The document discusses the concept of jury nullification, which occurs when jurors deliberately disregard the law or refuse to apply the law based on their own sense of justice. It provides examples of jury nullification throughout history, such as during prohibition and in cases of civil rights violations. Both opponents and proponents of jury nullification are discussed. Opponents argue it undermines the rule of law and impartiality of juries, while proponents believe it can prevent unjust laws from being enforced in particular cases. The document concludes by arguing jury nullification impinges on citizens' rights more than it serves a practical purpose.
The document discusses race-based jury nullification, where jurors vote to acquit a defendant based on their race rather than the facts of the case. Both arguments for and against race-based jury nullification are presented. Examples of cases where race-based nullification may have occurred include the 1931 Scottsboro trial and the 1992 Rodney King beating trial. While race-based nullification could allow guilty offenders to go free or innocent people to be convicted based on biases, others argue it provides flexibility for community standards and has occurred historically.
This document discusses the importance of trial by jury in both the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. It provides a quote from Supreme Court Justice Byron White emphasizing that the right to a jury trial was established to protect against unfounded criminal charges and biased judges. The document then discusses jury selection (voir dire) and the role of lawyers in questioning potential jurors. It notes that in most U.S. jurisdictions, lawyers play a significant role in voir dire, but in some areas like federal courts, judges conduct most of the questioning with limited lawyer participation.
The document discusses jury nullification and whether ethnicity influences courtroom proceedings. It provides background on two issues regarding race and the criminal justice system: that minorities receive harsher sentences than whites, and dissatisfaction with public defender services and plea bargaining. The document also discusses a case where three teens were acquitted of serious charges in the beating death of a Mexican immigrant, which elicited cheers. Scholars are discussed who view ethnicity-based jury nullification as either a way to vote against injustice or as a danger to society.
This document discusses Terry v. Ohio, a landmark 1968 Supreme Court ruling that upheld the power of police to "stop and frisk" individuals. While the ruling was intended to check police discretion, the author argues it has failed to curb arbitrary searches and "frisks", especially of black men. The summary provides examples from recent news reports detailing instances where black men continue to be subjected to stops, questioning, and searches by police without reasonable suspicion. The author contends Terry's legacy has paradoxically given police powers that disproportionately impact the black community, despite being issued by the liberal Warren Court that did much to promote civil rights.
Trayvon Martin’s killing and the subsequent acquittal of his accused murderer, George Zimmerman, reopened an old wound in American society and showed how decades, perhaps even centuries old conflicts in the country have never gone away. One Twitter post immediately after the verdict urging people to ‘remember to set your clock back 50 years’ sums up the way many in the African-American community felt about the verdict. Martin, a then 16 year old African-American youth was fatally shot by a neighbourhood watchman after a fight broke out and the latter’s gun was allegedly used in self-defence.
This document summarizes a paper on the social and legal implications of felony disenfranchisement in 2016. It discusses how felony disenfranchisement laws have disproportionately impacted African Americans since the Civil Rights era. Over 6 million Americans are currently disenfranchised, including a disproportionate number of African Americans. The author argues that reforms are needed to restore voting rights upon completion of sentences to reintegrate ex-felons into their communities. However, finding a balanced solution that satisfies all parties will be challenging given the conflicting interests around state sovereignty, punishment, and civil rights.
The document discusses the concept of jury nullification, which occurs when jurors deliberately disregard the law or refuse to apply the law based on their own sense of justice. It provides examples of jury nullification throughout history, such as during prohibition and in cases of civil rights violations. Both opponents and proponents of jury nullification are discussed. Opponents argue it undermines the rule of law and impartiality of juries, while proponents believe it can prevent unjust laws from being enforced in particular cases. The document concludes by arguing jury nullification impinges on citizens' rights more than it serves a practical purpose.
The document discusses race-based jury nullification, where jurors vote to acquit a defendant based on their race rather than the facts of the case. Both arguments for and against race-based jury nullification are presented. Examples of cases where race-based nullification may have occurred include the 1931 Scottsboro trial and the 1992 Rodney King beating trial. While race-based nullification could allow guilty offenders to go free or innocent people to be convicted based on biases, others argue it provides flexibility for community standards and has occurred historically.
This document discusses the importance of trial by jury in both the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. It provides a quote from Supreme Court Justice Byron White emphasizing that the right to a jury trial was established to protect against unfounded criminal charges and biased judges. The document then discusses jury selection (voir dire) and the role of lawyers in questioning potential jurors. It notes that in most U.S. jurisdictions, lawyers play a significant role in voir dire, but in some areas like federal courts, judges conduct most of the questioning with limited lawyer participation.
The document discusses jury nullification and whether ethnicity influences courtroom proceedings. It provides background on two issues regarding race and the criminal justice system: that minorities receive harsher sentences than whites, and dissatisfaction with public defender services and plea bargaining. The document also discusses a case where three teens were acquitted of serious charges in the beating death of a Mexican immigrant, which elicited cheers. Scholars are discussed who view ethnicity-based jury nullification as either a way to vote against injustice or as a danger to society.
This document discusses Terry v. Ohio, a landmark 1968 Supreme Court ruling that upheld the power of police to "stop and frisk" individuals. While the ruling was intended to check police discretion, the author argues it has failed to curb arbitrary searches and "frisks", especially of black men. The summary provides examples from recent news reports detailing instances where black men continue to be subjected to stops, questioning, and searches by police without reasonable suspicion. The author contends Terry's legacy has paradoxically given police powers that disproportionately impact the black community, despite being issued by the liberal Warren Court that did much to promote civil rights.
Trayvon Martin’s killing and the subsequent acquittal of his accused murderer, George Zimmerman, reopened an old wound in American society and showed how decades, perhaps even centuries old conflicts in the country have never gone away. One Twitter post immediately after the verdict urging people to ‘remember to set your clock back 50 years’ sums up the way many in the African-American community felt about the verdict. Martin, a then 16 year old African-American youth was fatally shot by a neighbourhood watchman after a fight broke out and the latter’s gun was allegedly used in self-defence.
This document summarizes a paper on the social and legal implications of felony disenfranchisement in 2016. It discusses how felony disenfranchisement laws have disproportionately impacted African Americans since the Civil Rights era. Over 6 million Americans are currently disenfranchised, including a disproportionate number of African Americans. The author argues that reforms are needed to restore voting rights upon completion of sentences to reintegrate ex-felons into their communities. However, finding a balanced solution that satisfies all parties will be challenging given the conflicting interests around state sovereignty, punishment, and civil rights.
Faith and Law
As Kerala erupts in fury over the Supreme Court verdict allowing women of all ages to visit the shrine at Sabarimala, politics and religion create a dangerous flashpoint. What are the legal options?
The document discusses barriers to voting for formerly incarcerated individuals in California. It finds that over 60% of participants in community input sessions reported confusion over their voting eligibility due to criminal convictions. Their status changes as they move through the criminal justice system, and they are sometimes provided incorrect information. While California law allows voting for those on probation or after completing their sentence, many formerly incarcerated people remain unaware of their rights or believe they must take extra steps to register again. Compliance with a 2014 law requiring probation departments to post voting rights information online or in offices has been limited.
The 15th Amendment granted African Americans the right to vote after the Civil War. However, Southern states were able to circumvent this through laws like literacy tests and poll taxes, effectively denying African Americans their voting rights. As part of the Compromise of 1877 that resolved the disputed 1876 presidential election, the federal government agreed to withdraw troops from the South and allow states to determine racial issues. This led Southern states to pass more discriminatory voting laws, disenfranchising African American and other minority voters through the early 1900s.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president and vice president, and how someone can win the popular vote but lose the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to indirectly elect the president, and how someone can win the popular vote but lose the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president and vice president, and how someone can win the popular vote but lose the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president and vice president, and how someone can win the popular vote but lose the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
The document discusses the disproportionate impact of the criminal justice system on communities of color and calls for reform. Key points:
- People of color, especially Black and Hispanic men, are incarcerated at much higher rates than whites, despite similar rates of drug use and crime.
- Racial disparities exist at every level, from policing and sentencing to employment opportunities post-release.
- The growth of the for-profit prison industry creates perverse incentives to incarcerate more people, especially minorities, to guarantee profits.
- Meaningful reform is needed to dismantle systemic racism in the criminal justice system and address it as a civil rights issue. Some local initiatives show promise in reducing racial dispar
The 15th Amendment granted African Americans the right to vote but Southern states found ways to bypass this and disenfranchise black voters through measures like literacy tests, poll taxes, and grandfather clauses. A compromise in 1877 removed federal troops from the South, allowing Democratic legislatures to impose these discriminatory voting laws and unleash a reign of terror by groups like the KKK to intimidate black communities and strip African Americans of political power.
1) Missouri has debated stricter voter ID laws for over a decade, with Republicans generally pushing for them and Democrats opposing. In November, voters will decide on a ballot measure that could make Missouri's voting requirements the strictest in the nation.
2) Proponents argue stricter laws prevent voter fraud, but studies show very little evidence of voter impersonation fraud. Opponents argue they disproportionately impact minority, elderly, student, and Democratic voters.
3) A 2010 state house election was swung by two family members committing voter fraud for one candidate. However, the proposed laws may not have prevented this specific incident of fraud involving false voter registration.
This document provides a brief history and overview of capital punishment. It discusses how the death penalty has been used throughout history and how views on it have changed over time, especially in the 18th century Enlightenment. It also summarizes several important Supreme Court cases that have shaped the application of the death penalty in the US. Finally, it covers current death row practices and procedures, as well as topics like public opinion, juveniles receiving the death penalty, and executing the mentally disabled.
Chapter 10 - The American Legal System and the Courtsatrantham
This document provides an overview of the U.S. legal system and Supreme Court. It discusses how the legal system aims to provide security, predictability, and enforce societal values through substantive and procedural law. It also outlines the structure and jurisdiction of state and federal courts, as well as factors that influence Supreme Court nominations and decisions.
Discussion 3 Open33 unread replies.33 replies.Be sure to consLyndonPelletier761
Discussion 3: Open
33 unread replies.33 replies.
Be sure to consider multiple perspectives and write as clearly and concisely as possible. You must include a minimum of 300 words and cite your work. Be sure to review the discussion rubric tab under the 'Start Here' module for details on how your discussions will be graded.
Side note: I do not teach from the textbook and you are not required to read it. Consider the textbook as a reference to provide clarification on various topics. You should read the information below, it will help you complete the assignment. I can tell if you read the information because it is usually reflected in the quality of work that you submit.
“Give us the ballot, and we will no longer have to worry the federal government about our basic rights.
Give us the ballot, and we will no longer plead to the federal government for passage of an anti-lynching law; we will by the power of our vote write the law on the statute books of the South and bring an end to the dastardly acts of the hooded perpetrators of violence.
Give us the ballot, and we will transform the salient misdeeds of bloodthirsty mobs into the calculated good deeds of orderly citizens.
Give us the ballot, and we will fill our legislative halls with men of goodwill and send to the sacred halls of Congress men who will not sign a “Southern Manifesto” because of their devotion to the manifesto of justice.
Give us the ballot, and we will place judges on the benches of the South who will do justly and love mercy, and we will place at the head of the southern states governors who will, who have felt not only the tang of the human, but the glow of the Divine.
Give us the ballot, and we will quietly and nonviolently, without rancor or bitterness, implement the Supreme Court’s decision of May seventeenth, 1954.”
"Give Us the Ballot (Links to an external site.)” was delivered by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr at the Prayer Pilgrimage for Freedom on May 17, 1957, in Washington. D.C.
Introduction
We just passed the first anniversary of the January 6th insurrection, where domestic terrorists sought to overthrow the November 2020 election and decertify votes of mostly historically excluded groups (HEG’s) or those originally left out of the Constitution. Some of the insurrectionists were seen wearing anti-Semitic attire and insignia affiliated with white supremacist groups. Dr. Robert Pape from the University of Chicago analyzed the demographics of 377 alleged insurrectionists who were arrested. His report (Links to an external site.) found that those arrested came from communities with a decreased population of White people and an increase in diverse populations. Dr. Pape noted, “We’re finding evidence that the key driver is fear that rights of Hispanic people and Black people are outpacing the rights of white people.” The FBI (Links to an external site.) has issued several warnings on the increase in “domestic terrorism” and white supremacy in America ...
Faith and Law
As Kerala erupts in fury over the Supreme Court verdict allowing women of all ages to visit the shrine at Sabarimala, politics and religion create a dangerous flashpoint. What are the legal options?
The document discusses barriers to voting for formerly incarcerated individuals in California. It finds that over 60% of participants in community input sessions reported confusion over their voting eligibility due to criminal convictions. Their status changes as they move through the criminal justice system, and they are sometimes provided incorrect information. While California law allows voting for those on probation or after completing their sentence, many formerly incarcerated people remain unaware of their rights or believe they must take extra steps to register again. Compliance with a 2014 law requiring probation departments to post voting rights information online or in offices has been limited.
The 15th Amendment granted African Americans the right to vote after the Civil War. However, Southern states were able to circumvent this through laws like literacy tests and poll taxes, effectively denying African Americans their voting rights. As part of the Compromise of 1877 that resolved the disputed 1876 presidential election, the federal government agreed to withdraw troops from the South and allow states to determine racial issues. This led Southern states to pass more discriminatory voting laws, disenfranchising African American and other minority voters through the early 1900s.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president and vice president, and how someone can win the popular vote but lose the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to indirectly elect the president, and how someone can win the popular vote but lose the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president and vice president, and how someone can win the popular vote but lose the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president and vice president, and how someone can win the popular vote but lose the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. election process. It discusses how elections are administered based on the Constitution, with the President and Vice President elected every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The past four presidents are listed as George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan. Voter turnout percentages from 2000 are provided. Finally, it describes the Electoral College system where electors cast ballots to elect the president, which allows someone to lose the national popular vote but win the election.
The document discusses the disproportionate impact of the criminal justice system on communities of color and calls for reform. Key points:
- People of color, especially Black and Hispanic men, are incarcerated at much higher rates than whites, despite similar rates of drug use and crime.
- Racial disparities exist at every level, from policing and sentencing to employment opportunities post-release.
- The growth of the for-profit prison industry creates perverse incentives to incarcerate more people, especially minorities, to guarantee profits.
- Meaningful reform is needed to dismantle systemic racism in the criminal justice system and address it as a civil rights issue. Some local initiatives show promise in reducing racial dispar
The 15th Amendment granted African Americans the right to vote but Southern states found ways to bypass this and disenfranchise black voters through measures like literacy tests, poll taxes, and grandfather clauses. A compromise in 1877 removed federal troops from the South, allowing Democratic legislatures to impose these discriminatory voting laws and unleash a reign of terror by groups like the KKK to intimidate black communities and strip African Americans of political power.
1) Missouri has debated stricter voter ID laws for over a decade, with Republicans generally pushing for them and Democrats opposing. In November, voters will decide on a ballot measure that could make Missouri's voting requirements the strictest in the nation.
2) Proponents argue stricter laws prevent voter fraud, but studies show very little evidence of voter impersonation fraud. Opponents argue they disproportionately impact minority, elderly, student, and Democratic voters.
3) A 2010 state house election was swung by two family members committing voter fraud for one candidate. However, the proposed laws may not have prevented this specific incident of fraud involving false voter registration.
This document provides a brief history and overview of capital punishment. It discusses how the death penalty has been used throughout history and how views on it have changed over time, especially in the 18th century Enlightenment. It also summarizes several important Supreme Court cases that have shaped the application of the death penalty in the US. Finally, it covers current death row practices and procedures, as well as topics like public opinion, juveniles receiving the death penalty, and executing the mentally disabled.
Chapter 10 - The American Legal System and the Courtsatrantham
This document provides an overview of the U.S. legal system and Supreme Court. It discusses how the legal system aims to provide security, predictability, and enforce societal values through substantive and procedural law. It also outlines the structure and jurisdiction of state and federal courts, as well as factors that influence Supreme Court nominations and decisions.
Discussion 3 Open33 unread replies.33 replies.Be sure to consLyndonPelletier761
Discussion 3: Open
33 unread replies.33 replies.
Be sure to consider multiple perspectives and write as clearly and concisely as possible. You must include a minimum of 300 words and cite your work. Be sure to review the discussion rubric tab under the 'Start Here' module for details on how your discussions will be graded.
Side note: I do not teach from the textbook and you are not required to read it. Consider the textbook as a reference to provide clarification on various topics. You should read the information below, it will help you complete the assignment. I can tell if you read the information because it is usually reflected in the quality of work that you submit.
“Give us the ballot, and we will no longer have to worry the federal government about our basic rights.
Give us the ballot, and we will no longer plead to the federal government for passage of an anti-lynching law; we will by the power of our vote write the law on the statute books of the South and bring an end to the dastardly acts of the hooded perpetrators of violence.
Give us the ballot, and we will transform the salient misdeeds of bloodthirsty mobs into the calculated good deeds of orderly citizens.
Give us the ballot, and we will fill our legislative halls with men of goodwill and send to the sacred halls of Congress men who will not sign a “Southern Manifesto” because of their devotion to the manifesto of justice.
Give us the ballot, and we will place judges on the benches of the South who will do justly and love mercy, and we will place at the head of the southern states governors who will, who have felt not only the tang of the human, but the glow of the Divine.
Give us the ballot, and we will quietly and nonviolently, without rancor or bitterness, implement the Supreme Court’s decision of May seventeenth, 1954.”
"Give Us the Ballot (Links to an external site.)” was delivered by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr at the Prayer Pilgrimage for Freedom on May 17, 1957, in Washington. D.C.
Introduction
We just passed the first anniversary of the January 6th insurrection, where domestic terrorists sought to overthrow the November 2020 election and decertify votes of mostly historically excluded groups (HEG’s) or those originally left out of the Constitution. Some of the insurrectionists were seen wearing anti-Semitic attire and insignia affiliated with white supremacist groups. Dr. Robert Pape from the University of Chicago analyzed the demographics of 377 alleged insurrectionists who were arrested. His report (Links to an external site.) found that those arrested came from communities with a decreased population of White people and an increase in diverse populations. Dr. Pape noted, “We’re finding evidence that the key driver is fear that rights of Hispanic people and Black people are outpacing the rights of white people.” The FBI (Links to an external site.) has issued several warnings on the increase in “domestic terrorism” and white supremacy in America ...
This document is a chapter from the textbook Magruder's American Government titled "Voters and Voter Behavior". It is divided into 4 sections that discuss the history and expansion of voting rights in the United States, current voter qualifications, the impact of civil rights legislation and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and factors that influence voter behavior such as reasons for not voting, sociological influences, and psychological influences like party identification.
This document provides discussion questions and prompts for weekly online discussions in a political science course. It includes 8 topics, each with a discussion question related to readings from two textbooks - The American Democracy and Understanding the Arizona Constitution. For each discussion, students are asked to post a response by Wednesday answering the question in 6 sentences, citing 2 sources, and writing clearly. Topics address issues like federalism, the electoral college, the Bill of Rights, and democratic principles in state constitutions.
This document provides discussion questions and prompts for weekly online discussions in a political science course. It includes 8 topics, each with a discussion question related to readings from two textbooks - The American Democracy and Understanding the Arizona Constitution. For each discussion, students are asked to post a response by Wednesday answering the question in 6 sentences, citing 2 sources, and writing clearly. Topics address issues like federalism, the electoral college, the Bill of Rights, and democratic principles in state constitutions.
Civil War 2 7th Issue Infowars Magazineinfowarrior78
The document discusses preparations by authorities in the US for potential civil unrest. It notes that stirring unrest has long been a tactic used by global banking elites to loot nations and seize control of their assets. The US remains a key target for this strategy. Evidence of preparations in the US include passage of laws allowing indefinite detention of citizens, aggressive prosecution of whistleblowers, government spying on social media to monitor signs of unrest, and construction of huge spy centers to monitor communications. The trend suggests authorities are readying to exploit social unrest to further financial interests, using a tested method of destabilization.
Persuasive Essay Voting
Voting Synthesis Essay
Importance of Voting Essay
Essay On Voting Rights
Voting Rights
Voting Essay
Voting And Voting Behavior
Internet Voting Essay
Make A Change: Vote Essay
Persuasive Speech On Voting
Why Is Voting Important
Why Voting Should Be Mandatory
Voting Behavior Essay
Voting Essay
The Responsibility of Voting Essay
The Pros And Cons Of The Right To Voting
Voting Essay
Voting In Voting
Voting Synthesis Essay
The Importance of Voting
The document discusses the importance of the right to vote in a democratic society. It notes that citizens often take this right for granted or do not exercise it, despite how hard others fought to achieve it. While some parts of the world still experience violence and oppression, citizens in the U.S. have the right to vote for their representatives, which is fundamental to a democratic system. However, the system does not always fully encourage or allow citizens to vote freely. The right to vote is protected by amendments to the U.S. Constitution that prohibit denying citizens the right to vote based on race, sex, failure to pay a poll tax, and age for those over 18.
They all say that they are playing with the fire for freedom, and the right to live. That is right, it is the RIGHT to have RIGHT, and it is worth dying for to have the RIGHT. A RIGHT to speak; a right to have expressed; above all a right to select our representatives – the voting right is the right of an American Citizen that many are jealous of, at least that is what we are told. This is fundamentally critical for a civilized nation of a democratic class to have voting right. As President Abraham Lincoln best described democracy as the "government of the people, by the people, and for the people." For that government to be "by the people," however, requires that the people decide who shall be their leaders including Mayors, congressmen, senators, governors, and the president.
Similar to My Brother, Data, & the American Justice System (9)
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu BiographyVoterMood
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
Your Go-To Press Release Newswire for Maximum Visibility and Impact.pdfPressReleasePower4
This downloadable guide explains why press releases are still important for businesses today and the challenges you might face with traditional distribution methods. Learn how [Your Website Name] offers a comprehensive solution for crafting compelling press releases, targeting the right media outlets, and maximizing visibility.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxPragencyuk
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
The Biggest Threat to Western Civilization _ Andy Blumenthal _ The Blogs.pdfAndy (Avraham) Blumenthal
Article in The Times of Israel by Andy Blumenthal: China and Russia are commonly considered the biggest military threats to Western civilization, but I believe that is incorrect. The biggest strategic threat is a terrorist Jihadi Caliphate.
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
1. My Brother,
Data,
& the
American Justice System
Kendra Clarke
kendra@clarkwithane.com
most socials: itsclarkwithane
17 November 2016
Tech Innovation + Inclusion Summit:
Washington, D.C.
5. 5
“Undoubtedly, the right of suffrage is a
fundamental matter in a free and democratic
society. Especially since the right to exercise
the franchise in a free and unimpaired
manner is preservative of other basic civil
and political rights, any alleged infringement
of the right of citizens to vote must be
carefully and meticulously scrutinized…”
Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)
7. 7
Two states allow prisoners to vote,
and there are over 1.5 million men & women
in prison who cannot1
0
8. 8
13 states allow ex-felons to vote
after they’re released from prison
0
268,437
9. 9
4 states allow ex-felons to vote
after they complete parole
0
268,437
364,884
10. 10
21 states will allow ex-felons to vote
only after full sentence completion2
0
268,437
364,884
1,812,373
11. 11
6 states may allow ex-felons to vote
after sentence completion—depending on
crime type/outcome of an individual petition
0
268,437
364,884
1,812,373
726,122
12. 12
4 states will allow ex-felons to vote
only after sentence completion, years long
waiting periods, or never restore rights3
0
268,437
364,884
1,812,373
726,122
2,140,310
17. 17
MORE THAN:
Alabama Alaska Arkansas Colorado
Connecticut Delaware Hawaii Idaho Iowa
Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland
Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana
Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New
Mexico North Dakota Oklahoma Oregon
Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota
Utah Vermont West Virginia Wisconsin
Wyoming