The G20 finance ministers observed the need to improve transparency and comparability of public sector financial reporting to strengthen public sector balance sheets. While standards for the private sector have become increasingly global through the IASB, development of standards for the public sector has lagged behind. The IPSASB aims to establish global standards for the public sector but faces constraints like its predecessor the IASC. To achieve global standards, the IPSASB may need to be restructured like the IASB to overcome limitations of being part-time and resource constrained.
The document provides an overview of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). It discusses that IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest. It has over 175 professional accountancy organization members from over 130 countries. IFAC supports the development of high-quality international standards through four standard-setting boards that deal with auditing, ethics, education and public sector accounting. It also discusses IFAC's mission, vision and activities in strengthening the global accountancy profession.
Ecobank Transnational Incorporated (ETI), the parent company of the Ecobank Group, achieved significant growth in 2007. Net profit after tax was $139 million, up 61% from 2006. ETI operates in 22 African countries and provides banking and financial services through its subsidiaries. In 2007, ETI expanded into 5 more countries, making it the bank with operations in the most African countries. The directors recommend a dividend of 2 cents per share, a 50% increase over 2006. ETI will seek to further sub-divide its shares to improve liquidity.
Ecobank Group celebrated its 25th anniversary in 2013. Over the past 25 years, Ecobank has grown from a single branch in Togo to become a leading pan-African bank with over 1,200 branches across 35 African countries. The annual report highlights Ecobank's strong financial performance in 2013, with net revenue increasing 16% to over $2 billion despite challenges in the operating environment. Looking ahead, Ecobank is confident about further opportunities for growth across Africa over the next 25 years.
- The Investment Corporation of Armenia (ICA) is proposed as a new sovereign investment vehicle to bridge foreign and domestic investment in Armenia.
- ICA would be established by transforming an existing government-owned corporate entity into ICA and providing an initial funding of 1 billion Dram.
- In its first 18 months, ICA aims to recruit key personnel, rebrand, prepare financial instruments, secure its first joint venture, and issue related instruments.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is an independent organization that establishes International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) accepted globally. The IASB consists of 14 members from different countries and backgrounds who meet publicly to develop high-quality, transparent accounting standards. It seeks to develop a single set of global standards in the public interest and operates independently without political influence through an established due process.
Ecobank Transnational Incorporated achieved record profits in 2004 due to growth in key areas of its business. Operating income increased 32.6% to $207.8 million driven by a 27% rise in customer deposits to $1.46 billion. Profit before tax grew 24.4% to $60.3 million, a new high. The bank strengthened its presence across Africa by opening new branches and offices, launching new products like credit cards, and establishing a new subsidiary in Cape Verde. Looking forward, Ecobank aims to maintain its strong performance by focusing on core markets and business lines while ensuring prudent risk management and governance.
This document provides a summary of Ecobank's principal subsidiaries and offices across 13 countries in West and Central Africa. It lists the contact information including addresses and phone numbers for Ecobank's country offices in Benin, Cote d'Ivoire, Liberia, Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mali, Senegal, Cameroon, Guinea, Niger, Togo, and also lists some key subsidiary offices.
The document discusses accounting standards and standards setting bodies in India and internationally. It provides information on the Accounting Standards Board of India (ASB), which establishes accounting standards for India. It also describes the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), which set international and US accounting standards, respectively. The IASB's role in the IFRS setting process and India's convergence with IFRS are summarized.
The document provides an overview of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). It discusses that IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession, dedicated to serving the public interest. It has over 175 professional accountancy organization members from over 130 countries. IFAC supports the development of high-quality international standards through four standard-setting boards that deal with auditing, ethics, education and public sector accounting. It also discusses IFAC's mission, vision and activities in strengthening the global accountancy profession.
Ecobank Transnational Incorporated (ETI), the parent company of the Ecobank Group, achieved significant growth in 2007. Net profit after tax was $139 million, up 61% from 2006. ETI operates in 22 African countries and provides banking and financial services through its subsidiaries. In 2007, ETI expanded into 5 more countries, making it the bank with operations in the most African countries. The directors recommend a dividend of 2 cents per share, a 50% increase over 2006. ETI will seek to further sub-divide its shares to improve liquidity.
Ecobank Group celebrated its 25th anniversary in 2013. Over the past 25 years, Ecobank has grown from a single branch in Togo to become a leading pan-African bank with over 1,200 branches across 35 African countries. The annual report highlights Ecobank's strong financial performance in 2013, with net revenue increasing 16% to over $2 billion despite challenges in the operating environment. Looking ahead, Ecobank is confident about further opportunities for growth across Africa over the next 25 years.
- The Investment Corporation of Armenia (ICA) is proposed as a new sovereign investment vehicle to bridge foreign and domestic investment in Armenia.
- ICA would be established by transforming an existing government-owned corporate entity into ICA and providing an initial funding of 1 billion Dram.
- In its first 18 months, ICA aims to recruit key personnel, rebrand, prepare financial instruments, secure its first joint venture, and issue related instruments.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is an independent organization that establishes International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) accepted globally. The IASB consists of 14 members from different countries and backgrounds who meet publicly to develop high-quality, transparent accounting standards. It seeks to develop a single set of global standards in the public interest and operates independently without political influence through an established due process.
Ecobank Transnational Incorporated achieved record profits in 2004 due to growth in key areas of its business. Operating income increased 32.6% to $207.8 million driven by a 27% rise in customer deposits to $1.46 billion. Profit before tax grew 24.4% to $60.3 million, a new high. The bank strengthened its presence across Africa by opening new branches and offices, launching new products like credit cards, and establishing a new subsidiary in Cape Verde. Looking forward, Ecobank aims to maintain its strong performance by focusing on core markets and business lines while ensuring prudent risk management and governance.
This document provides a summary of Ecobank's principal subsidiaries and offices across 13 countries in West and Central Africa. It lists the contact information including addresses and phone numbers for Ecobank's country offices in Benin, Cote d'Ivoire, Liberia, Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mali, Senegal, Cameroon, Guinea, Niger, Togo, and also lists some key subsidiary offices.
The document discusses accounting standards and standards setting bodies in India and internationally. It provides information on the Accounting Standards Board of India (ASB), which establishes accounting standards for India. It also describes the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), which set international and US accounting standards, respectively. The IASB's role in the IFRS setting process and India's convergence with IFRS are summarized.
Private Equity Investment in Africa - In Support of Inclusive and Green Growt...asafeiran
!e African Development Bank Group uses Private Equity
Funds to invest in a diverse range of African enterprises,
supporting them in their expansion and giving them the capital and the expertise to grow, creating jobs and driving economic growth. !e funds to which the Bank has committed are invested in 294 individual companies across the continent.
The document discusses International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which are a set of global accounting standards intended to make company financial statements consistent, transparent, and comparable worldwide. IFRS are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and specify how companies must maintain records and report expenses, income, and financial position. Over 160 countries require public companies to use IFRS to increase transparency and efficiency in global financial markets, though the U.S. and China use their own standards. There are currently 16 IFRS standards addressing topics like financial instruments, revenue recognition, and leases.
ADAA is primarily responsible for enhancing and promoting transparency and accountability across Abu Dhabi government and public entities ensuring that these subject entities are managing and utilizing their resources and funds efficiently, effectively, economically, ethically and in alignment with achieving the overall vision of Abu Dhabi.
The document discusses Thailand's efforts to become the number 1 medical hub of Asia. It notes that Thailand already has a strong healthcare infrastructure and reputation for skilled medical professionals. The Thai government is supporting policies to strengthen Thailand's position as a regional medical hub through its Thailand 4.0 policy and 2016-2025 Strategic Plan. Factors like rising healthcare demand from Thailand's aging population, strong medical facilities, and attractive investment incentives are also helping Thailand become the top medical hub in the region.
This document provides information about chartered accountants and accounting bodies worldwide. It discusses that chartered accountants have been a mark of excellence in business for over 150 years, advising organizations and effectively managing finances. It also summarizes the major international and national accounting standard-setting and auditing standard-setting bodies, as well as professional accounting bodies in different countries like the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Bangladesh and the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
International financial reporting standards (ifrs)Nikhil Priya
The document provides information about International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS):
1. IFRS are established by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to develop a single set of high-quality global accounting standards.
2. The objectives of IASB are to develop high-quality understandable global standards, promote their use, and work to converge national standards with IFRS.
3. Adopting IFRS allows multinational businesses to use the same accounting practices worldwide, facilitates comparison of financial statements globally, and enables access to international capital markets.
Access Bank reported strong financial results for the 2009 fiscal year. Profit before tax increased 48% to N28.1 billion, driven by growth in core banking operations. Loan portfolio diversified across sectors with trade as the largest contributor. The institutional banking division recorded the highest profit before tax of N11.4 billion and managed the largest portion of total bank assets. Overall, all business segments improved financial performance compared to the previous fiscal year.
Emergence of international financial reporting standard in india accounting s...Alexander Decker
This document discusses the emergence of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in India's accounting system. It notes that globalization has increased demand for comparable financial reporting across borders. While basic accounting principles are widely accepted, application differences between countries create non-optimal information for financial statement users. Adopting IFRS would help harmonize rules and allow easier cross-border investments and business decisions. The document examines rationales for India adopting IFRS, differences between IFRS and Indian standards, and challenges of convergence, such as conflicting regulations and technical preparedness. Overall, a common global reporting language using IFRS could improve capital allocation and investor confidence internationally.
- Access Bank Plc is a leading Nigerian bank with operations across Nigeria and 8 other African countries, as well as the UK.
- In 2010, the bank recorded a 564% increase in profit before tax to N16.1 billion, up from N3.48 billion in 2009, driven by strong performance from its Nigerian operations.
- The bank has five major business segments: institutional banking, commercial banking, investment banking, retail banking, and transaction services. It serves over 2 million customers through 148 branches across its markets.
Republic of Moldova - Competitiveness recommendationsOECDglobal
The document discusses improving access to finance for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the Republic of Moldova. It will undergo a peer review process to receive feedback and recommendations. The summary is:
1) Access to finance is a major challenge for SMEs in Moldova due to an underdeveloped legal framework, limited sources of funding, and low financial literacy.
2) Moldova's action plan seeks to strengthen regulations, expand credit information sharing, and improve financial skills to address these issues.
3) During the peer review, Moldova will receive input on guidelines to further enhance laws and regulations, diversify financing options such as microcredit and leasing, and better support SME business
This document provides an overview of integrated reporting (<IR>) and the role of audit committees. It discusses the benefits of <IR> in providing a holistic view of an organization's strategy, governance, performance and prospects. The International Integrated Reporting Council developed a framework to guide organizations in better demonstrating links between these areas. The document advises that audit committees should examine non-financial information and ask management questions to understand the organization's <IR> journey and address challenges in reliability, credibility and assurance of reporting.
As part of its ongoing initiatives in not-for-profit reporting, the Institute has published the fourth edition of ‘Enhancing not-for-profit annual and financial reporting’, which was first launched in 2007. The guidance is a tool designed specifically for the NFP sector to attain best practice in their annual and financial reports, as well as providing an overview of applicable legislation and resources.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was formed in 2001 to develop global accounting standards called International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Over 40 years, the vision of a single set of global accounting standards has become a reality with over 125 jurisdictions now requiring IFRS for public companies. Adoption of IFRS aims to increase comparability between companies, reduce financial reporting costs, and enable more efficient allocation of capital across borders through improved transparency and accountability in financial reporting.
The document discusses the AASB Framework and amendments made by AASB CF 2013-1. Key points include:
1. AASB CF 2013-1 replaces guidance on the objective of general purpose financial reporting and qualitative characteristics of useful financial information in the Framework.
2. The amendments are effective for periods ending on or after 20 December 2013, with earlier application allowed.
3. The main amendments replace guidance in the Framework on the objective and qualitative characteristics with an appendix from the Framework, and withdraw SAC 2.
This document provides information about the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, including the roles of the International Federation of Accountants and International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants in developing and maintaining high-quality international ethics standards. It summarizes the key changes between the 2018 and 2016 editions of the Code, such as restructuring the Code to improve navigation and incorporating revisions related to responding to non-compliance, long association of personnel with audit clients, and pressure to breach fundamental principles.
Danielle Jeffries IPSAS/IFRS Presentation to Delegates of the Nigerian Govern...Jeffries & Associates
This document discusses the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), the global organization for the accountancy profession. Some key points:
- IFAC has 173 members and associates in 129 countries representing over 2.5 million accountants. It establishes international standards for ethics, auditing, accounting education and public sector accounting.
- Membership in IFAC is open to professional accountancy organizations that meet criteria in the IFAC Bylaws and support IFAC's mission.
- The document also provides information on Nigeria's implementation dates for International Public Sector Accounting Standards, as well as definitions and objectives of concepts in the Conceptual Framework developed by the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board.
The document provides guidance for not-for-profit organizations (NFPs) on enhancing their annual and financial reporting. It summarizes recommendations from an earlier report for improving NFP reporting in areas such as objectives, governance, performance indicators, and financial information. The guidance includes a checklist based on Global Reporting Initiative principles for making NFP reports more transparent, inclusive, and complete. The checklist can help NFPs assess whether their annual reports adequately explain their objectives and activities, governance arrangements, and use clear language.
Are traditional financial reports still a valid part of organisational communication and accountability? Or has the financial report become an impenetrable collection of numbers and words, prepared only for compliance purposes, and only understood by a few technical elite? Is financial reporting keeping up with the increasingly complex demands of business? What effect is digital disruption having?
Noise, Numbers and Cut-Through looks at the effectiveness of financial reporting as a communication tool and responds to these questions by examining the experiences of two leading companies and their assault against disclosure overload.
Learn more: http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/futureinc
Dankwambo transition to ipsas and their impact on transparency, a case study ...icgfmconference
The document summarizes Nigeria's transition to adopting International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). It discusses Nigeria conducting a gap analysis between its existing accounting standards and IPSAS requirements. Several gaps were identified, including issues around the legal framework, accounting for external assistance, consolidation of controlled entities, and timeliness of financial reporting. Nigeria developed a work program to address the gaps through actions like consolidating controlled entity cash flows and improving timeliness of financial statement submission. Successful adoption of IPSAS requires conditions like a sound cash-based accounting system, political support, technical capacity, and automated information systems.
The document summarizes a conference held by the Banking Environment Initiative (BEI) in Hong Kong on June 24, 2014. Antony Jenkins, CEO of Barclays, called on banks to work with companies to promote sustainable production, especially in agriculture. Members committed to broaden the BEI's work to include more banks and companies in Asia. They also committed to build on the BEI's partnership with consumer goods companies through the Soft Commodities Compact to combat deforestation in supply chains by 2020.
This document discusses the adoption of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) in Nigeria. It notes that Nigeria approved adopting IPSAS in 2010 to improve financial reporting and bring it in line with global standards. IPSAS is expected to increase accountability and transparency in the public sector by providing more meaningful information for decision makers. However, some challenges remain in fully implementing IPSAS, including the expense of adoption and Nigeria's history of using cash-based accounting in the public sector. The document examines the expectations, benefits and challenges of adopting IPSAS in Nigeria to enhance accountability, transparency, and comparability of financial reporting practices with international standards.
ICAEW works with national accountancy institutes around the world to build their capacity and strengthen the accountancy profession in their countries on a sustainable long-term basis. Through twinning arrangements and capacity building projects, ICAEW shares its experiences and expertise to help institutes improve areas like professional qualifications, continuing education, audit oversight, and governance. Examples of successful projects include helping update Bangladesh's qualifications to meet international standards, developing Botswana's first professional accountancy qualification, and establishing Croatia's audit oversight procedures. The goal is for institutes to meet international benchmarks and standards over the long run.
Private Equity Investment in Africa - In Support of Inclusive and Green Growt...asafeiran
!e African Development Bank Group uses Private Equity
Funds to invest in a diverse range of African enterprises,
supporting them in their expansion and giving them the capital and the expertise to grow, creating jobs and driving economic growth. !e funds to which the Bank has committed are invested in 294 individual companies across the continent.
The document discusses International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which are a set of global accounting standards intended to make company financial statements consistent, transparent, and comparable worldwide. IFRS are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and specify how companies must maintain records and report expenses, income, and financial position. Over 160 countries require public companies to use IFRS to increase transparency and efficiency in global financial markets, though the U.S. and China use their own standards. There are currently 16 IFRS standards addressing topics like financial instruments, revenue recognition, and leases.
ADAA is primarily responsible for enhancing and promoting transparency and accountability across Abu Dhabi government and public entities ensuring that these subject entities are managing and utilizing their resources and funds efficiently, effectively, economically, ethically and in alignment with achieving the overall vision of Abu Dhabi.
The document discusses Thailand's efforts to become the number 1 medical hub of Asia. It notes that Thailand already has a strong healthcare infrastructure and reputation for skilled medical professionals. The Thai government is supporting policies to strengthen Thailand's position as a regional medical hub through its Thailand 4.0 policy and 2016-2025 Strategic Plan. Factors like rising healthcare demand from Thailand's aging population, strong medical facilities, and attractive investment incentives are also helping Thailand become the top medical hub in the region.
This document provides information about chartered accountants and accounting bodies worldwide. It discusses that chartered accountants have been a mark of excellence in business for over 150 years, advising organizations and effectively managing finances. It also summarizes the major international and national accounting standard-setting and auditing standard-setting bodies, as well as professional accounting bodies in different countries like the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Bangladesh and the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
International financial reporting standards (ifrs)Nikhil Priya
The document provides information about International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS):
1. IFRS are established by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to develop a single set of high-quality global accounting standards.
2. The objectives of IASB are to develop high-quality understandable global standards, promote their use, and work to converge national standards with IFRS.
3. Adopting IFRS allows multinational businesses to use the same accounting practices worldwide, facilitates comparison of financial statements globally, and enables access to international capital markets.
Access Bank reported strong financial results for the 2009 fiscal year. Profit before tax increased 48% to N28.1 billion, driven by growth in core banking operations. Loan portfolio diversified across sectors with trade as the largest contributor. The institutional banking division recorded the highest profit before tax of N11.4 billion and managed the largest portion of total bank assets. Overall, all business segments improved financial performance compared to the previous fiscal year.
Emergence of international financial reporting standard in india accounting s...Alexander Decker
This document discusses the emergence of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in India's accounting system. It notes that globalization has increased demand for comparable financial reporting across borders. While basic accounting principles are widely accepted, application differences between countries create non-optimal information for financial statement users. Adopting IFRS would help harmonize rules and allow easier cross-border investments and business decisions. The document examines rationales for India adopting IFRS, differences between IFRS and Indian standards, and challenges of convergence, such as conflicting regulations and technical preparedness. Overall, a common global reporting language using IFRS could improve capital allocation and investor confidence internationally.
- Access Bank Plc is a leading Nigerian bank with operations across Nigeria and 8 other African countries, as well as the UK.
- In 2010, the bank recorded a 564% increase in profit before tax to N16.1 billion, up from N3.48 billion in 2009, driven by strong performance from its Nigerian operations.
- The bank has five major business segments: institutional banking, commercial banking, investment banking, retail banking, and transaction services. It serves over 2 million customers through 148 branches across its markets.
Republic of Moldova - Competitiveness recommendationsOECDglobal
The document discusses improving access to finance for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the Republic of Moldova. It will undergo a peer review process to receive feedback and recommendations. The summary is:
1) Access to finance is a major challenge for SMEs in Moldova due to an underdeveloped legal framework, limited sources of funding, and low financial literacy.
2) Moldova's action plan seeks to strengthen regulations, expand credit information sharing, and improve financial skills to address these issues.
3) During the peer review, Moldova will receive input on guidelines to further enhance laws and regulations, diversify financing options such as microcredit and leasing, and better support SME business
This document provides an overview of integrated reporting (<IR>) and the role of audit committees. It discusses the benefits of <IR> in providing a holistic view of an organization's strategy, governance, performance and prospects. The International Integrated Reporting Council developed a framework to guide organizations in better demonstrating links between these areas. The document advises that audit committees should examine non-financial information and ask management questions to understand the organization's <IR> journey and address challenges in reliability, credibility and assurance of reporting.
As part of its ongoing initiatives in not-for-profit reporting, the Institute has published the fourth edition of ‘Enhancing not-for-profit annual and financial reporting’, which was first launched in 2007. The guidance is a tool designed specifically for the NFP sector to attain best practice in their annual and financial reports, as well as providing an overview of applicable legislation and resources.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was formed in 2001 to develop global accounting standards called International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Over 40 years, the vision of a single set of global accounting standards has become a reality with over 125 jurisdictions now requiring IFRS for public companies. Adoption of IFRS aims to increase comparability between companies, reduce financial reporting costs, and enable more efficient allocation of capital across borders through improved transparency and accountability in financial reporting.
The document discusses the AASB Framework and amendments made by AASB CF 2013-1. Key points include:
1. AASB CF 2013-1 replaces guidance on the objective of general purpose financial reporting and qualitative characteristics of useful financial information in the Framework.
2. The amendments are effective for periods ending on or after 20 December 2013, with earlier application allowed.
3. The main amendments replace guidance in the Framework on the objective and qualitative characteristics with an appendix from the Framework, and withdraw SAC 2.
This document provides information about the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, including the roles of the International Federation of Accountants and International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants in developing and maintaining high-quality international ethics standards. It summarizes the key changes between the 2018 and 2016 editions of the Code, such as restructuring the Code to improve navigation and incorporating revisions related to responding to non-compliance, long association of personnel with audit clients, and pressure to breach fundamental principles.
Danielle Jeffries IPSAS/IFRS Presentation to Delegates of the Nigerian Govern...Jeffries & Associates
This document discusses the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), the global organization for the accountancy profession. Some key points:
- IFAC has 173 members and associates in 129 countries representing over 2.5 million accountants. It establishes international standards for ethics, auditing, accounting education and public sector accounting.
- Membership in IFAC is open to professional accountancy organizations that meet criteria in the IFAC Bylaws and support IFAC's mission.
- The document also provides information on Nigeria's implementation dates for International Public Sector Accounting Standards, as well as definitions and objectives of concepts in the Conceptual Framework developed by the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board.
The document provides guidance for not-for-profit organizations (NFPs) on enhancing their annual and financial reporting. It summarizes recommendations from an earlier report for improving NFP reporting in areas such as objectives, governance, performance indicators, and financial information. The guidance includes a checklist based on Global Reporting Initiative principles for making NFP reports more transparent, inclusive, and complete. The checklist can help NFPs assess whether their annual reports adequately explain their objectives and activities, governance arrangements, and use clear language.
Are traditional financial reports still a valid part of organisational communication and accountability? Or has the financial report become an impenetrable collection of numbers and words, prepared only for compliance purposes, and only understood by a few technical elite? Is financial reporting keeping up with the increasingly complex demands of business? What effect is digital disruption having?
Noise, Numbers and Cut-Through looks at the effectiveness of financial reporting as a communication tool and responds to these questions by examining the experiences of two leading companies and their assault against disclosure overload.
Learn more: http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/futureinc
Dankwambo transition to ipsas and their impact on transparency, a case study ...icgfmconference
The document summarizes Nigeria's transition to adopting International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). It discusses Nigeria conducting a gap analysis between its existing accounting standards and IPSAS requirements. Several gaps were identified, including issues around the legal framework, accounting for external assistance, consolidation of controlled entities, and timeliness of financial reporting. Nigeria developed a work program to address the gaps through actions like consolidating controlled entity cash flows and improving timeliness of financial statement submission. Successful adoption of IPSAS requires conditions like a sound cash-based accounting system, political support, technical capacity, and automated information systems.
The document summarizes a conference held by the Banking Environment Initiative (BEI) in Hong Kong on June 24, 2014. Antony Jenkins, CEO of Barclays, called on banks to work with companies to promote sustainable production, especially in agriculture. Members committed to broaden the BEI's work to include more banks and companies in Asia. They also committed to build on the BEI's partnership with consumer goods companies through the Soft Commodities Compact to combat deforestation in supply chains by 2020.
This document discusses the adoption of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) in Nigeria. It notes that Nigeria approved adopting IPSAS in 2010 to improve financial reporting and bring it in line with global standards. IPSAS is expected to increase accountability and transparency in the public sector by providing more meaningful information for decision makers. However, some challenges remain in fully implementing IPSAS, including the expense of adoption and Nigeria's history of using cash-based accounting in the public sector. The document examines the expectations, benefits and challenges of adopting IPSAS in Nigeria to enhance accountability, transparency, and comparability of financial reporting practices with international standards.
ICAEW works with national accountancy institutes around the world to build their capacity and strengthen the accountancy profession in their countries on a sustainable long-term basis. Through twinning arrangements and capacity building projects, ICAEW shares its experiences and expertise to help institutes improve areas like professional qualifications, continuing education, audit oversight, and governance. Examples of successful projects include helping update Bangladesh's qualifications to meet international standards, developing Botswana's first professional accountancy qualification, and establishing Croatia's audit oversight procedures. The goal is for institutes to meet international benchmarks and standards over the long run.
This document discusses the changing role and expectations of Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) and the need to prepare professional accountants for finance leadership positions. It outlines five key principles that define the CFO role: 1) being an effective organizational leader, 2) balancing stewardship and business partnership responsibilities, 3) acting as an integrator and navigator for the organization, 4) leading the finance and accounting function effectively, and 5) bringing professional qualities to the role. The document argues that professional accountancy qualifications provide an advantage for the CFO role by combining technical expertise with business acumen and ethics. It calls for professional accountancy organizations and employers to review how they prepare accountants to acquire the necessary skills and competencies for senior finance
Cash budget is an estimation of cash inflows and outflows over a period of time. It allows businesses to determine how much credit can be extended and assess liquidity. It is important for planning, forecasting future cash needs, maintaining adequate cash balances, controlling expenses, evaluating performance, and testing proposed expansions. Key benefits include planning efficient cash use, arranging funds in advance, and following a sound dividend policy.
The document summarizes the 18th World Congress of Accountants held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Some key details:
- A record-breaking 6,050 delegates from 134 countries attended, far surpassing the 81 attendees at the first congress in 1904.
- The theme was "Accountants: Sustaining Value Creation" which focused on sustainability and integrated reporting.
- Speakers from over 40 countries discussed topics like integrated reporting, standards convergence, and challenges for small accounting practices.
- Sustainability initiatives included providing reusable water bottles and contributing funds to plant 600 trees to offset carbon emissions.
- The congress brought together accounting leaders and organizations from around the world to discuss issues facing the
The document summarizes the 18th World Congress of Accountants held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Some key details:
- A record-breaking 6,050 delegates from 134 countries attended, far surpassing the 81 attendees at the first congress in 1904.
- The theme was "Accountants: Sustaining Value Creation" which focused on sustainability and integrated reporting.
- Speakers from over 40 countries discussed topics like integrated reporting, standards convergence, and challenges for small accounting practices.
- Sustainability initiatives included providing reusable water bottles and contributing funds to plant 600 trees to offset carbon emissions.
- The congress brought together accounting leaders and organizations from around the world to discuss issues facing the
This document discusses sustainability reporting by Woolworths, an Australian company. It examines how Woolworths has evolved their sustainability reporting and integrated reporting to account for their environmental and social impacts. Woolworths sees their existence as directly linked to the environment and community. They have programs in place to engage stakeholders and reconcile demands from suppliers, communities, and society. Woolworths aims for long term success that does not come at the expense of society, economy or environment through managing their impacts and achieving beneficial long lasting change.
The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) works to resolve emerging accounting issues for the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The EITF researches issues like accounting for 9/11 and unrecognized tax benefits. For unrecognized tax benefits, the EITF provides guidance that the liability will reduce net operating losses on the income statement or be reported as a liability on the balance sheet depending on if the losses have been used. The EITF's work impacts companies' financial reporting.
The document discusses the future of the accounting profession and the role of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN) in maintaining global relevance over the next 50 years. There are numerous drivers of change that will impact the skills required of professional accountants, such as technology advancements. ICAN aims to produce world-class accountants and regulate standards. To remain globally competitive, ICAN must invest in technology platforms, research, and partnerships with international bodies. If ICAN adopts the roles outlined, it can position itself as a prime competitor to globally recognized accounting bodies like ACCA in the coming decades.
PP AVCN : What benefits can a trong accounting profession bring to developing...Han Nguyen
A strong accounting profession can be defined as a statutory professional body that manages accounting fields through education and certification programs. Developing strong accounting professions can benefit developing countries in several ways. It can help integrate their markets into the global economy, improve corporate governance and financial transparency, and support the development of local capital markets. However, many developing countries still face challenges in fully establishing strong accounting professions, such as outdated accounting standards, incomplete regulatory systems, weak auditing firms, and accounting practices that prioritize tax avoidance over accuracy and transparency. Fully realizing the economic benefits requires continued efforts to modernize standards, strengthen oversight, and promote the accounting profession.
Similar to Public sector financial reporting paper (20)
Australia and New Zealand perform well in global measures of corruption, and both countries trade on reputations for honesty and integrity.
However, rates of corruption are reported to be rising and we are trading increasingly often with countries that are considered to be highly corrupt.
This future[inc] paper examines what is currently being done, and what should be done to mitigate corruption in Australia and New Zealand.
The Chartered Accountants Program is your pathway to becoming a CA, a widely recognised business qualification that’s sought after by employers across industries. Learn more about the Program, its content and how to apply.
Revolutionising Reporting: Why Care? is the first in the Future Directions series of the future[inc]. Developed out of a series of meetings globally and two stakeholder events with a range of directors, investors and practitioners held in Auckland and Sydney in March.
There are historic changes coming in what the financial statement auditor will say publicly in their report. For listed entities there will be a section where the auditor explains the main areas they looked at in their audit of that company for the year, and a summary of the audit procedures they undertook to address the matter.
Since auditing began, consistency in how auditors report to shareholders has been a predominant feature. Audit is complex, technical work and consistency in explaining the role and the results of the audit work has taken prevalence.
This is being turned on its head! The increasing demands for transparency of process, to help justify trust, has led to the introduction, for the first time, of unique commentary in the audit report to shareholders. A major change to market communication.
These new requirements will be effective from December 2016 year end’s, though many firms and companies will be trialling it this year. Download your copy.
Digital currencies like Bitcoin have grown significantly since being created in 2008. Bitcoin aims to provide an alternative payment system that is instantaneous, safe, and avoids high transaction fees. While over $3 billion worth of Bitcoins are now in circulation and many retailers accept Bitcoin, its future is still uncertain. Bitcoin offers benefits like lower costs but also poses risks due to its volatility. Governments and regulators are concerned about issues like consumer protection and how to apply tax rules to digital currencies. As more businesses and people adopt Bitcoin, it will be important to address these challenges to help digital currencies develop in a responsible way.
Australia is known for our ‘fair-go’ approach, but are we still delivering? Are we getting the balance right between risk and return as a nation? future[inc]’s latest thought leadership insight starts the conversation around how much risk we should expect government to regulate, how policy makers can provide equality of opportunity and what impact these decisions are likely to have on growth. This paper is the second in a series looking at the changing nature of policy-making in Australia. Download your copy.
Is policy making measuring up: Rethinking how we measure the success of a nation explores how global demands have changed the way we think and measure success and what the results really mean.
Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand has developed a free guide to help members operating in the Australian not-for-profit sector. It’s a guide for charities registered with the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission and will assist members detail the obligations for not-for-profits in relation to record-keeping, reporting and auditing. More information is available at charteredaccountants.com.au/ACNCguide
This publication discuss the opportunities and challenges for Australia and New Zealand in developing closer ties with Asia in business, education and practice. It is the fifth publication in our Academic Leadership Series: charteredaccountants.com.au/academic
Here are 12 skills to help you respond to conflict constructively, and turn it into an opportunity. To learn more about the fundamental principles of conflict resolution visit www.charteredaccountantsanz.com/cpe and find the Conflict Management Series in the Personal Effectiveness and Leadership section of the Chartered Accountants Continuing Professional Education Program.
With the continued regulatory focus on asset values, the Institute has released a guide for year end reporting with an overview of the key concepts of impairment testing and why it is important.
Are you thinking about a career in business as a Chartered Accountant? Do you know the employers that offer graduate, vacation or cadetships in your state and Australia-wide? Get all the answers with the free Chartered Accountants Employment Guide.
The Employment Guide helps you to understand the different types of organisations that offer quality accounting positions. These include large corporations, the Big 4, small and mid-tier accounting organisations, not-for-profit and government.
The guide features hundreds of employer profiles divided by state. Each profile includes:
• A detailed description of the organisation
• The type of work placements available. e.g. Graduate, vacation, cadetships, part-time and casual work.
• How to apply and contact details
• Key dates for applications (if available).
The guide also indicates the employers that will consider recruiting international students. In addition, it features practical career and recruitment information, along with profiles and videos of Chartered Accountants sharing their stories.
The paper 'Why business ethics matter to your bottom line' looks at the need for businesses to build institutional integrity into an organisation to support employees in making ethical choices.
The carbon market is growing, heightening the focus on organisations’ reporting and assurance of greenhouse gas emissions. With this in mind, the Institute has released a new guide for directors on the benefits of assuring GHG emissions.
To help audit firms consider the effectiveness of their quality controls and processes, the Institute has released the paper, Sharing experiences on audit quality. It is based on the experiences of large firms who have made enhancements to their own audit quality control systems.
Technological advances and the rise of online education offerings, including massive open online courses, are changing the higher education landscape. The Institute’s new academic thought-leadership paper, The Virtual University: Impact on Australian Accounting and Business Education, explores the potential impact of this transformation on business and accounting education.
Do you work in auditing? Check out our new guide on documenting the exercise of professional scepticism, with a series of questions for different members of the engagement team to use as a reference tool. We have developed this with the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. The level of professional scepticism exercised by auditors is one of the focus areas identified by regulators globally. More information is available at charteredaccountants.com.au/professionalscepticism
In the Guide you will find information about organisations offering
accounting positions to students and who are accredited to train and
employ Chartered Accountants.
The Institute’s new publication, Preserving capital market confidence through audit quality, is based on research into the audit practices of major accounting firms in Australia. It assesses the perceptions of the main drivers of audit quality in the firms, including professional scepticism, the sustainability of the profession, effectiveness of communication, and audit committees. A variety of respondent groups were involved, including partners, managers, newly qualified accountants and graduates.
More from Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (20)
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
OJP data from firms like Vicinity Jobs have emerged as a complement to traditional sources of labour demand data, such as the Job Vacancy and Wages Survey (JVWS). Ibrahim Abuallail, PhD Candidate, University of Ottawa, presented research relating to bias in OJPs and a proposed approach to effectively adjust OJP data to complement existing official data (such as from the JVWS) and improve the measurement of labour demand.
In a tight labour market, job-seekers gain bargaining power and leverage it into greater job quality—at least, that’s the conventional wisdom.
Michael, LMIC Economist, presented findings that reveal a weakened relationship between labour market tightness and job quality indicators following the pandemic. Labour market tightness coincided with growth in real wages for only a portion of workers: those in low-wage jobs requiring little education. Several factors—including labour market composition, worker and employer behaviour, and labour market practices—have contributed to the absence of worker benefits. These will be investigated further in future work.
Independent Study - College of Wooster Research (2023-2024) FDI, Culture, Glo...AntoniaOwensDetwiler
"Does Foreign Direct Investment Negatively Affect Preservation of Culture in the Global South? Case Studies in Thailand and Cambodia."
Do elements of globalization, such as Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), negatively affect the ability of countries in the Global South to preserve their culture? This research aims to answer this question by employing a cross-sectional comparative case study analysis utilizing methods of difference. Thailand and Cambodia are compared as they are in the same region and have a similar culture. The metric of difference between Thailand and Cambodia is their ability to preserve their culture. This ability is operationalized by their respective attitudes towards FDI; Thailand imposes stringent regulations and limitations on FDI while Cambodia does not hesitate to accept most FDI and imposes fewer limitations. The evidence from this study suggests that FDI from globally influential countries with high gross domestic products (GDPs) (e.g. China, U.S.) challenges the ability of countries with lower GDPs (e.g. Cambodia) to protect their culture. Furthermore, the ability, or lack thereof, of the receiving countries to protect their culture is amplified by the existence and implementation of restrictive FDI policies imposed by their governments.
My study abroad in Bali, Indonesia, inspired this research topic as I noticed how globalization is changing the culture of its people. I learned their language and way of life which helped me understand the beauty and importance of cultural preservation. I believe we could all benefit from learning new perspectives as they could help us ideate solutions to contemporary issues and empathize with others.
[4:55 p.m.] Bryan Oates
OJPs are becoming a critical resource for policy-makers and researchers who study the labour market. LMIC continues to work with Vicinity Jobs’ data on OJPs, which can be explored in our Canadian Job Trends Dashboard. Valuable insights have been gained through our analysis of OJP data, including LMIC research lead
Suzanne Spiteri’s recent report on improving the quality and accessibility of job postings to reduce employment barriers for neurodivergent people.
Decoding job postings: Improving accessibility for neurodivergent job seekers
Improving the quality and accessibility of job postings is one way to reduce employment barriers for neurodivergent people.
^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Duba...mayaclinic18
Whatsapp (+971581248768) Buy Abortion Pills In Dubai/ Qatar/Kuwait/Doha/Abu Dhabi/Alain/RAK City/Satwa/Al Ain/Abortion Pills For Sale In Qatar, Doha. Abu az Zuluf. Abu Thaylah. Ad Dawhah al Jadidah. Al Arish, Al Bida ash Sharqiyah, Al Ghanim, Al Ghuwariyah, Qatari, Abu Dhabi, Dubai.. WHATSAPP +971)581248768 Abortion Pills / Cytotec Tablets Available in Dubai, Sharjah, Abudhabi, Ajman, Alain, Fujeira, Ras Al Khaima, Umm Al Quwain., UAE, buy cytotec in Dubai– Where I can buy abortion pills in Dubai,+971582071918where I can buy abortion pills in Abudhabi +971)581248768 , where I can buy abortion pills in Sharjah,+97158207191 8where I can buy abortion pills in Ajman, +971)581248768 where I can buy abortion pills in Umm al Quwain +971)581248768 , where I can buy abortion pills in Fujairah +971)581248768 , where I can buy abortion pills in Ras al Khaimah +971)581248768 , where I can buy abortion pills in Alain+971)581248768 , where I can buy abortion pills in UAE +971)581248768 we are providing cytotec 200mg abortion pill in dubai, uae.Medication abortion offers an alternative to Surgical Abortion for women in the early weeks of pregnancy. Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman Fujairah Ras Al Khaimah%^^%$Zone1:+971)581248768’][* Legit & Safe #Abortion #Pills #For #Sale In #Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharjah Deira Ajman
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
Vicinity Jobs’ data includes more than three million 2023 OJPs and thousands of skills. Most skills appear in less than 0.02% of job postings, so most postings rely on a small subset of commonly used terms, like teamwork.
Laura Adkins-Hackett, Economist, LMIC, and Sukriti Trehan, Data Scientist, LMIC, presented their research exploring trends in the skills listed in OJPs to develop a deeper understanding of in-demand skills. This research project uses pointwise mutual information and other methods to extract more information about common skills from the relationships between skills, occupations and regions.
Solution Manual For Financial Accounting, 8th Canadian Edition 2024, by Libby...Donc Test
Solution Manual For Financial Accounting, 8th Canadian Edition 2024, by Libby, Hodge, Verified Chapters 1 - 13, Complete Newest Version Solution Manual For Financial Accounting, 8th Canadian Edition by Libby, Hodge, Verified Chapters 1 - 13, Complete Newest Version Solution Manual For Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Chapters Download Stuvia Solution Manual For Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Ebook Download Stuvia Solution Manual For Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Solution Manual For Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Download Stuvia Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Chapters Download Stuvia Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Ebook Download Stuvia Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Download Stuvia
Seminar: Gender Board Diversity through Ownership NetworksGRAPE
Seminar on gender diversity spillovers through ownership networks at FAME|GRAPE. Presenting novel research. Studies in economics and management using econometrics methods.
2. Disclaimer
This publication has been prepared for the
Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia by
independent financial reporting consultant, and
former member of the International Accounting
Standards Board, Warren McGregor. While every
effort has been made to ensure content reflects
current legislation and regulation, neither the
Institute nor Warren McGregor shall be liable on
any ground whatsoever to any party in respect of
decisions or actions they may take as a result of
using this publication, nor in respect of any errors
in, or omissions from it. The information contained
in this publication is a general commentary only
and should not be used, relied upon, or treated as
a substitute for specific professional advice.
Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia
The Institute is the professional body for Chartered Accountants in Australia and
members operating throughout the world.
Representing more than 72,000 current and future professionals and business
leaders, the Institute has a pivotal role in upholding financial integrity in society.
Members strive to uphold the profession’s commitment to ethics and quality in
everything they do, alongside an unwavering dedication to act in the public interest.
Chartered Accountants hold diverse positions across the business community, as
well as in professional services, government, not-for-profit, education and academia.
The leadership and business acumen of members underpin the Institute’s deep
knowledge base in a broad range of policy areas impacting the Australian economy
and domestic and international capital markets.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia was established by Royal Charter
in 1928 and today has more than 60,000 members and 12,000 talented graduates
working and undertaking the Chartered Accountants Program.
The Institute is a founding member of the Global Accounting Alliance (GAA), which
is an international coalition of accounting bodies and an 800,000-strong network of
professionals and leaders worldwide.
charteredaccountants.com.au
Copyright
A person or organisation that acquires or purchases
this product from the Institute of Chartered
Accountants Australia may reproduce and amend
these documents for their own use or use within
their business. Apart from such use, copyright is
strictly reserved, and no part of this publication
may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any
means within the written permission of the Institute
of Chartered Accountants Australia.
It’s time...
for global, high quality public sector financial reporting
Published: May 2013
Published by: Institute of Chartered Accountants
Australia, 33 Erskine Street Sydney NSW 2000
ISBN: 978 19212 45961
ABN 50 084 642 571 The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia. Incorporated in Australia. Members’ liability limited. 0313-55
3. Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia 3
4 5 6
Foreword Executive summary Introduction
7 8 10
Where are we now? What is the vision? How should the vision
be achieved?
13 15
Charting a course to
achieve the vision
Are we up to the challenge?
Contents
4. It’s time...for global, high quality public sector financial reporting4
The global financial crisis and ensuing
uncertainty about the strength of global
economic frameworks highlighted
disparities between public and private
sector reporting standards. Sovereign
debt issues that continue to plague several
countries bring to light the inherent need to
improve government reporting, in particular.
This publication seeks to influence the
growing debate on developing greater
consistency of transparency and
accountability within financial reporting
internationally. Irrespective of sector or
operating environment, scrutiny of financial
reporting needs to be consistent in delivering
more efficient economic outcomes.
It’s pleasing to see some jurisdictions
around the world have taken steps towards
reducing the disparity between the quality
of reporting among the two sectors,
however regulators and standard-setters
need to continue to advocate for a more
streamlined, uniform approach globally.
Governments raise debt in the same way
organisations in the corporate sector do,
and, as a result, need to be held to the
same degree of accountability. Deficiencies
within public sector reporting processes
are fundamentally driving the push towards
the development and adoption of high
quality public sector accounting standards.
In releasing this publication to our
international peers, the Institute would
like to express gratitude and appreciation
to Mr Warren McGregor, whose insights,
knowledge and experience has shaped
this publication.
I trust It’s time...for global, high quality
public sector financial reporting will
encourage greater commitment towards
improving financial reporting standards
among the global public sector.
Tim Gullifer FCA
President 2013
Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia
Foreword
5. They charged the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) and the World Bank with
keeping them updated on the issues.
This follows calls from the IMF and the
World Bank for more widespread adoption
of International Public Sector Standards
(IPSAS), and a recent report by the
European Commission to the Council of
the European Union and the European
Parliament on the suitability of IPSASs for
adoption by EU Member States. These and
other recent developments underpin the
observation of the newly appointed chief
executive of the International Federation
of Accountants (IFAC), Fayez Choudhury,
in a recent interview that ‘the day has
come for global public sector financial
reporting standards’.
Successfully pursuing financial reporting
improvements at a national level by
harnessing resources at a global level
has been demonstrated by the IPSASB’s
private sector counterpart, the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Such
improvements not only generate benefits
to stakeholders and others by providing
more transparent information about the
financial performance and financial
position of reporting entities, but also
enhance financial statement users’ ability
to compare the financial performance and
financial position of those reporting entities
across borders. With the emergence of
the IPSASB as a serious international
standard setter and the evident success
of the IASB, there exists an opportunity
both to accelerate the momentum of the
IPSASB and to broaden the benefits of
this global financial reporting revolution by
positioning the boards within a common
institutional architecture and having them
develop standards by reference to a
common financial reporting framework.
This vision of a global standard setting
architecture covering both the private
and public sectors is presented in this
paper. It is premised on the fact that
reporting entities face common economic
phenomena and the international
accounting standard setters have a
common mandate, i.e. to improve the
quality of financial reporting with the
objective of enhancing the decision making
of the users of financial statements about
the allocation of scarce resources and
assessments of accountability.
Executive
summary
Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia 5
There is an emerging consensus of the need for improvements in the
quality of financial reporting by governments and their agencies around
the world, and there is growing acknowledgement of the key role that the
International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) has to
play in bringing this about. At their meeting in Moscow in February 2013,
the G20 finance ministers and Central Bank governors observed that
transparency and comparability of public sector financial reporting is
one of the issues that need to be taken into account in pursing their goal
of strengthening the public sector balance sheet.
6. It’s time...for global, high quality public sector financial reporting6
As we observe the rapid take-up of
International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRSs) by countries around
the world, the prospect of there being
a single set of high-quality global
accounting standards used by companies
in all countries becomes ever more
real. The benefits of this development
have been extolled for some time now;
enhanced cross border capital flows,
improved capital market efficiency,
lower costs of capital, etc., and there is
mounting evidence that they are being
achieved1
. The need for a set of global
accounting standards has been reinforced
by the global financial crisis, which both
demonstrated the interconnectedness
of the world’s financial markets and
highlighted the demand for transparent
and comparable financial information
within and between countries. As we
shall discuss, this need extends beyond
the private sector to the public sector.
The need for globalisation of financial
reporting has to date been focused
principally on the for-profit private sector
and has been driven in recent years by the
IFRS Foundation, through the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
However, the benefits of globalisation
of financial reporting by public sector
entities are increasingly being recognised
and efforts to establish a set of global
accounting standards for the public sector
are being pursued by the International
Public Sector Accounting Standards Board
(IPSASB) of the International Federation
of Accountants (IFAC). A recent paper by
the International Monetary Fund highlights
the present inadequate reporting and
accountability by many governments around
the world and, inter alia, recommends
greater use of International Public Sector
Accounting Standards (IPSAS) to help
remedy the situation2
. However, like the
IASB’s predecessor body, the International
Accounting Standards Committee (IASC),
the IPSASB faces significant constraints in
pursuing its mission.
In November 2011, the IASB and the
IFAC entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) to strengthen their
co-operation in developing private and
public sector accounting standards3
.
While the MOU focuses on co-operation
as the IASB and the IPSASB pursue their
separate mandates, the rationale
underpinning the MOU, a common belief in
high-quality, transparent financial reporting,
provides a foundation for greater integration
of their activities. The following comments
by the IASB chairman, Hans Hoogervorst,
at a recent conference in the Netherlands
highlight this commonality of purpose:
‘One has only to look at the insurance
industry to see how essential proper
accounting standards are. Currently
IFRS does not have a full-blown
standard for insurance. As a result,
financial reporting by the industry
is riddled with non-GAAP measures
and there is a serious lack of
comparability. Because the industry’s
reporting lacks the underlying rigour
of uniform accounting, investors
demand a higher price for capital to
make up for the lack of transparency.’
‘Public sector accounting also
demonstrates the primitive anarchy
that results without the discipline and
transparency that good financial
reporting provides. While the IPSASB
has created good standards for the
public sector, based on IFRS, they are
used only haphazardly. Around the
world, governments give very
incomplete information about the huge,
unfunded social security liabilities they
have incurred. Many executives in the
private sector would end up in jail if
they reported like Ministers of Finance,
and rightly so.’4
This paper endeavours to make the case for
coordinated action to achieve globalisation of
financial reporting across both sectors, and to
achieve it in a way that results in comparable
reporting between the sectors. It presents
a vision of an institutional framework and
a financial reporting framework that could
achieve that outcome, and discusses how
this vision could become a reality.
Introduction
1. See Brown, P and Tarca, A. 2012, ‘Ten
Years of IFRS: Practitioners’ comments
and suggestions for research’, Australian
Accounting Review, December, pp319-
330 and IFRS Foundation 2012 Report
to the Trustees of the IFRS Foundation:
IFRS Foundation staff analysis of the
SEC Final Staff Report – Work Plan for
the consideration of incorporating IFRS
into the financial reporting system for
US issuers, Appendix The Case for Global
Accounting Standards: Arguments
and Evidence, pp 68-84, accessible at
www.ifrs.org/Use-around-the-world/
Global-convergence/Convergence-
with-US-GAAP/Documents/Analysis-
of-SEC-Final-Staff-Report.pdf.
2. InternationalMonetaryFund2012,Fiscal
Transparency, Accountability and Risk.
author’s COMMENT: Concerns
about the current lack of transparency
and comparability of public sector
financial reporting were undoubtedly
behind the observation of the G20
Finance Ministers and Central Bank
Governors at their meeting in Moscow
in February 2013, that transparency
and comparability of public sector
financial reporting needs to be taken
into account in pursing their goal of
strengthening the public sector balance
sheet. See Communiqué, Meeting of
Finance Ministers and Central Bank
Governors, Moscow, 15-16 February
2013, paragraph10. Accessible at
www.g20.org/load/781209773.
3. International Accounting Standards
Board and International Federation of
Accountants, IASB and IFAC to enhance
co-operation in developing private and
public sector accounting standards,
22 November 2011. Accessible at
http://go.ifrs.org/IFACMOU.
4. Hans Hoogervorst, The imprecise world
of accounting, presentation to the
International Association for Accounting
Education & Research conference,
Amsterdam, 20 June 2012.
FOOTNOTES
7. Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia 7
The development of financial reporting
standards for the public sector has lagged
its private sector cousin and has been
the focus of attention in few national
jurisdictions. As for the private sector, the
development of public sector standards
emanated primarily from Anglo-American
countries. Australia, Canada, New
Zealand and the United States were the
early pioneers, establishing separate
standard-setting bodies through the
1980’s and early 1990’s charged with
the task of developing standards for
public sector entities. In the case of
Australia and New Zealand, the standard
setting boards took a transaction-neutral
approach to developing accounting
standards in different sectors, i.e. a given
transaction or other event is accounted
for the same way, regardless of the
nature of the entity (whether for-profit or
not-for-profit) and the sector in which it
operates, on the basis that the underlying
economics are the same5
. In addition,
both countries developed transaction-
neutral conceptual frameworks.
At an international level, the IFAC established
a Public Sector Committee (PSC) in 1986
to inter alia develop programs to improve
financial reporting in the public sector.
However, it was not until 1996 that actual
standards development work began. The
scope of that initial work was focussed
primarily on developing public sector
standards based on private sector standards
issued by the private sector IASC, to the
extent that those standards were applicable
to the public sector. This initial development
work, in a sense, mirrored the initial
development work of the IASC which had
been established in 1973 and spent its early
years ‘harmonising’ standards issued by
Anglo-American national standard setters.
In 2003, IFAC commissioned a review of
the PSC by an externally chaired review
panel6
. The review, which became known
as the Likierman Review after the external
chairman Sir Andrew Likierman, led to
the establishment of the IPSASB as an
independent board with a clear mandate
to develop and issue IPSASs.
With a new name and a renewed mandate
the IPSASB set about bringing its body of
standards up to date with those of the IASB
as well as continuing to develop standards
of particular significance to the public
sector. With the benefit of increased funding
the IPSASB has been able to improve the
currency and comprehensiveness of its body
of standards, but has struggled to keep pace
with the IASB which has been undertaking
an extensive work program of issuing new
IFRSs and revising and updating existing
IFRSs. Moreover, notwithstanding the
elevated status of the IPSASB, its improved
productivity and the significant progress
that has been made in a relatively short
period, the take-up of IPSASs around
the world while now taking place at an
increasing rate has to date been limited7
.
There are many parallels between the
evolution of the IPSASB and the evolution
of the IASC. Both bodies were children of
the worldwide accounting profession, both
had modest objectives in the early years
of their existence, both relied on voluntary
contributions from accounting professionals
who were typically employed on a full-time
basis by other organisations, both operated
on very limited budgets, and both struggled
to obtain support from their constituents for
the use of international accounting standards
in place of countries’ national accounting
standards. In short, both bodies suffered
from being part-time, resource constrained
and structured in a way that made it difficult
to achieve political legitimacy8
.
The IASC’s reincarnation as the IASB was
designed to overcome these constraints.
We believe it provides a blueprint for its
public sector counterpart.
Where are we now?
5. In June 2012 the New Zealand External
Reporting Board and the New Zealand
Accounting Standards Board issued
proposals for a new accounting standards
framework that would require certain
categories of public sector public benefit
entities to apply IPSASB standards. See
External Reporting Board, Proposals for
the New Zealand Accounting Standards
Framework, March 2012. Accessible at
www.xrb.govt.nz. Australia continues
to develop transaction-neutral standards
based on IFRSs.
6. International Federation of Accountants,
Report of the Externally Chaired Review
Panel on Governance, Role and Organisation
of the International Federation of
Accountants Public Sector Committee,
June 2004. Accessible at www.ifac.
org/sites/default/files/downloads/
PSCExternalReviewReport.doc.
7. author’s COMMENT: While a number
of intergovernmental organisations
have adopted IPSASs, for example, the
Organisation for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD) and the North
Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO),
very few countries have adopted them.
However, a number of countries are in
the process of adoption (of either cash-
based or accrual-based IPSASs) or have
undertaken to adopt them by a specified
date. For example, Brazil plans to fully
implement them in 2013, and, as noted
previously, New Zealand is proposing
to adopt them for certain public benefit
entities. In addition, the Council of the
European Union asked the European
Commission (EC) to assess the suitability
of IPSASs for EU Member States by 2012.
The EC’s Report was issued in March 2013.
While the EC did not recommend adoption
of IPSASs in member states at this point in
time, it did note that the IPSAS standards
represent an indisputable reference for
potential development of European Public
Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS). See
Report from the Commission to the Council
and the European Parliament, Towards
implementing harmonised public sector
accounting standards in Member States,
The suitability of IPSAS for the Member
States, March 2013. Accessible at http://
epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/
portal/government_finance_statistics/
documents/1_EN_ACT_part1_v5.pdf.
8. author’s COMMENT: Political
legitimacy is a difficult issue for global
organisations seeking to impact practices
in national jurisdictions. For countries
to be willing to embrace the output
of global organisations by effectively
delegating rule making authority to them,
they need to have confidence in the
efficacy of an organisations’ institutional
framework, in particular its governance
arrangements. This was an issue the IASB
and its oversight body, the IFRS Foundation
Trustees, had to address during the early
years of the organisation’s existence.
FOOTNOTES
8. It’s time...for global, high quality public sector financial reporting8
High-quality, transaction-neutral, global
financial reporting standards that are
applied by reporting entities in the private
and public sectors around the world.
We noted earlier in this paper that the IFRS
Foundation is well advanced in having
a set of high-quality global accounting
standards adopted around the world for
publicly accountable for-profit entities in
the private sector. We also noted that the
benefits of this financial reporting revolution
are beginning to be achieved. The benefits
of a similar financial reporting revolution in
the public sector are potentially significant
as demonstrated at a national level in those
countries that have already embraced
high-quality financial reporting frameworks
for public sector entities. Moreover, as the
recent IMF paper makes clear, failure to bring
about global improvements to the quality of
reporting by governments and their agencies
represents a significant threat to financial
stability and economic growth9
. Indeed,
as the sovereign debt crisis has spread
across the globe and the parlous financial
state of a number of countries has become
evident, many are asking why the financial
statements of governments failed to reveal
the existence and extent of the problem.
In a recent letter to the G20 Deputies and
Finance Ministers, IFAC identified the benefits
of improved public sector financial reporting
and also put them in a global context:
‘The use of IPSASs by governments
worldwide will improve the quality
of financial information reported by
public entities, which is critical for
investors, taxpayers, and the general
public to understand the full impact of
decisions made by governments with
respect to their financial performance,
financial position, and cash flows.
Global adoption of these standards
will facilitate the comparability of such
information on a global basis and assist
in internal management decisions in
resource allocation (planning and
budgeting), monitoring, accountability,
and long-term sustainability. As a
universal set of public sector accounting
standards, IPSASs would also provide
better information regarding systemic
What is the vision?
9. International Monetary Fund, ibid.
10. International Federation of Accountants,
Letter from Ian Ball Chief Executive Officer
to The Group of Twenty Deputies and
Finance Ministers, April 6, 2012.
11. See Report from the Commission to the
Council and the European Parliament,
Op. Cit, paragraph 3.
FOOTNOTESrisks associated with government
liabilities, and would represent a
significant step forward in achieving
the financial transparency of national
governments worldwide.’10
IFAC’s views about the benefits of improved
public sector financial reporting were
recently mirrored by the EU in its report to
the Council of the European Union and the
European Parliament:
‘Harmonised accruals-based
government accounting improves
transparency, accountability and the
comparability of financial reporting
in the public sector, and may serve
to improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of public audit...
...Harmonised standards for public
sector accounting would enhance
transparency, comparability and
cost efficiency, and provide the basis
for improved governance in the
public sector...
...Governments have a public interest
obligation to market participants –
owners of government debt securities
and potential investors – to provide
timely, reliable and comparable
information on their financial
performance and position, in the
same way that listed companies
have obligations to equity market
participants. Also, there is a need
to ensure a minimum level of
international comparability, especially
as government securities compete
against each other in a global financial
market, which calls for a system based
on general public-sector standards
accepted worldwide.’11
The benefits identified by IFAC and the EU
apply across all levels of government; from
national or federal; to state or provincial; and,
to local government, and to all spheres of
government activity, including government
business enterprises. Accounting standards
that are focussed on meeting the needs
9. Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia 9
of the users of the financial statements
of public sector entities (i.e. taxpayers,
elected representatives, investors and the
general public) will enhance the quality of
information provided to those users and
thereby facilitate both improved decision
making about the allocation of scarce public
sector resources and assessments of the
accountability. The existing constraints
on the IPSASB’s ability to achieve these
outcomes need to be removed.
In addition to the benefits that will flow from
having a more empowered IPSASB that is
able to bring about needed improvements in
the quality of public sector financial reporting
across the globe, there are likely to be
synergistic benefits in having this dual-sector
financial reporting globalisation occur on a
comparable basis. In other words, significant
benefits are likely to be gained from having
reporting entities in the public and private
sectors prepare high-quality, transparent
financial statements that are comparable
both within their respective sectors and
across the sectors. This should facilitate
cross-sector capital flows nationally and
both cross-sector and cross-border capital
flows internationally.
The global financial crisis, the sovereign
debt crisis and the growing importance of
sovereign wealth and similar funds have
underscored the need for financial reporting
comparability across sectors.
At the margin, the division between the
public and private sectors has always
been difficult to discern. This has been
acknowledged by national and international
standard setters who have in the past
required or encouraged for-profit public
sector entities to apply private sector
accounting standards12
. This division has
been blurred even more by the global
financial crisis which resulted in many
governments and their agencies being
forced to acquire direct ownership stakes
in private sector entities, many of them
major international commercial enterprises.
Some major private sector companies are
now controlled by governments, in some
cases with ongoing private sector investors.
Users of the financial statements of these
entities (including governments) expect to
be provided with high-quality, transparent
financial information. They would find it
anomalous if they were deprived of this
because a change in ownership dictated
a financial reporting regime that was unable
to deliver the information that they required.
It is often overlooked that governments
and their agencies are major participants
in the world’s capital markets through their
debt raisings. The sovereign debt crisis has
brought this to the world’s attention and
has highlighted the need for governments
to provide high-quality, transparent financial
information to government bond holders.
With the credit ratings of sovereign states
coming under increasing scrutiny, investors
are demanding more transparent information
about countries’ financial health. In a recent
interview, the CEO of IFAC stated:
‘It is in investors’ own interest to push
for more transparent public accounts,
commonandmorethoroughaccounting
standards, and audits as strict as those
corporates face ...’
‘AswediscoveredinthecaseofGreece,
the question of how reliable the
accountingis,wascalledintoquestion.
If governments were accounting as
companies do, we would be in a
somewhat better position to assess
whether the numbers were reliable.’13
Investors value comparable information
highly. High-quality, comparable financial
information will facilitate governments’
capital raisings by enabling investors to
better price their debt issues.
With the growth in the use of sovereign
wealth and similar funds, governments
are increasingly becoming stakeholders in
vehicles similar in nature to private sector
managed investment funds, and through
these funds they are becoming major
investors in private sector entities. Just as
governments would expect their funds to
be provided with high-quality, transparent
financial information about the funds’ private
sector direct investments and potential
investments, so too would government
stakeholders (taxpayers, investors and the
general public) expect to be provided with
high-quality, transparent financial information
about the performance and financial position
of the funds.
12. author’s COMMENT: Indeed, the
IPSASB currently requires government
business enterprises to apply IFRSs in
the preparation of their financial reports.
13. Ian Ball, Uniformity needed for country
balance sheet reporting, says global
accountancy body, interview for
Investment Europe, 19 March 2012.
FOOTNOTES
10. It’s time...for global, high quality public sector financial reporting10
For the vision to be achieved, we believe
two separate yet related developments
need to occur: the IPSASB needs to be
transformed and the private and public
sector financial reporting models need
to be integrated.
Transforming the IPSASB
Like the IASC before it, the IPSASB needs
to be restructured and adequately resourced
in order to successfully pursue its mission
of establishing a set of high quality global
accounting standards that can be applied
by public sector reporting entities around
the world. This transformation will enhance
confidence in the IPSASB’s governance
processes and the quality of its standards.
In so doing it will present a more compelling
case for national jurisdictions considering
embracing IPSASs as part of their legislative
frameworks14
.
One of the aims of the restructuring should
be to create an environment in which the
IPSASB can act, and can be perceived to
be acting, independently of its constituents.
The importance of independence in standard
setting was recently succinctly articulated by
the accounting and reporting subcommittee
of the International Organisation of Supreme
Audit Institutions (INTOSAI):
‘A successful standard-setting process
produces high-quality standards that
yield relevant, reliable, neutral,
consistent, and comparable financial
statements that meet the needs of
users. To achieve this goal, the
standard-setting process must be
rigorous, transparent, objective, and
participatory, but most importantly, it
must be carried out by an independent
standard-setting body. If those who
set the standards are not independent
from those who prepare the financial
statements, the standards could
be arbitrarily changed to suit the
preferences of the current management
and could result in inconsistent or
misleading financial statements.’15
How should the vision be achieved?
14. author’s COMMENT: The IPSASB’s
current structure and level of resourcing
were identified by the EU as reasons
why IPSASs are not at the present time
suitable for adoption by EU Member
States. The EU Report stated:
‘At present, the governance of IPSAS
suffers from insufficient participation
from EU public-sector accounting
authorities. During 2012, the governance
framework of IPSAS was being
reviewed to address issues of concern to
stakeholders. Any reform should ensure
that the independence of the standard-
setting process is strengthened,
while public-sector-specific needs are
effectively addressed. In addition, the
IPSAS Board currently seems to have
insufficient resources to ensure that it
can meet with the necessary speed and
flexibility the demand for new standards
and guidance on emerging issues in the
evolving fiscal climate, particularly in
the wake of the crisis.’ See EU Report to
the Council and European Parliament,
Op. cit, paragraph 4. The need for the
IPSASB to be restructured in order to
sustain its momentum and ensure its
long-term viability was also recently
proposed by a senior member of the
Organisation for Economic Cooperation
and Development. See presentation
by Jon Ragner Blöndal, Head,
Budgetary and Public Expenditures,
Organisation for Economic Cooperation
and Development, 12th Annual OECD
Accruals Symposium, Paris, 9 March
2012, accessible at www.oecd.org/gov/
budgeting/49849808.pdf.
15. International Organisation of Supreme
Audit Institutions, The importance of an
independent standard-setting process,
INTOSAI Subcommittee on Accounting
and Reporting, 2010. The paper was
endorsed by the XX International
Congress of Supreme Audit Institutions
(INCOSAI) in November 2010.
FOOTNOTESThe concern is not so much whether
members of the IPSASB act independently
in their decision making; it is with the
perception of independence. Stated
differently, while there is no evidence of
actual conflict or bias, the existing structure
may create the perception that they do exist.
While the changes recommended in 2004,
in particular placing the Board within the
scope of the Public Interest Oversight Board
of IFAC and appointing public members to
the IPSASB, would go some of the way to
addressing the perception issue, further
changes are needed. The IPSASB remains
a standing committee of IFAC and may be
seen as being under the direct influence of
the IFAC Council in the first instance and
more broadly the worldwide accounting
profession. Like the IASB, it needs to be
positioned in a way that clearly separates
it from its constituents. Similarly, the
appointment of public members to the
IPSASB would not remove the concern
that Board members who are not full-time
standard setters may be constrained in their
actions by loyalty to their employers. This
was a concern expressed about the IASC
and led to the appointment of 12 of the
14 members of the inaugural IASB on a
full-time basis. The IPSASB needs to follow
a similar course.
Another aim of the restructuring should
be to establish appropriate governance
arrangements relating to the creation of
a formal relationship with national public
sector financial reporting regulators, the
appointment of IPSASB members and
members of related committees, and
oversight of the Board’s due process.
These are matters that have recently been
the focus of attention of the IFRS Foundation
Trustees in the context of the operations
of the IASB and the IFRS Foundation
Trustees. A number of amendments to the
original governance arrangements have
been introduced in response to concerns
expressed by the IASB’s constituents.
We believe the enhanced arrangements
are equally relevant for the IPSASB.
As noted earlier, the IPSASB has a small
professional staff and relies heavily on
contributions from its Board members
and their supporting staff, as did the IASC.
11. Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia 11
This limited resource base has severely
hampered the IPSASB in keeping its
standards up to date with IFRSs and in
pursuing relevant public sector specific
projects. Although a recent modest
increase in funding has improved the
situation, the current level of funding is
clearly inadequate. Not only do significantly
more resources need to be devoted to
standards development, significantly more
resources are also needed for engaging
with constituents throughout the standards
development process and for facilitating the
use of IPSASs around the world. The IASB
has a large, full-time professional staff and
devotes considerable resources to its due
process and to liaison with its constituents.
Integrating the reporting
models
Integrating the private and public sector
financial reporting models to enable the
preparation of high-quality, comparable
financial statements by reporting entities
irrespective of whether they operate in
the private or public sector requires the
establishment of transaction-neutral
accounting standards. As noted earlier,
transaction-neutral accounting standards are
formulated with the objective of accounting
for like transactions in like ways and unlike
transactions in different ways. Thus, whether
an entity that holds a debt instrument as an
investment is a bank in the private sector or
a sovereign wealth fund in the public sector,
they would account for the investment in
the same way. Similarly, whether an entity
that has incurred a defined benefit pension
obligation is a private sector mining company
or a state or federal government, they would
account for the liability in the same way16
.
Some have interpreted transaction-neutral
accounting standards as meaning that
identical standards would apply to entities in
both sectors or that private sector standards
should apply to public sector entities.
This is a misunderstanding of the notion
of transaction-neutral standards.
Transaction-neutral standards should reflect
the nature of the transactions and other
events affecting the entity in question. For
example, a for-profit entity (whether in the
private or public sector) acquires and uses
assets to generate profits for stakeholders.
Accounting standards addressing the
potential impairment of these assets should
focus on the recoverability of the assets’
carrying amounts by reference to future
cash flows expected to be generated by
them. A not-for-profit entity (whether in the
private or public sector) acquires and uses
assets to provide needed goods and services
in accordance with its service delivery
objective, not to directly generate future cash
flows. Accounting standards addressing the
potential impairment of these assets should
focus on whether the assets will continue
to provide the service potential required
to deliver the needed goods or services,
not on whether the carrying amounts are
recoverable from future cash flows. The
impairment standards should be the same
for for-profit entities in either sector but
different from the impairment standards
for not-for-profit entities in either sector17
.
Similarly, accounting standards dealing
with reporting performance should focus
on the different nature of for-profit and
not-for-profit entities. For example, an
accounting standard dealing with reporting
performance by for-profit entities arguably
should focus on profit-generating activities
with particular emphasis on profit and
comprehensive income. An accounting
standard dealing with reporting performance
by not-for-profit entities arguably should
focus on service delivery activities with
particular emphasis on the cost of service
delivery, and perhaps should place greater
emphasis on non-financial performance
indicators than a similar standard dealing
with for-profit entities.
Transaction-neutral
conceptual framework
The key to developing transaction-
neutral accounting standards is to base
those standards on a transaction-neutral
conceptual framework. Such a framework
would identify the basic concepts for the
preparation of general purpose financial
statements applicable to reporting entities
irrespective of the nature of the entity or the
sector in which it operates. The framework
would be written in language that would
reflect both private and public sector
perspectives. For example, the objective of
general purpose financial reporting could
be expressed in terms broad enough to
16. author’s COMMENT: In the same
sense, if a reporting entity, whether it be
a government agency, a private sector
charity or a publicly listed company,
receives resources from external parties
that are different in nature, then those
transactions should be accounted for
differently. For example, if the resource
transfer is a loan to the entity it should
be accounted for differently from a
resource transfer that is a contribution
by an owner or a charitable donation.
17. author’s COMMENT: Of course, the
impairment standards for for-profit and
not-for-profit entities may be different
for different types of assets held by
those entities.
FOOTNOTES
12. It’s time...for global, high quality public sector financial reporting12
encompass all reporting entities, such as
to provide information to users to assist
them in making economic decisions and in
assessing accountability. The narrative would
then provide more detail about the types
of information that users of the financial
statements of the different entities would
require for meeting the broad objective.
As a further example, while the basic
characteristics of the elements of the
financial statements, e.g. assets, liabilities,
income, expenses, equity, contributions by
owners, distributions to owners, etc., should
be the same for all entities since these
elements are descriptions of real world
economic phenomena, the explanations of
those characteristics would as appropriate
highlight the different entity perspectives.
The element ‘assets’ would, for example,
be described as having a number of
characteristics including that it is a ‘resource’.
The narrative accompanying the discussion
of asset characteristics would then explain
that in the case of for-profit entities,
‘resource’ refers to the capacity to generate
future cash inflows, and, in the case of not-
for-profit entities, ‘resource’ refers to service
potential, i.e. the capacity to provide goods
and services in the future.
As noted previously, Australia and New
Zealand have developed transaction-neutral
conceptual frameworks with respect to
private and public sector entities. The US
Financial Accounting Standards Board has
developed a transaction neutral-conceptual
framework for private sector for-profit and
not-for-profit entities. Accordingly, a good
deal of the intellectual development has
already been undertaken. However, neither
the IASB nor the IPSASB has developed
a transaction-neutral conceptual framework.
The IASB inherited the IASC’s for-profit
private sector conceptual framework and
has recently been revising the framework.
However, to date the for-profit perspective
has been retained18
. The IPSASB is in
the process of developing a conceptual
framework for public sector reporting
entities. The time is right to coordinate these
efforts with the objective of producing a
transaction-neutral conceptual framework.
Failure to do so would create a risk that
either or both Boards could entrench
fundamental concepts that are incompatible
with that objective and lead to the
development of accounting standards that
are not transaction neutral19
. This risk was
recently acknowledged by the New Zealand
Accounting Standards Board, which noted
‘...because the IPSASB and the IASB prepare
financial statements (sic) for specific sectors,
there is a risk that the two boards will
develop separate standards that treat
like transactions in similar circumstances
in quite different ways’20
.
18. author’s COMMENT: Although the
IASB originally planned to encompass
private sector not-for-profit entities in
its conceptual framework project, it
recently announced its intention to limit
the scope of the project to for-profit
entities. This tentative decision has
been met with criticism from some of its
constituents, including the Australian
Accounting Standards Board.
19. author’s COMMENT: The possibility
of this happening is illustrated by a
proposal of the IPSASB to identify two
additional elements of the financial
statements, ‘deferred inflows’ and
‘deferred outflows’, in its recent
conceptual framework exposure draft.
If this decision was to be confirmed by
the IPSASB after public exposure of
the proposals, the IPSASB’s conceptual
framework would be fundamentally
different from those that have been
developed by private sector standard
setters over a considerable period of
time, including the IASC and the FASB.
See IPSASB. November 2012. Conceptual
Framework Exposure Draft 2 – Conceptual
Framework for General Purpose Financial
Reporting by Public Sector Entities:
Elements and Recognition in Financial
Statements, Section 5.
20. External Reporting Board – NZ
Accounting Standards Board. September
2012. Exposure Draft 2012-4 Framework:
PBE Standards – Mixed Groups,
Explanatory Guide AX: NZASB Strategy
to Respond to Emerging Differences
Between PBE Standards and NZ IFRSs
(EG AX), paragraph 5.
FOOTNOTES
13. Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia 13
The vision of high quality, transaction
neutral, global financial reporting
standards that are applied by reporting
entities in the private and public sectors
around the world could potentially be
achieved in a number of different ways.
For example, a new international public
sector standard setting body could
be established with the features and
operating mandate identified above.
Alternatively, an existing global standard
setting structure could be modified to
encompass the changes we believe
are necessary21
.
The establishment of a new international
public sector standard setter might logically
be pursued by national jurisdictions
entering into a multi-lateral arrangement,
perhaps through the auspices of an
existing intergovernmental body such as
the United Nations, the World Bank or the
International Monetary Fund. This would
have the advantage of achieving ‘buy-in’
from countries at the outset, which should
facilitate adoption of the standards. It should
also ensure that the body is adequately
resourced; something standard setting
bodies have historically struggled to achieve.
However, the difficulties and disadvantages
of pursuing this approach are many.
For example, it would be very difficult
to achieve agreement amongst diverse
countries to the establishment, structure
and operating mandate of such a body22
.
It would also be very difficult to achieve
‘buy-in’ up front from countries because
this would effectively require them to
commit to adopting the body’s standards23
.
There are two principal disadvantages of
pursuing this course of action: the time it
would take to establish a new body and
the perceived independence of the body.
Earlier in this paper we observed that
events have conspired to create the ideal
environment for convincing countries to
support the development of global public
sector accounting standards. The world
cannot afford to let this opportunity slip
by trying to ‘reinvent the wheel’; now is
the time for action.
We also observed earlier in the paper
that independence is the cornerstone of
an accounting standard setting structure.
A standard setting body charged with
developing public sector accounting
standards that was established by
governments, is funded by governments
and, presumably, is overseen by
governments would not engender the
very necessary perception that the body
is independent24
.
We believe the most efficient and effective
course of action to pursue is to build on an
existing global standard setting structure,
i.e. the IPSASB of the IFAC or the IFRS
Foundation. Changes that would need to
be made to either of these standard setting
arrangements could be made much more
quickly than establishing a completely new
arrangement. In addition, the independence
concerns with an inter-governmental
body would be avoided because both the
IPSASB and the IFRS Foundation reside
within the private sector. Although funding
would be more challenging than under
an inter-governmental arrangement, the
IFRS Foundation has demonstrated that a
viable funding model can be established.
Convincing countries to adopt the standards
will prove to be challenging irrespective
of the model. As has been the case with
the IASB, the global public sector standard
setter will have to rely on the quality of
its standards and the influence of external
forces to induce countries to adopt its
standards.
Building on either the IFAC’s or IFRS
Foundation’s standard setting arrangements
could achieve the vision of high quality,
transaction neutral, global financial reporting
standards. However, we believe the IFRS
Foundation course of action, which would
involve bringing the IPSASB into the IFRS
Foundation, would be a more efficient
strategy and would be more likely to be
successful in achieving the vision.
Charting a course to achieve the vision
21. author’s COMMENT: Some might
consider that another viable alternative
is to use the standards of a national or
regional standard setting body. That
standard setting body would a de facto
global standard setter in much the same
way that the United States’ Financial
Accounting Standard Board (FASB) was
a de facto global standard setter for the
private sector before the establishment
of the IASB. We do not agree with this
view. We do not believe countries will
be prepared to embrace public sector
standards developed by a national or
regional standard setter. The experience
of the private sector supports this view.
Although a few countries based their
local standards on FASB standards
and some allowed their multi-national
companies to use FASB standards, the
vast majority of countries continued to
develop and use their own standards.
The advent of the IASB saw a major
change in countries’ preparedness
to forgo their own standard setting
activities and effectively adopt those of
another (international) body. The private
sector experience is not surprising.
Countries understandably displayed an
unwillingness to use the standards of a
body that is populated by members from
a single country, develops standards in
consultation only with people from that
country, addresses issues that are of
concern to that country and resolves
those issues in the context of that
country’s particular circumstances.
We have no reason to expect countries
to have a different response to the use
of the public sector standards issued
by a national or regional public sector
standard setter.
22. author’s COMMENT: Indeed, some
have suggested that were such a body to
be established it would likely resemble
a ‘united nations of standard setters’
with the capacity for lively debate but
a propensity to achieve very little.
23. While many countries have either
adopted IFRSs or permitted their use,
they have done so almost without
exception by subjecting the standards
to a local ‘endorsement’ mechanism.
24. author’s COMMENT: The following
observation by the accounting and
reporting subcommittee of INTOSAI,
noted earlier in the paper, is apposite:
‘if those who set the standards are not
independent from those who prepare
the financial statements, the standards
could be arbitrarily changed to suit the
preferences of the current management
and could result in inconsistent or
misleading financial statements.’
International Organisation of Supreme
Audit Institutions, Ibid.
FOOTNOTES
14. It’s time...for global, high quality public sector financial reporting14
In the first place, the basic architecture is
already in place. The critical design features
discussed earlier in this paper that are
missing from the existing IPSASB structure
were carefully crafted in creating the IFRS
Foundation, and have been further refined
during the 12 years since the organisation
was established. In particular, requirements
and processes designed to safeguard
the independence of IASB members are
in place and, we believe, have proven to
be effective in creating the perception of
independent decision making by IASB
members. In addition, well developed
oversight processes and procedures exist
and the overall governance arrangements
have been developed to the point where the
organisation has, arguably, obtained political
legitimacy. Also, the IFRS Foundation has
been putting in place a sustainable funding
model that could be readily adapted to
include public sector constituents.
Secondly, achieving an essential element
of the vision; transaction-neutral standards,
is much more likely if the two boards are
working together in the same organisation.
The architecture of the standard setting
organisation provides the framework within
which high quality accounting standards
can be developed. However, developing
transaction-neutral standards will require a
commitment by the IPSASB and the IASB to
that goal, and ongoing co-operation between
them to bring it about. Even with the best
of intentions and goodwill between the
boards and their governing bodies, having
them operate in separate organisations will
inevitably see them drift apart. Even now we
see that notwithstanding the Memorandum
of Understanding that was recently entered
into by the IPSASB and the IASB there is
clear evidence (noted earlier in this paper)
that the boards are increasingly going their
own separate ways.
To implement our preferred course of action,
we believe the following changes to the
IFRS Foundation and the IPSASB would
be necessary:
• The IFRS Foundation’s Constitution
would need to be amended to include the
development of accounting standards for
public sector entities, and the missions
of the IASB and IPSASB would need to
include the development
of transaction-neutral standards
• The IFRS Foundation Monitoring Board
would need to include members from
the public sector with responsibility
at a national level for the regulation of
public sector financial reporting. Ideally,
members from the public and private
sectors should be equal
• The IFRS Foundation Trustees would
need to include members from the
public sector. Ideally, members from
the public and private sectors should
be equal in number
• The IPSASB would need to be
repopulated with a smaller number
of full-time members25
• The IFRS Foundation’s funding
model would need to be enlarged
to include contributions from public
sector constituents.
25. author’s COMMENT: After
the transition to the modified IFRS
Foundation has occurred and the two
boards have been successfully pursuing
their mandates, consideration could be
given to merging the boards.
FOOTNOTES
15. Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia 15
The calls for fundamental reforms to
public sector financial reporting are
growing louder and becoming more
widespread as the level of awareness of
the potential benefits of such reforms
nationally and globally increases. But will
the G20, the EU, the World Bank, the IMF,
IFAC, the IFRS Foundation and others rise
to the challenge?
We sincerely hope the answer is yes
because now is the time to seize the
moment and pursue a change in the
world’s financial reporting landscape that
will have lasting benefits. This opportunity
may not re-emerge for some time, if ever!
Are we up to the challenge?
16. Contact details
Customer Service Centre – 1300 137 322
South Australia/Northern Territory
Westpac Building
Level 29, 91 King William Street
Adelaide SA 5000
GPO Box 9985 Adelaide SA 5001
Phone 08 8113 5500
FAX 08 8231 1982
Victoria/Tasmania
Level 3, 600 Bourke Street
Melbourne Vic 3000
GPO Box 9985 Melbourne Vic 3001
Phone 03 9641 7400
FAX 03 9670 3143
Western Australia
Level 11, 2 Mill Street
Perth WA 6000
GPO Box 9985 Perth WA 6848
Phone 08 9420 0400
FAX 08 9321 5141
National office/New South Wales
33 Erskine Street
Sydney NSW 2000
GPO Box 9985 Sydney NSW 2001
Phone 02 9290 1344
FAX 02 9262 1512
Australian Capital Territory
Level 10, 60 Marcus Clarke Street
Canberra ACT 2601
GPO Box 9985 Canberra ACT 2601
Phone 02 6122 6100
FAX 02 6122 6122
Queensland
Level 32, Central Plaza One
345 Queen Street Brisbane Qld 4000
GPO Box 9985 Brisbane Qld 4001
Phone 07 3233 6500
FAX 07 3233 6555
charteredaccountants.com.au