O documento discute um programa defeituoso de radioterapia chamado Therac-25 que causou a morte ou danos graves a pacientes entre 1985 e 1987 devido a falhas na programação que resultaram em grandes doses de radiação.
Aprendemos a mirar la obra de Julião Sarmento, despues de nuestra visita al Centro de Arte Contemporáneo de Málaga (CAC) y trasladamos nuestras impresiones a los trabajos realizados en el aula.
Aumentó la eficacia de la graduación en las universidades estatalesEduardo Nelson German
Entre 2003 y 2012, la graduación universitaria total en Argentina aumentó un 42,1%, liderado por las ciencias sociales cuya graduación aumentó un 50,1%. La graduación en universidades privadas se duplicó durante este período, mientras que la graduación estatal solo aumentó un 23,9%.
This short document contains photo credits for 5 different photographers - Christoph Zurbuchen, Carbon Arc, Joshua Daniel O., and Leo Reynolds (credited twice). It concludes by encouraging the reader to create their own presentation on SlideShare.
O documento discute um programa defeituoso de radioterapia chamado Therac-25 que causou a morte ou danos graves a pacientes entre 1985 e 1987 devido a falhas na programação que resultaram em grandes doses de radiação.
Aprendemos a mirar la obra de Julião Sarmento, despues de nuestra visita al Centro de Arte Contemporáneo de Málaga (CAC) y trasladamos nuestras impresiones a los trabajos realizados en el aula.
Aumentó la eficacia de la graduación en las universidades estatalesEduardo Nelson German
Entre 2003 y 2012, la graduación universitaria total en Argentina aumentó un 42,1%, liderado por las ciencias sociales cuya graduación aumentó un 50,1%. La graduación en universidades privadas se duplicó durante este período, mientras que la graduación estatal solo aumentó un 23,9%.
This short document contains photo credits for 5 different photographers - Christoph Zurbuchen, Carbon Arc, Joshua Daniel O., and Leo Reynolds (credited twice). It concludes by encouraging the reader to create their own presentation on SlideShare.
The document outlines a road map for PID Forum Finland with 3 key steps: 1) Creating engagement around PIDs by raising awareness and building skills and trust. 2) Organizing management and funding by describing use cases, creating proofs of concept, and defining requirements. 3) Creating infrastructure by ensuring interoperability, building a resolver, and organizing support services. The overall goal is to make information traceable across different channels now and in the future.
Esitys kirjastoverkkopäivillä lokakuussa 2021. Puhuin tutkimusaineistoista kuvailun kohteena, pysyvistä tunnisteista ja joistakin muista asioista liittyen tutkimusdatan erityispiirteisiin.
Esitys Kansalliskirjaston Kulttuuriperintöaineistot ja tutkimusdata --yhteistyön rajapintoja verkkotapahtumassa 4.3.2021. In this presentation I discussed research data management and how the Fairdata services enables implementing the FAIR data principles in research data publication.
Presentation at Digital Humanities in the Nordics 2020 conference in panel: Towards deterioration, disappearance or destruction? Discussing the critical issue of long-term sustainability of digital humanities projects
In an expert webinar on April 15th 2020 we discussed (in Finnish) how the FAIR data principles affect service development in RDM services. I presented some relevant outputs from the FAIRsFAIR project. These are the slides (in English). The webinar will be published on the fairdata.fi service site https://www.fairdata.fi/koulutus/koulutuksen-tallenteet/
1) The document summarizes a report on requirements for FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data persistence and interoperability.
2) It describes a 36-month, 10 million euro project involving 22 partners from 8 EU member states working on practical implementations of semantic interoperability across research infrastructures.
3) The report analyzes the current landscape of FAIR technologies, semantic artifacts, and infrastructure initiatives; identifies challenges around scope, terminology, and rapid development; and concludes that solutions must be user-friendly, context-sensitive, and transparent while promoting adoption of standards and registries.
Collections meet the researcher. Digitalization, disintegration and disillusi...Jessica Parland-von Essen
Presentation at the LAM3 seminar in Uppsala, 9th of October 2019. On digitalization, researchers and data in the context of cultural heritage collections. The slides mostly contain headings, but the two last slides include a list of relevant reading on the subject.
Presentation on how research data can be divided into categories and how this can help data management for both service providers and researchers. Paper will be published in the journal Informaatiotutkimus in December 2018.
This document discusses best practices for organizing, managing, and publishing research data. It recommends using standardized file naming and folder structures, documenting data through code books and metadata, selecting open formats, and considering issues like data security, versions, and citations. FAIR principles of findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable data are presented. Options in Finland for publishing and archiving research data include repositories like FSD Tietoarkisto and Zenodo. Adopting these practices helps ensure well-organized, documented data that can enable reproducibility and reuse.
This document discusses making data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR). It provides principles for each component and examples of metadata standards and repositories that help achieve FAIR data. Resources referenced include guidelines for assigning persistent identifiers to data and metadata, describing data with rich metadata using shared vocabularies, and indexing metadata in searchable resources to enable discovery and access.
The document discusses open science and how it has changed research practices. It defines open science as making research data, notes, and processes openly available for collaboration and reuse. It outlines benefits like increasing quality, impact and innovation. Barriers like publishing costs are mentioned. The document recommends openly licensing data and publications, using open peer review and platforms, and sharing materials like code and presentations. Proper data management is important for openness, reproducibility and ensuring research integrity.
This document discusses data management practices in research. It defines research data and emphasizes the importance of good data management for ensuring integrity, reproducibility and excellence in science. Key aspects of data management include planning, documentation, metadata, sustainability, and publication. Funders increasingly require and support open access to publications and research data. The document provides guidance and considerations for implementing responsible data management and open science practices.
The document outlines a road map for PID Forum Finland with 3 key steps: 1) Creating engagement around PIDs by raising awareness and building skills and trust. 2) Organizing management and funding by describing use cases, creating proofs of concept, and defining requirements. 3) Creating infrastructure by ensuring interoperability, building a resolver, and organizing support services. The overall goal is to make information traceable across different channels now and in the future.
Esitys kirjastoverkkopäivillä lokakuussa 2021. Puhuin tutkimusaineistoista kuvailun kohteena, pysyvistä tunnisteista ja joistakin muista asioista liittyen tutkimusdatan erityispiirteisiin.
Esitys Kansalliskirjaston Kulttuuriperintöaineistot ja tutkimusdata --yhteistyön rajapintoja verkkotapahtumassa 4.3.2021. In this presentation I discussed research data management and how the Fairdata services enables implementing the FAIR data principles in research data publication.
Presentation at Digital Humanities in the Nordics 2020 conference in panel: Towards deterioration, disappearance or destruction? Discussing the critical issue of long-term sustainability of digital humanities projects
In an expert webinar on April 15th 2020 we discussed (in Finnish) how the FAIR data principles affect service development in RDM services. I presented some relevant outputs from the FAIRsFAIR project. These are the slides (in English). The webinar will be published on the fairdata.fi service site https://www.fairdata.fi/koulutus/koulutuksen-tallenteet/
1) The document summarizes a report on requirements for FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data persistence and interoperability.
2) It describes a 36-month, 10 million euro project involving 22 partners from 8 EU member states working on practical implementations of semantic interoperability across research infrastructures.
3) The report analyzes the current landscape of FAIR technologies, semantic artifacts, and infrastructure initiatives; identifies challenges around scope, terminology, and rapid development; and concludes that solutions must be user-friendly, context-sensitive, and transparent while promoting adoption of standards and registries.
Collections meet the researcher. Digitalization, disintegration and disillusi...Jessica Parland-von Essen
Presentation at the LAM3 seminar in Uppsala, 9th of October 2019. On digitalization, researchers and data in the context of cultural heritage collections. The slides mostly contain headings, but the two last slides include a list of relevant reading on the subject.
Presentation on how research data can be divided into categories and how this can help data management for both service providers and researchers. Paper will be published in the journal Informaatiotutkimus in December 2018.
This document discusses best practices for organizing, managing, and publishing research data. It recommends using standardized file naming and folder structures, documenting data through code books and metadata, selecting open formats, and considering issues like data security, versions, and citations. FAIR principles of findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable data are presented. Options in Finland for publishing and archiving research data include repositories like FSD Tietoarkisto and Zenodo. Adopting these practices helps ensure well-organized, documented data that can enable reproducibility and reuse.
This document discusses making data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR). It provides principles for each component and examples of metadata standards and repositories that help achieve FAIR data. Resources referenced include guidelines for assigning persistent identifiers to data and metadata, describing data with rich metadata using shared vocabularies, and indexing metadata in searchable resources to enable discovery and access.
The document discusses open science and how it has changed research practices. It defines open science as making research data, notes, and processes openly available for collaboration and reuse. It outlines benefits like increasing quality, impact and innovation. Barriers like publishing costs are mentioned. The document recommends openly licensing data and publications, using open peer review and platforms, and sharing materials like code and presentations. Proper data management is important for openness, reproducibility and ensuring research integrity.
This document discusses data management practices in research. It defines research data and emphasizes the importance of good data management for ensuring integrity, reproducibility and excellence in science. Key aspects of data management include planning, documentation, metadata, sustainability, and publication. Funders increasingly require and support open access to publications and research data. The document provides guidance and considerations for implementing responsible data management and open science practices.
8. Avoin
Infrastruktuuri on avoin
kaikille
Infrastruktuuria voi käyttää
anonyymisti
Infrastruktuurin käyttö on
kaikille ilmaista
Infrastruktuurin käytön avulla
saatuja tuloksia ei tarvitse
julkaista
Suljettu
Infrastruktuuri on avoin vain
hakuprosessin läpäisseille
Infrastruktuurin käyttö edellyttää
tunnistautumista ja/tai
kirjautumista
Käyttö on kaikille maksullista
Tulokset on julkaistava avoimella
alustalla
TUTKIMUKSEN INFRASTRUKTUURIT
9. Suosituksia infrastruktuureille
Hyvä löydettävyys
Selkeä ohjeistus
Selkeä hinnoittelu
Hyvä tiedonhallinta
ja tietoturva
Tuetaan avointa
tiedettä
Yhteismitallisuus ja
standardit
huomoitava
10. Vaikuttavuuden mittaaminen
Meritoitumisen tukeminen: tutkimustyöstä palkitseminen ja
meriittien oikeudenmukainen jakaminen toimijoiden kesken
Tutkimustyön ohjaaminen ja suuntaaminen: rajallisten
tutkimuspanosten suuntaaminen vaikuttavuudeltaan
optimaalisiin kohteisiin
Tieteen ja tutkimuksen vertailtavuuden ja läpinäkyvyyden
lisääminen: kahteen edelliseen kohtaan liittyen on tarvetta
luoda viitekehyksiä, jossa toimijoiden vertailu tapahtuu
mahdollisimman läpinäkyvästi ja toistettavasti