SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
-2-
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT TO ADD JUDMENT
DEBTORS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MILLER|LLP
Pursuant to California Evidence Code Sections 452(d) and (h), judgment creditors Knapp,
Petersen and Clarke, Stephen Ray Garcia, Stephen Harris, and Andre Jardini (collectively referred
to as “KPC”), respectfully ask this Court to take judicial notice of the following records:
1. All pleadings, files, trial transcripts, and any other evidence filed with the Court of Appeal
in Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, (2010), California Court of Appeal, Second
Appellate District, Division Eight, (Appeal Case No. B207567).
 Attached as Exhibit A-2 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Appellate
Court’s Decision affirming this Court’s ruling in Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen &
Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC286925).
2. All pleadings, files, trial transcripts, and any other evidence filed or in connection with the
underlying action, Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court,
(Case No. BC286925).
 Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Statement of Decision issued
by this Court in Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles
Superior Court (Case No. BC286925).
 Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Amended Judgment filed in
the Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court
(Case No. BC286925).
 Attached as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of excerpts and Reporter’s
Certificate from the Reporter’s Daily Transcript taken on August 2, 2007 in the
Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case
No. BC286925).
 Attached as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of excerpts and the Reporter’s
Certificate from the Reporter’s Daily Transcript on August 7, 2007 in the Gaggero
v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No.
BC286925).
-3-
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT TO ADD JUDMENT
DEBTORS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MILLER|LLP
 Attached as Exhibit N is a true and correct copy this Court’s transcript for the
October 5, 2011 hearing on the KPC’s motion to compel further responses to post-
judgment special interrogatories in the present case Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen &
Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC286925).
 Attached as Exhibit S is true and correct copy of excerpts from Joseph Praske’s
Third Party Debtor Exam taken on June 9, 2009 and the Reporter’s Certificate of
the transcript.
3. All pleadings, files, trial transcripts, and any other evidence in connection with Gaggero v.
Yura, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC239810).
 Attached as Exhibit M is a true and correct copy of the Declarations of Stephen M.
Gaggero and Joseph Praske in support of a Motion for Reconsideration filed the
Gaggero v. Yura, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC239810).
4. All pleadings, files, trial transcripts, and any other evidence filed with the Court of Appeal
from the appeal in Gaggero v. Yura (2008), California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District,
Division Five, (Appeal Case No. B203780).
5. Attached as Exhibits C-I are true and correct copies of excerpts from the Reporters
Transcript on Appeal filed in Gaggero v. Yura (2008), California Court of Appeal, Second
Appellate District, Division Five (Appeal Case No. B203780). Exhibit J is a true and correct copy
of the Reporter’s Certificate for the Transcripts on Appeal.
 Attached as Exhibits C is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s
Daily Transcript of Stephen Gaggero’s Direct Examination on June 27, 2005 from
the appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No.
BC239810).
 Attached as Exhibits D is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s
Daily Transcript of Stephen Gaggero’s Direct Examination on June 28, 2005 from
the appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No.
BC239810).
-4-
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT TO ADD JUDMENT
DEBTORS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MILLER|LLP
 Attached as Exhibits E is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s
Daily Transcript of Stephen Gaggero’s Direct Examination on June 29, 2005 from
the appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No.
BC239810).
 Attached as Exhibits F is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s
Daily Transcript of Joseph Praske Direct Examination on June 30, 2005 from the
appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No.
BC239810).
 Attached as Exhibits G is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s
Daily Transcript of Joseph Praske Cross Examination on June 30, 2005 from the
appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No.
BC239810).
 Attached as Exhibits H is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s
Daily Transcript of Stephen Gaggero’s Re-Direct Examination on July 15, 2005
from the appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No.
BC239810).
 Attached as Exhibits I is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s
Daily Transcript of Stephen Gaggero’s Re-Direct Examination on July 15, 2005
from the appeal of the Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case
No. BC239810).
 Attached as Exhibit J is a true and copy of the Reporter’s Certificate on Appeal
relating to the excerpts in Exhibits C-I above.
6. All documents publicly available on the Secretary of State of Nevada website
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch relating to Pacific Coast Management and related entities.
Attached as Exhibit O are documents obtained from the website of the Secretary of State of
Nevada.
0..
.....J
.....J
0:::
W
.....J
.....J
~
1 7. All documents publicly available on the Secretary of State of California website
2 http://kepler.sos.ca.govrelatingto 511 OFW, LP, Gingerbread Court, LP, Malibu Broadbeach, LP,
3 Marina Glencoe, LP, Blu House, LLC, Boardwalk Sunset, LLC, and related entities. Attached as
4 Exhibit P are documents obtained from the website ofthe Secretary of State ofCalifornia.
_5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Dated: April 10, 2012 MILLERLLP
. By: tL-b.- CiVaI,..~R_ANDALL A. MJ:LLER, ESQ.
AUSTA WAKlLY, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendants, KNAPP, PETERSEN &
CLARKE, STEPHEN RAY GARCIA, STEPHEN M.
HARRIS and ANDRE JARDINI
---2':1--------------_________________________________________________________ _
28
-5-
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT TO ADD JUDMENT
DEBTORS

More Related Content

What's hot

Government’s response to defendant’s petition for review of magistrate’s repo...
Government’s response to defendant’s petition for review of magistrate’s repo...Government’s response to defendant’s petition for review of magistrate’s repo...
Government’s response to defendant’s petition for review of magistrate’s repo...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severance
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severanceGovernment’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severance
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severanceCocoselul Inaripat
 
THESAURI AMERICAE SEPTENTRIONALIS SIGILLUM
THESAURI AMERICAE SEPTENTRIONALIS SIGILLUM THESAURI AMERICAE SEPTENTRIONALIS SIGILLUM
THESAURI AMERICAE SEPTENTRIONALIS SIGILLUM ICJ-ICC
 
Federal Court Decision in Alex Cooper v. EQT Production
Federal Court Decision in Alex Cooper v. EQT ProductionFederal Court Decision in Alex Cooper v. EQT Production
Federal Court Decision in Alex Cooper v. EQT ProductionMarcellus Drilling News
 
U.S. Patent Reform 2011: America Invents Act
U.S. Patent Reform 2011: America Invents ActU.S. Patent Reform 2011: America Invents Act
U.S. Patent Reform 2011: America Invents ActMintz Levin
 
DHS: "Torture of children is acceptable because...safety reasons!"
DHS: "Torture of children is acceptable because...safety reasons!" DHS: "Torture of children is acceptable because...safety reasons!"
DHS: "Torture of children is acceptable because...safety reasons!" amjolaw
 
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...Louis Charles Hamilton II
 
Citations of u.s courts and major rules for signals in blue book
Citations of u.s courts and major rules for signals in blue book Citations of u.s courts and major rules for signals in blue book
Citations of u.s courts and major rules for signals in blue book Rahul Mishra
 
Government’s response to the standing discovery order
Government’s response to the standing discovery orderGovernment’s response to the standing discovery order
Government’s response to the standing discovery orderCocoselul Inaripat
 

What's hot (11)

Government’s response to defendant’s petition for review of magistrate’s repo...
Government’s response to defendant’s petition for review of magistrate’s repo...Government’s response to defendant’s petition for review of magistrate’s repo...
Government’s response to defendant’s petition for review of magistrate’s repo...
 
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severance
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severanceGovernment’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severance
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severance
 
THESAURI AMERICAE SEPTENTRIONALIS SIGILLUM
THESAURI AMERICAE SEPTENTRIONALIS SIGILLUM THESAURI AMERICAE SEPTENTRIONALIS SIGILLUM
THESAURI AMERICAE SEPTENTRIONALIS SIGILLUM
 
Federal Court Decision in Alex Cooper v. EQT Production
Federal Court Decision in Alex Cooper v. EQT ProductionFederal Court Decision in Alex Cooper v. EQT Production
Federal Court Decision in Alex Cooper v. EQT Production
 
412 Response Motion
412 Response Motion412 Response Motion
412 Response Motion
 
U.S. Patent Reform 2011: America Invents Act
U.S. Patent Reform 2011: America Invents ActU.S. Patent Reform 2011: America Invents Act
U.S. Patent Reform 2011: America Invents Act
 
DHS: "Torture of children is acceptable because...safety reasons!"
DHS: "Torture of children is acceptable because...safety reasons!" DHS: "Torture of children is acceptable because...safety reasons!"
DHS: "Torture of children is acceptable because...safety reasons!"
 
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...
In The United States District Court Defendant “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. (Attor...
 
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...
AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN ...
 
Citations of u.s courts and major rules for signals in blue book
Citations of u.s courts and major rules for signals in blue book Citations of u.s courts and major rules for signals in blue book
Citations of u.s courts and major rules for signals in blue book
 
Government’s response to the standing discovery order
Government’s response to the standing discovery orderGovernment’s response to the standing discovery order
Government’s response to the standing discovery order
 

Viewers also liked

2011.02rev canda larga ranch
2011.02rev canda larga ranch2011.02rev canda larga ranch
2011.02rev canda larga ranchjamesmaredmond
 
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 08 06 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 08 06 03Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 08 06 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 08 06 03jamesmaredmond
 
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 01 27 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 01 27 03Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 01 27 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 01 27 03jamesmaredmond
 
B241675 cpr pacific marina
B241675 cpr pacific marinaB241675 cpr pacific marina
B241675 cpr pacific marinajamesmaredmond
 
Redmond sulphur mountain depo maraveles, william 07 29 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo maraveles, william 07 29 03Redmond sulphur mountain depo maraveles, william 07 29 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo maraveles, william 07 29 03jamesmaredmond
 
06 09-14 appellants' reply brief - stacey
06 09-14 appellants' reply brief - stacey06 09-14 appellants' reply brief - stacey
06 09-14 appellants' reply brief - staceyjamesmaredmond
 

Viewers also liked (17)

Master exhibit
Master exhibitMaster exhibit
Master exhibit
 
2011.02rev canda larga ranch
2011.02rev canda larga ranch2011.02rev canda larga ranch
2011.02rev canda larga ranch
 
20050920 b10
20050920 b1020050920 b10
20050920 b10
 
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 08 06 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 08 06 03Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 08 06 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 08 06 03
 
B243062 opinion
B243062 opinionB243062 opinion
B243062 opinion
 
Ca2 db241675 06
Ca2 db241675 06Ca2 db241675 06
Ca2 db241675 06
 
Yura rt proceedings
Yura  rt proceedingsYura  rt proceedings
Yura rt proceedings
 
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 01 27 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 01 27 03Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 01 27 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo redmond, geraldine 01 27 03
 
2005 9.9 redacted_5
2005 9.9 redacted_52005 9.9 redacted_5
2005 9.9 redacted_5
 
2005 9.9 redacted_6
2005 9.9 redacted_62005 9.9 redacted_6
2005 9.9 redacted_6
 
B245114 opinion
B245114 opinionB245114 opinion
B245114 opinion
 
B245114 cpr marina
B245114 cpr marinaB245114 cpr marina
B245114 cpr marina
 
B241675 cpr pacific marina
B241675 cpr pacific marinaB241675 cpr pacific marina
B241675 cpr pacific marina
 
Redmond sulphur mountain depo maraveles, william 07 29 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo maraveles, william 07 29 03Redmond sulphur mountain depo maraveles, william 07 29 03
Redmond sulphur mountain depo maraveles, william 07 29 03
 
06 09-14 appellants' reply brief - stacey
06 09-14 appellants' reply brief - stacey06 09-14 appellants' reply brief - stacey
06 09-14 appellants' reply brief - stacey
 
2005 9.9 redacted_3
2005 9.9 redacted_32005 9.9 redacted_3
2005 9.9 redacted_3
 
Ca2 db243062 01
Ca2 db243062 01Ca2 db243062 01
Ca2 db243062 01
 

Recently uploaded

How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...Finlaw Associates
 
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书SS A
 
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmmEssentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm2020000445musaib
 
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdfBPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdflaysamaeguardiano
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteDeepikaK245113
 
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusion
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusionIntroduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusion
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusionAnuragMishra811030
 
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAudience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMollyBrown86
 
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labourTHE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labourBhavikaGholap1
 
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxMOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxRRR Chambers
 
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptxINVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptxnyabatejosphat1
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULEsreeramsaipranitha
 
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction FailsCAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction FailsAurora Consulting
 
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxHuman Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxfilippoluciani9
 
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书SS A
 
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptxPamelaAbegailMonsant2
 
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhaiShashankKumar441258
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubham Wadhonkar
 
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptxKEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptxRRR Chambers
 

Recently uploaded (20)

How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
 
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
 
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmmEssentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
 
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdfBPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
 
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
 
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusion
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusionIntroduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusion
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusion
 
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAudience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labourTHE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labour
 
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxMOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
 
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptxINVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
 
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction FailsCAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
 
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxHuman Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
 
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
 
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx
 
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
 
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptxKEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
 
Rohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
Rohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No AdvanceRohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
Rohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
 

Request for judicial notice signed

  • 1.
  • 2. -2- REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT TO ADD JUDMENT DEBTORS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MILLER|LLP Pursuant to California Evidence Code Sections 452(d) and (h), judgment creditors Knapp, Petersen and Clarke, Stephen Ray Garcia, Stephen Harris, and Andre Jardini (collectively referred to as “KPC”), respectfully ask this Court to take judicial notice of the following records: 1. All pleadings, files, trial transcripts, and any other evidence filed with the Court of Appeal in Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, (2010), California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, (Appeal Case No. B207567).  Attached as Exhibit A-2 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Appellate Court’s Decision affirming this Court’s ruling in Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC286925). 2. All pleadings, files, trial transcripts, and any other evidence filed or in connection with the underlying action, Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court, (Case No. BC286925).  Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Statement of Decision issued by this Court in Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC286925).  Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Amended Judgment filed in the Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC286925).  Attached as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of excerpts and Reporter’s Certificate from the Reporter’s Daily Transcript taken on August 2, 2007 in the Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC286925).  Attached as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of excerpts and the Reporter’s Certificate from the Reporter’s Daily Transcript on August 7, 2007 in the Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC286925).
  • 3. -3- REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT TO ADD JUDMENT DEBTORS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MILLER|LLP  Attached as Exhibit N is a true and correct copy this Court’s transcript for the October 5, 2011 hearing on the KPC’s motion to compel further responses to post- judgment special interrogatories in the present case Gaggero v. Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC286925).  Attached as Exhibit S is true and correct copy of excerpts from Joseph Praske’s Third Party Debtor Exam taken on June 9, 2009 and the Reporter’s Certificate of the transcript. 3. All pleadings, files, trial transcripts, and any other evidence in connection with Gaggero v. Yura, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC239810).  Attached as Exhibit M is a true and correct copy of the Declarations of Stephen M. Gaggero and Joseph Praske in support of a Motion for Reconsideration filed the Gaggero v. Yura, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC239810). 4. All pleadings, files, trial transcripts, and any other evidence filed with the Court of Appeal from the appeal in Gaggero v. Yura (2008), California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Five, (Appeal Case No. B203780). 5. Attached as Exhibits C-I are true and correct copies of excerpts from the Reporters Transcript on Appeal filed in Gaggero v. Yura (2008), California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Five (Appeal Case No. B203780). Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of the Reporter’s Certificate for the Transcripts on Appeal.  Attached as Exhibits C is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s Daily Transcript of Stephen Gaggero’s Direct Examination on June 27, 2005 from the appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC239810).  Attached as Exhibits D is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s Daily Transcript of Stephen Gaggero’s Direct Examination on June 28, 2005 from the appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC239810).
  • 4. -4- REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT TO ADD JUDMENT DEBTORS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MILLER|LLP  Attached as Exhibits E is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s Daily Transcript of Stephen Gaggero’s Direct Examination on June 29, 2005 from the appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC239810).  Attached as Exhibits F is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s Daily Transcript of Joseph Praske Direct Examination on June 30, 2005 from the appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC239810).  Attached as Exhibits G is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s Daily Transcript of Joseph Praske Cross Examination on June 30, 2005 from the appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC239810).  Attached as Exhibits H is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s Daily Transcript of Stephen Gaggero’s Re-Direct Examination on July 15, 2005 from the appeal of Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC239810).  Attached as Exhibits I is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Reporter’s Daily Transcript of Stephen Gaggero’s Re-Direct Examination on July 15, 2005 from the appeal of the Gaggero v. Yura, et al, Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC239810).  Attached as Exhibit J is a true and copy of the Reporter’s Certificate on Appeal relating to the excerpts in Exhibits C-I above. 6. All documents publicly available on the Secretary of State of Nevada website http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch relating to Pacific Coast Management and related entities. Attached as Exhibit O are documents obtained from the website of the Secretary of State of Nevada.
  • 5. 0.. .....J .....J 0::: W .....J .....J ~ 1 7. All documents publicly available on the Secretary of State of California website 2 http://kepler.sos.ca.govrelatingto 511 OFW, LP, Gingerbread Court, LP, Malibu Broadbeach, LP, 3 Marina Glencoe, LP, Blu House, LLC, Boardwalk Sunset, LLC, and related entities. Attached as 4 Exhibit P are documents obtained from the website ofthe Secretary of State ofCalifornia. _5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Dated: April 10, 2012 MILLERLLP . By: tL-b.- CiVaI,..~R_ANDALL A. MJ:LLER, ESQ. AUSTA WAKlLY, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants, KNAPP, PETERSEN & CLARKE, STEPHEN RAY GARCIA, STEPHEN M. HARRIS and ANDRE JARDINI ---2':1--------------_________________________________________________________ _ 28 -5- REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT TO ADD JUDMENT DEBTORS