21664 2021 33_19_31580_order_26-nov-2021
•
0 likes•103 views
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition filed by Kazeem Ahmad Sherwani against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The Court granted the petitioner's request to serve an advance copy of the petition on the standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh and listed this matter along with another connected writ petition case.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Sc pension order
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by the Uttar Pradesh Ground Water Department Non Gazetted Employee Association against the Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh and others. The Court issued notice on the writ petition and application for stay, returnable in six weeks. It also stayed any recovery in the interim.
Araria case bail order sc aug 4
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Kalyani Badola and another against the State of Bihar regarding their exemption from filing documents and seeking appropriate orders. The petitioners were represented by multiple advocates including Ms. Vrinda Grover and Ms. Shahrukh Alam. The Court issued a notice to the respondents. As an interim order, the Court directed the release of the petitioners on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each until further orders.
Sc thwaha fasal order 09 apr-2021
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a Petition for Special Leave to Appeal. It involves a petitioner named Thwaha Fasal against the Union of India. The court, consisting of Justices Navin Sinha and Ajay Rastogi, heard counsel from both sides. The court then issued a notice returnable in three weeks, with the respondent's counsel Rahul Mishra accepting notice on behalf of the Union of India. The court also directed the respondent to file a counter affidavit in the meantime.
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
This document contains the statement of undisputed facts submitted by the defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment in the case of Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al. It outlines 33 facts regarding the plaintiff's criminal conviction and transfer to a halfway house operated by Dismas Charities, the rules and policies he acknowledged, and his violations of possessing an unauthorized cell phone and driving without permission which led to his transfer back to prison.
83 1
This document provides an undisputed statement of facts in support of a motion for summary judgment. It states that the plaintiff pled guilty to conspiring to illegally export military parts and was sentenced to 35 months, which he served partly at Dismas Charities halfway house. It details the rules plaintiff agreed to, including no unauthorized driving or cell phones. It states that on October 13, 2010 plaintiff drove himself to Dismas and a cell phone was found, violating the rules, so he was returned to prison to complete his sentence.
Sc order apr 9 upadhyay petition
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay against the Union of India and others. Upon hearing from counsel on both sides, the Court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. As a result, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Doc. 113
This document is a reply brief filed by defendants in response to a lawsuit brought by a former inmate, Traian Bujduveanu, against his residential reentry center Dismas Charities and three employees. The defendants argue that Bujduveanu violated terms of his release from federal prison by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone. As a result, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, not the defendants, transferred Bujduveanu back to prison to complete his sentence. The defendants provide 27 undisputed facts with supporting documentation showing Bujduveanu signed forms acknowledging he would abide by rules prohibiting unauthorized driving and cell phone possession. The defendants argue they were not legally responsible for Bu
Sc order love jihad 6.1.2021
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding Writ Petition(s) (Criminal) No(s). 405/2020. It lists the judges present, counsel for the petitioner(s) and respondent(s), and notes that upon hearing from counsel, the court ordered that a notice be issued returnable within four weeks.
Recommended
Sc pension order
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by the Uttar Pradesh Ground Water Department Non Gazetted Employee Association against the Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh and others. The Court issued notice on the writ petition and application for stay, returnable in six weeks. It also stayed any recovery in the interim.
Araria case bail order sc aug 4
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Kalyani Badola and another against the State of Bihar regarding their exemption from filing documents and seeking appropriate orders. The petitioners were represented by multiple advocates including Ms. Vrinda Grover and Ms. Shahrukh Alam. The Court issued a notice to the respondents. As an interim order, the Court directed the release of the petitioners on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each until further orders.
Sc thwaha fasal order 09 apr-2021
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a Petition for Special Leave to Appeal. It involves a petitioner named Thwaha Fasal against the Union of India. The court, consisting of Justices Navin Sinha and Ajay Rastogi, heard counsel from both sides. The court then issued a notice returnable in three weeks, with the respondent's counsel Rahul Mishra accepting notice on behalf of the Union of India. The court also directed the respondent to file a counter affidavit in the meantime.
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
This document contains the statement of undisputed facts submitted by the defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment in the case of Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al. It outlines 33 facts regarding the plaintiff's criminal conviction and transfer to a halfway house operated by Dismas Charities, the rules and policies he acknowledged, and his violations of possessing an unauthorized cell phone and driving without permission which led to his transfer back to prison.
83 1
This document provides an undisputed statement of facts in support of a motion for summary judgment. It states that the plaintiff pled guilty to conspiring to illegally export military parts and was sentenced to 35 months, which he served partly at Dismas Charities halfway house. It details the rules plaintiff agreed to, including no unauthorized driving or cell phones. It states that on October 13, 2010 plaintiff drove himself to Dismas and a cell phone was found, violating the rules, so he was returned to prison to complete his sentence.
Sc order apr 9 upadhyay petition
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay against the Union of India and others. Upon hearing from counsel on both sides, the Court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. As a result, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Doc. 113
This document is a reply brief filed by defendants in response to a lawsuit brought by a former inmate, Traian Bujduveanu, against his residential reentry center Dismas Charities and three employees. The defendants argue that Bujduveanu violated terms of his release from federal prison by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone. As a result, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, not the defendants, transferred Bujduveanu back to prison to complete his sentence. The defendants provide 27 undisputed facts with supporting documentation showing Bujduveanu signed forms acknowledging he would abide by rules prohibiting unauthorized driving and cell phone possession. The defendants argue they were not legally responsible for Bu
Sc order love jihad 6.1.2021
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding Writ Petition(s) (Criminal) No(s). 405/2020. It lists the judges present, counsel for the petitioner(s) and respondent(s), and notes that upon hearing from counsel, the court ordered that a notice be issued returnable within four weeks.
Pb order 25-aug-2020
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding the suo moto contempt petition against Prashant Bhushan and another. It notes that the petition was heard by a bench of three justices. Counsel for both parties were present. After hearing arguments from all sides, the court reserved its judgment.
Supreme Court of India Order dated 21_10_2016 against Writ Petition Criminal ...
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Om Prakash and another against the State of Bihar regarding a criminal case. After hearing from both parties, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition but allowed the petitioners to approach the High Court on the matter.
Doc. 126 1
This document provides the Defendants' response to the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. It includes 11 disputed facts from the Plaintiff's motion. For each fact, the Defendants deny the Plaintiff's version and provide evidence from the affidavit of Ana Gispert supporting their denial. They assert that the Plaintiff violated the rules of his community corrections program by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone. As a result, the Bureau of Prisons transferred the Plaintiff back to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
FCC Permit
This document is a restricted radiotelephone operator permit issued by the Federal Communications Commission to Scott S. Roberts. The permit provides his name, address, file number, serial number, grant date, effective date, expiration date, and states that the permit is not transferable. It also notes standard conditions, including that the permit does not provide any rights beyond its term and cannot be transferred in violation of FCC regulations.
Doc. 126 2
This affidavit was submitted in support of a motion for summary judgment. It was signed by Ana Gispert, the director of the Dismas Charities facility in Hollywood, Florida. The affidavit describes the plaintiff's guilty plea and sentence for conspiring to illegally export military parts to Iran. It details the rules and regulations plaintiff agreed to follow as part of his placement at Dismas Charities halfway house, including prohibitions on unauthorized cell phone use and driving. The affidavit alleges plaintiff violated these rules in October 2010 by driving himself to Dismas Charities and being found in possession of an unauthorized cell phone, leading to his termination from the program and transfer back to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
Affidavit in support of motion for summaryjudgment
This affidavit provides testimony in support of a motion for summary judgment. It summarizes that the plaintiff was residing at Dismas Charities as part of his release from prison. It states that the plaintiff violated rules of his residence by driving a vehicle and possessing a cell phone without authorization. As a result, he received a disciplinary report and his personal items were confiscated, with the cell phone being donated as contraband. The Federal Bureau of Prisons was then notified of the violation.
83 2
This affidavit provides information in support of a motion for summary judgment. It describes the plaintiff's criminal history and sentence, as well as the rules and regulations of the halfway house program where he was residing. The affidavit alleges that the plaintiff violated program rules by driving without authorization and possessing a cell phone, and that he acknowledged being informed of and agreeing to abide by the rules. It also states that the plaintiff was removed from the program and had his remaining sentence served in prison as a result of the violations.
Basic introduction to florida concealed weapons laws
BASIC INFORMATION CONCERNING FLORIDA CONCEALED WEAPONS STATUTES. REFER TO CHAPTER 790 FLORIDA STATUTES FOR MORE INFORMATION.
Sc order 03-mar-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Tahamina Khatun and others against the Union of India and others. The petition was called for hearing before the Chief Justice and two other judges. The court heard from counsel for the petitioner and respondent. The court issued notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks, but provided no interim relief.
Sc guj freedom of rel act order23491 2021 37_4_33358_order_14-feb-2022
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition seeking special leave to appeal against a judgment of the High Court of Gujarat regarding Jamia Ulama-e-Hind Gujarat. The bench issued a notice to the respondents. The petition was filed by the State of Gujarat against the judgment that modified an earlier order related to R/SCA Nos. 10304/2021 and 10305/2021 passed by the High Court of Gujarat. Counsel for the petitioner State of Gujarat and respondents were heard.
M faruqui sc order
The Supreme Court of India was hearing writ petitions and an SLP regarding the arrest of Munawar by the State of Madhya Pradesh. The Court noted that the procedure for arrest under Section 41 of the CrPC was not properly followed and the allegations in the FIR were vague. The Court issued a notice in both petitions, stayed the High Court's judgment, and granted the petitioner ad-interim bail on conditions set by the trial court.
Sc ration card order
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition regarding providing ration to those without ration cards and universalizing the Public Distribution System. The Court noted that this was a policy issue best left to the Government of India and concerned states to consider relief. It directed the petitioners to serve the writ petition on the Solicitor General and disposed of the petition with the observation that the issue was a policy matter for the government.
SC Order_27-Jan-2020.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition filed by T.M.D. Rafi and others against the State of Andhra Pradesh regarding the High Court of Andhra Pradesh's judgment in WP No. 40252/2015 dated September 27, 2019. The Supreme Court issued a notice returnable in six weeks, and stayed the operation of the High Court's impugned judgment until further orders.
SC imposes 25k cost order.pdf
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition. It notes that the petition was called in the mentioning board before Justices Kaul and Oka. The court ordered the petition to be listed on December 5th and for the respondent to file their counter affidavit within two weeks, after which it will only be accepted if Rs. 25,000 costs are deposited with the court. A copy of the order is to be issued to the respondent's counsel.
Sc sedition plea dismissed order 09-feb-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Aditya Ranjan and others against the Union of India and others. After hearing arguments from both sides, the court dismissed the writ petition. All pending interlocutory applications related to the writ petition were also disposed of.
Sc notice nrc order 29 jan-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard two contempt petitions filed by Jamiat Ulama I Hind against Hitesh Dev Sarma and another. The petitioners' counsel stated that the prayer to punish the respondents for contempt of court has been deleted. The court ordered that the petitions will now be treated as interlocutory applications, issued notice to the respondents returnable within four weeks.
Sc order july 9
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the State's counsel informed the Court that new developments have taken place, including new legislation and the constitution of tribunals. The Court directed the State to file an affidavit with details of these new developments and scheduled the next hearing for July 23, 2021. It also ordered the State to file a counter affidavit in the meantime.
Kuwj vs uoi jan 22
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 307/2020 filed by the Kerala Union of Working Journalists versus the Union of India and others. It notes that the matters were called for hearing and lists the lawyers present. The Court then orders, by consent of the parties, to list the matter after six weeks on a non-miscellaneous day.
Whatas app sc order
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a petition for special leave to appeal. It lists the parties involved, their legal counsel, and the orders from the court. The court issued a notice on IA No. 6140/2021, making it returnable in 4 weeks. A reply affidavit may be filed in the meantime by the respondent, and the applicant is permitted to file a rejoinder affidavit.
Sc order 01 mar-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition for special leave to appeal regarding a criminal case in Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner had been in jail since July 2012 and the trial was unlikely to be completed soon. The Supreme Court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the trial court. All pending applications and the special leave petition were disposed of.
Victim right to appeal 14248 2020 35_1503_23651_order_28-aug-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal filed by Parvinder Kansal against the State of NCT of Delhi. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court granted leave to appeal but dismissed the criminal appeal based on a signed non-reportable order placed on the file.
Baljinder sc order 01 sep-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard a special leave petition filed by Inspector Baljinder Singh against the State of Punjab. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court dismissed the special leave petition and refused to entertain it under Article 136 of the Indian Constitution. All pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.
More Related Content
What's hot
Pb order 25-aug-2020
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding the suo moto contempt petition against Prashant Bhushan and another. It notes that the petition was heard by a bench of three justices. Counsel for both parties were present. After hearing arguments from all sides, the court reserved its judgment.
Supreme Court of India Order dated 21_10_2016 against Writ Petition Criminal ...
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Om Prakash and another against the State of Bihar regarding a criminal case. After hearing from both parties, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition but allowed the petitioners to approach the High Court on the matter.
Doc. 126 1
This document provides the Defendants' response to the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. It includes 11 disputed facts from the Plaintiff's motion. For each fact, the Defendants deny the Plaintiff's version and provide evidence from the affidavit of Ana Gispert supporting their denial. They assert that the Plaintiff violated the rules of his community corrections program by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone. As a result, the Bureau of Prisons transferred the Plaintiff back to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
FCC Permit
This document is a restricted radiotelephone operator permit issued by the Federal Communications Commission to Scott S. Roberts. The permit provides his name, address, file number, serial number, grant date, effective date, expiration date, and states that the permit is not transferable. It also notes standard conditions, including that the permit does not provide any rights beyond its term and cannot be transferred in violation of FCC regulations.
Doc. 126 2
This affidavit was submitted in support of a motion for summary judgment. It was signed by Ana Gispert, the director of the Dismas Charities facility in Hollywood, Florida. The affidavit describes the plaintiff's guilty plea and sentence for conspiring to illegally export military parts to Iran. It details the rules and regulations plaintiff agreed to follow as part of his placement at Dismas Charities halfway house, including prohibitions on unauthorized cell phone use and driving. The affidavit alleges plaintiff violated these rules in October 2010 by driving himself to Dismas Charities and being found in possession of an unauthorized cell phone, leading to his termination from the program and transfer back to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
Affidavit in support of motion for summaryjudgment
This affidavit provides testimony in support of a motion for summary judgment. It summarizes that the plaintiff was residing at Dismas Charities as part of his release from prison. It states that the plaintiff violated rules of his residence by driving a vehicle and possessing a cell phone without authorization. As a result, he received a disciplinary report and his personal items were confiscated, with the cell phone being donated as contraband. The Federal Bureau of Prisons was then notified of the violation.
83 2
This affidavit provides information in support of a motion for summary judgment. It describes the plaintiff's criminal history and sentence, as well as the rules and regulations of the halfway house program where he was residing. The affidavit alleges that the plaintiff violated program rules by driving without authorization and possessing a cell phone, and that he acknowledged being informed of and agreeing to abide by the rules. It also states that the plaintiff was removed from the program and had his remaining sentence served in prison as a result of the violations.
Basic introduction to florida concealed weapons laws
BASIC INFORMATION CONCERNING FLORIDA CONCEALED WEAPONS STATUTES. REFER TO CHAPTER 790 FLORIDA STATUTES FOR MORE INFORMATION.
What's hot (8)
Supreme Court of India Order dated 21_10_2016 against Writ Petition Criminal ...
Supreme Court of India Order dated 21_10_2016 against Writ Petition Criminal ...
Affidavit in support of motion for summaryjudgment
Affidavit in support of motion for summaryjudgment
Basic introduction to florida concealed weapons laws
Basic introduction to florida concealed weapons laws
Similar to 21664 2021 33_19_31580_order_26-nov-2021
Sc order 03-mar-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Tahamina Khatun and others against the Union of India and others. The petition was called for hearing before the Chief Justice and two other judges. The court heard from counsel for the petitioner and respondent. The court issued notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks, but provided no interim relief.
Sc guj freedom of rel act order23491 2021 37_4_33358_order_14-feb-2022
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition seeking special leave to appeal against a judgment of the High Court of Gujarat regarding Jamia Ulama-e-Hind Gujarat. The bench issued a notice to the respondents. The petition was filed by the State of Gujarat against the judgment that modified an earlier order related to R/SCA Nos. 10304/2021 and 10305/2021 passed by the High Court of Gujarat. Counsel for the petitioner State of Gujarat and respondents were heard.
M faruqui sc order
The Supreme Court of India was hearing writ petitions and an SLP regarding the arrest of Munawar by the State of Madhya Pradesh. The Court noted that the procedure for arrest under Section 41 of the CrPC was not properly followed and the allegations in the FIR were vague. The Court issued a notice in both petitions, stayed the High Court's judgment, and granted the petitioner ad-interim bail on conditions set by the trial court.
Sc ration card order
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition regarding providing ration to those without ration cards and universalizing the Public Distribution System. The Court noted that this was a policy issue best left to the Government of India and concerned states to consider relief. It directed the petitioners to serve the writ petition on the Solicitor General and disposed of the petition with the observation that the issue was a policy matter for the government.
SC Order_27-Jan-2020.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition filed by T.M.D. Rafi and others against the State of Andhra Pradesh regarding the High Court of Andhra Pradesh's judgment in WP No. 40252/2015 dated September 27, 2019. The Supreme Court issued a notice returnable in six weeks, and stayed the operation of the High Court's impugned judgment until further orders.
SC imposes 25k cost order.pdf
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition. It notes that the petition was called in the mentioning board before Justices Kaul and Oka. The court ordered the petition to be listed on December 5th and for the respondent to file their counter affidavit within two weeks, after which it will only be accepted if Rs. 25,000 costs are deposited with the court. A copy of the order is to be issued to the respondent's counsel.
Sc sedition plea dismissed order 09-feb-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Aditya Ranjan and others against the Union of India and others. After hearing arguments from both sides, the court dismissed the writ petition. All pending interlocutory applications related to the writ petition were also disposed of.
Sc notice nrc order 29 jan-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard two contempt petitions filed by Jamiat Ulama I Hind against Hitesh Dev Sarma and another. The petitioners' counsel stated that the prayer to punish the respondents for contempt of court has been deleted. The court ordered that the petitions will now be treated as interlocutory applications, issued notice to the respondents returnable within four weeks.
Sc order july 9
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the State's counsel informed the Court that new developments have taken place, including new legislation and the constitution of tribunals. The Court directed the State to file an affidavit with details of these new developments and scheduled the next hearing for July 23, 2021. It also ordered the State to file a counter affidavit in the meantime.
Kuwj vs uoi jan 22
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 307/2020 filed by the Kerala Union of Working Journalists versus the Union of India and others. It notes that the matters were called for hearing and lists the lawyers present. The Court then orders, by consent of the parties, to list the matter after six weeks on a non-miscellaneous day.
Whatas app sc order
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a petition for special leave to appeal. It lists the parties involved, their legal counsel, and the orders from the court. The court issued a notice on IA No. 6140/2021, making it returnable in 4 weeks. A reply affidavit may be filed in the meantime by the respondent, and the applicant is permitted to file a rejoinder affidavit.
Sc order 01 mar-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition for special leave to appeal regarding a criminal case in Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner had been in jail since July 2012 and the trial was unlikely to be completed soon. The Supreme Court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the trial court. All pending applications and the special leave petition were disposed of.
Victim right to appeal 14248 2020 35_1503_23651_order_28-aug-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal filed by Parvinder Kansal against the State of NCT of Delhi. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court granted leave to appeal but dismissed the criminal appeal based on a signed non-reportable order placed on the file.
Baljinder sc order 01 sep-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard a special leave petition filed by Inspector Baljinder Singh against the State of Punjab. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court dismissed the special leave petition and refused to entertain it under Article 136 of the Indian Constitution. All pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.
Sc navlakha bail stayed
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a special leave petition filed by the National Investigating Agency against Gautam Navlakha. It notes that the petition was called for hearing. The Court ordered that a notice be issued and that proceedings before the High Court shall remain stayed until further orders. The matter was listed to be heard again after 15 days.
Kuwj vs uoi nov 20
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by the Kerala Union of Working Journalists against the Union of India regarding the admission of various IAs seeking clarification/direction, exemption from filing O.T., and grant of bail. The Solicitor General stated that a counter affidavit had been filed, but the court did not find it on record. The petitioner was allowed to file a rejoinder affidavit. The Solicitor General also stated that advocates can meet accused in jails to take instructions and obtain signatures on vakalatnamas. The matter was listed after one week.
Kuwj vs uoi dec 2
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by the Kerala Union of Working Journalists against the Union of India regarding clarification/direction, exemption from filing O.T., and grant of bail. The Court, comprising of the Chief Justice and two other Justices, heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel Kapil Sibbal and the Solicitor General representing the respondent. The Court ordered the matter to be listed next week and for the respondent to file a reply affidavit in the meantime.
Kee Pharma Supreme Court Order
Kee Pharma Supreme Court Order - http://keepharma.blogspot.com/ - we make it clear that, in case this amount is not deposited along with interest before the Registry of this Court within the stipulated time, the Special Leave Petition will stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
CBZ Chemicals LTD, UK
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a special leave petition filed by Kee Pharma Ltd against an order of the High Court of Delhi. It summarizes that Kee Pharma's counsel requested an extension of three months to deposit the amount mentioned in the High Court order, including 8% annual interest, to stay the winding up process and appointment of a provisional liquidator. The Supreme Court granted the stay on these conditions, stating that if the amount is not deposited on time, the special leave petition will be dismissed without further reference.
Kee Pharma vs CBZ Chemicals Ltd, UK
CBZ Chemicals Ltd, UK - https://keepharmaltd.tumblr.com/ - Kee Pharma Ltd vs Cbz Chemicals Ltd Supreme Court Orders on 29 January, 2018.
Similar to 21664 2021 33_19_31580_order_26-nov-2021 (20)
Sc guj freedom of rel act order23491 2021 37_4_33358_order_14-feb-2022
Sc guj freedom of rel act order23491 2021 37_4_33358_order_14-feb-2022
Victim right to appeal 14248 2020 35_1503_23651_order_28-aug-2020
Victim right to appeal 14248 2020 35_1503_23651_order_28-aug-2020
Recently uploaded
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022, published here in full for the first time.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75LUMINATIVE MEDIA/PROJECT COUNSEL MEDIA GROUP
From his beginnings with a daily newspaper, he moved easily through Newsweek magazine to cable news and, later, to the frontiers of online journalism.Recently uploaded (8)
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
21664 2021 33_19_31580_order_26-nov-2021
- 1. ITEM NO.19 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 391/2021 KAZEEM AHMAD SHERWANI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.118374/2021-EX-PARTE AD-INTERIM RELIEF and IA No.118376/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.118377/2021- EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ) Date : 26-11-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr Huzefa A Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Ms Shahrukh Alam, Adv. Mr Talha Abdul Rahman, Adv. Ms Warisha Farasat, Adv. Mr Harsh Vardhan Kediya, Adv. Mr M Shaz Khan, Adv. Ms Rashmi Singh, Adv. Mr Shourya Dasgupta, Adv. Ms Tamanna Pankaj, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed, liberty is granted to the petitioner to serve the advance copy of the petition on the standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh. List this matter along with Writ Petition (C) No.799 of 2020 and connected cases. (NEETU KHAJURIA) COURT MASTER (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER Digitally signed by NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2021.11.27 12:30:24 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified