This document provides an overview of Moses chapter 4, which describes the Fall of Adam and Eve. It notes that Moses 4 shifts to a slower narrative pace compared to the previous chapters. The overview analyzes the chiastic structure of Moses 4, with the pivotal choice of Adam and Eve at the center. It also includes a modified version of a scholar's chiastic schema for the chapter. The overview sets up the more detailed examination of Moses 4 that follows in the text and commentary section.
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Selections from IGIL
1. 215Moses 4: The Fall – Overview
MOSES4
Moses 4
The Fall
Overview................................................................................................. 215
The Everlasting Covenant...........................................................................216
The Grand Councils ....................................................................................220
Rebellion in Heaven ....................................................................................223
Transgression in Eden.................................................................................227
The Nakedness and the Clothing of Adam and Eve................................234
Moses 4: Text and Commentary............................................................. 242
Gleanings ................................................................................................ 283
Endnotes ................................................................................................. 298
Overview
F
OLLOWING a rapid sweep across the vast panorama of the Creation and the Garden
of Eden in Moses 1-3, the narrative slows to a more measured pace at the beginning
of Moses 4—and with good reason, for it is at this point that the whole purpose of
Creation begins to unfold. A statement attributed to Cardinal John Henry Newman sums up
a message that can be taken from the juxtaposition of the accounts of the Creation and the
Fall: “It is better that the whole universe disappear than that one little, little lie be spoken.”1
In other words, the moral significance of the choice made in Eden—and of similar choices
we make on a daily basis—outweighs in importance the entire amoral universe.
The pivotal nature of Adam and Eve’s choice is made clear in the structure of Moses 4
itself. Wenham sees the corresponding chapter in Genesis as a “masterpiece of palistrophic
writing, the mirror-image [chiastic] style, whereby the first scene matches the last, the
second the penultimate and so on: ABCDC’B’A’… Not only does the literary structure move
in and out in this fashion, but so does the action: it commences outside the Garden, the
dialogues are conducted within the Garden, and the decisive act of disobedience takes place
at its very center.”2
In this way, the focal theme of “opposition in all things”3
reveals itself in
both the content and the structure of the account.
A modified version of Wenham’s schema, as applied to the book of Moses, follows:
A. 3:5-17: Adam and Eve are placed in the Garden and are given a commandment
B. 3:18-25: The spiritual order of relationships before the Fall
(4:1-4: Digression on Satan’s fall)
C. 4:5-11: The dialogue between Eve and the serpent
D. 4:12-14: Adam and Eve transgress the commandment
C.’ 4:15-19: The dialogue between Adam, Eve, and God
B.’ 4:20-27: The temporal order of relationships after the Fall
A.’ 4:28-31: Adam and Eve are driven out of the Garden
1 J. M. Bradshaw, AHK Notes.
2 G. J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15, p. 51. See Endnote 4-1, p. 298.
3 2 Nephi 2:11.
2. 245Moses 4: The Fall – Text and Commentary
MOSES4
In stark contrast to Satan’s speech, the Redeemer never once mentions the words “I” or “me,”
being wholly focused on the will and the glory of the Father.
d glory be thine forever. Jesus later contrasted His position to the one adopted by Satan: “He
that speaketh of himself seeketh his own glory: but he that seeketh his glory that sent him,
the same is true, and no unrighteousness is in him.”210
3 a Satan rebelled against me, and sought to destroy the agency of man. D&C 29:36 underscores
the irony of Satan’s efforts to destroy man’s agency by pointing out that it was “because of
their agency” that a “third part of the hosts of heaven” were permitted to follow him in
rebellion.
Although the exercise of agency was surely a condition of the premortal existence, Moses 7:32
seems to imply, erroneously, that it did not exist until Adam and Eve came into the Garden:
“I gave unto them their knowledge, in the day I created them; and in the Garden of Eden,
gave I unto man his agency.” ot2, however, renders this verse differently: “I gave unto them
their intelligence and in the Garden of Eden man had agency.”211
Whether this emendation
took place at the initiative of a scribe or under the direction of the Prophet, its purpose is
obvious: to make it clear that agency was not something “given” for the first time to mankind
in the Garden, but rather that it was something they already had. The modification also
forestalls a possible implication that Adam and Eve had already been given “knowledge” at
the time of their creation. Significantly, ot2 states that they were given “intelligence” rather
than “knowledge” at that time. Thus, the change leads us to infer that Adam and Eve began
to obtain the “knowledge” they lacked only later, after their transgression.
b that I should give unto him mine own power. Commented Elder Maxwell: “[Satan] wanted
glory, not growth; control, not salvation. His ascendancy meant more to him than our
agency. The Devil is a despot.”212
c by the power of mine Only Begotten. Moses had seen the power of the Only Begotten used
in a similar way when, in His name, he commanded Satan to depart.213
d I caused that he should be cast down. Lehi records that an “angel of God… had fallen from
heaven; wherefore he became a devil, having sought that which was evil before God.”214
Although Moses 4:6 and Abraham 3:28 say only that “many” followed Satan, the Doctrine
and Covenants is more specific. The Lord, speaking of Satan’s rebellion said that it was “a
third part of the hosts of heaven” that he “turned… away from me because of their agency.”215
It is possible to see an allusion to this event in the separation of light and darkness in Day
One of creation.216
A parallel can also be seen in the account of how God “drove out the
man” from the Garden217
—though, in Adam’s case, God held out the joyous possibility for
his return.
210 John 7:18.
211 S. H. Faulring et al., Original Manuscripts, p. 618; K. P. Jackson, Book of Moses, p. 25. See Excursus 47: Islamic
Perspectives Relating to Redemption, p. 645
212 N. A. Maxwell, Deposition, p. 81. See Commentary 4:1g, p. 244.
213 Commentary 1:21-c, p. 58.
214 2 Nephi 2:17; cf. Revelation 12:7-9; 2 Peter 2:4: Jude 1:6; Isaiah 14:12-17; D&C 29:36-38; Abraham 3:28.
215 D&C 29:36; cf. Revelation 12:14.
216 See Commentary 2:4-c, p. 101.
217 See Commentary 4:31-a, p. 280.
2 But, behold, my Beloved Son, which was my Beloved and Chosen from the beginning, said
unto me—Father, thy will be done, and the glory be thine forever.
3 Wherefore, because that Satan rebelled against me, and sought to destroy the agency of
man, which I, the Lord God, had given him, and also, that I should give unto him mine own
power; by the power of mine Only Begotten, I caused that he should be cast down;