Sc order july 9
•
0 likes•187 views
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the State's counsel informed the Court that new developments have taken place, including new legislation and the constitution of tribunals. The Court directed the State to file an affidavit with details of these new developments and scheduled the next hearing for July 23, 2021. It also ordered the State to file a counter affidavit in the meantime.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Araria case bail order sc aug 4
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Kalyani Badola and another against the State of Bihar regarding their exemption from filing documents and seeking appropriate orders. The petitioners were represented by multiple advocates including Ms. Vrinda Grover and Ms. Shahrukh Alam. The Court issued a notice to the respondents. As an interim order, the Court directed the release of the petitioners on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each until further orders.
20201026 sc bilkis_bano
The Supreme Court of India heard a miscellaneous application and interlocutory application related to criminal appeals. Ms. Shobha Gupta, the counsel for the applicant, sought leave of the court to withdraw the interlocutory application with liberty to make a representation before the concerned authorities. The court dismissed the interlocutory application as withdrawn with the requested liberty. The miscellaneous application was then disposed of accordingly.
Order April 01 Rana Ayub.pdf
The petitioner Rana Ayyub filed a writ petition seeking to quash a Look Out Circular issued by Respondent No. 2 (Directorate of Enforcement) to stop her from travelling abroad. The Additional Solicitor General sought time to file a status report with some material facts. The court granted time and listed the matter for further hearing on April 4th at 2:30 PM.
21664 2021 33_19_31580_order_26-nov-2021
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition filed by Kazeem Ahmad Sherwani against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The Court granted the petitioner's request to serve an advance copy of the petition on the standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh and listed this matter along with another connected writ petition case.
Yatin oza sc order 16 jun-2020
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a Petition for Special Leave to Appeal. The petitioner, Yatin Narendra Oza, filed the petition challenging a High Court of Gujarat order. Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Supreme Court granted the permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, disposing of all pending applications as well.
Sc order 03-mar-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Tahamina Khatun and others against the Union of India and others. The petition was called for hearing before the Chief Justice and two other judges. The court heard from counsel for the petitioner and respondent. The court issued notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks, but provided no interim relief.
Victim right to appeal 14248 2020 35_1503_23651_order_28-aug-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal filed by Parvinder Kansal against the State of NCT of Delhi. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court granted leave to appeal but dismissed the criminal appeal based on a signed non-reportable order placed on the file.
Sc sedition plea dismissed order 09-feb-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Aditya Ranjan and others against the Union of India and others. After hearing arguments from both sides, the court dismissed the writ petition. All pending interlocutory applications related to the writ petition were also disposed of.
Recommended
Araria case bail order sc aug 4
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Kalyani Badola and another against the State of Bihar regarding their exemption from filing documents and seeking appropriate orders. The petitioners were represented by multiple advocates including Ms. Vrinda Grover and Ms. Shahrukh Alam. The Court issued a notice to the respondents. As an interim order, the Court directed the release of the petitioners on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each until further orders.
20201026 sc bilkis_bano
The Supreme Court of India heard a miscellaneous application and interlocutory application related to criminal appeals. Ms. Shobha Gupta, the counsel for the applicant, sought leave of the court to withdraw the interlocutory application with liberty to make a representation before the concerned authorities. The court dismissed the interlocutory application as withdrawn with the requested liberty. The miscellaneous application was then disposed of accordingly.
Order April 01 Rana Ayub.pdf
The petitioner Rana Ayyub filed a writ petition seeking to quash a Look Out Circular issued by Respondent No. 2 (Directorate of Enforcement) to stop her from travelling abroad. The Additional Solicitor General sought time to file a status report with some material facts. The court granted time and listed the matter for further hearing on April 4th at 2:30 PM.
21664 2021 33_19_31580_order_26-nov-2021
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition filed by Kazeem Ahmad Sherwani against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The Court granted the petitioner's request to serve an advance copy of the petition on the standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh and listed this matter along with another connected writ petition case.
Yatin oza sc order 16 jun-2020
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a Petition for Special Leave to Appeal. The petitioner, Yatin Narendra Oza, filed the petition challenging a High Court of Gujarat order. Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Supreme Court granted the permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, disposing of all pending applications as well.
Sc order 03-mar-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Tahamina Khatun and others against the Union of India and others. The petition was called for hearing before the Chief Justice and two other judges. The court heard from counsel for the petitioner and respondent. The court issued notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks, but provided no interim relief.
Victim right to appeal 14248 2020 35_1503_23651_order_28-aug-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal filed by Parvinder Kansal against the State of NCT of Delhi. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court granted leave to appeal but dismissed the criminal appeal based on a signed non-reportable order placed on the file.
Sc sedition plea dismissed order 09-feb-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Aditya Ranjan and others against the Union of India and others. After hearing arguments from both sides, the court dismissed the writ petition. All pending interlocutory applications related to the writ petition were also disposed of.
Sc order dated oct 28
The Supreme Court of India heard a Special Leave Petition filed by Sri Aurobindo College (Evening) against a judgment of the High Court of Delhi. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, stating that it was not inclined to entertain it under Article 136 of the Constitution. The pending applications in the case were also disposed of with the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition.
SC Order_27-Jan-2020.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition filed by T.M.D. Rafi and others against the State of Andhra Pradesh regarding the High Court of Andhra Pradesh's judgment in WP No. 40252/2015 dated September 27, 2019. The Supreme Court issued a notice returnable in six weeks, and stayed the operation of the High Court's impugned judgment until further orders.
Sc order love jihad 6.1.2021
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding Writ Petition(s) (Criminal) No(s). 405/2020. It lists the judges present, counsel for the petitioner(s) and respondent(s), and notes that upon hearing from counsel, the court ordered that a notice be issued returnable within four weeks.
Sc notice nrc order 29 jan-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard two contempt petitions filed by Jamiat Ulama I Hind against Hitesh Dev Sarma and another. The petitioners' counsel stated that the prayer to punish the respondents for contempt of court has been deleted. The court ordered that the petitions will now be treated as interlocutory applications, issued notice to the respondents returnable within four weeks.
30052 2019 4_5_17733_order_25-oct-2019
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Mukesh Gupta against the State of Chhattisgarh regarding phone tapping and appropriate orders. Senior advocates from both sides were present. The Court ordered that phone tapping of the petitioner be stopped immediately as assured by the senior counsel for the respondent. The Court also ordered that the interim order will continue and the petitioner should not be harassed or arrested until the next hearing.
Pb order 25-aug-2020
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding the suo moto contempt petition against Prashant Bhushan and another. It notes that the petition was heard by a bench of three justices. Counsel for both parties were present. After hearing arguments from all sides, the court reserved its judgment.
Sc sudarshan news order 23-sep-2020
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition filed by Firoz Iqbal Khan against the Union of India and others. It summarizes the hearing held on September 23, 2020. During the hearing, the Solicitor General requested deferring the hearing to allow the central government time to issue a notice to Sudarshan News and take action. The court agreed to defer the hearing to October 5, 2020 and ordered the notice's proceedings and any actions to be subject to the outcome of this case. The interim order from September 15, 2020 will remain in effect until further orders.
Sc order jan 25 2021
1) The Supreme Court of India heard a special leave petition filed by Jasmin Begum challenging a judgment of the Gauhati High Court.
2) Jasmin Begum's lawyer sought permission to withdraw the petition to file a review petition with the High Court instead.
3) The Supreme Court granted the permission to withdraw the petition and dismissed it, but noted that Jasmin Begum could approach the Supreme Court again if she is unsuccessful in her review petition before the High Court.
Sc prison order
The Supreme Court of India heard several matters related to the spread of COVID-19 in prisons. Counsel for petitioners, various state governments, and other parties presented arguments. The Court issued orders on specific interim applications and matters.
Sc pension order
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by the Uttar Pradesh Ground Water Department Non Gazetted Employee Association against the Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh and others. The Court issued notice on the writ petition and application for stay, returnable in six weeks. It also stayed any recovery in the interim.
Sc guj freedom of rel act order23491 2021 37_4_33358_order_14-feb-2022
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition seeking special leave to appeal against a judgment of the High Court of Gujarat regarding Jamia Ulama-e-Hind Gujarat. The bench issued a notice to the respondents. The petition was filed by the State of Gujarat against the judgment that modified an earlier order related to R/SCA Nos. 10304/2021 and 10305/2021 passed by the High Court of Gujarat. Counsel for the petitioner State of Gujarat and respondents were heard.
Kuwj vs uoi dec 2
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by the Kerala Union of Working Journalists against the Union of India regarding clarification/direction, exemption from filing O.T., and grant of bail. The Court, comprising of the Chief Justice and two other Justices, heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel Kapil Sibbal and the Solicitor General representing the respondent. The Court ordered the matter to be listed next week and for the respondent to file a reply affidavit in the meantime.
Witness protection order sc in legislator cases
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition. It summarizes the discussion during the hearing. The amicus curiae presented a report analyzing information provided by various High Courts on pending criminal cases against elected representatives. Key issues highlighted include the need for improved video conferencing infrastructure to record witness testimony, exempting witnesses from applying for protection under the witness protection scheme, appointing nodal prosecution officers to ensure cases progress swiftly, having judicial officers handle such cases for at least 2 years for continuity, and addressing specific issues faced by High Courts of Kerala and Calcutta where police are reluctant to take action against legislators. The Court will consider the suggestions to rationalize the process for expeditious disposal
Sc order apr 9 upadhyay petition
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay against the Union of India and others. Upon hearing from counsel on both sides, the Court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. As a result, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Whatas app sc order
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a petition for special leave to appeal. It lists the parties involved, their legal counsel, and the orders from the court. The court issued a notice on IA No. 6140/2021, making it returnable in 4 weeks. A reply affidavit may be filed in the meantime by the respondent, and the applicant is permitted to file a rejoinder affidavit.
Sc order quaratine protocol up
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Rohit Bhalla versus the Union of India regarding COVID matters. Counsel for both petitioner and respondents were present. The Court ordered the State of Uttar Pradesh to look into issues raised in an interlocutory application filed by Rajat Singh on the next date of hearing. Uttar Pradesh was asked to file an affidavit regarding guidelines for quarantine and treatment of asymptomatic COVID patients. The matter was listed for the week of July 6, 2020. The Solicitor General was also asked to obtain instructions on the issues.
Kuwj vs uoi jan 22
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 307/2020 filed by the Kerala Union of Working Journalists versus the Union of India and others. It notes that the matters were called for hearing and lists the lawyers present. The Court then orders, by consent of the parties, to list the matter after six weeks on a non-miscellaneous day.
Kuwj vs uoi nov 20
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by the Kerala Union of Working Journalists against the Union of India regarding the admission of various IAs seeking clarification/direction, exemption from filing O.T., and grant of bail. The Solicitor General stated that a counter affidavit had been filed, but the court did not find it on record. The petitioner was allowed to file a rejoinder affidavit. The Solicitor General also stated that advocates can meet accused in jails to take instructions and obtain signatures on vakalatnamas. The matter was listed after one week.
Sc ration card order
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition regarding providing ration to those without ration cards and universalizing the Public Distribution System. The Court noted that this was a policy issue best left to the Government of India and concerned states to consider relief. It directed the petitioners to serve the writ petition on the Solicitor General and disposed of the petition with the observation that the issue was a policy matter for the government.
Baljinder sc order 01 sep-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard a special leave petition filed by Inspector Baljinder Singh against the State of Punjab. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court dismissed the special leave petition and refused to entertain it under Article 136 of the Indian Constitution. All pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.
Letter to-dgp-18 oct21
1. The families of prisoners held in Taloja Central Prison and Byculla Women's Prison wrote a letter regarding the discontinuation of weekly telephone interviews for family members when physical visits resume.
2. They expressed concern that discontinuing phone calls would cause problems for out-of-town family members who cannot easily travel to Mumbai for physical visits, as well as economically weak and elderly relatives.
3. The letter requested that phone interviews be allowed to continue in a hybrid model, where Mumbai-based relatives could choose a physical or phone visit, to ensure prisoners' right to communicate with family and advocates as guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.
Tripura hc order
The High Court of Tripura issued an order directing the State of Tripura Aids Control Society to be impleaded as a respondent. The State and Union of India were directed to issue guidelines to conduct a thorough research of all persons in State prisons to ascertain if any are infected with HIV. If any infected persons are found, necessary action must be taken for their treatment and care in accordance with law to prevent an epidemic. A report on the matter must be submitted to the court by November 9, 2021. The court also requested an Amicus Curiae to assist and oversee the matter.
More Related Content
Similar to Sc order july 9
Sc order dated oct 28
The Supreme Court of India heard a Special Leave Petition filed by Sri Aurobindo College (Evening) against a judgment of the High Court of Delhi. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, stating that it was not inclined to entertain it under Article 136 of the Constitution. The pending applications in the case were also disposed of with the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition.
SC Order_27-Jan-2020.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition filed by T.M.D. Rafi and others against the State of Andhra Pradesh regarding the High Court of Andhra Pradesh's judgment in WP No. 40252/2015 dated September 27, 2019. The Supreme Court issued a notice returnable in six weeks, and stayed the operation of the High Court's impugned judgment until further orders.
Sc order love jihad 6.1.2021
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding Writ Petition(s) (Criminal) No(s). 405/2020. It lists the judges present, counsel for the petitioner(s) and respondent(s), and notes that upon hearing from counsel, the court ordered that a notice be issued returnable within four weeks.
Sc notice nrc order 29 jan-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard two contempt petitions filed by Jamiat Ulama I Hind against Hitesh Dev Sarma and another. The petitioners' counsel stated that the prayer to punish the respondents for contempt of court has been deleted. The court ordered that the petitions will now be treated as interlocutory applications, issued notice to the respondents returnable within four weeks.
30052 2019 4_5_17733_order_25-oct-2019
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Mukesh Gupta against the State of Chhattisgarh regarding phone tapping and appropriate orders. Senior advocates from both sides were present. The Court ordered that phone tapping of the petitioner be stopped immediately as assured by the senior counsel for the respondent. The Court also ordered that the interim order will continue and the petitioner should not be harassed or arrested until the next hearing.
Pb order 25-aug-2020
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding the suo moto contempt petition against Prashant Bhushan and another. It notes that the petition was heard by a bench of three justices. Counsel for both parties were present. After hearing arguments from all sides, the court reserved its judgment.
Sc sudarshan news order 23-sep-2020
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition filed by Firoz Iqbal Khan against the Union of India and others. It summarizes the hearing held on September 23, 2020. During the hearing, the Solicitor General requested deferring the hearing to allow the central government time to issue a notice to Sudarshan News and take action. The court agreed to defer the hearing to October 5, 2020 and ordered the notice's proceedings and any actions to be subject to the outcome of this case. The interim order from September 15, 2020 will remain in effect until further orders.
Sc order jan 25 2021
1) The Supreme Court of India heard a special leave petition filed by Jasmin Begum challenging a judgment of the Gauhati High Court.
2) Jasmin Begum's lawyer sought permission to withdraw the petition to file a review petition with the High Court instead.
3) The Supreme Court granted the permission to withdraw the petition and dismissed it, but noted that Jasmin Begum could approach the Supreme Court again if she is unsuccessful in her review petition before the High Court.
Sc prison order
The Supreme Court of India heard several matters related to the spread of COVID-19 in prisons. Counsel for petitioners, various state governments, and other parties presented arguments. The Court issued orders on specific interim applications and matters.
Sc pension order
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by the Uttar Pradesh Ground Water Department Non Gazetted Employee Association against the Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh and others. The Court issued notice on the writ petition and application for stay, returnable in six weeks. It also stayed any recovery in the interim.
Sc guj freedom of rel act order23491 2021 37_4_33358_order_14-feb-2022
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition seeking special leave to appeal against a judgment of the High Court of Gujarat regarding Jamia Ulama-e-Hind Gujarat. The bench issued a notice to the respondents. The petition was filed by the State of Gujarat against the judgment that modified an earlier order related to R/SCA Nos. 10304/2021 and 10305/2021 passed by the High Court of Gujarat. Counsel for the petitioner State of Gujarat and respondents were heard.
Kuwj vs uoi dec 2
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by the Kerala Union of Working Journalists against the Union of India regarding clarification/direction, exemption from filing O.T., and grant of bail. The Court, comprising of the Chief Justice and two other Justices, heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel Kapil Sibbal and the Solicitor General representing the respondent. The Court ordered the matter to be listed next week and for the respondent to file a reply affidavit in the meantime.
Witness protection order sc in legislator cases
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition. It summarizes the discussion during the hearing. The amicus curiae presented a report analyzing information provided by various High Courts on pending criminal cases against elected representatives. Key issues highlighted include the need for improved video conferencing infrastructure to record witness testimony, exempting witnesses from applying for protection under the witness protection scheme, appointing nodal prosecution officers to ensure cases progress swiftly, having judicial officers handle such cases for at least 2 years for continuity, and addressing specific issues faced by High Courts of Kerala and Calcutta where police are reluctant to take action against legislators. The Court will consider the suggestions to rationalize the process for expeditious disposal
Sc order apr 9 upadhyay petition
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay against the Union of India and others. Upon hearing from counsel on both sides, the Court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. As a result, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Whatas app sc order
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a petition for special leave to appeal. It lists the parties involved, their legal counsel, and the orders from the court. The court issued a notice on IA No. 6140/2021, making it returnable in 4 weeks. A reply affidavit may be filed in the meantime by the respondent, and the applicant is permitted to file a rejoinder affidavit.
Sc order quaratine protocol up
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Rohit Bhalla versus the Union of India regarding COVID matters. Counsel for both petitioner and respondents were present. The Court ordered the State of Uttar Pradesh to look into issues raised in an interlocutory application filed by Rajat Singh on the next date of hearing. Uttar Pradesh was asked to file an affidavit regarding guidelines for quarantine and treatment of asymptomatic COVID patients. The matter was listed for the week of July 6, 2020. The Solicitor General was also asked to obtain instructions on the issues.
Kuwj vs uoi jan 22
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 307/2020 filed by the Kerala Union of Working Journalists versus the Union of India and others. It notes that the matters were called for hearing and lists the lawyers present. The Court then orders, by consent of the parties, to list the matter after six weeks on a non-miscellaneous day.
Kuwj vs uoi nov 20
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by the Kerala Union of Working Journalists against the Union of India regarding the admission of various IAs seeking clarification/direction, exemption from filing O.T., and grant of bail. The Solicitor General stated that a counter affidavit had been filed, but the court did not find it on record. The petitioner was allowed to file a rejoinder affidavit. The Solicitor General also stated that advocates can meet accused in jails to take instructions and obtain signatures on vakalatnamas. The matter was listed after one week.
Sc ration card order
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition regarding providing ration to those without ration cards and universalizing the Public Distribution System. The Court noted that this was a policy issue best left to the Government of India and concerned states to consider relief. It directed the petitioners to serve the writ petition on the Solicitor General and disposed of the petition with the observation that the issue was a policy matter for the government.
Baljinder sc order 01 sep-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard a special leave petition filed by Inspector Baljinder Singh against the State of Punjab. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court dismissed the special leave petition and refused to entertain it under Article 136 of the Indian Constitution. All pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.
Similar to Sc order july 9 (20)
Sc guj freedom of rel act order23491 2021 37_4_33358_order_14-feb-2022
Sc guj freedom of rel act order23491 2021 37_4_33358_order_14-feb-2022
More from ZahidManiyar
Letter to-dgp-18 oct21
1. The families of prisoners held in Taloja Central Prison and Byculla Women's Prison wrote a letter regarding the discontinuation of weekly telephone interviews for family members when physical visits resume.
2. They expressed concern that discontinuing phone calls would cause problems for out-of-town family members who cannot easily travel to Mumbai for physical visits, as well as economically weak and elderly relatives.
3. The letter requested that phone interviews be allowed to continue in a hybrid model, where Mumbai-based relatives could choose a physical or phone visit, to ensure prisoners' right to communicate with family and advocates as guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.
Tripura hc order
The High Court of Tripura issued an order directing the State of Tripura Aids Control Society to be impleaded as a respondent. The State and Union of India were directed to issue guidelines to conduct a thorough research of all persons in State prisons to ascertain if any are infected with HIV. If any infected persons are found, necessary action must be taken for their treatment and care in accordance with law to prevent an epidemic. A report on the matter must be submitted to the court by November 9, 2021. The court also requested an Amicus Curiae to assist and oversee the matter.
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
This document summarizes an incident of communal violence and vigilantism in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. It discusses the history of communal tensions and riots in Meerut dating back to the 1930s. On September 20, 2017, two members of the Jehovah's Witnesses religious group were invited into a Hindu man's home but then detained against their will for over an hour, assaulted, and handed over to the police with false allegations of forced conversion efforts. The police refused to register a complaint about the assault and illegally detained the victims overnight without medical treatment. The document analyzes this incident as an example of the shift in India to smaller scale vigilantism targeting religious minorities, with the tacit support
Christians under attack_in_india_report
The document provides a summary of attacks on Christians in India, including two specific incidents in Roorkee and Mau, Uttar Pradesh:
1) In Roorkee, a mob of 250-300 people attacked a church, injuring several attendees. Police did not provide security despite prior complaints.
2) In Mau, a mob accused Christians of conversion during a prayer meeting. Seven people including the pastor were arrested under anti-conversion laws.
It also lists other incidents of threats, violence and false accusations against Christians in various parts of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and other states, indicating growing targeted attacks against the Christian minority in India.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses an application for bail filed by Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. While the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the judge found the evidence linking Imam's speeches to subsequent acts of violence by co-accused to be scanty and inconclusive. The judge granted Imam bail for offenses related to inciting violence but will further examine charges of sedition against Imam.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses a bail application hearing for Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. It notes that while the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the defense argues there is no evidence linking Imam's words to any criminal acts. In its ruling, the court finds the evidence against Imam for abetting offenses to be insufficient and scanty.
Ramesh kumar order
This document summarizes a court case revision petition hearing. The judge stayed the operation of the previous court order from October 12, 2021 until the next hearing date of November 12, 2021. The revision petition notice was ordered to be issued to the respondents. The trial court record was reviewed and the special public prosecutor and police inspector were present to provide submissions.
Cmm order
This document is a court order from a case involving multiple accused persons. It summarizes proceedings from a hearing where the prosecution requested more time for further investigation into the case. The court allowed more time but imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 to be split among the accused, noting delays in the investigation. It also ordered the Secretary of Home Affairs to inquire about responsibility for the costs being imposed and deducting the amount from the responsible officer's salary. The case was adjourned to a future date for further proceedings.
Archbishop --press-statement
The Archbishop of Bangalore expresses concern over the Karnataka government's plan to survey Christian missionaries and places of worship. He argues that such surveys could unfairly target and endanger the Christian community. The Archbishop questions why only Christians are being surveyed, noting that Christians constitute a small percentage of the population. He calls on the government to respect constitutional protections of religious freedom and consider the educational and social services provided by Christian institutions instead of pursuing anti-conversion policies.
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
The complaint alleges that a Muslim family in Indore, Madhya Pradesh was attacked by a mob of 150 people associated with the RSS on October 9, 2021. The family was threatened and told to leave the village. Family members sustained head injuries and their house was ransacked. The police delayed registering an FIR and instead filed a counter-complaint against the family. The complaint cites other recent incidents of violence and harassment against Muslims in Indore and calls on the National Commission for Minorities to investigate and take action to prevent further attacks.
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
The complaint alleges that on October 10, 2021 in Mau, Uttar Pradesh, two incidents occurred where Christian religious gatherings were disrupted by Hindu nationalist mobs. In one incident, two nuns were attacked, dragged to the police station and detained for hours on baseless allegations of religious conversion. In another incident, a Christian prayer service was raided and the pastor and congregants were taken to the police station. The complaint urges the National Commission for Minorities to investigate these attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and pressure authorities to take swift action. It notes a pattern of increasing attacks on Christians in India by Hindu nationalist groups.
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
1. Citizens for Justice and Peace wrote to the National Commission for Minorities regarding two attacks on Christians in Mau, Uttar Pradesh on October 10, 2021. In the first incident, a mob attacked two nuns and their driver at a bus stand and took them to the police station. In the second incident, a mob disrupted a Christian prayer service and took the pastor and worshippers to the police station.
2. The letter requests that the Commission conduct an inquiry into the attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and urge police to take action, and issue guidelines for dealing with communally motivated attacks. It argues that such attacks violate constitutional rights and aim to subjugate minority communities through fear.
Aiufwp eia response (1) converted
The document is a response letter from the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP) regarding the draft EIA Notification 2020. The key points made in the letter are:
1) The AIUFWP demands a complete withdrawal of the draft EIA Notification 2020 as it weakens environmental protections and public participation in decision making.
2) The draft was released during a national lockdown without proper accessibility or consideration of forest communities who will be most impacted.
3) Weakening environmental regulations could exacerbate future pandemics by further damaging nature.
4) The draft favors industries and projects over environmental protection by reducing scrutiny and exempting many from public hearings and consent requirements.
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Maqbool alam order
The document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a bail application filed by Maqbool Alam, who was charged with several offenses including praising a terrorist organization on Facebook. The court heard arguments from Alam's lawyer and the public prosecutor. Upon reviewing the Facebook posts and finding that they did not require further custodial interrogation, the court granted bail to Alam subject to furnishing a bond and ensuring he does not interfere with the investigation.
Kerala hc order d rajagopal-v-ayyappan-anr-402210
This document summarizes two criminal revision petitions filed in the High Court of Kerala against judgments from lower courts. The lower courts had found police officers guilty of assaulting a complainant while he was in custody. The police officers argue on appeal that the lower courts erred in not requiring sanction from the state government before prosecuting public servants. The High Court examines the evidence and finds that the injuries occurred while the complainant was in police custody, supporting his allegation that police assaulted him at the police station lockup. Medical evidence also supports the complainant's version of events. The High Court dismisses the criminal revision petitions filed by the police officers.
Kpss security of kp's - 05.10.2021
The Kashmiri Pandit Sangarash Samiti (KPSS) wrote a letter to the Lieutenant Governor of Jammu and Kashmir regarding the security of non-migrant Kashmiri Pandits and Hindus living in the Kashmir Valley. KPSS has submitted communications over the past year requesting a meeting about this issue, but their requests have been ignored. Over the past 10 days, intelligence reports indicate prominent Kashmiri Pandit/Hindu businessmen will be targeted, and one was killed on October 5th. KPSS warns that if another Pandit/Hindu is killed due to administrative and security failures, they will file a petition with the International Human Rights Commission and launch a signature campaign against the administration for neglect
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
The Central Trade Unions strongly condemned the killing of farmers protesting in Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh. They demanded the resignation of the Minister of State for Home and stringent punishment for the culprits. The trade unions also condemned the police for preventing opposition leaders and union leaders from visiting the families of the deceased. They reiterated their support for farmers in their struggle against the farm laws.
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 1585 2021
This document summarizes a court order from a Public Interest Litigation case in the State of Uttar Pradesh, India. The order lists several related cases to be heard together on October 22nd. It notes that two specific cases were not listed as directed in a previous order and threatens action against the responsible registry officer. It also directs the respondents to provide the petitioner's counsel a copy of the counter affidavit filed in connected writ petitions.
Mp hc wp 9320 2021_order_30-sep-2021
The document discusses two writ petitions related to prison overcrowding and conditions in Madhya Pradesh. It summarizes the suggestions provided by an amicus curiae to improve prison conditions, which include establishing women's prisons, borstal schools for youth offenders, mental health services, vocational training programs, healthcare facilities, sanitation infrastructure, educational opportunities, and recreational activities for inmates. The court acknowledges the urgent need for prison reforms and decongesting the prisons in the state.
More from ZahidManiyar (20)
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Recently uploaded
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75LUMINATIVE MEDIA/PROJECT COUNSEL MEDIA GROUP
From his beginnings with a daily newspaper, he moved easily through Newsweek magazine to cable news and, later, to the frontiers of online journalism.A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022, published here in full for the first time.
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Recently uploaded (8)
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Sc order july 9
- 1. ITEM NO.30 Court 5 (Video Conferencing) SECTION PIL-W S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition (Civil) No.55/2020 PARWAIZ ARIF TITU Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for IA No.5918/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No.16875/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/ FACTS/ANNEXURES and IA No.5917/2020 - STAY APPLICATION) Date : 09-07-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anjum Parvez, Adv. Ms. Nilofar Khan, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Garima Prasad, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra, Adv. Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1 Ms Garima Prasad, Senior AAG appearing on behalf of the respondent-State states that after filing of Petition certain developments have taken place in the form of legislation which has been enacted by the State Legislature, in pursuance of which tribunals have been constituted. To enable the learned counsel to place these developments on affidavit, list the Writ Petition on 23 July 2021. 2 Counter affidavit shall be filed in the meantime. (CHETAN KUMAR) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master Digitally signed by Sanjay Kumar Date: 2021.07.09 16:59:06 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified