SUNYLA 2007 Expanding Our Horizons: Reaching for the Limits June 14, 2007 Matt Goldner  Executive Director, End User Services OCLC, Online Computer Library Ctr
Current position of libraries in information services OCLC strategy WorldCat.org program WorldCat Local
Background
Realities of information discovery From OCLC’s  Perceptions of Libraries  and Information Resources  report: 93% — Agree Google provides worthwhile information 85% — agree Yahoo provides worthwhile information 78% — agree library Web sites provide worthwhile information 69% — feel libraries and search engines provide the same level of trustworthiness
The good Libraries used and viewed favorably 96% of respondents said that they have visited a library 57% use libraries frequently 69% say library use is steady or high
The good What students value: Authoritative content Research assistance The library as place
The not so good Libraries are about books and information First think of books Majority believe mission is information Majority do NOT consider library a source for readily available information, especially digital content
From OCLC:  Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources (2005) The Real Issue  Q:  Where do you typically begin your search for  information on a particular topic? 84% Search Engines 2% Library Portals
Then:  the user built their  workflow around the library Now:  the library must build its service  around the user workflow
Then:  resources were scarce and attention  was abundant Now:  attention is scarce and resources are abundant
Have seen the problem What do we do about it as a community?
. . . ideas . .  Move our services to where users are  In GYM In other major information websites In other campus and community systems
… ideas … 2.  Move processes up to cooperative level  Places library where aggregated demand is Frees libraries to concentrate on what is best done locally
… ideas … 3.  Avoid duplicative efforts Ties back to moving processes to the cooperative Exploits local skills for local needs
… ideas … 4.  Think in Web 2.0 framework Service-oriented Expose data Collaboration Perpetual beta
Vision: Aggregate services around the user Discover  Get it  Create, manage, share
Goal Deliver the  full capacity  of the library community to the user, at the point of need collections services community, expertise, place
A view of library services Remix/reuse services in other environments Connect users/consumers to libraries at the global level Services for libraries to manage collections and services efficiently N ETWORK  I NTERFACE   S ERVICES C ONSUMER  S ERVICES M ANAGEMENT  S ERVICES
Open WorldCat Program N ETWORK  I NTERFACE   S ERVICES
N ETWORK  I NTERFACE   S ERVICES
N ETWORK  I NTERFACE   S ERVICES
N ETWORK  I NTERFACE   S ERVICES
Currently supported services Discovery Fulfillment Social networking C ONSUMER  S ERVICES
A few examples of discovery services North Carolina State – Endeca  Rochester Institute of Technology – eXtensible Catalog Ex Libris – Primo  III – Encore  OCLC – worldcat.org
WorldCat.org
WorldCat.org – Discovery
WorldCat.org – Detailed record
  Local libraries displayed automatically
Stats: are we on the right track? Impressions Click throughs Conversions
Click-throughs to WorldCat.org pages
 
WorldCat Local Customized view of WorldCat.org that can serve as a library or library consortium’s local discovery service WorldCat.org 3.0 An add-on that allows users to search all licensed databases in the library’s collection  Global Discovery brought to Local Services
Components of WorldCat Local Content Branded version of WorldCat.org Interoperability with local delivery environment
Content OCLC supplied content All of WorldCat (including “shared collections”) All article metadata in WorldCat.org All evaluative content in WorldCat on FS Vendor records
Content indexed from local collections  Physical collections Electronic journals Article-level citations Special collections Digitized collections collections WorldCat.org
Integration with Local Delivery Environment Circulation Request/Place Hold via Circulation or Intra-consortial borrowing system ILL Interoperability with OCLC ILL, ILLiad, VDX Online full-text Direct access to FS, ECO, NetLibrary Linking to OpenURL Resolver
Customized view of WorldCat.org
Holdings:  Local, Group, Global UW First Then Summit Rest of WorldCat
Full record display
Request
Access to Online Full Text (via resolver) Link displays based on e-serials holdings Displays article from FS/ECO, if available If not, links to resolver
What makes WorldCat Local Unique? Shared-platform approach Access to the global network  Syndication across the network
Second key factor Erases barriers between delivery silos Works to intelligently present the “best” silo  Doesn’t preclude other delivery options
Open Access Electronic Immediate delivery Time delay delivery Licensed Electronic Locally Held Group Held Globally Held
WorldCat Local Pilot and Release Pilot began in April 2007 Pilot participants University of Washington Peninsula Library System (36 libraries) State of Illinois (9 libraries) Ohio State University University of California Service release planned for late 2007
Social Network Services Services that support user workflow and connect users with common interests
 
 
 
Further information Matt Goldner [email_address]   Bob Schulz – WorldCat.org [email_address] Mindy Pozenel – WorldCat Local [email_address]   Jasmine De Gaia – Social Network [email_address]

SUNYLA 2007 Keynote

  • 1.
    SUNYLA 2007 ExpandingOur Horizons: Reaching for the Limits June 14, 2007 Matt Goldner Executive Director, End User Services OCLC, Online Computer Library Ctr
  • 2.
    Current position oflibraries in information services OCLC strategy WorldCat.org program WorldCat Local
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Realities of informationdiscovery From OCLC’s Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources report: 93% — Agree Google provides worthwhile information 85% — agree Yahoo provides worthwhile information 78% — agree library Web sites provide worthwhile information 69% — feel libraries and search engines provide the same level of trustworthiness
  • 5.
    The good Librariesused and viewed favorably 96% of respondents said that they have visited a library 57% use libraries frequently 69% say library use is steady or high
  • 6.
    The good Whatstudents value: Authoritative content Research assistance The library as place
  • 7.
    The not sogood Libraries are about books and information First think of books Majority believe mission is information Majority do NOT consider library a source for readily available information, especially digital content
  • 8.
    From OCLC: Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources (2005) The Real Issue Q: Where do you typically begin your search for information on a particular topic? 84% Search Engines 2% Library Portals
  • 9.
    Then: theuser built their workflow around the library Now: the library must build its service around the user workflow
  • 10.
    Then: resourceswere scarce and attention was abundant Now: attention is scarce and resources are abundant
  • 11.
    Have seen theproblem What do we do about it as a community?
  • 12.
    . . .ideas . . Move our services to where users are In GYM In other major information websites In other campus and community systems
  • 13.
    … ideas …2. Move processes up to cooperative level Places library where aggregated demand is Frees libraries to concentrate on what is best done locally
  • 14.
    … ideas …3. Avoid duplicative efforts Ties back to moving processes to the cooperative Exploits local skills for local needs
  • 15.
    … ideas …4. Think in Web 2.0 framework Service-oriented Expose data Collaboration Perpetual beta
  • 16.
    Vision: Aggregate servicesaround the user Discover Get it Create, manage, share
  • 17.
    Goal Deliver the full capacity of the library community to the user, at the point of need collections services community, expertise, place
  • 18.
    A view oflibrary services Remix/reuse services in other environments Connect users/consumers to libraries at the global level Services for libraries to manage collections and services efficiently N ETWORK I NTERFACE S ERVICES C ONSUMER S ERVICES M ANAGEMENT S ERVICES
  • 19.
    Open WorldCat ProgramN ETWORK I NTERFACE S ERVICES
  • 20.
    N ETWORK I NTERFACE S ERVICES
  • 21.
    N ETWORK I NTERFACE S ERVICES
  • 22.
    N ETWORK I NTERFACE S ERVICES
  • 23.
    Currently supported servicesDiscovery Fulfillment Social networking C ONSUMER S ERVICES
  • 24.
    A few examplesof discovery services North Carolina State – Endeca Rochester Institute of Technology – eXtensible Catalog Ex Libris – Primo III – Encore OCLC – worldcat.org
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
    Locallibraries displayed automatically
  • 29.
    Stats: are weon the right track? Impressions Click throughs Conversions
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
    WorldCat Local Customizedview of WorldCat.org that can serve as a library or library consortium’s local discovery service WorldCat.org 3.0 An add-on that allows users to search all licensed databases in the library’s collection Global Discovery brought to Local Services
  • 33.
    Components of WorldCatLocal Content Branded version of WorldCat.org Interoperability with local delivery environment
  • 34.
    Content OCLC suppliedcontent All of WorldCat (including “shared collections”) All article metadata in WorldCat.org All evaluative content in WorldCat on FS Vendor records
  • 35.
    Content indexed fromlocal collections Physical collections Electronic journals Article-level citations Special collections Digitized collections collections WorldCat.org
  • 36.
    Integration with LocalDelivery Environment Circulation Request/Place Hold via Circulation or Intra-consortial borrowing system ILL Interoperability with OCLC ILL, ILLiad, VDX Online full-text Direct access to FS, ECO, NetLibrary Linking to OpenURL Resolver
  • 37.
    Customized view ofWorldCat.org
  • 38.
    Holdings: Local,Group, Global UW First Then Summit Rest of WorldCat
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
    Access to OnlineFull Text (via resolver) Link displays based on e-serials holdings Displays article from FS/ECO, if available If not, links to resolver
  • 42.
    What makes WorldCatLocal Unique? Shared-platform approach Access to the global network Syndication across the network
  • 43.
    Second key factorErases barriers between delivery silos Works to intelligently present the “best” silo Doesn’t preclude other delivery options
  • 44.
    Open Access ElectronicImmediate delivery Time delay delivery Licensed Electronic Locally Held Group Held Globally Held
  • 45.
    WorldCat Local Pilotand Release Pilot began in April 2007 Pilot participants University of Washington Peninsula Library System (36 libraries) State of Illinois (9 libraries) Ohio State University University of California Service release planned for late 2007
  • 46.
    Social Network ServicesServices that support user workflow and connect users with common interests
  • 47.
  • 48.
  • 49.
  • 50.
    Further information MattGoldner [email_address] Bob Schulz – WorldCat.org [email_address] Mindy Pozenel – WorldCat Local [email_address] Jasmine De Gaia – Social Network [email_address]