The challenge of
smart contracts
smart contracts are vulnerable and do not provide
transactional confidence
In 2017, 1.13M ETH (now roughly over 1 billion
dollars) was lost in smart contracts.
And hard forks to make these incidents “right” means
the blockchain chooses winners and losers
-Reddit post responding to the DAO 2016 hack which caused Ethereum to hard fork
Result: Increased transactional confidence in smart contracts
TRADITIONAL LEGAL IS UNABLE TO RESOLVE
SMART CONTRACT DISPUTES
• Logistically difficult to file a complaint due to lack of identity of
contracting party (there is no one to name in the complaint or serve
papers to)
• Traditional legal system lacks technical capability of enforcing any
judgment
• Ability to manually administer enforcement/collections requires that
smart contract be architected to allow for it (via our SDK)
• Unfriendly forum that does not understand crypto
• Expensive and difficult (requires expert witness to interpret smart
contract)
USE CASES: FINANCIAL SERVICES
$468 Billion Market Size in securities class
action litigation alone in 2016
• 44% of lawsuits were for securities laws violations
• Settlement and recession will need to be handled manually. It’s
difficult to code into the smart contract.
USE CASES: SUPPLY CHAIN, LOGISTICS, TRANSPORTATION
$450-750 Billion dispute market by 2023
“What you’re building is critical to our
ecosystem. It’ll give vendors confidence about
coming onto the blockchain.”
USE CASES: CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
Size of construction dispute market in 2003: $5 Billion
“[T]he construction industry…[is] really the
industry that sponsors our work.”
Mark Appel, senior vice president of the American Arbitration Association (ENR 2000)
We want to hear what’s not working
Telegram: sagecoinnetwork

The Challenges of Smart Contracts

  • 1.
  • 2.
    smart contracts arevulnerable and do not provide transactional confidence
  • 3.
    In 2017, 1.13METH (now roughly over 1 billion dollars) was lost in smart contracts. And hard forks to make these incidents “right” means the blockchain chooses winners and losers -Reddit post responding to the DAO 2016 hack which caused Ethereum to hard fork
  • 5.
    Result: Increased transactionalconfidence in smart contracts
  • 6.
    TRADITIONAL LEGAL ISUNABLE TO RESOLVE SMART CONTRACT DISPUTES • Logistically difficult to file a complaint due to lack of identity of contracting party (there is no one to name in the complaint or serve papers to) • Traditional legal system lacks technical capability of enforcing any judgment • Ability to manually administer enforcement/collections requires that smart contract be architected to allow for it (via our SDK) • Unfriendly forum that does not understand crypto • Expensive and difficult (requires expert witness to interpret smart contract)
  • 7.
    USE CASES: FINANCIALSERVICES $468 Billion Market Size in securities class action litigation alone in 2016 • 44% of lawsuits were for securities laws violations • Settlement and recession will need to be handled manually. It’s difficult to code into the smart contract.
  • 8.
    USE CASES: SUPPLYCHAIN, LOGISTICS, TRANSPORTATION $450-750 Billion dispute market by 2023 “What you’re building is critical to our ecosystem. It’ll give vendors confidence about coming onto the blockchain.”
  • 9.
    USE CASES: CONSTRUCTIONFUNDING Size of construction dispute market in 2003: $5 Billion “[T]he construction industry…[is] really the industry that sponsors our work.” Mark Appel, senior vice president of the American Arbitration Association (ENR 2000)
  • 10.
    We want tohear what’s not working Telegram: sagecoinnetwork