This document discusses how Johns Hopkins Home Care Group (JHHCG) has built a culture of safety over 10 years. Key aspects of their culture include transparency, trust, empowering staff to report issues without fear of punishment, collaboration, learning from mistakes, and involving patients. JHHCG uses tools like checklists, safety rounds, training, and collaborating with hospital staff to continuously improve safety. Their focus on specialization, communication, and educating providers has strengthened relationships and avoided errors.
Patient Safety: Evolving from Compliance to Cultureclinicalsolutions
Patient Safety, evolving from Compliance to Culture with McKesson http://www.mckesson.com/static_files/McKesson.com/MPT/Documents/PatientSafety_WHT260.pdf
Hospitals are charged with the dual task of keeping patients well while also keeping patients safe. The two are inextricably linked, as patient safety concerns often tie directly into patient health concerns — hand hygiene, transitions of care and medication errors are a few such concerns that come to mind.Looking prospectively, these concerns, and many others, will flow into the next calendar year. Some of the patient safety issues are long established, and will remain in the forefront of healthcare's mind for years to come. Here, in no particular order, are 10 important patient safety issues for providers to consider in the upcoming year.
The complexities of your role as a healthcare leader cannot be overstated. In fact, each year the complexity increases as the weight of administrative tasks increases, meeting patient needs becomes harder, and the overall healthcare environment rapidly shifts.
These, and other, frustrations are widespread and expanding, leading to growing levels of burnout. The symptoms of burnout are varied and complicated, but often include a state of emotional exhaustion, an increase in detachment, and a decrease in productivity. Research shows burnout has negative effects on healthcare systems and ultimately the quality of patient care.1 Moreover, it impacts the health of clinicians and contributes to the loss of practicing physicians.
Patient Safety: Evolving from Compliance to Cultureclinicalsolutions
Patient Safety, evolving from Compliance to Culture with McKesson http://www.mckesson.com/static_files/McKesson.com/MPT/Documents/PatientSafety_WHT260.pdf
Hospitals are charged with the dual task of keeping patients well while also keeping patients safe. The two are inextricably linked, as patient safety concerns often tie directly into patient health concerns — hand hygiene, transitions of care and medication errors are a few such concerns that come to mind.Looking prospectively, these concerns, and many others, will flow into the next calendar year. Some of the patient safety issues are long established, and will remain in the forefront of healthcare's mind for years to come. Here, in no particular order, are 10 important patient safety issues for providers to consider in the upcoming year.
The complexities of your role as a healthcare leader cannot be overstated. In fact, each year the complexity increases as the weight of administrative tasks increases, meeting patient needs becomes harder, and the overall healthcare environment rapidly shifts.
These, and other, frustrations are widespread and expanding, leading to growing levels of burnout. The symptoms of burnout are varied and complicated, but often include a state of emotional exhaustion, an increase in detachment, and a decrease in productivity. Research shows burnout has negative effects on healthcare systems and ultimately the quality of patient care.1 Moreover, it impacts the health of clinicians and contributes to the loss of practicing physicians.
What is possible in a hospital getting to zero harm cincinati childrens story...Proqualis
Apresentação de Stephen Muething durante o SIMPÓSIO EINSTEIN-IHI: Implantação e Disseminação de Programas de Segurança do Paciente aconteceu de 3 a 5 de novembro de 2013, em São Paulo - Brasil.
At least one in every 20 adults who seeks medical care in a U.S. emergency room or community health clinic may walk away with the wrong diagnosis, according to a new analysis that estimates that 12 million Americans a year could be affected by such errors.
Experts have often downplayed the scope of diagnostic errors not because they were unaware of the problem, but “because they were afraid to open up a can of worms they couldn't close.
A pivotal trademark of evolution is the ability to adapt to the environment for survival. The health care industry, as a living system, is not immune to the effects of an ever-changing environment. Present environmental concerns affecting health care organizations include government policy, advances in technology, the need for stable finances, and patient/public perceptions of health care quality. Any one or all of these conditions could thwart the continued existence of a health care facility. A primary approach to adapting to the environment for health organizations is in the adoption of electronic health records. The benefits of electronic records could also pose risk to viability, due to the potential for fraud, theft, and abuse of data by both external and internal forces. Despite these risks, the benefits of electronic health systems, if used properly, can contribute to financial stability, employee retention, quality patient care, and patient satisfaction. As the environment continues to change, so will the demands upon the health care industry, ensuring continuous change in methods, as true and total development (apotheosis) can never be achieved.
This presentation from the 2014 ASHRM Conference analyzes the legal, regulatory and clinical risks related to meaningful consent and offers ways to mitigate them.
To recognize The National Patient Safety Foundation's Patient Safety Awareness Week #PSAW2015 we asked our colleagues in the Harvard medical community to complete this sentence: "Patient safety is..."
Here are some of their responses.
What is possible in a hospital getting to zero harm cincinati childrens story...Proqualis
Apresentação de Stephen Muething durante o SIMPÓSIO EINSTEIN-IHI: Implantação e Disseminação de Programas de Segurança do Paciente aconteceu de 3 a 5 de novembro de 2013, em São Paulo - Brasil.
At least one in every 20 adults who seeks medical care in a U.S. emergency room or community health clinic may walk away with the wrong diagnosis, according to a new analysis that estimates that 12 million Americans a year could be affected by such errors.
Experts have often downplayed the scope of diagnostic errors not because they were unaware of the problem, but “because they were afraid to open up a can of worms they couldn't close.
A pivotal trademark of evolution is the ability to adapt to the environment for survival. The health care industry, as a living system, is not immune to the effects of an ever-changing environment. Present environmental concerns affecting health care organizations include government policy, advances in technology, the need for stable finances, and patient/public perceptions of health care quality. Any one or all of these conditions could thwart the continued existence of a health care facility. A primary approach to adapting to the environment for health organizations is in the adoption of electronic health records. The benefits of electronic records could also pose risk to viability, due to the potential for fraud, theft, and abuse of data by both external and internal forces. Despite these risks, the benefits of electronic health systems, if used properly, can contribute to financial stability, employee retention, quality patient care, and patient satisfaction. As the environment continues to change, so will the demands upon the health care industry, ensuring continuous change in methods, as true and total development (apotheosis) can never be achieved.
This presentation from the 2014 ASHRM Conference analyzes the legal, regulatory and clinical risks related to meaningful consent and offers ways to mitigate them.
To recognize The National Patient Safety Foundation's Patient Safety Awareness Week #PSAW2015 we asked our colleagues in the Harvard medical community to complete this sentence: "Patient safety is..."
Here are some of their responses.
Patient Safety: Evolving from Compliance to Cultureclinicalsolutions
Patient Safety, evolving from Compliance to Culture with McKesson http://www.mckesson.com/static_files/McKesson.com/MPT/Documents/PatientSafety_WHT260.pdf
Patient Safety: Evolving from Compliance to Cultureclinicalsolutions
Patient Safety, evolving from Compliance to Culture with McKesson http://www.mckesson.com/static_files/McKesson.com/MPT/Documents/PatientSafety_WHT260.pdf
Patient Safety: Evolving from Compliance to Cultureclinicalsolutions
Patient Safety, evolving from Compliance to Culture with McKesson http://www.mckesson.com/static_files/McKesson.com/MPT/Documents/PatientSafety_WHT260.pdf
Patient Safety: Evolving from Compliance to Cultureclinicalsolutions
Patient Safety, evolving from Compliance to Culture with McKesson http://www.mckesson.com/static_files/McKesson.com/MPT/Documents/PatientSafety_WHT260.pdf
Patient Safety: Evolving from Compliance to Cultureclinicalsolutions
Patient Safety, evolving from Compliance to Culture with McKesson http://www.mckesson.com/static_files/McKesson.com/MPT/Documents/PatientSafety_WHT260.pdf
Closing the Gap Toward a Culture of Safetycourtemanche
In its landmark 1999 publication, To Err Is Human, the Institute of Medicine defined patient safety as “freedom from accidental injury.” In 1999, estimated deaths from medical errors in United States hospitals were 98,000 per year thus the expectation to be free from accidental injury was more than a reasonable expectation for those accessing the health care system.
Simple and Safe Approaches Towards Patient SafetyEhi Iden
A conference presentation on simple approaches and steps in achieving and managing patient safety in health. It talks about team approach, mutual support, just system, leadership commitment, complications of blame game and case study of the popular Kimberly Hiatt story.
Nephrology Nursing Journal September-October 2014 Vol. 41, No. 5 447
Patient Safety and Patient Safety
Culture: Foundations of Excellent
Health Care Delivery
Primum non nocere. First do no harm.
Patient safety forms the founda-tion of healthcare delivery justas biological, physiological,and safety needs form the
foundation of Maslow’s hierarchy
(Maslow, 1954). Little else can be
accomplished if the patient does not
feel safe or is, in fact, not safe. But the
healthcare system is extremely com-
plex, and ensuring patient safety
requires the ongoing, focused efforts
of every member of the healthcare
team.
Patient safety moved to the fore-
front in health care with the release in
1999 of the Institute of Medicine (IOM)
landmark report, To Err is Human:
Building a Safer Health System, which
estimated that annually in the United
States, up to one million people were
injured and 98,000 died as a result of
medical errors (IOM, 2000). The re -
port caught the attention of the media,
and there were headlines across the
nation about the safety (or lack of safe-
ty) for patients in healthcare organiza-
tions. In 2013, James updated the esti-
mate of patient harms associated with
Beth Ulrich
Tamara Kear
Continuing Nursing
Education
Beth Ulrich, EdD, RN, FACHE, FAAN, is
Editor, the Nephrology Nursing Journal, and a
Professor, the University of Texas Health Science
Center at Houston School of Nursing. She is a Past
President of ANNA and a member of ANNA’s
Sand Dollar Chapter. She may be contacted direct-
ly via email at [email protected]
Tamara Kear, PhD, RN, CNS, CNN, is an
Assistant Professor of Nursing, Villanova
University, Villanova, PA, and a Nephrology
Nurse, Liberty Dialysis. She is on the Editorial
Board for the Nephrology Nursing Journal,
serves as the ANNA Research Committee chairper-
son, and is a member of ANNA’s Keystone Chapter.
Statements of Disclosure: Please refer to page
457.
Note: Additional statements of disclosure and
instructions for CNE evaluation can be found on
page 457.
This offering for 1.4 contact hours is provided by the American Nephrology Nurses’
Association (ANNA).
American Nephrology Nurses’ Association is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing
education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center Commission on Accreditation.
ANNA is a provider approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, provider number
CEP 00910.
This CNE article meets the Nephrology Nursing Certification Commission’s (NNCC’s) continu-
ing nursing education requirements for certification and recertification.
Copyright 2014 American Nephrology Nurses’ Association
Ulrich, B., & Kear, T. (2014). Patient safety and patient safety culture: Foundations of ex -
cellent health care delivery. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 41(5), 447-456, 505.
In 1999, patient safety moved to the forefront of health care based upon astonishing sta-
tistics and a landmark report released by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). This report,
To Err.
Call for a standard framework for clinical risk management program to ensure ...Ruby Med Plus
Globally, the patient safety movement got focused in risk management by the publication of “To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System”, in 1999, which articulated the findings of a study of Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the devastating consequences of widespread medical error in the hospitals in USA. In addition to the unfortunate health consequences of medical error, there are direct and indirect costs borne by society as a whole. Patient Safety is the fundamental of the health care system. If care is not provided in a safe manner in a safe environment, the chances for a good outcome are lessened significantly.
As, Institute of Medicine (IOM) noted, “Patients should not be harmed by the care that is intended to help them, nor should harm come to those who work in health care.” The goal of risk management in health care must be to prevent harm from reaching patients and those involved in providing care to those patients and the place where the care is being provided . The aim of Clinical Risk Management is to improve both the safety and quality of care for patients and to reduce the costs of such risks for health care providers ” Hence, the Clinical Risk Management program needs a standard framework to fulfill this objective of Clinical Risk Management in clinical Dentistry. It gives the realization to the Dentist / Dental Team that fallibility is part of the human condition and human condition can’t be changed, but the conditions under which people work can be changed. That explains the need of Clinical Risk Management in Dentistry.
Running head McVeigh– Defensive Medicine Essay 1 1 .docxcowinhelen
Running head: McVeigh– Defensive Medicine Essay 1
1
It has been said that the fear of medical liability drives healthcare providers, particularly
physicians, to unnecessarily order diagnostic tests and to perform treatments and procedures
that may not be necessary, simply to ensure that nothing is left undone. Is this in fact the case?
Defend position on this premise using literature.
Langley McVeigh, MHA, FACHE
May 23, 2017
McVeigh - Defensive Medicine 2
Yes, defensive medicine is practiced in the United States. However, it is important to
understand: (1) what impact it has on healthcare expenditures (2) to what degree does it occur
(prevalence) and (3) if so, what can be done to prevent it?
As an emergency services administrator for a Level 1 trauma center, experience has led
me to understand the dynamic influencing physicians in their clinical decision making process.
Ideally, this process should be void of non-clinical bias or influence. However, this is not the
case in many circumstances. Physicians are considering risk and liability when ordering tests
and procedures. This risk management, or risk mis-management, phenomenon is called
defensive medicine. By definition, these occurrences are medical practices intended to
exonerate practitioners from liability with limited or without medical benefit to the patient
(Sethi et al, 2012). Physicians have been directed by health policy to provide value based care,
but defensive medicine practice works against this care model.
There have been studies conducted measuring physician attitudes towards tort reform
and defensive medicine practices. While studies show physicians, especially high risk medical
specialists, regularly practicing defensive medicine, the cost implications are unclear.
Furthermore, proposed reforms to the medical tort system must be investigated. Some have
proposed to completely do away with the medical tort litigation and insurance system,
replacing it with a system similar to workman’s compensation models. While it may be a reflex
mechanism to use cost as a metric to measure results of defensive medicine practices, patient
outcomes and quality of life implications must also be measured. The patient is the one who is
being subjected to additional and unwarranted procedures.
McVeigh - Defensive Medicince 3
According to a survey of 2000 orthopedic surgeons in 2010 (Sethi et al, 2012), of the
1214 respondents, 96% admitted to have practiced defensive medicine by ordering labs,
imaging studies, specialist referrals, and inpatient admissions. Many surgeons confided this was
done to avoid malpractice claims. These prescriptions offered little no benefit to patient
outcomes, and contrary to the current posture of value based practice in our health care
system. This additional intervention is costly, at an inconvenience to the patient, and may carry
additional health risk. As a reflex, one may think of ...
Health care consumers benefit from understanding some of the issues involved in providing them with the best care, and some things they can do themselves to prepare for and learn about these issues. Doctors, nurses, and other health professionals dedicate their lives to caring for their patients. But providing health care can be complicated.
10Patient Safety Culture in hospitals.Student’s NameCoBenitoSumpter862
10
Patient Safety Culture in hospitals.
Student’s Name
Course
Instructor’s name.
Institutional Affiliation
September 24, 2021.
Patient Safety Culture in hospitals.
Introduction.
Patient safety is an issue of global public health concern. It refers to preventing patients from harm by implementing a care system that contains errors and learns from medical errors to build a safety culture involving healthcare workers, patients, and healthcare organizations. The safety of patients is critical in care quality. Many patients worldwide have suffered injuries, disabilities, and death due to medical errors or unsafe care. Patient safety culture can be defined as healthcare organizations' values about what is essential and how to operate to protect patients. To achieve a safe culture, organizations and their members must understand the values, norms, and beliefs about essential and attitudes and behaviors related to patient safety (Ali et al., 2018).
To achieve a culture of safety, organizations should emphasize addressing disparities in the quality of care because the current challenges may worsen the efforts to narrow the gap. The key issues in establishing and providing accessible, responsive, and effective health systems are quality and safety. Poor quality and unsafe patient care increase mortality and morbidity rates throughout the world. About 75% of the healthcare delivery gaps are preventable, and approximately 10% of inpatient admission result from preventable patient harm (Amiri et al., 2018).
Patient safety cultures with strong collaboration and leadership drive and prioritize safety (Wu et al., 2019). Strong leadership and commitment from manger are essential because their attitudes and actions influence the wider workforce's behaviors, perceptions, and attitudes. The other important aspects of patient safety culture include; effective communication, mutual trust, shared views on the importance of patient safety, engaging the healthcare workforce, acknowledging mistakes, and having a system that recognizes, responds, and gives feedback on adverse events (Alquwez et al., 2018). Patient safety culture is influenced by burnouts, hospital characteristics, communication, position, work area, commitment to the patient safety program, leadership, and patient safety resources and management.
Thesis statement.
Patient safety culture focuses on safety in health care by emphasizing the prevention, reporting, and investigation of medical errors that may cause patients' adverse effects, thus reducing harm by implementing necessary measures. Several factors are affecting the culture of patient safety in hospitals. This paper highlights patient safety culture and the factors affecting patient safety culture in public hospitals.
Body.
Patient safety culture encompasses shared values and beliefs about healthcare delivery system, training and education of healthcare workers on patient safety culture, commitment from leaders and managers, ope ...
10Patient Safety Culture in hospitals.Student’s NameCoSantosConleyha
10
Patient Safety Culture in hospitals.
Student’s Name
Course
Instructor’s name.
Institutional Affiliation
September 24, 2021.
Patient Safety Culture in hospitals.
Introduction.
Patient safety is an issue of global public health concern. It refers to preventing patients from harm by implementing a care system that contains errors and learns from medical errors to build a safety culture involving healthcare workers, patients, and healthcare organizations. The safety of patients is critical in care quality. Many patients worldwide have suffered injuries, disabilities, and death due to medical errors or unsafe care. Patient safety culture can be defined as healthcare organizations' values about what is essential and how to operate to protect patients. To achieve a safe culture, organizations and their members must understand the values, norms, and beliefs about essential and attitudes and behaviors related to patient safety (Ali et al., 2018).
To achieve a culture of safety, organizations should emphasize addressing disparities in the quality of care because the current challenges may worsen the efforts to narrow the gap. The key issues in establishing and providing accessible, responsive, and effective health systems are quality and safety. Poor quality and unsafe patient care increase mortality and morbidity rates throughout the world. About 75% of the healthcare delivery gaps are preventable, and approximately 10% of inpatient admission result from preventable patient harm (Amiri et al., 2018).
Patient safety cultures with strong collaboration and leadership drive and prioritize safety (Wu et al., 2019). Strong leadership and commitment from manger are essential because their attitudes and actions influence the wider workforce's behaviors, perceptions, and attitudes. The other important aspects of patient safety culture include; effective communication, mutual trust, shared views on the importance of patient safety, engaging the healthcare workforce, acknowledging mistakes, and having a system that recognizes, responds, and gives feedback on adverse events (Alquwez et al., 2018). Patient safety culture is influenced by burnouts, hospital characteristics, communication, position, work area, commitment to the patient safety program, leadership, and patient safety resources and management.
Thesis statement.
Patient safety culture focuses on safety in health care by emphasizing the prevention, reporting, and investigation of medical errors that may cause patients' adverse effects, thus reducing harm by implementing necessary measures. Several factors are affecting the culture of patient safety in hospitals. This paper highlights patient safety culture and the factors affecting patient safety culture in public hospitals.
Body.
Patient safety culture encompasses shared values and beliefs about healthcare delivery system, training and education of healthcare workers on patient safety culture, commitment from leaders and managers, ope ...
10Patient Safety Culture in hospitals.Student’s NameCo
Safety-MarApr13_FINAL
1. 30
MARCH/APRIL2013
Just as Rome was not built in a day, the culture of
any one health care provider doesn’t spring up
overnight. Over time, several forces—from per
sonal attitudes to management style—shape a
unique set of mores that affect behavior. Yet, when
it comes to safety, behavior is the primary difference
maker. Different actions can bring about radically
diverse outcomes.
While there is much to learn about promoting patient
and workplace safety, health care in general has done a
poor job of implementing what it already knows. This
was made astonishingly clear in the Institute of
Medicine’s (IOM) groundbreaking report, “To Err is
Human,” as well as in multiple subsequent research
studies. IOM first pegged the price of preventable med
ical errors at 44,000 to 98,000 lives per year and $17 to
$29 billion per year.1
A few years later, the U.S. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) made us fear
we’d only seen the tip of the iceberg when it reported
that health careassociated infections (HAI) alone were
responsible for the deaths of nearly 99,000 patients per
year.2
Regardless, the data reveal a tremendous gap
Weaving Safety into Everyday Practice
How One Provider is Building a Culture of Safety in its Practice
By Jeannie Counce
2. MARCH/APRIL2013
31
between known best practice and the ability to actually
deliver that care to patients.
Culture Clash No More
To get a handle on how safety can be improved in
health care, researchers studied highreliability organi
zations, which are considered to operate with nearly
failurefree performance. The most commonly cited
examples are air traffic control systems, nuclear power
plants, and naval aircraft carriers—which, like health
care, are highrisk, highconsequence endeavors.
Detailed case studies identified common features asso
ciated with substantial improvements in their safety
records; chief among them is a culture of safety.3
What is a culture of safety? Definitions abound, but
essentially a culture of safety involves commitment
and participation at all levels. Organizations with
advanced safety cultures develop ways to detect
unexpected threats and contain them before they
cause harm—or bounce back when they fail. They are
attentive to issues facing workers on the frontline and
involve them in root cause analysis of safety breaches
as well as in organizational decisionmaking. And, all
individuals have a sense of autonomy to act when a sit
uation does not “feel right” and are encouraged to
report potential hazards and errors as part of an ongo
ing improvement process.3
In many ways culture is the key to reducing medical
errors and complications—which can, in turn, pre
vent injury, death, and unnecessary costs to the
health care system. Providers know that simple
steps like hand washing prevent the spread of infec
tion and reduce complications. Yet, research has
shown that health care providers adhere to national
guidelines for hand hygiene less than 50% of the
time.4
In a culture of safety, the workplace embraces
operational change—like the issuing of hand washing
guidelines—effectively and consistently incorporat
ing it into everyday practice.
Bringing the Culture to the
Alternate-Site
There’s an abundance of research on patient safety ini
tiatives, but as is typically the case, the majority of them
are in the acute care setting. As part of an academic,
integrated health system, Baltimorebased Johns
Hopkins Home Care Group (JHHCG) provides an excel
lent case study that relates directly to the alternatesite
infusion field. Working with Johns Hopkins Medicine, a
pioneer in patient safety research and innovation,
JHCCG has a unique perspective on the benefits of safe
ty and quality to both patients and workers, as well as a
decade of experience cultivating a culture of safety (see
box for history).
“Safety is interwoven in everyday practice, not lay
ered on top,” says Mary Myers, Vice President and
COO of JHHCG. While this may be a foundational prin
ciple in a culture of safety, it doesn’t happen
overnight, she adds. “Eight to 10 years ago we were at
the infant stage. We have come a long way, but we’re
still growing.”
Getting there is a continuous process that requires
several ingredients (see Exhibit 1). “Trust and trans
parency are vital,” observes Myers. “Our team has to
know that it’s okay to report issues without being afraid
that they will ‘get in trouble.’”
Establishing this type of trust is a culture change,
points out Linda Beckett, Infusion Production
Technician. While Beckett and most of her teammates
feel comfortable self reporting, newer employees are
more hesitant at first. “We had a pharmacy employee
catch an error when a prescription came back for refill,”
recalls Beckett. The employee couldn’t believe how our
process worked compared to their former employer,
History of Safety at Johns
Hopkins
In 2002, following two tragic and highly publicized
lapses in patient safety, Johns Hopkins Medicine set a
goal of making its care the safest in the world.
Central to that effort was the creation of a Center for
Innovation in Quality Patient Care to spur advances in
quality and patient safety. Through research and col
laboration, the center developed a set of customiz
able tools and resources to help frontline clinicians
identify and mitigate hazards to quality patient care.
The most widely publicized example is the
Comprehensive UnitBased Safety Program (CUSP),
which emphasizes a systematic, teambased
approach to quality improvement work. By imple
menting this model along with other evidencebased
interventions, Hopkins was able to reduce its rate of
central line–associated bloodstream infections
(CLABSIs) in surgical intensive care units by 75100%
from 2001 to 2010.5
Other units employing CUSP also
have experienced improved staff morale and lower
nursing turnover. The model has been disseminated
to hospitals nationwide, and in intensive care units in
Michigan hospitals it was associated with a sustained
66% reduction in CLABSIs.6
The center later merged with the Quality and
Research Safety Group, led by Peter Pronovost, M.D.,
to become the Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety
and Quality. The Institute provides an infrastructure
that oversees, coordinates, and supports patient
safety and quality efforts across Johns Hopkins’ inte
grated health care system and shares tools and
expertise with other health care providers.
3. 32
MARCH/APRIL2013
who would have fired them on the spot. Instead, the
employee was rewarded for coming forward and
became an integral part of the solution.”
Removing the penalties from self reporting builds
trust. It also encourages further reporting—another
key ingredient, according to Myers. “We want to
encourage reporting. Our team knows that if some
thing doesn’t feel right, doesn’t sound right, doesn’t
look right, it probably isn’t right. We’re counting on
everyone to trust their instincts and speak up when
they suspect safety could be compromised,” she says.
This recently played out when Nancy England,
Infusion Clinical Technician, was reviewing a list of
patient supply needs. “I noticed that one patient was
requesting a lot more flushes than they should need to
administer their therapy,” she recalls. “It didn’t feel
right, so I checked with the patient, involved the phar
macists and it turned out the patient’s physician was
supplying additional medication—the reason for the
extra flushes—that wasn’t compatible with the therapy
we were supplying.”
Errors, near misses, and practices that could con
tribute to mistakes are all important springboards for
improvement. “We reward the identification of issues
because we can learn from them,” says Myers. “When
a mistake is made, part of the solution is performing a
Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and creating a risk reduction
strategy. Errors are most often system issues, not peo
ple issues, so this model is effective.”
“Usually things we identify result in performance
improvement projects,” explains Beckett. In one exam
ple, a review of the “predelivery error log” revealed
that two saline solutions with different volumes were
placed next to each other in the supply area. Their
proximity increased the chances of error in stocking
and/or use in compounding.
Having the Tools to Act
While reacting appropriately and learning from safety
issues is critical, JHHCG strives to be more than just
reactive when it comes safety, according to Myers.
“We conduct Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
and other activities that are proactive.”
In one example the team conducted a FEMA on infu
sion pump programming. “We realized that there are
60 different steps involved—multiplied by the number
of hands touching the pumps,” recalls David Hirsch,
R.N., Nurse Manager for Adult Services. “We then cal
culated the number of possible mistakes and severity of
each one and came up with a prioritized list of items for
improvement.” The list is implemented one step at a
time and the results are carefully measured.
“You can’t make a whole bunch of changes at once,
because you won’t know which was effective,” points
out Krista Decker, R.Ph., Medication Safety Officer.
“We use quality improvement (QI) tools like ‘PlanDo
Exhibit 1
Cultivating a Culture of
Safety
Necessary Ingredients
Trust
Transparency
Proactive
Nonpunitive, “just culture” where employees aren’t
culpable for honest mistakes
Collaborative
Empowers autonomous action
Interdisciplinary in nature
Ability to learn from defects
Action Steps
Create a formal program
Demonstrate how safety supports the organization’s
mission
Consider safety of patient, employee, and environment
Provide tools and training
Involve patients and caregivers
Set expectations
Encourage team members to trust their instincts
Conduct safety rounds
Reward identification of issues (including self reporting)
Communicate adverse events
Conduct root cause analyses when mistakes are made
Identify trends
Close the loop whenever possible
Measure (attitudes toward safety, patient and
employee satisfaction, progress)
Use dashboards to monitor progress
Learn from others and share your knowledge
Remember that you can ALWAYS improve
4. MARCH/APRIL2013
33
CheckAct,’ (PDCA) and look at the data so we can see
what is improving and by how much.”
While QI theory factors heavily into their work, the
team acquires knowledge along the way. “Mary has
background in quality, which is a significant advan
tage,” notes Mitra Gavgani, Pharm.D., Director of
Pharmaquip Infusion Services for JHHCG. “She
appreciates the tools and encourages all the staff—
not just managers—to take part in training and par
ticipate in forums like our Quality Safety Council.”
The council, which is open to all employees, identifies
the issues that the team will address each year and
writes a plan on how to achieve its goals. Included in
the plan is an assessment of the various tools they’ll
need to get there, which in turn, determines the
training schedule.
“We send our team members to learning events and
tap into the resources at the Armstrong Institute,”
explains Myers. “We have adapted many of their hos
pital initiatives to our mobile workforce.”
In addition to training, system improvements involve
arming staff with the basic tools to do the job, says Fred
Choy, R.Ph., Infusion Pharmacy Manager. “That means
access to the hospital computer to see patients’ electron
ic medical records, the ability to research critical informa
tion like drug data, and communicate in real time.” JHHCG
provides the tools its staff needs, including smart phones
with apps and programs like drug libraries for reference,
and the ability to text each other in real time.
Access to tools and resources is advantageous, but
not mandatory for success, points out Gavgani. “No
tools will help you if you are not willing to listen,” she
asserts. “It doesn’t take a lot of money to open your
ears and listen to what your staff has to offer—they are
your best consultant.”
Listening to the Consultants
In the 10 years that JHHCG has been working to improve
safety, it has adopted a number of practices based on
the wisdom of its team. The organization’s clinical
teams specialize by disease state, which allows them to
stay more focused and to be very knowledgeable about
the latest treatment protocols, according to Gavgani.
“For example, there is a pharmacist and a pharmacy
technician dedicated solely to pediatrics. Adults are
divided by the disease state,” she explains. “One team
is dedicated to oncology and pain patients, which pro
vides important continuity for patients experiencing
extreme pain due to their treatment or in cases where
they transition to hospice.”
“We also have fre
quent huddles
throughout the day to
address issues as they come
up,” says Beckett. “We had
one today about
chemotherapy
and priming
tubing, and
we’ve had
many over the
past year or so on
the drug shortages.”
The team has creat
ed its own checklists
built on evidencebased
practices. “The checklists
help us maintain consistency
and minimize risk of error,”
observes Myers. “We have them for
predelivery, home administration of
drugs, dressing changes, line care and hand wash
ing.”
They also conduct safety rounds, where teams walk
through their daily operations to see where they might
prevent injuries. “We are always asking, ‘How could we
hurt a patient? Where is the next error coming from?’”
explains Myers, who often performs her own executive
rounds, going on home visits with nurses and sitting
with customer service representatives in the phone
center to examine work practices and solicit feedback.
Similarly, there’s a Home Observation Program,
where a staff member, who is not involved in caring
for a specific patient, observes a patient visit in the
home and reviews the events with the clinician, com
municating opportunities for improvement. The team
conducts frequent case reviews in staff meetings.
When patient care issues are identified, the review can
sometimes lead back inside the hospital system to the
department where the problem originated. The team
also works proactively with physicians when they see a
potential problem with an order—they’ll stop it and go
back to explain where the safety issue is and how it
could be improved.
“This culture goes across the system—everyone is col
laborative and respectful,” interjects Susan Martin, Senior
Director of Contracting and Business Development. “Our
team offers a ‘home care 101’ session to physicians and
other referral sources on the system’s hospital side to
teach them what’s needed for safe discharge and show
5. 34
MARCH/APRIL2013
them what the home environment is like.”
That type of education pays off many times, accord
ing to Martin. Since Hopkins is an academic medical
center, the physicians coming out of the system are
well versed in infusion and more open to collaborating
with their home care partners. “They often call to
access our clinicians’ expertise, like asking for recom
mendations on PICC lines or to develop safe plans to
transition patients from the hospital to home infusion,”
she says.
JHHCG’s collaborative nature extends into the com
munity as well. Gavgani says that the team will also edu
cate physicians and referral sources outside the system
on potential errors coming from their practices. “They
usually start off thinking ‘Who are you to question me?’
but eventually they understand we are not pointing fin
gers, we are working for the patient,” she observes.
Advocating for the patient—and turning wouldbe
errors into near misses—has built relationships and
earned JHHCG loyalty from many of its referral sources.
“There was one infectious disease group that was not
very open to change at first,” recalls Gavgani, “but they
saw the benefits to the patients and the errors that
were avoided by our pharmacist and now they insist on
using us.”
Patient Involvement
Involving patients and caregivers is another key ingredi
ent in a culture of safety. As with the employee culture,
trust is an essential element in patient care. “As field
clinicians we develop a relationship with the patient and
the family,” explains Hirsch. “We want to make them
feel confident and involved.” To do that, Hirsch and the
other clinicians review the medication order, show
them the medication and supplies, and perform a return
demonstration using teachback technique.
“We involve the family in the Five R’s checklist,” he
continues, referring to the “right medication, right
dose, right patient, right time, right administration
route” axiom of medication delivery. “We also include
information on the ‘Speak Up’ campaign in their educa
tion materials,” adds Hirsch. The campaign, part of a
Joint Commission effort to increase involvement in
patient care, produces brochures and materials on top
ics such as avoiding medication errors, fighting infec
tion, and controlling pain.
JHHCG believes that hand hygiene is the front line of
infection control, according to Myers. “We have adopted
the World Health Organization’s Five Moments technique,
which is more rigorous than what’s typically done in the
hospitals,” she says. “We are teaching this to patients and
caregivers as well so they can implement it in selfcare, and
check our clinicians working in their home.”
The team also taps into the wisdom of patients by
including safety questions on their patient satisfaction
surveys. “We ask them to share their concerns regard
ing safety and give us recommendations for improve
ment,” says Myers.
Patients are invited to serve on advisory committees
and give input into various improvement projects as
well. “Four or five years ago we were looking at new
pumps and solicited opinions from patients,” recalls
Choy. “We had them test out a couple of options, and
went with their recommendation—the lowertech
pump, which was less confusing to operate.”
Satisfaction all Around
Knowing that they are playing a part in positive changes
motivates employees to become active participants in
the safety culture. “You get encouragement and learn
to trust when you see the loop closed on an issue,”
obverses Beckett. “Even more important than the out
come is knowing you’ve been heard.”
“We perceive happiness from finding the best way to
serve patients,” adds England. “We strive to treat them
like we would members of our own family and that
means protecting them from harm.”
Not only is this approach good for patients in terms of
improved outcomes, but it also increases patient satis
faction—and employee satisfaction. “Employee satis
faction, patient satisfaction, and culture of safety all
align,” observes Myers.
In fact, research, conducted by Bryan Sexton, a for
mer faculty member at Johns Hopkins University
School of Medicine who created the Safety Attitudes
6. The NHIA LISTSERV®
Message Board
Your Convenient Source for Quick Answers to Your Most Pressing Home Infusion Questions
Only NHIA Members can gain instant
access to hundreds of alternatesite
infusion colleagues—and their wealth
of experience—with just a few clicks!
Network and Share Vital Information
Regardless of your role in the home infusion field, there is almost always someone on The NHIA LISTSERV® Message
Board that can provide succinct assistance to your clinical, reimbursement and other industryrelated questions—often
within a matter of minutes!
FREE to All NHIA Members
Best of all, every employee at each NHIA Member company can easily access this versatile resource for FREE—if you have
not yet signed up to take advantage of this crucial member benefit, here is what you need to do:
Go to: www.nhia.org/listserv
Download: The NHIA LISTSERV®
Message Board Getting Started Instructions—and follow the simple stepbystep directions
It’s that fast...and it’s that easy!
Special thanks to CPR+ for generously sponsoring
The NHIA LISTSERV®
Message Board!
Visit www.cprplus.com today.
CPR+COMPLETE PATIENT RECORDS
Resources
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/armstrong_institute/
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Safety Culture Primer
http://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer.aspx?primerID=5
Pharmacy Survey on Patient Safety
http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/pharmsurvey/pharmsopsform.pdf
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Linking Patient and Worker Safety
http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/healthcarefacilities/safetycul
ture_full.html
Joint Commission
Speak Up Initiatives
http://www.jointcommission.org/speakup.aspx
World Health Organization
Five Moments for Hand Hygiene
http://www.who.int/gpsc/tools/Five_moments/en/
Learn More
Members of the Johns Hopkins Home Care
Group team will be presenting on two qual
ityrelated topics at NHIA’s Annual
Conference & Exposition in Dallas. Be sure
to check out:
• Performance Improvement: Not Just a
“To Do”—But a Real Tool for Improving
Your Business (02A). Monday, April 8,
1:30 to 3:00 PM
• A Leadership & Management Workshop
program titled “Leveraging Evidence
Based Tools to Maximize Employee
Development and Impact,” which
includes two sessions:
— Creating an Engaged Workforce:
Indentifying Employee Needs (22F).
Thursday, April 11, 9:00 to 10:30 AM
— Creating an Engaged Workforce:
Developing and Implementing an
EmployeeDriven Action Plan (26G).
April 11, 10:45 AM to 12:45 PM
7. Questionnaire used by the Center of Innovation,
indeed shows a positive correlation between a high
culture of safety score and improved patient out
comes, including reduced length of stay, fewer med
ication errors, and lower rates of complications, such
as ventilatorassociated pneumonia and bloodstream
infections. But, Sexton also found a positive correla
tion between a high culture of safety score and sever
al human resources metrics, such as higher staff reten
tion, higher employee morale, lower staff burnout,
and less absenteeism.7
This is not surprising, consider
ing that a culture of safety requires good communica
tion, teamwork, and management support, which also
play heavily into employee engagement.
Commitment to personal growth is another byprod
uct of a safety culture, points out Gavgani, noting that
the just culture that encourages selfreporting is not an
excuse for sloppy work. “We set expectations with our
mission and vision, so there is accountability,” she
explains. “That level of dedication changes everyone,”
she says. “You are more likely to examine your weak
nesses and improve your skills.”
JHHCG regularly gauges employee satisfaction,
patient satisfaction, and culture of safety through blind
ed surveys. “The results give us a barometer of where
we are and show us areas for improvement,” Myers
explains. “We can always improve,” she adds. “There
will always be an error—how we handle it is what
makes the difference.”
Jeannie Counce is INFUSION’s Editor-in-Chief. She can be
reached at: jeannie.counce@nhia.org or 406-522-7222
References
1. Institute of Medicine. To err is human: Building a
safer health system. November 1999. National
Academy Press. Available at www.iom.edu/
~/media/Files/Report%20Files/1999/ToErris
Human/To%20Err%20is%20Human%201999%20%20rep
ort%20brief.pdf (accessed 2/28/13).
2. Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL, et al.
Estimating health careassociated infections and
deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002. Public Health Reports.
MarchApril 2007:160166. Available at
www.cdc.gov/HAI/pdfs/hai/infections_deaths.pdf
(accessed 2/28/13).
3. Agency for Healthcare Research Quality (AHRQ).
Patient Safety Network Glossary: High reliability
organziations. Available at
http://psnet.ahrq.gov/popup_glossary.aspx?name=
highreliabilityorganizations (accessed 2/28/13)
4. D Pittet, P Mourouga, Perneger T. (1999)
For information on digital advertising or sponsorship, contact David Gershman at 7038382665 or David.Gershman@nhia.org
NHIA Member Benefit!
Go to www.nhia.org/infusiononline to download your copy today!
Access Via The Web!
That’s right—you can now enjoy your favorite alternatesite “INFUSION” publication online!
“Flipable” pages Live links Searchable Sharable
8. Compliance with hand washing in a teaching hospi
tal. Annals of Internal Medicine 130(2), pp. 126–130.
5. Commonwealth Fund. Case Study: Keeping the com
mitment: Progress in patient safety. March 2011.
Available at /www.commonwealthfund.org/~/
media/Files/Publications/Case%20Study/2011/Mar/147
4_McCarthy_Johns_Hopkins_case_study_COR
RECTED_05292012.pdf (accessed 2/28/13).
6. P. Pronovost, D. Needham, S. Berenholtz et al., “An
Intervention to Decrease CatheterRelated
Bloodstream Infections in the ICU,” New England
Journal of Medicine, Dec. 28, 2006 355(26):2725–32.
7. Johns Hopkins Medicine, Center for Innovation in
Quality Patient Care. Why is safety culture impor
tant? Available at www.hopkinsmedicine.org/inno
vation_quality_patient_care/areas_expertise/impro
ve_patient_safety/culture/why_important.html
(accessed 2/28/13).
2014
NHIA Annual Conference & Exposition
Save the Date!
March 31 - April 3, 2014
Orlando, Florida
Tobeaddedtothe2014NHIAAnnualConference&Expositionattendeemailinglistortolearnabout
exhibit,sponsorship,and/oradvertisingopportunities,contactNHIAatinfo@nhia.orgor7038382663.