The document discusses the history and development of international law regarding the use of force. It outlines various treaties and agreements that have shaped this area of law over time, including the UN Charter which prohibits the use of force except in cases of self-defense or when authorized by the UN Security Council. The UN Charter and General Assembly Resolution 2625 provide the current framework that bans the use of aggressive force by states in their international relations.
This document discusses the international legal norms governing the use of force, known as jus ad bellum. It examines the prohibition on the use of force under the UN Charter and customary international law, as well as the exceptions for self-defense and Security Council authorized use of force. It also discusses debates around anticipatory self-defense, collective self-defense, the definition of armed attack, and other possible justifications for the use of force.
This document discusses two mechanisms for enforcing international law - the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the United Nations Security Council. It outlines the ICJ's jurisdiction over contentious cases between states and its ability to issue advisory opinions. It also describes the Security Council's role in peacefully settling disputes under Chapter VI of the UN Charter and its expanded powers under Chapter VII to address threats to international peace and security, including authorizing military force.
International Humanitarian Law Lecture 11 - International Armed ConflictNilendra Kumar
This presentation recognises two categories of armed conflicts. It further describes the applicability of the conventions specially where it is non international in the strict sense of the term.
1. The document discusses the sources and evolution of international law regarding the use of force, including customary international law, the UN Charter, and Security Council resolutions.
2. It analyzes key provisions of the UN Charter related to the prohibition on the use of force, collective security, and self-defense. Debate around the interpretation of these provisions is discussed.
3. Examples related to the Iraq war and "responsibility to protect" doctrine are provided to illustrate debates around exceptions to the prohibition on force.
This document analyzes the legality of the use of force in Libya as authorized by UN Security Council Resolution 1973. It begins with an introduction outlining the general prohibition on the use of force under international law, with two exceptions: force authorized by the UN Security Council or force used in self-defense.
The document then discusses the evolution of the ban on the use of force and the formation and purpose of the UN, which aims to prevent wars between states. It notes the UN Charter prohibits the threat or use of force, establishing the Security Council to maintain peace and security.
The document analyzes Resolution 1973, questioning whether peaceful measures under Article 41 of the UN Charter were adequately attempted before authorizing force under Article
NATO Intervention in Libya: Does Law Matters?Emmanuel Edward
On 19th March 2011, a multi- state NATO coalition started a military intervention against Libya. This paper tries to examines the legitimateness of the use of force in Libya under international law as approved by the United Nations Security Council through Resolution 1973.
This document discusses the legal framework governing armed conflict under international law. It outlines the purpose and key principles of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), including the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols. It also discusses the relationship between IHL and International Human Rights Law, and how both apply during armed conflict. Finally, it examines some of the challenges posed by contemporary armed conflicts, including issues around non-state armed groups and implementation of the law.
The document provides an overview of the evolution and key aspects of international criminal law. It discusses how international criminal law began with the Nuremberg trials after WWII, which established crimes like war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes of aggression. Since then, several ad hoc tribunals have been created to prosecute international crimes in conflicts like Rwanda and Yugoslavia. More recently, the permanent International Criminal Court was established in 2002 to prosecute genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression, while respecting the principle of complementarity giving domestic courts priority.
This document discusses the international legal norms governing the use of force, known as jus ad bellum. It examines the prohibition on the use of force under the UN Charter and customary international law, as well as the exceptions for self-defense and Security Council authorized use of force. It also discusses debates around anticipatory self-defense, collective self-defense, the definition of armed attack, and other possible justifications for the use of force.
This document discusses two mechanisms for enforcing international law - the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the United Nations Security Council. It outlines the ICJ's jurisdiction over contentious cases between states and its ability to issue advisory opinions. It also describes the Security Council's role in peacefully settling disputes under Chapter VI of the UN Charter and its expanded powers under Chapter VII to address threats to international peace and security, including authorizing military force.
International Humanitarian Law Lecture 11 - International Armed ConflictNilendra Kumar
This presentation recognises two categories of armed conflicts. It further describes the applicability of the conventions specially where it is non international in the strict sense of the term.
1. The document discusses the sources and evolution of international law regarding the use of force, including customary international law, the UN Charter, and Security Council resolutions.
2. It analyzes key provisions of the UN Charter related to the prohibition on the use of force, collective security, and self-defense. Debate around the interpretation of these provisions is discussed.
3. Examples related to the Iraq war and "responsibility to protect" doctrine are provided to illustrate debates around exceptions to the prohibition on force.
This document analyzes the legality of the use of force in Libya as authorized by UN Security Council Resolution 1973. It begins with an introduction outlining the general prohibition on the use of force under international law, with two exceptions: force authorized by the UN Security Council or force used in self-defense.
The document then discusses the evolution of the ban on the use of force and the formation and purpose of the UN, which aims to prevent wars between states. It notes the UN Charter prohibits the threat or use of force, establishing the Security Council to maintain peace and security.
The document analyzes Resolution 1973, questioning whether peaceful measures under Article 41 of the UN Charter were adequately attempted before authorizing force under Article
NATO Intervention in Libya: Does Law Matters?Emmanuel Edward
On 19th March 2011, a multi- state NATO coalition started a military intervention against Libya. This paper tries to examines the legitimateness of the use of force in Libya under international law as approved by the United Nations Security Council through Resolution 1973.
This document discusses the legal framework governing armed conflict under international law. It outlines the purpose and key principles of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), including the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols. It also discusses the relationship between IHL and International Human Rights Law, and how both apply during armed conflict. Finally, it examines some of the challenges posed by contemporary armed conflicts, including issues around non-state armed groups and implementation of the law.
The document provides an overview of the evolution and key aspects of international criminal law. It discusses how international criminal law began with the Nuremberg trials after WWII, which established crimes like war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes of aggression. Since then, several ad hoc tribunals have been created to prosecute international crimes in conflicts like Rwanda and Yugoslavia. More recently, the permanent International Criminal Court was established in 2002 to prosecute genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression, while respecting the principle of complementarity giving domestic courts priority.
International Humanitarian Law, (Lecture 15)- Distinction between internation...Nilendra Kumar
This presentation explains the nature of an armed conflict and the salient differences between international armed conflict and non international armed conflict while also highlighting its relevance there to.
The document discusses recent developments and challenges in international humanitarian law. It addresses changes in the nature of armed conflicts including their increasing complexity with multiple actors. It examines issues around qualifying situations of violence as international or non-international armed conflicts. It also discusses the development and application of international humanitarian law, including treaty law and challenges around classifying mixed or internationalized armed conflicts.
The document discusses the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC). It defines LOAC as the branch of international law that seeks to limit the effects of armed conflict by protecting non-combatants and restricting means and methods of warfare. LOAC applies to both international and non-international armed conflicts. It aims to protect civilians, prisoners of war, and limit unnecessary suffering. Key LOAC principles are military necessity, distinction between combatants and civilians, and proportionality in attacks. The Geneva Conventions of 1949 are important sources of LOAC rules governing treatment of wounded forces, prisoners of war, and civilians.
International humanitarian law presentationRida Khan
International Humanitarian Law (IHL) regulates the conduct of armed conflicts and seeks to limit human suffering. It originated in the 19th century and is now comprised of the Geneva Conventions and additional protocols that protect civilians, prisoners of war, and others not participating in hostilities. IHL applies in both international and non-international armed conflicts and restricts certain weapons and tactics while providing humanitarian protections and oversight of compliance.
International humanitarian law governs the conduct of armed conflict and seeks to limit its effects. It protects persons who are not or are no longer participating in the hostilities, as well as restricting the means and methods of warfare. The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols of 1977 are the core treaties of international humanitarian law. They protect the wounded, sick, shipwrecked, prisoners of war and civilians, and restrict warfare to discriminate between combatants and civilians. Violations of international humanitarian law that constitute grave breaches are considered war crimes.
INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW ENGLISH-BURMESE VERSIONMYO AUNG Myanmar
What is international humanitarian law?
Legal factsheet31 DECEMBER 2014
Fact sheet providing a summary description of the sources, content and field of application of international humanitarian law.
International humanitarian law is a set of rules which seek, for humanitarian reasons, to limit the effects of armed conflict. It protects persons who are not or are no longer participating in the hostilities and restricts the means and methods of warfare. International humanitarian law is also known as the law of war or the law of armed conflict.
International humanitarian law is part of international law, which is the body of rules governing relations between States. International law is contained in agreements between States – treaties or conventions –, in customary rules, which consist of State practise considered by them as legally binding, and in general principles.
International humanitarian law applies to armed conflicts. It does not regulate whether a State may actually use force; this is governed by an important, but distinct, part of international law set out in the United Nations Charter.
https://www.icrc.org/en/document/what-international-humanitarian-law
https://www.facebook.com/zin.linn.9/posts/10208644837335021?pnref=story
Republic act no. 9851 official gazette of the republic of the philippinesgemrodflorano
This document is the Republic Act No. 9851, which was signed into law in the Philippines on December 11, 2009. It defines terms related to international humanitarian law, genocide, and other crimes against humanity. It also establishes the jurisdiction of Philippine courts over such crimes and designates special courts to try cases involving these crimes. The Act affirms the Philippines' commitment to international law and human rights, and its rejection of war as an instrument of national policy. It aims to prevent impunity for perpetrators of serious international crimes.
This document summarizes international humanitarian law (IHL), including its sources in customary international law and treaties like the Hague and Geneva Conventions. It describes the key principles of IHL like distinction, proportionality, and military necessity. It discusses the different types of armed conflicts and protected persons under IHL such as civilians, prisoners of war, and the wounded. It also outlines prohibitions on means and methods of warfare and the application of IHL to non-international armed conflicts.
International humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL) both aim to protect individuals in armed conflict and civil unrest. IHL regulates armed conflict by limiting means and methods of warfare and reducing suffering. It protects civilians and those no longer taking part in hostilities. IHRL establishes rules for governments in their treatment of individuals during peacetime and conflict, though some rights can be derogated during emergencies. Both bodies of law place duties on states and non-state actors, and establish international mechanisms to support implementation and enforcement.
International humanitarian law (IHL) has its origins in the 19th century but is based on older principles of mitigating human suffering during armed conflict. IHL is derived from both historical sources like the 1864 Geneva Convention and 1907 Hague Regulations, as well as modern treaties like the 1949 Geneva Conventions and 1977 Additional Protocols. These sources aim to balance military necessity with humanitarian protections for civilians and combatants. IHL also includes customary international law derived from widespread and consistent state practice followed out of a sense of legal obligation.
The document summarizes the key provisions of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols, which established international legal standards for humanitarian treatment during war. The conventions protect wounded and sick soldiers; prisoners of war; civilians in occupied territories; and introduce Common Article 3 applying minimum humanitarian standards to non-international armed conflicts. The conventions mandate humane treatment of all persons no longer participating in hostilities and establish independent oversight of compliance by the International Committee of the Red Cross.
A Critically Analysis of the Doctrine of Use of Force by States under Interna...Onyekachi Duru Esq
The purpose of this presentation is to provide a clear statement, assessment and critical analysis of the rules of international law governing the use of force by states.
Intro to international humanitarian law by icrcTabi Khan
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), also known as the Law of Armed Conflict, regulates armed conflict by limiting means and methods of warfare and limiting suffering. IHL protects civilians and those who are wounded, captured or detained. It originated from ancient customs and was modernized in the 1860s by Henry Dunant, who established the International Committee of the Red Cross and promoted the Geneva Conventions protecting wounded soldiers. The four 1949 Geneva Conventions and two 1977 Additional Protocols apply to international and non-international armed conflicts. IHL principles include distinction, proportionality, unnecessary suffering and military necessity. All parties in conflict, including non-state actors, must respect IHL.
Law of war is that part of international law that regulates the resort to armed forces; the conduct to armed forces and the protection of war victims in both national and international conflict; conflicting occupation; and the relationship between conflict, neutral and non-conflicting states
The document discusses key concepts related to the principle of distinction in international humanitarian law. It defines civilians and combatants, and notes that civilians must be protected from attack while combatants may be legitimate targets. It also discusses rules for distinguishing between combatants and those who are hors de combat (wounded, sick, or detained), and notes that indiscriminate attacks that do not distinguish between military objectives and civilians are prohibited.
International Humanitarian Law Lecture 19 - 70 Years of Geneva ConventionsNilendra Kumar
Geneva Conventions are the main plank of IHL treaty law adopted by India to abide by protection, compliance and adherence norms in armed conflicts
This presentation is a review of past 70 years resume in it's regard.
Charles Ble Goude, a Ivorian politician, was issued an arrest warrant by the ICC for alleged crimes against humanity during post-election violence in Ivory Coast in 2010 that killed 3,000 people. He was arrested in Ghana in 2013 after hiding for 18 months and denying the charges. However, the ICC maintains he should stand trial to defend himself against the serious allegations.
now a days i researching about new means and method of warfare with taking and observing the international experts opinions and analysis, as this world is achieving and inventing more effective and dangerous weapon and way of projectile these new weapon which becoming the serious threat to human life, not just human but these new full of technology weapon and methods are enough to destroy entire world .
The document discusses the principles governing relations between states under international law as established in treaties and conventions. It outlines the key principles of sovereign equality of states, non-intervention in other states' internal affairs, prohibition on the threat or use of force, peaceful settlement of disputes, respect for human rights, and self-determination of peoples as derived from sources like the 1933 Montevideo Convention, 1950 UN Friendly Relations Resolution, and 1966 International Covenants on Civil/Political and Economic/Social/Cultural Rights. The lecturer concludes that states must abide by these principles both as a matter of international legal obligation and to promote cooperation between nations.
The Tlateoloclco Treaty established Latin America and the Caribbean as a nuclear-weapon-free zone. Key points:
- Signed in 1967, it prohibits nuclear weapons in the region and requires countries to only use nuclear material for peaceful purposes.
- It establishes an Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons to ensure compliance through inspections and reports.
- Countries must negotiate safeguards agreements with the IAEA to apply its inspections to their nuclear activities.
- Semi-annual reports are submitted to verify no prohibited nuclear activities have occurred and that peaceful explosions comply with the treaty.
International Humanitarian Law, (Lecture 15)- Distinction between internation...Nilendra Kumar
This presentation explains the nature of an armed conflict and the salient differences between international armed conflict and non international armed conflict while also highlighting its relevance there to.
The document discusses recent developments and challenges in international humanitarian law. It addresses changes in the nature of armed conflicts including their increasing complexity with multiple actors. It examines issues around qualifying situations of violence as international or non-international armed conflicts. It also discusses the development and application of international humanitarian law, including treaty law and challenges around classifying mixed or internationalized armed conflicts.
The document discusses the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC). It defines LOAC as the branch of international law that seeks to limit the effects of armed conflict by protecting non-combatants and restricting means and methods of warfare. LOAC applies to both international and non-international armed conflicts. It aims to protect civilians, prisoners of war, and limit unnecessary suffering. Key LOAC principles are military necessity, distinction between combatants and civilians, and proportionality in attacks. The Geneva Conventions of 1949 are important sources of LOAC rules governing treatment of wounded forces, prisoners of war, and civilians.
International humanitarian law presentationRida Khan
International Humanitarian Law (IHL) regulates the conduct of armed conflicts and seeks to limit human suffering. It originated in the 19th century and is now comprised of the Geneva Conventions and additional protocols that protect civilians, prisoners of war, and others not participating in hostilities. IHL applies in both international and non-international armed conflicts and restricts certain weapons and tactics while providing humanitarian protections and oversight of compliance.
International humanitarian law governs the conduct of armed conflict and seeks to limit its effects. It protects persons who are not or are no longer participating in the hostilities, as well as restricting the means and methods of warfare. The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols of 1977 are the core treaties of international humanitarian law. They protect the wounded, sick, shipwrecked, prisoners of war and civilians, and restrict warfare to discriminate between combatants and civilians. Violations of international humanitarian law that constitute grave breaches are considered war crimes.
INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW ENGLISH-BURMESE VERSIONMYO AUNG Myanmar
What is international humanitarian law?
Legal factsheet31 DECEMBER 2014
Fact sheet providing a summary description of the sources, content and field of application of international humanitarian law.
International humanitarian law is a set of rules which seek, for humanitarian reasons, to limit the effects of armed conflict. It protects persons who are not or are no longer participating in the hostilities and restricts the means and methods of warfare. International humanitarian law is also known as the law of war or the law of armed conflict.
International humanitarian law is part of international law, which is the body of rules governing relations between States. International law is contained in agreements between States – treaties or conventions –, in customary rules, which consist of State practise considered by them as legally binding, and in general principles.
International humanitarian law applies to armed conflicts. It does not regulate whether a State may actually use force; this is governed by an important, but distinct, part of international law set out in the United Nations Charter.
https://www.icrc.org/en/document/what-international-humanitarian-law
https://www.facebook.com/zin.linn.9/posts/10208644837335021?pnref=story
Republic act no. 9851 official gazette of the republic of the philippinesgemrodflorano
This document is the Republic Act No. 9851, which was signed into law in the Philippines on December 11, 2009. It defines terms related to international humanitarian law, genocide, and other crimes against humanity. It also establishes the jurisdiction of Philippine courts over such crimes and designates special courts to try cases involving these crimes. The Act affirms the Philippines' commitment to international law and human rights, and its rejection of war as an instrument of national policy. It aims to prevent impunity for perpetrators of serious international crimes.
This document summarizes international humanitarian law (IHL), including its sources in customary international law and treaties like the Hague and Geneva Conventions. It describes the key principles of IHL like distinction, proportionality, and military necessity. It discusses the different types of armed conflicts and protected persons under IHL such as civilians, prisoners of war, and the wounded. It also outlines prohibitions on means and methods of warfare and the application of IHL to non-international armed conflicts.
International humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL) both aim to protect individuals in armed conflict and civil unrest. IHL regulates armed conflict by limiting means and methods of warfare and reducing suffering. It protects civilians and those no longer taking part in hostilities. IHRL establishes rules for governments in their treatment of individuals during peacetime and conflict, though some rights can be derogated during emergencies. Both bodies of law place duties on states and non-state actors, and establish international mechanisms to support implementation and enforcement.
International humanitarian law (IHL) has its origins in the 19th century but is based on older principles of mitigating human suffering during armed conflict. IHL is derived from both historical sources like the 1864 Geneva Convention and 1907 Hague Regulations, as well as modern treaties like the 1949 Geneva Conventions and 1977 Additional Protocols. These sources aim to balance military necessity with humanitarian protections for civilians and combatants. IHL also includes customary international law derived from widespread and consistent state practice followed out of a sense of legal obligation.
The document summarizes the key provisions of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols, which established international legal standards for humanitarian treatment during war. The conventions protect wounded and sick soldiers; prisoners of war; civilians in occupied territories; and introduce Common Article 3 applying minimum humanitarian standards to non-international armed conflicts. The conventions mandate humane treatment of all persons no longer participating in hostilities and establish independent oversight of compliance by the International Committee of the Red Cross.
A Critically Analysis of the Doctrine of Use of Force by States under Interna...Onyekachi Duru Esq
The purpose of this presentation is to provide a clear statement, assessment and critical analysis of the rules of international law governing the use of force by states.
Intro to international humanitarian law by icrcTabi Khan
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), also known as the Law of Armed Conflict, regulates armed conflict by limiting means and methods of warfare and limiting suffering. IHL protects civilians and those who are wounded, captured or detained. It originated from ancient customs and was modernized in the 1860s by Henry Dunant, who established the International Committee of the Red Cross and promoted the Geneva Conventions protecting wounded soldiers. The four 1949 Geneva Conventions and two 1977 Additional Protocols apply to international and non-international armed conflicts. IHL principles include distinction, proportionality, unnecessary suffering and military necessity. All parties in conflict, including non-state actors, must respect IHL.
Law of war is that part of international law that regulates the resort to armed forces; the conduct to armed forces and the protection of war victims in both national and international conflict; conflicting occupation; and the relationship between conflict, neutral and non-conflicting states
The document discusses key concepts related to the principle of distinction in international humanitarian law. It defines civilians and combatants, and notes that civilians must be protected from attack while combatants may be legitimate targets. It also discusses rules for distinguishing between combatants and those who are hors de combat (wounded, sick, or detained), and notes that indiscriminate attacks that do not distinguish between military objectives and civilians are prohibited.
International Humanitarian Law Lecture 19 - 70 Years of Geneva ConventionsNilendra Kumar
Geneva Conventions are the main plank of IHL treaty law adopted by India to abide by protection, compliance and adherence norms in armed conflicts
This presentation is a review of past 70 years resume in it's regard.
Charles Ble Goude, a Ivorian politician, was issued an arrest warrant by the ICC for alleged crimes against humanity during post-election violence in Ivory Coast in 2010 that killed 3,000 people. He was arrested in Ghana in 2013 after hiding for 18 months and denying the charges. However, the ICC maintains he should stand trial to defend himself against the serious allegations.
now a days i researching about new means and method of warfare with taking and observing the international experts opinions and analysis, as this world is achieving and inventing more effective and dangerous weapon and way of projectile these new weapon which becoming the serious threat to human life, not just human but these new full of technology weapon and methods are enough to destroy entire world .
The document discusses the principles governing relations between states under international law as established in treaties and conventions. It outlines the key principles of sovereign equality of states, non-intervention in other states' internal affairs, prohibition on the threat or use of force, peaceful settlement of disputes, respect for human rights, and self-determination of peoples as derived from sources like the 1933 Montevideo Convention, 1950 UN Friendly Relations Resolution, and 1966 International Covenants on Civil/Political and Economic/Social/Cultural Rights. The lecturer concludes that states must abide by these principles both as a matter of international legal obligation and to promote cooperation between nations.
The Tlateoloclco Treaty established Latin America and the Caribbean as a nuclear-weapon-free zone. Key points:
- Signed in 1967, it prohibits nuclear weapons in the region and requires countries to only use nuclear material for peaceful purposes.
- It establishes an Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons to ensure compliance through inspections and reports.
- Countries must negotiate safeguards agreements with the IAEA to apply its inspections to their nuclear activities.
- Semi-annual reports are submitted to verify no prohibited nuclear activities have occurred and that peaceful explosions comply with the treaty.
A Great Experiment The League of NationsAnıl Sural
The document summarizes the founding and structure of the League of Nations following World War I. It describes how the League was created to maintain peace but gave little real power to member states to enforce its decisions. The League's main organs were the Assembly, Council and Secretariat. The Assembly became the central focus through establishing precedents like annual meetings and reviewing the Council's activities. The League had some successes in resolving small disputes but failed to prevent major conflicts like Italy's invasion of Ethiopia due to lack of cooperation from powerful member states.
The document discusses the origins and purposes of the United Nations. It formed out of declarations between 1941-1943 by allied nations to establish a new international organization to maintain peace and security after World War II. The UN officially began in 1945 with the ratification of the UN Charter, with the goals of maintaining international peace, developing friendly relations between countries, and addressing global issues through cooperation.
United nations diplomacy & dispute settlement.hebaalaag
The UN aims to maintain peace and security through cooperation between states. Its primary organs work to resolve disputes peacefully and facilitate international agreements. If peaceful measures fail, the Security Council can authorize sanctions or military force. Reforms seek to make the UN more representative and effective in restoring peace.
The document is the Charter of the United Nations that was agreed upon in San Francisco in 1945 to establish the UN. It lays out the purposes of the UN which include maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations, achieving international cooperation, and being a center for harmonizing actions to attain common ends. It establishes the main organs of the UN including the General Assembly, Security Council, and others. It provides that membership in the UN is open to peace-loving states that accept the charter's obligations, and allows for suspension or expulsion of member states for violating the charter.
The document is the Charter of the United Nations that was agreed upon in San Francisco in 1945 to establish the UN. It lays out the purposes of the UN which include maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations, achieving international cooperation, and being a center for harmonizing actions to attain common ends. It establishes the main organs of the UN including the General Assembly, Security Council, and others. It provides that membership in the UN is open to peace-loving states that accept the charter's obligations, and allows for suspension or expulsion of member states for violating the charter.
INTER-AMERICAN TREATY OF RECIPROCAL ASSISTANCE (TIAR)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
On September 11, 2019, the USA’s OAS engaged in FRIVOLOUS Meeting in an effort to UNDERMINE the provisions of INTER-AMERICAN TREATY OF RECIPROCAL ASSISTANCE
In the USA’s CONTINUED “FAILED” efforts to INVADE Venezuela and OVERTHROW its Government! This document has been created in support of the N.A.Z.I. Trials and/or N.A.Z.I. War Crimes Commission that the Utica INTERNATIONAL Embassy’s Official(s) are working on to support the INVESTIGATIONS and PROSECUTIONS of the United States of America’s/United States Officials (Heads Of State, Congressional Members, Supreme Court Justices…) Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and their Nazis/Zionists Members, etc. that CONTROL and RUN the United States of America’s DESPOTISM Government Empire under the guise of “United States”…
After the Nuremberg Trials which involved the PROSECUTION of Adolf Hitler and his NAZI Followers, the World VOWED to “NEVER” allow such ATROCITIES… to ever occur again! However, here we are in the 21st Century and Adolf Hitler’s “WORLD ORDER” Agenda is in FULL Implementation under the guise of Nazi/Zionist Members serving as Legal Counsel to the United States THROUGH the Law Firm of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and others DEVOUT Hitler Followers, etc.
The UIE with supporting other Nations-Of-Color look forward to using similar processes (as the UN War Crimes Commission) to Implement the N.A.Z.I. War Crimes Commission as well as the N.A.Z.I. Trials…
This document is the Charter of the United Nations that was agreed upon in San Francisco in 1945 to establish the UN. The key points are:
1) The preamble states the aims of the UN to save future generations from war, promote human rights and justice, and establish conditions for social and economic progress.
2) Chapter 1 outlines the purposes of the UN including maintaining international peace and security through collective action, developing friendly relations, achieving cooperation on economic and social issues, and promoting human rights.
3) The charter establishes the main organs of the UN including the General Assembly, Security Council, and others and outlines basic principles of sovereignty, peaceful dispute resolution, and non-intervention.
The United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 2131, which declares the inadmissibility of intervention in the domestic affairs of States and protects their independence and sovereignty. The resolution affirms the principles of sovereign equality and non-intervention between States, and condemns armed intervention, subversion, and other direct or indirect forms of coercion. It recognizes each State's right to choose its own political, economic, social and cultural systems without outside interference or pressure. The resolution aims to uphold these principles in order to ensure peaceful cooperation between nations and maintain international peace and security.
The document discusses the history and development of international human rights law from the 19th century onwards. It covers early developments around abolishing slavery and the slave trade. It then discusses the Geneva Conventions establishing international humanitarian law. It also covers the League of Nations and protections for minorities after World War 1. Later sections discuss the UN Charter, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and rights protected in the Covenant.
The General Assembly is the main deliberative organ of the UN. It discusses and makes recommendations on issues relating to international peace and security. Each country has one vote in the General Assembly. Key responsibilities of the General Assembly include approving the UN budget, electing non-permanent Security Council members, and initiating studies on international issues.
General assembly topic A, B and committee backgroundGera Morton
The General Assembly is the main deliberative organ of the UN. It discusses and makes recommendations on important issues like peace and security. Decisions require a majority vote, with two-thirds needed on important issues. Each country has one vote, and the General Assembly elects members of other UN bodies and appoints the Secretary-General.
This document provides an overview of the historical development of international organizations aimed at promoting peace, including Kant's vision of perpetual peace in 1795, the Concert of Europe in 1814-15, and the Geneva Convention of 1864. It then discusses the establishment and structure of the League of Nations in 1919-1920 after World War I, its goals of preventing war and collective security, and its ultimate failures. Finally, it outlines the rise of the UN after World War II and its expanded structure and role compared to the League of Nations.
The United Nations Charter was signed in 1945 in San Francisco. It established the UN and its main organs including the General Assembly, Security Council, Economic and Social Council, Trusteeship Council, and International Court of Justice. The Charter outlines the purposes of the UN in maintaining international peace and security. It also establishes principles of sovereign equality among states and peaceful settlement of disputes. Subsequent amendments expanded UN membership on certain organs.
This document is the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties from 1969. Some key points:
- It establishes rules and guidelines governing treaties between states, including how treaties are concluded, entered into force, amended, and terminated.
- It covers topics like what constitutes a treaty, who has authority to negotiate and sign treaties, how states express consent to be bound by treaties through actions like signature, ratification, and accession, and rules around reservations.
- The convention aims to codify international law regarding treaties and promote peaceful cooperation between states, in line with the UN Charter. It has been widely accepted, with over 100 state parties.
This document summarizes international human rights law. It discusses the categorization of human rights into civil/political rights, economic/social/cultural rights, and group rights. It also examines the debate around universalism vs. cultural relativism in human rights. The document then outlines the evolution of international human rights law through instruments like the UN Charter, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and International Covenants. It provides details on key rights in the ICCPR like the right to life, freedom from torture, and right to liberty and security of the person.
A Look at Neutrality Now — and After the Ukraine War.pdfAndrewCheatham7
The document discusses the need to update the concept of neutrality in international law in light of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. It notes that autocrats like Putin have weaponized concepts like neutrality to further their own ends. Specifically, Putin could claim that countries providing military aid to Ukraine have violated neutrality and thus justify expanding the war. However, scholars say neutrality law does not apply here and aiding Ukraine's self-defense is justified. The document argues the international community must clearly define norms for neutral states during war to prevent future exploitation and circumvention of laws. It proposes a conference to formally update the legal framework governing neutrality.
The document is the Brasilia Declaration from the 2005 summit between South American and Arab countries.
[1] The leaders committed to strengthening bi-regional relations and cooperation on issues like sustainable development, human rights, non-proliferation, and conflict resolution.
[2] They also agreed to work together on international peace and security through multilateral frameworks and respect for international law, including seeking a nuclear-weapon free zone in the Middle East and a just peace settlement in Israel-Palestine based on UN resolutions.
The General Assembly is the main deliberative organ of the UN. It can discuss and make recommendations on any issues within its scope. Decisions on important issues require a two-thirds majority, while other decisions are made by simple majority. Each country has one vote, and the General Assembly can initiate studies and actions on political, economic, social and legal issues affecting global peace and security.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
2. The use of Force
The use of force has been a long standing phenomenon in
international relations and has been considered to be
directly linked to the sovereignty of states-the limitless
power wielded by states to use all possible means to guard
and protect their interests.
The United Nations Charter in article 2(4) controls the use of
force by member states.
“All members shall refrain in their international relations from
the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or
political independence of any state, or in any other manner
3. The use of Force – History – Initial Agreements
International law has through customary international laws
provided in the past guidance on how war might be waged and,
to a lesser extent, against whom it might be waged.
These following treaties beginning in the second half of the 19th
century bear example to its development: the 1856 Paris
Declaration on maritime war, 1864 Geneva Convention on
wounded and sick and the St. Petersburg Declaration of 1868
on explosive projectiles.
In 1874, at the instigation of Russia, an international
conference was held in Brussels which adopted an
4. The use of Force – History – League of Nations
It was important as a precursor to the Hague ‘First International
Peace Conference’ of 1899 and the ‘Second International Peace
Conference’ of 1907.
These Conferences, adopted numerous international
instruments codifying (and sometimes adding to) international
law. The 1907 Conference alone adopted 13 conventions and a
declaration, binding on all states.
The Covenant of the League of Nations of 1919 provided a
permanent forum where states could negotiate and discuss
differences rather than resorting to war; and placed limitations
5. The use of Force – History - League of Nations
The League of Nations came into being after the end of World
War One. Its task was simple – to ensure that war never broke
out again.
Member states agreed to submit serious disputes with one or
more other states to arbitration or judicial settlement or inquiry
by the Council of the League.
There was to be no resort to war until three months after the
completion of such a process.
Members also undertook not to go to war with another member
who complied with an arbitral award, a judicial decision or a
6. The use of Force – History - League of Nations
Members agreed to ‘respect and preserve as against external
aggression, the territorial integrity and political independence of
all Members of the League’.
7. The use of Force – History - General treaty for the
renunciation of war, 1928 (The Kellogg-Briand Pact)
Signatory states promised not to use war to resolve "disputes or
conflicts of whatever nature or of whatever origin they may be,
which may arise among them".[
Parties failing to abide by this promise "should be denied of the
benefits furnished by [the] treaty".
It was signed by Germany, France and the United States on 27
August 1928, and by most other nations soon after.
Eleven years later after the Paris signing, World War II had
begun.
8. The use of Force – History - General treaty for the
renunciation of war, 1928 (The Kellogg-Briand Pact)
Article 1 states:
The High Contracting Parties solemnly declare in the names of
their respective peoples that they condemn recourse to war for the
solution of international controversies, and renounce it, as an
instrument of national policy in their relations with one another.
Article 2 provides: The High Contracting Parties agree that the
settlement or solution of all disputes or conflicts of whatever
nature or of whatever origin they may be, which may arise
among them, shall never be sought except by pacific means.
9. The use of Force – History - General treaty for the
renunciation of war, 1928 (The Kellogg-Briand Pact)
It was the first treaty to suggest that recourse to war could be a
breach of international law.
It was used as an important legal base for the prosecution in
Nuremberg of those held responsible for starting the 2nd World
War.
Violated frequently, It remained a Pact without enforcement
provisions and it was violated frequently.
10. The use of Force – Un Charter
The Charter of the United Nations was signed on 26 June
1945, in San Francisco, at the conclusion of the United Nations
Conference on International Organization, and came into force
on 24 October 1945.
The Statute of the International Court of Justice is an integral
part of the Charter.
The United Nations is currently made up of 193 Member
States. The mission and work of the United Nations are guided
by the purposes and principles contained in its founding
Charter.
11. The use of Force – Un Charter
Due to the powers vested in its Charter and its unique
international character, the United Nations can take action on
the issues confronting humanity in the 21st century.
These include peace and security, climate change, sustainable
development, human rights, disarmament, terrorism,
humanitarian and health emergencies, gender equality,
governance, food production, and more.
The UN also provides a forum for its members to express their
views in the General Assembly, the Security Council, the
Economic and Social Council, and other bodies and
12. The use of Force – Un Charter
The main organs of the UN are the General Assembly, the
security council, the economic and social council,
Trusteeship Council, International Court of Justice,
Secretariat,
The opening of the Preamble to the UN Charter states the
determination ‘to save succeeding generations from the scourge
of war’,
Article 1(1) is: To maintain international peace and security, and
to that end: to take effective collective measures for the
prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the
13. The use of Force – Un Charter
and in conformity with the principles of justice and international
law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or
situations which might lead to a breach of the peace.
While Article 2(3) commits UN member states to settle their
international disputes by peaceful means in order to ensure that
international peace and security, and justice, are not
endangered.
Article 2(4) commits members to refrain in their international
relations from the threat or use of force ‘against the territorial
integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other
14. The use of Force – Un Charter
UN charter article 2(4) has been ratified by all the members and
is protected by the United Nations Charter 1945 to prohibit the
use of force by states.
Most scholars have interpreted Article 2(4) to be banning the
use of force as in “territorial integrity or political independence
of states";
The general principle is to ban the use of armed forces except
in cases where; there is collective action-pursued to maintain or
even enforce peace (Articles 24, 25, and Chapter VII)
This appears to be even more elaborated in Resolution 2625 of
15. The use of Force – Un Charter - The 1970 General
Assembly Resolution 2625
"The Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning
Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States" was
adopted by the GA on 24 October 1970, during a
commemorative session to celebrate the twenty-fifth
anniversary of the UN.
"the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples
enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations" embraces the
right of all peoples "freely to determine, without external
interference, their political status and to pursue their economic,
social and cultural development" as well as the duty of every
16. The use of Force – Un Charter - The 1970 General
Assembly Resolution 2625
The resolution identifies the following duties:
Every State has the duty to refrain in its international relations
from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or
political independence of any State, or in any other manner
inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations. Such a
threat or use of force constitutes a violation of international law
and the Charter of the United Nations and shall never be
employed as a means of settling international issues.
17. The use of Force – Un Charter - The 1970 General
Assembly Resolution 2625
1. A war of aggression constitutes a crime against the peace.
2. States have the duty to refrain from propaganda for wars of
aggression.
3. Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force
to violate the existing international boundaries of another State
or as a means of solving international disputes, including
territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.
4. Every State likewise has the duty to refrain from the threat or
use of force to violate international lines of demarcation, such as
armistice lines, established by or pursuant to an international
agreement to which it is a party or which it is otherwise bound to
18. The use of Force – Un Charter - The 1970 General
Assembly Resolution 2625
5. Nothing in the foregoing shall be construed as prejudicing the
positions of the parties concerned with regard to the status and
effects of such lines under their special regimes or as affecting
their temporary character.
6. States have a duty to refrain from acts of reprisal involving the
use of force.
7. Every State has the duty to refrain from any forcible action
which deprives peoples referred to in the elaboration of the
principle of equal rights and self-determination of their right to
self-determination and freedom and independence.
19. The use of Force – Un Charter - The 1970 General
Assembly Resolution 2625
8. Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing or
encouraging the organization of irregular forces or armed
bands, including mercenaries, for incursion into the territory of
another State.
9. Every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating,
assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts in
another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its
territory directed towards the commission of such acts, when
the acts referred to in the present paragraph involve a threat or
20. The use of Force – Un Charter - GA resolution 3314 of 1974
– Resolution on the Definition of Aggression.
‘Aggression is the use of armed force by a state against the
sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of
another state, or in any manner inconsistent with the Charter of
the United Nations.’
First use of armed force against Article 2(4) is deemed to be
prima facie evidence of an act of aggression.
Acts identified as aggression include an invasion or armed
attack; any annexation of territory; bombardment by the armed
forces of a state against the territory of another state;
21. The use of Force – Un Charter - GA resolution 3314 of 1974
– Resolution on the Definition of Aggression.
Acts identified as aggression include an invasion or armed
attack; any annexation of territory; bombardment by the armed
forces of a state against the territory of another state; an attack
by the armed forces of a state on the land, sea or air force,
marine and air fleets of another state; and the sending, by or on
behalf of a state, of armed bands, groups, irregulars or
mercenaries who carry out acts of armed force against another
state ‘of such gravity as to amount to acts defined as
aggression’.
This is the framework provided by the United Nations for the
22. The use of Force
The UN has the role of ensuring international peace and
security.
Both the prohibition on the threat and use of force (Article 2(4))
and the prohibition on intervention in matters within domestic
jurisdiction (Article 2(7)) were intended to do so.
The responsibility to make these provisions effective is on the
Security Council.
The SC will be discussed in detail subsequently.