suppressed and newly discovered evidence supporting allegation of conspiracy against rights, deprivation of rights under color of law and terrorist acts using chemical weapons with intent to cause serious injury

1. Poisoned by My Neighbor from Hell
The Good Old Boy Network
1
PRESENTS
SUPPRESSED AND NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE
Conspiracy against rights, deprivation of rights under color of law,
Terrorist acts using chemical weapons with intent to cause serious injury.

2. 2002 Existing Legally non conforming properties
2
Existing Property Layout legal description Boatner owner of number lots 1-6, six half lots
2003 Mark Conlee purchased property adjoining Boatners. Equal in size and description. Conlee
purchased his property from Mayor at that time Ron Dinwiddie creating an existing conflict of
interest.

3. 3
2005 Illegally nonconforming property redevelopment. Building permits issued by city are illegal

4. 2002- Mark Conlee purchased neighboring property from then, Mayor Ron Dinwiddie
In 2002 Mark Conlee purchased the property adjoining mine from Mayor Ron Dinwiddie at that time creating
a Conflict of Interest
The property is a legally non conforming property 70’w X 300’l
The City building administrator Mark Holland issued an illegal building permit for a new garage
The garage is illegally non conforming in size. It is a two story pole building. It is oversized to the degree
that Mr Conlee altered the direction of the roof surface to divert stormwater directly onto Boatner’s
property.
Mr. Conlee illegally redeveloped his property
Mr. Conlee first built a nonconforming garage.
The following year there was a suspicious fire that destroyed the existing home.
My initial complaint was in regards to a nuisance drainage issue that had caused serious adverse effects
to my property. Mr. Conlee removed an existing berm that protected my home’s structure. Mr. Conlee
also diverted all storm water runoff onto Boatner's property.
Lots 1-3 of my property was assessed soon after I mad lost value of $10,000 after Mr. Conlee’s property
redevelopment. The evidence that proves this is the County tax assessment records.
I discovered document fraud had been committed multiple times at City Hall in regards to the building
permits issued to Mark Conlee.
Mr. Conlee was angry because I complained about the storm water run off having adverse effects to
Boatner's property.
Mayor Dinwiddie implicated himself as conspirator as recorded in public record.
4

5. Conflict of Interest
conflict of interest
n. a situation in which a person has a duty to more than one person or organization, but
cannot do justice to the actual or potentially adverse interests of both parties. This
includes when an individual's personal interests or concerns are inconsistent with the best
for a customer, or when a public official's personal interests are contrary to his/her
loyalty to public business. An attorney, an accountant, a business adviser or realtor cannot
represent two parties in a dispute and must avoid even the appearance of conflict. He/she
may not join with a client in business without making full disclosure of his/her potential
conflicts, he/she must avoid commingling funds with the client, and never, never take a
position adverse to the customer.
5

6. Existing Conflicts of Interest in This Case
Property 105 N 5TH St
Mayor Ron Dinwiddie Seller
Mark Conlee Buyer
Members on Montrose Volunteer Fire Department
Mayor Ron Dinwiddie
Mark Conlee
Council Member/Building Admin Mark Holland (Chief) Council
Member Jeff Junkins
Co-workers
Council Member Jeff Junkins Council
Member Mark Conlee
Family Members
Lee County Detective Robert (Bob) Conlee Brother
Mark Conlee
Council Member Mark Holland Sister Council
Member Judy Brisby
Lee County Fema Officer Steve Cirinna husband City of Montrose Clerk Celeste
Cirinna
6

7. 7
2003-3-31 Building permit issued by Council Member Mark
Holland to Mark Conlee to build a new garage.
This is a non-conforming structure. Two story metal pole barn with
roof surface altered so that it diverts stormwater directly onto
Boatners property. Typically roof surfaces run parallel with the
owner's property. This is an oversized structure on a non typical
undersized lot.
Note that this document is signed by the builder and signed and
approved by the building administrator including issue date and
completion. I dispute this building was completed in 5 days.

8. 2005-2-3 Nuisance abatement Ordinance No. 191
Junkins - Gravel for Conlees driveway purposed to be for Glenn Van Pelt
Adopt uniform Fire Codes, Abatement dangerous building codes
PAGE 191 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 3, 2005
Ordinance No. 191. Clerk/Treasurer Cirinna told Council the City Attorney, Robert Johnson, recommends
deleting item numbers 18-24 and adopting the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Code on Abatement of
Dangerous Buildings and the Uniform Fire Code. Council agrees with this and the amended ordinance will be
on the March 3, 2005 Agenda. Councilwoman Slater suggested using the word “semi-trailers” be used in the
junk vehicle portion of the ordinance. Cirinna will check the Iowa Code regarding use of a semi-trailer without
wheels. Dinwiddie says the semi-trailer is not operable on a road anymore; the original use was on-road.
Therefore, the semi-trailer would be a nuisance.
Page 192
Moved by Holland, seconded by Brisby to approve running ads for Police Chief for 3 days in local papers. Cirinna will contact City Attorney
Robert Johnson regarding hiring Reserve Officers.
Page 193 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 3, 2005, PAGE 3
Uniform Bldg., Dangerous Bldg., & Fire Codes. Moved by Holland, seconded by Slater to adopt ordinances on
the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Code on Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, and Uniform Fire Code. All
ayes. Motion declared carried.
Councilman Jeff Junkins wants to know if the City should put gravel in the alley between Mark Conlee
and Glenn Van Pelt. After some discussion, Council says it would have to be graveled by the City
because it is Glenn Van Pelt’s only entrance to his home. Adjournment. Moved by Slater, seconded by Holland to
adjourn at 9:25 p.m. All ayes. Motion declared carried.
Respectfully Submitted, Ronald L. Dinwiddie, Mayor
Attest: Celeste L. Cirinna Clerk/Treasurer
8

9. 9
2004-7-12 Building permit issued for Mark
Conlee’s new home. Due to the poor quality of
the scanned document I have enter what is
written on the original beside the original.
New Home
Mark Conlee
7-12-04
10? North 5th St
Mark Conlee
40,000Note this document is invalid. This
document has been signed and
approved by the building administrator.
The building administrator failed to
charge a fee and failed to get the
required builder's signature. This leaves
the City of Montrose liable for and
damages and responsible for any
remedy caused by nuisance drainage
from this new property redevelopment.
3-2004
7-12-2004

10. 2005-3-3 Mayor Dinwiddie, Council Members Brisby, Junkins, Holland
Pg 197 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 3, 2005,
PAGE 2
Ordinance No. 191. Councilwoman Brisby says we had a building inspector at one time. Dinwiddie says we don’t have one now
because the City didn’t want to be responsible if they inspected a home and something happened. Brisby also states the City had a
building code at one time. Dinwiddie says that code was from the 1980’s. We are now adopting the International Building Code.
He says even if we don’t have a building inspector, if someone has a complaint the City could enforce the International Code.
Moved by Holland, seconded by Slater to pass on first reading AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF MONTROSE, IOWA 2003 BY AMENDING PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO CHAPTER 50 SO AS TO PROVIDE A NUISANCE CODE
FOR NUISANCE ENFORCEMENT. Roll call voting 4-0. Brisby, aye; Roberts, absent; Slater, aye; Junkins, aye; Holland, aye. Motion
declared carried unanimously.
10
This is almost funny, I know Dinwiddie personally, he is not an ignorant man
FYI - All Cities that issue building permits are required to have a building administrator. Mark
Holland was the appointed administrator at this time.This discussion was just after I had started
requesting some answers. This discussion is too unreasonable for this group of individuals to be so
ignorant that they do not acknowledge the City is required to comply with State laws. This is
premeditated dumbing down of the citizens attending the meeting.

11. 4-2005? First Day Skin Condition Began
11
It was a special occasion that caused me to stop my yard work and go into the house to visit with
company. When I got in the house both of my shins began to itch. This was not an ordinary itch,
such as bug bite. This was an intense itch like I have never experienced before. An independent
investigation would provide more specific information such as the exact date. My Initial thought
was that I was experiencing an allergic reaction. “Allergic reaction” is the term I used to describe
my condition. That was a reasonable opinion based on an uneducated self diagnosis. I have never
had any skin conditions prior to this, I have never had common skin conditions such as poison ivy.
Yet I have spent my life enjoying the great outdoors. This severe itching kept spreading and
getting worse. Common sense told me it must be caused by something I had never had contact
with. I live routinely the same day to day. I couldn't think of anything new that I had been
introduced to. Spring has sprung and the grass was getting green. The buds on the trees were
opening to the warm sunshine. I continued life as usual. For 10 years I enjoyed owning one quarter
of a city block in the City of Montrose, Ia. I operated a successful self educated upholstery
business from the same location. I had a comfortable home that fit my personality. I chose to
purchase this property, it provided me everything I wanted for my life, liberty and pursuit of
happiness. My Life was good. I felt complete. I enjoyed the long but narrow lot of property. I used
it as part of my physical health workout routine. I used a push mower for yard maintenance. It was
a pretty good workout and I did it on a regular basis. My property has always been well
maintained. I invested thousands of dollars renovating my shop, garage and home. Conspiracy
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law by my local government officials caused me severe

12. 4-7-2005 Conlee knowingly makes false statement there has been no excavation at the Conlee
property standard procedure would require follow-up with the complainant that all is well.
This statement is a lie. There has been no excavation of a ditch on the 5th St easement of the Conlee property.
Craig Junkins did come to the location. Using the City tractor with a rear mounted blade, he backed toward the
sidewalk,dropped the blade, pulled out and drove on down the street. He only backed the one time. Any
reasonable person recognizes excavation is not possible with a rear mounted tractor blade.
Standard procedure in assuring complaint has been resolved would come from the complainant, not from the
person the complaint was about. This is unreasonable, the fact that this was easy to determine no ditch had been
dug with a visual inspection. Intentional negligence, Conspiracy. Unequal protection of the law
PAGE 203 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR MEETING APRIL 7, 2005
The Montrose City Council met for Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. on the 7th day of April 2005. Council
met at City Hall, 102 S. 2nd St. pursuant to law with Mayor Ronald Dinwiddie presiding and the
following Council members present: Brisby, Holland, Roberts (entered at 7:05) and Slater. Junkins
absent.
Call to Order. Meeting called to order at 7:00 p.m.
5. Drainage ditch. Mark Conlee spoke with Council regarding runoff from his property into a
neighbor’s yard. He says Craig Junkins dug a trench and all is well now.
12

13. 4-7- 2005 min Adoption of International Building Codes
OLD BUSINESS
Ordinance No. 191. Moved by Holland, seconded by Brisby to pass the second reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF MONTROSE, IOWA 2003 BY AMENDING PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO CHAPTER 50 SO AS TO PROVIDE A NUISANCE CODE FOR NUISANCE
ENFORCEMENT. Roll Call Vote 4-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Moved by Holland, seconded by Slater to waive the statutory third reading of Ordinance No. 191 regarding the nuisance code. Roll Call Vote 4-0. Ordinance declared
adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor and hereby made a portion of these minutes.
Ordinance No. 192. Moved by Brisby, seconded by Holland to pass the second reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF MONTROSE, IOWA 2003 BY ADOPTING THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE. Roll Call Vote 3-1. Voting Aye: Brisby, Roberts, and Holland. Voting
Nay: Slater. Motion declared carried.
Moved by Brisby, seconded by Holland to waive the statutory third reading of Ordinance No. 192 regarding adopting Int’l Building code. Roll Call Vote 4-0. Ordinance
declared adopted, signed by the Mayor and hereby made a portion of these minutes.
Ordinance No. 193. Moved by Holland, seconded by Roberts to pass the second reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF MONTROSE, IOWA 2003 BY ADOPTING THE UNIFORM CODE ON ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS. Roll Call Vote 4-0. Motion declared
carried unanimously.
Moved by Holland, seconded by Roberts to waive statutory third reading of Ordinance No. 193 regarding abatement of dangerous buildings. Roll Call Vote 4-0.
Ordinance declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor and hereby made a portion of these minutes.
Ordinance No. 194. Moved by Roberts, seconded by Holland to pass the second reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF MONTROSE, IOWA 2003 BY ADOPTING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE. Roll Call Vote 4-0. Motion declared carried Moved by Brisby, seconded by Slater to
waive statutory third reading of Ordinance No. 194 regarding Uniform Fire Code. Roll Call Vote 4-0. Ordinance declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
PAGE 206 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 7, 2005, PAGE 4
Ordinance No. 195. second reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MONTROSE, IOWA 2003 BY AMENDING
TREES. Roll Call Vote: 3-1. Voting Aye: Roberts, Brisby, and Holland. Voting Nay: Slater.
Moved by Brisby, seconded by Holland to waive statutory third reading of Ordinance No. 195 regarding trees. Roll Call Vote 4-0. Ordinance declared adopted, signed
by the Mayor and hereby made a portion of these minutes.All ayes. Motion declared carried.
13

14. 2005-5-5 Dinwiddie implicates himself. Junkins admits he talked with Conlee prior to meeting.
This public record is enough to support conspiracy. I am also including discussion at this meeting that
is not recorded as part of this meetings public record.
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING MAY 5 , 2005, PAGE 2 PAGE 209
Drainage Problem Between Boatner-Conlee Homes. Melody Boatner voiced concerns. that Mark Conlee
continues to divert water onto her property. She stated that the water diverted onto her property is
causing damage. She checked with State Building Code laws and according to Ms. Boatner Mr. Conlee is
in violation. She asked if Council was going to uphold State law.
Discussion followed. Roberts questioned the City’s liability since we issued the building permit.
Mayor Dinwiddie said residents sign the building permit Stating they will abide by state code.
“At this time I produced the building permit for Conlees home, designed by builder. There was no response from
anyone present at this meeting. Multiple request for the building administrator to come to the location were refused.”
Councilman Junkins said he talked to Mark Conlee and according to Mr. Conlee his lawyer told him there wasn’t a
problem.
Brisby said she and Holland have also driven by the properties.
Mayor Dinwiddie felt that if there is a dispute between Boatner-Conlee the issue should be solved between the
property owners but he will contact the City Attorney and get back with Boatner regarding property disputes.
14
Conlees reference to his "lawyer" is not a lawyer, but his brother Lee County
Detective Robert Conlee

15. 5-5-2005 Reasonableness explained, in case you didn’t catch it on the previous page.
1. Melody Boatner voiced concerns. that Mark Conlee continues to divert water onto her property.
a. Nuisance drainage ordinance exists however it is ignored on all occasions.
2. Roberts questioned the City’s liability since we issued the building permit.
3. Mayor Dinwiddie said residents sign the building permit Stating they will abide by state code.
a. Building permit was not signed by builder
4. Mayor Dinwiddie felt that if there is a dispute between Boatner-Conlee the issue should be solved
between the property owners but he will contact the City Attorney and get back with Boatner regarding
property disputes.
a. I was not contacted as to the City Attorney's opinion.
b. Mayor Dinwiddie states he believes it's a private issue after an unsigned building permit is
submitted to him. He also stated the signature of the builder on permits alleviate City liability.
c. A witness will testify that she overheard Mayor Dinwiddie telling a citizen that Conlee has done
nothing wrong. If Dinwiddie believes it to be a private issue he is in violation of ethics by giving
his opinion in public. Dinwiddie knew full well that Conlee’s redevelopment was illegal.
5. Councilman Junkins said he talked to Mark Conlee and according to Mr. Conlee his lawyer told him
there wasn’t a problem. ‘
a. Evidence supports Conlee did not talk to a lawyer until later in the fall, Sept.
6. Brisby said she and Holland have also driven by the properties.
a. Brisby admits she and building official Mark Holland (Brisby's brother) drove by. My request was
for her to stop by so I could point out to her the adverse effects that Mark Conlee’s illegal
property redevelopment were causing my property.
b. She states Mark Holland drove by, he was appointed to represent the State building official, he
had a duty to address my concerns. What reason was it that in this property redevelopment that 15

16. 2005-5-13 Expert Robert Dodds letter advising Mayor Dinwiddie drainage and permits
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY University
Extension PO. BOX 70 Donnellson, Iowa
52625 800-211-9328
www.extension.UsMie.edu/ke
May 13, 2005
Ms. Melody Boatner
BOX 328
Montrose, IA 52639
Dear Ms Boatner,
I will do my best to answer your questions regarding building permits and drainage issues. Since I am not an attorney
or an engineer I can share with you information, from an educational perspective, which is accurate and hopefully
helpful.
A building permit is a license required by city code that grants legal permission to construct or enlarge a building. A
building permit addresses such tilings as size, height, type of construction, materials to be used as well as utilities
and in addition excavation and/or fill land as well as drainage and collection of surface water and so on. A building
permit is a signed legal document between the person or business wishing to construct the building and the city. The
city represents the wishes of the community and the individual agrees to comply with the city's ordinances and state
laws which regulate construction. You asked about drainage and Iowa Law. The Iowa Drainage laws prevail unless a
city or county has specific codes or regulations regarding water flow, collection and drainage issues. I have enclosed
information for your review and would refer you to the Iowa Code Chapter 465. Solutions: I would encourage you to
contact the representative of the city (Approved Building Administrator) to review the site with you and the adjoining
landowner. While I am not an engineer, I believe an underground field tile which CONTINUED ON NEXT SLIDE.
16

17. 2005-5-13 Expert Robert Dodds letter advising Mayor Dinwiddie drainage and permits pg 2
would be attached to the eave spouts of the new home and the pole building would be helpful in diverting runoff water
from the roofs of both structures and would be a beneficial to both properties. The water in front of all homes on the
block should flow to the street into the existing drainage system. It is years like 1993 that raises the importance of
planning for drainage in a building permit. You asked about securing permits and the process.I would encourage you
to contact the Montrose City Hall with questions about the steps and process. I will say that as a resident of
Montrose, I secured a permit for an outside building and the cost was $72.00 in 1996.1 met with John Geyer in March
at the site and we reviewed the blueprints for the building, contractor's directions and site preparation plans. The
permit was issued in April and construction began in July with Mr. Geyer visiting the site at the completion of the
project. Signatures were required by me and Mr. Geyer prior to any construction beginning. If the copies you shared
with me were of the original on the new home and the new building. I am surprised at the lack of a signature and fees
assessed for the permits of $10 and $0.
I hope this is helpful. I would like to stress the importance of contacting professionals who can review my comments
as well as provide you greater detail to your questions.
Robert E. Dodds
Lee County Extension Education Director
Cc: Mr. Ron Dinwiddie. Mayor. City of Montrose
17

18. 2005-5-17 Chief Shipman takes oath of office, advised “he’s the
boss”
PAGE 214
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING
SPECIAL MEETING
MAY 17, 2005
The Montrose City Council met for Special Meeting at 5:30 p.m. on the 17th day of May 2005. Council met at City Hall, 102 S. 2nd
St. pursuant to law with Mayor Ronald Dinwiddie presiding and the following Council members present: Brisby, Holland, Roberts,
and Slater. Junkins absent.
Call to Order. Meeting called to order at 5:32 p.m.
At this time, Mayor Dinwiddie appointed Brent Shipman, Chief of Police. Shipman took the Oath of Office.
Councilman Holland told Shipman he is the boss now and he is supposed to make a monthly schedule. Shipman is to put it in
Holland’s box at City Hall every month.
Councilwoman Brisby told Shipman to get out and introduce himself to the community. She says she will go with him if he wants
because there isn’t anyone she doesn’t know.
Mayor Dinwiddie says if Shipman has needs anything, give anyone a call.
Adjournment. Moved by Roberts, seconded by Slater to adjourn at 5:40 p.m. All ayes. Motion declared carried.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ronald L. Dinwiddie, Mayor
Attest:Celeste L. Cirinna
Clerk/Treasurer
18

19. 2005-6-2 Nuisance abatement letters Mark Holland
PAGE 219
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 2, 2005, PAGE 4
Holland and Slater say they would like to see a letter go to all residents letting them know the City will
be enforcing the nuisance and junk cars ordinance. The ordinance will not be mailed; instead it will be
posted at City Hall, KSB Bank, the Post Office and Library.
19

20. At our first meeting I was assured Mr. Swan was qualified to represent My case in court. I questioned him to
insure he was knowledgeable to property law and he knew the answers to my questions. I was referred to Mr. Swan by
former City of Montrose Chief of Police John Farmer, now employed by Lee County Sheriff's Dept. Mr. Swan told me
that officer Farmer had briefed him on my case. He kindly agreed to barter the fee for upholstery service. He said that
Farmer mentioned that I wasn't wealthy by any means. Swan specified that we would sue both parties the City and
Conlee adding, the City is where the money is. I was well aware of this fact Boatner Had printed a copy of NO ADVERSE
IMPACT AND THE COURTS that I included with the case evidence I submitted to Steve Swan this day.
In hindsight I now finds it suspicious that Steve Swan also told me that he had talked to Lee County Deputy Bob
Conlee (Mark Conlee’s brother) and laughingly said that Bob lied to him. Bob told him Mark had not altered the grade or
brought in fill dirt at all. Just put the slab down on the existing soil.
Mr. Swan advised me at this first meeting that Lee County Detective Bob Conlee had already lied to him
about his brothers property redevelopment? Why would Steve Swan throw me under the bus as he did. I can only find it
reasonable the Mark Conlee paid him a bribe. I can also assume that an investigation will have discovered evidence
that a payment did occur and according to Steve Swan’s statement, he owes me money for overpayment.
Swan sent the letter of intent that same afternoon.
Conlee began removing existing evidence proving my case. I emailed and left phone messages for Mr.
Swan to file the injunction. I never heard a word from him and he did not follow through on the content in the letter of
intent. In fact Mr. Swan did nothing on behalf of my best interest after he sent this letter.
20
2005-6-21 Steve Swan Attorney for Boatner, Intentional Negligence, Conspiracy Deprivation of
Rights. No reasonable attorney could overlook the number of key pieces of evidence to be
submitted to the court

21. 21
2005-6-21 Letter of Intent in regards to drainage issue by At&t. Steve Swan on My behalf. Evidence proving Conlee
and Greg Johnson committed perjury in their closing argument to the court. This clearly affected the Judge's
decision.

22. 2005-7-7 building permit discussion
PAGE 221
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 7, 2005
The Montrose City Council met for Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. on the 7TH day of July 2005. Council met at City Hall, 102 S. 2nd St. pursuant to
law with Mayor Ronald Dinwiddie presiding and the following Council members present: Brisby, Holland, Junkins, Roberts and Slater.
Kevin Hartman asked, “If no one gets a building permit, then the City can’t do anything?” Dinwiddie says yes, there is a policy. Councilwoman
Brisby says if it is new construction, then the City doesn’t turn on the water. Roberts says maybe the building permits can be posted in City Hall.
Dinwiddie says anyone can let City Hall know who is building without a permit. If they are building without the permit, they will be told to stop
immediately. Brisby says she hopes people will do the right thing and get a permit. Roberts says Cirinna should post something in the window
regarding permits and what they are needed for. The list of permits should also be posted in the window. Mary Hemmie says the information
should be put on the utility bills.
22

23. 23
5-7-2005 This photo was taken. When I first saw the chemicals I verbally told Mr. Conlee not to apply
anything to my property again. I immediately followed up by locating newly hired Chief of Police Brent
Shipman (whom I had never met before) requesting an incident report.

24. 7-5-2005 Lee County Attorney. I contacted Lee County Attorney Mike Short. I explained to Mr. Short that Mark Conlee was
applying something to my property without my permission that I believed I was allergic to. A conflict of interest existed between
Lee County Officer Bob Conlee and Mike Short. Working as a team for 18 years to arrest and prosecute criminals in Lee County.
Lee County Attorney Mike Short advised me that he would decide who gets prosecuted in Lee County. He
proceeded to charge me with criminal harassment, the case got dismissed, because it is not a crime to give
anyone the finger. It is my opinion that a successful prosecution would have to have more evidence than “Mark
Conlee said Mel Boatner gave him the finger”. Conflict of interest, conspiracy deprivation of rights under color of
law?
24

25. Holland and Junkins will get together to look at properties for the nuisance ordinance. To enable Frivolous attack on
me.
He says he has a letter from the State Ombudsman’s office requesting copies of building permits. She stated to him
that someone at City Hall told her they could not help her. My request for investigation to Ombudsman dismissed
Holland wants a work schedule from Shipman. Holland doesn’t want the deputies at home on call; if they do, he wants
their salary cut to $2.00. He wants the police walking around shaking hands at events. He wants them more visible in
town. There was trouble with people parking on Main Street during the Metzinger dedication. At this point, Dinwiddie
stopped Holland and says no more comments about employees in a public meeting. Holland wants to know when he is
supposed to make those comments. Dinwiddie says anywhere except a public meeting. Why is this discussed in
private and not at the public meetings>
25
2005-7-7 min Holland Junkins nuisance abatements

26. 8-4-2005 Nuisance inquiry Junkins
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 4, 2005, PAGE 4
PAGE 230
Junkins asked if the nuisance letters were ready to go. Cirinna said she had not received the
list from Junkins or Holland. Holland tells Cirinna to send a copy of the ordinance with each
letter.
Adjournment. Moved by Brisby, seconded by Slater to adjourn at 9:06 p.m. All ayes. Motion
declared carried.
I would also like to note that nuisance drainage is also a violation of city
nuisance ordinances. However my complaint about Mark Conlee’s
nuisance drainage to my property caused by his illegal nonconforming
property redevelopment was never recognized by any of the city council
members.
Conflict of interest, conspiracy against rights, deprivation of rights under
color of law.
26

27. Boatner SideConlee side
27
2005-6-00 Neighbor Continues To Apply Poison To Boatner's Property, July 2005
I placed railroad ties along the 300’
common boundary shared with
Mark Conlee in May 2005 to divert
the stormwater from flooding her
property toward the City drainage
ditch. Any reasonable person could
determine by the blueprints Conlee
was intending to divert stormwater
onto my property. Mark Holland at
no time followed standard
procedure, Holland issued and
approved the construction prior the
the construction. This is not an
error, this is a conspiracy
deprivation of right under color of
law.
Public record shows several Council
Members claiming they drove by
and did not see chemicals It is
unreasonable they could not have
seen this 300’ long property that I
owned. This photo taken in July
2005 shows a section of the 300’
common boundary between Mr.
Conlee and I. The entire 300’ was
as it is in this photo. I contacted all
City Officials however Council
member Cathy Roberts Farnsworth
was the only member to show the
professional courtesy to come to
location as requested.
Lee County Attorney Michael Short explained that “Mark Conlee said” he only put chemicals at the base of the fence. Easy to see he put it on
Boatner's side of the fence. Michael Short directly violated my 14th Amendment Rights. The fact that Conlee was unstoppable in his determination
to apply chemicals to my property implicates him having the intent to cause me bodily harm or death.

28. Terrorist acts using chemical weapons with intent to cause serious injury.
28
With every frivolous criminal complaint against me being dismissed, Conlee only became more aggressive
with the chemicals had been applying to my property. Certainly without my permission. The fact that
these chemicals were applied on my side of the a 300’ common boundary that Mr Conlee and I Share it
was obvious that Mr. Conlee did this in retaliation for me complaining about drainage.
His motive was to use the chemicals to force me from my property. He could not have accomplished his
goal if it were not for the assistance of his family and friends holding a position of authority in the City of
Montrose and in Lee County, Iowa.
He needed my property to get his illegal nonconforming redevelopment recorded on the County plat map.
Mark Conlee’s tactics, in my opinion, are comparable with those that define a
psychopath. Who continues to do something illegal, to the property of another
person knowing that person believes what he is doing is causing serious health
problems?

29. 29
Skin Condition spreads
My skin condition continued to spread. This is my arm. I repeatedly requested the incident report
from Officer Shipman. He continued to tell me that he would get it to me.

30. I requested every local and State person of higher authority to intervene with the unlawful application of chemicals to
my property. All refused to me equal protection of the law stating that they did not have the authority. My condition was
full body by this time. I was unable to wear clothes and unable to work. I was suffering severely. I informed Steve Swan
of my status expecting him to amend the complaint to include chemical exposure.
30
progressing

31. 31
Right to enjoy Property
I lost the enjoyment of my property not only due to the chemicals but also due to the fact that
every time I would go out in my yard Mr. Conlee would make his presence known. He would make his
presence known then just glare at me or anyone associated with me.
It was the day that he hollered across the fence that he was over the setbacks standards required
by state law that I decided to install a privacy curtain. Fully within my legal right, allowing for the
encroachment, I erected a conduit frame and stretched industrial landscaping fabric down the property
line to serve as a privacy curtain. My technique was bare bones conduit and pipe clamps but it served my
purpose well. Welcome to the City of Montrose, Iowa MINUTES 10-6-05 proves Mark Conlee has a
vendetta against me.
I was able to defend my property using my Constitutional Rights. I was unable to defend myself
from illegal toxic chemicals being applied ongoing for 5+ years. I would have had to use her right to bear
arms and kill the perpetrator dead. I was put into an unreasonable situation by local officials. Denied
equal protection of the law. My property was taken without just compensation.

32. 32
Compelling Witness List
My first meeting with Steve Swan I presented this list of
witnesses. Steve Swan was seemingly impressed, stating this
list of witnesses would be considered experts in their own right
and the list is compelling in itself.
Steve Swan did not submit any the written affidavits or
question any of these witnesses who were subpoenaed on the
stand to testify orally in Court. Not one relevant question to any
one of these compelling witnesses.
Mr. Conlee and his Attorney, Craig Johnson committed
multiple counts of perjury under oath which the judge cites in
his written decision.
The first witness to take the stand was Jake Holland.
Jake was prepared to testify that the berm did retain water to
the Conlee property. Jake was a former tenant of the property
when owned by Mayor Ron Dinwidde. Swan asked Jake no
questions. I asked Swan “why” he didn’t question him. Swan
told me the judge uses his common sense. Steve Swan did not
submit the affidavit written by Jake Holland.
These acts are not that of what a reasonable Attorney
would do in representing a client.
SUPPRESSED

33. My request for an incident report stating that I verbally told Mark Conlee not to ever apply anything to my property again
were finally received the first shown here is 16 months later. I told Officer Shipman the information was insufficient.
The second, better. A witness disputes that this report was lost as claimed by Officer Shipman. Soon after Shipman
was forced to resign I was told. 33
I told Shipman this
was not sufficient
Report #2

34. 2005-9-1
2005-9-1 min Hardship petitions approved
prior to when Boatner applying for a hardship assistance
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 1, 2005, PAGE 2
Hardship Petition for Utility Customers. Cirinna told Council three utility customers filed Hardship
Petitions. Cirinna recommends Council grant them the Hardship. Moved by Slater, seconded by
Roberts to accept three Hardship Petitions. All ayes. Motion declared carried.
34

35. Steve Swan did nothing on my behalf. Oct. 20th 2005 I received notice that I was the defendant
35

36. 36
SUPPRESSED
SUPPRESSED
ridiculous demand
Evidence
Conlee wanted
my property
6-5-2006 Had My attorney Steve Swan submitted this evidence to the court the Judge would
recognize this as admission from Mark Conlee that he was responsible for the damage and
drainage nuisance to my property. The conditions are ridiculous.

37. Compelling Witness statements, Suppressed evidence, key evidence withheld from court by At&t.
Steve Swan conspired to deprive me of my rights, no attorney is so incompetent
37
Jake is
Building
Admin.
Holland's son
states Conlee
unreasonable to
cooperate in my
having a ditch
dug
Gary is Mayor
Dinwiddie's
brother
Tampering with witnesses
Conlee approached both of these
witnesses requesting they include a
sentence that he had composed.

38. “Compelling witness” statements Suppressed Evidence withheld from the Court by Swan
Steve Swan conspired to deprive me of my right s
38
previous owner of
Boatner property
Tonya did testify for
Conlee, but the judge
misquoted her. She
testified almost word
for word same thing
that Stuart testified to.
certified
landscaper and
long time
neighbor of the
properties

39. 39
Finding of Facts

40. I was homebound by this time. Steve Swan was well aware of the
seriousness of my condition. He failed to notify me that a decision had
been made was intentional. I was informed by witness Sally Fowler who
overheard Mark Conlee saying he had won this case. I did go to the post
office and get my mail. The decision was there with only 7 days to file an
appeal. The judge erred as to Conlee’s witness testified to on the stand.
Swan refers to her as “that one witness”. Swan was aware that the Judge
in this case erred in what the Judge claims the witness stated.
The witness stated that there was never any run off from Conlee
property.
Swan violated ethical standards. He says that he was charging me $200,
yet I was billed for the amount of $4000. I filed a complaint but of course
they sided with the attorney. He never sent me a bill after that. I have
receipts showing he owes me money. I overpaid according to Swan’s
email response.
Knowing that I was physically disabled and not submitting the evidence is
not what a reasonable Attorney would do.
Not notifying me that a decision was made was not reasonable Attorney
would do.
Finding out by a neighbor that a decision had been made with only 7
days to appeal is not what a reasonable Attorney would do.
Conspiracy Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Steve Swan
40

41. 2006 Brings Big Changes in City of Montrose Government
41
➔ 2006 Elections, First time since 1995 Dinwiddie does not run. (He is building new home).
◆ New Mayor-Tony Scumbatio
● I following standard procedure, addresses Scumbaito Council in regards to drainage issue
● Dinwiddie attending as a citizen takes over the meeting from his seat in the audience knowingly making false statements
● My attempts to bring to attention to new Mayor letter from Bob Dodds, Mark Holland as citizen jumps up gets in my face in order
to cause a distraction from the people and suppress free speech
Celeste Cirinna, City of Montrose Clerk, admits to two counts of document fraud
◆ Mark Conlee elected to City Council
● Mark Conlee intent to use his position to act on vendetta against me
○ Evidence referred to in this complaint “Mark Conlee said” I gave him the finger.
Nuisance drainage code is never recognized by the City officials

42. Field Investigator collects samples
42

43. Glyphosate
At the time when the Field Investigator arrived to take statements from
those affected I had been suffering for two years.. I told him that she just
wanted to know what the chemical was in order for me to get more specific
medical attention. He suggested that I go to City Hall and inquire because
the results of the tests would not get back from the lab for several months. I
asked him how common is it that a City applies chemicals illegally? He
stated to her that it's unheard of. UNPRECEDENTED!
I did go to the City Council meeting and following standard procedure to get
the floor. I stated to the City Council that I was there to find out what exactly
the chemical was that was applied to her property. I needed to know in
order to get proper medical attention.
Not one person uttered a word. Silence fell over the room. Mark Conlee
was sitting in his seat as a council member. They all just looked at each
other. The following day I stopped Street Dept Manager Craig Junkins in
the street. I told him how cruel thought it was that no Council Member had
an answer or even suggested they would try to find out what the chemical
was.
Craig advise me the reason nobody offered any information was because
nobody knew that chemicals were being applied to the City's stormwater
ditch on my property.
43

44. 44
Warning to City of Montrose
From Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship

45. May 23, 2008 Chief of Police Brent Shipman conspires to
violate me Right to Enjoy Property Under Color of Law
45
Mark Conlee said announced me on May 22, 2008 that he was going to
move the rail road ties. Chief Shipman was accompanying Conlee,
Shipman told me that he was acting in the capacity of a “witness” that
Mark was giving me advance notice that he intended to move objects on
myproperty
stabs broken off, plastic edging pulled up and laying on top of soil?
Lawn Edging
Pulled Out

46. Physical Effects of Chemical Exposure
Unlawfully Applied to My Property Without My Permission With the Intent to
Cause Serious injury.
Conlee’s Motive Was to Acquiring My Property for Himself.
For Without It He Would Never Be Able To Comply To State Law.
46

47. PAGE 254 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 2, 2006 , PAGE 3
Nuisance Abatement. Sciumbato says he drove around town and noticed some property owners
have cleaned up, but others have more junk, trash and vehicles than before the abatement letters
were sent last September. After some discussion, Conlee and Roberts of the Public Safety Committee
say they will look at the nuisances. They will submit a list of nuisances to Cirinna, she will write a letter
to property owners and they want the Police Chief to deliver them by hand.
47
2006-3-2 Nuisance abatement. Conlee self-appointed to Public Safety
Committee
Conlee out to get me, no regard for a “conflict of interest “ or committing criminal
offenses of any kind. He was exempt from prosecution by City police and Lee
County Attorney Mike Short. I received nuisance abatement notices every time
they sent them, I am the reason the City began sending them, I plead not guilty
every time, Because I am not guilty to violating ordinances that are made up by
the City clerk specifically for me.
Document fraud is a criminal offense however, being she was acting on behalf of
Mark Conlee she was also exempt after Lee County Attorney Mike Short found out
the identity of the person I first anonymously told him about on the telephone,

48. 2006-6-1 Conlee works on nuisance abatement regarding tall
grass PAGE 272
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 1, 2006, PAGE 3
Cemetery Deed. Marilyn Bennett would like to sell two graves, but she is unable to find her parent’s cemetery deed. It
is City policy to have the seller produce the original deed. Staff will check with City Attorney to see if anything can be
done.
Nuisance Abatement. Roberts and Conlee will work on nuisance abatement regarding tall grass.
Hiring Officer. Jason Dinwiddie has quit. Shipman would like to hire another officer. Slater says this would be a good
opportunity to curb the budget. Moved by Roberts, seconded by Conlee to consider replacing a part-time officer. Ayes:
Conlee and Roberts. Nay: Slater. Motion declared carried.
48
Uh-oh this is going to be a tough one for me to comply with, Mark
Conlee sprays illegally sprays chemicals on my property then I am
forced to be exposed to them by a newly adopted ordinance regarding
the height of grass, Yes I had options one was to put a bullet between
his eyes, but it's not my nature to be aggressive. Even when someone is
poisoning me. Conflict of interest, conspiracy against rights!

49. 2006-7-13 Conlee discussion about nuisances. Regulating fences
Part-time Police Officer. Police Chief Shipman told Council he would like to hire two officers and
they would work sixteen hours a month each. This would be eight hours every other week. The
Veteran’s Preference Law states a position must be posted no less than ten days before hiring. Moved
by Roberts, seconded by Conlee to post the application for two part-time police officers with
Mayor/Police chief drawing up a job description. The deadline for applications is 4:00 p.m. July 24,
2006. All ayes. Motion declared carried.
Committee Reports.
Councilman Conlee and Councilwoman Roberts say the City looks really good. They will give staff a
list of about seventeen properties that need a nuisance abatement letter.
Regulating Fences. Mayor says he doesn’t want to see property owner’s rights taken away. The
public safety committee will study fence regulations.
49

50. 2006-8-3 min Conflict of interest! Conlee knowingly makes false statement about my property
PAGE 281
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3, 2006 PAGE 3
Conlee stated there is brush in the ditch one block off Main Street and this would impede the flow of
water.
FYI This statement was about my property. This is another count of a false statement
made by Mark Conlee. I had my trees trimmed and the trimmers did lay them in the
ditch, however I had put them in their proper place before the day ended & before Conlee
could make a frivolous complaint about me. Conflict of interest!
50

51. 9-7-2006 Conlee discusses nuisance abatement compliance & culverts The
ordinance No, 202 is very relevant in this case follow along and you will see.
PAGE 283 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 7, 2006,
PAGE 2
Committee Reports. Public Safety: Councilman Conlee says a couple of property owners have not
complied with the recent nuisance abatement notices. Citations will be issued.
Ordinance No. 202, Fences. Council discussed the ordinance and the following sentence will be
deleted: “It is recommended that the owner of a fence shall provide and maintain a two-foot setback
from adjoining private property for the purpose of fence maintenance access.” No further action
was taken. The first reading of the ordinance will be October 5, 2006.
Culverts. Mayor says the Tenth Street culvert has been taken care of. He says most culverts are
completely blocked. Craig Junkins, Street Superintendent says some culverts are driveway entrances and
who would pay for those culverts? He also said many of these culverts aren’t actual culverts. Sometimes
people use hot water jackets. Mayor says the City’s policy is to keep the culverts open. Junkins wants to
know if the city or property owner will pay for the culvert. At this time, discussion was ended by Mayor.
It is a Cities DUTY to maintain the streets, everything from the sidewalk to the51

52. 9-7-2006 Culvert discussion
Mayor, Council, Employee Comments. Conlee asked Mayor why council can’t talk about the culverts.
Mayor responded that he gets negative feedback. Conlee and Slater says what Junkins said was not
negative. They want to know if the city will pay for the driveway entrance. Mayor asked Junkins about fixing
Maria Gonzalez’s culvert in the alley. Junkins says he fixed the culvert in the city alley. It was decided a
letter will be sent to property owners asking them to unplug their culverts. If not, the city will do it and
assess the cost to the property owned. Moved by Conlee, seconded by Slater to make contact with owners
of private driveway culverts and notify them of City Code 135.12. All ayes. Motion declared carried.
52
When I bought my place in 1995 I hand dug the ditches, I guess I should have accessed the cost to
the City. Conlee removed the existing driveway, changed the frontage of his home and put in a
new driveway on the other end of his lot. All driveway removal and installs require special permits.
Unless you are Mark Conlee, he can do anything to his property, is the statement on one of the
letters submitted in the discovery of the civil case he filed against me. His case was against me for
doing something on my property. That is the kind of thinking only a narcissist can find logic in.
Only in Lee County where the County Attorney decides who gets prosecuted does this happen.

53. 2006-10-5 min Boatner addresses Council. Conlee does not recuse himself. Junkins
question. Mayor Scuimbatos response.
Public Forum. Melody Boatner says Mark Conlee’s building permit is not valid, he didn’t pay for his
permit and he shouldn’t be sitting on the committee. She says she doesn’t want weeds anymore and
doesn’t want the city to use roundup because it harms aquatic life. She handed the mayor a letter from
Bob Dodds of the Lee County Extension office and a printout regarding government ethics. She says
the private case was dismissed and she feels harassed. She says Councilwoman Roberts was the
only person to show concern. Ms. Boatner says we should all live in harmony.
At this time, Sally Sandquist asked for a moment of silence for Gene DePew.
Junkins asked if Council was going to address Ms. Boatner’s issues. Sciumbato said the City will
continue with nuisance abatements. Note “No recognition of nuisance drainage code”
Committee Reports. Public Safety – Conlee says out of sixteen or eighteen nuisances, all but two
have complied. He thanked those who complied.
Auxiliary Police Officer. Shipman told Council he is certified to teach Kent Brisby everything he
needs. Brisby will assist the Chief and other officers. Kent Brisby lacks a firearms permit. Brisby stated
he would move up if a current officer resigned.
53

54. 2006-10-5 min
PAGE 288 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 5, 2006 , PAGE3
Ordinance No. 202. Moved by Geyer, seconded by Conlee to pass on first reading AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MONTROSE, IOWA 2003 BY
ADDING A NEW CHAPTER REGARDING FENCES. Roll call voting 4-0 aye. Geyer, aye; Junkins,
aye; Slater, aye; Conlee, aye. Roberts absent.
PAGE 288 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 5, 2006 , PAGE3
responsibility. Conlee moves, Slater seconded to go forward with hiring Kent Brisby as an auxiliary
police officer, to be paid one dollar per year. All ayes. Motion declared carried
54

55. 2006-10-5 min
Ordinance No. 202. Moved by Geyer, seconded by Conlee to pass on first reading AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MONTROSE, IOWA 2003 BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER
REGARDING FENCES. Roll call voting 4-0 aye. Geyer, aye; Junkins, aye; Slater, aye; Conlee, aye. Roberts absent.
Ordinance No. 202. Moved by Geyer, seconded by Conlee to pass on first reading AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MONTROSE, IOWA 2003 BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER
REGARDING FENCES. Roll call voting 4-0 aye. Geyer, aye; Junkins, aye; Slater, aye; Conlee, aye. Roberts absent.
Strategic Planning. On the advice of former Mayor Ron Dinwiddie, staff will look up the Hazard Mitigation Plan done in
1997. Moved by Conlee, seconded by Geyer to table Strategic planning bids until the Hazard Mitigation Plan has been
reviewed. All ayes. Motion declared carried.
Hardship Petitions. Moved by Slater to approve two water/sewer hardship petitions. Motion died for lack of a second.
PAGE 289 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 5, 2006, PAGE 4
Council Appointment. Cirinna presented council a letter from Cathy Roberts stating that due to her husband’s illness,
she was resigning immediately. Sciumbato asked Cirinna to convey to Roberts that we would help her in any way we
can. Moved by Geyer, seconded by Slater to consider replacing Roberts by appointment at the November 2, 2006
meeting according to Iowa law and City Ordinance. All ayes. Motion declared carried.
55

56. 11-2-2006 Mark Holland appointed to council, keeping the criminal alliance
Page 297 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 2, 2006 , PAGE 3
Appoint Council Person. Councilwoman Slater would like to hear from each prospective council person. Mark
Holland says he saw to the nuisance abatements, water improvements, and would like to better the city. He enjoyed
being on council and wants to get back in.
Kevin Hartman ran for Montrose city council several years ago. He served on the Planning & Zoning Committee in
Wapello.
Dave Beelman says he has made a solid investment in the community and wants to see things move ahead. He says
Montrose has moved forward since Kevin Gregory moved to town and Beelman says because Gregory moved to town,
this allowed him to have a meat market. He would like to give back to the community.
Moved by Junkins, seconded by Slater to appoint Mark Holland to fill the vacancy left by Cathy Roberts’s resignation.
This position will be temporary until a special election is held at the request of petitioners. Roll Call Voting 4-0 aye.
Motion declared carried.
At this time, Mark Holland took the oath of office and joined Council.
Culverts. Moved by Slater, seconded by Conlee to approve culvert upgrades for 6th St; 7th St; and 10th Streets in an
amount not to exceed $6,500.00 and to be taken out of the Street Repair Contract. All ayes. Motion declared carried.
In a related matter, Cirinna will send a letter to the Post Office owners regarding drainage. And, the ditch on the east
and west sides of the 5th Street bridge need to be cleaned out.
I am the only one who has violated of my Federal Right to enjoy my property it
seems, conspiracy against rights, deprivation of rights under color of law.
56

57. 11-2-2006 adding new chapter regarding fences
Ordinance No. 202. Moved by Conlee, seconded by Slater to approve on second reading AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MONTROSE, IOWA
2003 BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER REGARDING FENCES. Roll Call Voting 5-0 aye.
Moved by Junkins, seconded by Slater to waive the statutory third reading of AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MONTROSE, IOWA 2003 BY
Page 298 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 2, 2006, PAGE 4
ADDING A NEW CHAPTER REGARDING FENCES. Roll Call Voting 5-0 aye. Ordinance declared
adopted, signed by the Mayor and hereby made a portion of these minutes.
57
Though I have not got it available at this moment, there is a statement on public
record that will show Mark Conlee has illegally put up a fence against what Mayor
Dinwiddie advised him of the ordinance prior to him going ahead and doing it his
way, and this is an ordinance that would make the illegal fence comply to City
ordinance. However after the fact is too little to late, this is another example of his
being exempt from being held accountable for criminal offenses, His psychopathic
personality disorder can not be disputed by the evidence I have to support that
allegation.

58. 12-7-2006 min Conlees alley cleared Hardship [petition repealed/ Cirinna says
noPAGE 301 MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 7, 2006, PAGE 3
Glenn Van Pelt, 407 Main Street complained about his alley not being plowed after the recent snowstorm. He hired
someone to plow his portion of the alley in order to get out. Mayor Sciumbato told City Clerk Cirinna to tell Street
Superintendent Junkins to plow the primary alleys after a storm. Mayor Sciumbato said he knew Mr. Junkins and Mr.
Hoenig had done a good job plowing city streets.
Gym Driveway Drainage. The Council proposed to the Post Office owner that Michael Hoenig will get an estimate of how much it will cost to repair
the drainage problem and the City will do the work. City Clerk Cirinna will be in touch with the owners.
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 7, 2006, PAGE 4
Hardship Petitions Repealed. Council Member Slater asked City Clerk Cirinna if there was anyone in Montrose giving out
money to those in need. Cirinna said no, but there are several organizations in Fort Madison and Keokuk who do. Council
Member Junkins said a customer had come up with the money needed for the utility bill after being denied the hardship.
City Clerk Cirinna said that by issuing a Hardship to someone, it makes the City a financial institution by giving the customer
credit. It puts the City Clerk and the Council in an awkward position of having to decide who does and does not truly need a
hardship waiver.
Moved by Holland, seconded by Conlee to repeal the Hardship Petitions. This will be on the January 4, 2007 agenda in the
form of an ordinance. Voting Aye: Conlee, Geyer, Junkins and Holland. Voting Nay: Slater.
Hardship Petition Nos. 1 & 2. Moved by Conlee, seconded by Junkins to deny Hardship Petitions. All
ayes. Motion declared carried. In further discussion, Hardship Petitions will be repealed by Ordinance. I
had never been in a hardship position, this was a clear act to cause me financial harm. Conspiracy against
rights, deprivation of rights under color of law,
58

59. 59
This is incomplete submission of my story. I am compiling 7+ years of relevant documentation. Much
more has yet to be included. The criminal actions of Mark Conlee and his attorney Greg Johnson in the
civil case Conlee vs Boatner EQEQ004304 which there are numerous counts of perjury.
The medical records which support I lost 90% of her eyesight due to massive amounts of steroids
administered in an attempt to offer some relief to the severe skin condition that was more likely than not,
caused by the chemicals.
The number of officials who came behind the original administration due to resignations is
unprecedented.
My right to free speech in violation of rules for addressing the Council were violated numerous times.. On
one occasion former Council Member Mark Holland attending as a citizen intentionally caused a
distraction. Standard procedure would have been to have him ejected from the meeting. On another
occasion Former Mayor Ron Dinwiddie, attending as a citizen violated the rules for addressing the
Council by making false statements as to standard procedures. Dinwiddie took control of the meeting
from Mayor Scumbaito. My opportunity to address the council timed out. Mark Conlee had the duty to
recuse himself from that portion of the meeting which he did not. I was given no answers to any questions
at any time. Mayor Scumbaito resigned 1 year into his term.
Conspiracy deprivation of rights under color of law, terrorist acts using chemical weapons with intent to cause
serious injury
This is sufficient evidence to conclude that this case violates my rights under 18 U.S. Code § 242, 18
U.S. Code § 241 and the 14TH Amendment. This is sufficient to warrant various criminal charges
against these government officials.

60. Submitted by Melody Boatner
https://poisonedbymyneighborfromhell.wordpress.com
60
This is not even close to the end of the heinous
crimes committed against me by these Racketeers,
this was a conspiracy deprivation of rights under
color of law and terrorist acts using chemical
weapons with intent to cause serious injury. I am
requesting an independent investigation in violation
of my Federal Rights