The document outlines a team assignment focused on the U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona. Each team member has specific portions to write, with person #4 tasked to discuss the case's significance regarding the right to counsel and self-incrimination. A suggested length for person #4's contribution is 400 words or less, and the writing should be in APA format.

1. This is a Team Assignment. I have attached what another
student on the team's paper. She would like set up that way. She
wants to just add to what she started in APA format. The team
part that ONLY needs to be answered and to be added to the
attached paper is in
BOLD "Person #4"
I think 400 words or less should be enough to make that student
happy for Person #4 part. The Topic is the
Research
the U.S. Supreme Court case,
Miranda vs. Arizona,
paying particular attention to the transcript of the oral
arguements.
For this assignment I was thinking of the break down of our
portions. I have as follows:
Person 1:
Briefly describe the facts of the case.
Introduction
Person 2:
When was the case argued?
Which lawyers argued the case for each side?
Conclusion
Person 3:
Summarize the arguments of counsel regarding self-
incrimination.
Person 4:
Why is the case significant with respect to the right to counsel
and self-incrimination?