SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
PEO ADVISOR
                                                                                  RISK MANAGEMENT




                                                                                                                                                           January 2011


Features
Claim Reporting Lag Time: What's the big deal?
Dindi DeAngelo, MPH
Studies show that claims that are reported more than 24hrs from occurrence are 33% more costly! Timely claim reporting is so important that
every insurance carrier measures a company's ability to report claims in a timely manner as part of a company's risk performance scorecard. In-
surance carriers call that metric...Lag Time (the period of time between the date that the claim occurs and the date that the claim is reported to
the insurance carrier).

Not only does timely claims reporting keep costs down, it also:
     allows for both the employer and the insurance carrier to establish a relationships with the injured parties early in the process to assure
     them that the claim is being handled properly verses wondering if they should call an attorney to "help" represent their interests;

     allows the insurance adjusters to rapidly investigate the claim when things are fresh in the injured employee's and witnesses' minds;
     ensures that the injured parties receive their benefits quickly and accurately if the claim is found to be compensable. Faster reporting means
     better care of the injured party, faster resolution of the claim, faster payments to injured and their medical providers, and ultimately, lower
     costs to employers;
Click here to continue reading...
                                                                                                                        Ask the Advisor…
Payroll Inclusions and Exclusions for WC
John C. Keller, CRM ARM CIC AAI                                                                              The latest question we’ve been asked is how to ex-
                                                                                                             plain the need for a form called the ERM-14.
Throughout my work consulting with PEOs and business in all aspects of Workers Com-
pensation, I’m frequently asked a basic question about WC payroll, so I thought I’d elabo-                   Many times if a PEO client has multiple subsidiaries
rate for all. Most of us know that Workers Compensation premium is a function of rates                       and is going to maintain their own WC policy, outside
defined by insurance carriers (and approved by various state insurance departments) and                      the PEO master, the carrier providing the carve out
payroll by classification code. Because this is relatively straight forward, it’s easy to gloss              policy will require an ERM 14.
over “what is considered ‘payroll’ for workers compensation purposes?”
                                                                                                             Here is what it does:
Incorrect payroll has a direct impact on Workers Compensation premium, and it’s critical
                                                                                                                  Reports changes in ownership, mergers, acquisi-
that the correct payroll be used. Under-report payroll and you’ll have a large, nasty audit
                                                                                                                  tions, or consolidations
bill hit you 3 months after the policy expires (100% due in full, by the way); over-report
payroll, and you drag down your cash flow throughout the year, and then have to claw                              Reports ownership percentage across multiple
for your money back at the audit. Even if you “pay as you go” on a monthly reporting                              entities
basis, it is essential payroll is submitted only based on those categories required by your
                                                                                                                  Proves combinability
state.
Below is a comprehensive list of the inclusions and exclusions for “payroll” as defined by                   All entities with more that 50% common ownership
the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI):                                                       are combinable for the purposes of the NCCI Experi-
Inclusions in payroll for Workers Compensation insurance:                                                    ence Modification Rate (EMR). Completing the ERM-
                                                                                                             14 allows the NCCI to combine payroll and claims
     Wages or salaries, including retroactive wages. (Check with your insurance company auditor to have      history for all commonly owned companies in order
     them provide state caps on individual weekly wage)                                                      to generate one EMR for the WC carrier to use in the
     Commissions and draws against commissions                                                               rating of the WC policy premium

     Bonuses including stock bonus plans
                                                                                                             If you have a question you’d like answered, email the editor at:
Click here to continue reading...
                                                                                                             RiskAdvisor@praxiom-rm.com.



                                                          © 2010 P rax iom Risk Management LLC
                                                          Prax iom Risk Management is a Certified Risk Management and Safety P rofessional firm.                01/11
PEO
                                                             RISK MANAGEMENT

                                                       ADVISOR

Benchmarking
The Benchmarking section is used to outline various industries in terms of their Workers Compensation risk factors, historical claims statistics, and
key loss sources. Benchmarking statistics are obtained from a variety of credible sources including the largest WC insurance companies in the U.S.
and The Bureau of Labor and Statistics. The statistics used are aggregated from all states and averaged over a 5 year rolling period. All stats be-
low are from claims incurred between 1/1/05—12/31/09.
Rate Definitions:
Frequency Rate = # non $0 claims / payroll per $1M                    Recordable = # OSHA recordable incidents / 200,000 hours1
Loss Rate = Total Incurred $ / payroll per $100                       DART = incidents w/ Days Away, Restricted duty or job Transfer / 200,000 hours


This month we dive into the white collar professional services of Legal , Architectural, and Accounting Services. In the white collar professional
service industry, you’ll find very low frequency and loss rates and several predictable loss sources.



  SIC Industry 8111—Legal Services
       As of: 10/31/2010                                                                  Average                %                       SIC 8111 - Top 5 Loss Sources % Total Incurred

     Period: 1/1/05 - 12/31/09                                 Loss Sources                 Inc.         % Inc Claims                                       All Other
                                                                                                                                                                              Repeated
                                                                                                                                   Vehicles                   19%
                                                                                                                                                                               Trauma
       Average Incurred     $7,262                          Repeated Trauma              $    8,843      24.5% 20.1%                 6%                                         25%


           Average Paid     $5,375                        Slip/Fall - Same Level         $    8,665      23.1% 19.4%                          Materials
                                                                                                                                              Handling                             Slip/Fall -

     % claims > $10,000      11.8%                         Slip/Fall - Elevated          $    9,580      13.4% 10.2%                           13%             Slip/Fall -
                                                                                                                                                                Elevated
                                                                                                                                                                                   Same Level
                                                                                                                                                                                      23%
                                                                                                                                                                  14%
    % Incurred >$10,000      90.6%                         Materials Handling            $    6,446      13.2% 14.9%
      % claims >$25,000       6.9%                               Vehicles                $ 15,388         6.3%    3.0%
    % Incurred >$25,000      79.7%                               All Other                               19.4% 32.4%
                                                                  NAIC        541100
               Key Metrics                                     BLS Stat         2005        2006        2007        2008         2009
          Frequency Rate                   0.07             Recordable            0.7         0.6         0.6         0.6         0.6
               Loss Rate                  $0.03                  DART             0.2         0.2         0.3         0.3         0.3




  SIC Industry 8712—Architectural Services

      As of: 10/31/2010                                                                 Average                   %                               SIC 8712 - Top 5 Loss Sources % Total Incurred
    Period: 1/1/05 - 12/31/09                                   Loss Sources              Inc.            % Inc Claims                                     All Other
                                                                                                                              Struck By/Against
                                                                                                                                                             16%
       Average Incurred       $2,951                       Slip/Fall - Same Level     $     4,613         29.7% 19.0%                9%                                          Slip/Fall -
                                                                                                                                                                                Same Level
                                                                                                                                                                                    30%
           Average Paid       $2,875                        Materials Handling        $     4,958         19.4% 11.6%
                                                                                                                               Slip/Fall -
     % claims > $10,000         5.1%                              Vehicles            $     5,983         15.0%    7.4%        Elevated
                                                                                                                                                                             Materials
                                                                                                                                  10%                     Vehicles           Handling
    % Incurred >$10,000        83.0%                        Slip/Fall - Elevated      $ 10,688            10.0%    2.8%                                     15%                20%

      % claims >$25,000         3.7%                         Struck By/Against        $     4,291          9.4%    6.5%
    % Incurred >$25,000        75.2%                              All Other                               16.4% 52.8%
                                                                     NAIC 541310
                Key Metrics                                      BLS Stat       2005       2006           2007        2008             2009
            Frequency Rate                 0.21              Recordable           0.6        0.7            0.3         0.5             0.4
                 Loss Rate                $0.40                     DART          0.3        0.3            0.1         0.2             0.2



1—200,000 hours represents the amount of time worked by 100 WSE in one year

                                                          © 2010 P rax iom Risk Management LLC
                                                          Prax iom Risk Management is a Certified Risk Management and Safety P rofessional firm.                                         01/11
PEO
                                                         RISK MANAGEMENT

                                                   ADVISOR

Benchmarking cont...
Rate Definitions:
Frequency Rate = # non $0 claims / payroll per $1M                Recordable = # OSHA recordable incidents / 200,000 hours1
Loss Rate = Total Incurred $ / payroll per $100                   DART = incidents w/ Days Away, Restricted duty or job Transfer / 200,000 hours



  SIC Industry 8721—Accounting Services

    As of: 10/31/2010                                                           Average         %
                                                                                                            SIC 8721 - Top 5 Loss Sources % Total Incurred
   Period: 1/1/05 - 12/31/09                                Loss Sources          Inc.  % Inc Claims
                                                                                                                             All Other Slip/Fall - Same
      Average Incurred       $8,985                    Slip/Fall - Same Level $ 10,871 22.7% 18.7% Caught                      25%          Level
                                                                                                      In/Between                             23%
          Average Paid       $7,044                      Struck By/Against $ 7,429 18.3% 22.1%            5%
                                                                                                                                                       Struck
    % claims > $10,000        10.3%                     Materials Handling $ 11,600 16.4% 12.7%                                                      By/Against
                                                                                                                 Slip/Fall -
                                                                                                                                                        18%
   % Incurred >$10,000        92.0%                     Slip/Fall - Elevated $ 17,544 13.4%      6.9%            Elevated
                                                                                                                    13%
     % claims >$25,000         6.6%                     Caught In/Between $ 10,676 4.6%          3.9%
                                                                                                                                                             Materials
   % Incurred >$25,000        85.4%                           All Other                 24.7% 35.8%                                                          Handling
                                                                                                                                                               16%
                                                               NAIC 541200
              Key Metrics                                   BLS Stat      2005    2006 2007 2008      2009
         Frequency Rate               0.20              Recordable          0.9     0.8   0.8    0.8      0.8
              Loss Rate              $0.37                    DART          0.4     0.3   0.3    0.2      0.2




                           We want your input.
                           We’re looking for PEO Executives and Risk Managers to advise us by providing feedback in our latest poll. Results posted next months

                                                What is the most important concern for a PEO's Risk Management program in 2011?

                                                      Maximizing Profit of the WC Program?

                                                      Obtaining "A" Rated WC Coverage?

                                                      Reducing Pre-Accident Claim Frequency?

                                                      Reducing Post-Accident Claim Cost?

                                                      Administering Multiple Client Policies
                                                   Please click here to select your answer and leave a comment. Poll is hosted in LinkedIn.




                           If you haven’t already joined, there is now a group on LinkedIn dedicated to PEO Risk
                           Management. All PEO Executives and Risk Managers are encouraged to join and
                           participate in the online discussions. Or, you can simply follow along with the news posts that relate to PEO,
                           Risk Management, and Workers Compensation.

                                                   Click here to go to the PEO Risk Management group on LinkedIn and join.




                                                      © 2010 P rax iom Risk Management LLC
                                                      Prax iom Risk Management is a Certified Risk Management and Safety P rofessional firm.                      01/11
PEO
                                                    RISK MANAGEMENT

                                               ADVISOR

Measuring PEO Performance                                                                                        PEO Risk Management best practices are
                                                                                                                 split into 5 primary categories. This
Our Measuring PEO Performance section is dedicated to those                                                      month we outline the second of the five:
PEOs that manage their Workers Compensation program through a
Large Deductible or captive arrangement, and utilize positive re-               Client Service Contracts
sults as a profit center. Each month we highlight different per-
                                                                                There are 6 core elements to a client service agreement (CSA) which
formance metrics that should be used in measuring WC perform-
                                                                                should be incorporated for all PEO clients:
ance.
                                                                                Drug-Free Workplace (DFW) – the CSA should require the Client to
Frequency Rate
                                                                                cooperate with the PEO’s requirements in establishing and imple-
Frequency rate is a critical measure of the amount of claims either             menting a drug-free workplace policy. Here is a link to a nice guide
the PEO or individual PEO clients experience. It is usually put in a            for establishing a DFW that was created by the State of Florida Divi-
standard rate basis (either payroll or hours worked) so that com-               sion of Workers’ Compensation. Other states may have their own
parisons can be made between firms of all sizes.                                guides and requirements, so just use this as an example.

The two most common frequency rates are:                                        Effective Employment Date – the CSA should provide a procedure for
                                                                                establishing the beginning date of employment for existing employ-
# Non-$0 claims / payroll per $1M
                                                                                ees and also delineate when all future hires are deemed to be co-
# OSHA recordable incidents / 200,000 hours1                                    employees of the PEO.

                                                                                Termination – the provision must give the PEO the right to terminate
                                                                                a client for:

Workers Compensation Highlights                                                       Failure to pay PEO for services

                                                                                      Failure to properly report all time worked and wages of employ-
Florida WC rates increasing in 2011
                                                                                      ees
Florida is a hotbed for domiciled PEOs and as an operating
state for other PEOs. We know that it’s critical to have the                          Failure to disclose key information regarding the nature of work
most up to date WC rates in the pricing of PEO services, so                           duties, business operations and locations of workers
here is a short article outlining the changes effective 1/1/11 in                     Changes in business operations, financial conditions, or work-
the state of FL….
                                                                                      force that materially change the cost or risk of providing the
                                                                                      promised services

Since Florida is one of only a few workers                                            Non-compliance with the terms of the CSA or workplace policies
compensation administered pricing states in                                           related to employment practices , safety and
the nation, rate changes approved by the Of-                                          return-to-work, or timely injury reporting
fice of Insurance Regulation (OIR) have an
immediate impact on the majority of busi-                                       Notice of Termination – the CSA should include a
nesses operating in the state. Rate changes are effective                       statement that in the event of client termination, the
January 1st of every year in Florida, and every year since the                  PEO shall provide all employees with immediate writ-
legislative reform in 2003, Florida has seen nothing but de-                    ten notice of termination.
creases.
                                                                                Client Cooperation and Compliance – the CSA should have a require-
Click here to continue reading…                                                 ment that the Client cooperate with the PEO in implementing and
                                                                                enforcing safety and risk management policies and require client’s
Click here for a PDF of the new 2011 FL rates by code...
                                                                                compliance with applicable state and federal regulations.

                                                                                Records and Worksite Inspection – The CSA must provide the PEO
                                                                                and its workers’ compensation carrier the right to inspect the clients
                                                                                records and worksite


                                                  © 2010 P rax iom Risk Management LLC
                                                  Prax iom Risk Management is a Certified Risk Management and Safety P rofessional firm.         01/11
PEO
                   RISK MANAGEMENT

              ADVISOR



 With PEO Risk Management professionals averaging 20 years of experience
 and encompassing a broad range of industry expertise, Praxiom Risk Manage-
 ment is committed to providing a wide range of resources to help PEOs miti-
 gate risk and grow their Workers Compensation profit center.


 The PEO RM Advisor is a monthly e-newsletter designed to keep PEO execu-
 tives and Risk Management professionals informed of relevant topics in the
 area of PEO risk management. Sharing information and best practice through
 e-newsletters is one of the many ways we help support PEO organizations'
 risk management efforts.


 If you would like to contribute industry specific content or articles for publica-
 tion in the areas below, you may submit them to the Editor at:
                          RiskAdvisor@praxiom-rm.com.


                                        Loss Control
                                   Claims Management
                                  Performance Metrics
                                RM Information Systems
                                  Policy Administration
                                  Carrier Relationships
                                  Industry Certifications




           Up Next…
           We’ll continue with our performance benchmarking of professional
           service companies with a look into the WC results of:

                                  Engineering Firms—8711

                            Skilled Nursing Care Facilities—8051




                 © 2010 P rax iom Risk Management LLC
                 Prax iom Risk Management is a Certified Risk Management and Safety P rofessional firm.   01/11

More Related Content

What's hot

Directors and Officers Insurance Basics
Directors and Officers Insurance BasicsDirectors and Officers Insurance Basics
Directors and Officers Insurance BasicsDouglas Y. Park
 
Life insurance company and management
Life insurance company and managementLife insurance company and management
Life insurance company and managementMd. Mufidur Rahman
 
Presentation lol&pa jkrmibl (2)
Presentation lol&pa jkrmibl (2)Presentation lol&pa jkrmibl (2)
Presentation lol&pa jkrmibl (2)SUNIL KUMAR CFP CM
 
erie insurance group 2007-annual-report
erie insurance group 2007-annual-reporterie insurance group 2007-annual-report
erie insurance group 2007-annual-reportfinance49
 
FiNsure 360 Insurance For Start Up Investment Advisors/Financial Institutions
FiNsure 360 Insurance For Start Up Investment Advisors/Financial InstitutionsFiNsure 360 Insurance For Start Up Investment Advisors/Financial Institutions
FiNsure 360 Insurance For Start Up Investment Advisors/Financial Institutionsldag32
 
Aviva's Road to Reform - reducing motor premiums by reforming the personal in...
Aviva's Road to Reform - reducing motor premiums by reforming the personal in...Aviva's Road to Reform - reducing motor premiums by reforming the personal in...
Aviva's Road to Reform - reducing motor premiums by reforming the personal in...Aviva plc
 
Aviva's Road to Reform infographic
Aviva's Road to Reform infographicAviva's Road to Reform infographic
Aviva's Road to Reform infographicAviva plc
 
Professional Indemnity Workshop
Professional Indemnity WorkshopProfessional Indemnity Workshop
Professional Indemnity WorkshopRam Garg
 
Fitch Ratings - Guide
Fitch Ratings - GuideFitch Ratings - Guide
Fitch Ratings - GuideAlyson Davis
 
3) Principles and Practice of Reinsurance
3) Principles and Practice of Reinsurance3) Principles and Practice of Reinsurance
3) Principles and Practice of ReinsuranceKity Cullen
 
USI Retail Wholesale Distribution Program
USI Retail Wholesale Distribution ProgramUSI Retail Wholesale Distribution Program
USI Retail Wholesale Distribution ProgramLeedsunited40
 
Starting A Business
Starting A BusinessStarting A Business
Starting A Businesstdspc
 
Risks-of-Diminishing-Limit-Policies-94-11
Risks-of-Diminishing-Limit-Policies-94-11Risks-of-Diminishing-Limit-Policies-94-11
Risks-of-Diminishing-Limit-Policies-94-11Frederick Fisher, J.D.
 
Directors and Officer's Liability Insurance
Directors and Officer's Liability InsuranceDirectors and Officer's Liability Insurance
Directors and Officer's Liability InsuranceMeri Planning
 

What's hot (20)

Directors and Officers Insurance Basics
Directors and Officers Insurance BasicsDirectors and Officers Insurance Basics
Directors and Officers Insurance Basics
 
Life insurance company and management
Life insurance company and managementLife insurance company and management
Life insurance company and management
 
Presentation lol&pa jkrmibl (2)
Presentation lol&pa jkrmibl (2)Presentation lol&pa jkrmibl (2)
Presentation lol&pa jkrmibl (2)
 
Captive Review 2011
Captive Review 2011Captive Review 2011
Captive Review 2011
 
erie insurance group 2007-annual-report
erie insurance group 2007-annual-reporterie insurance group 2007-annual-report
erie insurance group 2007-annual-report
 
FiNsure 360 Insurance For Start Up Investment Advisors/Financial Institutions
FiNsure 360 Insurance For Start Up Investment Advisors/Financial InstitutionsFiNsure 360 Insurance For Start Up Investment Advisors/Financial Institutions
FiNsure 360 Insurance For Start Up Investment Advisors/Financial Institutions
 
Insurance 201
Insurance 201Insurance 201
Insurance 201
 
CIT_ProfitCenterArticleforVCIA
CIT_ProfitCenterArticleforVCIACIT_ProfitCenterArticleforVCIA
CIT_ProfitCenterArticleforVCIA
 
Aviva's Road to Reform - reducing motor premiums by reforming the personal in...
Aviva's Road to Reform - reducing motor premiums by reforming the personal in...Aviva's Road to Reform - reducing motor premiums by reforming the personal in...
Aviva's Road to Reform - reducing motor premiums by reforming the personal in...
 
Aviva's Road to Reform infographic
Aviva's Road to Reform infographicAviva's Road to Reform infographic
Aviva's Road to Reform infographic
 
1 Part I(7)
1 Part I(7)1 Part I(7)
1 Part I(7)
 
Professional Indemnity Workshop
Professional Indemnity WorkshopProfessional Indemnity Workshop
Professional Indemnity Workshop
 
Fitch Ratings - Guide
Fitch Ratings - GuideFitch Ratings - Guide
Fitch Ratings - Guide
 
3) Principles and Practice of Reinsurance
3) Principles and Practice of Reinsurance3) Principles and Practice of Reinsurance
3) Principles and Practice of Reinsurance
 
Chapter 9 financing risk
Chapter 9 financing riskChapter 9 financing risk
Chapter 9 financing risk
 
USI Retail Wholesale Distribution Program
USI Retail Wholesale Distribution ProgramUSI Retail Wholesale Distribution Program
USI Retail Wholesale Distribution Program
 
4A's Production Wrap-Up Program
4A's Production Wrap-Up Program 4A's Production Wrap-Up Program
4A's Production Wrap-Up Program
 
Starting A Business
Starting A BusinessStarting A Business
Starting A Business
 
Risks-of-Diminishing-Limit-Policies-94-11
Risks-of-Diminishing-Limit-Policies-94-11Risks-of-Diminishing-Limit-Policies-94-11
Risks-of-Diminishing-Limit-Policies-94-11
 
Directors and Officer's Liability Insurance
Directors and Officer's Liability InsuranceDirectors and Officer's Liability Insurance
Directors and Officer's Liability Insurance
 

Similar to Peo advisor 11.01

The article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark .docx
The article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark .docxThe article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark .docx
The article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark .docxmattinsonjanel
 
The Experience Mod
The Experience ModThe Experience Mod
The Experience Modjmlinkster
 
2007 CPM West Keynote Presentation
2007 CPM West Keynote Presentation2007 CPM West Keynote Presentation
2007 CPM West Keynote Presentationsirjem
 
The Case This case was developed by the MIT Sloan School o.docx
The Case This case was developed by the MIT Sloan School o.docxThe Case This case was developed by the MIT Sloan School o.docx
The Case This case was developed by the MIT Sloan School o.docxmehek4
 
The Importance Of Corporate Finance For An Entrepreneur
The Importance Of Corporate Finance For An EntrepreneurThe Importance Of Corporate Finance For An Entrepreneur
The Importance Of Corporate Finance For An EntrepreneurKristen Wilson
 
Prequalification Presentation for the Small Business Boot Camp
Prequalification Presentation for the Small Business Boot CampPrequalification Presentation for the Small Business Boot Camp
Prequalification Presentation for the Small Business Boot Campcimone
 
Your Experience Modification Factor
Your Experience Modification FactorYour Experience Modification Factor
Your Experience Modification FactorPSA_Insurance
 
Contractor Prequalification Presentation
Contractor Prequalification PresentationContractor Prequalification Presentation
Contractor Prequalification Presentationcimone
 
Understanding & Managing Your Workers' Compensation Experience Modification F...
Understanding & Managing Your Workers' Compensation Experience Modification F...Understanding & Managing Your Workers' Compensation Experience Modification F...
Understanding & Managing Your Workers' Compensation Experience Modification F...DeanDCamera
 
The True Cost of Downtime and the Business Case for Continuity
The True Cost of Downtime and the Business Case for ContinuityThe True Cost of Downtime and the Business Case for Continuity
The True Cost of Downtime and the Business Case for ContinuityContinuity Co., LLC
 
Certus Introduction to Self Funding
Certus Introduction to Self FundingCertus Introduction to Self Funding
Certus Introduction to Self FundingJacob Lewis
 
Mirkin. J (2011). Motivation of New Zealand Lawyers, Jonny Mirkin
Mirkin. J (2011). Motivation of New Zealand Lawyers, Jonny MirkinMirkin. J (2011). Motivation of New Zealand Lawyers, Jonny Mirkin
Mirkin. J (2011). Motivation of New Zealand Lawyers, Jonny Mirkinjonnyfromnz
 
Marsh Analytics - CFO com
Marsh Analytics - CFO comMarsh Analytics - CFO com
Marsh Analytics - CFO comPeter Gold
 
After twelve (12) years, your business is wildly successful with m.docx
After twelve (12) years, your business is wildly successful with m.docxAfter twelve (12) years, your business is wildly successful with m.docx
After twelve (12) years, your business is wildly successful with m.docxgalerussel59292
 
Sinclair Winter 2017 Newsletter RI.PDF
Sinclair Winter 2017 Newsletter RI.PDFSinclair Winter 2017 Newsletter RI.PDF
Sinclair Winter 2017 Newsletter RI.PDFJonathan Belek
 
2 q 17-investor-presentation-for-intellisight-conference
2 q 17-investor-presentation-for-intellisight-conference2 q 17-investor-presentation-for-intellisight-conference
2 q 17-investor-presentation-for-intellisight-conferenceemciinsurancegroup
 

Similar to Peo advisor 11.01 (20)

PEO Risk Management Advisor - July 2011
PEO Risk Management Advisor - July 2011PEO Risk Management Advisor - July 2011
PEO Risk Management Advisor - July 2011
 
The article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark .docx
The article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark .docxThe article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark .docx
The article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark .docx
 
IRMI Captive Insurance Issues and Trends 2017
IRMI Captive Insurance Issues and Trends 2017IRMI Captive Insurance Issues and Trends 2017
IRMI Captive Insurance Issues and Trends 2017
 
The Experience Mod
The Experience ModThe Experience Mod
The Experience Mod
 
2007 CPM West Keynote Presentation
2007 CPM West Keynote Presentation2007 CPM West Keynote Presentation
2007 CPM West Keynote Presentation
 
Florida marketplace
Florida marketplaceFlorida marketplace
Florida marketplace
 
PEO Risk Management Advisor - August 2011
PEO Risk Management Advisor - August 2011PEO Risk Management Advisor - August 2011
PEO Risk Management Advisor - August 2011
 
The Case This case was developed by the MIT Sloan School o.docx
The Case This case was developed by the MIT Sloan School o.docxThe Case This case was developed by the MIT Sloan School o.docx
The Case This case was developed by the MIT Sloan School o.docx
 
The Importance Of Corporate Finance For An Entrepreneur
The Importance Of Corporate Finance For An EntrepreneurThe Importance Of Corporate Finance For An Entrepreneur
The Importance Of Corporate Finance For An Entrepreneur
 
Prequalification Presentation for the Small Business Boot Camp
Prequalification Presentation for the Small Business Boot CampPrequalification Presentation for the Small Business Boot Camp
Prequalification Presentation for the Small Business Boot Camp
 
Your Experience Modification Factor
Your Experience Modification FactorYour Experience Modification Factor
Your Experience Modification Factor
 
Contractor Prequalification Presentation
Contractor Prequalification PresentationContractor Prequalification Presentation
Contractor Prequalification Presentation
 
Understanding & Managing Your Workers' Compensation Experience Modification F...
Understanding & Managing Your Workers' Compensation Experience Modification F...Understanding & Managing Your Workers' Compensation Experience Modification F...
Understanding & Managing Your Workers' Compensation Experience Modification F...
 
The True Cost of Downtime and the Business Case for Continuity
The True Cost of Downtime and the Business Case for ContinuityThe True Cost of Downtime and the Business Case for Continuity
The True Cost of Downtime and the Business Case for Continuity
 
Certus Introduction to Self Funding
Certus Introduction to Self FundingCertus Introduction to Self Funding
Certus Introduction to Self Funding
 
Mirkin. J (2011). Motivation of New Zealand Lawyers, Jonny Mirkin
Mirkin. J (2011). Motivation of New Zealand Lawyers, Jonny MirkinMirkin. J (2011). Motivation of New Zealand Lawyers, Jonny Mirkin
Mirkin. J (2011). Motivation of New Zealand Lawyers, Jonny Mirkin
 
Marsh Analytics - CFO com
Marsh Analytics - CFO comMarsh Analytics - CFO com
Marsh Analytics - CFO com
 
After twelve (12) years, your business is wildly successful with m.docx
After twelve (12) years, your business is wildly successful with m.docxAfter twelve (12) years, your business is wildly successful with m.docx
After twelve (12) years, your business is wildly successful with m.docx
 
Sinclair Winter 2017 Newsletter RI.PDF
Sinclair Winter 2017 Newsletter RI.PDFSinclair Winter 2017 Newsletter RI.PDF
Sinclair Winter 2017 Newsletter RI.PDF
 
2 q 17-investor-presentation-for-intellisight-conference
2 q 17-investor-presentation-for-intellisight-conference2 q 17-investor-presentation-for-intellisight-conference
2 q 17-investor-presentation-for-intellisight-conference
 

Peo advisor 11.01

  • 1. PEO ADVISOR RISK MANAGEMENT January 2011 Features Claim Reporting Lag Time: What's the big deal? Dindi DeAngelo, MPH Studies show that claims that are reported more than 24hrs from occurrence are 33% more costly! Timely claim reporting is so important that every insurance carrier measures a company's ability to report claims in a timely manner as part of a company's risk performance scorecard. In- surance carriers call that metric...Lag Time (the period of time between the date that the claim occurs and the date that the claim is reported to the insurance carrier). Not only does timely claims reporting keep costs down, it also: allows for both the employer and the insurance carrier to establish a relationships with the injured parties early in the process to assure them that the claim is being handled properly verses wondering if they should call an attorney to "help" represent their interests; allows the insurance adjusters to rapidly investigate the claim when things are fresh in the injured employee's and witnesses' minds; ensures that the injured parties receive their benefits quickly and accurately if the claim is found to be compensable. Faster reporting means better care of the injured party, faster resolution of the claim, faster payments to injured and their medical providers, and ultimately, lower costs to employers; Click here to continue reading... Ask the Advisor… Payroll Inclusions and Exclusions for WC John C. Keller, CRM ARM CIC AAI The latest question we’ve been asked is how to ex- plain the need for a form called the ERM-14. Throughout my work consulting with PEOs and business in all aspects of Workers Com- pensation, I’m frequently asked a basic question about WC payroll, so I thought I’d elabo- Many times if a PEO client has multiple subsidiaries rate for all. Most of us know that Workers Compensation premium is a function of rates and is going to maintain their own WC policy, outside defined by insurance carriers (and approved by various state insurance departments) and the PEO master, the carrier providing the carve out payroll by classification code. Because this is relatively straight forward, it’s easy to gloss policy will require an ERM 14. over “what is considered ‘payroll’ for workers compensation purposes?” Here is what it does: Incorrect payroll has a direct impact on Workers Compensation premium, and it’s critical Reports changes in ownership, mergers, acquisi- that the correct payroll be used. Under-report payroll and you’ll have a large, nasty audit tions, or consolidations bill hit you 3 months after the policy expires (100% due in full, by the way); over-report payroll, and you drag down your cash flow throughout the year, and then have to claw Reports ownership percentage across multiple for your money back at the audit. Even if you “pay as you go” on a monthly reporting entities basis, it is essential payroll is submitted only based on those categories required by your Proves combinability state. Below is a comprehensive list of the inclusions and exclusions for “payroll” as defined by All entities with more that 50% common ownership the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI): are combinable for the purposes of the NCCI Experi- Inclusions in payroll for Workers Compensation insurance: ence Modification Rate (EMR). Completing the ERM- 14 allows the NCCI to combine payroll and claims Wages or salaries, including retroactive wages. (Check with your insurance company auditor to have history for all commonly owned companies in order them provide state caps on individual weekly wage) to generate one EMR for the WC carrier to use in the Commissions and draws against commissions rating of the WC policy premium Bonuses including stock bonus plans If you have a question you’d like answered, email the editor at: Click here to continue reading... RiskAdvisor@praxiom-rm.com. © 2010 P rax iom Risk Management LLC Prax iom Risk Management is a Certified Risk Management and Safety P rofessional firm. 01/11
  • 2. PEO RISK MANAGEMENT ADVISOR Benchmarking The Benchmarking section is used to outline various industries in terms of their Workers Compensation risk factors, historical claims statistics, and key loss sources. Benchmarking statistics are obtained from a variety of credible sources including the largest WC insurance companies in the U.S. and The Bureau of Labor and Statistics. The statistics used are aggregated from all states and averaged over a 5 year rolling period. All stats be- low are from claims incurred between 1/1/05—12/31/09. Rate Definitions: Frequency Rate = # non $0 claims / payroll per $1M Recordable = # OSHA recordable incidents / 200,000 hours1 Loss Rate = Total Incurred $ / payroll per $100 DART = incidents w/ Days Away, Restricted duty or job Transfer / 200,000 hours This month we dive into the white collar professional services of Legal , Architectural, and Accounting Services. In the white collar professional service industry, you’ll find very low frequency and loss rates and several predictable loss sources. SIC Industry 8111—Legal Services As of: 10/31/2010 Average % SIC 8111 - Top 5 Loss Sources % Total Incurred Period: 1/1/05 - 12/31/09 Loss Sources Inc. % Inc Claims All Other Repeated Vehicles 19% Trauma Average Incurred $7,262 Repeated Trauma $ 8,843 24.5% 20.1% 6% 25% Average Paid $5,375 Slip/Fall - Same Level $ 8,665 23.1% 19.4% Materials Handling Slip/Fall - % claims > $10,000 11.8% Slip/Fall - Elevated $ 9,580 13.4% 10.2% 13% Slip/Fall - Elevated Same Level 23% 14% % Incurred >$10,000 90.6% Materials Handling $ 6,446 13.2% 14.9% % claims >$25,000 6.9% Vehicles $ 15,388 6.3% 3.0% % Incurred >$25,000 79.7% All Other 19.4% 32.4% NAIC 541100 Key Metrics BLS Stat 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Frequency Rate 0.07 Recordable 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Loss Rate $0.03 DART 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 SIC Industry 8712—Architectural Services As of: 10/31/2010 Average % SIC 8712 - Top 5 Loss Sources % Total Incurred Period: 1/1/05 - 12/31/09 Loss Sources Inc. % Inc Claims All Other Struck By/Against 16% Average Incurred $2,951 Slip/Fall - Same Level $ 4,613 29.7% 19.0% 9% Slip/Fall - Same Level 30% Average Paid $2,875 Materials Handling $ 4,958 19.4% 11.6% Slip/Fall - % claims > $10,000 5.1% Vehicles $ 5,983 15.0% 7.4% Elevated Materials 10% Vehicles Handling % Incurred >$10,000 83.0% Slip/Fall - Elevated $ 10,688 10.0% 2.8% 15% 20% % claims >$25,000 3.7% Struck By/Against $ 4,291 9.4% 6.5% % Incurred >$25,000 75.2% All Other 16.4% 52.8% NAIC 541310 Key Metrics BLS Stat 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Frequency Rate 0.21 Recordable 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.4 Loss Rate $0.40 DART 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 1—200,000 hours represents the amount of time worked by 100 WSE in one year © 2010 P rax iom Risk Management LLC Prax iom Risk Management is a Certified Risk Management and Safety P rofessional firm. 01/11
  • 3. PEO RISK MANAGEMENT ADVISOR Benchmarking cont... Rate Definitions: Frequency Rate = # non $0 claims / payroll per $1M Recordable = # OSHA recordable incidents / 200,000 hours1 Loss Rate = Total Incurred $ / payroll per $100 DART = incidents w/ Days Away, Restricted duty or job Transfer / 200,000 hours SIC Industry 8721—Accounting Services As of: 10/31/2010 Average % SIC 8721 - Top 5 Loss Sources % Total Incurred Period: 1/1/05 - 12/31/09 Loss Sources Inc. % Inc Claims All Other Slip/Fall - Same Average Incurred $8,985 Slip/Fall - Same Level $ 10,871 22.7% 18.7% Caught 25% Level In/Between 23% Average Paid $7,044 Struck By/Against $ 7,429 18.3% 22.1% 5% Struck % claims > $10,000 10.3% Materials Handling $ 11,600 16.4% 12.7% By/Against Slip/Fall - 18% % Incurred >$10,000 92.0% Slip/Fall - Elevated $ 17,544 13.4% 6.9% Elevated 13% % claims >$25,000 6.6% Caught In/Between $ 10,676 4.6% 3.9% Materials % Incurred >$25,000 85.4% All Other 24.7% 35.8% Handling 16% NAIC 541200 Key Metrics BLS Stat 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Frequency Rate 0.20 Recordable 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Loss Rate $0.37 DART 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 We want your input. We’re looking for PEO Executives and Risk Managers to advise us by providing feedback in our latest poll. Results posted next months What is the most important concern for a PEO's Risk Management program in 2011? Maximizing Profit of the WC Program? Obtaining "A" Rated WC Coverage? Reducing Pre-Accident Claim Frequency? Reducing Post-Accident Claim Cost? Administering Multiple Client Policies Please click here to select your answer and leave a comment. Poll is hosted in LinkedIn. If you haven’t already joined, there is now a group on LinkedIn dedicated to PEO Risk Management. All PEO Executives and Risk Managers are encouraged to join and participate in the online discussions. Or, you can simply follow along with the news posts that relate to PEO, Risk Management, and Workers Compensation. Click here to go to the PEO Risk Management group on LinkedIn and join. © 2010 P rax iom Risk Management LLC Prax iom Risk Management is a Certified Risk Management and Safety P rofessional firm. 01/11
  • 4. PEO RISK MANAGEMENT ADVISOR Measuring PEO Performance PEO Risk Management best practices are split into 5 primary categories. This Our Measuring PEO Performance section is dedicated to those month we outline the second of the five: PEOs that manage their Workers Compensation program through a Large Deductible or captive arrangement, and utilize positive re- Client Service Contracts sults as a profit center. Each month we highlight different per- There are 6 core elements to a client service agreement (CSA) which formance metrics that should be used in measuring WC perform- should be incorporated for all PEO clients: ance. Drug-Free Workplace (DFW) – the CSA should require the Client to Frequency Rate cooperate with the PEO’s requirements in establishing and imple- Frequency rate is a critical measure of the amount of claims either menting a drug-free workplace policy. Here is a link to a nice guide the PEO or individual PEO clients experience. It is usually put in a for establishing a DFW that was created by the State of Florida Divi- standard rate basis (either payroll or hours worked) so that com- sion of Workers’ Compensation. Other states may have their own parisons can be made between firms of all sizes. guides and requirements, so just use this as an example. The two most common frequency rates are: Effective Employment Date – the CSA should provide a procedure for establishing the beginning date of employment for existing employ- # Non-$0 claims / payroll per $1M ees and also delineate when all future hires are deemed to be co- # OSHA recordable incidents / 200,000 hours1 employees of the PEO. Termination – the provision must give the PEO the right to terminate a client for: Workers Compensation Highlights Failure to pay PEO for services Failure to properly report all time worked and wages of employ- Florida WC rates increasing in 2011 ees Florida is a hotbed for domiciled PEOs and as an operating state for other PEOs. We know that it’s critical to have the Failure to disclose key information regarding the nature of work most up to date WC rates in the pricing of PEO services, so duties, business operations and locations of workers here is a short article outlining the changes effective 1/1/11 in Changes in business operations, financial conditions, or work- the state of FL…. force that materially change the cost or risk of providing the promised services Since Florida is one of only a few workers Non-compliance with the terms of the CSA or workplace policies compensation administered pricing states in related to employment practices , safety and the nation, rate changes approved by the Of- return-to-work, or timely injury reporting fice of Insurance Regulation (OIR) have an immediate impact on the majority of busi- Notice of Termination – the CSA should include a nesses operating in the state. Rate changes are effective statement that in the event of client termination, the January 1st of every year in Florida, and every year since the PEO shall provide all employees with immediate writ- legislative reform in 2003, Florida has seen nothing but de- ten notice of termination. creases. Client Cooperation and Compliance – the CSA should have a require- Click here to continue reading… ment that the Client cooperate with the PEO in implementing and enforcing safety and risk management policies and require client’s Click here for a PDF of the new 2011 FL rates by code... compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. Records and Worksite Inspection – The CSA must provide the PEO and its workers’ compensation carrier the right to inspect the clients records and worksite © 2010 P rax iom Risk Management LLC Prax iom Risk Management is a Certified Risk Management and Safety P rofessional firm. 01/11
  • 5. PEO RISK MANAGEMENT ADVISOR With PEO Risk Management professionals averaging 20 years of experience and encompassing a broad range of industry expertise, Praxiom Risk Manage- ment is committed to providing a wide range of resources to help PEOs miti- gate risk and grow their Workers Compensation profit center. The PEO RM Advisor is a monthly e-newsletter designed to keep PEO execu- tives and Risk Management professionals informed of relevant topics in the area of PEO risk management. Sharing information and best practice through e-newsletters is one of the many ways we help support PEO organizations' risk management efforts. If you would like to contribute industry specific content or articles for publica- tion in the areas below, you may submit them to the Editor at: RiskAdvisor@praxiom-rm.com. Loss Control Claims Management Performance Metrics RM Information Systems Policy Administration Carrier Relationships Industry Certifications Up Next… We’ll continue with our performance benchmarking of professional service companies with a look into the WC results of: Engineering Firms—8711 Skilled Nursing Care Facilities—8051 © 2010 P rax iom Risk Management LLC Prax iom Risk Management is a Certified Risk Management and Safety P rofessional firm. 01/11