Public interest litigation basic understanding

2. Public interest litigation
• PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION
•
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is a legal mechanism that allows individuals or organizations to initiate litigation in a court of law on behalf
of the public interest, often to address issues that affect a large section of society or vulnerable groups. PIL plays a crucial role in
promoting social justice, protecting fundamental rights, and ensuring accountability of the government and other institutions.
• PIL originated in India in the 1970s as a tool for judicial activism and to provide access to justice to marginalized communities. It allows
any individual or group, including non-governmental organizations (NGOs), to approach the court directly by filing a petition, even if
they are not personally affected by the issue at hand. This is in contrast to traditional litigation, where only aggrieved parties have the
standing to file a case.
• One of the key features of PIL is its expansive scope, which enables it to address a wide range of issues such as environmental
protection, human rights violations, corruption, gender equality, and access to education and healthcare. PIL petitions can be filed in
various courts, including the Supreme Court, High Courts, and even lower courts, depending on the nature and gravity of the issue.
• The success of PIL depends on several factors, including the credibility of the petitioner, the legal merit of the case, andthe willingness
of the judiciary to intervene in matters of public concern. PIL cases often involve extensive research, documentation of evidence, and
advocacy efforts to mobilize public support and raise awareness about the issue.
• Over the years, PIL has led to several landmark judgments that have had a profound impact on Indian society. For example, inthe case
of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997), the Supreme Court laid down guidelines to prevent sexual harassment of women in the
workplace, known as the Vishaka Guidelines. Similarly, in the case of MC Mehta v. Union of India (1986), the court ordered the closure
of industries polluting the River Ganges, highlighting the role of PIL in environmental conservation.
• Despite its many benefits, PIL also faces criticism and challenges. Some critics argue that it can be misused for personal orpolitical
gains, leading to frivolous litigation and unnecessary burden on the judiciary. Moreover, PIL often relies on judicial activism, which some
view as an overreach of the judiciary into matters best left to the executive and legislative branches of government.
• In conclusion, Public Interest Litigation is a powerful tool for promoting social justice, protecting fundamental rights, andholding
institutions accountable. While it has contributed significantly to legal reform and societal change in India, its effectiveness depends on
the responsible use of the judicial process and the commitment of all stakeholders to uphold the public interest.
•