The document discusses a case between Borden Inc. and Sons of Thunder (SOT). Borden and SOT had a 5-year contract for Borden to purchase clams from SOT. Borden cancelled the contract after 90 days notice as allowed, but SOT alleged this was in bad faith. The document discusses precedent from a 1917 case and terms like good faith, consideration, and commercial reasonableness. It concludes Borden did not act honestly or reasonably in cancelling the contract.
Nanowski was responsible for the day-to-day operations of a company and some employees were not paid wages and quit. Nanowski was convicted of failure to pay wages under state labor law. Nanowski argued he did not have criminal intent, but a previous precedent case established that failure to pay wages is a strict liability crime that does not require intent. Based on this, Nanowski should be convicted as he failed to pay wages on time as required by law.
các Slide môn Law thuộc chương trình tiên tiến K49, NEU. Nhóm 13 gồm có các thành viên: Phạm Duy Thanh, Đặng Phương Tâm, Nguyễn Tiến Thịnh, Nguyễn Văn Sơn. Giảng viên : Trần Văn Nam.
1. The parties had an implied contract based on their course of dealings and industry custom, even though there was no written agreement.
2. Varni sued Wine World for breach of contract when Wine World terminated the distribution agreement without cause, claiming the implied contract protected them from termination without cause.
3. The court found that industry custom can supply terms to an implied contract, and ruled in favor of Varni.
The document summarizes a case involving the proposed sale of shares between Dunk and Shann. On November 24th, Dunk proposed terms to sell Shann shares, which Shann's attorney agreed to. This agreement was intended to be formalized in a final contract. However, a dispute later arose where each party proposed different terms than the November 24th agreement. The document discusses whether the November 24th agreement constituted a binding contract or was still under negotiation. It also references a precedent case between TIA and Tribune where a commitment letter was found to be a binding agreement. Based on similarities to the precedent case but also differences in how the parties acted, the conclusion is that while the November 24th agreement was a contract, neither Dunk
Jason Heckel was sued by the state of Washington for sending spam emails that contained misleading subject lines and false transmission paths, in violation of Washington state law. Heckel argued the law violated the Commerce Clause. The court found that the law did not discriminate against interstate commerce or unduly burden it, since it applied evenly to both in-state and out-of-state spammers and aimed to prohibit deception rather than banning spam entirely. The court upheld the state law.
The document discusses a case between Borden Inc. and Sons of Thunder (SOT). Borden and SOT had a 5-year contract for Borden to purchase clams from SOT. Borden cancelled the contract after 90 days notice as allowed, but SOT alleged this was in bad faith. The document discusses precedent from a 1917 case and terms like good faith, consideration, and commercial reasonableness. It concludes Borden did not act honestly or reasonably in cancelling the contract.
Nanowski was responsible for the day-to-day operations of a company and some employees were not paid wages and quit. Nanowski was convicted of failure to pay wages under state labor law. Nanowski argued he did not have criminal intent, but a previous precedent case established that failure to pay wages is a strict liability crime that does not require intent. Based on this, Nanowski should be convicted as he failed to pay wages on time as required by law.
các Slide môn Law thuộc chương trình tiên tiến K49, NEU. Nhóm 13 gồm có các thành viên: Phạm Duy Thanh, Đặng Phương Tâm, Nguyễn Tiến Thịnh, Nguyễn Văn Sơn. Giảng viên : Trần Văn Nam.
1. The parties had an implied contract based on their course of dealings and industry custom, even though there was no written agreement.
2. Varni sued Wine World for breach of contract when Wine World terminated the distribution agreement without cause, claiming the implied contract protected them from termination without cause.
3. The court found that industry custom can supply terms to an implied contract, and ruled in favor of Varni.
The document summarizes a case involving the proposed sale of shares between Dunk and Shann. On November 24th, Dunk proposed terms to sell Shann shares, which Shann's attorney agreed to. This agreement was intended to be formalized in a final contract. However, a dispute later arose where each party proposed different terms than the November 24th agreement. The document discusses whether the November 24th agreement constituted a binding contract or was still under negotiation. It also references a precedent case between TIA and Tribune where a commitment letter was found to be a binding agreement. Based on similarities to the precedent case but also differences in how the parties acted, the conclusion is that while the November 24th agreement was a contract, neither Dunk
Jason Heckel was sued by the state of Washington for sending spam emails that contained misleading subject lines and false transmission paths, in violation of Washington state law. Heckel argued the law violated the Commerce Clause. The court found that the law did not discriminate against interstate commerce or unduly burden it, since it applied evenly to both in-state and out-of-state spammers and aimed to prohibit deception rather than banning spam entirely. The court upheld the state law.
The plaintiff, a resident of Michigan, is suing a restaurant located in California for injuries sustained when a light fixture fell and cut the plaintiff's arm while visiting the restaurant in California. The lawsuit seeks over $1 million in damages for medical expenses, lost wages, permanent damage, and pain and suffering. The document discusses jurisdiction and where the lawsuit could potentially be heard, including the federal court in San Francisco or Cincinnati, or the California superior court, as the incident occurred in California where the defendant is located.
1. JOL sued Adell for damages arising from defective resin chips purchased from Adell that were less durable and attractive than previous batches. Adell argued damages were limited to the purchase price per the contract terms.
2. Under the UCC implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, JOL could sue for damages beyond the purchase price since the resin was defective and not fit for JOL's purpose of making gaming chips.
3. A US precedent supported that implied warranties allow claims for economic losses beyond a product's limited warranty terms.
4. A similar Vietnam case found in favor of the plaintiff chemical company being compensated for damages from defective bags purchased that did not meet the implied
Goff sued Obstetricians & Gynecologists, P.C. (O&G) for promissory estoppel after accepting a job offer from them and resigning from her previous position, only to be told by O&G not to report to work. While O&G argued the promise was unenforceable due to lack of consideration, the elements of promissory estoppel were met since O&G should have known their offer would induce reliance, Goff significantly relied on the offer by resigning her previous job, and injustice would occur if the promise was not enforced. Based on precedent, the court found in favor of Goff, applying promissory estoppel due to her lost
This document discusses a case involving quasi contracts and unjust enrichment. It analyzes a case where a telecommunications company (VAC) filed for bankruptcy but had sent payment checks to a services provider (DOCS) both before and after filing. The trustee sought to recover the post-filing payments under a theory of quasi contract. It also examines a precedent case where a company was found to have been unjustly enriched and required to pay under quantum meruit. Finally, it discusses the implications for a Vietnam case where a man received a large sum of money due to a bank error.
Bạn muốn biết nhiều hơn về chứng khoán ?
Bạn muốn trở thành nhà đầu tư đầy sáng tạo và thành công trong tương lai ?
Hãy đến với FIC - FUTURE INVESTORS CULB
... Câu lạc bộ của niềm đam mê học hỏi chứng khoán, đầu tư và hơn thế nữa....
....nơi bạn có thể học hỏi kinh nghiệm từ những chuyên gia, doanh nhân thành đạt...
....nơi bạn có thể giao lưu và thử sức với nhiều trải nghiệm mới lạ......
Chúng tôi hân hạnh giới thiệu: Talk Show đầu tiên được tổ chức bởi Câu lạc Bộ chứng khoán FIC mang tên:
"Sinh Viên và Chứng Khoán"
Chương trình vinh dự có sự góp mặt của:
- CEO đến từ công ty Stock Plus
- Cô Huệ - giảng viên khoa tài chính-ngân hàng trường kinh tế,
- Phó giám đốc phụ trách phân tích công ty chứng khoán Hà Nội
Presentation For Vietnamese Vedan Companythanhphamduy
Vedan, a Vietnamese food company, was fined over $300,000 for repeatedly discharging untreated wastewater over the legal limits into the Thi Vai River from 2008, polluting the local environment. An investigation found 10 failures by Vedan to properly treat wastewater and comply with environmental regulations, including discharging wastewater 10 times higher than permitted levels from various plants. The ministry sanctioned Vedan and required them to pay additional environmental protection fees.
Smartbiz_He thong MES nganh may mac_2024juneSmartBiz
Cách Hệ thống MES giúp tối ưu Quản lý Sản xuất trong ngành May mặc như thế nào?
Ngành may mặc, với đặc thù luôn thay đổi theo xu hướng thị trường và đòi hỏi cao về chất lượng, đang ngày càng cần những giải pháp công nghệ tiên tiến để duy trì sự cạnh tranh. Bạn đã bao giờ tự hỏi làm thế nào mà những thương hiệu hàng đầu có thể sản xuất hàng triệu sản phẩm với độ chính xác gần như tuyệt đối và thời gian giao hàng nhanh chóng? Bí mật nằm ở hệ thống Quản lý Sản xuất (MES - Manufacturing Execution System).
Hãy cùng khám phá cách hệ thống MES đang cách mạng hóa ngành may mặc và mang lại những lợi ích vượt trội như thế nào.
The plaintiff, a resident of Michigan, is suing a restaurant located in California for injuries sustained when a light fixture fell and cut the plaintiff's arm while visiting the restaurant in California. The lawsuit seeks over $1 million in damages for medical expenses, lost wages, permanent damage, and pain and suffering. The document discusses jurisdiction and where the lawsuit could potentially be heard, including the federal court in San Francisco or Cincinnati, or the California superior court, as the incident occurred in California where the defendant is located.
1. JOL sued Adell for damages arising from defective resin chips purchased from Adell that were less durable and attractive than previous batches. Adell argued damages were limited to the purchase price per the contract terms.
2. Under the UCC implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, JOL could sue for damages beyond the purchase price since the resin was defective and not fit for JOL's purpose of making gaming chips.
3. A US precedent supported that implied warranties allow claims for economic losses beyond a product's limited warranty terms.
4. A similar Vietnam case found in favor of the plaintiff chemical company being compensated for damages from defective bags purchased that did not meet the implied
Goff sued Obstetricians & Gynecologists, P.C. (O&G) for promissory estoppel after accepting a job offer from them and resigning from her previous position, only to be told by O&G not to report to work. While O&G argued the promise was unenforceable due to lack of consideration, the elements of promissory estoppel were met since O&G should have known their offer would induce reliance, Goff significantly relied on the offer by resigning her previous job, and injustice would occur if the promise was not enforced. Based on precedent, the court found in favor of Goff, applying promissory estoppel due to her lost
This document discusses a case involving quasi contracts and unjust enrichment. It analyzes a case where a telecommunications company (VAC) filed for bankruptcy but had sent payment checks to a services provider (DOCS) both before and after filing. The trustee sought to recover the post-filing payments under a theory of quasi contract. It also examines a precedent case where a company was found to have been unjustly enriched and required to pay under quantum meruit. Finally, it discusses the implications for a Vietnam case where a man received a large sum of money due to a bank error.
Bạn muốn biết nhiều hơn về chứng khoán ?
Bạn muốn trở thành nhà đầu tư đầy sáng tạo và thành công trong tương lai ?
Hãy đến với FIC - FUTURE INVESTORS CULB
... Câu lạc bộ của niềm đam mê học hỏi chứng khoán, đầu tư và hơn thế nữa....
....nơi bạn có thể học hỏi kinh nghiệm từ những chuyên gia, doanh nhân thành đạt...
....nơi bạn có thể giao lưu và thử sức với nhiều trải nghiệm mới lạ......
Chúng tôi hân hạnh giới thiệu: Talk Show đầu tiên được tổ chức bởi Câu lạc Bộ chứng khoán FIC mang tên:
"Sinh Viên và Chứng Khoán"
Chương trình vinh dự có sự góp mặt của:
- CEO đến từ công ty Stock Plus
- Cô Huệ - giảng viên khoa tài chính-ngân hàng trường kinh tế,
- Phó giám đốc phụ trách phân tích công ty chứng khoán Hà Nội
Presentation For Vietnamese Vedan Companythanhphamduy
Vedan, a Vietnamese food company, was fined over $300,000 for repeatedly discharging untreated wastewater over the legal limits into the Thi Vai River from 2008, polluting the local environment. An investigation found 10 failures by Vedan to properly treat wastewater and comply with environmental regulations, including discharging wastewater 10 times higher than permitted levels from various plants. The ministry sanctioned Vedan and required them to pay additional environmental protection fees.
Smartbiz_He thong MES nganh may mac_2024juneSmartBiz
Cách Hệ thống MES giúp tối ưu Quản lý Sản xuất trong ngành May mặc như thế nào?
Ngành may mặc, với đặc thù luôn thay đổi theo xu hướng thị trường và đòi hỏi cao về chất lượng, đang ngày càng cần những giải pháp công nghệ tiên tiến để duy trì sự cạnh tranh. Bạn đã bao giờ tự hỏi làm thế nào mà những thương hiệu hàng đầu có thể sản xuất hàng triệu sản phẩm với độ chính xác gần như tuyệt đối và thời gian giao hàng nhanh chóng? Bí mật nằm ở hệ thống Quản lý Sản xuất (MES - Manufacturing Execution System).
Hãy cùng khám phá cách hệ thống MES đang cách mạng hóa ngành may mặc và mang lại những lợi ích vượt trội như thế nào.
Tuyển tập 9 chuyên đề bồi dưỡng Toán lớp 5 cơ bản và nâng cao ôn thi vào lớp ...Bồi Dưỡng HSG Toán Lớp 3
Tuyển tập 9 chuyên đề bồi dưỡng Toán lớp 5 cơ bản và nâng cao ôn thi vào lớp 6 trường chuyên. Đăng ký mua tài liệu Toán 5 vui lòng liên hệ: 0948.228.325 (Zalo - Cô Trang Toán IQ).
4. Birmingham (2002-2005) Liverpool (2005-current) Salford-Manchester (2005-2006) California State University (2007 ) Visiting teaching& research fellow at Harvard University (2007-2008)
5. Thạc sĩ Trần Thị Phương Loan, Giám đốc GURUS Academy
6. Thạc sĩ Trần Thị Phương Loan, Giám đốc GURUS Academy GURUS ENGLISH GURUS FINANCE GURUS PROFESSIONAL
7. Ông ĐỖ VĂN HƯNG Phó Tổng giám đốc Ngân hàng Thương mại Cổ phần Quân đội
8. ÔNG ĐỖ VĂN HƯNG , P. TGD Ngân hàng TMCP Quân đội MB
9. ÔNG ĐỖ VĂN HƯNG , P. TGD Ngân hàng TMCP Quân đội MB