Dr. John Patience - Effects Of Reduced Oil Distillers Dried Grains With Solubles And Soybean Oil On Dietary Lysine, Fat, And Fiber Digestibility In Corn Based Diets Fed To Growing Pigs
Effects Of Reduced Oil Distillers Dried Grains With Solubles And Soybean Oil On Dietary Lysine, Fat, And Fiber Digestibility In Corn Based Diets Fed To Growing Pigs - Dr. John Patience, from the 2015 Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, September 19-22, 2015, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
More presentations at http://www.swinecast.com/2015-leman-swine-conference-material
Fred Yoder - No-till and Climate Change: Fact, Fiction, and IgnoranceJohn Blue
More Related Content
Similar to Dr. John Patience - Effects Of Reduced Oil Distillers Dried Grains With Solubles And Soybean Oil On Dietary Lysine, Fat, And Fiber Digestibility In Corn Based Diets Fed To Growing Pigs
Similar to Dr. John Patience - Effects Of Reduced Oil Distillers Dried Grains With Solubles And Soybean Oil On Dietary Lysine, Fat, And Fiber Digestibility In Corn Based Diets Fed To Growing Pigs (20)
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Jadavpur 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
Dr. John Patience - Effects Of Reduced Oil Distillers Dried Grains With Solubles And Soybean Oil On Dietary Lysine, Fat, And Fiber Digestibility In Corn Based Diets Fed To Growing Pigs
1. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
EFFECTS OF REDUCED OIL DISTILLERS DRIED
GRAINS WITH SOLUBLES AND SOYBEAN OIL
ON DIETARY FAT, FIBER, AND AMINO ACID
DIGESTIBILITY IN CORN BASED DIETS FED TO
GROWING PIGS
N. A. Gutierrez, N. V. L. Serão, and J. F. Patience
Iowa State University, Ames, IA
2. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Nutritional impact of dietary fiber in
corn co-products
• Dietary inclusion of corn co-products increases the
concentration of dietary fiber
NRC, 2012
• Fiber in corn and its co-products is rich in polymers of
glucose (cellulose), xylose and arabinose (arabinoxylans)
Insoluble
Low fermentable
Bach Knudsen, 1997; Gutierrez et al., 2014
• Substitution of highly digestible dietary carbohydrates with
fiber suppose a reduction in the dietary energy supply
May have an effect on other dietary nutrients
3. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Effect of “Xylose” concentration on the metabolizable energy
(ME) of “9” different corn co-products
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0 5 10 15
ME,Mcal/lb
NSP Xylose, %
ME (Mcal/lb) = 1.914 - 0.236*(X) + 0.035*(X2) - 0.002*(X3)
P < 0.001
R2 = 0.71
⌃
Gutierrez et al., 2014 (a)
4. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Introduction
• Digestibility of dietary energy decreases with the dietary fiber
content
Noblet and Perez, 1993
• Fermentation of fiber may contribute little to the overall energy
supply of the growing pig,
• Fermentability of fiber from corn and its co-products is limited
Le Goff and Noblet, 2001; van Milgen, 2006, Bach Knudsen, 2011
• Need for external fat to maintain an adequate concentration of
energy in the final diet
Extracted fat – SBO, corn oil etc.
Intact fat – contained in feed ingredients
5. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Introduction
• Fat may impair microbial fermentation in the hindgut
Degen et al., 2009
• Fat may increase the retention time of digesta
Mateos et al., 1982; Cervantes-Pahm and Stein, 2008
– Slow passage rate may improve fermentability of dietary fiber
• Increase of dietary fiber may stimulate bowel movement and
reduce the transit time of digesta
Bastianelli et al., 1996; Schneeman, 1998; Bindelle et al., 2008
6. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Objective
To determine the effects of the dietary increase of fiber
and fat from reduced oil distillers dried grains with
solubles (DDGS-RO) and soybean oil (SBO)
• Apparent digestibility of AA, acid hydrolyzed ether extract (AEE),
and neutral detergent fiber (NDF)
7. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Materials and methods
Experimental design
• 18 ileal cannulated growing pigs (BW = 74.5 ± 4.9 lbs)
• Individually housed in pens
• 6 dietary treatments
• 3-period (14 d) incomplete Latin Square design
9 d adaptation
2 d fecal collection
3 d ileal collection
Feed was supplied as 90% ad-libitum
• 9 replications / treatment
10. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Materials and methods
1. Sample analysis:
Feed, ileal digesta, and fecal samples:
NDF and acid hydrolyzed ether extract (AEE)
Diets and ileal digesta:
Total AA
2. Measured traits:
Apparent ileal (AID) and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD):
• NDF and AEE
AID of Lys, Met, Thr
12. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Effect of low-fat DDGS and soybean oil
(SBO) on the AID of Lys, Met, and Thr
SBO, % 2 6 P-value
DDGS-RO, % 0 20 40 0 20 40 SEM SBO DDGS-RO SBO *
DDGS-RO
AID, %
Lys 88.9a 85.2b 84.6b 90.2a 84.3b 84.7b 0.82 0.629 <0.001 0.127
Met 92.8a 90.0b 89.6b 93.7a 90.1b 90.1b 0.44 0.008 <0.001 0.223
Thr 81.4a 75.4b 74.6b 82.8a 74.7b 75.6b 1.18 0.371 <0.001 0.434
a,b,c,d Means within a row lacking a common superscript letter are different (P < 0.05)
Least squares means of 9 pigs per diet
13. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Effect of dietary increase of corn co-
products on the AID of AA
1. Decrease in AID of AA was attributed to heating and addition of
solubles during manufacture of DDGS
• e.g. AID of Lys is less in DDGS than in corn
(Urriola et al., 2009)
2. Insoluble dietary fiber (corn-fiber) has minor effects on the AID of
dietary AA
(Zhu et al., 2005)
3. Apparent ileal digestibility of Lys, and most AA, is not predictable from
the dietary fiber concentration (NSP-Xylose) in corn co-products
(Gutierrez et al., 2014)
15. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Effect of low-fat DDGS and soybean oil (SBO) on
the AID of dietary NDF
DDGS-RO = low-fat DDGS
SBO = Soybean oil
SBO * DDGS-RO2
P = 0.037
R2 = 0.53
DDGS-RO, %
SBO, %
2
6
AID of NDF, %
0
2040
50
40
30
20
10
16. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Effect of low-fat DDGS and soybean oil (SBO) on
the ATTD of dietary NDF
ATTD of NDF, %
DDGS-RO, %
SBO, %
55
50
45
40
6
2 0
20
40
SBO * DDGS-RO
P = 0.004
R2 = 0.36
DDGS-RO = low-fat DDGS
SBO = Soybean oil
17. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Summary
• Apparent digestibility of NDF was greatest in diets with high
extracted-fat (SBO) and low fiber (DDGS-RO) content
High fat and low fiber intake may increase the retention time of
digesta
Increase of time exposure of NDF to intestinal microbiota
This observation is offset by increase of DDGS-RO
• At low levels of extracted-fat from SBO, the apparent
digestibility of NDF was not affected by fiber increase from
DDGS-RO
19. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Effect of low-fat DDGS and soybean oil (SBO)
on the AID of dietary fat (AEE)
SBO * DDGS-RO
P = 0.003
R2 = 0.68
AID of AEE, %
DDGS-RO, %SBO, %
85
80
75
70
40
20
0
2
6
DDGS-RO = low-fat DDGS
SBO = Soybean oil
20. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Effect of low-fat DDGS and soybean oil (SBO)
on the ATTD of dietary fat (AEE)
DDGS-RO = low-fat DDGS
SBO = Soybean oil
ATTD of AEE, % SBO * DDGS-RO
P = 0.004
R2 = 0.79
SBO, % DDGS-RO, %
80
75
70
65
60
2
6
40
20
0
21. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Effect of nutrient content on measured values of
apparent, standardized and true digestibilities
Stein et al., 1997
22. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
True ileal digestibility (TID) of total fat
(AEE)
SBO, % 2 6 P-value
DDGS-RO, % 0 20 40 0 20 40 SEM SBO DDGS-RO SBO *
DDGS-RO
a,b,c,d Means within a row lacking a common superscript letter are different (P < 0.05)
Least squares means of 9 pigs per diet
TID, % 94.0 92.5 94.1 94.8 93.8 93.2 1.06 0.586 0.467 0.506
AID, % 72.5a 75.9bc 79.1b 83.5a 83.4a 83.9a 1.05 <0.001 0.005 0.011
23. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
True total tract digestibility (TTTD) of
total fat (AEE)
SBO, % 2 6 P-value
DDGS-RO, % 0 20 40 0 20 40 SEM SBO DDGS-RO SBO*
DDGS-RO
a,b,c,d Means within a row lacking a common superscript letter are different (P < 0.05)
Least squares means of 9 pigs per diet
TTTD, % 93.6 91.5 93.2 93.7 92.0 93.9 1.31 0.587 0.108 0.959
ATTD, % 62.6d 67.6c 71.6b 77.5a 77.0a 80.4a 1.30 <0.001 <0.001 0.008
24. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Summary
• Inclusion of co-products from the corn-ethanol distillation industry
may decrease the AID of dietary AA
Decrease in AID of AA may be the product of heat damage
• The AID of AA was not affected by the dietary increase of SBO
• Apparent digestibility of NDF was modulated by the dietary fat
and fiber intake from SBO and DDGS-RO
Increase the retention time of digesta due to high fat and low fiber intake
Increase of time of exposure of NDF to intestinal microbiota
25. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Summary
• Apparent digestibility of AEE was modulated by the dietary
concentration of fat from SBO and DDGS-RO
• Low values of apparent digestibility of AEE in diets with low
dietary fat concentrations are the result of endogenous
losses of AEE
• No differences were observed among treatments for true
digestibility of AEE
26. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Thank You
Appreciation is expressed to the National Pork Board for
financial support, and to DSM and Ajinomoto
Heartland for in-kind support.
Editor's Notes
The substitution of highly digestible dietary carbohydrates with fiber decreases the dietary energy supply from the feed ingredient. Additionally the increase of dietary fiber may also have a negative effect on other nutrients from the feed ingredient.
In previous research from our lab we observed a cubic decline of the ME with the NSP-Xylose concentration in corn co-products
Interestingly, 71% of the variation of ME was explained by the NSP-Xylose concentration
It has been previously reported that the energy of a “complete diet” decreases with the dietary fiber content
The French reported that the net contribution of Fermentation of dietary fiber to the energy supply is negligible in the growing pig
Therefore, external fat is needed.
Addition of fat to high fiber diets may have different effects...
However, a high fiber diet may also offset some of the positive effects of dietary fat on fiber fermentability due to stimulation of bowel movement and decrease in transit time of digesta (Increase of passage rate of digesta)
A corn-casein diet with 2% SBO was formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements of growing pigs (NRC, 2012),
and 5 additional dietary treatments were obtained by adding DDGS-RO and SBO at the expense of corn
So the only source of fiber was corn and DDGS-RO
And the only source of fat was SBO and DDGS-RO
Our objective was to increase the dietary fat concentration with the inclusion of SBO and, to a lesser degree, DDGS-RO.
Our objective was to increase the NDF concentration with the inclusion of DDGS-RO
No interaction or effect of SBO was observed for the AID of AA
The AID of AA decreased with DDGS-RO. Look at P-value for DDGS-RO
Similar effects from the dietary increase of co-products from the corn-ethanol distillation industry have been previously reported (Urriola and Stein, 2010; Gutierrez et al., 2013).
In both cases, the decrease in AID of AA was attributed to “heating and addition of solubles” during the production of DDGS. This is supported by the fact that the AID of AA, such as Lys, is less in DDGS than in corn (Stein et al., 2006; Urriola et al., 2009).
Insoluble fiber has only minor effects on the AID of AA
In previous research trials the increase of dietary fiber may reduce the digestibility of AA (Schulze et al., 1994), BUT the effect of insoluble dietary fiber, such as corn fiber, showed only minor effects on the digestibility of dietary AA (Zhu et al., 2005) and on the basal endogenous losses of AA (Leterme et al., 1996).
This is also supported by previous research results from our Lab, where the AID of Lys, and most AA, was not predictable from the dietary concentration of NSP-Xylose in corn co-products.
The rising AID of TDF tells me that the TDF present in the corn bran with solubles has some soluble component to it
An interaction between the effect of SBO and the quadratic component of DDGS-RO was observed for the AID of NDF
The AID (46.4 to 22.4%) of NDF showed a quadratic response to DDGS-RO addition at 6% SBO, but no effect was observed at 2% SBO
Supports findings that fermentation of fiber at the end of the ileum occurs
The AID of NDF increased (32.5 to 46.4%) with SBO at 0% DDGS-RO, but no effect was observed at 20 or 40% DDGS-RO.
The different response to DDGS-RO addition between diets with 2% and 6% SBO is possibly the consequence of the
elevated dietary fat concentration in the 6%SBO diets – increasing retention time and therefore fermentability at the terminal ileum
At 0% DDGS the effect may be clear, but diminishes as fiber increases and passage rate increases with it
Increase of transit time of digesta and the time for fermentation of NDF in the intestinal tract
an interaction between the effects of SBO and DDGS-RO inclusion on the AID and ATTD of NDF was observed.
The ATTD (52.0 to 40.9%) of NDF decreased with DDGS-RO at 6% SBO, but no effect was observed at 2% SBO
The AID of NDF increased, however, was not affected by the presence of SBO.
In this case the quite large error did not allow us to catch differences in ATTD of NDF with SBO inclusion at 0% DDGS-RO
The different response to DDGS-RO addition between diets with 2% and 6% SBO is possibly the consequence of the
elevated dietary fat concentration in the latter set of diets,
and the ability of dietary fat to increase the transit time of digesta and the time for fermentation of NDF in the intestinal tract
At 0% DDGS the effect may be clear, but diminishes as fiber increases and passage rate increases with it
The results of ileal digestibility of NDF at 2% SBO are similar to the results obtained in the first experiment.
The rising AID of TDF tells me that the TDF present in the corn bran with solubles has some soluble component to it
An interaction between DDGS-RO and SBO on the AID (P = 0.011) of AEE was observed
The AID of AEE increased with SBO across DDGS-RO levels
The AID (72.5, 75.9, and 79.1%) of AEE increased with DDGS-RO at 2% SBO, but no effect was observed at 6% SBO.
The observed response in apparent digestibility of AEE was modulated by the source of dietary fat.
This was evidenced by the the slopes for the effects of SBO on AID and ATTD of AEE were greater than those of DDGS-RO.
Similarly,
An interaction between DDGS-RO and SBO on the ATTD (P = 0.011) of AEE was observed
The ATTD of AEE increased with SBO across DDGS-RO levels.
The ATTD (62.6, 67.6, and 71.6%) of AEE increased with DDGS-RO at 2% SBO, but no effect was observed at 6% SBO.
The observed response in apparent digestibility of AEE was modulated by the source of dietary fat.
This was evidenced by the the slopes for the effects of SBO on AID and ATTD of AEE were greater than those of DDGS-RO.
The concentration of the nutrient in the diet/feed ingredient has an effect on the measured values of apparent digestibility due to the weight of endogenous losses of the nutrient. This is more critical at low concentrations of the nutrient.
Contrast between determined values of AID vs. TID
No differences were observed for TID of AEE
Contrast between determined values of AID vs. TTTD
No differences were observed for TTTD of AEE
An interaction was observed between the effects of addition of DDGS-RO and SBO on the apparent digestibility of NDF and AEE
An interaction was observed between the effects of addition of DDGS-RO and SBO on the apparent digestibility of NDF and AEE
2. In previous research trials, the estimate of ELF at the end of the ileum and over the entire tract was greater for intact fat than for extracted fat.
This is likely the result of the greater concentration of fiber in diets containing intact fat compared with diets containing extracted fat.
How to estimate ELF at the end of the ileum and over the entire tract
TAD = Total apparently digested AEE
3 first treatments are from diets with low fat:
Treatments 2% SBO and 0, 20, and 40% DDGS-RO
3 last treatments are from diets with high fat:
Treatments 6% SBO and 0, 20, and 40% DDGS-RO
Similar slopes between the two groups, therefore we expected the intercept to be similar for both curves. Since no differences were expected, we included all the data points in the same regression, and were able to explain 99% of the variation in a single curve.
Similar to the previous slide
Greater endogenous losses of AEE have reported at the terminal ileum vs. the entire intestinal tract
Our estimates fall within previous reported values for intact and extracted fat