Section One 10 points Using Traditional Westlaw only, locate the following case and provide the complete citation: 579 F.2d 1200 1. Name the prevailing parties in the trial court proceeding. 2. Name the trial court. Also name the appellate court. 3. What kind of case is it? 4. In your own words, provide a summary of the facts of the case 5. What are the issues on appeal? 6. Who wrote the opinion? 7. What is the docket number? 8. On what date did the court issue the decision and how did the court rule? 9. Provide the text of Headnote [6] as well as the name of the author referenced in the portion of the text which is summarized by that headnote. 10. Provide the name of the attorney or attorneys who represented the appellants. Section Two 10 points Using WestlawNext only, KeyCite the following case: Parker v. State of Oklahoma, 556 P.2d 1298 (Okla. Crim. App. 1976). A) How many citing references does the case provide? B) Has a Maryland case cited the Parker case? If so, provide the case citation for the citing case. C) Has a Connecticut case cited the Parker case? If so, provide the citation for the citing case. D) How many of the citing cases are no longer good law? Provide the citation to the case or cases. E) Have any legal encyclopedias cited Parker? If so, provide the citation to each of the articles. Section Three 5 points Your attorney has asked you to determine whether any cases in your jurisdiction have cited Headnote [6] as referenced in Question 9 of Section One above. Describe the simplest process for obtaining this information using Traditional Westlaw. Would this process be simplified or more complex using WestlawNext? Explain your answer. Section Four I have finished section four . go on with the next sction. Section Five - Use Your Appellate Brief Scenario to answer this section 20 pts FACTS: Sam Kant, stands convicted of shoplifting/petit larceny (as dictated by your state statutes) from Bilmart, a national department store. At his wife’s request, Mr. Kant went to Bilmart on Wednesday, ______, 20___, and purchased a case of six 4 oz. cans of Hoover’s Baked Beans with Bacon. Upon returning home, his wife chastised him for once again failing to purchase what she had requested. Apparently, Mrs. Kant can’t stand the taste of Hoover’s Beans, but is very fond of the Handell’s brand, and was planning to serve them to her book club when she hosted them for lunch the following afternoon. Mrs. Kant ordered her husband to return to Bilmart to exchange the Hoover’s beans for Handell’s Beans. Upon arrival at the store early the next morning, Mr. Kant found that the line for customer service was extremely long due to Bilmart’s annual sponsorship of a major community food drive. In an effort to save time, and thinking the line might be shorter upon his return, Mr. Kant placed the case of Hoover’s beans into a shopping cart, made his way through the store to the bean shelf, and then added the Handell’s beans to the cart. However, upo.