The document criticizes Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 for making very few changes from Modern Warfare 2, only updating the maps and weapons, while keeping the same killstreak rewards system. It contrasts this with how Infinity Ward improved greatly on Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare with Modern Warfare 2 by changing things up, but then failed to make significant innovations with Modern Warfare 3. Treyarch is praised for making each of its Call of Duty games, like Black Ops 2, feel distinctly different through new settings, equipment, visuals, and story campaigns.

2. MW3 is exactly the same as MW2. Nothing
has changed. Only different maps ( bad
ones at that) and different guns. oh and
lets not forget the 5 million different
streaks you can get.
MW2
MW3

3. MW2
I’ll admit that mw2 was incredible.
You know why? Because it was so
vastly different from cod4. they
changed things up and put work into
the game so they earned respect.
MW3
Then they ruined everything
by releasing a game which
practically changed nothing
and still got the same sales
because negligent people
went ahead and bought it.
That really turned me off
Infinity Ward.

4. Treyarch on
the other
hand made
every game
vastly
different
because they
actually put
work into it.
Etc.

5. Black ops 2 is actually really good. Black ops 2 wwas
the last COD game to be released on the 2007 engine.
So I appreciate the effort Treyarch put into squeezing
every last drop of graphical enhancements out of the
engine.
-future setting
-all new equipment and arsenal
-fresh look
-very full on story campaign (flying/sky diving with
those wings on your arms was cool)

6. So if you’ve been playing MW2 and want nothing to change, then get MW3.
But if you thing you’ve played enough MW2 for now and wouldn’t mind
moving up a notch, then definitely get BO2.
But that’s for you to decide