SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
STUDIES ON MICROBIAL INOCULATION IN THE PREPARATION OF PHOSPHO-COMPOST USING
                              FOREST LEAF LITTER
                K. S. Usha1, A. N. Balakrishna1, D. N. Padma1, M. Raghavendrakumar1, N.G. Kumar2, P. Nirmala2
                                                   and B.V. Chinnappa Reddy3
                         1. Department of Agricultural Microbiology; 2. Department of Agricultural Entomology; 3. Department of Agricultural Economics
                                                                 University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK Campus,
                                                                          Bangalore-560065, Karnataka, India


     INTRODUCTION                                                                                                                                        42.2
                                                                                                                45                                                     40                                                                                                           3.5                                                                                                              3.19
                                                                                                                                                                              37.4               38.4
                                                                                                                40
  The value of organic wastes as soil conditioner has been the subject of                                                                                                                                 33                                                                                                    3
                                                                                                                35                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         2.45




                                                                                 Organic-C (%)
 considerable debate. The simplest and most common method of                                                                                                       39.9                                                                                                             2.5
                                                                                                                30                                                                                                 26.3                  30                                                                                                            2.11                                       2.42




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Total N (%)
 estimating the value of organic wastes is to convert the wastes to useful                                      25                                                                                  32.2                                 60                                                                     2                          1.66                                  1.59
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    30
 compost as a substitute for commercial fertilizers. Further, microbial                                         20                                                                                                                                                                  1.5                                                           1.56                                                              60
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         90
 inoculation with efficient decomposing microbial cultures hastens the                                          15                                                                                                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   0.89                                                                             90
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Mean                                                                                                                                                                       Mean
 processes of decomposition and addition of rock phosphate enriches the                                         10                                                                                                                                                                  0.5
 compost with P.                                                                                                 5
                                                                                                                                                                            1                                                                                                                                   0
                                                                                                                 0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Control                                        Treated
                                                                                                                                                            Control                                  Treated
    MATERIAL AND METHODS                                                                                                                                                          Treatments
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Treatments




                                                                                                               2
   Treatment details: 1. Control 2. Inoculated with microbial consortium                                                                                                                                                       1.79
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               60
                                                                                                      1.8                                                                                                         1.64
   Microbial consortium: Trichurus spiralis, Trichoderma harzianum and                                1.6
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     49.3
                                                                                                                                                                                                     1.45                                                                                                      50
   Pleurotus sp.                                                                                      1.4




                                                                                      NH4-N (m g/g)
   Replications: 13 samples were drawn from each of the Vat and                                                                                                                                                                               30                                                               40                                                                                                         30




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               C:N ratio
                                                                                                      1.2
                                                                                                                                                                                                            1.63                              60
   analyzed separately. Design: CRD                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       60
                                                                                                               1                                                  0.84 0.87
                                                                                                                                                                      1                                                                                                                                        30                                25.5                                    25.4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              90                                                                                                                                                                          90
   Leaf litter: The leaf litter consisted of Roncilate sp. (125 kg)                                   0.8                                                0.63                                                                                                                                                                                                17.9
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Mean                                                             20                                                                                 13.2
   Strobilanthes sp. (100 kg), Lepisanthes descipens (25 kg) and Euginea                              0.6                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        30.9                                                                     Mean
                                                                                                                                                                       0.78
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             8.3
   jambolana (25 kg).                                                                                 0.4                                                                                                                                                                                                      10
                                                                                                      0.2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  15.6
   Cow Dung: Cow dung was added at 10% of the weight of the leaf litter                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   0                            1
                                                                                                               0
   used (25 kg).                                                                                                                                                Control                                     Treated
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Control                                            Treated
   Rock phosphate: Rock phosphate was added at 2% P2O5 of the weight                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Treatments
   of leaf litter.                                                                                                                                                                      Treatments

   Vats: The vats of size 6’ x 4’ x 3’ were made from locally available palm
   stems.
                                                                                                                     35                                                                                                   32.22




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           A v a i l a b l e P 2 O 5 (m g / g s o il )
                                                                                                                     30                                                                                                                                                                                                       2
                                                                                                                                                                                                             25.05                                                                                                                                                                                           1.6
                                                                                                                     25                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            1.4
                                                                                                      NO3-N (mg/g)




                                                                                                                                                                                                     21.22                                    30                                                                         1.5                                                                                             30
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    26.17                                                                                                                                                                1.16
                                                                                                                     20                                                                                                                       60                                                                                                                                                                         60
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              90                                                                              1                  0.74 0.74                                            1.43
                                                                                                                     15                                                           12.57                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  90
                                                                                                                                                           8.8          9.69                                                                  Mean
                                                                                                                     10                                                                                                                                                                                                  0.5          0.35                                                                               Mean
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      0.61
                                                                                                                     5                                                  10.36
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              0
                                                                                                                     0                                                        1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Control                                             Treated
                                                                                                                                                                  Control                                   Treated
                                                                                                                                                                                      Treatments
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Treatments
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         40

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         35                                                                        35.66
                                                                                                                                               3.5                                                                                3.09


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Abundance (#/400g sam ple)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         30
                                                                                                                                                     3
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    2.68                                                                                                                          28.16
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Collembola
                                                                                                                      T o t a l P ( g /K g s o il)




                                                                                                                                                                                                           2.24                                                                                                          25
                                                                                                                                               2.5                                                                                            30                                                                                                                                                                   Cryptostigmatids

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         20                                                      18.33                             Other Mites
                                                                                                                                                     2                                                                                        60
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  15.16                                                                            Other invertebrates
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              90                                                                         15
                                                                                                                                               1.5                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Total fauna
                                                                                                                                                                                      1.02                                                                                                                                                                                                9.58
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Mean                                                                       10
                                                                                                                                                     1                         0.68
                                                                                                                                                                             0.651                                       0.7                                                                                                              6.41
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             4.25                                          5.16
                                                                                                                                                                0.36                                                                                                                                                      5                       2.33                                             2.58
                                                                                                                                               0.5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          0
                                                                                                                                                     0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Control                                         Treated
                                                                                                                                                                            Control                                 Treated                                                                                                                                         Treatments

                                                                                                                                                                                             Treatments




                                                                                                                                                           CONCLUSION
                                                                                                                                        Inoculation of microbial cultures to forest leaf litter has significantly reduced the time
                                                                                                                                      required for decomposition of forest leaf litter.
          RESULTS
                                                                                                                                        A good compost of C/N ratio 13.2 could be obtained 30 days earlier compared to without
                                                                                                                                      inoculation.
   Inoculation of leaf litter with MIC has significantly reduced the organic-C
(32.2%) as compared to control (39.9%) over 90 days of decomposition.                                                                   The compost thus prepared was also high in nitrate-N, total-N and available-P. Such
   The total-N significantly increased by 90 days (2.42%) in the treatment                                                            improvement in the quality of compost is due to inoculation with microorganisms.
with MIC as compared to the control (1.56%).
                                                                                                                                       Further, enrichment with rock phosphate and microbial inoculation enhanced the available-P
   The C:N ratio was significantly reduced at all the intervals over the                                                              content in compost.
period of decomposition both in control as well as in treatment with
microbial consortium. However, the C: N ratio in the treatment with                                                                     This is due to solubilization of insoluble-P present in the rock phosphate during the process
microbial consortium was 13.2 as compared to the control (25.5) at 60 days                                                            of decomposition and this can replace the costlier super phosphate in sustainable agriculture.
of decomposition suggesting that a good compost could be obtained 30
days earlier.
                                                                                                                                                           ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
   Significantly higher soil faunal population was observed in leaf litter
with MIC+MRP treatment compared to control. Further, the populations of                                                                    The authors are grateful to TSBF-CIAT/GEF/UNEP for the financial support to carryout
Collembola, cryptostigamtids, other Acari and other invertebrates were                                                               the investigation.
higher in this treatment than control.

   Significantly higher rate of ammonification and nitrification due to
                                                                                                                                                                REFERENCES
microbial consortium was recorded at all periods of decomposition.                                                                    Leal, N., Canizalez, C.M-de. and de-Canizalez,C.M., 1998. Composting of organic residues
Significantly higher available-P2O5 and total- P2O5 contents in compost due                                                           mixed with rock phosphate. Agronomia Tropical Maracay, 48(3): 335-357.
to inoculation of MIC were recorded as compared to the control over a                                                                 Parr, J.F. and Hornick, S.B., 1992. Utilization of Municipal wastes. In: Soil Microbial Ecology.
period of 90 days decomposition.                                                                                                      (Ed. Blaine Metting, Jr). pp. 545-560.

More Related Content

More from CSM _BGBD biodiversity

The solution to global warming could be in the soil
The solution to global warming could be in the soilThe solution to global warming could be in the soil
The solution to global warming could be in the soilCSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Land use and community composition of arbusscular mycorrhizal fungi mabira fo...
Land use and community composition of arbusscular mycorrhizal fungi mabira fo...Land use and community composition of arbusscular mycorrhizal fungi mabira fo...
Land use and community composition of arbusscular mycorrhizal fungi mabira fo...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Changes in the diversity of assemblages of ground foraging ants in response t...
Changes in the diversity of assemblages of ground foraging ants in response t...Changes in the diversity of assemblages of ground foraging ants in response t...
Changes in the diversity of assemblages of ground foraging ants in response t...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Land use effects on litter decomposition in tropical ecosystems in mexico
Land use effects on litter decomposition in tropical ecosystems in mexicoLand use effects on litter decomposition in tropical ecosystems in mexico
Land use effects on litter decomposition in tropical ecosystems in mexicoCSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPOP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPCSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 

More from CSM _BGBD biodiversity (20)

The solution to global warming could be in the soil
The solution to global warming could be in the soilThe solution to global warming could be in the soil
The solution to global warming could be in the soil
 
Land use and community composition of arbusscular mycorrhizal fungi mabira fo...
Land use and community composition of arbusscular mycorrhizal fungi mabira fo...Land use and community composition of arbusscular mycorrhizal fungi mabira fo...
Land use and community composition of arbusscular mycorrhizal fungi mabira fo...
 
Changes in the diversity of assemblages of ground foraging ants in response t...
Changes in the diversity of assemblages of ground foraging ants in response t...Changes in the diversity of assemblages of ground foraging ants in response t...
Changes in the diversity of assemblages of ground foraging ants in response t...
 
Nematodes vc
Nematodes vcNematodes vc
Nematodes vc
 
Nematodes sf
Nematodes sfNematodes sf
Nematodes sf
 
Nematodes lm
Nematodes lmNematodes lm
Nematodes lm
 
Land use effects on litter decomposition in tropical ecosystems in mexico
Land use effects on litter decomposition in tropical ecosystems in mexicoLand use effects on litter decomposition in tropical ecosystems in mexico
Land use effects on litter decomposition in tropical ecosystems in mexico
 
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
 
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
 
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
 
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
 
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
 
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
 
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
 
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
 
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
 
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
 
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
 
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPOP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
 
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
 

Studies on microbial inoculation in the preparation of phospho compost using forest leaf litter

  • 1. STUDIES ON MICROBIAL INOCULATION IN THE PREPARATION OF PHOSPHO-COMPOST USING FOREST LEAF LITTER K. S. Usha1, A. N. Balakrishna1, D. N. Padma1, M. Raghavendrakumar1, N.G. Kumar2, P. Nirmala2 and B.V. Chinnappa Reddy3 1. Department of Agricultural Microbiology; 2. Department of Agricultural Entomology; 3. Department of Agricultural Economics University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK Campus, Bangalore-560065, Karnataka, India INTRODUCTION 42.2 45 40 3.5 3.19 37.4 38.4 40 The value of organic wastes as soil conditioner has been the subject of 33 3 35 2.45 Organic-C (%) considerable debate. The simplest and most common method of 39.9 2.5 30 26.3 30 2.11 2.42 Total N (%) estimating the value of organic wastes is to convert the wastes to useful 25 32.2 60 2 1.66 1.59 30 compost as a substitute for commercial fertilizers. Further, microbial 20 1.5 1.56 60 90 inoculation with efficient decomposing microbial cultures hastens the 15 1 0.89 90 Mean Mean processes of decomposition and addition of rock phosphate enriches the 10 0.5 compost with P. 5 1 0 0 Control Treated Control Treated MATERIAL AND METHODS Treatments Treatments 2 Treatment details: 1. Control 2. Inoculated with microbial consortium 1.79 60 1.8 1.64 Microbial consortium: Trichurus spiralis, Trichoderma harzianum and 1.6 49.3 1.45 50 Pleurotus sp. 1.4 NH4-N (m g/g) Replications: 13 samples were drawn from each of the Vat and 30 40 30 C:N ratio 1.2 1.63 60 analyzed separately. Design: CRD 60 1 0.84 0.87 1 30 25.5 25.4 90 90 Leaf litter: The leaf litter consisted of Roncilate sp. (125 kg) 0.8 0.63 17.9 Mean 20 13.2 Strobilanthes sp. (100 kg), Lepisanthes descipens (25 kg) and Euginea 0.6 30.9 Mean 0.78 8.3 jambolana (25 kg). 0.4 10 0.2 15.6 Cow Dung: Cow dung was added at 10% of the weight of the leaf litter 0 1 0 used (25 kg). Control Treated Control Treated Rock phosphate: Rock phosphate was added at 2% P2O5 of the weight Treatments of leaf litter. Treatments Vats: The vats of size 6’ x 4’ x 3’ were made from locally available palm stems. 35 32.22 A v a i l a b l e P 2 O 5 (m g / g s o il ) 30 2 25.05 1.6 25 1.4 NO3-N (mg/g) 21.22 30 1.5 30 26.17 1.16 20 60 60 90 1 0.74 0.74 1.43 15 12.57 90 8.8 9.69 Mean 10 0.5 0.35 Mean 0.61 5 10.36 0 0 1 Control Treated Control Treated Treatments Treatments 40 35 35.66 3.5 3.09 Abundance (#/400g sam ple) 30 3 2.68 28.16 Collembola T o t a l P ( g /K g s o il) 2.24 25 2.5 30 Cryptostigmatids 20 18.33 Other Mites 2 60 15.16 Other invertebrates 90 15 1.5 Total fauna 1.02 9.58 Mean 10 1 0.68 0.651 0.7 6.41 4.25 5.16 0.36 5 2.33 2.58 0.5 1 0 0 Control Treated Control Treated Treatments Treatments CONCLUSION Inoculation of microbial cultures to forest leaf litter has significantly reduced the time required for decomposition of forest leaf litter. RESULTS A good compost of C/N ratio 13.2 could be obtained 30 days earlier compared to without inoculation. Inoculation of leaf litter with MIC has significantly reduced the organic-C (32.2%) as compared to control (39.9%) over 90 days of decomposition. The compost thus prepared was also high in nitrate-N, total-N and available-P. Such The total-N significantly increased by 90 days (2.42%) in the treatment improvement in the quality of compost is due to inoculation with microorganisms. with MIC as compared to the control (1.56%). Further, enrichment with rock phosphate and microbial inoculation enhanced the available-P The C:N ratio was significantly reduced at all the intervals over the content in compost. period of decomposition both in control as well as in treatment with microbial consortium. However, the C: N ratio in the treatment with This is due to solubilization of insoluble-P present in the rock phosphate during the process microbial consortium was 13.2 as compared to the control (25.5) at 60 days of decomposition and this can replace the costlier super phosphate in sustainable agriculture. of decomposition suggesting that a good compost could be obtained 30 days earlier. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Significantly higher soil faunal population was observed in leaf litter with MIC+MRP treatment compared to control. Further, the populations of The authors are grateful to TSBF-CIAT/GEF/UNEP for the financial support to carryout Collembola, cryptostigamtids, other Acari and other invertebrates were the investigation. higher in this treatment than control. Significantly higher rate of ammonification and nitrification due to REFERENCES microbial consortium was recorded at all periods of decomposition. Leal, N., Canizalez, C.M-de. and de-Canizalez,C.M., 1998. Composting of organic residues Significantly higher available-P2O5 and total- P2O5 contents in compost due mixed with rock phosphate. Agronomia Tropical Maracay, 48(3): 335-357. to inoculation of MIC were recorded as compared to the control over a Parr, J.F. and Hornick, S.B., 1992. Utilization of Municipal wastes. In: Soil Microbial Ecology. period of 90 days decomposition. (Ed. Blaine Metting, Jr). pp. 545-560.