SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Download to read offline
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELALTE TRIBUNAL : JODHPUR BENCH : JODHPUR
BEFORE SHRI HARI OM MARATHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
SHRI N.K. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER.
ITA No.433 /JU/2008
(A.Y. 2004-05)
The ACIT, Circle, Vs. M/s. Ganesh Builders,
Sriganganagar. 1-C-19, Jawahar Nagar,
Sriganganagar.
PAN No. AABFG 1354 Q
(Appellant) (Respondent)
Assessee by : Shri Suresh Ojha
Department By : Shri N.A. Joshi - D.R.
Date of hearing : 12/06/2014.
Date of pronouncement : 21/07/2014.
O R D E R
PER HARI OM MARATHA, J.M
This is an appeal by the department directed against the order
dated 28/03/2008 of ld. CIT(A), Jodhpur.
2. The following sole ground has been raised in this appeal:
“On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld.
CIT(A) has erred in directing to apply NP rate of 8.14% subject
to interest, remuneration to partners, depreciation and third
2
party interest as against NP rate of 8% subject to interest and
remuneration to partners when provisions of section 1435 of
the I.T. Act, 1961 are clearly applicable.”
3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a
partnership firm deriving its income from execution of contract work
undertaken from Government department. The books of account were
rejected u/s 145(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ['the Act', for short] and
net profit rate was applied. The Tribunal has also confirmed the
application of provisions of section 145(3) of the Act but the assessee had
claimed interest paid to third parties while estimating profit under this
section. This issue was stated to be covered by the decision of this very
Bench rendered in the case of M/s Ganesh Garhia Construction Co. Vs.
ACIT for A.Y. 2004-05 in ITA No. 430/JU/2008 which was also
corrected/rectified vide MA No. 04/JU/2011 vide order dated 02.05.2014.
Accordingly, the order passed by the Tribunal on 10.07.2009 in this case
was recalled and only to that extent the appeal was heard. The issue of
payment of interest to third parties being clearly covered by the Tribunal
order and their consistent view, we modify the order accordingly by
making observation that after invoking provisions of section 145(3) of the
Act in this case, interest paid to third parties is also allowable.
3
Accordingly, result of the appeal shall remain same i.e. appeal shall be
partly allowed.
4. In the result, appeal of the department is partly allowed.
(Order Pronounced in the Court on 21st
July, 2014).
Sd/- Sd/-
(N.K.SAINI) (HARI OM MARATHA)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated : 21st
July, 2014.
VL/-
Copy to:
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent
3. The ld.CIT
4. The CIT(A)
5. The D.R
Assistant Registrar,
ITAT, Jodhpur.

More Related Content

What's hot

Mar10 (1) Esi
Mar10 (1) EsiMar10 (1) Esi
Mar10 (1) EsiRaja Ram
 
Cheque bounce cases under ni act, are covered under moratorium us 14 of IBC- ...
Cheque bounce cases under ni act, are covered under moratorium us 14 of IBC- ...Cheque bounce cases under ni act, are covered under moratorium us 14 of IBC- ...
Cheque bounce cases under ni act, are covered under moratorium us 14 of IBC- ...Centrik Business Sulotions Pvt. Ltd.
 
569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_
 569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_ 569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_
569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_Mumbai Ngo
 
Letter to CJI dated 13.09.2018
Letter to CJI dated 13.09.2018Letter to CJI dated 13.09.2018
Letter to CJI dated 13.09.2018Om Prakash Poddar
 
Cal hc bail order july 30
Cal hc bail order july 30Cal hc bail order july 30
Cal hc bail order july 30sabrangsabrang
 
Sc order freedom of rel act
Sc order freedom of rel actSc order freedom of rel act
Sc order freedom of rel actsabrangsabrang
 
SC order about Muslim vendors dated - December 17, 2021.pdf
SC order about Muslim vendors   dated -  December 17, 2021.pdfSC order about Muslim vendors   dated -  December 17, 2021.pdf
SC order about Muslim vendors dated - December 17, 2021.pdfsabrangsabrang
 
Cctv camera sc order sept 16
Cctv camera sc order sept 16Cctv camera sc order sept 16
Cctv camera sc order sept 16sabrangsabrang
 
Case law knit
Case law  knitCase law  knit
Case law knitmslad
 
Sadakat khan vs state
Sadakat khan vs stateSadakat khan vs state
Sadakat khan vs stateZahidManiyar
 
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of India
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of IndiaRTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of India
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of IndiaOm Prakash Poddar
 
RTI dated 13-09-2020 against Supreme Court of India
RTI dated 13-09-2020 against Supreme Court of IndiaRTI dated 13-09-2020 against Supreme Court of India
RTI dated 13-09-2020 against Supreme Court of IndiaOm Prakash Poddar
 
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016Om Prakash Poddar
 

What's hot (19)

Mar10 (1) Esi
Mar10 (1) EsiMar10 (1) Esi
Mar10 (1) Esi
 
Mar10 (1)
Mar10 (1)Mar10 (1)
Mar10 (1)
 
Rti delhi hc judgment
Rti delhi hc judgmentRti delhi hc judgment
Rti delhi hc judgment
 
Rti suggestions to the cic-kerala-230716
Rti suggestions to the cic-kerala-230716Rti suggestions to the cic-kerala-230716
Rti suggestions to the cic-kerala-230716
 
Cheque bounce cases under ni act, are covered under moratorium us 14 of IBC- ...
Cheque bounce cases under ni act, are covered under moratorium us 14 of IBC- ...Cheque bounce cases under ni act, are covered under moratorium us 14 of IBC- ...
Cheque bounce cases under ni act, are covered under moratorium us 14 of IBC- ...
 
569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_
 569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_ 569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_
569257821928895310213$5^1 refno1725-_sahaini_social_service_society_
 
Letter to CJI dated 13.09.2018
Letter to CJI dated 13.09.2018Letter to CJI dated 13.09.2018
Letter to CJI dated 13.09.2018
 
Cal hc bail order july 30
Cal hc bail order july 30Cal hc bail order july 30
Cal hc bail order july 30
 
Gauhati hc
Gauhati hcGauhati hc
Gauhati hc
 
Sc order freedom of rel act
Sc order freedom of rel actSc order freedom of rel act
Sc order freedom of rel act
 
SC order about Muslim vendors dated - December 17, 2021.pdf
SC order about Muslim vendors   dated -  December 17, 2021.pdfSC order about Muslim vendors   dated -  December 17, 2021.pdf
SC order about Muslim vendors dated - December 17, 2021.pdf
 
Appeals in excise duty
Appeals in excise dutyAppeals in excise duty
Appeals in excise duty
 
Cctv camera sc order sept 16
Cctv camera sc order sept 16Cctv camera sc order sept 16
Cctv camera sc order sept 16
 
Case law knit
Case law  knitCase law  knit
Case law knit
 
Sadakat khan vs state
Sadakat khan vs stateSadakat khan vs state
Sadakat khan vs state
 
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of India
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of IndiaRTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of India
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of India
 
RTI dated 13-09-2020 against Supreme Court of India
RTI dated 13-09-2020 against Supreme Court of IndiaRTI dated 13-09-2020 against Supreme Court of India
RTI dated 13-09-2020 against Supreme Court of India
 
Acquisory news-bytes-21st-22nd-aug-2017
Acquisory news-bytes-21st-22nd-aug-2017Acquisory news-bytes-21st-22nd-aug-2017
Acquisory news-bytes-21st-22nd-aug-2017
 
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 19TH AUGUST 2016
 

Viewers also liked

Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagar
Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, SriganganagarPushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagar
Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagarsuresh ojha
 
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarh
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, HanumangarhAditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarh
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarhsuresh ojha
 
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarh
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, SuratgarhRadhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarh
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarhsuresh ojha
 
Kangiri Contractors
Kangiri ContractorsKangiri Contractors
Kangiri Contractorssuresh ojha
 
s. Hanumangarh Kray
s. Hanumangarh Krays. Hanumangarh Kray
s. Hanumangarh Kraysuresh ojha
 
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEE
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEENOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEE
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEEsuresh ojha
 
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprises
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan EnterprisesITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprises
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprisessuresh ojha
 
Shri Mahabir Prasad,
Shri Mahabir Prasad,Shri Mahabir Prasad,
Shri Mahabir Prasad,suresh ojha
 
Nosegay Public School
Nosegay Public SchoolNosegay Public School
Nosegay Public Schoolsuresh ojha
 
SARRAF_EXPORT vs. ITO, Ward -2, Churu JODH-2012
SARRAF_EXPORT  vs. ITO, Ward -2, Churu JODH-2012SARRAF_EXPORT  vs. ITO, Ward -2, Churu JODH-2012
SARRAF_EXPORT vs. ITO, Ward -2, Churu JODH-2012suresh ojha
 
Nosegay kindergarden
Nosegay kindergardenNosegay kindergarden
Nosegay kindergardensuresh ojha
 
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)suresh ojha
 
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantia
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar TantiaDCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantia
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantiasuresh ojha
 
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trust
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable TrustMata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trust
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trustsuresh ojha
 

Viewers also liked (15)

Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagar
Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, SriganganagarPushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagar
Pushpa Devi Singla vs. The JCIT Range, Sriganganagar
 
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarh
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, HanumangarhAditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarh
Aditya Traders vs. ITO Ward-1, Hanumangarh
 
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarh
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, SuratgarhRadhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarh
Radhey Shyam Chugh vs. ITO, Suratgarh
 
Kangiri Contractors
Kangiri ContractorsKangiri Contractors
Kangiri Contractors
 
s. Hanumangarh Kray
s. Hanumangarh Krays. Hanumangarh Kray
s. Hanumangarh Kray
 
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEE
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEENOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEE
NOSEGAY PUBLIC SCHOOL COMMITTEE
 
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprises
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan EnterprisesITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprises
ITO Ward-1, Churu vs. Gunjan Enterprises
 
Shri Mahabir Prasad,
Shri Mahabir Prasad,Shri Mahabir Prasad,
Shri Mahabir Prasad,
 
Nosegay Public School
Nosegay Public SchoolNosegay Public School
Nosegay Public School
 
SARRAF_EXPORT vs. ITO, Ward -2, Churu JODH-2012
SARRAF_EXPORT  vs. ITO, Ward -2, Churu JODH-2012SARRAF_EXPORT  vs. ITO, Ward -2, Churu JODH-2012
SARRAF_EXPORT vs. ITO, Ward -2, Churu JODH-2012
 
Nosegay kindergarden
Nosegay kindergardenNosegay kindergarden
Nosegay kindergarden
 
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)
Deep Jyoti Co. (Unit-2)
 
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantia
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar TantiaDCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantia
DCIT, Central Circle, BikanerAnil Kumar Tantia
 
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trust
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable TrustMata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trust
Mata Padmawati Shyamdaya Charitable Trust
 
Radhey Shyam
Radhey ShyamRadhey Shyam
Radhey Shyam
 

Similar to Tax Tribunal Ruling on Interest Deduction

Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, SriganganagarAnoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagarsuresh ojha
 
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagar
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 SriganganagarGouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagar
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagarsuresh ojha
 
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, SriganganagarGauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagarsuresh ojha
 
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014suresh ojha
 
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)NextBigWhat
 
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, SriganganagarGagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagarsuresh ojha
 
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, Bikaner
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, BikanerGanesh Builders vs CIT, Bikaner
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, Bikanersuresh ojha
 
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarh
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO SuratgarhPatel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarh
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarhsuresh ojha
 
Omaxe reviews - srb15042014 cw14512013
Omaxe reviews -  srb15042014 cw14512013Omaxe reviews -  srb15042014 cw14512013
Omaxe reviews - srb15042014 cw14512013omaxe-reviews
 
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singh
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singhCantonment board vs. k.p.singh
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singhkushal576
 
The ITO Ward, Bikaner vs. Shree Bhagwan Suthar
The ITO Ward, Bikaner vs. Shree Bhagwan SutharThe ITO Ward, Bikaner vs. Shree Bhagwan Suthar
The ITO Ward, Bikaner vs. Shree Bhagwan Sutharsuresh ojha
 
Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012
Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012
Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012Jomy Jose
 
Shri Virendra Singh Shekawat
Shri Virendra Singh ShekawatShri Virendra Singh Shekawat
Shri Virendra Singh Shekawatsuresh ojha
 
Case law knit
Case law  knitCase law  knit
Case law knitmslad
 
RR നടപടികൾ ഭൂ നികുതി സ്വികരിയ്ക്കുന്നതിന് തടസ്സമല്ല എന്ന ഹൈക്കോടതി വിധി-Pendi...
RR നടപടികൾ ഭൂ നികുതി സ്വികരിയ്ക്കുന്നതിന് തടസ്സമല്ല എന്ന ഹൈക്കോടതി വിധി-Pendi...RR നടപടികൾ ഭൂ നികുതി സ്വികരിയ്ക്കുന്നതിന് തടസ്സമല്ല എന്ന ഹൈക്കോടതി വിധി-Pendi...
RR നടപടികൾ ഭൂ നികുതി സ്വികരിയ്ക്കുന്നതിന് തടസ്സമല്ല എന്ന ഹൈക്കോടതി വിധി-Pendi...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
 
Amarchand Borad vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Amarchand Borad vs. ITO, Ward-1, SriganganagarAmarchand Borad vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Amarchand Borad vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagarsuresh ojha
 
National federation of_the_blind_vs_sanjay_kothari_secy_deptt_of_on_1_septemb...
National federation of_the_blind_vs_sanjay_kothari_secy_deptt_of_on_1_septemb...National federation of_the_blind_vs_sanjay_kothari_secy_deptt_of_on_1_septemb...
National federation of_the_blind_vs_sanjay_kothari_secy_deptt_of_on_1_septemb...University Five Year Law College
 
Kerala High Court Judgment on UGC NET June 2012
Kerala High Court Judgment on UGC NET June 2012Kerala High Court Judgment on UGC NET June 2012
Kerala High Court Judgment on UGC NET June 2012Anujjindal.in
 

Similar to Tax Tribunal Ruling on Interest Deduction (20)

Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, SriganganagarAnoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Anoopgarh K.V.Sah Samiti vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
 
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagar
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 SriganganagarGouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagar
Gouri Shankar Singhal vs. ITO Ward-1 Sriganganagar
 
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, SriganganagarGauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gauti Shankar vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
 
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014
Smt. Shalu Sachdeva vs. The ACIT Circle, Sriganganagar 471-2014
 
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)
Biocon vs income tax on esop (Discounted ESOPs Are Not Taxable)
 
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, SriganganagarGagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Gagandeep Kathuria vs. ITO Ward-1, Sriganganagar
 
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, Bikaner
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, BikanerGanesh Builders vs CIT, Bikaner
Ganesh Builders vs CIT, Bikaner
 
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarh
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO SuratgarhPatel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarh
Patel Educationa & Social Welfare Trust vs. ITO Suratgarh
 
Omaxe reviews - srb15042014 cw14512013
Omaxe reviews -  srb15042014 cw14512013Omaxe reviews -  srb15042014 cw14512013
Omaxe reviews - srb15042014 cw14512013
 
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singh
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singhCantonment board vs. k.p.singh
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singh
 
The ITO Ward, Bikaner vs. Shree Bhagwan Suthar
The ITO Ward, Bikaner vs. Shree Bhagwan SutharThe ITO Ward, Bikaner vs. Shree Bhagwan Suthar
The ITO Ward, Bikaner vs. Shree Bhagwan Suthar
 
Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012
Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012
Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012
 
Shri Virendra Singh Shekawat
Shri Virendra Singh ShekawatShri Virendra Singh Shekawat
Shri Virendra Singh Shekawat
 
Case law knit
Case law  knitCase law  knit
Case law knit
 
RR നടപടികൾ ഭൂ നികുതി സ്വികരിയ്ക്കുന്നതിന് തടസ്സമല്ല എന്ന ഹൈക്കോടതി വിധി-Pendi...
RR നടപടികൾ ഭൂ നികുതി സ്വികരിയ്ക്കുന്നതിന് തടസ്സമല്ല എന്ന ഹൈക്കോടതി വിധി-Pendi...RR നടപടികൾ ഭൂ നികുതി സ്വികരിയ്ക്കുന്നതിന് തടസ്സമല്ല എന്ന ഹൈക്കോടതി വിധി-Pendi...
RR നടപടികൾ ഭൂ നികുതി സ്വികരിയ്ക്കുന്നതിന് തടസ്സമല്ല എന്ന ഹൈക്കോടതി വിധി-Pendi...
 
Amarchand Borad vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Amarchand Borad vs. ITO, Ward-1, SriganganagarAmarchand Borad vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
Amarchand Borad vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sriganganagar
 
National federation of_the_blind_vs_sanjay_kothari_secy_deptt_of_on_1_septemb...
National federation of_the_blind_vs_sanjay_kothari_secy_deptt_of_on_1_septemb...National federation of_the_blind_vs_sanjay_kothari_secy_deptt_of_on_1_septemb...
National federation of_the_blind_vs_sanjay_kothari_secy_deptt_of_on_1_septemb...
 
Urgent whistleblower information 14.05.18
Urgent whistleblower information 14.05.18Urgent whistleblower information 14.05.18
Urgent whistleblower information 14.05.18
 
Takeover panorama october 2014
Takeover panorama october 2014Takeover panorama october 2014
Takeover panorama october 2014
 
Kerala High Court Judgment on UGC NET June 2012
Kerala High Court Judgment on UGC NET June 2012Kerala High Court Judgment on UGC NET June 2012
Kerala High Court Judgment on UGC NET June 2012
 

More from suresh ojha

Recording_of_statement
Recording_of_statementRecording_of_statement
Recording_of_statementsuresh ojha
 
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpur
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, JodhpurKanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpur
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpursuresh ojha
 
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makrana
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, MakranaKamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makrana
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makranasuresh ojha
 
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, SriganganagarGagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagarsuresh ojha
 
DCIT Vs Saraf Export
DCIT Vs Saraf ExportDCIT Vs Saraf Export
DCIT Vs Saraf Exportsuresh ojha
 

More from suresh ojha (6)

Copy of AIFTP
Copy of AIFTP Copy of AIFTP
Copy of AIFTP
 
Recording_of_statement
Recording_of_statementRecording_of_statement
Recording_of_statement
 
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpur
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, JodhpurKanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpur
Kanoi Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Jodhpur
 
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makrana
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, MakranaKamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makrana
Kamal Kishore Jhanwar, Classic Marbles, Makrana vs ITO Ward-1, Makrana
 
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, SriganganagarGagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
Gagan Deep Kathuria vs. ACIT, Sriganganagar
 
DCIT Vs Saraf Export
DCIT Vs Saraf ExportDCIT Vs Saraf Export
DCIT Vs Saraf Export
 

Tax Tribunal Ruling on Interest Deduction

  • 1. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELALTE TRIBUNAL : JODHPUR BENCH : JODHPUR BEFORE SHRI HARI OM MARATHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI N.K. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER. ITA No.433 /JU/2008 (A.Y. 2004-05) The ACIT, Circle, Vs. M/s. Ganesh Builders, Sriganganagar. 1-C-19, Jawahar Nagar, Sriganganagar. PAN No. AABFG 1354 Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Suresh Ojha Department By : Shri N.A. Joshi - D.R. Date of hearing : 12/06/2014. Date of pronouncement : 21/07/2014. O R D E R PER HARI OM MARATHA, J.M This is an appeal by the department directed against the order dated 28/03/2008 of ld. CIT(A), Jodhpur. 2. The following sole ground has been raised in this appeal: “On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in directing to apply NP rate of 8.14% subject to interest, remuneration to partners, depreciation and third
  • 2. 2 party interest as against NP rate of 8% subject to interest and remuneration to partners when provisions of section 1435 of the I.T. Act, 1961 are clearly applicable.” 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a partnership firm deriving its income from execution of contract work undertaken from Government department. The books of account were rejected u/s 145(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ['the Act', for short] and net profit rate was applied. The Tribunal has also confirmed the application of provisions of section 145(3) of the Act but the assessee had claimed interest paid to third parties while estimating profit under this section. This issue was stated to be covered by the decision of this very Bench rendered in the case of M/s Ganesh Garhia Construction Co. Vs. ACIT for A.Y. 2004-05 in ITA No. 430/JU/2008 which was also corrected/rectified vide MA No. 04/JU/2011 vide order dated 02.05.2014. Accordingly, the order passed by the Tribunal on 10.07.2009 in this case was recalled and only to that extent the appeal was heard. The issue of payment of interest to third parties being clearly covered by the Tribunal order and their consistent view, we modify the order accordingly by making observation that after invoking provisions of section 145(3) of the Act in this case, interest paid to third parties is also allowable.
  • 3. 3 Accordingly, result of the appeal shall remain same i.e. appeal shall be partly allowed. 4. In the result, appeal of the department is partly allowed. (Order Pronounced in the Court on 21st July, 2014). Sd/- Sd/- (N.K.SAINI) (HARI OM MARATHA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated : 21st July, 2014. VL/- Copy to: 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The ld.CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. The D.R Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Jodhpur.