Team Building in Sydney: What Managers Can Learn from Google with Beyond the Boardroom

•Download as PPTX, PDF•

0 likes•243 views

the key to building a great team is giving your workers the freedom to speak out and letting them know that they are an important part of your organisation.

Sports

Team Building in Sydney
What Managers Can
Learn from Google

No one can argue how amazing
Google’s growth and development
for the last 20 years is. Starting from
a simple research project by Larry
Page and Sergey Brin in 1996, the
tech company has grown to become
one of the biggest and most well-
known brands in the world today.

This can be attributed in part to
Google’s knack for bringing creative
and innovative minds together. As
such, if you’re planning to
some team building in Sydney, it
would do you well to follow Google’s
example.

Like most companies, Google held
on to traditional beliefs about
building a team such as it’s best to
put people with similar
personalities together or a team will
produce better results if they are
friends outside of work.

However, it turns out that these
beliefs, according to Google’s
People Analytics manager
Abeer Dubey, are not really set
on stone.

n 2012, the tech giant launched an
initiative code-named Project
Aristotle to study hundreds of
Google’s teams and understand why
some of them are successful while
some are not.

Dubey gathered some of the
company’s best statisticians,
organisational psychologists,
sociologists and engineers for
this project.

What the research team found is
quite different from what they
have expected. According to
Dubey, there is no exact formula
for creating the best team. “

We had lots of data, but there was
nothing showing that a mix of
specific personality types or skills
or backgrounds made any
difference. The ‘who’ part of the
equation didn’t seem to matter,”
he said.

For instance, after studying 180
teams from all over the
company, Project Aristotle
discovered that some of
Google’s most effective teams
were composed of people who
are close friends in and outside
of work.

There are also well-performing
groups who are made up of people
who are basically strangers to each
other. Some have strong mangers,
while others have a less
hierarchical structure.

What’s most surprising of all is that
the researchers found teams with
nearly identical make-ups and
overlapping memberships, but these
teams couldn’t be more different
from each other as far as their
performance and effectiveness is
concerned.

Dubey said folks at Google are
known for being good at finding
patterns, but he and his team were
unable to find strong patterns.

However, Project Aristotle did
find something that contributes
to a team’s effectiveness: group
norms. Group norms, according
to the researchers, are basically
the traditions, behavioural
standards, and unwritten

rules that govern how people
function when they are together.
They said that understanding and
influencing group norms may be the
key to improving Google’s teams.

One of the most important group
norms is the ability to feel
“psychologically safe.” Project
Aristotle has discovered that a
team is more effective when its
members are allowed to share

the things that scare or bother
them without fear of
recriminations. They also
perform better when they know
that their work is valued.

Indeed, organising a Sydney
Amazing Race for your
employees is well and good.
However, what you can learn
from Google is that apart from
helping them develop good
relationships with other,

the key to building a great team is
giving your workers the freedom
to speak out and letting them
know that they are an important
part of your organisation.

For more details
Visit us @
http://www.beyondtheboardroom.com.au/
Or Call us
1800 786 386
Us Today!

The document discusses differing interpretations of Aristotle's philosophical method based on a passage from the Nicomachean Ethics. Some scholars argue it shows Aristotle employed an "endoxic method" that accorded special weight to common opinions ("endoxa"). However, others criticize this view, noting Aristotle did not always consider endoxa. The paper proposes resolving this by examining Aristotle's comments in the Rhetoric linking the commonly believed and the true. It argues Aristotle aimed to preserve appearances not for epistemic reasons but because commonly held beliefs tend to be true, making it a methodologically effective approach. The paper aims to support a view of Aristotle's methodology intermediate between the "endoxic method" thesis and its critics.

What makes a team “collectively intelligent”?

Neela Bettridge Ltd

Back in 2012, Google established Project Aristotle. The idea was to study hundreds of the company’s different teams with a view to understanding why some of them were highly successful and others failed. But whatever aspect of a team’s composition the project’s researchers considered – personality types, social interactions, technical expertise – they struggled to find any pattern, any kind of ingredient X that correlated with the success of a particular team. That was until they made a connection with research that had been undertaken into the idea of ‘psychological safety ‘ and the work by a group of psychologists from Carnegie Mellon, M.I.T. and Union College on the concept of ‘collective intelligence’. Put simply, the term ‘psychological safety ‘ refers to a group culture within which individual team members feel confident that any contribution they make will be considered seriously, that they won’t suffer adverse consequences for speaking up. And, as further research has indicated, this psychological safety culture has the effect of raising a team’s collective intelligence to the point where it can outperform those teams whose members have the highest individual IQs. For the members of Project Aristotle, this was the key to making sense of their findings. Whilst, on the face of it, neither successful teams nor failing teams appeared to have any definable characteristics, in fact they did. The prevalence, or otherwise, of a psychological safety culture and a consequent higher collective intelligence. In short, teams that exhibit high levels of mutual empathy and foster equality of contribution – regardless of what other characteristics they might exhibit – perform better.

Work is not a Dare: Tips for Building Inclusive Teams

Shawn Rider

This document discusses building inclusive teams and moving away from dare-based, competitive work environments. It advocates for focusing on how teams work rather than just who is on them. Key aspects of effective teams include psychological safety through open communication, mutual respect, empathy and avoiding cults of personality. Teams should establish clear expectations, normalize documentation and support, and recognize that all team members will occasionally need a second chance. The overall message is that supportive behaviors can improve team performance more than a focus on individuals or competition.

Secrets to a Great Team

Elodie A.

Google%20case%20

hawwa123

This document analyzes the organizational culture and leadership at Google. It discusses how Google created a fun work environment with recreational activities and flexibility. This culture contributed to employee satisfaction and collaboration between teams. Google also emphasized open communication, employee autonomy, and an informal leadership structure. This helped drive innovation and kept the founding principles intact as the company grew. While Google's culture has been successful, the document notes they could improve by considering emotional intelligence in hiring and developing cultural skills.

Corporate Culture

CHLOE WELSBY

This document discusses corporate culture, specifically focusing on Google's culture. It begins by introducing the topic of corporate culture and how it can impact an organization. It then examines Google's unique culture as seen in an internship film, noting benefits like relaxation rooms, nap pods, and free breakfast that help attract and retain employees. Google prioritizes hiring "Googley" people and creating a pleasant work environment. The document asks questions about the strengths and weaknesses of Google's culture and relates it to other corporate cultures. It also analyzes Google's culture using Edgar Schein's three levels of culture and Charles Handy's model of organizational culture. Finally, it examines Google using Johnson and Scholes' cultural web framework.

Organization culture of google

Kriace Ward

This document provides an analysis of organizational culture through reviewing definitions from various researchers. It defines organizational culture as the shared assumptions, values, beliefs, and behaviors that bind members of an organization together. Researchers like Freytag and Grunig define culture as the totality of shared symbols, meanings, and expectations that organize people working together. A pioneering researcher, Schein, defines culture as a pattern of basic assumptions learned by a group in solving problems, which are then taught to new members. The document analyzes Google's unique culture which emphasizes putting users first, treating employees well, encouraging innovation, and making decisions through team-based consensus.

Management Excellence - Google

Stacey Troup

Google started in 1998 and has since grown into a global technology leader known for its innovative culture and commitment to employees. It employs over 40,000 people across over 40 countries. Google prioritizes investing in employees through benefits like free meals, transportation, and work environments designed for collaboration. This focus on culture and employee happiness has helped Google become a top employer and innovator in technology.

This a two-part report carrying out an analysis of innovation development in Google Inc USA, and the evaluation of the forecasting method at Ford. In the innovation development and analysis, the creativity and innovation of the firm is analyzed along with the implications introduced by means of organization structure, culture, and change management. As with any impediments to processes, the innovation management of company would also have faced some challenges and these challenges are then discussed in context.

Leading Strategic Decision Google Case Study

Nicolas Frangos

Google takes an unusual approach to strategic decision making that is bottom-up and experimental. They encourage small autonomous teams where employees spend 20% of their time on self-initiated projects, fostering innovation. This has helped Google rapidly expand into new information domains. While this culture has driven Google's success, it may lack sufficient planning. Some reports indicate engineers spend more like 30% of their time on personal projects rather than the intended 20%, suggesting the approach could benefit from more oversight. Overall, Google's model takes advantage of employee creativity but may struggle to scale if not balanced with more formal strategic processes.

Executive Summary

Darnelle Hummel

Google was founded in 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin as a college project called BackRub, with the goal of creating a search engine where anything could be found. The group project analyzed how Google handles human resources functions like recruiting, hiring, firing and evaluations. A human resources manager at Google focuses on human resources (35% of time), project management (30% of time), and employee relations (35% of time). Google makes hiring and working there appealing through benefits like internships, competitive pay, flexibility like the 80/20 rule, and insurance benefits. It generally takes 8 weeks to hire someone, which is average.

Project oxygen yakhin_roman

Roman Yakhin

Project Oxygen was a study conducted by Google to determine if managers matter and what traits effective managers have. They analyzed performance reviews and surveys of managers to identify behaviors of top-scoring managers. These included being a coach, empowering their team, showing interest in employees' lives, having clear goals and communication. The study found managers do matter and improved management training based on the 8 identified behaviors. Implementation of the findings led to higher survey scores and retention. The project demonstrated the importance of management and informed other companies' HR practices.

Google slideshare 2

Karen Bohez

Google was founded in 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin. They created a strong company culture focused on employee empowerment, autonomy, and fun. Google's culture is characterized by its values of openness and innovation. It encourages employees to spend 20% of their time working on passion projects. The company also emphasizes strong relationships with customers and a hands-on, value-driven approach to work. Google's culture of flexibility and collaboration has supported its continued success in the technology industry.

17095290 emerald vir za google

KatjaSlovenia

'Googlers' ranked culture and the strength of Google's people as the most important factors for innovation, with shared values and priorities being crucial. After culture, the quality of Google's leaders was seen as the next most important influence, with leaders empowering employees and removing obstacles to innovation. Google also credits its semi-structured organization, performance incentives, and focus on continuous learning as important 'hygiene factors' that support innovative behavior.

Keeping google googlely rev01

Ahmed Muthanna

Google was founded in 1996 by Sergey Brin and Larry Page. Their mission was to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible. Some key aspects that contributed to Google's success include developing a high-quality search algorithm, establishing partnerships with websites, having the right products like AdWords and AdSense, and quickly expanding their services. Google also utilized a mesh organizational structure with shared responsibility and consensus-based decision making. As the company expanded globally, it listened to users and operated as a market-based company. Google's culture emphasized innovation, filtering candidates who fit the culture, and providing training.

Google and culture

Amtheyst Floyd

Google believes in a culture of transparency, open communication, and psychological safety for its employees. Engineers have access to all code from day one and goals are clearly communicated. Google also values diversity in backgrounds among its employees. It aims to create an environment where all employees feel comfortable contributing ideas without fear of repercussions. The company addresses problems directly between employees involved rather than indirectly. Google's open office space and communal activities are designed to stimulate employees and encourage interaction.

The socialization process in google

Amtheyst Floyd

Google has an extensive socialization process for new employees that includes anticipating the interview experience, multiple interviews, and ongoing observation and feedback after being hired. They aim to create a collaborative environment with strong relationships between employees and management. However, high-performing young employees often only stay about two years on average before leaving for higher pay or starting their own companies. While Google provides many perks like generous benefits, some criticize that the environment does not change employees' tendencies to depart after a short tenure despite efforts to build loyalty.

positives and negatives of Google

kaneica

1) Google was founded in 1998 and is an American multinational corporation that specializes in internet services like search engines, software, online advertising and cloud computing. 2) Google's culture values openness, equality, creativity and flexibility as demonstrated through its informal workspaces of cubicles and meeting rooms. It also stresses not being evil and encourages employees to be inspired and grow. 3) Google aims to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible in order to achieve its mission. It incorporates these values in its workplace by enabling employees to share ideas freely and work flexibly.

FinalPatch_REVISED

Andreina Montes

The document is the final team paper for a management class prepared by a group on Google Inc. It contains 3 sections analyzing different aspects of Google: 1) Planning - It discusses Google's mission statement, stakeholders, and use of personal user information which raises ethical concerns. 2) Leadership - It analyzes Google CEO Larry Page's transformational leadership style and democratic decision-making. 3) Controlling/HR Management - It discusses how Google uses rapid prototyping to learn from failures, its focus on advertising technology, and its unique strategic HR model that aims to attract and retain top talent. The document also includes a group reflection on collaborating effectively and improving their teamwork over the course of

1Google Organizational Culture, and its Free Amenities .docx

hyacinthshackley2629

1 Google Organizational Culture, and its Free Amenities Google Organizational Culture, and its Free Amenities Elif Sam DR. Martin Jackson BUS 302 Management Concepts November 2, 2015 Google is an international, publicly traded entity which has the largest and most popular search engines worldwide. Apart from search engine, Google has other ventures like advertising technologies; cloud computing, web app, operating system development and internet analytics (Pride & Ferrell, 2014). Google history dates back to 1995, when two masters’ students; Larry Page and Sergey Brin met at Stanford University. The two partnered in a study project which eventually became the famous Google search engine. Before its inception, some CEO who was approached by the two students was reluctant to adopt the idea, but later the project was accepted and began its operation. Google semblance to the word googol; which means a number comprising of a numeral one followed by a hundred zeroes, made it more acceptable. Google mission statement is “to categorize the world’s information and make it unanimously reachable and helpful.” Google business model is advertisements (Pride & Ferrell, 2014); latest study report revealed that about 96% of Google’s income comes from profitable search engine advertising. Google being the most popular internet service provider in the globe, it is unbelievable that it earns nothing from web browsing, as it offers these services to its users for free. Google makes its revenue from the proceeds got in advertising for advertisers who are targeting the online users. Google facilitate them to create text-based Ads by us of Google Adwords – which is a personalized serve auction advertising plan.When the user clicks these Ads, the advertisers pay Google. Google attracts and employs types of people who are innovative, team workers, leaders, creative and intelligent people. Anyone can qualify to work at Google, as long as they have a degree. Google human resource department says that they do not consider the GPA of the student so as to hire them as an employee. But they consider the ability of the potential employer to make quick decisions; also they test the interviewees on their capability to deal with the challenging issues of life when they befall them. The culture of the business at Google is the one which promotes innovation and a healthy discount for impossible (Levy, 2011). Google has brought together a team of talented and elegant people from different origins that merge their skills and knowledge hence making Google a number one leading internet service provider in the world. The following qualities are used to define a leader in Google; a leader is a person, who is a good coach, a leader has ability to endorse their squad and do not micromanage. A leader at Google is a person who expresses goodwill in the success of the teammates and their welfare. A leader is industrious and goal oriented, also he or she is a good listener an.

BUSINESS DAYGoogle’s Quest to Build a Better BossBy ADAM.docx

felicidaddinwoodie

BUSINESS DAY Google’s Quest to Build a Better Boss By ADAM BRYANT MARCH 12, 2011 Mountain View, Calif. IN early 2009, statisticians inside the Googleplex here embarked on a plan code-named Project Oxygen. Their mission was to devise something far more important to the future of Google Inc. than its next search algorithm or app. They wanted to build better bosses. So, as only a data-mining giant like Google can do, it began analyzing performance reviews, feedback surveys and nominations for top-manager awards. They correlated phrases, words, praise and complaints. Later that year, the “people analytics” teams at the company produced what might be called the Eight Habits of Highly Effective Google Managers. Now, brace yourself. Because the directives might seem so forehead-slappingly obvious — so, well, duh — it’s hard to believe that it took the mighty Google so long to figure them out: “Have a clear vision and strategy for the team.” “Help your employees with career development.” “Don’t be a sissy: Be productive and results-oriented.” The list goes on, reading like a whiteboard gag from an episode of “The Office.” http://www.nytimes.com/ http://www.nytimes.com/pages/business/index.html http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/adam_bryant/index.html http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/google_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org “My first reaction was, that’s it?” says Laszlo Bock, Google’s vice president for “people operations,” which is Googlespeak for human resources. But then, Mr. Bock and his team began ranking those eight directives by importance. And this is where Project Oxygen gets interesting. For much of its 13-year history, particularly the early years, Google has taken a pretty simple approach to management: Leave people alone. Let the engineers do their stuff. If they become stuck, they’ll ask their bosses, whose deep technical expertise propelled them into management in the first place. But Mr. Bock’s group found that technical expertise — the ability, say, to write computer code in your sleep — ranked dead last among Google’s big eight. What employees valued most were even-keeled bosses who made time for one-on-one meetings, who helped people puzzle through problems by asking questions, not dictating answers, and who took an interest in employees’ lives and careers. “In the Google context, we’d always believed that to be a manager, particularly on the engineering side, you need to be as deep or deeper a technical expert than the people who work for you,” Mr. Bock says. “It turns out that that’s absolutely the least important thing. It’s important, but pales in comparison. Much more important is just making that connection and being accessible.” Project Oxygen doesn’t fit neatly into the usual Google story line of hits (like its search engine) and misses (like the start last year of Buzz, its stab at social networking). Management is much squishier to analyze, after all, and the .

Slide share google

kszabo1

The document discusses Google's management style and how it fits the human resources approach. It notes that Google focuses on employee needs like childcare and fitness facilities to allow them to focus on work. Leadership aims to be consistent, fair, and set a clear vision. Google also values all employee contributions and ideas. Education is less emphasized in hiring to allow people from various backgrounds. Communication flows openly across levels through forums like Google Moderator and Cafe. This participative style aims to motivate employees by satisfying various needs.

Running head GOOGLE MANAGMENT1GOOGLE MANAGMENT8GOOGLE M.docx

jeanettehully

Running head: GOOGLE MANAGMENT 1 GOOGLE MANAGMENT 8 GOOGLE MANAGEMENT Author Name(s), First M. Last, Omit Titles and Degrees Institutional Affiliation(s) Table of Contents Introduction to the company3 Who founded Google?4 How is Google funded?4 History of Company4 What impact has the brand had within its category?5 How have you differentiated yourself from your competitors?5 Mission of company5 Best practice6 Best practice into concepts8 It gives value to work8 Optimize efforts through analytical tools8 How could another organization adopt this best practice?9 Boosts flexibility at work10 Conclusion10 Introduction to the company Google LLC is a US international technology organization that focusses on Internet-related products and services, which contain search engines, online marketing technologies, cloud computing, hardware, and software. The purpose of Google management is to organize all the information in the world and create it nearby and beneficial to everyone (Shane, & Wakabayashi, 2018). The company Google was born as a search engine for more information on the web. Its main characteristic with respect to its competitors was its advanced system of analysis of relations between pages, which allowed a higher ranking or ranking. Google's next step was to use this information to introduce advertising and manipulate the ranking based on the payment for such advertising. The enormous benefits that the company achieves are reinvested in new services and new policies that have strengthened the individual-segmentation relationship, reaching perfect segmentation (Mingers, & Lipitakis, 2010). Google is an American multinational company focusing on products and services linked to the Internet, electronic devices, software and other expertise. Google's key product is the Internet content search engine of the similar name, although it also provides other services such as an email service called Gmail, its Google Earth map and Google Maps service, the YouTube video website, others Web values such as Google News or Google Books, the Google Chrome web browser, the Google+ social network. It provides an easy and quick way to find info on the web, by access to a catalogue of over 8,168 million web pages. As said by the Google company, currently replies to above 200 million queries a day (Verma, et.al. 2015, April). Who founded Google? The American of Larry Page and the Russian Sergey Brin , are the founders of this magnificent company. In 1995, Page had finished his studies at the University of Michigan and went to do his graduate degree at Stanford University, California. In this same university he meets Brin, 21, who was in charge of teaching him the campus (Verma, et.al. 2015, April).How is Google funded? Faced with the great and rapid growth, in the year 2000, Google develops what today gives them the highest proportion of their profits: Google Adwords. Which is a Digital Marketing strategy that is based on making money throu ...

MKT531 Corporate Branding Gavin Teggart

Gavin Teggart

The document discusses Google's corporate culture and the three core values that underpin it: trust, transparency, and inclusion. It explores how Google's founders Larry Page and Sergy Brin cultivated this culture through their transformational leadership approach and the creation of the Googleplex campus, which was designed to embody and promote the values of trust, transparency, and inclusion through its unconventional work spaces and emphasis on social interaction between employees. The document argues that these three values have been intentionally developed and reinforced in Google's culture, leadership model, employee engagement strategies, and physical work environment to create a highly productive and innovative workplace.

Punya nabila

nabilaputri98

Google organizes its engineers into small autonomous teams to foster innovation. Each technical employee must spend 20% of their time working on new projects of their choice, rather than just working within their normal roles. This time is used to develop many of Google's new products and features. While Google is a large company, it aims to maintain the feel of a small startup by allowing engineers flexibility in their work and avoiding a strict hierarchy or divisional structure that limits collaboration.

ORGANIZING FOR iNNOVATION AT GOOGLE

Badra Khairiah

Google was founded in 1998 by two Stanford Ph.D. students who developed a powerful search engine algorithm. The search engine rapidly grew in popularity and enabled Google to sell targeted advertising. Under CEO Eric Schmidt, Google pursued an ambitious mission to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible. Despite massive growth, Google maintained a small company culture through flat management structures, shared workspaces, and by encouraging engineers to spend 20% of their time on innovative projects of their choosing. This unconventional approach helped foster collaboration and drive innovation within the company.

Organizing for i nnovation at google

Badra Khairiah

5.1 PRD- A report on People Resourcing of Google (Individual)

Shilabrata Karmakar

1. The document discusses Google's human resource management practices related to performance management, people resourcing, and development. It covers Google's organizational structure, recruitment and selection processes, training programs, and performance management. 2. Google forecasts human resource needs through trend and scenario analysis to balance supply and demand. It uses a matrix structure and recruits both internally and externally, focusing on creativity, smartness, and excellence rather than experience. 3. Google provides competitive compensation and benefits to attract and retain top talent. It implements various training programs and performance management to maximize employee capabilities.

Team Building Sydney: The Ways to Ensure your Success

Team Building in Sydney: What Managers Can Learn from Google with Beyond the Boardroom

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Team Building in Sydney: What Managers Can Learn from Google with Beyond the Boardroom

Similar to Team Building in Sydney: What Managers Can Learn from Google with Beyond the Boardroom (20)

More from steve dalton

More from steve dalton (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Team Building in Sydney: What Managers Can Learn from Google with Beyond the Boardroom