SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Regulating the Public Forum
Types of Forums
• Classical or quintessential: streets and parks
• Dedicated: made available for a “wide range” of expressive
purposes
– Exclusion of subject-matter or viewpoint is impermissible
– What counts as a viewpoint?
• “Religion” in Rosenberger is a viewpoint, not a subject-matter
• Limited-purpose: made available for a subcategory of expressive
activity
– Municipal auditorium for musical performances but not political rallies or
motivational speakers
– What’s the scope of the category
• “Family-friendly” performances?
• Non-public forums [better labeled “not a public forum”]
– Subject-matter discrimination allowed (Lehman)
– Viewpoint discrimination might be allowed (Forbes, the cadidate debate
case)
Evaluation
• Reduction in amount of speech
• Risk of disparate impact?
– Increases as you move down from quintessential to non-public forums
– Perhaps offset by other values
• Constraints on governments from sources other than constitutional
law
– Economics: need to cover overhead costs of auditorium and buses
• Will adopt policies that maximize income, which might reduce risk of
disparate impact/discrimination
– Politics
• Some constituents will want access to the venue
• For all but non-public forums, the cost of giving them access is giving
everyone else (in the relevant category) access
• Limits of politics in non-public forums, as in Forbes, where a serious
candidate is excluded from the debates, or in bus advertising for Christian
but not Jewish or Muslim services

More Related Content

More from jillieusa

Expressive Association
Expressive AssociationExpressive Association
Expressive Association
jillieusa
 
Symbolic Speech
Symbolic SpeechSymbolic Speech
Symbolic Speech
jillieusa
 
Regulating the public_forum
Regulating the public_forumRegulating the public_forum
Regulating the public_forumjillieusa
 
Content neutral regulations
Content neutral regulationsContent neutral regulations
Content neutral regulations
jillieusa
 
Pornography
PornographyPornography
Pornography
jillieusa
 
Hate Speech
Hate SpeechHate Speech
Hate Speech
jillieusa
 
Offensiveness
OffensivenessOffensiveness
Offensivenessjillieusa
 

More from jillieusa (7)

Expressive Association
Expressive AssociationExpressive Association
Expressive Association
 
Symbolic Speech
Symbolic SpeechSymbolic Speech
Symbolic Speech
 
Regulating the public_forum
Regulating the public_forumRegulating the public_forum
Regulating the public_forum
 
Content neutral regulations
Content neutral regulationsContent neutral regulations
Content neutral regulations
 
Pornography
PornographyPornography
Pornography
 
Hate Speech
Hate SpeechHate Speech
Hate Speech
 
Offensiveness
OffensivenessOffensiveness
Offensiveness
 

Regulating the public_forum

  • 2. Types of Forums • Classical or quintessential: streets and parks • Dedicated: made available for a “wide range” of expressive purposes – Exclusion of subject-matter or viewpoint is impermissible – What counts as a viewpoint? • “Religion” in Rosenberger is a viewpoint, not a subject-matter • Limited-purpose: made available for a subcategory of expressive activity – Municipal auditorium for musical performances but not political rallies or motivational speakers – What’s the scope of the category • “Family-friendly” performances? • Non-public forums [better labeled “not a public forum”] – Subject-matter discrimination allowed (Lehman) – Viewpoint discrimination might be allowed (Forbes, the cadidate debate case)
  • 3. Evaluation • Reduction in amount of speech • Risk of disparate impact? – Increases as you move down from quintessential to non-public forums – Perhaps offset by other values • Constraints on governments from sources other than constitutional law – Economics: need to cover overhead costs of auditorium and buses • Will adopt policies that maximize income, which might reduce risk of disparate impact/discrimination – Politics • Some constituents will want access to the venue • For all but non-public forums, the cost of giving them access is giving everyone else (in the relevant category) access • Limits of politics in non-public forums, as in Forbes, where a serious candidate is excluded from the debates, or in bus advertising for Christian but not Jewish or Muslim services