The Top Ten Environmental law cases of 2014/2015

1. “TOP TEN”
ENVIRONMENTAL CASES OF
2014/15
JONATHAN DARBY

2. AARHUS/COSTS
• Austin v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 1012
– Private nuisance actions in principle capable of constituting
procedures which fall within scope of Aarhus Convention, article
9(3).
– If Convention applies and a claimant seeks a PCO, the
requirement in article 9(4) of the Convention that the
proceedings should not be prohibitively expensive is no more
than a factor to be taken into account.

3. AARHUS/COSTS
• Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government v
Venn [2014] EWCA Civ 1539
– Application of PCO regime to statutory applications under
section 288
– CPR 45.41 not compliant with the Aarhus Convention insofar as
it is confined to applications for judicial review, and excludes
(environmental) statutory appeals and applications.

4. EIA/SEA
• R (Buckinghamshire County Council) v Secretary of State for
Transport [2014] 1 WLR 324
– Exemption from scheme of EIA Directive
– Interpretation of “plan or programme” in the context of SEA
• R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd & LB Hillingdon) v Secretary of State
for Transport [2014] EWHC 2759 (Admin) and [2014] EWCA Civ
1578
– Safeguarding directions and HS2

5. NUISANCE/WASTE
• Coventry and others v Lawrence [2014] UKSC 13
– Revolution in the law of private nuisance
• Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water
plc [2014] UKSC 40
– Water Industry Act 1991
– No implied right of discharge from outfalls created after 1991
• Northumbrian Water Ltd v Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd [2014] Env
LR 28
– Review of authorities on relationship between the law of
nuisance and the rule in Rylands v Fletcher

6. CONSERVATION, WILD BIRDS
AND HABITATS
• R (Badger Trust) v Secretary of State for Environment [2014]
EWHC 2909
– Challenge to badger cull
– Survey of the law on substantive legitimate expectation
• RSPB v Secretary of State for Environment [2014] EWHC 1645
– Wild Birds Directive
– Habitats Directive

7. FRACKING
• R (on the application of Frack Free Balcombe Residents
Association) v West Sussex CC [2014] EWHC 4108 (Admin)
– Application for judicial review
– Relevance of statutory authorisations

15. Thirty Nine Essex Street LLP is a governance and holding entity and a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (registered number0C360005) with
its registered office at 39 Essex Street, London WC2R 3AT Thirty Nine Essex Street's members provide legal and advocacy services as independent, self-employed barristers
and no entity connected with Thirty Nine Essex Street provides any legal services. Thirty Nine Essex Street (Services) Limited manages the administrative, operational and
support functions ofChambers and is a company incorporated in England and Wales (company number 7385894) with its registered office at 39 Essex Street, London WC2R 3AT