SlideShare a Scribd company logo
REISSUE
APRIL 2003
MORNING – AFTERNOON
11. ANSWER:(E) is the most correctanswer.(A) and(C) can be correctedby a certificate of Correction.
MPEP § 1481. (D) can be correctedby a Certificate of Correction.37CFR § 1.324; MPEP § 1481. (B) is
incorrect.Sucha mistake,whichaffectsthe scope andmeaningof the claimsinapatent,isnot
consideredtobe of the “minor” characterrequiredforissuance of a Certificate of Correction.MPEP§
1481.
13. ANSWER:(C) isthe mostcorrect. See MPEP § 1412.02, Recapture.Asto(A),recapture occurswhen
the claimis broadened.Addingalimitationwouldnarrow the claim.Asto(B),recapture doesnotapply
to continuations.Asto(D),the two-yeardate relatestobroadeningreissue applications,nottothe issue
of recapture.35 U.S.C. 251 prescribesa2-yearlimitforfilingapplicationsforbroadeningreissues:“No
reissue patentshall be grantedenlargingthe scope of the original patentunlessappliedforwithintwo
yearsfrom the grant of the original patent.”(E) isincorrectbecause a(C) iscorrect.
6. ANSWER: (C) isthe most correct answer.See MPEP§ 1411.01. Asto (A) see MPEP § 1402. A reissue
patentisnot granted.Asto (B),newmattermay not be enteredinareissue.Asto(D) see MPEP §
1412.03. Since (A),and(B) are incorrect,(E) is incorrect.
14. ANSWER:(C) isthe mostcorrect answer.Answers(A),(D) and(E) are incorrectbecause a broadening
reissue applicationmustbe filedwithintwoyearsof issuance of the original patent.35 U.S.C.§ 251;
MPEP § 1412.03. Answer(B) isincorrectbecause the assignee maynotfile abroadeningreissue
application.MPEP§ 706.03(x).
OCTOBER 2003
MORNING – AFTERNOON
16. ANSWER:(A) isthe most correct answer.35 U.S.C. § 251, MPEP § 1402 (fifth paragraph).MPEP§
1402 statesthat one of the “mostcommonbasesfor filingareissue application[is] (A) the claimsare
too narrowor too broad.” The claimsmay be broadenedinareissue applicationfiledbythe inventor
withintwoyearsfromthe patentissue date.(B) isincorrectsince the 4th paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 251
statesthat no reissuedpatentshallbe grantedenlargingthe scope of the clamsof the original patent
unlessappliedforwithintwoyearsfromthe grantof the original patent.(C) and(E) are incorrect.MPEP
§ 1402, sixteenthparagraph.Anapplicant’sfailuretotimelyfile adivisionalapplicationwhilethe original
applicationisstill pendingisnotconsideredtobe anerror correctable viareissue.See Inre Orita,550
F.2d 1277, 1280, 193 USPQ 145, 148 (CCPA 1977). (D) isincorrect.MPEP § 201.06. Inorder to claim
benefitunder35U.S.C. § 120 to a parentapplication,adivisional applicationmustbe filedwhilethe
parentpatentapplicationisstill pending.
2. ANSWER: (D) isthe mostcorrect answer.MPEP§§ 1403 and 1412.03, underthe heading“WhenA
BroadenedClaimCanBe Presented.”A broadeningreissue claimmustbe filedwithinthe twoyearsfrom
the grant of the original patent.(D) isthe mostcorrect and the examiner shouldexaminethe case asany
otherapplicationandaddressappropriate issuesconcerningreissue examination.See Switzerv.
Sockman,333 F.2d 935, 142 USPQ 226 (CCPA 1964) (a similarrule ininterferences).Since applicantfiled
the amendmentbyExpressMail,the amendmentistreatedasbeingfiledwiththe USPTOonthe date of
depositwiththe USPostal Service.Therefore,(A),(B) and(C) are incorrectanswers.A reissue
applicationcanbe granteda filingdate withoutanoathor declaration,orwithoutthe filingfeebeing
present.See 37 CFR § 1.53(f). Applicantwillbe givenaperiodof time toprovide the missingpartsandto
pay the surcharge under37 CFR § 1.16(e).See MPEP § 1410.01. Choice (E) isnot correct since the mere
deletionof anelementof aclaimdoesnot automaticallyraise agroundof rejectionbasedonthe
recapture doctrine.See MPEP§ 1412.02.
11. ANSWER:(E) is the most correctanswer.35 U.S.C.§ 251; 37 CFR § 1.53(f); MPEP § 1403. Filinga
broadenedreissueapplicationwithatleastone broadeningclaimpriortothe expirationof the two-year
time periodsetinthe statute satisfiesthe diligenceprovisionsof 35U.S.C. § 251. The executedreissue
oath/declarationandthe filingfee maybe filedata latertime.AccordingtoMPEP § 1403, a reissue
applicationcanbe granteda filingdate withoutanoathor declaration,orwithoutthe filingfeebeing
present.See 37 CFR § 1.53(f). The reissue applicantwill be givenaperiodof time toprovide the missing
parts and to paythe surcharge under37 CFR § 1.16(e).See MPEP § 1410.01. (A),(B) and (D) are clearly
incorrectsince the inventorsandassignee wouldbe barredfromabroadeningreissueif filedafterthe
twoyear periodsetinthe statute.(C) isincorrectsince the reissue applicationwasfiledwithoutatleast
one broadeningclaimpriortothe expirationof the two-yeartime periodsetin35 U.S.C.§ 251.

More Related Content

Similar to Reissue 1400 answers

2003apr15ans
2003apr15ans2003apr15ans
2003apr15ans
Leon Li
 
Appeal 1200 answers
Appeal 1200 answersAppeal 1200 answers
Appeal 1200 answers
Leon Li
 
SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
Katrina Swanson
 
Cigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
Cigna Corp. v. Amara RevisitedCigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
Cigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
Rachel Hamilton
 
Reissue 1400 questions
Reissue 1400 questionsReissue 1400 questions
Reissue 1400 questions
Leon Li
 
2003 oct15ans
2003 oct15ans2003 oct15ans
2003 oct15ans
Leon Li
 
Ca2 db241675 01
Ca2 db241675 01Ca2 db241675 01
Ca2 db241675 01
jamesmaredmond
 
Automatically Denormalizing Document Relationships
Automatically Denormalizing Document RelationshipsAutomatically Denormalizing Document Relationships
Automatically Denormalizing Document Relationships
WillThompson78
 
Coleman v milwaukee bd of school
Coleman v milwaukee bd of schoolColeman v milwaukee bd of school
Coleman v milwaukee bd of school
Brian Bateman
 
writing sample opening brief quick
writing sample opening brief quickwriting sample opening brief quick
writing sample opening brief quick
Alan M. Goldberg, Esq.
 
Letter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdf
Letter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdfLetter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdf
Letter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdf
Hindenburg Research
 
Patent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS Encryption
Patent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS EncryptionPatent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS Encryption
Patent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS Encryption
The Hacker News
 
Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016
Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016
Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016
happyschools
 
PEDF Petition to Prevent More Drilling Under PA State Forests
PEDF Petition to Prevent More Drilling Under PA State ForestsPEDF Petition to Prevent More Drilling Under PA State Forests
PEDF Petition to Prevent More Drilling Under PA State Forests
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Vargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public Citizen
Vargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public CitizenVargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public Citizen
Vargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public Citizen
M. Frank Bednarz
 
Mc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissionerMc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissioner
jrbampfield
 
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdfScott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
McMillan_Law_La_Mesa Alert
 
Yura court orders
Yura  court ordersYura  court orders
Yura court orders
jamesmaredmond
 
AMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin Ayars
AMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin AyarsAMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin Ayars
AMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin Ayars
Umbrella Management Group
 
'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...
'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...
'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...
mh37o
 

Similar to Reissue 1400 answers (20)

2003apr15ans
2003apr15ans2003apr15ans
2003apr15ans
 
Appeal 1200 answers
Appeal 1200 answersAppeal 1200 answers
Appeal 1200 answers
 
SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
SwansonWritingSampleSummer2014
 
Cigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
Cigna Corp. v. Amara RevisitedCigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
Cigna Corp. v. Amara Revisited
 
Reissue 1400 questions
Reissue 1400 questionsReissue 1400 questions
Reissue 1400 questions
 
2003 oct15ans
2003 oct15ans2003 oct15ans
2003 oct15ans
 
Ca2 db241675 01
Ca2 db241675 01Ca2 db241675 01
Ca2 db241675 01
 
Automatically Denormalizing Document Relationships
Automatically Denormalizing Document RelationshipsAutomatically Denormalizing Document Relationships
Automatically Denormalizing Document Relationships
 
Coleman v milwaukee bd of school
Coleman v milwaukee bd of schoolColeman v milwaukee bd of school
Coleman v milwaukee bd of school
 
writing sample opening brief quick
writing sample opening brief quickwriting sample opening brief quick
writing sample opening brief quick
 
Letter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdf
Letter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdfLetter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdf
Letter Decision Resolving Defendants' Motion For Leave To Amend .pdf
 
Patent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS Encryption
Patent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS EncryptionPatent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS Encryption
Patent Troll - Big Websites Sued For Using HTTPS Encryption
 
Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016
Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016
Stem OPT Extension Judge Decision - Jan 23, 2016
 
PEDF Petition to Prevent More Drilling Under PA State Forests
PEDF Petition to Prevent More Drilling Under PA State ForestsPEDF Petition to Prevent More Drilling Under PA State Forests
PEDF Petition to Prevent More Drilling Under PA State Forests
 
Vargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public Citizen
Vargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public CitizenVargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public Citizen
Vargas v. Ford - denying appeal bond to Public Citizen
 
Mc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissionerMc clanahan v. commissioner
Mc clanahan v. commissioner
 
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdfScott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
 
Yura court orders
Yura  court ordersYura  court orders
Yura court orders
 
AMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin Ayars
AMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin AyarsAMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin Ayars
AMEC v. VDOT Opinion 2008 - Justin Ayars
 
'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...
'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...
'Madhavi Vuppalpati & Anandhan Jayaraman defeated in their attempt to derail ...
 

Recently uploaded

XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdfXYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
bhavenpr
 
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal EnvironmentsFrom Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
ssusera97a2f
 
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
gjsma0ep
 
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
osenwakm
 
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining FuturesEnergizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
USDAReapgrants.com
 
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMatthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
MattGardner52
 
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
20jcoello
 
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th semTax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
azizurrahaman17
 
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
SKshi
 
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
osenwakm
 
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
 
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee
 
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Massimo Talia
 
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersDefending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
HarpreetSaini48
 
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
lawyersonia
 
Ease of Paying Tax Law Republic Act 11976
Ease of Paying Tax Law Republic Act 11976Ease of Paying Tax Law Republic Act 11976
Ease of Paying Tax Law Republic Act 11976
PelayoGilbert
 
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxGenocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
MasoudZamani13
 
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in ItalyThe Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
BridgeWest.eu
 
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
CIkumparan
 
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdfV.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
bhavenpr
 

Recently uploaded (20)

XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdfXYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
 
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal EnvironmentsFrom Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
 
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
 
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
 
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining FuturesEnergizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
 
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMatthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
 
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
 
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th semTax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
 
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
 
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
 
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
 
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
 
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
 
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersDefending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
 
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
 
Ease of Paying Tax Law Republic Act 11976
Ease of Paying Tax Law Republic Act 11976Ease of Paying Tax Law Republic Act 11976
Ease of Paying Tax Law Republic Act 11976
 
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxGenocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
 
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in ItalyThe Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
 
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
 
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdfV.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
 

Reissue 1400 answers

  • 3. 11. ANSWER:(E) is the most correctanswer.(A) and(C) can be correctedby a certificate of Correction. MPEP § 1481. (D) can be correctedby a Certificate of Correction.37CFR § 1.324; MPEP § 1481. (B) is incorrect.Sucha mistake,whichaffectsthe scope andmeaningof the claimsinapatent,isnot consideredtobe of the “minor” characterrequiredforissuance of a Certificate of Correction.MPEP§ 1481.
  • 4. 13. ANSWER:(C) isthe mostcorrect. See MPEP § 1412.02, Recapture.Asto(A),recapture occurswhen the claimis broadened.Addingalimitationwouldnarrow the claim.Asto(B),recapture doesnotapply to continuations.Asto(D),the two-yeardate relatestobroadeningreissue applications,nottothe issue of recapture.35 U.S.C. 251 prescribesa2-yearlimitforfilingapplicationsforbroadeningreissues:“No reissue patentshall be grantedenlargingthe scope of the original patentunlessappliedforwithintwo yearsfrom the grant of the original patent.”(E) isincorrectbecause a(C) iscorrect.
  • 5. 6. ANSWER: (C) isthe most correct answer.See MPEP§ 1411.01. Asto (A) see MPEP § 1402. A reissue patentisnot granted.Asto (B),newmattermay not be enteredinareissue.Asto(D) see MPEP § 1412.03. Since (A),and(B) are incorrect,(E) is incorrect.
  • 6. 14. ANSWER:(C) isthe mostcorrect answer.Answers(A),(D) and(E) are incorrectbecause a broadening reissue applicationmustbe filedwithintwoyearsof issuance of the original patent.35 U.S.C.§ 251; MPEP § 1412.03. Answer(B) isincorrectbecause the assignee maynotfile abroadeningreissue application.MPEP§ 706.03(x).
  • 8. 16. ANSWER:(A) isthe most correct answer.35 U.S.C. § 251, MPEP § 1402 (fifth paragraph).MPEP§ 1402 statesthat one of the “mostcommonbasesfor filingareissue application[is] (A) the claimsare too narrowor too broad.” The claimsmay be broadenedinareissue applicationfiledbythe inventor withintwoyearsfromthe patentissue date.(B) isincorrectsince the 4th paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 251 statesthat no reissuedpatentshallbe grantedenlargingthe scope of the clamsof the original patent unlessappliedforwithintwoyearsfromthe grantof the original patent.(C) and(E) are incorrect.MPEP § 1402, sixteenthparagraph.Anapplicant’sfailuretotimelyfile adivisionalapplicationwhilethe original applicationisstill pendingisnotconsideredtobe anerror correctable viareissue.See Inre Orita,550 F.2d 1277, 1280, 193 USPQ 145, 148 (CCPA 1977). (D) isincorrect.MPEP § 201.06. Inorder to claim benefitunder35U.S.C. § 120 to a parentapplication,adivisional applicationmustbe filedwhilethe parentpatentapplicationisstill pending.
  • 9. 2. ANSWER: (D) isthe mostcorrect answer.MPEP§§ 1403 and 1412.03, underthe heading“WhenA BroadenedClaimCanBe Presented.”A broadeningreissue claimmustbe filedwithinthe twoyearsfrom the grant of the original patent.(D) isthe mostcorrect and the examiner shouldexaminethe case asany otherapplicationandaddressappropriate issuesconcerningreissue examination.See Switzerv. Sockman,333 F.2d 935, 142 USPQ 226 (CCPA 1964) (a similarrule ininterferences).Since applicantfiled the amendmentbyExpressMail,the amendmentistreatedasbeingfiledwiththe USPTOonthe date of depositwiththe USPostal Service.Therefore,(A),(B) and(C) are incorrectanswers.A reissue applicationcanbe granteda filingdate withoutanoathor declaration,orwithoutthe filingfeebeing present.See 37 CFR § 1.53(f). Applicantwillbe givenaperiodof time toprovide the missingpartsandto pay the surcharge under37 CFR § 1.16(e).See MPEP § 1410.01. Choice (E) isnot correct since the mere deletionof anelementof aclaimdoesnot automaticallyraise agroundof rejectionbasedonthe recapture doctrine.See MPEP§ 1412.02.
  • 10. 11. ANSWER:(E) is the most correctanswer.35 U.S.C.§ 251; 37 CFR § 1.53(f); MPEP § 1403. Filinga broadenedreissueapplicationwithatleastone broadeningclaimpriortothe expirationof the two-year time periodsetinthe statute satisfiesthe diligenceprovisionsof 35U.S.C. § 251. The executedreissue oath/declarationandthe filingfee maybe filedata latertime.AccordingtoMPEP § 1403, a reissue applicationcanbe granteda filingdate withoutanoathor declaration,orwithoutthe filingfeebeing present.See 37 CFR § 1.53(f). The reissue applicantwill be givenaperiodof time toprovide the missing parts and to paythe surcharge under37 CFR § 1.16(e).See MPEP § 1410.01. (A),(B) and (D) are clearly incorrectsince the inventorsandassignee wouldbe barredfromabroadeningreissueif filedafterthe twoyear periodsetinthe statute.(C) isincorrectsince the reissue applicationwasfiledwithoutatleast one broadeningclaimpriortothe expirationof the two-yeartime periodsetin35 U.S.C.§ 251.