SlideShare a Scribd company logo
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
BEFORE SHRI HARI OM MARATHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
SHRI N.K.SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA NO. 367/Jodh/2013
(A.Y. 2008-09)
The I.T.O Vs. Shri Shree Bhagwan Suthar
Ward - 1(4) Prop M/s Gobind Handicrafts
Bikaner Village Thukariyasar
Sridungargarh
PAN No. AXEPS 7940 J
(Appellant) (Respondent)
Assessee by : Shri Suresh Ojha
Department by : Shri N.A. Joshi, DR.
Date of Hearing : 28.04.2014
Date of Pronouncement : 13.05.2014
ORDER
PER HARI OM MARATHA, J.M.
This appeal has been filed by the revenue for A.Y
2008-09 against the order of the CIT(A), Bikaner, dated
22.03.2013.
2
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is
the proprietor of M/s Govind Handicrafts and derives his income
from the purchase and sale of handicraft items. For A.Y. 2008-09,
he field his Return of Income [ROI] on 30.09.2008, declaring of total
income of Rs. 1,46,340/-. On total sales of the year at Rs.
41,02,525/- he has disclosed gross profit of Rs. 4,09,977/- which
gives gross profit rate of 9.99%, as against shown at Rs. 8.06% in
earlier year on total sales of Rs. 36,75,015/- and gross profit of Rs.
3,16,268/-. The A.O. has computed total income of the assessee
vide order dated 18.11.2010 at Rs. 11,70,888/- after making the
following additions:
(1) disallowance out of expenses claimed Rs. 1,73,464/-
(2) addition u/s 68 of the Act Rs. 8,16,584/-
(3) on account of house hold expenses Rs. 34,500/-
2.1 Aggrieved against the above addition, the assessee went in
first appeal before the ld. CIT(A), who, in turn, has given part
relief, against which the revenue has raised the following grounds:
3
"On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the
Ld. CITA) has erred in :-
i) deleting addition of Rs 8,16,584/- made a/s 68 of
the I.T. Act,1961.
ii) deleting addition of Rs. I,73,463/- made on account
of disallowance out of expenses.
iii) Deleting addition of RS. 34,500/- made on account
of low withdrawals for household expenses."
2.2 We have heard the rival submissions and have carefully
perused the entire material on record.
2.3 Ground No. (i) of this appeal pertains to deletion of an
addition of Rs. 8,16,584/- added u/s 68 of the Act. The facts
apropos this ground are that during the year the following credits
are reflected in the balance sheet of the assessee:
1. Sita Ram Suthar 63222
2. Bhagirath Suthar 202200
3. Smt. Gita Devi Bhuwal 105333
4. Smt. Ganga Devi Suthar 52283
5. Smt. Vidya Devi Saini 271296
4
6. Nand Kumar Suthar 15000
7. Khinwa Ram Suthar 14500
8. Smt. Amrati Devi Suthar 12500
Total Rs. 8,16,584/-
2.4 When called upon to establish the genuinity of these 8 credits,
the assessee produced duly sworn in affidavits of 6 creditors. For
the remaining, the assessee produced confirmation through
affidavits etc. before the ld. CIT(A). After considering the
objection of the A.O., given in his remand report which was called
in relation to the additional evidence, the ld. CIT(A) has admitted
the same but the department has not challenged this aspect before
us. We have found that the creditors, in question, have admitted
their respective credits and have also explained their source(s).
The A.O. has not further examined them. Therefore, as per the
settled position of law in this regard that unless the A.O.
controverts the averments of these affidavits, the version given
therein cannot be rejected. On that reasoning only the ld. CIT(A)
has deleted the impugned addition. To further bolster the above,
we may incorporate the evidence produced by the assessee in
respect of the creditors as under:
5
s. Name of the
Creditors
Evidence filed Evidence File Rs.
No. before the CIT
(A)
1. Sh. Sitaram Suthar Affidavit (Accepted by AO
letter dated 18.7.2011 and
WS to ITO
Copy of Affidavit 63222/-
by I.S. Shekhawat)
Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO
by I.S. Shekhawat)
Acknowledgeme
nt of ITR
Balance Sheet
Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by
IS Shekhawat)
Confirmation of Accounts
(WS to ITO dated 26. 7. 20
10)
2 Smt. Manju Devi
Suthar
Affidavit (Accepted by AO
letter dated 18.7.2011 and
WS to ITO
Copy of Affidavit 52250/-
by I.S. Shekhawat)
Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO
by I.S. Shekhawat)
Acknowledgeme
nt of ITR
ITR Acknowledgement (WS
to ITO by I S Shekhawat)
Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by
I S Shekhawat and AO
accepted in his order at
page No. 2)
Balance Sheet
Confirmation of Accounts
(WS to ITO dated 26. 7. 20
10)
3 Smt Vidya Devi
Saini
Affidavit (Accepted by AO
letter dated 18.7.2011 and
WS to ITO
Copy of Affidavit 271296/-
by I.S. Shekhawat) i
Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO
by I.S. Shekhawat AO
accepted in
his order at page No. 2)
ITR Acknowledgement (WS
to ITO by I S Shekhawat)
Acknowledgeme
nt of ITR
Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by
IS
Balance Sheet
6
Shekhawat)
Confirmation of Accounts
(WS to ITO dated 26.7.2010)
4 Smt. Geeta Devi
Bhuwal
Affidavit (Accepted by AO
letter dated 18.7.2011 and
WS to ITO
Copy of Affidavit 105333/-
by I.S. Shekhawat)
Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO
by
I.S. Shekhawat and AO
accepted
in his order at page No. 2)
ITR acknowledgement (WS
to
Acknowledgeme
nt
ITO by I S Shekhawat) of ITR ,
Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by
IS
Balance Sheet
Shekhawat)
Confirmation of Accounts
(WS
to ITO dated 26.7 .20 10)
5 Smt. Ganga Devi
Suthar
Affidavit (Accepted by AO
letter
Copy of Affidavit 52283/-
dated 18.7,2011 and WS to
ITO
by I.S. Shekhawat)
Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO
by
I.S. Shekhawat)
ITR acknowledgement (WS
to
Acknowledgeme
nt
ITO by I S Shekhawat) of ITR
Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by
IS
Balance Sheet
Shekhawat)
Confirmation of Accounts
(WS
to ITO dated 26 .7 .20 10)
7
6 Sh. Bhagirath
Suthar
Affidavit (Accepted by AO
letter
Copy of Affidavit 202200/-
dated 18.7.2011 WS to ITO
by
I.S. Shekhawat and AO
accepted
in his order at page No. 2)
Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO
by
I.S. Shekhawat and AO
accepted
in his order at page No. 2)
ITR acknowledgement (WS
to
Acknowledgeme
nt
ITO by I S Shekhawat) of ITR
Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by
IS
Balance Sheet
Shekhawat)
Confirmation of Accounts
(WS
to ITO dated 26.7. 20 10)
7 Smt. Geetadevi Confirmation of Accounts
(WS
Affidavit 14500/-
to ITO dated 26. 7 .20 10)
8 Sh. Nandram
Suthar
Confirmation of Accounts
(WS
Affidavit 15000/-
to ITO dated 26.7 .2010)
9 Sh. Khinwa Ram
Suthar
Confirmation of Accounts
(WS
Affidavit 14500/-
to ITO dated 26.7 .2010)
10 Smt. Imrati Devi
Suthar
Confirmation of Accounts
(WS
Affidavit 12500/-
to ITO dated 26.7 .20 10)
11 Sh. Om Prakash
Suthar
Confirmation of Accounts
(WS
Affidavit 13500/-
to ITO dated 26.7.2010)
8
2.5 The above, is the pictograph of evidence produced in respect
of all the creditors, including the one we are concerned with in this
appeal. Resultantly, we confirm the impugned deletion of Rs.
8,16,584/- made u/s 68 of the Act and cannot allow Ground No. (i)
of revenue’s appeal.
3. The Ground No. (ii) is regarding deletion of addition of Rs.
1,73,463/- made on account of disallowance out of expenses. All
these expenses are in relation to the trading activities of the
assessee. The A.O. has not rejected the books of account. So he
cannot disturb the expenses claimed unless any particular expenses
is found to have been wrongly claimed. In this case, the A.O. has
not doubted the receipts etc and have accepted the same, so the
A.O. cannot reject some of the expenses. In this regard, the
judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT
Vs. Maharaja Shree Ummaid Mills Ltd. [1991] 192 ITR 565 [Raj] is
relevant. Accordingly, we uphold this deletion and dismiss Ground
No. (ii) of revenue’s appeal.
9
4. The Ground No. (iii) is regarding deletion of an addition of Rs.
34,500/- made on account of low household withdrawals. This
addition is based on no material but on wild guess and pure
estimation with reference to the size of the family and the standard
of living. The A.O. has not brought any evidence on record, in this
regard. Therefore, we approve this deletion as well and dismiss
Ground No. (iii) of revenue’s appeal.
5. In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands
allowed.
Order Pronounced in the Court on 13th
May, 2014.
Sd/- Sd/-
(N.K.SAINI) [HARI OM MARATHA]
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated : 13th
May, 2014
VL/-
10
Copy to:
The Appellant
The Respondent
The CIT By Order
The CIT(A)
The DR
Assistant Registrar
ITAT, Jodhpur

More Related Content

What's hot

Newsletter sep 2015 - issue no.1
Newsletter   sep 2015 - issue no.1Newsletter   sep 2015 - issue no.1
Newsletter sep 2015 - issue no.1
oswinfo
 
Lawweb.in whether it is necessary to make enquiry us 202 of crpc in case of d...
Lawweb.in whether it is necessary to make enquiry us 202 of crpc in case of d...Lawweb.in whether it is necessary to make enquiry us 202 of crpc in case of d...
Lawweb.in whether it is necessary to make enquiry us 202 of crpc in case of d...
Law Web
 
ITAT Mumbai (‘H’ Bench) confirms assessment on beneficiaries the balance in t...
ITAT Mumbai (‘H’ Bench) confirms assessment on beneficiaries the balance in t...ITAT Mumbai (‘H’ Bench) confirms assessment on beneficiaries the balance in t...
ITAT Mumbai (‘H’ Bench) confirms assessment on beneficiaries the balance in t...
D Murali ☆
 
Income-tax – Case law updates - V. K. Subramani
Income-tax – Case law updates  - V. K. SubramaniIncome-tax – Case law updates  - V. K. Subramani
Income-tax – Case law updates - V. K. Subramani
D Murali ☆
 
Ac Counting For Business
Ac Counting For BusinessAc Counting For Business
Ac Counting For Business
guest3cebbf
 
AP HC Order.pdf
AP HC Order.pdfAP HC Order.pdf
AP HC Order.pdf
sabrangsabrang
 
Aadhar review judgment
Aadhar review judgmentAadhar review judgment
Aadhar review judgment
sabrangsabrang
 
Rana Ayyub vs UOI filing copy.pdf
Rana Ayyub vs UOI filing copy.pdfRana Ayyub vs UOI filing copy.pdf
Rana Ayyub vs UOI filing copy.pdf
sabrangsabrang
 
Decease claim set
Decease claim setDecease claim set
Decease claim set
Myles
 
Sap erp ru updates digest 4_q_2015
Sap erp ru updates digest 4_q_2015Sap erp ru updates digest 4_q_2015
Sap erp ru updates digest 4_q_2015
Dmitry Usov
 
Pil order
Pil   orderPil   order
Pil order
ZahidManiyar
 
Acquisory news-bytes-7th-8th-may-2017
Acquisory news-bytes-7th-8th-may-2017Acquisory news-bytes-7th-8th-may-2017
Acquisory news-bytes-7th-8th-may-2017
Acquisory Consulting LLP
 
Lunawat Bulletin - December 2017
Lunawat Bulletin - December 2017Lunawat Bulletin - December 2017
Lunawat Bulletin - December 2017
CA. Pramod Jain
 
Advanced financial accounting past paper 2018 b.com part 2 punjab university
Advanced financial accounting past paper 2018 b.com part 2 punjab universityAdvanced financial accounting past paper 2018 b.com part 2 punjab university
Advanced financial accounting past paper 2018 b.com part 2 punjab university
Paksights
 
Lunawat bulletin - october 2017
Lunawat bulletin  - october 2017Lunawat bulletin  - october 2017
Lunawat bulletin - october 2017
CA. Pramod Jain
 
2017 stm2
2017 stm22017 stm2
New form-16a
New form-16aNew form-16a
New form-16a
mandeepkumardagar
 
True Copy of SLP Civil No. 9483 of 2013 before SC
True Copy of SLP Civil No. 9483 of 2013 before SCTrue Copy of SLP Civil No. 9483 of 2013 before SC
True Copy of SLP Civil No. 9483 of 2013 before SC
Om Prakash Poddar
 
Newsletter dated 15th May,2015
Newsletter  dated 15th May,2015Newsletter  dated 15th May,2015
Newsletter dated 15th May,2015
Proglobalcorp India
 
Dmi housing Finance - Ahmedabad Business Standrad
Dmi housing Finance - Ahmedabad Business StandradDmi housing Finance - Ahmedabad Business Standrad
Dmi housing Finance - Ahmedabad Business Standrad
dmihousingfinance
 

What's hot (20)

Newsletter sep 2015 - issue no.1
Newsletter   sep 2015 - issue no.1Newsletter   sep 2015 - issue no.1
Newsletter sep 2015 - issue no.1
 
Lawweb.in whether it is necessary to make enquiry us 202 of crpc in case of d...
Lawweb.in whether it is necessary to make enquiry us 202 of crpc in case of d...Lawweb.in whether it is necessary to make enquiry us 202 of crpc in case of d...
Lawweb.in whether it is necessary to make enquiry us 202 of crpc in case of d...
 
ITAT Mumbai (‘H’ Bench) confirms assessment on beneficiaries the balance in t...
ITAT Mumbai (‘H’ Bench) confirms assessment on beneficiaries the balance in t...ITAT Mumbai (‘H’ Bench) confirms assessment on beneficiaries the balance in t...
ITAT Mumbai (‘H’ Bench) confirms assessment on beneficiaries the balance in t...
 
Income-tax – Case law updates - V. K. Subramani
Income-tax – Case law updates  - V. K. SubramaniIncome-tax – Case law updates  - V. K. Subramani
Income-tax – Case law updates - V. K. Subramani
 
Ac Counting For Business
Ac Counting For BusinessAc Counting For Business
Ac Counting For Business
 
AP HC Order.pdf
AP HC Order.pdfAP HC Order.pdf
AP HC Order.pdf
 
Aadhar review judgment
Aadhar review judgmentAadhar review judgment
Aadhar review judgment
 
Rana Ayyub vs UOI filing copy.pdf
Rana Ayyub vs UOI filing copy.pdfRana Ayyub vs UOI filing copy.pdf
Rana Ayyub vs UOI filing copy.pdf
 
Decease claim set
Decease claim setDecease claim set
Decease claim set
 
Sap erp ru updates digest 4_q_2015
Sap erp ru updates digest 4_q_2015Sap erp ru updates digest 4_q_2015
Sap erp ru updates digest 4_q_2015
 
Pil order
Pil   orderPil   order
Pil order
 
Acquisory news-bytes-7th-8th-may-2017
Acquisory news-bytes-7th-8th-may-2017Acquisory news-bytes-7th-8th-may-2017
Acquisory news-bytes-7th-8th-may-2017
 
Lunawat Bulletin - December 2017
Lunawat Bulletin - December 2017Lunawat Bulletin - December 2017
Lunawat Bulletin - December 2017
 
Advanced financial accounting past paper 2018 b.com part 2 punjab university
Advanced financial accounting past paper 2018 b.com part 2 punjab universityAdvanced financial accounting past paper 2018 b.com part 2 punjab university
Advanced financial accounting past paper 2018 b.com part 2 punjab university
 
Lunawat bulletin - october 2017
Lunawat bulletin  - october 2017Lunawat bulletin  - october 2017
Lunawat bulletin - october 2017
 
2017 stm2
2017 stm22017 stm2
2017 stm2
 
New form-16a
New form-16aNew form-16a
New form-16a
 
True Copy of SLP Civil No. 9483 of 2013 before SC
True Copy of SLP Civil No. 9483 of 2013 before SCTrue Copy of SLP Civil No. 9483 of 2013 before SC
True Copy of SLP Civil No. 9483 of 2013 before SC
 
Newsletter dated 15th May,2015
Newsletter  dated 15th May,2015Newsletter  dated 15th May,2015
Newsletter dated 15th May,2015
 
Dmi housing Finance - Ahmedabad Business Standrad
Dmi housing Finance - Ahmedabad Business StandradDmi housing Finance - Ahmedabad Business Standrad
Dmi housing Finance - Ahmedabad Business Standrad
 

Viewers also liked

Top 8 exec assistant resume samples
Top 8 exec assistant resume samplesTop 8 exec assistant resume samples
Top 8 exec assistant resume samples
austinj3805ameson620
 
Top 8 homecare assistant resume samples
Top 8 homecare assistant resume samplesTop 8 homecare assistant resume samples
Top 8 homecare assistant resume samples
austinj3805ameson620
 
Top 8 administrative executive assistant resume samples
Top 8 administrative executive assistant resume samplesTop 8 administrative executive assistant resume samples
Top 8 administrative executive assistant resume samples
austinj3805ameson620
 
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, SriganganagarGagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagar
suresh ojha
 
Anika Equities Groundlease Overview
Anika Equities Groundlease Overview Anika Equities Groundlease Overview
Anika Equities Groundlease Overview
Daniel Edrei
 
Top 8 post room assistant resume samples
Top 8 post room assistant resume samplesTop 8 post room assistant resume samples
Top 8 post room assistant resume samples
austinj3805ameson620
 
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, SriganganagarGauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
suresh ojha
 
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014
suresh ojha
 
GC_Mlegal_Roundtable
GC_Mlegal_RoundtableGC_Mlegal_Roundtable
GC_Mlegal_Roundtable
Brad Bruner
 
Top 8 assistant account resume samples
Top 8 assistant account resume samplesTop 8 assistant account resume samples
Top 8 assistant account resume samples
austinj3805ameson620
 
Top 8 mortgage assistant resume samples
Top 8 mortgage assistant resume samplesTop 8 mortgage assistant resume samples
Top 8 mortgage assistant resume samples
austinj3805ameson620
 
Top 8 internet cafe assistant resume samples
Top 8 internet cafe assistant resume samplesTop 8 internet cafe assistant resume samples
Top 8 internet cafe assistant resume samples
austinj3805ameson620
 
Top 8 advertising sales assistant resume samples
Top 8 advertising sales assistant resume samplesTop 8 advertising sales assistant resume samples
Top 8 advertising sales assistant resume samples
austinj3805ameson620
 
Top 8 supermarket sales assistant resume samples
Top 8 supermarket sales assistant resume samplesTop 8 supermarket sales assistant resume samples
Top 8 supermarket sales assistant resume samples
austinj3805ameson620
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Top 8 exec assistant resume samples
Top 8 exec assistant resume samplesTop 8 exec assistant resume samples
Top 8 exec assistant resume samples
 
Top 8 homecare assistant resume samples
Top 8 homecare assistant resume samplesTop 8 homecare assistant resume samples
Top 8 homecare assistant resume samples
 
Top 8 administrative executive assistant resume samples
Top 8 administrative executive assistant resume samplesTop 8 administrative executive assistant resume samples
Top 8 administrative executive assistant resume samples
 
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, SriganganagarGagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagar
 
Anika Equities Groundlease Overview
Anika Equities Groundlease Overview Anika Equities Groundlease Overview
Anika Equities Groundlease Overview
 
Top 8 post room assistant resume samples
Top 8 post room assistant resume samplesTop 8 post room assistant resume samples
Top 8 post room assistant resume samples
 
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, SriganganagarGauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
 
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014
 
GC_Mlegal_Roundtable
GC_Mlegal_RoundtableGC_Mlegal_Roundtable
GC_Mlegal_Roundtable
 
Top 8 assistant account resume samples
Top 8 assistant account resume samplesTop 8 assistant account resume samples
Top 8 assistant account resume samples
 
Top 8 mortgage assistant resume samples
Top 8 mortgage assistant resume samplesTop 8 mortgage assistant resume samples
Top 8 mortgage assistant resume samples
 
Top 8 internet cafe assistant resume samples
Top 8 internet cafe assistant resume samplesTop 8 internet cafe assistant resume samples
Top 8 internet cafe assistant resume samples
 
Top 8 advertising sales assistant resume samples
Top 8 advertising sales assistant resume samplesTop 8 advertising sales assistant resume samples
Top 8 advertising sales assistant resume samples
 
Top 8 supermarket sales assistant resume samples
Top 8 supermarket sales assistant resume samplesTop 8 supermarket sales assistant resume samples
Top 8 supermarket sales assistant resume samples
 

Similar to The ITO Ward, Bikaner vs. Shree Bhagwan Suthar

Shri Virendra Singh Shekawat
Shri Virendra Singh ShekawatShri Virendra Singh Shekawat
Shri Virendra Singh Shekawat
suresh ojha
 
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarh
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO SuratgarhPatel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarh
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarh
suresh ojha
 
Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, SriganganagarAnoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
suresh ojha
 
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarh
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, HanumangarhAditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarh
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarh
suresh ojha
 
Rrb income tax letters
Rrb income tax lettersRrb income tax letters
Rrb income tax letters
saritabhardwaj2007
 
ITO-Vs-Suresh-Prasad-ITAT-Patna.pdf
ITO-Vs-Suresh-Prasad-ITAT-Patna.pdfITO-Vs-Suresh-Prasad-ITAT-Patna.pdf
ITO-Vs-Suresh-Prasad-ITAT-Patna.pdf
Surendra Kumar Maguluri
 
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)
suresh ojha
 
Consideration of Penalty Proceedings Order for Quantum Assessment: Analysis o...
Consideration of Penalty Proceedings Order for Quantum Assessment: Analysis o...Consideration of Penalty Proceedings Order for Quantum Assessment: Analysis o...
Consideration of Penalty Proceedings Order for Quantum Assessment: Analysis o...
DVSResearchFoundatio
 
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, SriganganagarGagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
suresh ojha
 
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagar
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 SriganganagarGouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagar
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagar
suresh ojha
 
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)
NextBigWhat
 
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarh
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, SuratgarhRadhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarh
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarh
suresh ojha
 
569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_
 569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_ 569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_
569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_
Mumbai Ngo
 
Cheque Dishonour PPt [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Cheque Dishonour PPt [Autosaved] (1).pptxCheque Dishonour PPt [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Cheque Dishonour PPt [Autosaved] (1).pptx
ramindersingh49665
 
Takeover Panorama: September 2014
Takeover Panorama: September 2014Takeover Panorama: September 2014
Takeover Panorama: September 2014
Corporate Professionals
 
SPN Missive February2014
SPN Missive February2014SPN Missive February2014
SPN Missive February2014
S.P.Nagrath & Co.
 
A statement recorded u/s 133A of the I.T. Act, 1961 by an income-tax authorit...
A statement recorded u/s 133A of the I.T. Act, 1961 by an income-tax authorit...A statement recorded u/s 133A of the I.T. Act, 1961 by an income-tax authorit...
A statement recorded u/s 133A of the I.T. Act, 1961 by an income-tax authorit...
D Murali ☆
 
The ACIT, Circle-2, Bikaner vs. Gopal Ram Pema Ram
The ACIT, Circle-2, Bikaner vs. Gopal Ram Pema RamThe ACIT, Circle-2, Bikaner vs. Gopal Ram Pema Ram
The ACIT, Circle-2, Bikaner vs. Gopal Ram Pema Ram
suresh ojha
 
810 23 july_2014
810 23 july_2014810 23 july_2014
810 23 july_2014
amconnect
 
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makrana
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, MakranaKamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makrana
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makrana
suresh ojha
 

Similar to The ITO Ward, Bikaner vs. Shree Bhagwan Suthar (20)

Shri Virendra Singh Shekawat
Shri Virendra Singh ShekawatShri Virendra Singh Shekawat
Shri Virendra Singh Shekawat
 
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarh
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO SuratgarhPatel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarh
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarh
 
Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, SriganganagarAnoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
 
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarh
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, HanumangarhAditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarh
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarh
 
Rrb income tax letters
Rrb income tax lettersRrb income tax letters
Rrb income tax letters
 
ITO-Vs-Suresh-Prasad-ITAT-Patna.pdf
ITO-Vs-Suresh-Prasad-ITAT-Patna.pdfITO-Vs-Suresh-Prasad-ITAT-Patna.pdf
ITO-Vs-Suresh-Prasad-ITAT-Patna.pdf
 
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)
 
Consideration of Penalty Proceedings Order for Quantum Assessment: Analysis o...
Consideration of Penalty Proceedings Order for Quantum Assessment: Analysis o...Consideration of Penalty Proceedings Order for Quantum Assessment: Analysis o...
Consideration of Penalty Proceedings Order for Quantum Assessment: Analysis o...
 
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, SriganganagarGagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
 
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagar
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 SriganganagarGouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagar
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagar
 
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)
 
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarh
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, SuratgarhRadhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarh
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarh
 
569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_
 569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_ 569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_
569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_
 
Cheque Dishonour PPt [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Cheque Dishonour PPt [Autosaved] (1).pptxCheque Dishonour PPt [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Cheque Dishonour PPt [Autosaved] (1).pptx
 
Takeover Panorama: September 2014
Takeover Panorama: September 2014Takeover Panorama: September 2014
Takeover Panorama: September 2014
 
SPN Missive February2014
SPN Missive February2014SPN Missive February2014
SPN Missive February2014
 
A statement recorded u/s 133A of the I.T. Act, 1961 by an income-tax authorit...
A statement recorded u/s 133A of the I.T. Act, 1961 by an income-tax authorit...A statement recorded u/s 133A of the I.T. Act, 1961 by an income-tax authorit...
A statement recorded u/s 133A of the I.T. Act, 1961 by an income-tax authorit...
 
The ACIT, Circle-2, Bikaner vs. Gopal Ram Pema Ram
The ACIT, Circle-2, Bikaner vs. Gopal Ram Pema RamThe ACIT, Circle-2, Bikaner vs. Gopal Ram Pema Ram
The ACIT, Circle-2, Bikaner vs. Gopal Ram Pema Ram
 
810 23 july_2014
810 23 july_2014810 23 july_2014
810 23 july_2014
 
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makrana
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, MakranaKamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makrana
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makrana
 

More from suresh ojha

Recording_of_statement
Recording_of_statementRecording_of_statement
Recording_of_statement
suresh ojha
 
The ACIT, Sriganganagar vs. Ganesh Builders, Sriganganagar
The ACIT, Sriganganagar vs. Ganesh Builders, SriganganagarThe ACIT, Sriganganagar vs. Ganesh Builders, Sriganganagar
The ACIT, Sriganganagar vs. Ganesh Builders, Sriganganagar
suresh ojha
 
s. Hanumangarh Kray
s. Hanumangarh Krays. Hanumangarh Kray
s. Hanumangarh Kray
suresh ojha
 
Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagar
Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, SriganganagarPushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagar
Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagar
suresh ojha
 
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEE
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEENOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEE
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEE
suresh ojha
 
Nosegay Public School
Nosegay Public SchoolNosegay Public School
Nosegay Public School
suresh ojha
 
Nosegay kindergarden
Nosegay kindergardenNosegay kindergarden
Nosegay kindergarden
suresh ojha
 
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trust
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable TrustMata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trust
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trust
suresh ojha
 
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpur
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, JodhpurKanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpur
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpur
suresh ojha
 
Kangiri Contractors
Kangiri ContractorsKangiri Contractors
Kangiri Contractors
suresh ojha
 
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprises
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan EnterprisesITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprises
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprises
suresh ojha
 
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, Bikaner
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, BikanerGanesh Builders vs CIT, Bikaner
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, Bikaner
suresh ojha
 
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantia
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar TantiaDCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantia
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantia
suresh ojha
 
DCIT Vs Saraf Export
DCIT Vs Saraf ExportDCIT Vs Saraf Export
DCIT Vs Saraf Export
suresh ojha
 

More from suresh ojha (15)

Copy of AIFTP
Copy of AIFTP Copy of AIFTP
Copy of AIFTP
 
Recording_of_statement
Recording_of_statementRecording_of_statement
Recording_of_statement
 
The ACIT, Sriganganagar vs. Ganesh Builders, Sriganganagar
The ACIT, Sriganganagar vs. Ganesh Builders, SriganganagarThe ACIT, Sriganganagar vs. Ganesh Builders, Sriganganagar
The ACIT, Sriganganagar vs. Ganesh Builders, Sriganganagar
 
s. Hanumangarh Kray
s. Hanumangarh Krays. Hanumangarh Kray
s. Hanumangarh Kray
 
Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagar
Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, SriganganagarPushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagar
Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagar
 
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEE
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEENOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEE
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEE
 
Nosegay Public School
Nosegay Public SchoolNosegay Public School
Nosegay Public School
 
Nosegay kindergarden
Nosegay kindergardenNosegay kindergarden
Nosegay kindergarden
 
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trust
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable TrustMata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trust
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trust
 
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpur
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, JodhpurKanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpur
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpur
 
Kangiri Contractors
Kangiri ContractorsKangiri Contractors
Kangiri Contractors
 
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprises
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan EnterprisesITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprises
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprises
 
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, Bikaner
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, BikanerGanesh Builders vs CIT, Bikaner
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, Bikaner
 
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantia
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar TantiaDCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantia
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantia
 
DCIT Vs Saraf Export
DCIT Vs Saraf ExportDCIT Vs Saraf Export
DCIT Vs Saraf Export
 

The ITO Ward, Bikaner vs. Shree Bhagwan Suthar

  • 1. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR BEFORE SHRI HARI OM MARATHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI N.K.SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 367/Jodh/2013 (A.Y. 2008-09) The I.T.O Vs. Shri Shree Bhagwan Suthar Ward - 1(4) Prop M/s Gobind Handicrafts Bikaner Village Thukariyasar Sridungargarh PAN No. AXEPS 7940 J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Suresh Ojha Department by : Shri N.A. Joshi, DR. Date of Hearing : 28.04.2014 Date of Pronouncement : 13.05.2014 ORDER PER HARI OM MARATHA, J.M. This appeal has been filed by the revenue for A.Y 2008-09 against the order of the CIT(A), Bikaner, dated 22.03.2013.
  • 2. 2 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is the proprietor of M/s Govind Handicrafts and derives his income from the purchase and sale of handicraft items. For A.Y. 2008-09, he field his Return of Income [ROI] on 30.09.2008, declaring of total income of Rs. 1,46,340/-. On total sales of the year at Rs. 41,02,525/- he has disclosed gross profit of Rs. 4,09,977/- which gives gross profit rate of 9.99%, as against shown at Rs. 8.06% in earlier year on total sales of Rs. 36,75,015/- and gross profit of Rs. 3,16,268/-. The A.O. has computed total income of the assessee vide order dated 18.11.2010 at Rs. 11,70,888/- after making the following additions: (1) disallowance out of expenses claimed Rs. 1,73,464/- (2) addition u/s 68 of the Act Rs. 8,16,584/- (3) on account of house hold expenses Rs. 34,500/- 2.1 Aggrieved against the above addition, the assessee went in first appeal before the ld. CIT(A), who, in turn, has given part relief, against which the revenue has raised the following grounds:
  • 3. 3 "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld. CITA) has erred in :- i) deleting addition of Rs 8,16,584/- made a/s 68 of the I.T. Act,1961. ii) deleting addition of Rs. I,73,463/- made on account of disallowance out of expenses. iii) Deleting addition of RS. 34,500/- made on account of low withdrawals for household expenses." 2.2 We have heard the rival submissions and have carefully perused the entire material on record. 2.3 Ground No. (i) of this appeal pertains to deletion of an addition of Rs. 8,16,584/- added u/s 68 of the Act. The facts apropos this ground are that during the year the following credits are reflected in the balance sheet of the assessee: 1. Sita Ram Suthar 63222 2. Bhagirath Suthar 202200 3. Smt. Gita Devi Bhuwal 105333 4. Smt. Ganga Devi Suthar 52283 5. Smt. Vidya Devi Saini 271296
  • 4. 4 6. Nand Kumar Suthar 15000 7. Khinwa Ram Suthar 14500 8. Smt. Amrati Devi Suthar 12500 Total Rs. 8,16,584/- 2.4 When called upon to establish the genuinity of these 8 credits, the assessee produced duly sworn in affidavits of 6 creditors. For the remaining, the assessee produced confirmation through affidavits etc. before the ld. CIT(A). After considering the objection of the A.O., given in his remand report which was called in relation to the additional evidence, the ld. CIT(A) has admitted the same but the department has not challenged this aspect before us. We have found that the creditors, in question, have admitted their respective credits and have also explained their source(s). The A.O. has not further examined them. Therefore, as per the settled position of law in this regard that unless the A.O. controverts the averments of these affidavits, the version given therein cannot be rejected. On that reasoning only the ld. CIT(A) has deleted the impugned addition. To further bolster the above, we may incorporate the evidence produced by the assessee in respect of the creditors as under:
  • 5. 5 s. Name of the Creditors Evidence filed Evidence File Rs. No. before the CIT (A) 1. Sh. Sitaram Suthar Affidavit (Accepted by AO letter dated 18.7.2011 and WS to ITO Copy of Affidavit 63222/- by I.S. Shekhawat) Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO by I.S. Shekhawat) Acknowledgeme nt of ITR Balance Sheet Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by IS Shekhawat) Confirmation of Accounts (WS to ITO dated 26. 7. 20 10) 2 Smt. Manju Devi Suthar Affidavit (Accepted by AO letter dated 18.7.2011 and WS to ITO Copy of Affidavit 52250/- by I.S. Shekhawat) Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO by I.S. Shekhawat) Acknowledgeme nt of ITR ITR Acknowledgement (WS to ITO by I S Shekhawat) Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by I S Shekhawat and AO accepted in his order at page No. 2) Balance Sheet Confirmation of Accounts (WS to ITO dated 26. 7. 20 10) 3 Smt Vidya Devi Saini Affidavit (Accepted by AO letter dated 18.7.2011 and WS to ITO Copy of Affidavit 271296/- by I.S. Shekhawat) i Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO by I.S. Shekhawat AO accepted in his order at page No. 2) ITR Acknowledgement (WS to ITO by I S Shekhawat) Acknowledgeme nt of ITR Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by IS Balance Sheet
  • 6. 6 Shekhawat) Confirmation of Accounts (WS to ITO dated 26.7.2010) 4 Smt. Geeta Devi Bhuwal Affidavit (Accepted by AO letter dated 18.7.2011 and WS to ITO Copy of Affidavit 105333/- by I.S. Shekhawat) Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO by I.S. Shekhawat and AO accepted in his order at page No. 2) ITR acknowledgement (WS to Acknowledgeme nt ITO by I S Shekhawat) of ITR , Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by IS Balance Sheet Shekhawat) Confirmation of Accounts (WS to ITO dated 26.7 .20 10) 5 Smt. Ganga Devi Suthar Affidavit (Accepted by AO letter Copy of Affidavit 52283/- dated 18.7,2011 and WS to ITO by I.S. Shekhawat) Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO by I.S. Shekhawat) ITR acknowledgement (WS to Acknowledgeme nt ITO by I S Shekhawat) of ITR Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by IS Balance Sheet Shekhawat) Confirmation of Accounts (WS to ITO dated 26 .7 .20 10)
  • 7. 7 6 Sh. Bhagirath Suthar Affidavit (Accepted by AO letter Copy of Affidavit 202200/- dated 18.7.2011 WS to ITO by I.S. Shekhawat and AO accepted in his order at page No. 2) Bank Pass Book (WS to ITO by I.S. Shekhawat and AO accepted in his order at page No. 2) ITR acknowledgement (WS to Acknowledgeme nt ITO by I S Shekhawat) of ITR Balance Sheet (WS to ITO by IS Balance Sheet Shekhawat) Confirmation of Accounts (WS to ITO dated 26.7. 20 10) 7 Smt. Geetadevi Confirmation of Accounts (WS Affidavit 14500/- to ITO dated 26. 7 .20 10) 8 Sh. Nandram Suthar Confirmation of Accounts (WS Affidavit 15000/- to ITO dated 26.7 .2010) 9 Sh. Khinwa Ram Suthar Confirmation of Accounts (WS Affidavit 14500/- to ITO dated 26.7 .2010) 10 Smt. Imrati Devi Suthar Confirmation of Accounts (WS Affidavit 12500/- to ITO dated 26.7 .20 10) 11 Sh. Om Prakash Suthar Confirmation of Accounts (WS Affidavit 13500/- to ITO dated 26.7.2010)
  • 8. 8 2.5 The above, is the pictograph of evidence produced in respect of all the creditors, including the one we are concerned with in this appeal. Resultantly, we confirm the impugned deletion of Rs. 8,16,584/- made u/s 68 of the Act and cannot allow Ground No. (i) of revenue’s appeal. 3. The Ground No. (ii) is regarding deletion of addition of Rs. 1,73,463/- made on account of disallowance out of expenses. All these expenses are in relation to the trading activities of the assessee. The A.O. has not rejected the books of account. So he cannot disturb the expenses claimed unless any particular expenses is found to have been wrongly claimed. In this case, the A.O. has not doubted the receipts etc and have accepted the same, so the A.O. cannot reject some of the expenses. In this regard, the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Maharaja Shree Ummaid Mills Ltd. [1991] 192 ITR 565 [Raj] is relevant. Accordingly, we uphold this deletion and dismiss Ground No. (ii) of revenue’s appeal.
  • 9. 9 4. The Ground No. (iii) is regarding deletion of an addition of Rs. 34,500/- made on account of low household withdrawals. This addition is based on no material but on wild guess and pure estimation with reference to the size of the family and the standard of living. The A.O. has not brought any evidence on record, in this regard. Therefore, we approve this deletion as well and dismiss Ground No. (iii) of revenue’s appeal. 5. In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands allowed. Order Pronounced in the Court on 13th May, 2014. Sd/- Sd/- (N.K.SAINI) [HARI OM MARATHA] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated : 13th May, 2014 VL/-
  • 10. 10 Copy to: The Appellant The Respondent The CIT By Order The CIT(A) The DR Assistant Registrar ITAT, Jodhpur