Este documento presenta un método de entrenamiento para operadores de torres de enfriamiento llamado "Cooling Tower Coaching". El entrenamiento se centra en mejorar el rendimiento a través de estrategias, enfoque, liderazgo, creatividad y uso de tecnología. El coaching incluye pruebas, manuales, aprendizaje práctico, libros de métricas y sesiones de asesoramiento para enseñar perfeccionismo y compartir conocimiento. El objetivo final es establecer una conexión poderosa entre el operador y
Virtual Third Places, Making Room in the Law MarketMichele DeStefano
The common conception is that inventions are discovered by a scientist, alone in a lab, coming upon the “a-ha” or “eureka” moment, but that is often not the case. Instead, it is the interactions that scientists have with others that lead to breakthroughs. Exaptation (as opposed to adaptation) occurs when something is borrowed from one field and used to solve a problem in a totally unrelated field. In other words, innovation often comes from “refurbished” parts as opposed to newfangled creation. It is the result of exposure to ideas outside the immediate focus of interest, broad diverse connections and networks. Clearly, the legal marketplace could benefit from innovation and exaptation. The question is, however, given the restrictive regulations and legal structure within the U.S. and the global nature of the legal profession, how can the U.S. legal profession create environments that foster these diverse and eclectic connections that create the accidental combination of ingredients? This presentation attempts to answers this question by borrowing (i.e., exapting) - from other fields. It suggests that the answer is a technological one: the legal marketplace could benefit from developing Virtual Third Places. A “third place,” according to the sociologist and anthropologist Ray Oldenburg, is an environment that enables connections among people from different disciplines, and is set apart from traditional meeting places like the home or office. Utilizing some real world examples, this presentation attempts to demonstrate that the ideal third place for US lawyers and legal educators is a virtual one that promotes creative interaction among people from different disciplines, backgrounds, and political views, with various types and levels of expertise and passions.
Este documento presenta los hechos sobre la exploración espacial, incluyendo que es extremadamente costosa, y discute varias opiniones a favor y en contra de la exploración espacial. A favor se argumenta que proporciona avances científicos y tecnológicos útiles, y que podría permitir el acceso a recursos del sistema solar. En contra se señala que el dinero podría usarse para resolver problemas en la Tierra y que es peligrosa debido a las pérdidas humanas. El documento concluye pidiendo la opinión de los
Những đúc kết quý báu từ chú Lương Sơn, tốt nghiệp MIT, chủ tịch Vietsoftware trong quá trình khởi nghiệp. Mình vẫn luôn tâm niệm rằng thất bại là một trong những cái giá tất yếu của thành công, nhưng biết trước những cạm bẫy hoặc khó khăn sắp vấp phải, sẽ làm bạn tự chuẩn bị bản thân tốt hơn, để có thể maximize trải nghiệm, nhưng lại minimize rủi ro ...Và đây là một câu mà chú nói làm mình phải luôn ghi nhớ: "Chú luôn cổ vũ các bạn trẻ lập nghiệp, nhưng cũng luôn quan tâm đến việc làm sao các bạn thành công mà không phải trả giá đắt như những người đi trước."
Este documento presenta un método de entrenamiento para operadores de torres de enfriamiento llamado "Cooling Tower Coaching". El entrenamiento se centra en mejorar el rendimiento a través de estrategias, enfoque, liderazgo, creatividad y uso de tecnología. El coaching incluye pruebas, manuales, aprendizaje práctico, libros de métricas y sesiones de asesoramiento para enseñar perfeccionismo y compartir conocimiento. El objetivo final es establecer una conexión poderosa entre el operador y
Virtual Third Places, Making Room in the Law MarketMichele DeStefano
The common conception is that inventions are discovered by a scientist, alone in a lab, coming upon the “a-ha” or “eureka” moment, but that is often not the case. Instead, it is the interactions that scientists have with others that lead to breakthroughs. Exaptation (as opposed to adaptation) occurs when something is borrowed from one field and used to solve a problem in a totally unrelated field. In other words, innovation often comes from “refurbished” parts as opposed to newfangled creation. It is the result of exposure to ideas outside the immediate focus of interest, broad diverse connections and networks. Clearly, the legal marketplace could benefit from innovation and exaptation. The question is, however, given the restrictive regulations and legal structure within the U.S. and the global nature of the legal profession, how can the U.S. legal profession create environments that foster these diverse and eclectic connections that create the accidental combination of ingredients? This presentation attempts to answers this question by borrowing (i.e., exapting) - from other fields. It suggests that the answer is a technological one: the legal marketplace could benefit from developing Virtual Third Places. A “third place,” according to the sociologist and anthropologist Ray Oldenburg, is an environment that enables connections among people from different disciplines, and is set apart from traditional meeting places like the home or office. Utilizing some real world examples, this presentation attempts to demonstrate that the ideal third place for US lawyers and legal educators is a virtual one that promotes creative interaction among people from different disciplines, backgrounds, and political views, with various types and levels of expertise and passions.
Este documento presenta los hechos sobre la exploración espacial, incluyendo que es extremadamente costosa, y discute varias opiniones a favor y en contra de la exploración espacial. A favor se argumenta que proporciona avances científicos y tecnológicos útiles, y que podría permitir el acceso a recursos del sistema solar. En contra se señala que el dinero podría usarse para resolver problemas en la Tierra y que es peligrosa debido a las pérdidas humanas. El documento concluye pidiendo la opinión de los
Những đúc kết quý báu từ chú Lương Sơn, tốt nghiệp MIT, chủ tịch Vietsoftware trong quá trình khởi nghiệp. Mình vẫn luôn tâm niệm rằng thất bại là một trong những cái giá tất yếu của thành công, nhưng biết trước những cạm bẫy hoặc khó khăn sắp vấp phải, sẽ làm bạn tự chuẩn bị bản thân tốt hơn, để có thể maximize trải nghiệm, nhưng lại minimize rủi ro ...Và đây là một câu mà chú nói làm mình phải luôn ghi nhớ: "Chú luôn cổ vũ các bạn trẻ lập nghiệp, nhưng cũng luôn quan tâm đến việc làm sao các bạn thành công mà không phải trả giá đắt như những người đi trước."
Ammaron Yates is a business management major with an emphasis in marketing and minor in finance who aspires to be a market manager at American Builders & Contractors Supply Co. based on his two years of successful sales experience and management skills as well as his reliability, problem solving abilities, and motivation of others. He believes that business interests him, can achieve his goals of success and good relationships, and that BYUI will help him maintain a religious perspective in his career.
The document provides information about Lucie jewellery brand. It summarizes that Lucie jewellery is handcrafted in Asia and France using silver, gold, enamel and real or synthetic stones. It is designed for women and features unique designs that are not found online to prevent copying. Synthetic stones are used to be environmentally friendly and look identical to real stones. Each piece is unique artwork.
DeStefano, Compliance, Transparency, Visibility: A U.S. Perspective: Cloudy A...Michele DeStefano
This document summarizes a presentation given by Michele DeStefano at a meeting in Munich, Germany in October 2014. The presentation discusses the evolution of corporate compliance programs in the United States and challenges faced by Chief Compliance Officers. It also hypothesizes that efforts to increase compliance, transparency, and visibility through measures like separating compliance from legal departments may be "cloudy at best" and not achieve their objectives. The document outlines arguments for why departmentalization may not increase actual compliance, transparency, or visibility and entrenchment of compliance programs. It concludes by recommending corporations look inward at decision-making processes and culture beneath formal structures.
Enriching Globalization With Low Cost Tech & Social Media: Serving More than ...Michele DeStefano
This presentation explores the types of low cost tech and social media tools that can be used to enrich globalization and legal education in general and the reasons why legal educations should use these tools.
DeStefano, Alternative Litigation Funders and Claim Holders: A Common Intere...Michele DeStefano
To date, there is little agreement on whether communications and work resulting from the relationship between claim funders, commercial claim holders, and their lawyers should be protected by either the attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine. And there is much debate about whether and how the common interest doctrine might be used to support or deny attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine protection in this context. In order to shed light on this debate, this Article reviews and analyzes the case law that exists in the claim funding context and analogizes and compares it to that in other areas such as public relations, patent law, and insurance. Ultimately, it argues that given the reasoning applying exceptions to waiver in other contexts, presumptions that the attorney-client privilege does not apply and that the work product does are misplaced. Claim funders may share a common interest with commercial claim holders and both the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine should from a normative and theoretical standpoint apply in some (but not all) situations. That said, given the sensitive issues involved with and arguments against claim funding, and the precariousness of both privilege doctrines, it predicts, that, in practice, privilege protection will not be effectuated to the degree with which the doctrine might support. This is because the issues involved with and arguments against claim funding are common ones used by the ABA and other entities as stopgaps to prevent infringement on the sanctity of the lawyer-client relationship, the reputation of the profession, and lawyers’ monopoly of legal and law-related services. As in the other contexts, (like public relations), if courts view claim funding as a threat to the independence of the lawyer or something that degrades the profession or eats away at lawyers’ monopoly, they have the ability (under the doctrine) to deny protection of the communications. Thus, the article concludes with some advice to claimholders, lawyers, and claim funders for how to navigate the current (and future) unpredictable privilege landscape.
DeStefano, Extrapreneurs, Interdependence, & a Law Without WallsMichele DeStefano
Today, two questions are commonly asked by professionals in the United States law market: 1) When are legal educators going to start training our law students with the skills to be the global 21st Century lawyers of tomorrow? and 2) When is legal practice going to innovate to tackle the challenges of our “new” global marketplace? At the heart of these two questions is the assumption that it is not legal education’s responsibility to change the way law is practiced and that it is not practicing lawyers’ responsibility to change the way future lawyers are educated in law school. It is this assumption that I intend to challenge here.
Specifically, I will argue that although there has been recent innovation in legal education and practice, the answer to law’s problems lies, in part, in changing the relationship between legal education and practice. I will argue that the relationship between legal education and practice should be based on a model of extrapreneurship, interdependence, and collaboration. The relationship should be an iterative partnership with a mentality of law without walls
De stefano, Global Lawyers + Global Law Schools: Entering the Innovation Tour...Michele DeStefano
This presentation will highlight recent trends in the global legal marketplace that are impacting what and how lawyers practice and what and how legal educators teach. It will make some predictions about the future ecosystem of the legal profession that will transform the way lawyers and business professionals partner together to solve problems. From a practical standpoint, the presentation will identify the skills the lawyers of tomorrow need to hone in order to successfully navigate this new landscape and suggest ways legal educators and law firms can help the lawyers of tomorrow hone these skills.
DeStefano, Lawyers Influencing Nonlawyers: Too Many Cooks in the Kitchen or S...Michele DeStefano
The U.S. legal profession is in need of innovation and innovation comes from open, collaborative, and diverse environments. Yet, the rules regulating the U.S. legal profession foster a closed environment, one that discourages nonlawyer influence on lawyers and alliances between legal and non-legal professionals. The Model Rules of Professional Conduct, the bar licensing requirements, the application of the work- product doctrine and attorney-client privilege, and even the way law firms structure themselves consistently impede an open multi-disciplinary approach. Instead, they favor a closed environment and/or an exclusive one-on-one relationship between attorneys and their clients. In some way or another, they support the notion that when lawyers work with nonlawyers, there are too many cooks in the kitchen.
In light of our growing understanding of other fields, it may be time to reexamine some of these rules and their underlying assumptions. First, they do not represent the way many U.S. lawyers actually practice. Second, in an economic downturn, where the line between what is business and what is law is anything but clear, such tactics may limit lawyers’ range of business opportunities. Instead of protecting lawyers’ economic futures, it may provide the impetus for nonlawyers, who want a piece of the lawyers’ pie, to innovate. Essentially, an environment that fosters input from nonlawyers is better than a closed one and the legal profession’s continued attachment to rules and structures that compel closed environments and severely restrict the influence of nonlawyers on lawyers (at least in the commercial context) may leave the U.S. legal profession woefully behind other countries, and U.S. lawyers with a smaller piece of the pie.
Beyond Benchmarking, How Should Law and Corporate Compliance IntersectMichele DeStefano
In this post melt-down climate, the regulatory environment raises questions about the compliance function in large, publicly traded corporations. What is it? What purpose does and should it serve? How is the compliance function different or the same as the legal, ethics, or risk management functions? And who should oversee compliance? Although some exists, more empirical research should be done on what function a compliance department serves, where compliance is currently housed in large, publicly traded corporations and, more importantly, why corporations have located the compliance function within or outside the legal department. Further, no other study to date entails qualitative research with United States’ general counsels, chief compliance officers and other non-lawyer senior management on these issues. The purpose of this project is to explore the following questions: (i) What is compliance? What is the major purpose of a compliance department, what areas does it cover (ii) How is it managed and where is it currently housed in large, publicly traded corporations, and (iii) What are the risks and benefits of having the compliance function separated from the legal department and run by non-lawyers (or non-practicing lawyers) that report to the CEO and/or board of directors? To investigate these questions, I i) talked briefly with forty general counsels of S&P 500 corporations in banking, pharmaceutical, and petroleum industries about compliance within their organization; and ii) conducted thirty in-depth qualitative interviews with general counsels and chief compliance officers of large, publicly traded corporations across a variety of industries.
The research analysis will lead to a series of articles. The first article, Transitioning Corporate Governance to Compliance will take the position that a transition in corporate governance has occurred over the past 20 years. What might have been thought of 20 years ago as the basic corporate governance function is now being ceded to compliance departments in large publicly traded organizations. This article will overview of what role the compliance function at some large, publicly traded corporations serves. Through the voices of the Compliance Study interviewees, it will analyze and present a typology of roles that compliance officers may play and recommend which role is the ideal one.
The second article, The Government’s Unofficial Stance on Compliance Departments: To Comply or Not to Comply? will analyze the question of whether whether compliance should be separated from the legal department. To that end, it will explore the risks and benefits of such a structure and the limitations that exist when the compliance function is led by the general counsel.
DeStefano, claim funders and stone soup hls 11 12-12Michele DeStefano
The broad thesis of this presentation is that an environment that fosters input from nonlawyers is better than a closed one, and that the time has come to rethink the U.S. legal profession's rules and structures that were designed to narrow exposure to, and influence by, nonlawyers. To illustrate this contention, this presentation highlights one recent movement in the globalized legal marketplace that remains stymied in the United States: nonlawyer investment in claims i.e., claim funding. [The current rules and regulations governing nonlawyer investment in claims epitomize the U.S. legal profession's stance on collaboration between law- yers and nonlawyers. Many states completely outlaw claim funding by nonlawyers based on outdated and arguably inaccurate interpretations of the ancient doctrines of maintenance, interfering in a legal proceeding by a third party that is not a party to the suit; champerty, maintenance for a profit; and barratry, inciting litigation. Although some states have abolished these antiquated barriers to claim funding, many states make approval contingent on the third-party funder having absolutely no control, input, or influence over litigation decisions and case management--a rule that, as a practical matter, is unrealistic.
This presentation starts with the premise that law is a business, and thus the legal market cannot be insulated from capital markets. Because what happens in other parts of the world invariably affects what happens in the United States, there will be strong pressure for the United States to allow investment in claims in all fifty states, and to a greater degree than currently allowed. Although the bar may be able to resist buy-in for some unpredict- able but possibly significant period of time, this presentation contends that lawyers and clients will potentially benefit if the U.S. bar embraces claim funding in the commercial context and implements a regulatory system to maximize its advantages and minimize its potential risks. Further, this presentation utilizes the example of claim funding to show that granting nonlawyers more influence could stimulate much needed innovation in the provision and management of legal services, enhance problem solving and efficiency for the benefit of clients and society, and in- crease lawyer's ability to compete in a global marketplace. Instead of equating outside influence by nonlawyers with having “too many cooks in the kitchen,” the U.S. legal profession could take advantage of a regulated level of influence to help create the richest stone soup possible.
ResearcherID, ResearchGate, etc. : quels outils pour votre profil chercheur (...Frédérique Flamerie
Enjeux
Famille n° 1 : les réseaux sociaux (ResearchGate)
Famille n° 2 : les identifiants éditeur (ResearcherId) (+ SciENcv, même si pas identifiant)
Famille n° 3 : les identifiants pérennes (ORCID)
Famille n° 4 : les archives ouvertes (HAL)
KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA TIPS | SATTA MATKA | MATKA.COM | MATKA PANA JODI TODAY | BATTA SATKA | MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER | MATKA RESULTS | MATKA CHART | MATKA JODI | SATTA COM | FULL RATE GAME | MATKA GAME | MATKA WAPKA | ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA RESULT | DPBOSS MATKA 143 | MAIN MATKA
Ammaron Yates is a business management major with an emphasis in marketing and minor in finance who aspires to be a market manager at American Builders & Contractors Supply Co. based on his two years of successful sales experience and management skills as well as his reliability, problem solving abilities, and motivation of others. He believes that business interests him, can achieve his goals of success and good relationships, and that BYUI will help him maintain a religious perspective in his career.
The document provides information about Lucie jewellery brand. It summarizes that Lucie jewellery is handcrafted in Asia and France using silver, gold, enamel and real or synthetic stones. It is designed for women and features unique designs that are not found online to prevent copying. Synthetic stones are used to be environmentally friendly and look identical to real stones. Each piece is unique artwork.
DeStefano, Compliance, Transparency, Visibility: A U.S. Perspective: Cloudy A...Michele DeStefano
This document summarizes a presentation given by Michele DeStefano at a meeting in Munich, Germany in October 2014. The presentation discusses the evolution of corporate compliance programs in the United States and challenges faced by Chief Compliance Officers. It also hypothesizes that efforts to increase compliance, transparency, and visibility through measures like separating compliance from legal departments may be "cloudy at best" and not achieve their objectives. The document outlines arguments for why departmentalization may not increase actual compliance, transparency, or visibility and entrenchment of compliance programs. It concludes by recommending corporations look inward at decision-making processes and culture beneath formal structures.
Enriching Globalization With Low Cost Tech & Social Media: Serving More than ...Michele DeStefano
This presentation explores the types of low cost tech and social media tools that can be used to enrich globalization and legal education in general and the reasons why legal educations should use these tools.
DeStefano, Alternative Litigation Funders and Claim Holders: A Common Intere...Michele DeStefano
To date, there is little agreement on whether communications and work resulting from the relationship between claim funders, commercial claim holders, and their lawyers should be protected by either the attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine. And there is much debate about whether and how the common interest doctrine might be used to support or deny attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine protection in this context. In order to shed light on this debate, this Article reviews and analyzes the case law that exists in the claim funding context and analogizes and compares it to that in other areas such as public relations, patent law, and insurance. Ultimately, it argues that given the reasoning applying exceptions to waiver in other contexts, presumptions that the attorney-client privilege does not apply and that the work product does are misplaced. Claim funders may share a common interest with commercial claim holders and both the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine should from a normative and theoretical standpoint apply in some (but not all) situations. That said, given the sensitive issues involved with and arguments against claim funding, and the precariousness of both privilege doctrines, it predicts, that, in practice, privilege protection will not be effectuated to the degree with which the doctrine might support. This is because the issues involved with and arguments against claim funding are common ones used by the ABA and other entities as stopgaps to prevent infringement on the sanctity of the lawyer-client relationship, the reputation of the profession, and lawyers’ monopoly of legal and law-related services. As in the other contexts, (like public relations), if courts view claim funding as a threat to the independence of the lawyer or something that degrades the profession or eats away at lawyers’ monopoly, they have the ability (under the doctrine) to deny protection of the communications. Thus, the article concludes with some advice to claimholders, lawyers, and claim funders for how to navigate the current (and future) unpredictable privilege landscape.
DeStefano, Extrapreneurs, Interdependence, & a Law Without WallsMichele DeStefano
Today, two questions are commonly asked by professionals in the United States law market: 1) When are legal educators going to start training our law students with the skills to be the global 21st Century lawyers of tomorrow? and 2) When is legal practice going to innovate to tackle the challenges of our “new” global marketplace? At the heart of these two questions is the assumption that it is not legal education’s responsibility to change the way law is practiced and that it is not practicing lawyers’ responsibility to change the way future lawyers are educated in law school. It is this assumption that I intend to challenge here.
Specifically, I will argue that although there has been recent innovation in legal education and practice, the answer to law’s problems lies, in part, in changing the relationship between legal education and practice. I will argue that the relationship between legal education and practice should be based on a model of extrapreneurship, interdependence, and collaboration. The relationship should be an iterative partnership with a mentality of law without walls
De stefano, Global Lawyers + Global Law Schools: Entering the Innovation Tour...Michele DeStefano
This presentation will highlight recent trends in the global legal marketplace that are impacting what and how lawyers practice and what and how legal educators teach. It will make some predictions about the future ecosystem of the legal profession that will transform the way lawyers and business professionals partner together to solve problems. From a practical standpoint, the presentation will identify the skills the lawyers of tomorrow need to hone in order to successfully navigate this new landscape and suggest ways legal educators and law firms can help the lawyers of tomorrow hone these skills.
DeStefano, Lawyers Influencing Nonlawyers: Too Many Cooks in the Kitchen or S...Michele DeStefano
The U.S. legal profession is in need of innovation and innovation comes from open, collaborative, and diverse environments. Yet, the rules regulating the U.S. legal profession foster a closed environment, one that discourages nonlawyer influence on lawyers and alliances between legal and non-legal professionals. The Model Rules of Professional Conduct, the bar licensing requirements, the application of the work- product doctrine and attorney-client privilege, and even the way law firms structure themselves consistently impede an open multi-disciplinary approach. Instead, they favor a closed environment and/or an exclusive one-on-one relationship between attorneys and their clients. In some way or another, they support the notion that when lawyers work with nonlawyers, there are too many cooks in the kitchen.
In light of our growing understanding of other fields, it may be time to reexamine some of these rules and their underlying assumptions. First, they do not represent the way many U.S. lawyers actually practice. Second, in an economic downturn, where the line between what is business and what is law is anything but clear, such tactics may limit lawyers’ range of business opportunities. Instead of protecting lawyers’ economic futures, it may provide the impetus for nonlawyers, who want a piece of the lawyers’ pie, to innovate. Essentially, an environment that fosters input from nonlawyers is better than a closed one and the legal profession’s continued attachment to rules and structures that compel closed environments and severely restrict the influence of nonlawyers on lawyers (at least in the commercial context) may leave the U.S. legal profession woefully behind other countries, and U.S. lawyers with a smaller piece of the pie.
Beyond Benchmarking, How Should Law and Corporate Compliance IntersectMichele DeStefano
In this post melt-down climate, the regulatory environment raises questions about the compliance function in large, publicly traded corporations. What is it? What purpose does and should it serve? How is the compliance function different or the same as the legal, ethics, or risk management functions? And who should oversee compliance? Although some exists, more empirical research should be done on what function a compliance department serves, where compliance is currently housed in large, publicly traded corporations and, more importantly, why corporations have located the compliance function within or outside the legal department. Further, no other study to date entails qualitative research with United States’ general counsels, chief compliance officers and other non-lawyer senior management on these issues. The purpose of this project is to explore the following questions: (i) What is compliance? What is the major purpose of a compliance department, what areas does it cover (ii) How is it managed and where is it currently housed in large, publicly traded corporations, and (iii) What are the risks and benefits of having the compliance function separated from the legal department and run by non-lawyers (or non-practicing lawyers) that report to the CEO and/or board of directors? To investigate these questions, I i) talked briefly with forty general counsels of S&P 500 corporations in banking, pharmaceutical, and petroleum industries about compliance within their organization; and ii) conducted thirty in-depth qualitative interviews with general counsels and chief compliance officers of large, publicly traded corporations across a variety of industries.
The research analysis will lead to a series of articles. The first article, Transitioning Corporate Governance to Compliance will take the position that a transition in corporate governance has occurred over the past 20 years. What might have been thought of 20 years ago as the basic corporate governance function is now being ceded to compliance departments in large publicly traded organizations. This article will overview of what role the compliance function at some large, publicly traded corporations serves. Through the voices of the Compliance Study interviewees, it will analyze and present a typology of roles that compliance officers may play and recommend which role is the ideal one.
The second article, The Government’s Unofficial Stance on Compliance Departments: To Comply or Not to Comply? will analyze the question of whether whether compliance should be separated from the legal department. To that end, it will explore the risks and benefits of such a structure and the limitations that exist when the compliance function is led by the general counsel.
DeStefano, claim funders and stone soup hls 11 12-12Michele DeStefano
The broad thesis of this presentation is that an environment that fosters input from nonlawyers is better than a closed one, and that the time has come to rethink the U.S. legal profession's rules and structures that were designed to narrow exposure to, and influence by, nonlawyers. To illustrate this contention, this presentation highlights one recent movement in the globalized legal marketplace that remains stymied in the United States: nonlawyer investment in claims i.e., claim funding. [The current rules and regulations governing nonlawyer investment in claims epitomize the U.S. legal profession's stance on collaboration between law- yers and nonlawyers. Many states completely outlaw claim funding by nonlawyers based on outdated and arguably inaccurate interpretations of the ancient doctrines of maintenance, interfering in a legal proceeding by a third party that is not a party to the suit; champerty, maintenance for a profit; and barratry, inciting litigation. Although some states have abolished these antiquated barriers to claim funding, many states make approval contingent on the third-party funder having absolutely no control, input, or influence over litigation decisions and case management--a rule that, as a practical matter, is unrealistic.
This presentation starts with the premise that law is a business, and thus the legal market cannot be insulated from capital markets. Because what happens in other parts of the world invariably affects what happens in the United States, there will be strong pressure for the United States to allow investment in claims in all fifty states, and to a greater degree than currently allowed. Although the bar may be able to resist buy-in for some unpredict- able but possibly significant period of time, this presentation contends that lawyers and clients will potentially benefit if the U.S. bar embraces claim funding in the commercial context and implements a regulatory system to maximize its advantages and minimize its potential risks. Further, this presentation utilizes the example of claim funding to show that granting nonlawyers more influence could stimulate much needed innovation in the provision and management of legal services, enhance problem solving and efficiency for the benefit of clients and society, and in- crease lawyer's ability to compete in a global marketplace. Instead of equating outside influence by nonlawyers with having “too many cooks in the kitchen,” the U.S. legal profession could take advantage of a regulated level of influence to help create the richest stone soup possible.
ResearcherID, ResearchGate, etc. : quels outils pour votre profil chercheur (...Frédérique Flamerie
Enjeux
Famille n° 1 : les réseaux sociaux (ResearchGate)
Famille n° 2 : les identifiants éditeur (ResearcherId) (+ SciENcv, même si pas identifiant)
Famille n° 3 : les identifiants pérennes (ORCID)
Famille n° 4 : les archives ouvertes (HAL)
KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA TIPS | SATTA MATKA | MATKA.COM | MATKA PANA JODI TODAY | BATTA SATKA | MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER | MATKA RESULTS | MATKA CHART | MATKA JODI | SATTA COM | FULL RATE GAME | MATKA GAME | MATKA WAPKA | ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA RESULT | DPBOSS MATKA 143 | MAIN MATKA
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart Final Matka Satta Matta Matka 143 Kalyan Chart Satta fix Jodi Kalyan Final ank Matka Boss Satta 143 Matka 420 Golden Matka Final Satta Kalyan Penal Chart Dpboss 143 Guessing Kalyan Night Chart
Heart Touching Romantic Love Shayari In English with ImagesShort Good Quotes
Explore our beautiful collection of Romantic Love Shayari in English to express your love. These heartfelt shayaris are perfect for sharing with your loved one. Get the best words to show your love and care.
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Matka ! Fix Satta Matka ! Matka Result ! Matka Guessing ! Final Matka ! Matka Result ! Dpboss Matka ! Matka Guessing ! Satta Matta Matka 143 ! Kalyan Matka ! Satta Matka Fast Result ! Kalyan Matka Guessing ! Dpboss Matka Guessing ! Satta 143 ! Kalyan Chart ! Kalyan final ! Satta guessing ! Matka tips ! Matka 143 ! India Matka ! Matka 420 ! matka Mumbai ! Satta chart ! Indian Satta ! Satta King ! Satta 143 ! Satta batta ! Satta मटका ! Satta chart ! Matka 143 ! Matka Satta ! India Matka ! Indian Satta Matka ! Final ank