SlideShare a Scribd company logo
s n a p s h o t
Staffing and Quality in
California’s Nursing Homes
2006
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 2
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
C O N T E N T S
Number of Fulltime Nursing Staff in
Hospitals and Nursing Homes . . . . . .3
Nurse Staffing Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Nurse Staffing Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Nursing Hours by Ownership Type. . . .6
Facilities that Meet Staffing Goals
by Ownership Type. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
by Facility and Ownership Type . . . . .8
Total Deficiencies and Citations
by Staffing Level. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
Top Ten Deficiencies
in Nursing Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
Complaints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
Staff Turnover and Satisfaction in
Nursing Facilities, National . . . . . . .12
Freestanding Nursing Home (FNH)
Turnover Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
Nurse Staff Turnover Rate
by Staffing Level. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Deficiencies Among Freestanding
Nursing Facilities, by Turnover Rate 15
Turnover and Deficiencies
by Ownership Type. . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
Wages in Freestanding Facilities
by Nursing Turnover Rates. . . . . . . .17
Authors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Introduction
Staffing levels in California’s nursing homes are a key indicator of the quality of
care. A study from the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
found that homes with low staff levels have an increased probability of causing
serious harm to residents. In 1999, the state passed a law increasing minimum
staffing level from 3.0 to 3.2 hours per resident day.
Since that time the percentage of nursing homes not meeting the new standard
fell from 41 to 24 percent. Among other findings in this snapshot:
• Seventy-nine percent of hospital-based facilities and 21 percent of
free-standing facilities meet the 1999 standards.
• Homes with more staff have higher staff satisfaction rates, significantly
less turnover, and fewer documented deficiencies in care.
• Nearly half of resident complaints center on poor food and more than
38 percent of complaints concern quality of care.
Although there have been improvements in increasing staffing levels for
California’s nursing homes, this snapshot illustrates that levels are still not at the
recommended level for providing high quality care to nursing home residents
across the state.
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 3
2003200020032000
131,293
33,860
10,525
86,908
122,990
30,530
10,332
82,128
59,946
42,334
11,286
6,326
63,990
46,024
12,326
5,640
Licensed Nurse
Nursing Assistant
Registered Nurse
Nursing Home Staff
Hospital Staff
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Of the almost 200,000
nursing staff working
in California in 2003,
about a third worked in
nursing facilities and a
majority of those were
nursing assistants.
Number of Fulltime Nursing Staff in
Hospitals and Nursing Homes, 2000 vs. 2003
Source: Division of Nursing, Bureau of the Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Spratley, E., Johnson, A., Sochalski, J., Fritz, M. and Spencer, W. 2000. The Registered Nurse Population March 2000: Findings from the National Sample Survey of
Registered Nurses. Washington, DC.
Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. 2000 and 2003. Long-Term Care Facility Data. Pivot tables. Sacramento, CA.
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 4
2003200220012000
3.60
3.96
4.06 4.00
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Source: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California. San Francisco. Calculations provided using Office of Statewide Health Planning and
Development’s long term care and hospital annual financial data for 2000–2003.
Nurse Staffing Hours, 2000–2003
Average Hours per Resident Day
Higher levels of nurse
staffing are related
to better quality of
care. Since legislation
was passed for a
minimum of 3.2 hours
per resident day in
California in 1999,
average nurse staffing
hours for residents in
nursing homes have
increased.
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 5
41%
56%
3%
24%
71%
5%
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Nurse Staffing Levels, 2001 vs. 2003
Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations using the Office of Statewide Health Planning and
Development’s long-term care annual financial data for 2001 and 2003; Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Appropriateness of Minimum Nurse Staffing Ratios
in Nursing Homes, Report to Congress, 2001.
Between 2001 and
2003, the number of
homes that failed to
meet state-mandated
staffing standards fell
58 percent. Still, nearly
one in four homes did
not meet the standard
in 2003.
■ Recommended
(4.1+ hours)
■ State Mandated
(3.2+ hours)
■ Below State Mandated
(< 3.2 hours)
Hours per Resident Day
2001 2003
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 6
For ProfitNonprofit
6.47
1.68
1.39
3.40
3.49
.40
.70
2.39
Registered Nurse (RN)
Licensed Nurse (LVN)
Nursing Assistant
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Nursing Hours by Ownership Type,
2003
In 2003, 11 percent
of nursing hours in
for profits were
provided by RNs while
26 percent of nursing
hours were by RNs
in nonprofit facilities.
Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health
Planning and Development’s long term care and hospital financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program,
Automated Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003.
Total Hours of Care per Resident Day
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 7
Nonprofit
TOTAL
For Profit
2000 2001 2002 2003
Nonprofit 81% 90% 90% 93%
TOTAL 43% 60% 71% 76%
For Profit 36% 53% 68% 73%
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Most (93 percent)
nonprofit nursing
homes meet the
minimum state staffing
standard (3.2 hours per
resident day); staffing
levels have increased
over this four-year
period.
Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California. San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health
Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated
Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003.
Facilities that Meet Staffing Goals
by Ownership Type, 2000–2003
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 8
Hospital-based
79%
Freestanding
21%
Nonprofit
62%
For Profit
38%
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Studies have shown
that a staffing goal
between 4.1 and 4.5
hours per resident
day, depending on the
needs of the residents
in a facility, provides
the most appropriate
level of care. Most
nursing homes that
meet this staffing goal
are hospital-based or
nonprofits.
Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health
Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000-2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated
Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003.
Facilities that Meet Staffing Goals
by Facility and Ownership Type
Facility Type Ownership Type
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 9
Meets…
Minimum Standard
3.2 hours per resident day
Recommended Goal
4.1 to 4.5 hours per resident day
2000 2001 2002 2003
13.39 14.83 14.81 14.29
8.57 9.62 9.53 9.13
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Total Deficiencies and Citations
by Staffing Level, 2000–2003
Nursing homes that
met the recommended
goal (4.1 to 4.5 hours
per resident day) had
more than one-third
fewer deficiencies than
those that met the
state minimum staffing
standard (3.2 hours per
resident day).
Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health
Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated
Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003.
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 10
Housekeeping
Pharmacy Procedures
Infection Control
Hazards
Incomplete Care Plan
Unnecessary Drugs
Dignity Not Respected
Incomplete Records
Quality Care
Food 46.2%
38.7%
33.7%
30.2%
28.9%
28.8%
28.8%
28.2%
25.4%
24.1%
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Almost half of surveyed
nursing facilities
reported food-related
deficiencies; more
than a third reported
deficiencies that were
quality of care-related.
Source: CMS OSCAR Survey Data, updated December 2005. Prepared by CAHF IRC January 2006.
Top Ten Deficiencies
in Nursing Facilities, 2005
Percent Reporting
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 11
Met Recommended Goal
(4.1+ hours)
Met Minimum Standard
(3.2+ hours)
1.6
2.8
2.1
1.0
Quality of CareTotal
Number of Complaints
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Complaints
Total and Quality of Care, 2003
Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health
Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated
Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003.
The number of total
complaints and quality
of care complaints
is higher at nursing
homes that meet the
minimum state staffing
requirement (3.2 hours
per resident day) than
those that meet the
recommended goal
(4.1 to 4.5 hours per
resident day).
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 12
…High Number of Satisfied Staff
…Fair Number of Satisfied Staff
…Very Few Satisfied Staff
8%
79%
18%
66%
36%
58%
Staff Satisfaction
Turnover Rate
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Staff Turnover and Satisfaction
in Nursing Facilities, National, 2003
Nursing facilities with
higher percentages
of satisfied staff have
lower turnover rates.
Share of Very Satisfied Staff in a Facility with…
Source: Tellis-Nayak, V., Customer Satisfaction in Long Term Care: A Guide to Assessing Quality, AHCA, 2003.
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 13
2003200220012000
80% 80%
70%
65%
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Freestanding Nursing Home (FNH)
Turnover Rates, 2000–2003
Turnover rates for
nursing staff in
freestanding nursing
homes decreased
by 19 percent from
2000 to 2003.
Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using Office of Statewide Health Planning and
Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003. Employee [percent] turnover rates for health care and social services, NOBSCOT
www.nobscot.com/survey/us_voluntary_turnover_0103.cfm.
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 14
Met Recommended Goal
(4.1+ hours)
Below Recommended Goal
(< 4.1 hours)
66%
55%
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
The turnover rate for
nursing homes that
met the recommended
nurse staffing goal
of 4.1 to 4.5 hours
per resident day was
significantly lower than
for nursing homes that
did not meet the goal.
Source: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California. San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health
Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated
Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003.
Nurse Staff Turnover Rate
by Staffing Level, 2003
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 15
Low Turnover
(< 47%)
Medium Turnover
(47% to 71%)
High Turnover
(72%+)
16.0
14.5
13.2
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
In 2003, nursing homes
with the highest
turnover rates received
a higher number of
deficiencies than those
nursing homes with
average or low turnover
rates.
Deficiencies Among Freestanding
Nursing Facilities, by Turnover Rate, 2003
Average Number of Deficiencies
Source: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California. San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health
Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated
Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003.
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 16
Average Number of DeficienciesNurse Turnover Rate
55%
66%
15.2
9.7
NonprofitFor Profit
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Turnover and Deficiencies
by Ownership Type, 2003
Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health
Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated
Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003.
Nonprofit nursing
facilities have lower
turnover rates and
fewer deficiencies than
for-profit facilities.
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 17
Low Turnover
(< 47%)
High Turnover
(72%+)
$10.17
Licensed Nurse (LVN)Nursing Assistant
$22.52
$10.76
$23.21
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Wages in Freestanding Facilities
by Nursing Turnover Rates, 2003
Wages for nursing
assistants and
licensed nurses were
significantly lower in
nursing homes with
high turnover rates
than in nursing homes
with low turnover rates.
Low wages is one of
the primary reasons
for high turnover rates
among nursing staff.
Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health
Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated
Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003.
< < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 18
GIVE US YOUR FEEDBACK
Was the information provided in this
report of value? Are there additional
kinds of information or data you would
like to see included in future reports of
this type? Is there other research in this
subject area you would like to see?
We would like to know.
Please click here to access
our feedback form. Or visit
www.chcf.org/feedback and
enter Report Code #1090.
Thank you.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
California HealthCare
Foundation
476 9th Street
Oakland, CA 94607
510.238.1040
www.chcf.org
Nursing Home
Staffing and Quality
Authors
Charlene Harrington, Ph.D., Janis O’Meara, M.P.A., and Taewoon Kang, Ph.D.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, UCSF
< < P R E V I O U S

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

NDNQI Case Study
NDNQI Case StudyNDNQI Case Study
NDNQI Case Study
Scott Bille
 
Rising from projects to programs and improve accountability - Oracle Primaver...
Rising from projects to programs and improve accountability - Oracle Primaver...Rising from projects to programs and improve accountability - Oracle Primaver...
Rising from projects to programs and improve accountability - Oracle Primaver...
p6academy
 
Natacion
NatacionNatacion
Natacion
Alejandro Alva
 
Ferraro & Asociados Water engineering / autonomous drinking water treatment ...
Ferraro & Asociados Water engineering /  autonomous drinking water treatment ...Ferraro & Asociados Water engineering /  autonomous drinking water treatment ...
Ferraro & Asociados Water engineering / autonomous drinking water treatment ...
Ferraro Ingeniería del Agua
 
HospiceSnapshotCostQuality06
HospiceSnapshotCostQuality06HospiceSnapshotCostQuality06
HospiceSnapshotCostQuality06
Janis O'Meara
 
EGYPT- "March of a Million" February 1-2011
EGYPT- "March of a Million" February 1-2011EGYPT- "March of a Million" February 1-2011
EGYPT- "March of a Million" February 1-2011
Nubia **
 
This Guideline Will Tell You Where To Find A Real Estate Agent
This Guideline Will Tell You Where To Find A Real Estate AgentThis Guideline Will Tell You Where To Find A Real Estate Agent
This Guideline Will Tell You Where To Find A Real Estate Agent
abusivedepictio71
 
Lamont 2 page Resume
Lamont 2 page ResumeLamont 2 page Resume
Lamont 2 page ResumeLamont Veal
 
Natacion
NatacionNatacion
Natacion
Max Burga Novoa
 
Animal Language Play
Animal Language PlayAnimal Language Play
Animal Language Play
Bernie DeKoven
 
Informe ii topo
Informe ii topoInforme ii topo
shareholder performance janis omeara
shareholder performance janis omearashareholder performance janis omeara
shareholder performance janis omeara
Janis O'Meara
 
Guia nom 002-stps-2010
Guia nom 002-stps-2010Guia nom 002-stps-2010
Guia nom 002-stps-2010
EDGAR SANDIN
 
Retos del nuevo directivo.Challenges of the new management
Retos del nuevo directivo.Challenges of the new managementRetos del nuevo directivo.Challenges of the new management
Retos del nuevo directivo.Challenges of the new management
Almudena Valdor
 
kpk , By Kiran.p.kulkarni Waste water and solid waste management Date 14 Jan...
kpk , By Kiran.p.kulkarni Waste water and solid waste management  Date 14 Jan...kpk , By Kiran.p.kulkarni Waste water and solid waste management  Date 14 Jan...
kpk , By Kiran.p.kulkarni Waste water and solid waste management Date 14 Jan...
bangaloreenvironment
 
Sistemas de protección contra incendios
Sistemas de protección contra incendiosSistemas de protección contra incendios
Sistemas de protección contra incendios
UGC / ULSA / UA
 
case presentation on retinitis pigmentosa (low vision aid)
case presentation on retinitis pigmentosa (low vision aid)case presentation on retinitis pigmentosa (low vision aid)
case presentation on retinitis pigmentosa (low vision aid)
avinas
 
Presentació123
Presentació123Presentació123

Viewers also liked (19)

NDNQI Case Study
NDNQI Case StudyNDNQI Case Study
NDNQI Case Study
 
Rising from projects to programs and improve accountability - Oracle Primaver...
Rising from projects to programs and improve accountability - Oracle Primaver...Rising from projects to programs and improve accountability - Oracle Primaver...
Rising from projects to programs and improve accountability - Oracle Primaver...
 
Natacion
NatacionNatacion
Natacion
 
Ferraro & Asociados Water engineering / autonomous drinking water treatment ...
Ferraro & Asociados Water engineering /  autonomous drinking water treatment ...Ferraro & Asociados Water engineering /  autonomous drinking water treatment ...
Ferraro & Asociados Water engineering / autonomous drinking water treatment ...
 
HospiceSnapshotCostQuality06
HospiceSnapshotCostQuality06HospiceSnapshotCostQuality06
HospiceSnapshotCostQuality06
 
EGYPT- "March of a Million" February 1-2011
EGYPT- "March of a Million" February 1-2011EGYPT- "March of a Million" February 1-2011
EGYPT- "March of a Million" February 1-2011
 
This Guideline Will Tell You Where To Find A Real Estate Agent
This Guideline Will Tell You Where To Find A Real Estate AgentThis Guideline Will Tell You Where To Find A Real Estate Agent
This Guideline Will Tell You Where To Find A Real Estate Agent
 
Lamont 2 page Resume
Lamont 2 page ResumeLamont 2 page Resume
Lamont 2 page Resume
 
Natacion
NatacionNatacion
Natacion
 
Animal Language Play
Animal Language PlayAnimal Language Play
Animal Language Play
 
Informe ii topo
Informe ii topoInforme ii topo
Informe ii topo
 
shareholder performance janis omeara
shareholder performance janis omearashareholder performance janis omeara
shareholder performance janis omeara
 
Guia nom 002-stps-2010
Guia nom 002-stps-2010Guia nom 002-stps-2010
Guia nom 002-stps-2010
 
Diploma
DiplomaDiploma
Diploma
 
Retos del nuevo directivo.Challenges of the new management
Retos del nuevo directivo.Challenges of the new managementRetos del nuevo directivo.Challenges of the new management
Retos del nuevo directivo.Challenges of the new management
 
kpk , By Kiran.p.kulkarni Waste water and solid waste management Date 14 Jan...
kpk , By Kiran.p.kulkarni Waste water and solid waste management  Date 14 Jan...kpk , By Kiran.p.kulkarni Waste water and solid waste management  Date 14 Jan...
kpk , By Kiran.p.kulkarni Waste water and solid waste management Date 14 Jan...
 
Sistemas de protección contra incendios
Sistemas de protección contra incendiosSistemas de protección contra incendios
Sistemas de protección contra incendios
 
case presentation on retinitis pigmentosa (low vision aid)
case presentation on retinitis pigmentosa (low vision aid)case presentation on retinitis pigmentosa (low vision aid)
case presentation on retinitis pigmentosa (low vision aid)
 
Presentació123
Presentació123Presentació123
Presentació123
 

Similar to SnapshotNursingHomeStaffingQuality06

SnapshotHomeHealth2006
SnapshotHomeHealth2006SnapshotHomeHealth2006
SnapshotHomeHealth2006
Janis O'Meara
 
FragileNursingHomeIndustrySnapshot2005
FragileNursingHomeIndustrySnapshot2005FragileNursingHomeIndustrySnapshot2005
FragileNursingHomeIndustrySnapshot2005
Janis O'Meara
 
nursing home indicators of quality janis omeara
nursing home indicators of quality janis omearanursing home indicators of quality janis omeara
nursing home indicators of quality janis omeara
Janis O'Meara
 
NursingHomeSnapshot04
NursingHomeSnapshot04NursingHomeSnapshot04
NursingHomeSnapshot04
Janis O'Meara
 
Physician quality reporting in the USA
Physician quality reporting in the USAPhysician quality reporting in the USA
Physician quality reporting in the USA
Talor Sax
 
Faith Community Nursing_documentaion
Faith Community Nursing_documentaionFaith Community Nursing_documentaion
Faith Community Nursing_documentaion
Yisehak Tura
 
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
domenicacullison
 
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
jesusamckone
 
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
vickeryr87
 
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
lorainedeserre
 
1Running head Practice of NursingHow Practi.docx
1Running head Practice of NursingHow Practi.docx1Running head Practice of NursingHow Practi.docx
1Running head Practice of NursingHow Practi.docx
vickeryr87
 
CFPHD Guest Speaker Dr. Chisholm: Nursing Home Quality and Financial Performance
CFPHD Guest Speaker Dr. Chisholm: Nursing Home Quality and Financial PerformanceCFPHD Guest Speaker Dr. Chisholm: Nursing Home Quality and Financial Performance
CFPHD Guest Speaker Dr. Chisholm: Nursing Home Quality and Financial Performance
CFPHD
 
IAFCC 2014 Statewide Survey Report Print Final
IAFCC 2014 Statewide Survey Report Print FinalIAFCC 2014 Statewide Survey Report Print Final
IAFCC 2014 Statewide Survey Report Print Final
Leslie Ramyk
 
Debra C. Hairr Helen Salisbury M ark Johannsson N a n .docx
Debra C. Hairr Helen Salisbury M ark Johannsson N a n .docxDebra C. Hairr Helen Salisbury M ark Johannsson N a n .docx
Debra C. Hairr Helen Salisbury M ark Johannsson N a n .docx
simonithomas47935
 
JONAVolume 41, Number 3, pp 129-137Copyright B 2011 Wolter.docx
JONAVolume 41, Number 3, pp 129-137Copyright B 2011 Wolter.docxJONAVolume 41, Number 3, pp 129-137Copyright B 2011 Wolter.docx
JONAVolume 41, Number 3, pp 129-137Copyright B 2011 Wolter.docx
christiandean12115
 
The U.S. Nursing Labor Market Report 2014
The U.S. Nursing Labor Market Report 2014The U.S. Nursing Labor Market Report 2014
The U.S. Nursing Labor Market Report 2014
Identified
 
California Competes - CA Wellness Foundation Conference on Health Professions
California Competes - CA Wellness Foundation Conference on Health ProfessionsCalifornia Competes - CA Wellness Foundation Conference on Health Professions
California Competes - CA Wellness Foundation Conference on Health Professions
CalCompetes
 
PowerPoint Presentation
PowerPoint PresentationPowerPoint Presentation
PowerPoint Presentation
webhostingguy
 
Registered Nurse Staffing Legislation: Why registered nurse staffing benefits...
Registered Nurse Staffing Legislation: Why registered nurse staffing benefits...Registered Nurse Staffing Legislation: Why registered nurse staffing benefits...
Registered Nurse Staffing Legislation: Why registered nurse staffing benefits...
Roberto Rivera-Olmo, BSN, RN
 
The Arizona Crisis Now Model: AHCCCS Outcomes
The Arizona Crisis Now Model: AHCCCS OutcomesThe Arizona Crisis Now Model: AHCCCS Outcomes
The Arizona Crisis Now Model: AHCCCS Outcomes
David Covington
 

Similar to SnapshotNursingHomeStaffingQuality06 (20)

SnapshotHomeHealth2006
SnapshotHomeHealth2006SnapshotHomeHealth2006
SnapshotHomeHealth2006
 
FragileNursingHomeIndustrySnapshot2005
FragileNursingHomeIndustrySnapshot2005FragileNursingHomeIndustrySnapshot2005
FragileNursingHomeIndustrySnapshot2005
 
nursing home indicators of quality janis omeara
nursing home indicators of quality janis omearanursing home indicators of quality janis omeara
nursing home indicators of quality janis omeara
 
NursingHomeSnapshot04
NursingHomeSnapshot04NursingHomeSnapshot04
NursingHomeSnapshot04
 
Physician quality reporting in the USA
Physician quality reporting in the USAPhysician quality reporting in the USA
Physician quality reporting in the USA
 
Faith Community Nursing_documentaion
Faith Community Nursing_documentaionFaith Community Nursing_documentaion
Faith Community Nursing_documentaion
 
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
 
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
 
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
 
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
23Health Professions Press, Inc.Post Off.docx
 
1Running head Practice of NursingHow Practi.docx
1Running head Practice of NursingHow Practi.docx1Running head Practice of NursingHow Practi.docx
1Running head Practice of NursingHow Practi.docx
 
CFPHD Guest Speaker Dr. Chisholm: Nursing Home Quality and Financial Performance
CFPHD Guest Speaker Dr. Chisholm: Nursing Home Quality and Financial PerformanceCFPHD Guest Speaker Dr. Chisholm: Nursing Home Quality and Financial Performance
CFPHD Guest Speaker Dr. Chisholm: Nursing Home Quality and Financial Performance
 
IAFCC 2014 Statewide Survey Report Print Final
IAFCC 2014 Statewide Survey Report Print FinalIAFCC 2014 Statewide Survey Report Print Final
IAFCC 2014 Statewide Survey Report Print Final
 
Debra C. Hairr Helen Salisbury M ark Johannsson N a n .docx
Debra C. Hairr Helen Salisbury M ark Johannsson N a n .docxDebra C. Hairr Helen Salisbury M ark Johannsson N a n .docx
Debra C. Hairr Helen Salisbury M ark Johannsson N a n .docx
 
JONAVolume 41, Number 3, pp 129-137Copyright B 2011 Wolter.docx
JONAVolume 41, Number 3, pp 129-137Copyright B 2011 Wolter.docxJONAVolume 41, Number 3, pp 129-137Copyright B 2011 Wolter.docx
JONAVolume 41, Number 3, pp 129-137Copyright B 2011 Wolter.docx
 
The U.S. Nursing Labor Market Report 2014
The U.S. Nursing Labor Market Report 2014The U.S. Nursing Labor Market Report 2014
The U.S. Nursing Labor Market Report 2014
 
California Competes - CA Wellness Foundation Conference on Health Professions
California Competes - CA Wellness Foundation Conference on Health ProfessionsCalifornia Competes - CA Wellness Foundation Conference on Health Professions
California Competes - CA Wellness Foundation Conference on Health Professions
 
PowerPoint Presentation
PowerPoint PresentationPowerPoint Presentation
PowerPoint Presentation
 
Registered Nurse Staffing Legislation: Why registered nurse staffing benefits...
Registered Nurse Staffing Legislation: Why registered nurse staffing benefits...Registered Nurse Staffing Legislation: Why registered nurse staffing benefits...
Registered Nurse Staffing Legislation: Why registered nurse staffing benefits...
 
The Arizona Crisis Now Model: AHCCCS Outcomes
The Arizona Crisis Now Model: AHCCCS OutcomesThe Arizona Crisis Now Model: AHCCCS Outcomes
The Arizona Crisis Now Model: AHCCCS Outcomes
 

SnapshotNursingHomeStaffingQuality06

  • 1. s n a p s h o t Staffing and Quality in California’s Nursing Homes 2006
  • 2. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 2 Nursing Home Staffing and Quality C O N T E N T S Number of Fulltime Nursing Staff in Hospitals and Nursing Homes . . . . . .3 Nurse Staffing Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Nurse Staffing Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Nursing Hours by Ownership Type. . . .6 Facilities that Meet Staffing Goals by Ownership Type. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 by Facility and Ownership Type . . . . .8 Total Deficiencies and Citations by Staffing Level. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 Top Ten Deficiencies in Nursing Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 Complaints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 Staff Turnover and Satisfaction in Nursing Facilities, National . . . . . . .12 Freestanding Nursing Home (FNH) Turnover Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13 Nurse Staff Turnover Rate by Staffing Level. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Deficiencies Among Freestanding Nursing Facilities, by Turnover Rate 15 Turnover and Deficiencies by Ownership Type. . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 Wages in Freestanding Facilities by Nursing Turnover Rates. . . . . . . .17 Authors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 Introduction Staffing levels in California’s nursing homes are a key indicator of the quality of care. A study from the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) found that homes with low staff levels have an increased probability of causing serious harm to residents. In 1999, the state passed a law increasing minimum staffing level from 3.0 to 3.2 hours per resident day. Since that time the percentage of nursing homes not meeting the new standard fell from 41 to 24 percent. Among other findings in this snapshot: • Seventy-nine percent of hospital-based facilities and 21 percent of free-standing facilities meet the 1999 standards. • Homes with more staff have higher staff satisfaction rates, significantly less turnover, and fewer documented deficiencies in care. • Nearly half of resident complaints center on poor food and more than 38 percent of complaints concern quality of care. Although there have been improvements in increasing staffing levels for California’s nursing homes, this snapshot illustrates that levels are still not at the recommended level for providing high quality care to nursing home residents across the state. < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 3. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 3 2003200020032000 131,293 33,860 10,525 86,908 122,990 30,530 10,332 82,128 59,946 42,334 11,286 6,326 63,990 46,024 12,326 5,640 Licensed Nurse Nursing Assistant Registered Nurse Nursing Home Staff Hospital Staff Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Of the almost 200,000 nursing staff working in California in 2003, about a third worked in nursing facilities and a majority of those were nursing assistants. Number of Fulltime Nursing Staff in Hospitals and Nursing Homes, 2000 vs. 2003 Source: Division of Nursing, Bureau of the Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Spratley, E., Johnson, A., Sochalski, J., Fritz, M. and Spencer, W. 2000. The Registered Nurse Population March 2000: Findings from the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses. Washington, DC. Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. 2000 and 2003. Long-Term Care Facility Data. Pivot tables. Sacramento, CA. < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 4. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 4 2003200220012000 3.60 3.96 4.06 4.00 Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Source: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California. San Francisco. Calculations provided using Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long term care and hospital annual financial data for 2000–2003. Nurse Staffing Hours, 2000–2003 Average Hours per Resident Day Higher levels of nurse staffing are related to better quality of care. Since legislation was passed for a minimum of 3.2 hours per resident day in California in 1999, average nurse staffing hours for residents in nursing homes have increased. < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 5. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 5 41% 56% 3% 24% 71% 5% Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Nurse Staffing Levels, 2001 vs. 2003 Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations using the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long-term care annual financial data for 2001 and 2003; Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Appropriateness of Minimum Nurse Staffing Ratios in Nursing Homes, Report to Congress, 2001. Between 2001 and 2003, the number of homes that failed to meet state-mandated staffing standards fell 58 percent. Still, nearly one in four homes did not meet the standard in 2003. ■ Recommended (4.1+ hours) ■ State Mandated (3.2+ hours) ■ Below State Mandated (< 3.2 hours) Hours per Resident Day 2001 2003 < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 6. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 6 For ProfitNonprofit 6.47 1.68 1.39 3.40 3.49 .40 .70 2.39 Registered Nurse (RN) Licensed Nurse (LVN) Nursing Assistant Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Nursing Hours by Ownership Type, 2003 In 2003, 11 percent of nursing hours in for profits were provided by RNs while 26 percent of nursing hours were by RNs in nonprofit facilities. Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long term care and hospital financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003. Total Hours of Care per Resident Day < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 7. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 7 Nonprofit TOTAL For Profit 2000 2001 2002 2003 Nonprofit 81% 90% 90% 93% TOTAL 43% 60% 71% 76% For Profit 36% 53% 68% 73% Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Most (93 percent) nonprofit nursing homes meet the minimum state staffing standard (3.2 hours per resident day); staffing levels have increased over this four-year period. Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California. San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003. Facilities that Meet Staffing Goals by Ownership Type, 2000–2003 < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 8. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 8 Hospital-based 79% Freestanding 21% Nonprofit 62% For Profit 38% Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Studies have shown that a staffing goal between 4.1 and 4.5 hours per resident day, depending on the needs of the residents in a facility, provides the most appropriate level of care. Most nursing homes that meet this staffing goal are hospital-based or nonprofits. Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000-2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003. Facilities that Meet Staffing Goals by Facility and Ownership Type Facility Type Ownership Type < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 9. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 9 Meets… Minimum Standard 3.2 hours per resident day Recommended Goal 4.1 to 4.5 hours per resident day 2000 2001 2002 2003 13.39 14.83 14.81 14.29 8.57 9.62 9.53 9.13 Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Total Deficiencies and Citations by Staffing Level, 2000–2003 Nursing homes that met the recommended goal (4.1 to 4.5 hours per resident day) had more than one-third fewer deficiencies than those that met the state minimum staffing standard (3.2 hours per resident day). Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003. < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 10. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 10 Housekeeping Pharmacy Procedures Infection Control Hazards Incomplete Care Plan Unnecessary Drugs Dignity Not Respected Incomplete Records Quality Care Food 46.2% 38.7% 33.7% 30.2% 28.9% 28.8% 28.8% 28.2% 25.4% 24.1% Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Almost half of surveyed nursing facilities reported food-related deficiencies; more than a third reported deficiencies that were quality of care-related. Source: CMS OSCAR Survey Data, updated December 2005. Prepared by CAHF IRC January 2006. Top Ten Deficiencies in Nursing Facilities, 2005 Percent Reporting < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 11. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 11 Met Recommended Goal (4.1+ hours) Met Minimum Standard (3.2+ hours) 1.6 2.8 2.1 1.0 Quality of CareTotal Number of Complaints Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Complaints Total and Quality of Care, 2003 Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003. The number of total complaints and quality of care complaints is higher at nursing homes that meet the minimum state staffing requirement (3.2 hours per resident day) than those that meet the recommended goal (4.1 to 4.5 hours per resident day). < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 12. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 12 …High Number of Satisfied Staff …Fair Number of Satisfied Staff …Very Few Satisfied Staff 8% 79% 18% 66% 36% 58% Staff Satisfaction Turnover Rate Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Staff Turnover and Satisfaction in Nursing Facilities, National, 2003 Nursing facilities with higher percentages of satisfied staff have lower turnover rates. Share of Very Satisfied Staff in a Facility with… Source: Tellis-Nayak, V., Customer Satisfaction in Long Term Care: A Guide to Assessing Quality, AHCA, 2003. < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 13. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 13 2003200220012000 80% 80% 70% 65% Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Freestanding Nursing Home (FNH) Turnover Rates, 2000–2003 Turnover rates for nursing staff in freestanding nursing homes decreased by 19 percent from 2000 to 2003. Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003. Employee [percent] turnover rates for health care and social services, NOBSCOT www.nobscot.com/survey/us_voluntary_turnover_0103.cfm. < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 14. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 14 Met Recommended Goal (4.1+ hours) Below Recommended Goal (< 4.1 hours) 66% 55% Nursing Home Staffing and Quality The turnover rate for nursing homes that met the recommended nurse staffing goal of 4.1 to 4.5 hours per resident day was significantly lower than for nursing homes that did not meet the goal. Source: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California. San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003. Nurse Staff Turnover Rate by Staffing Level, 2003 < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 15. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 15 Low Turnover (< 47%) Medium Turnover (47% to 71%) High Turnover (72%+) 16.0 14.5 13.2 Nursing Home Staffing and Quality In 2003, nursing homes with the highest turnover rates received a higher number of deficiencies than those nursing homes with average or low turnover rates. Deficiencies Among Freestanding Nursing Facilities, by Turnover Rate, 2003 Average Number of Deficiencies Source: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California. San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003. < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 16. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 16 Average Number of DeficienciesNurse Turnover Rate 55% 66% 15.2 9.7 NonprofitFor Profit Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Turnover and Deficiencies by Ownership Type, 2003 Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003. Nonprofit nursing facilities have lower turnover rates and fewer deficiencies than for-profit facilities. < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 17. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 17 Low Turnover (< 47%) High Turnover (72%+) $10.17 Licensed Nurse (LVN)Nursing Assistant $22.52 $10.76 $23.21 Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Wages in Freestanding Facilities by Nursing Turnover Rates, 2003 Wages for nursing assistants and licensed nurses were significantly lower in nursing homes with high turnover rates than in nursing homes with low turnover rates. Low wages is one of the primary reasons for high turnover rates among nursing staff. Sources: Janis O’Meara and Charlene Harrington, University of California, San Francisco. Calculations provided using California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development’s long term care financial data for 2000–2003, and California Department of Health, Licensing and Certification Program, Automated Certification and Licensing Administrative Information and Management Systems (ACLAIMS) data January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003. < < P R E V I O U S N E X T > >
  • 18. ©2006 California HealthCare Foundation 18 GIVE US YOUR FEEDBACK Was the information provided in this report of value? Are there additional kinds of information or data you would like to see included in future reports of this type? Is there other research in this subject area you would like to see? We would like to know. Please click here to access our feedback form. Or visit www.chcf.org/feedback and enter Report Code #1090. Thank you. FOR MORE INFORMATION California HealthCare Foundation 476 9th Street Oakland, CA 94607 510.238.1040 www.chcf.org Nursing Home Staffing and Quality Authors Charlene Harrington, Ph.D., Janis O’Meara, M.P.A., and Taewoon Kang, Ph.D. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, UCSF < < P R E V I O U S