The document provides guidance on evaluating web sources using the SCAB acronym: Substance, Currency, Authority/Accuracy, and Bias. It advises checking that a source has relevant substantive content, is up to date, has a clear author and sponsor, can be verified elsewhere, and is objective without bias from the author or sponsor. Examples of web pages are provided to illustrate how to apply the SCAB criteria when assessing source credibility.

1. Evaluating Web Sources: What to Watch Out ForRemember the SCAB acronym:SubstanceCurrencyAuthority / AccuracyBias

2. SubstanceDoes this page have relevant, substantive content?Where does this content come from? Is there a review process for this content?http://www.cashforannuitypayments.org/selling-structured-settlement/structural-violence/http://www.articlesbase.com/international-studies-articles/structural-violence-2773901.htmlhttp://societieswithoutborders.org/submissions/

3. CurrencyIs this page up to date?http://www.csudh.edu/dearhabermas/cnstrctviol.htmhttp://www.structuralviolence.org/

4. AuthorityWho is the author of this website? Who sponsors this website?Is there an ‘About Us’ page with substantial information?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_violencehttp://thinsan.org/Snea_praxis/index_48.htmhttp://www.structuralviolence.org/

5. AccuracyCan this information be verified elsewhere?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_violence http://scoyne.weebly.com/structural-violence.html

6. BiasIs this information objective? Who sponsors the website?What does the author stand to gain by convincing me of her point of view?http://www.context.org/GROUPS/CI/ci.htm