SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Usability Testing 
Allison Bailey 
LIS 4804 
The purpose of this test is to evaluate the performance of the website with regard to usability, 
efficiency, aesthetics and functionality. Our goal is to evaluate the website by observing test subjects 
while they complete scenarios which will model the anticipated natural use of the collection. 
Methodology 
Participants/user profile: Our users are those people active in the disability rights, woman’s rights and 
LGBT rights movements, as well as researchers, educators, scholars and students. 
Our test participants are fellow library and information science students who are also working on 
creating a digital collection. 
The setting of the usability test: Classroom 305 in Ruffato Hall. Subjects will be provided access to a 
computer or they may use one of their own. 
Testing procedures and instruments: The test will be administrated to five classmates, one at a time. 
Subjects will fill out a consent form and be asked complete the predetermined test scenarios one at a 
time, using think aloud protocol while being observed by all members of the Hershey Collection Team. 
After they have completed the scenarios, subjects will be asked to complete a post-test questionnaire 
asking for their subjective evaluation of the website based on specific criteria, as well as any of their 
own thoughts or suggestions they wish to add. 
Roles of usability facilitator and observers: Prior to the start of the test, a facilitator will provide brief 
instructions to complete the test. The facilitator will provide the subject with a written copy of the 
scenarios one at a time and in the same order. The facilitator and observers will watch the subject 
complete the test scenario without providing any help in completing the objective. The observers will 
take notes regarding the test subject's use of the website as needed. The facilitator will monitor how 
long each task takes the user to complete. After all subjects have completed the test observers and 
moderators will meet to debrief and compare observations. 
Tasks: 
Browse through the collection for an image 
Contact site administrators for more information. 
Search the site for specific information 
Access metadata information 
Browse through the collection for a text document 
Scenarios 
Scenario 1: Contact, picture browse 
The user wishes to use an image from the Laura Hershey Collection in an article he/she is 
writing for publication. The user must find an appropriate image to accompany the article and needs to 
contact someone through the website to inquire about the rights and permissions for republication of 
the image. Estimated time: 4 minutes 
Scenario 2: Text document, browse, social bookmarking 
The user wishes to find a poem by Laura Hershey and post it to their Facebook time line. The 
user does not have a specific poem in mind, but wishes to find one that appeals to him/her.
Estimated time: 5 minutes 
Scenario 3: Text document, search, metadata 
A student is researching the Disability Caucus and its role in the 1988 presidential elections and 
wishes to find something written by Laura Hershey at the time. The student will need to find 
information about the original publication of the document in order to cite the source. Estimated time: 3 
minutes. 
Performance evaluation measures: 
 Whether the user is able to complete the task without using site documentation or help from 
members of the Laura Hershey Team. Can they complete it fully, partially or not at all? 
 Whether the user is able to complete the tasks and scenarios in the amount of time estimated for 
each. A timer will be used to measure completion time. 
 Whether the user is able to complete the tasks with less than 5 mistakes. 
Subjective evaluation measures will include a post-test questionnaire completed by the subject asking 
them to rate the website on a number of criteria. 
Subjective evaluation measures will also include notes and thoughts of the observers and facilitators 
after watching subjects use the website. 
Indicators of problem severity: 
 A task takes over two minutes longer than the estimated time to complete. 
 A user verbally expresses confusion, frustration or asks for help. 
 A user makes over four mistakes while trying to complete the task/scenario. 
Report contents and presentation: 
The report contents will include: 
 Whether any test subjects met the criteria for problem severity. 
 Whether any test subjects completed the task or scenario in the estimated time and without 
making mistakes 
 Answers to the post-test questionnaire 
 Observations made by members of the Laura Hershey group during the test 
 Our recommendations for any changes to be made based on our findings.

More Related Content

Similar to Usability Testing_Plan

Edu624 Final Project: eLearning for Diverse Learners
Edu624 Final Project: eLearning for Diverse LearnersEdu624 Final Project: eLearning for Diverse Learners
Edu624 Final Project: eLearning for Diverse Learners
Tavares Bussey
 
Collaborative Lesson Plan 2011
Collaborative Lesson Plan 2011Collaborative Lesson Plan 2011
Collaborative Lesson Plan 2011
Joe Tedesco
 
Models of evaluation in educational technology
Models of evaluation in educational technologyModels of evaluation in educational technology
Models of evaluation in educational technology
u083486
 
What do students want from library discovery tools?
What do students want from library discovery tools?What do students want from library discovery tools?
What do students want from library discovery tools?
Keren Mills
 
Assure presentation
Assure presentationAssure presentation
Assure presentation
elmccully
 
ASSURE method 1st attempt
ASSURE method 1st attemptASSURE method 1st attempt
ASSURE method 1st attempt
Nathan Hale
 
Prototype Version 1 .docx
Prototype Version 1 .docxPrototype Version 1 .docx
Prototype Version 1 .docx
woodruffeloisa
 

Similar to Usability Testing_Plan (20)

Web quest presentation e_feig_edu643
Web quest presentation e_feig_edu643Web quest presentation e_feig_edu643
Web quest presentation e_feig_edu643
 
Edu624 Final Project: eLearning for Diverse Learners
Edu624 Final Project: eLearning for Diverse LearnersEdu624 Final Project: eLearning for Diverse Learners
Edu624 Final Project: eLearning for Diverse Learners
 
Copyright lesson
Copyright lessonCopyright lesson
Copyright lesson
 
Incos2010 irene
Incos2010 ireneIncos2010 irene
Incos2010 irene
 
Collaborative Lesson Plan 2011
Collaborative Lesson Plan 2011Collaborative Lesson Plan 2011
Collaborative Lesson Plan 2011
 
Website Evaluation Lesson Plan
Website Evaluation Lesson PlanWebsite Evaluation Lesson Plan
Website Evaluation Lesson Plan
 
Models of evaluation in educational technology
Models of evaluation in educational technologyModels of evaluation in educational technology
Models of evaluation in educational technology
 
Fs3 episide 6(report)
Fs3 episide 6(report)Fs3 episide 6(report)
Fs3 episide 6(report)
 
What do students want from library discovery tools?
What do students want from library discovery tools?What do students want from library discovery tools?
What do students want from library discovery tools?
 
How to measure content effectiveness
How to measure content effectivenessHow to measure content effectiveness
How to measure content effectiveness
 
Machine Learning Applications in E-learning - Bias, Risks, and Mitigations
Machine Learning Applications in E-learning - Bias, Risks, and MitigationsMachine Learning Applications in E-learning - Bias, Risks, and Mitigations
Machine Learning Applications in E-learning - Bias, Risks, and Mitigations
 
Usability and its use for Academic Libraries
Usability and its use for Academic LibrariesUsability and its use for Academic Libraries
Usability and its use for Academic Libraries
 
D school assignment 3 Prototype and Test
D school assignment 3 Prototype and TestD school assignment 3 Prototype and Test
D school assignment 3 Prototype and Test
 
Gaining access and conducting research on moocs: challenges and good practice...
Gaining access and conducting research on moocs: challenges and good practice...Gaining access and conducting research on moocs: challenges and good practice...
Gaining access and conducting research on moocs: challenges and good practice...
 
Assure presentation
Assure presentationAssure presentation
Assure presentation
 
ASSURE method 1st attempt
ASSURE method 1st attemptASSURE method 1st attempt
ASSURE method 1st attempt
 
Itana gimenesevalplan
Itana gimenesevalplanItana gimenesevalplan
Itana gimenesevalplan
 
Biography lesson plan*
Biography lesson plan*Biography lesson plan*
Biography lesson plan*
 
Health Online
Health OnlineHealth Online
Health Online
 
Prototype Version 1 .docx
Prototype Version 1 .docxPrototype Version 1 .docx
Prototype Version 1 .docx
 

Usability Testing_Plan

  • 1. Usability Testing Allison Bailey LIS 4804 The purpose of this test is to evaluate the performance of the website with regard to usability, efficiency, aesthetics and functionality. Our goal is to evaluate the website by observing test subjects while they complete scenarios which will model the anticipated natural use of the collection. Methodology Participants/user profile: Our users are those people active in the disability rights, woman’s rights and LGBT rights movements, as well as researchers, educators, scholars and students. Our test participants are fellow library and information science students who are also working on creating a digital collection. The setting of the usability test: Classroom 305 in Ruffato Hall. Subjects will be provided access to a computer or they may use one of their own. Testing procedures and instruments: The test will be administrated to five classmates, one at a time. Subjects will fill out a consent form and be asked complete the predetermined test scenarios one at a time, using think aloud protocol while being observed by all members of the Hershey Collection Team. After they have completed the scenarios, subjects will be asked to complete a post-test questionnaire asking for their subjective evaluation of the website based on specific criteria, as well as any of their own thoughts or suggestions they wish to add. Roles of usability facilitator and observers: Prior to the start of the test, a facilitator will provide brief instructions to complete the test. The facilitator will provide the subject with a written copy of the scenarios one at a time and in the same order. The facilitator and observers will watch the subject complete the test scenario without providing any help in completing the objective. The observers will take notes regarding the test subject's use of the website as needed. The facilitator will monitor how long each task takes the user to complete. After all subjects have completed the test observers and moderators will meet to debrief and compare observations. Tasks: Browse through the collection for an image Contact site administrators for more information. Search the site for specific information Access metadata information Browse through the collection for a text document Scenarios Scenario 1: Contact, picture browse The user wishes to use an image from the Laura Hershey Collection in an article he/she is writing for publication. The user must find an appropriate image to accompany the article and needs to contact someone through the website to inquire about the rights and permissions for republication of the image. Estimated time: 4 minutes Scenario 2: Text document, browse, social bookmarking The user wishes to find a poem by Laura Hershey and post it to their Facebook time line. The user does not have a specific poem in mind, but wishes to find one that appeals to him/her.
  • 2. Estimated time: 5 minutes Scenario 3: Text document, search, metadata A student is researching the Disability Caucus and its role in the 1988 presidential elections and wishes to find something written by Laura Hershey at the time. The student will need to find information about the original publication of the document in order to cite the source. Estimated time: 3 minutes. Performance evaluation measures:  Whether the user is able to complete the task without using site documentation or help from members of the Laura Hershey Team. Can they complete it fully, partially or not at all?  Whether the user is able to complete the tasks and scenarios in the amount of time estimated for each. A timer will be used to measure completion time.  Whether the user is able to complete the tasks with less than 5 mistakes. Subjective evaluation measures will include a post-test questionnaire completed by the subject asking them to rate the website on a number of criteria. Subjective evaluation measures will also include notes and thoughts of the observers and facilitators after watching subjects use the website. Indicators of problem severity:  A task takes over two minutes longer than the estimated time to complete.  A user verbally expresses confusion, frustration or asks for help.  A user makes over four mistakes while trying to complete the task/scenario. Report contents and presentation: The report contents will include:  Whether any test subjects met the criteria for problem severity.  Whether any test subjects completed the task or scenario in the estimated time and without making mistakes  Answers to the post-test questionnaire  Observations made by members of the Laura Hershey group during the test  Our recommendations for any changes to be made based on our findings.