This document summarizes 11 previous judgments related to intellectual property law in India from 2021. Key cases included: 1) The Delhi High Court case on copyright of sound recordings and underlying works. 2) The Delhi High Court granting an anti-anti-suit injunction in a patent dispute. 3) The Delhi High Court case on post-mortem personality rights of actor Sushant Singh Rajput.
Intellectual property (IP) is a valuable asset for any company, and patent infringement can have a significant impact on the business. In India, patent infringement lawsuits are on the rise, and some of them have resulted in substantial settlements or verdicts. In this video, we will look at the 10 most famous Indian patent lawsuits.
If you need a patent licensing expert who not only understands the technology, industry, and your specific needs, but also stay with you on each step during monetization process and make sure you get the results crucial for your win, then you are at the right place. Our experts, at Boolean IP, have a total experience of conducting 100+ successful patent infringement identification searches. Clubbing the experience and expertise of our techno-legal experts, and AI-powered tools, Boolean IP provides high quality IP solutions that help you win. Get in touch with your queries.
#patentinfringements #patentlicenses #patentroyalty #infringements #patentrolls #infringers #patentmonetization #patentsearch #novelty #patentability #Freedomtooperate #FTO #booleanipconsulting
Intellectual property (IP) is a valuable asset for any company, and patent infringement can have a significant impact on the business. In India, patent infringement lawsuits are on the rise, and some of them have resulted in substantial settlements or verdicts. In this video, we will look at the 10 most famous Indian patent lawsuits.
If you need a patent licensing expert who not only understands the technology, industry, and your specific needs, but also stay with you on each step during monetization process and make sure you get the results crucial for your win, then you are at the right place. Our experts, at Boolean IP, have a total experience of conducting 100+ successful patent infringement identification searches. Clubbing the experience and expertise of our techno-legal experts, and AI-powered tools, Boolean IP provides high quality IP solutions that help you win. Get in touch with your queries.
#patentinfringements #patentlicenses #patentroyalty #infringements #patentrolls #infringers #patentmonetization #patentsearch #novelty #patentability #Freedomtooperate #FTO #booleanipconsulting
The Federal Circuit Review is a monthly newsletter featuring the latest case summaries handed down from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
In this Issue:
• Judgment of Infringement Entered as Sanction
• Patent Exhaustion Does Not Apply to Harvested Seeds
• Judges Disagree on § 101 Standards
• Litigation Is Not a Domestic Industry
Indian Intellectual Property Cases Report, 2021.pdfBananaIP Counsels
BananaIP is happy to launch the IP Cases Report for the year 2021. This report covers cases related to intellectual property decided by Courts in India, in the form of case notes. These case notes cover important decisions on critical questions of law and fact with respect to various species of intellectual property.
Lawweb.in whether dispute involving enforcement of intellectual property righ...Law Web
Not to put too fine a point on it, Mr. Dhond's argument misses a fundamental aspect of the Supreme Court's decision in V.H. Patel. What the Supreme Court had before it in that case was a reference to arbitration that related to three trade marks and injunction claims in relation to these. One of the arbitral declarations was that the three registered trade marks continued to be the assets of a particular firm. Others before the arbitrator were declared by arbitral award to have no right, title or interest in these marks. The arbitrator issued an injunction permanently restraining those others from using or explosing in the course of trade or otherwise any of those marks in any territory. No question was ever raised before the Supreme Court in V.H. Patel about the award on the issue of the trade marks being bad on account of nonarbitrability, nor did that issue give the Supreme Court pause. The only question of arbitrability was about the dissolution of the firm, and there, as we have seen, the Supreme Court found that reference to arbitration was indeed competent.
Knobbe Martens attorneys Jon Gurka and James Smith discuss recent district court rulings that have broadened the scope of IPR estoppel while they await the Supreme Court's decision in SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal.
Copyright defeats trademark rights – Two typical cases to better understand t...KENFOX IP & Law Office
First-to-file is not an absolute and immutable principle in establishing trademark rights. In a broader sense, it is not at default that when you are the first filer of the trademark, you will automatically be the trademark owner in perpetuity in Vietnam. A trademark registration certificate issued by the IP Office of Vietnam (IP VIETNAM) is not automatically a legal tool to protect you from allegations of intellectual property infringement. We provide two typical copyright-trademark conflict cases, one in China and one in Vietnam to demonstrate significance of copyright in winning trademark disputes. If not for earlier copyright, the legitimate owner would not be able to reclaim their trademarks.
https://induslaw.com
India has been making conscious efforts in building and growing its innovation framework which is evident from the fact that the Indian Government recently acquired 127 patents for 6G technology. The Courts have also been vigilant in protecting the rights of creators and brand owners to usher the wave of innovation and drive business growth. This is rightly evident from the Court’s coming of age ruling in the ‘Subway v. Suberb’ case, and the recent ‘Swiggy domain name dispute’. Simultaneously, the High Court of Delhi declaring the stylized logo of the French luxury brand, Hermes as awell-known trade mark also indicates the Courts sheer eagerness in recognising and safeguarding the transborder reputation enjoyed by notable international marks. This edition also tracks an interesting litigation centred around design infringement where the Court passed injunction in order to protect the registered keyboard design of the Japanese company, Casio. The judgement is likely to have a positive impact on the existing framework concerning Industrial Design in India. A few snippets of this edition that are worth reading include the underlying tussle between Zee Music and Spotify, Joan Mitchell Foundation issuing Cease and Desist to Louis Vuitton over use of paintings in handbag advertisements, and NFT and Metaverse related trade mark filings of Yves Saint Laurent and Amazon. So, without further ado, let’s dive into this edition!
This is a presentation of Intellectual property rights , how can we use them , what are its benefits and how the intellectual property is protected under these laws.
The project describes the Intellectual Property Acts and their violation by different companies. It covers many examples of IPR and their penalties on violation.
Patent Thickets: An Intertwining Web of Inventionskashishworld
In the words of Carl Shapiro, an American economist, a patent thicket is "a dense web of overlapping Intellectual Property Rights that a company must hack its way through to commercialize new technology."
Voiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box.pdfkashishworld
Voiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box office since they majorly influence the emotional sync between the audience and the visuals projected.
More Related Content
Similar to Previous judgments walking down the lane to 2021
The Federal Circuit Review is a monthly newsletter featuring the latest case summaries handed down from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
In this Issue:
• Judgment of Infringement Entered as Sanction
• Patent Exhaustion Does Not Apply to Harvested Seeds
• Judges Disagree on § 101 Standards
• Litigation Is Not a Domestic Industry
Indian Intellectual Property Cases Report, 2021.pdfBananaIP Counsels
BananaIP is happy to launch the IP Cases Report for the year 2021. This report covers cases related to intellectual property decided by Courts in India, in the form of case notes. These case notes cover important decisions on critical questions of law and fact with respect to various species of intellectual property.
Lawweb.in whether dispute involving enforcement of intellectual property righ...Law Web
Not to put too fine a point on it, Mr. Dhond's argument misses a fundamental aspect of the Supreme Court's decision in V.H. Patel. What the Supreme Court had before it in that case was a reference to arbitration that related to three trade marks and injunction claims in relation to these. One of the arbitral declarations was that the three registered trade marks continued to be the assets of a particular firm. Others before the arbitrator were declared by arbitral award to have no right, title or interest in these marks. The arbitrator issued an injunction permanently restraining those others from using or explosing in the course of trade or otherwise any of those marks in any territory. No question was ever raised before the Supreme Court in V.H. Patel about the award on the issue of the trade marks being bad on account of nonarbitrability, nor did that issue give the Supreme Court pause. The only question of arbitrability was about the dissolution of the firm, and there, as we have seen, the Supreme Court found that reference to arbitration was indeed competent.
Knobbe Martens attorneys Jon Gurka and James Smith discuss recent district court rulings that have broadened the scope of IPR estoppel while they await the Supreme Court's decision in SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal.
Copyright defeats trademark rights – Two typical cases to better understand t...KENFOX IP & Law Office
First-to-file is not an absolute and immutable principle in establishing trademark rights. In a broader sense, it is not at default that when you are the first filer of the trademark, you will automatically be the trademark owner in perpetuity in Vietnam. A trademark registration certificate issued by the IP Office of Vietnam (IP VIETNAM) is not automatically a legal tool to protect you from allegations of intellectual property infringement. We provide two typical copyright-trademark conflict cases, one in China and one in Vietnam to demonstrate significance of copyright in winning trademark disputes. If not for earlier copyright, the legitimate owner would not be able to reclaim their trademarks.
https://induslaw.com
India has been making conscious efforts in building and growing its innovation framework which is evident from the fact that the Indian Government recently acquired 127 patents for 6G technology. The Courts have also been vigilant in protecting the rights of creators and brand owners to usher the wave of innovation and drive business growth. This is rightly evident from the Court’s coming of age ruling in the ‘Subway v. Suberb’ case, and the recent ‘Swiggy domain name dispute’. Simultaneously, the High Court of Delhi declaring the stylized logo of the French luxury brand, Hermes as awell-known trade mark also indicates the Courts sheer eagerness in recognising and safeguarding the transborder reputation enjoyed by notable international marks. This edition also tracks an interesting litigation centred around design infringement where the Court passed injunction in order to protect the registered keyboard design of the Japanese company, Casio. The judgement is likely to have a positive impact on the existing framework concerning Industrial Design in India. A few snippets of this edition that are worth reading include the underlying tussle between Zee Music and Spotify, Joan Mitchell Foundation issuing Cease and Desist to Louis Vuitton over use of paintings in handbag advertisements, and NFT and Metaverse related trade mark filings of Yves Saint Laurent and Amazon. So, without further ado, let’s dive into this edition!
This is a presentation of Intellectual property rights , how can we use them , what are its benefits and how the intellectual property is protected under these laws.
The project describes the Intellectual Property Acts and their violation by different companies. It covers many examples of IPR and their penalties on violation.
Patent Thickets: An Intertwining Web of Inventionskashishworld
In the words of Carl Shapiro, an American economist, a patent thicket is "a dense web of overlapping Intellectual Property Rights that a company must hack its way through to commercialize new technology."
Voiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box.pdfkashishworld
Voiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box office since they majorly influence the emotional sync between the audience and the visuals projected.
The Intellectual Property Right Induced Conundrum: To Repair or Not?kashishworld
Although a great marketing technique, co-branding is fused with the concept of cross-licensing of trademarks of different entities. The entities forge their trademarks to bring about a new product to attract consumer interest, which, in turn, increases sales.
A compilation is a work formed by a collection of already existing literature of data assembled through selection and arrangement in a manner to constitute an original work of authorship.
The term 'neighboring rights' can be found in the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Glossary, which can be understood as a right granted to protect the interests of performers, producers of phonograms, and broadcasting organizations relating to the activities of the public use of an author's work.
Safeguarding Fashion Shows: Copyright Laws on the Runwaykashishworld
Contemporary fashion shows involve the projection of stories and performances for which substantial investments and hustling of creative minds are required.
Proprietors of brands are increasingly looking for unconventional mediums to create an edge in the market. In this scenario, non-traditional trademarks like sound marks, texture marks, holograms, motion marks, and gesture marks hold utmost importance.
Brain Interfacing Systems & the Interplay of IPRskashishworld
This article sheds light on brain interfacing systems from the angle of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) to understand the apparent protections and hidden deficits in law.
Biopiracy a trespass against indigenous liveskashishworld
Biopiracy is the practice of commercial exploitation of indigenous knowledge regarding the beneficial use of plants and animals, including the biochemicals or genetic materials contained there within that occur naturally. Go through the blog to know how biopiracy is a trespass against indigenous lives.
Linking trademarks and character merchandisingkashishworld
'Trademark Merchandising' is more popularly known as 'Character Merchandising,' which is the second adaptation of fictional or non-fictional characters by using them concerning goods and services to gain prospective customers due to such close affinity. Go through the blog to know more about trademarks and character merchandising.
The 5th edition of IP Flavors includes articles and blog posts, quick-hit trend pieces, the new intellectual property law in Chile, and a lot more exclusive stuff all about IP.
IP Flavors 2nd Edition - IP Protection & Enforcement in the Indian Sub-Continentkashishworld
The 2nd edition of IP Flavors focuses entirely on 'Intellectual Property Protection and Enforcement in the Indian Sub-Continent.' Go through this edition to know what's exclusive about it and explore the unknown.
The 3rd edition of IP Flavors presents exclusive information about IP including quick-hit trend pieces, significant changes in IP laws over the past 25 years, detailed expert analysis of the US Trademark Modernization Act of 2020, to name a few.
The 4th Edition of IP Flavors includes IP News in Brief, IP Blog Posts, an Article on COVID-19 Vaccines and Patent Rights, and a lot more engaging stuff all about IP!
Trademark Registration- Pacific Island Nationskashishworld
The laws of Trademark Protection and Registration in key pacific island nations, including Fiji, Kiribati, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu.
The industrial property_act_2019_mauritiuskashishworld
The Industrial Property Act 2019 has been recently passed by the Mauritius Parliament on 30th July 2019 with an objective of updating and strengthening Intellectual Property Protection in a way that is harmonized to deal with the challenges faced in the present globalized economy.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
Debt Mapping Camp bebas riba to know how much our debt
Previous judgments walking down the lane to 2021
1. Previous Judgments: Walking Down the Lane to 2021
1. The Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. v. Entertainment Network
(India) Ltd., Delhi High Court, 4th
January 2021
The case was brought forth to the Delhi High Court to seek relief against the
infringement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) concerning both sound
recordings and the underlying literary and musical works, which meant that
separate licenses would be required to be taken for each one of these. However,
contrary to the precedents set by the Delhi High Court, the Court held that the
underlying works were not utilized while making use of a sound recording, and
hence, no royalty shall be charged as no permission is required from the authors of
the underlying works. It raises a lot of questions as to whether or not this is what
the legislature intended while amending the Copyright Act in 2012.
2. 2. India's First Anti-Anti-Suit Injunction: InterDigital Technology Corp.
& Ors. v. Xiaomi Corp. & Ors., Delhi High Court
InterDigital filed a suit against Xiaomi Corp. for infringing their Standard
Essential Patents (SEPs) thereby, praying for the determination of a Fair,
Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) royalty rate. Before this suit, a
case had already been filed in the Wuhan Court where an anti-suit injunction was
passed against the Plaintiff. InterDigital sought to set aside this anti-suit injunction
while applying to the Delhi High Court for an anti-anti-suit injunction by stating
that it is restrictive in practice.
The Delhi High Court decided in favor of the Plaintiff, stating the matter for
adjudication before both the courts were different from one another, which is why
the anti-suit injunction passed by the Wuhan Court would cease to have effect in
the concurrent matter. However, this controversial standpoint is most likely to
result in a series of other conflicts since both the Wuhan Court and the Delhi High
3. Court will soon deduce the FRAND rates applicable; eventually, the overlapping
of these rates is inescapable. Therefore, this decision is a doorway to newfound
confusion.
3. Krishna Kishore Singh v. Sarla A. Saraogi & Ors., Delhi High Court
This case deals with post-partum personality rights of the late actor Sushant Singh
Rajput wherein the Plaintiff filed a suit to restrain the Defendants from using
Sushant's name or personality in movies or series, namely, 'NYAY- The Justice,
Suicide or Murder' as it violated Article 21, including publicity rights.
The Court concluded that celebrity rights end with the end of the lifecycle of a
celebrity, and a declaimer used by the Defendant sufficiently bolstered against any
infringement. The Court held that the freedom of expression prevails over Article
21, and hence, no rights of publicity in the said film or series stand infringed.
4. 4. Sony Pictures Network India Pvt. Ltd. v. www.sportsala.tv & Ors.,
High Court of Delhi, CS (COMM) 289/2021
In this case, the Plaintiff had filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against
reproducing, distributing, and broadcasting the cricket matches held during India's
tours to England and Sri Lanka.
The Court decided in favor of the Plaintiff, which included not only the direct
infringers but also their redirects, mirrors, and alpha-numeric versions. An order
was also passed requiring the internet service providers to block rogue websites.
5. Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., United States Court of Appeals
The longstanding case dealt with Google, which, while developing its android
system, made abundant and substantial use of an Application Programming
Interface (API) that belonged to Java programming language, presently owned by
Oracle America.
5. The Court re-read the rules under the Doctrine of Fair Use and decided in favor of
public interest and proliferation of smartphone technology. The Court held that
there was no infringement case as the Android system was not intended to
substitute the Java SE and the Applicant's use was de minimis. This ruling has
raised eyebrows since the dissenting minority (6:2) opined on the stance and intent
of the Copyright Law on software.
6. Income Tax Commission v. Engineering Analysis Centre for
Excellence Private Limited
This case threw light on the extent of the applicability of the copyright Doctrine of
Exhaustion in the realm of software and online products and as to whether or not
they can be regulated under the EULA (End-User Licensing Agreement). The High
Court adjudged that the software in question consisted of certain interests in their
copyright, which account to be held as 'income' under the Income Tax Act, and
therefore, require the deduction of the said tax at the source itself.
Furthermore, the Court, while deducing the intent of the law-makers, held that the
doctrine of exhaustion extends to computer programs as the legislature removed
the expression "despite whether such copy has been given/sold on hire on previous
occasions" from Section 14(b)(ii) in the Copyright Amendment Act, 1999. The
Court also held that when a copyrighted work is conveyed to a distributor, it does
not automatically lead to the first sale.
7. H Lundbeck A/S v. Hetero Drugs Ltd [Delhi High Court]
6. In this case, the Delhi High Court expanded the scope of rights afforded to the
proprietor under section 48 of the Patents Act while interpreting Section 107 of
the said legislation. There was an anti-depressant involved, namely, 'Vortioxetin,'
the API (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient) of which was alleged to be imported
and then exported by Hetero Drugs.
Herter Drugs defended themselves, stating that the drug was not used in India in
commercial parlance and was only being utilized for research and development
purposes. The Court, while interpreting the word, held that an act of import or
export is said to fall within the premise of 'use,' especially when Hetero failed to
prove that the use was for research.
8. Golden Tobie Private Ltd. v. Golden Tobacco Ltd
The Delhi High Court clarified the standpoint of the Supreme Court in the
precedent set under Vidya Drolia and Ors v. Durga Trading Company wherein it
was held that certain disputes are not arbitrable and the grand issue of patents as
well as registration of marks also fell in the like bracket since these are sovereign
rights exercised by governmental authorities only. In the current case, the Plaintiff
was granted a trademark license that was non-transferable and non-assignable in
nature through an agreement for selling and making available the Defendant's
brand to national and international audiences.
The Court herein stated that there is a difference between cases directly dealing
with Intellectual Property (IP) issues arising directly in cases and the ones that
are indirectly concerning IP. Therefore, the case established that the bar on the
arbitrability of disputes about trademarks is not absolute in nature.
7. 9. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. v. Cipla Ltd
The Madras High Court in the case reaffirmed the seriousness of trademark
and Copyright Infringement even if it lies against the public interest. In this case,
Sun Pharmaceuticals was alleged to have infringed upon Cipla's copyright and
trademark, against which Cipla had filed for a permanent injunction. Sun pharma's
defense that the counterpart had stocked up enormous amounts of the trademarked
goods, which were vital for patients suffering from major symptoms of Covid-19
virus and would expire if not consumed within a year's duration, and therefore, the
said litigation should be set aside to allow commercialization of the same served no
good before the Court.
The Court held that the argument of public interest did not have any bearing on the
question of Trademark Infringement, and therefore, no shelter could be sought in
such name to promote violation of proprietary rights.
10. Sanjay Soya Private Limited v. Narayani Trading Company
In this case, the Bombay High Court altered and addressed the flawed precedent
laid under Dhiraj Dewani v. Sonal Infosystems, wherein it was held that proof of
Copyright Registration is a prerequisite to claiming relief against copyright
infringement. In this case, the Court, while stating the Dhiraj case, held that it is
not necessary to have a copyright registration certificate to seek relief under the
Act.
11. Tata Sons Private Limited v. Hakunamatata Tata Founders
8. In this case, the Plaintiff approached the Court seeking a permanent injunction
against the Defendant to restrain them from using the trademark 'TATA' as a part
of their corporation's name and domain name with their business established in the
UK and the US. Since the Plaintiff failed to establish a case in their favor, the
balance of convincing sided with the Defendants.
Therefore, the Court sided with the Defendants and concluded that the Trade
Marks Act and the Civil Procedure Code are territorial in nature and do not extend
beyond the borders of India. The like rule applies to entities established beyond the
Indian jurisdiction. They are required to establish the connection between the
activity of the foreign-seated defendants and India; moreover, specifically, the
defendant's intent to target India must be established.