeholder analysis NIPOFERD: success for knowledge transfer
Multi stakeholder analysis NIPOFERD: success for knowledge transferMulti stakeholder analysis NIPOFERD: success for knowledge transfer
Multi stakeholder analysis NIPOFERD: success for knowledge transferFrancois Stepman
 
Project Sustainability workshop session: YouthMetre Project
Project Sustainability workshop session: YouthMetre ProjectProject Sustainability workshop session: YouthMetre Project
Project Sustainability workshop session: YouthMetre ProjectKarl Donert
 
ICCO Alliance Programmatic Approach - Presentation
ICCO Alliance Programmatic Approach - PresentationICCO Alliance Programmatic Approach - Presentation
ICCO Alliance Programmatic Approach - Presentationiccoalliance
 
Playing the Game Toolkit: A guide for sport-for-development practitioners
Playing the Game Toolkit: A guide for sport-for-development practitionersPlaying the Game Toolkit: A guide for sport-for-development practitioners
Playing the Game Toolkit: A guide for sport-for-development practitionersUNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti
 
Programmatic approach - facilitators ws Okt. 2009
Programmatic approach  - facilitators ws Okt.  2009 Programmatic approach  - facilitators ws Okt.  2009
Programmatic approach - facilitators ws Okt. 2009 ICCO Cooperation
 
Partnerships and capacity building
Partnerships and capacity buildingPartnerships and capacity building
Partnerships and capacity buildingmonzer koulkou
 
he Project Plan and Intention of the Implementing Organization in Proposal D...
 he Project Plan and Intention of the Implementing Organization in Proposal D... he Project Plan and Intention of the Implementing Organization in Proposal D...
he Project Plan and Intention of the Implementing Organization in Proposal D...assignmentcafe1
 
Excellence In School Projects Award Model & Criteria
Excellence In School Projects Award Model & Criteria Excellence In School Projects Award Model & Criteria
Excellence In School Projects Award Model & Criteria Malek Ghazo
 
Global Poverty Action Fund (GPAF) Funding Seminar
Global Poverty Action Fund (GPAF) Funding SeminarGlobal Poverty Action Fund (GPAF) Funding Seminar
Global Poverty Action Fund (GPAF) Funding SeminarNIDOS
 

Similar to 15 april accountability zuzana [compatibility mode] (20)

Implementing Evaluation Criteria for Sustainability-EVALMENA 2020
Implementing Evaluation Criteria for Sustainability-EVALMENA 2020Implementing Evaluation Criteria for Sustainability-EVALMENA 2020
Implementing Evaluation Criteria for Sustainability-EVALMENA 2020
 
Guidelines for conducting development cooperation projects of syl
Guidelines for conducting development cooperation projects of sylGuidelines for conducting development cooperation projects of syl
Guidelines for conducting development cooperation projects of syl
 
Evaluation Development Activities - 12 Lessons from the OECD DAC
Evaluation Development Activities - 12 Lessons from the OECD DACEvaluation Development Activities - 12 Lessons from the OECD DAC
Evaluation Development Activities - 12 Lessons from the OECD DAC
 
140922_Narrative report of Partner’s Participatory Capacity Assessment (PPCA)
140922_Narrative report of Partner’s Participatory Capacity Assessment (PPCA)140922_Narrative report of Partner’s Participatory Capacity Assessment (PPCA)
140922_Narrative report of Partner’s Participatory Capacity Assessment (PPCA)
 
Partnership for good forest governance in Lao PDR by Phetsoulaphonh N. Choula...
Partnership for good forest governance in Lao PDR by Phetsoulaphonh N. Choula...Partnership for good forest governance in Lao PDR by Phetsoulaphonh N. Choula...
Partnership for good forest governance in Lao PDR by Phetsoulaphonh N. Choula...
 
4. Social and Institutional Analysis.pptx
4. Social and Institutional Analysis.pptx4. Social and Institutional Analysis.pptx
4. Social and Institutional Analysis.pptx
 
Cases in Outcome Harvesting-2014
Cases in Outcome Harvesting-2014Cases in Outcome Harvesting-2014
Cases in Outcome Harvesting-2014
 
CESC 1-28-19Participatory Development.ppt
CESC 1-28-19Participatory Development.pptCESC 1-28-19Participatory Development.ppt
CESC 1-28-19Participatory Development.ppt
 
European Project Design
European Project DesignEuropean Project Design
European Project Design
 
Multi stakeholder analysis NIPOFERD: success for knowledge transfer
Multi stakeholder analysis NIPOFERD: success for knowledge transferMulti stakeholder analysis NIPOFERD: success for knowledge transfer
Multi stakeholder analysis NIPOFERD: success for knowledge transfer
 
Project Sustainability workshop session: YouthMetre Project
Project Sustainability workshop session: YouthMetre ProjectProject Sustainability workshop session: YouthMetre Project
Project Sustainability workshop session: YouthMetre Project
 
ICCO Alliance Programmatic Approach - Presentation
ICCO Alliance Programmatic Approach - PresentationICCO Alliance Programmatic Approach - Presentation
ICCO Alliance Programmatic Approach - Presentation
 
Playing the Game Toolkit: A guide for sport-for-development practitioners
Playing the Game Toolkit: A guide for sport-for-development practitionersPlaying the Game Toolkit: A guide for sport-for-development practitioners
Playing the Game Toolkit: A guide for sport-for-development practitioners
 
PM_ RCB__Feb_2014
PM_ RCB__Feb_2014PM_ RCB__Feb_2014
PM_ RCB__Feb_2014
 
Programmatic approach - facilitators ws Okt. 2009
Programmatic approach  - facilitators ws Okt.  2009 Programmatic approach  - facilitators ws Okt.  2009
Programmatic approach - facilitators ws Okt. 2009
 
Partnerships and capacity building
Partnerships and capacity buildingPartnerships and capacity building
Partnerships and capacity building
 
he Project Plan and Intention of the Implementing Organization in Proposal D...
 he Project Plan and Intention of the Implementing Organization in Proposal D... he Project Plan and Intention of the Implementing Organization in Proposal D...
he Project Plan and Intention of the Implementing Organization in Proposal D...
 
Excellence In School Projects Award Model & Criteria
Excellence In School Projects Award Model & Criteria Excellence In School Projects Award Model & Criteria
Excellence In School Projects Award Model & Criteria
 
ReillyT CV
ReillyT CVReillyT CV
ReillyT CV
 
Global Poverty Action Fund (GPAF) Funding Seminar
Global Poverty Action Fund (GPAF) Funding SeminarGlobal Poverty Action Fund (GPAF) Funding Seminar
Global Poverty Action Fund (GPAF) Funding Seminar
 

More from Olga Kozhaeva

15 april enabling environment ester asin [compatibility mode]
15 april enabling environment ester asin [compatibility mode]15 april enabling environment ester asin [compatibility mode]
15 april enabling environment ester asin [compatibility mode]Olga Kozhaeva
 
15 april advocacy arsen stepanyan
15 april advocacy arsen stepanyan15 april advocacy arsen stepanyan
15 april advocacy arsen stepanyanOlga Kozhaeva
 
15 april accountability gillian wilson [compatibility mode]
15 april accountability gillian wilson [compatibility mode]15 april accountability gillian wilson [compatibility mode]
15 april accountability gillian wilson [compatibility mode]Olga Kozhaeva
 
14 april transparency londa esadze [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency londa esadze [compatibility mode]14 april transparency londa esadze [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency londa esadze [compatibility mode]Olga Kozhaeva
 
14 april transparency carlos cabo [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency carlos cabo [compatibility mode]14 april transparency carlos cabo [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency carlos cabo [compatibility mode]Olga Kozhaeva
 
14 april transparency ani akhalkatsi [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency ani akhalkatsi [compatibility mode]14 april transparency ani akhalkatsi [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency ani akhalkatsi [compatibility mode]Olga Kozhaeva
 
14 april introduction amy bartlett [compatibility mode]
14 april introduction amy bartlett [compatibility mode]14 april introduction amy bartlett [compatibility mode]
14 april introduction amy bartlett [compatibility mode]Olga Kozhaeva
 
14 april diversification izabella toth [compatibility mode]
14 april diversification izabella toth [compatibility mode]14 april diversification izabella toth [compatibility mode]
14 april diversification izabella toth [compatibility mode]Olga Kozhaeva
 
14 april diversification alex borisenko
14 april diversification alex borisenko14 april diversification alex borisenko
14 april diversification alex borisenkoOlga Kozhaeva
 
14 april diversification alex borisenko
14 april diversification alex borisenko14 april diversification alex borisenko
14 april diversification alex borisenkoOlga Kozhaeva
 

More from Olga Kozhaeva (10)

15 april enabling environment ester asin [compatibility mode]
15 april enabling environment ester asin [compatibility mode]15 april enabling environment ester asin [compatibility mode]
15 april enabling environment ester asin [compatibility mode]
 
15 april advocacy arsen stepanyan
15 april advocacy arsen stepanyan15 april advocacy arsen stepanyan
15 april advocacy arsen stepanyan
 
15 april accountability gillian wilson [compatibility mode]
15 april accountability gillian wilson [compatibility mode]15 april accountability gillian wilson [compatibility mode]
15 april accountability gillian wilson [compatibility mode]
 
14 april transparency londa esadze [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency londa esadze [compatibility mode]14 april transparency londa esadze [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency londa esadze [compatibility mode]
 
14 april transparency carlos cabo [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency carlos cabo [compatibility mode]14 april transparency carlos cabo [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency carlos cabo [compatibility mode]
 
14 april transparency ani akhalkatsi [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency ani akhalkatsi [compatibility mode]14 april transparency ani akhalkatsi [compatibility mode]
14 april transparency ani akhalkatsi [compatibility mode]
 
14 april introduction amy bartlett [compatibility mode]
14 april introduction amy bartlett [compatibility mode]14 april introduction amy bartlett [compatibility mode]
14 april introduction amy bartlett [compatibility mode]
 
14 april diversification izabella toth [compatibility mode]
14 april diversification izabella toth [compatibility mode]14 april diversification izabella toth [compatibility mode]
14 april diversification izabella toth [compatibility mode]
 
14 april diversification alex borisenko
14 april diversification alex borisenko14 april diversification alex borisenko
14 april diversification alex borisenko
 
14 april diversification alex borisenko
14 april diversification alex borisenko14 april diversification alex borisenko
14 april diversification alex borisenko
 

15 april accountability zuzana [compatibility mode]

  • 1. FoRS Code of Conduct on Effectiveness
  • 2. FoRS Czech Forum for Development Co- operation • focuses on capacity building of its members to enhance their quality and development effectiveness in the area of development cooperation, development education and humanitarian assistance. • FoRS members have endorsed the framework development effectiveness principles stated in Prague Proclamation in June 2009 and Istanbul principles agreed in the global process of the Open forum for Civil Society Organisations Development Effectiveness. • Based on an open discussion, the FoRS Members accepted the FoRS Code of Conduct on Effectiveness, including regular evaluations of agreed principles and indicators. • It has been agreed that the focus will be given to the effectiveness principles in the following five areas. 2
  • 3. FoRS Code of Conduct on Effectiveness The principles: 1. Grassroots knowledge 2. Transparency and Accountability 3. Partnership 4. Respect to human rights and gender equity 5. Accountability for impacts and their sustainability 3
  • 4. 1.Grassroots knowledge The projects of FoRS Member organizations apply field knowledge of the specific situation, issues and priorities of target groups. FoRS Members use this knowledge to influence development programs priorities and preparation of own strategies including fundraising as long-term priorities cannot be changed ad hoc based on latest calls for proposals or tenders announced by donors. Indicators: A. FoRS Members´ strategic priorities are published on their websites and in official documents including their basic justification. B. The territorial and sector specialisation of FoRS Members is stated in their official documents. C. FoRS Members participate in FoRS working groups´ activities in the field of their specialisation. D. Principles of democratic ownership are applied in preparation and project implementation. Local actors are involved already in identification and formulation of projects. E. During project implementation and evaluation, necessary information is varified directly at the location, where the project is implemented. 4
  • 5. 2. Transparency and Accountability FoRS Members are fully accountable for their project outcomes and working procedures and are prepared to publish them. FoRS Members have a transparent management structure and transparent way of financing their activities. They collaborate with project partners to prepare information about implemented projects and this information is available and accessible to public to the extent as required. Indicators: A.The information about organization´s activities and the sources of financing are stated on its website and in annual reports that are freely accessible to public. B.FoRS Members are prepared to put forth the outcomes of realized audits and internal or external evaluations. C.FoRS Members have a transparent management structure and the contacts of executive staff are freely accessible to public. D.FoRS Members present trustful and distortion less information about their activities, partners and target groups (key indicator). E.FoRS Members refuse to use and tolerate corrupt practises to obtain financial resources for their activities and projects (key indicator). 5
  • 6. 3. Partnership FoRS Members share with their partners all facts regarding joint goals and activities. Partnership is based on shared values and interests, mutual trust and shared accountability towards donors, private sponsors and target groups. FoRS Members respect the diversity of partners´ opinions, attitudes and experiences and they make decisions on joint project based on consensus. Indicators: A. Partner organizations have access to relevant project documentation and further to final reports of realized projects. B. FoRS Members enhance the mutual exchange of information and cooperation with other organizations active in the fields related to joint activities. C. Main principles of project and program cooperation are mutually agreed in partners agreements. D. Sharing of experiences and mutual capacity building is a part of partner projects and activities. E. Partner organizations prove in their activities that they don´t misuse collective information and know-how to pursue their own benefit at the expense of their partners (key indicator). 6
  • 7. 4. Respect to human rights and gender equality Respect to human dignity, human rights and the use non-victimizing procedures are shared values of FoRS Members. FoRS Members strive to better the situation of socially excluded and other vulnerable groups and to strengthen their role in society. Special focus is on girls and women empowerment. Indicators: A. Selection of target groups of FoRS Members derives from priorities set in a participative and transparent manner. B. FoRS Members support an equal access of all representatives of target groups to the benefits of development projects and programs, whereby gender equality is reaffirmed. C. FoRS Members reject displaying stereotypes of target groups shown as mere passive beneficiaries of humanitarian and development interventions. D. The practices and documents of FoRS Members respect the principles of human dignity and human rights of target groups and other actors of humanitarian aid and development cooperation (key indicator). E. FoRS Members reject displaying and describing extreme suffering for the purpose of obtaining financial recourses for their activities (key indicator). 7
  • 8. 5. Accountability for impacts and their sustainability FoRS Members are accountable for positive and negative, planned or not planned impacts of their development interventions and other activities influencing the situation of target groups and other development actors. They assume their part of accountability for sustainability of positive impacts and they are interested in the changes of lives or attitudes of target groups even after they had finished their projects. They enhance sustainable development of local communities by helping to reduce damages to the environment and promoting preserving of biodiversity. Indicators: A. The indicators of impacts on(changes in life of) target groups are included in project documents of FoRS Members. B. A participative evaluation of delivered, expected or other possible impacts is a part of internal or external evaluations. C. Presentation of the target groups´ opinions on project implementation and outcomes is a part of final reports. D. FoRS Member organizations give priority to environmentally friendly solutions. E. FoRS Members are accountable for the impacts of their activities, use the evaluation results and solve actively the incidental negative impacts (key indicator). 8
  • 9. Enforcement and Evaluation of Effectiveness Principles of FoRS Member Organizations • FoRS Members commit to enforcing endorsed principles of development effectiveness in their activities and to evaluating the compliance with these principles on bases of above stated indicators. • The outcomes of these evaluations will be accessible at FoRS General Assemblies and at FoRS website • FoRS Members can use peer reviews to receive quality feedback and to foster further development. • A serious infringement of key indicators can lead to the exclusion of the concerned organization from the FoRS platform. In the first phase, an appointed member of FoRS Board moderates the discussion on such a potential infringement. In the case that the situation is not resolved adequately, the FoRS General Assembly decides about the Member exclusion. 9
  • 10. Enforcement and Evaluation of Effectiveness Principles of FoRS Member Organizations • The proposed indicators are formed to fulfil the minimal standards that are acceptable to all organizations. • All indicators can be evaluated using following categories: ,,no – with constraints – mostly yes – yes”. • The answer: ,,is not relevant” is not acceptable for any indicator. Even organizations implementing their projects without partners have to realize that they are accountable to partners and have specific obligations towards other FoRS Members, Secretariat and the FoRS Board. • An independent control (e.g. if all projects are published on websites) and feedback (e.g. recommendation to improve Member presentation in case of unclear or insufficient information) will be enabled. 10
  • 11. c) Links Thank you for your attention! www.fors.cz Daniel Svoboda svoboda@dww.cz 11