The document describes work done by the Cambridge 2009 iGEM team to develop genetic parts for creating bacterial biosensors. They created a "Kit of Parts" including Sensitivity Tuners to allow adjustment of a biosensor's sensitivity to input, and Colour Generators to provide a visible, self-contained output for the biosensor. The team characterized 15 Sensitivity Tuners from previous work by fitting Hill functions to experimental data, determining parameters like their half-maximal induction points. This set of genetic parts is intended to facilitate future design and construction of customizable bacterial biosensors.
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Cambridge
1. Cambridge 2009
Triggering Pigment
Produc/on in E. Coli
Mike Davies, Shuna Gould, Siming Ma, Vivian Mullin,
Megan Stanley, Alan Walbridge, Crispian Wilson
Celebra2ng 800 Years of Innova2on at Cambridge University
4. Cambridge 2009
Bacterial Biosensors: Problems
Solu2ons
S R C
T E
E P O
U
N O L
N R
S O
E T
O U
R E
R R R
Inability to tune sensor as
SensiHvity Tuners Lack of self‐contained output
Colour Generators
desired
– – Limited by sensi/vity of
PoPS converters – Reliance on reporters in
– Bacterial pigments
promoter
– Change sensi/vity of Registry
– Visible, user‐friendly output
– Limited to PoPS output
upstream promoter – Require addi/onal
behaviour of promoter technology to read output
8. Cambridge 2009
SensiHvity Tuners: Introduc2on
Rate of Output
• A Sensi/vity Tuner
allows adjustment of
sensi/vity to input
Concentra/on
• A combina/on of
different Tuners in
parallel allow
measurements of a
range of discrete input
concentra/ons
9. Cambridge 2009
Design: an Input to Output Device
PoPS in PoPS out
T
Phage Ac/vator
ac/vator sensi/ve
promoter
Ac/vator
PoPS in Transcrip/onal and Concentra/on PoPS out
Promoter
Transla/onal
Characteris/cs
Characteris/cs
10. Cambridge 2009
Previous Work: Cambridge 2007
I0500 Phage
T
I13507 Ac/vator I13504
pBad/AraC ac/vator
mRFP sensi/ve GFP
promoter
“Amplifiers”
ac/vators
• GFP output controlled by phage P2 ogr PSP3 pag phiR73 delta
promoter PF promoter I746370 I746380 I746390
promoters
PO promoter I746371 I746381 I746391
• RFP output controlled by pBad PP promoter I746372 I746382 I746392
input Psid promoter I746374 I746384 I746394
PLL promoter I746375 I746385 I746395
• Characterized as an “amplifier” by
ra/o of RFP to GFP
11. Cambridge 2009
SensiHvity Tuners: Modelling
Arabinose Phage Ac/vator Ac/vator GFP GFP
Conc. pBAD PoPS in Conc. Phage PoPS out Transcrip/on Conc.
Transcrip/on &
Promoter Promoter
Transla/on & Transla/on
Characteris/cs Characteris/cs
Characteris/cs Characteris/cs
• Model gene characteris/cs at steady
where
state using Law of Mass Ac/on
• pBAD is repressed by repressor X*
which binds to arabinose
• Assume transcrip/on and transla/on
are linear func/ons of PoPS
• Model protein concentra/ons as
dynamic, since these change slowly
• Allow for protein degrada/on
12. Cambridge 2009
Modelling Results: Sigmoidal Behaviour
• The model contains a large number of constants
• A priori modelling requires arbitrary values to be chosen
• Maximum reporter produc/on rate is sigmoidal with inducer
concentra/on
Reporter Degradation rates at multiple input Model for maximum fluorescence rate
concentrations of arabinose
Reporter production rate
Reporter production rate
time Inducer concentration
13. Cambridge 2009
Curve FiTng: Hill Func2on
A model Sensitivity Tuner
Peak rate
1 RPU
Rate of GFP expression
Hill
coefficient Increase in rate (a)
(n)
Basal rate (c)
Half‐maximal induc/on (k)
Concentra/on of Arabinose
14. SensiHvity Tuners: Changing the
Cambridge 2009
sensi2vity of an upstream promoter
• Constructs were tested on high copy against pBAD
characteris/cs
• Output triggered at much lower arabinose
concentra/on when Sensi/vity Tuner included
pBAD -> GFP pBAD -> Construct 91 -> GFP
Maximum normalised GFP
Maximum normalised GFP
production
production
Arabinose concentraion (µm) Arabinose concentraion (µm)
15. Cambridge 2009
SensiHvity Tuners: Characterisa2on
• 15 Cambridge 2007
constructs moved down to
low copy plasmid
• High throughput tes/ng
• 3 repeats of 3 colonies over
8 concentra/ons
• OD and fluorescence P2 ogr PSP3 pag phiR73 delta
measured PF promoter I746370 I746380 I746390
PO promoter I746371 I746381 I746391
• Standard Promoter included PP promoter I746372 I746382 I746392
on plate to allow for RPU Psid promoter I746374 I746384 I746394
PLL promoter I746375 I746385 I746395
measurements
18. Cambridge 2009
SensiHvity Tuners: Parameters
• A range of Sensi/vity Tuners were successfully characterised
on low copy
• Good range in sensi/vity: 10x range in half‐maximal induc/on
• Hill coefficients of 2 – 3 when concentra/on resolu/on is
sufficient
• Wide range of rate increases, from 0.3RPU to 1.2RPU
A model Sensitivity Tuner
Peak rate
1 RPU
Hill
Rate of GFP expression
coefficient Increase in rate (a)
(n)
Basal rate (c)
Half‐maximal induc/on (k)
Concentra/on of Arabinose
19. Cambridge 2009
SensiHvity Tuners: Design
• A standard kit was designed using well characterised
candidates
• Tuners can be used with any promoter
• Any device can be placed downstream of the
construct
P2 ogr PSP3 pag phiR73 delta
PF promoter K274370 K274380
PO promoter K274371 K274381 K274391
T PP promoter K274382 K274392
ac/vator promoter Psid promoter K274374 K274384 K274394
PLL promoter K274375 K274395
20. Cambridge 2009
Colour Generators: Choosing pigments
• Diversity:
– Colour
Violacein
– Bacterial Origin
• Design
– Standard Assembly
Melanin
– PCR
– Synthesis
• PotenHal for ManipulaHon
Carotenoids
– Single gene systems
– Mul/gene systems with
colourful intermediates
– Supplements to media
21. Cambridge 2009
Violacein: Background
L-tryptophan
VioD VioA
• Quorum‐sensing
controlled pigment from
Chromobacterium
violaceum VioB
VioE
Green VioC
Violet
27. Cambridge 2009
Violacein: Colour Logic
A
VioA, VioB, VioD, VioE
Colour Output
VioC
B
A B Output If A = constitutive, B = inducible
0 0 No colour Colour Output
1 0 GREEN Device working:
0 1 No colour
1 1 VIOLET Presence of B:
28. Cambridge 2009
Melanin: Background Tyrosine
• Brown pigment made in many animals
and bacteria via the ac/on of a
tyrosinase (MelA)
• Isolated melA from Rhizobium etli. MelA
• Media supplemented with copper
sulphate and tyrosine
Dopaquinone
polymerisation
Brown MELANIN
29. Cambridge 2009
Melanin: Design
K274001
Native rbs MelA BCG
K274001
• Used na/ve RBS and planned to
remove forbidden restric/on sites
using PCR
• Strong candidate for a biosensor
reporter
− Strong pigment produc/on
− Single gene
37. Cambridge 2009
Proof of Concept: Pigment Induc2on
COLOUR
SENSOR SENSITIVITY TUNER
GENERATOR
Phage
T
Promoter Ac/vator Pigment
ac/vator
sensi/ve to sensi/ve producing
input promoter device
IRCT
K274120
Pbad I0500 CrtE CrtB CrtI
promoter
IOCT
K274220
I0500 CrtE CrtB CrtI CrtY
38. Cambridge 2009
Proof of Concept: Pigment Induc2on
No arabinose
Induced by
1mM arbinose
Control
5 µg carotene
1mM
arabinose
No arabinose
456 No arabinose
Induced by
1mM arbinose
Control
5 µg carotene
β-Carotene:
1.3 µg per
mL induced
culture
41. Cambridge 2009
BioBricks: Systems
RCT
K274110
R0011 CrtE CrtB CrtI
OCT
K274210
I0500 CrtE CrtB CrtI
IRCT
K274120
R0011 CrtE CrtB CrtI CrtY
IOCT
K274220
I0500 CrtE CrtB CrtI CrtY
42. Cambridge 2009
Further Work: for our Project
• Show compa/bility with
promoters in Registry
• Expand kit of parts
– Phage ac/vators and phage
promoters
– Pigment‐producing operons
from other bacterial species
47. Cambridge 2009
Thank You…
Advisors: Friends:
Dr. Jim Ajioka Caitlin Cockerton
Dr. Jim Haseloff Daisy Ginsberg
Dr. Gos Micklem James King
Dr. Tom Ellis Tuur Van Balen
Dr. Duncan Rowe
…and especially
James Brown
Summary of Achievements:
Designed 23 New Biobricks
Characterised 15 Biobricks already in the registry
48. Cambridge 2009
Thank You…
Advisors: Friends:
Dr. Jim Ajioka Caitlin Cockerton
Dr. Jim Haseloff Daisy Ginsberg
Dr. Gos Micklem James King
Dr. Tom Ellis Tuur Van Balen
Dr. Duncan Rowe
…and especially
James Brown
Summary of Achievements:
Designed 23 New Biobricks
Characterised 15 Biobricks already in the registry