SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 83
Download to read offline
GOVERNMENT’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION
CR 15-70370
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
DAVID R. CALLAWAY (CABN 121782)
Chief, Criminal Division
KATHRYN HAUN (DCBN 484131)
WILLIAM FRENTZEN (LABN 24421)
Assistant United States Attorneys
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
Telephone: (415) 436-7200
FAX: (415) 436-7234
Kathryn.haun@usdoj.gov
William.frentzen@usdoj.gov
RAYMOND N. HULSER (MABN 551350)
Acting Chief, Public Integrity Section
RICHARD B. EVANS (DCBN 441494)
Trial Attorney
1400 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 353-7760
Richard.B.Evans@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for United States of America
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
CARL MARK FORCE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3 CR-15-70370
GOVERNMENT’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL
FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION
Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document26 Filed05/01/15 Page1 of 5
GOVERNMENT’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION
CR 15-70370
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Comes now the United States through its undersigned attorneys and submits the following brief
to clarify the record and in support of its motion for pretrial detention of defendant, Carl M. Force, IV.
At the detention hearing on April 29, 2015, the Court inquired as to the status of defendant’s outstanding
passports and asked that the government confirm said status with the Department of State (DOS). At the
time of the hearing, government counsel had been informed that, in addition to the personal blue
passport that was recovered from defendant’s vehicle at the time of the arrest (which was expired), there
was a second personal blue passport that was valid until 2017, which had yet to be recovered. The
United States has since learned that the second passport did indeed exist; however, according to DOS,
that passport was an official red passport, which was issued to defendant while he was an agent with
DEA. The United States is further informed that this second passport has been turned over to the DEA
for destruction. This information was not known to government counsel at the time of the detention
hearing and therefore, the United States wishes to correct the record on this matter at this time.
Regardless, this fact does not change the government’s position that a preponderance of the
evidence demonstrates that Force is still a risk of flight and thus, should be detained. As indicated
during the detention hearing, defendant amassed certain special skills through his work as an undercover
DEA agent operating on the dark web and has the knowledge and ability to obtain false identification, if
he has not already done so. This would include passports, which were sold on the Silk Road and on a
variety of black market sites. Indeed, that was one of the services that Force was performing in his
undercover capacity – procuring false identification for the target of the Maryland investigation, Dread
Pirate Roberts, a.k.a., Ross Ulbricht. Additionally, as evidenced by the document created by Force
entitled “el plan”, previously submitted to this Court, Force has actively considered and planned for how
to leave the United States undetected and travel to a foreign country where he would be beyond the
reach of U.S. law enforcement.
In addition to his ability, Force also has the means to flee the country. As evidenced by Force’s
own ledger, which was seized during the search of his house, Force had more than $300,000 in bitcoins
at the end of 2014. This is in addition to the funds in the various domestic bank accounts which he owns
and the $150,000 tax refund, which the government learned about for the first time at the detention
hearing on April 29th
. Then there is the issue of the $235,000 that Force wired to Pantera Capital in
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document26 Filed05/01/15 Page2 of 5
GOVERNMENT’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION
CR 15-70370
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Panama on May 8, 2014, further destined for BTC-e, a digital currency exchange that is not registered
with the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) as it must be to
be in compliance with U.S. law. It appears that these funds were subsequently moved to Eastern Europe
where they are now beyond the reach of United States law enforcement.1
The existence of these
overseas funds is troubling to begin with; however, what is even more troubling is the fact that the
defendant failed to disclose the existence of these funds to the Pretrial Services Office (PTS) during his
interview on April 29th
. Force’s lack of candor with the PTS is directly relevant to the issues of trust
that are central to this Court’s consideration of the government’s present motion and were one of the
primary reasons that the Court in Maryland ordered Force’s detention at the hearing on April 2, 2015.
One point bears special need for clarification as a result of defense counsel’s proffer at the
hearing, however, and that is Force’s digital currency balances at overseas exchanges and what he told
the government (and PTS) about them. It should be clear that Force did not simply have one overseas
digital currency account. He had at least two, and those are only the ones known to the government.
Force had and has an account at Bitstamp, based in Slovenia. Force also had, and has, an account at
BTC-e, as described above. The Bitstamp account was the only account Force told the government
about during his proffer, and by that time the Bitstamp account was already known to the government.
Indeed, Bitstamp had apprised law enforcement of Force’s account and of the large scale withdrawals
he was attempting to make from it. Although Force has agreed to a freeze of the Bitstamp balances, the
government has no way to access the large balances that were wired to BTC-e via Panama. Although
defense counsel’s proffer to this Court was that Force was willing to turn over the necessary passwords
to the government to obtain those passwords on an apparent “thumb drive,” undersigned counsel
represents to this Court that it contacted defense counsel months ago seeking any passwords or PGP
encryption keys and was advised that Force had none and did not memorialize any.
1
At the hearing on the 29th
, defense counsel, for the first time, stated that these funds in the
BTC-e account were the property of the United States and that Force had informed the government of
this fact at the time of his proffer on May 30, 2014. This is simply not the case. At the time of his
proffer Force informed that government that certain bitcoins in his Bitstamp account purportedly
belonged to the United States but he made no mention the $235,000 that he had wired to Panama just
two weeks prior to his proffer.
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document26 Filed05/01/15 Page3 of 5
GOVERNMENT’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION
CR 15-70370
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Moreover, through defense counsel proffer to the Court at the detention hearing this week, it was
represented that Force told the government of the BTC-e funds last year during the May 2014 proffer
and now it is defendant’s position that they were government funds all along. All undersigned counsel
were present at that proffer and none recall this statement. Moreover, as government counsel noted at
the hearing, if those funds belong to the government (which the government believes) and were
wrongfully converted by Force, why would Force have moved them outside the country to an offshore
account if his intention was to give them back to the United States?
Given the defendant’s lack of candor with the PTS, his access to large amounts of known and
discovered funds, including those that he moved offshore; the real possibility of additional funds that
have not yet been discovered by the government; his expert knowledge of undetectable or hard-to-detect
methods of communication; his expert knowledge of false identities and procuring the same; his
communications about a “get out of town” plan; the fact that when arrested and knowing of the
government’s case he was caught with a “go bag” of blank money orders totaling $5,000, a loaded
weapon, and an expired passport; and the other factors described in the government’s motion in support
of detention and adduced at the hearing, the United States requests this Court reach the same conclusion
as the Magistrate Judge in the District of Maryland and detain the defendant pending trial.
Finally, given all the representations that were made about the different account balances and
currency at the proffer, the government respectfully requests that the Court take into account the sworn
testimony of Special Agent Tigran Gambaryan made through his affidavit in support of the Criminal
Complaint in this case. Although it is somewhat lengthy, its factual descriptions and attachments
depicting some of the defendant’s transfers of digital currency should leave no doubt that Force was a
master at hiding assets and covering his tracks, including requesting that evidence be deleted.
Respectfully submitted,
MELINDA HAAG
_________/s/______________________ _______/s/____________
RICHARD B. EVANS KATHRYN HAUN
Trial Attorney, Public Integrity Section WILLIAM FRENTZEN
Assistant U.S. Attorneys
Dated: May 1, 2015
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document26 Filed05/01/15 Page4 of 5
GOVERNMENT’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION
CR 15-70370
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that on this 1st
day of May, 2015, an electronic copy of the foregoing was served via the
Court’s ECF system on counsel for defendant and all those who have filed an appearance in this case.
_____//s//__________________
Richard B. Evans
Trial Attorney
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document26 Filed05/01/15 Page5 of 5
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page1 of 78
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page2 of 78
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page3 of 78
DH-CMF-00001
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page4 of 78
DH-CMF-00002
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page5 of 78
DH-CMF-00003
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page6 of 78
DH-CMF-00004
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page7 of 78
DH-CMF-00005
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page8 of 78
DH-CMF-00006
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page9 of 78
DH-CMF-00007
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page10 of 78
DH-CMF-00008
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page11 of 78
DH-CMF-00009
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page12 of 78
DH-CMF-00010
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page13 of 78
DH-CMF-00011
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page14 of 78
DH-CMF-00012
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page15 of 78
DH-CMF-00013
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page16 of 78
DH-CMF-00014
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page17 of 78
DH-CMF-00015
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page18 of 78
DH-CMF-00016
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page19 of 78
DH-CMF-00017
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page20 of 78
DH-CMF-00018
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page21 of 78
DH-CMF-00019
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page22 of 78
DH-CMF-00020
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page23 of 78
DH-CMF-00021
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page24 of 78
DH-CMF-00022
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page25 of 78
DH-CMF-00023
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page26 of 78
DH-CMF-00024
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page27 of 78
DH-CMF-00025
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page28 of 78
DH-CMF-00026
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page29 of 78
DH-CMF-00027
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page30 of 78
DH-CMF-00028
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page31 of 78
DH-CMF-00029
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page32 of 78
DH-CMF-00030
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page33 of 78
DH-CMF-00031
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page34 of 78
DH-CMF-00032
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page35 of 78
DH-CMF-00033
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page36 of 78
DH-CMF-00034
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page37 of 78
DH-CMF-00035
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page38 of 78
DH-CMF-00036
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page39 of 78
DH-CMF-00037
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page40 of 78
DH-CMF-00038
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page41 of 78
DH-CMF-00039
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page42 of 78
DH-CMF-00040
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page43 of 78
DH-CMF-00041
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page44 of 78
DH-CMF-00042
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page45 of 78
DH-CMF-00043
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page46 of 78
DH-CMF-00044
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page47 of 78
DH-CMF-00045
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page48 of 78
DH-CMF-00046
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page49 of 78
DH-CMF-00047
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page50 of 78
DH-CMF-00048
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page51 of 78
DH-CMF-00049
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page52 of 78
DH-CMF-00050
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page53 of 78
DH-CMF-00051
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page54 of 78
DH-CMF-00052
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page55 of 78
DH-CMF-00053
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page56 of 78
DH-CMF-00054
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page57 of 78
DH-CMF-00055
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page58 of 78
DH-CMF-00056
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page59 of 78
DH-CMF-00057
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page60 of 78
DH-CMF-00058
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page61 of 78
DH-CMF-00059
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page62 of 78
DH-CMF-00060
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page63 of 78
DH-CMF-00061
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page64 of 78
DH-CMF-00062
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page65 of 78
DH-CMF-00063
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page66 of 78
DH-CMF-00064
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page67 of 78
DH-CMF-00065
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page68 of 78
DH-CMF-00066
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page69 of 78
DH-CMF-00067
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page70 of 78
DH-CMF-00068
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page71 of 78
DH-CMF-00069
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page72 of 78
DH-CMF-00070
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page73 of 78
DH-CMF-00071
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page74 of 78
DH-CMF-00072
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page75 of 78
DH-CMF-00073
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page76 of 78
DH-CMF-00074
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page77 of 78
DH-CMF-00075
Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page78 of 78

More Related Content

Similar to Usa v. carl force pre trial detention claims

Twitter vs. United States
Twitter vs. United StatesTwitter vs. United States
Twitter vs. United StatesDavid Sweigert
 
Padma bridge case is a hearsay
Padma bridge case is a hearsayPadma bridge case is a hearsay
Padma bridge case is a hearsayM S Siddiqui
 
Padma bridge case is a hearsay
Padma bridge case is a hearsayPadma bridge case is a hearsay
Padma bridge case is a hearsayM S Siddiqui
 
nysd-1_2015-cr-00379-443608-00694_240208_072439.pdf
nysd-1_2015-cr-00379-443608-00694_240208_072439.pdfnysd-1_2015-cr-00379-443608-00694_240208_072439.pdf
nysd-1_2015-cr-00379-443608-00694_240208_072439.pdfivanasofiatorres2
 
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...Roxanne Grinage
 
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...Roxanne Grinage
 
Twitter v. holder suit to disclose ns ls
Twitter v. holder suit to disclose ns lsTwitter v. holder suit to disclose ns ls
Twitter v. holder suit to disclose ns lsPublicLeaks
 
Fa qs on martial law claims in power point
Fa qs on martial law claims in power pointFa qs on martial law claims in power point
Fa qs on martial law claims in power pointPhilippine Human Rights
 
Ex-NSA Contractor Stole at Least 500 Million Pages of Records and Secrets
Ex-NSA Contractor Stole at Least 500 Million Pages of Records and SecretsEx-NSA Contractor Stole at Least 500 Million Pages of Records and Secrets
Ex-NSA Contractor Stole at Least 500 Million Pages of Records and SecretsThe Hacker News
 
The Haiti File by Mary O'Grady
The Haiti File by Mary O'GradyThe Haiti File by Mary O'Grady
The Haiti File by Mary O'GradyStanleylucas
 
The Background Investigator October 2013 Edition
The Background Investigator October 2013 EditionThe Background Investigator October 2013 Edition
The Background Investigator October 2013 EditionSteven Brownstein
 
Edwards v. snowden add hbo and academy awards
Edwards v. snowden add hbo and academy awardsEdwards v. snowden add hbo and academy awards
Edwards v. snowden add hbo and academy awardsPublicLeaks
 
How the Patriot Act Works by Ed Grabianowski Browse th.docx
How the Patriot Act Works by Ed Grabianowski Browse th.docxHow the Patriot Act Works by Ed Grabianowski Browse th.docx
How the Patriot Act Works by Ed Grabianowski Browse th.docxwellesleyterresa
 
Primary global, full tilt poker, bp, bof a in court news
Primary global, full tilt poker, bp, bof a in court newsPrimary global, full tilt poker, bp, bof a in court news
Primary global, full tilt poker, bp, bof a in court newsvincentjohn174
 
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...Elliot Engstrom
 
The rothschilds news followup
The rothschilds  news followupThe rothschilds  news followup
The rothschilds news followupAnonDownload
 

Similar to Usa v. carl force pre trial detention claims (20)

Read the Memo
Read the MemoRead the Memo
Read the Memo
 
Twitter contra USA
Twitter contra USATwitter contra USA
Twitter contra USA
 
Twitter vs. United States
Twitter vs. United StatesTwitter vs. United States
Twitter vs. United States
 
Padma bridge case is a hearsay
Padma bridge case is a hearsayPadma bridge case is a hearsay
Padma bridge case is a hearsay
 
Padma bridge case is a hearsay
Padma bridge case is a hearsayPadma bridge case is a hearsay
Padma bridge case is a hearsay
 
nysd-1_2015-cr-00379-443608-00694_240208_072439.pdf
nysd-1_2015-cr-00379-443608-00694_240208_072439.pdfnysd-1_2015-cr-00379-443608-00694_240208_072439.pdf
nysd-1_2015-cr-00379-443608-00694_240208_072439.pdf
 
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...
 
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...
Dun and Bradstreet D-U-N-S Update Screen Captured Proof Roxanne Grinage Caugh...
 
Twitter v. holder suit to disclose ns ls
Twitter v. holder suit to disclose ns lsTwitter v. holder suit to disclose ns ls
Twitter v. holder suit to disclose ns ls
 
Us action against st lucia may be connected to visa revocation
Us action against st lucia may be connected to visa revocationUs action against st lucia may be connected to visa revocation
Us action against st lucia may be connected to visa revocation
 
Fa qs on martial law claims in power point
Fa qs on martial law claims in power pointFa qs on martial law claims in power point
Fa qs on martial law claims in power point
 
Ex-NSA Contractor Stole at Least 500 Million Pages of Records and Secrets
Ex-NSA Contractor Stole at Least 500 Million Pages of Records and SecretsEx-NSA Contractor Stole at Least 500 Million Pages of Records and Secrets
Ex-NSA Contractor Stole at Least 500 Million Pages of Records and Secrets
 
The Haiti File by Mary O'Grady
The Haiti File by Mary O'GradyThe Haiti File by Mary O'Grady
The Haiti File by Mary O'Grady
 
The Background Investigator October 2013 Edition
The Background Investigator October 2013 EditionThe Background Investigator October 2013 Edition
The Background Investigator October 2013 Edition
 
Edwards v. snowden add hbo and academy awards
Edwards v. snowden add hbo and academy awardsEdwards v. snowden add hbo and academy awards
Edwards v. snowden add hbo and academy awards
 
How the Patriot Act Works by Ed Grabianowski Browse th.docx
How the Patriot Act Works by Ed Grabianowski Browse th.docxHow the Patriot Act Works by Ed Grabianowski Browse th.docx
How the Patriot Act Works by Ed Grabianowski Browse th.docx
 
Primary global, full tilt poker, bp, bof a in court news
Primary global, full tilt poker, bp, bof a in court newsPrimary global, full tilt poker, bp, bof a in court news
Primary global, full tilt poker, bp, bof a in court news
 
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
 
Usa Patriot Act
Usa Patriot ActUsa Patriot Act
Usa Patriot Act
 
The rothschilds news followup
The rothschilds  news followupThe rothschilds  news followup
The rothschilds news followup
 

Usa v. carl force pre trial detention claims